Sculpture Trail
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Avarice and Ambition of William Benson’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
Anna Eavis, ‘The avarice and ambition of William Benson’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XII, 2002, pp. 8–37 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2002 THE AVARICE AND AMBITION OF WILLIAM BENSON ANNA EAVIS n his own lifetime William Benson’s moment of probably motivated by his desire to build a neo- Ifame came in January , as the subject of an Palladian parliament house. anonymous pamphlet: That Benson had any direct impact on the spread of neo-Palladian ideas other than his patronage of I do therefore with much contrition bewail my making Campbell through the Board of Works is, however, of contracts with deceitfulness of heart … my pride, unlikely. Howard Colvin’s comprehensive and my arrogance, my avarice and my ambition have been my downfall .. excoriating account of Benson’s surveyorship shows only too clearly that his pre-occupations were To us, however, he is also famous for building a financial and self-motivated, rather than aesthetic. precociously neo-Palladian house in , as well He did not publish on architecture, neo-Palladian or as infamous for his corrupt, incompetent and otherwise and, with the exception of Wilbury, consequently brief tenure as Surveyor-General of the appears to have left no significant buildings, either in King’s Works, which ended in his dismissal for a private or official capacity. This absence of a context deception of King and Government. Wilbury, whose for Wilbury makes the house even more startling; it elevation was claimed to be both Jonesian and appears to spring from nowhere and, as far as designed by Benson, and whose plan was based on Benson’s architectural output is concerned, to lead that of the Villa Poiana, is notable for apparently nowhere. -
R.B. Kitaj: Obsessions
PRESS RELEASE 2012 R.B. Kitaj: Obsessions The Art of Identity (21 Feb - 16 June 2013) Jewish Museum London Analyst for Our Time (23 Feb - 16 June 2013) Pallant House Gallery, Chichester, West Sussex A major retrospective exhibition of the work of R. B. R.B. Kitaj, Juan de la Cruz, 1967, Oil on canvas, Astrup Fearnley Museum of Modern Art, Oslo; If Not, Not, 1975, Oil and black chalk on canvas, Scottish Kitaj (1932-2007) - one of the most significant National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh © R.B. Kitaj Estate. painters of the post-war period – displayed concurrently in two major venues for its only UK showing. Later he enrolled at the Ruskin School of Art in Oxford, and then, in 1959, he went to the Royal College of Art in This international touring show is the first major London, where he was a contemporary of artists such as retrospective exhibition in the UK since the artist’s Patrick Caulfield and David Hockney, the latter of whom controversial Tate show in the mid-1990s and the first remained his closest painter friend throughout his life. comprehensive exhibition of the artist’s oeuvre since his death in 2007. Comprised of more than 70 works, R.B. During the 1960s Kitaj, together with his friends Francis Kitaj: Obsessions comes to the UK from the Jewish Museum Bacon, Frank Auerbach and Lucian Freud were Berlin and will be shown concurrently at Pallant House instrumental in pioneering a new, figurative art which defied Gallery, Chichester and the Jewish Museum London. the trend in abstraction and conceptualism. -
R.B. Kitaj Papers, 1950-2007 (Bulk 1965-2006)
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3q2nf0wf No online items Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Processed by Tim Holland, 2006; Norma Williamson, 2011; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj 1741 1 papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Descriptive Summary Title: R.B. Kitaj papers Date (inclusive): 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Collection number: 1741 Creator: Kitaj, R.B. Extent: 160 boxes (80 linear ft.)85 oversized boxes Abstract: R.B. Kitaj was an influential and controversial American artist who lived in London for much of his life. He is the creator of many major works including; The Ohio Gang (1964), The Autumn of Central Paris (after Walter Benjamin) 1972-3; If Not, Not (1975-76) and Cecil Court, London W.C.2. (The Refugees) (1983-4). Throughout his artistic career, Kitaj drew inspiration from history, literature and his personal life. His circle of friends included philosophers, writers, poets, filmmakers, and other artists, many of whom he painted. Kitaj also received a number of honorary doctorates and awards including the Golden Lion for Painting at the XLVI Venice Biennale (1995). He was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters (1982) and the Royal Academy of Arts (1985). -
2019/20 Exhibitions
2020/21 EXHIBITIONS (list updated on 25 February) National Gallery, London Young Bomberg and the Old Masters (until 1 March) (Free) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/young-bomberg-and-the-old-masters Nicolaes Maes: Dutch Master of the Golden Age (until 31 May) (Free) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/nicolaes-maes-dutch-master-of-the-golden-age Titian: Love, Desire, Death (16 March – 14 June) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/titian-love-desire-death Artemisia Gentileschi (4 April – 26 July) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/artemisia Sin (15 April – 5 July) (Free) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/sin Raphael (3 October – 24 January 2021) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/the-credit-suisse-exhibition-raphael Dürer’s Journeys: Travels of a Renaissance Artist (13 February 2021 – 16 May 2021) https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/durers-journeys-travels-of-a-renaissance-artist National Portrait Gallery, London (will be closed from June 2020 for three years for revamp!) Cecil Beaton’s Bright Young Things (12 March – 7 June) https://www.npg.org.uk/whatson/exhibitions/2019/cecil-beatons-bright-young-things/ David Hockney: Drawing from Life (27 February – 28 June) https://www.npg.org.uk/whatson/exhibitions/2019/david-hockney-drawing-from-life/ BP Portrait Award (21 May – 28 June) https://www.npg.org.uk/whatson/bp-portrait-award-2020/exhibition/ Royal Academy Picasso and Paper (until 13 April) https://www.royalacademy.org.uk/exhibition/picasso-and-paper Léon -
Keyser, Thomas De Dutch, 1596 - 1667
National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Keyser, Thomas de Dutch, 1596 - 1667 BIOGRAPHY Thomas de Keyser was the second son of Hendrick de Keyser (1565–1621), the famed Dutch architect, sculptor, and municipal stonemason of the city of Amsterdam, and his wife Beyken (Barbara) van Wildere, who hailed from Antwerp.[1] The family lived in a house that was part of the municipal stone yard along the Amstel River, between the Kloveniersburgwal and the Groenburgwal.[2] Thomas and his brothers Pieter and Willem were trained by their father in architecture, and each also became a highly regarded master stonemason and stone merchant in his own right. On January 10, 1616, the approximately 19-year-old Thomas became one of his father’s apprentices. As he must already have become proficient at the trade while growing up at the Amsterdam stone yard, the formal two-year apprenticeship that followed would have fulfilled the stonemasons’ guild requirements.[3] Thomas, however, achieved his greatest prominence as a painter and became the preeminent portraitist of Amsterdam’s burgeoning merchant class, at least until the arrival of Rembrandt van Rijn (Dutch, 1606 - 1669) in 1632. Nothing is known about his artistic training as a painter, which likely occurred in his younger years. Four Amsterdam portraitists have been considered his possible teacher. Ann Jensen Adams, in her catalogue raisonné of Thomas de Keyser, posits (based on circumstantial evidence) that Cornelis van der Voort (c. 1576–1624) -
UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Surrealism: a Marxist Enterprise in 1930s London Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vk769zn Author Obarski, Susan King Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Surrealism: a Marxist Enterprise in 1930s LonDon DISSERTATION submitteD in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Visual Studies by Susan King Obarski Dissertation Committee: Professor James D. Herbert, Chair Professor Cécile Whiting Associate Professor Catherine L. Benamou 2014 © 2014 Susan King Obarski DEDICATION To my parents Joan anD Jim King, and my Daughter Katie Obarski, for their love and unconditional support. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi CURRICULUM VITAE xii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xiv INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Establishing the Revolutionary Aims of British Surrealism 11 Extending Unit One 15 Aligning with Breton and Local British Traditions 18 Part of a Growing British Left 21 The International Surrealist Exhibition 31 Postmortem anD Response to the Press 46 Standing with anD Against English Culture 48 Conclusions 56 CHAPTER 2: Eileen Agar anD the Compromises of Pursuing A Free Revolutionary Art 65 Surrealism ConceiveD Upmarket 72 Autobiography of an Embryo 76 Angel of Anarchy 93 Agar as ProDucer 97 Cultural Production as a Political Cause 106 Conclusions 113 CHAPTER 3: Speaking to the Masses with Surrealist Film 125 Contributions to the British Surrealist Group 136 Presenting the Social by Experimental Means 144 Evolving Labor and Technology in The Birth of the Robot 154 MoDern Workers in Spare Time 161 Conclusions 174 CHAPTER 4: Exhibiting Picasso’s Guernica: Melding Marxist ideology and Capitalist Enterprise to Oppose Fascism 185 Spain as a Defining Surrealist Issue 189 Unity and Conflict in the A.I.A. -
Andor Gomme, 'Chevening: the Big Issues', the Georgian Group Journal, Vol. Xiv, 2004, Pp. 167–186
Andor Gomme, ‘Chevening: the big issues’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XIV, 2004, pp. 167–186 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2004 CHEVENING: THE BIG ISSUES ANDOR GOMME hevening House, Kent, is one of the most are Campbell’s engraving in volume II of Vitruvius C remarkable and important buildings in the Britannicus , published in (Fig. ), and an estate history of English domestic architecture. At one go it map of which includes a perspective and established an entirely new, classically balanced basement and ground-floor plans of the house formula for elevational design which, initially slow to (Fig. ). There are significant differences of detail catch on, came to define the pattern of house-building between these two, which are best revealed by for years from the mid-seventeenth century, superimposing information from the estate map on across an exceptional range of social position and to Campbell’s elevation (Fig. ), though with one corresponding scale of needs or desires. Perhaps important caution: close examination of the even more important, but intimately bound up with perspective shows, rather surprisingly, that it must be the façade design, is its plan – radically new to from the south-east and therefore shows not the England, but structurally as well as socially rational entrance but the garden front of the house. This is in that the transverse load-bearing walls, which proved by the differing shapes of the perrons on the economically house all the stacks, contain and define two fronts (as shown in plan) and by the presence in a state centre: a box of all the principal entertainment the perspective of a mysterious, and unexplained, rooms which leaves the side ranges free for variable cuboid of brickwork standing against the side of the layouts of family and subsidiary apartments. -
Pallant House Gallery
__ The Economic Contribution of Pallant House Gallery 16 June 2016 Contents 5. Economic Model ............................................................................... 20 5.1 Additionality Analysis .......................................................................... 21 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................... 3 5.2 Economic Multipliers ........................................................................... 23 1.1 Growing Organisation ........................................................................... 3 5.3 GVA and FTE Conversion .................................................................. 23 1.2 Dedicated Audience ............................................................................. 3 5.4 Economic Modelling Results ............................................................... 24 1.3 Overall Economic Impact ..................................................................... 3 5.4.1 Audience Analysis ............................................................................... 24 1.4 Expansion since 2008 .......................................................................... 4 5.4.2 Organisation Analysis ......................................................................... 25 2. Introduction ........................................................................................ 5 5.4.3 Overall Assessment ............................................................................ 25 2.1 Methodological Overview .................................................................... -
Anecdotes of Painting in England : with Some Account of the Principal
C ' 1 2. J? Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/paintingineng02walp ^-©HINTESS <0>F AEHJKTID 'oat/ /y ' L o :j : ANECDOTES OF PAINTING IN ENGLAND; WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF THE PRINCIPAL ARTISTS; AND INCIDENTAL NOTES ON OTHER ARTS; COLLECTED BY THE LATE MR. GEORGE VERTUE; DIGESTED AND PUBLISHED FROM HIS ORIGINAL MSS. BY THE HONOURABLE HORACE WALPOLE; WITH CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONS BY THE REV. JAMES DALLAWAY. LONDON PRINTED AT THE SHAKSPEARE PRESS, BY W. NICOL, FOR JOHN MAJOR, FLEET-STREET. MDCCCXXVI. LIST OF PLATES TO VOL. II. The Countess of Arundel, from the Original Painting at Worksop Manor, facing the title page. Paul Vansomer, . to face page 5 Cornelius Jansen, . .9 Daniel Mytens, . .15 Peter Oliver, . 25 The Earl of Arundel, . .144 Sir Peter Paul Rubens, . 161 Abraham Diepenbeck, . 1S7 Sir Anthony Vandyck, . 188 Cornelius Polenburg, . 238 John Torrentius, . .241 George Jameson, his Wife and Son, . 243 William Dobson, . 251 Gerard Honthorst, . 258 Nicholas Laniere, . 270 John Petitot, . 301 Inigo Jones, .... 330 ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD. Arms of Rubens, Vandyck & Jones to follow the title. Henry Gyles and John Rowell, . 39 Nicholas Stone, Senior and Junior, . 55 Henry Stone, .... 65 View of Wollaton, Nottinghamshire, . 91 Abraham Vanderdort, . 101 Sir B. Gerbier, . .114 George Geldorp, . 233 Henry Steenwyck, . 240 John Van Belcamp, . 265 Horatio Gentileschi, . 267 Francis Wouters, . 273 ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD continued. Adrian Hanneman, . 279 Sir Toby Matthews, . , .286 Francis Cleyn, . 291 Edward Pierce, Father and Son, . 314 Hubert Le Soeur, . 316 View of Whitehall, . .361 General Lambert, R. Walker and E. Mascall, 368 CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME. -
Eighteenth-Century Sculpture and Its Interpretation
Eighteenth-century Sculpture and its Interpretation Malcolm Baker University of Edinburgh PhD (by Research Publications) 2003 Eighteenth-century sculpture and its interpretation Publications by Malcolm Baker submitted for Degree of Ph.D by Research Publications The following publications are submitted for the above degree: 1. Figured in Marble. The Making and Viewing of Eighteenth-century Sculpture, London and Los Angeles, 2000. (65,431 words) 2. Roubiliac and The Eighteenth-century Monument. Sculpture as Theatre, New Haven and London, 1995, 207-273, 382-387. (23,337 words) (The text submitted by the candidate forms part of a collaborative work by David Bindman and Malcolm Baker; the volume is made up of several distinct authorial contributions and the responsibility of each author for different parts is clearly stated in the publication.) 3. They are accompanied by a Critical Review (10, 956 words) (Total word length: 99, 724 words.) Appendix I: Catalogue of Roubiliac's Funerary Monuments, forming Part III of Roubiliac and the Eighteenth-century Monument, 275-359 Appendix II: A list of ten related articles. 1 and 2, along with the Critical Review, were written solely by me. The text included under Appendix I was written almost entirely by me but incorporates some material provided by David Bindman and Tessa Murdoch. The articles listed in Appendix II were written solely by me, except for one article of which I was the principal author, the co-authors being Alastair Laing and Colin Harrison. I also declare that none of the above mentioned writings have been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. -
Dean's Welcome
Dean’s Welcome Dear Supporters and Friends of St Paul’s, Again, we have experienced an action- packed year so far. This is a fine testament both to the many clergy, staff and volunteers who organise services and events, but also to the active visitors and supporters whose enthusiasm for St Paul’s quite clearly knows no bounds. For all this, we are extremely grateful. As we begin the run up to Christmas, and then beyond into 2012 with HM The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee and the London Olympics, we can look back on many 2011 highlights described or shown in this “Dome” – the memorable 300th anniversary service in June for a capacity congregation of the current staff and supporters of the cathedral, the Royal Gala Concert in March which raised £150,000 for the cathedral, and much, much more. Over and above these, the constant flow of visitors, the regular cycle of services, the opportunities to engage The Right Reverend Graeme Knowles Dean, St Paul’s Cathedral with schoolchildren perhaps visiting for their very first time, or with our corporate neighbours holding a dinner in the Crypt: all these show how vibrant and relevant the cathedral continues to be to the City, the national and the international communities. Cover Photo by Michael Murphy As I approach my fifth year in the Michael Murphy from London has Deanery, on behalf of the whole Chapter, been announced as the winner of the I give thanks for the place St Paul’s holds St Paul’s Cathedral 300th Anniversary in the hearts of so many, coupled with Photo Competition. -
Heritage Days Recycling of Styles 17 & 18 Sept
HERITAGE DAYS RECYCLING OF STYLES 17 & 18 SEPT. 2016 Info Featured pictograms Organisation of Heritage Days in Brussels-Capital Region: Regional Public Service of Brussels/Brussels Urban Development Opening hours and dates Department of Monuments and Sites a CCN – Rue du Progrès/Vooruitgangsstraat 80 – 1035 Brussels M Metro lines and stops Telephone helpline open on 17 and 18 September from 10h00 to 17h00: 02/204.17.69 – Fax: 02/204.15.22 – www.heritagedaysbrussels.be T Trams [email protected] – #jdpomd – Bruxelles Patrimoines – Erfgoed Brussel The times given for buildings are opening and closing times. The organisers B Bus reserve the right to close doors earlier in case of large crowds in order to finish at the planned time. Specific measures may be taken by those in charge of the sites. g Walking Tour/Activity Smoking is prohibited during tours and the managers of certain sites may also prohibit the taking of photographs. To facilitate entry, you are asked to not Exhibition/Conference bring rucksacks or large bags. h “Listed” at the end of notices indicates the date on which the property described Bicycle Tour was listed or registered on the list of protected buildings. b The coordinates indicated in bold beside addresses refer to a map of the Region. Bus Tour A free copy of this map can be requested by writing to the Department of f Monuments and Sites. Guided tour only or Please note that advance bookings are essential for certain tours (reservation i bookings are essential number indicated below the notice). This measure has been implemented for the sole purpose of accommodating the public under the best possible conditions and ensuring that there are sufficient guides available.