Notes on the Dicnemonaceae (Musci): 11. the Status of Dicnemon Rugosum and Werneriobryum Geluense

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes on the Dicnemonaceae (Musci): 11. the Status of Dicnemon Rugosum and Werneriobryum Geluense Journ. Hallori BOI. Lab. No. 61. 273- 280 (1986) NOTES ON THE DICNEMONACEAE (MUSCI): 11. THE STATUS OF DICNEMON RUGOSUM AND WERNERIOBRYUM GELUENSE BRUCE H. ALLEN ABSTRACT. The dicranaceous pcristomes. unicellular spores, and lack of both leaf nematogens and leaf rhizoids in Dicnemon rugosum and Werneriobryurn geluense make the placement of these species in the Dicnemonaceae untenable. Conversely, the presence of leaves with a hyaline border, well differentiated alar cells, smooth, elongated and porose leaf cells, dense tomentum, and polyseteous condition all indicate that these species are properly placed in the genus Dicranoloma. D. rugosum and D. gelURnse belong to an atypical element of Dicranoloma. Species belonging to this element are also present in New Zealand, Australia, and ew Guinea. Erroneously attributed to Australia, Dicranoloma rugosum is endemic to Tahiti; D. geluense is endemic to the high mountains of eastern New Guinea. A Systematic Account of Dicranoloma rugosum Dicranoloma rugosum was originally described by Hooker (1818) as a species of Leucodon . At the time Leucodon represented a group of mosses ..... having the peristome of a Trichostomum or Didymodon (i.e. single), and lateral fruit (i .e. pleurocarpous) .. ,. (Hooker 1818). Hooker considered the species closely allied to Leucodon calycinus (=Dicnemon calycinum) and due to the mitriform calyptra of L. calycinus provisionally established the genus Lyellia for the two species. It was not until 1824, however, that Schwaegrichen transferred the two species from Leucodon. By then the name Lye/fia had been validly published by Brown (1819) for another genus of mosses and Schwaegrichen placed both species into the genus Dicnemon. Most subsequent authors have maintained this species in Dicnemon (Muller 1849; Jaeger, 1872; Paris 1896, 1904; Brotherus 1901 , 1924; Whittier 1976; Miller, Whittier& Whittier 1978). Muller (190 I), after examining the type of Eucamplodon, transferred a Tahitian species he earlier had described as Dicnemon banksii into Eucamptodon. M uller gave no other reason for his transfer, and shortly thereafter Salmon (1902) placed Dicnemon banksii into the synonomy of D. rugosum. Alien (1985) in a revision of the Dicnemonaceae considered the family highly derived and characterized by (among other features) the presence of a complex and strongly modified peristome; massive, endosporically germinating protonemata (so­ called " multicellular spores"); and numerous leaf nematogens from which leaf rhizoids arise. Hooker's L. rugosum, however, has a typical dicranaceous peristome, unicellular, exosporically germinated spores, and lacks both leaf nematogens and leaf rhizoids. These features make the placement of L. rugosum in the Dicnemonaceae untenable. 1 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166. 274 Journ. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 61 1 9 8 6 As indicated by its dicranaceous peristome, erect habit, well difTerentiated, inflated alar cells, and smooth, elongated and porose leaf cells this species belongs in the Dicranaceae. Within the Dicranaceae, its strongly sheathing perichaetial leaves are reminescent of Holomitrium. However, the presence of leaves with a hyaline border of elongated cells, its robust size, dense tomentum, smooth elongate, porose leaf cells, polyseteous condition and the lack of strongly sheathing vegetative leaf bases all indicate the genus Dicranoloma. Furthermore, while many species of Dicranoloma lack sheathing perichaetialleaves, some species of the genus in New Zealand have more or less sheathing perichaetial leaves (D. plurisetum, D. robustum, and D. menziesii). Within Dicranoloma, D. rugosum belongs to an atypical element that macroscopi­ cally is very similar to the Hawaiian Dicranum speirophyllum . This element of Dicranoloma is also present in New Zealand (D. obesifolium), Australia (D. eucamplo­ dontoides), and New guinea (D . undulatifolium and D. geluense). There is some controversy surrounding the type locality of Dicranoloma rugosum . The species was originally described by Hooker from a "New Holland" (i.e. Australia) collection sent to Turner by Dickson. Mitten (1875), however, questioned the correctness of Dickson's reported localities in general: "Dickson obtained specimens of mosses from the voyages of trading vessels, and localities were then not so precisely mentioned, so that any gathered during the voyage were liable to be reported as if gathered in the country the vessel had returned from; and there are some of the species which Dickson in this manner procured, of which the native country has yet to be discovered." Salmon (1902) noting that this "conspicuous" moss had never been recollected in Australia and citing Mitten's comments regarded Dickson's New Holland locality for this species with suspicion. Finally, on a note accompanying an isotype of Dicranoloma rugosum in BM there is a discussion of Dickson 's localities that ends: "J . D . got the specimen from an East India man, & did not know she (sic) had called at Madeira. Nor did he know that the Leucodon rugosus specimen came from Tahiti or Fiji & not from New Holland." Aside from the type collection, this species is still known only from Tahiti. Despite its restricted distribution, Dicranoloma rugosum is far from a stenotypic species. Collections are extremely variable in plant size, leaf length, the degree in which the leaves are rugose, the strength of the hyaline border and leaf serrations, capsule shape and length, and the number of setae per perichaetium. Plants that are extremely robust, have long narrow rugose leaves that are distinctly denticulate have been called Dicnemon giganteum. M tiller (1858) described Dicnemon banksii for a Tahitian moss that differed from D. rugosum in a number of vegetative characters, most prominent of which were its denticulate leaf and non-rugose leaves. Bescherelle (1895) was thefirst to question the distinctness of these two mosses, noting that in all Tahitian collections he had examined the leaves were more or less rugose (as in D. rugosum) and had denticulate margins (as in D. banksii). Salmon (1902) examined the types of both species, and found them to be identical. More specifically, Salmon noted that the type of Dicnemon banksii was" . decidedly rugose (if first moistened and then allowed to dry naturally B. H. ALLEN: Notes on the Dicnemonaceae (Musci): Il 275 without being subjected to pressure) .. " and that the leaf margin of D. rugosum was, contrary to Hooker and Schwaegrichen's description, not entire but rather, H ••• ir­ regularly denticulate, in exactly the same manner as in M liller's D. banksii." All au­ thors since Salmon have placed Dicnemon banksii under the synonymy of Dicnemon rugosum. Unfortunately, the type of Dicnemon banksii, which was deposited at B, appears to have been destroyed. Taxonomic Treatment Dicranoloma rugosum (Hook.) Alien, comb. novo Leucodon rugosum Hook., Musei Exotici 1, t. 20. 18 18 . (basionym). Dicnemon rugosum (Hook.) Schwaegr., Spec. Muse. Suppl. 2(1): 127. 1824. Eucnemis rugosa(Hook.) Brid., Bryol. Univ. 2: 217. 1827. comb. inval. Type. Australia (sic). In Nova Hollandia. Turn. Herb. a Dicksonia missus (holotype, BM; isotypes, 'BM, G, MANCH, NY). Dicranum densifolium Mohr, Ann. Bot. 2: 246. 1806. nom. nudo (vide e. Muller 1858). Dicnemon banksii e. Mull., Bot. Zeit. 16: 16 1. 1858. Dicnemos banksii e. Mull ex Beseh., Ann. Sci. at. Bot. ser. 7, 20: 18. 1894. or/hogr. var. Eucamptodon banksii (e. Mull.) e. Mull., Gen Muse. Fr.: 248 . 1901. Type. Tahiti. Ex insula Tahiti retulit Banks (type, B; apparently destroyed). Dicnemon giganteum Schimp. in Salm., J. Bot. 40: 7. 1902. nom. inval. in synom . Dicnemon procerrimum Schimp. in Salm., J. Bot. 40: 7. 1902. nom. inval. in synom. Plants medium to large, 4 - 9cm high, more or less shiny, yellow-brown to yellow-green, caespitose. Stems red, densely tomentose; in cross-section 2 - 3 rows of small, thick-walled, red­ brown epidermal cells, a cortex of larger, thinner-walled, reddish-yellow cells and a central strand of small thin-walled hyaline cells. Branches infrequent, identical to stems. Leaves 4 - 6 mm x 1.5 mm, very dense, rigid, imbricate-appressed to erect-spreading, more or less transversely rugose, ovate-lanceolate to lanceolate, concave or plane; margins entire and plane below, more or less denticulate and incurved above, variably bordered by 2 - 7 rows of long, narrow, hyaline cells; apex acute or shortly acuminate; costa single, E-type (see Kawai 1968), percurrent, strong throughout (80 - 100 J.lm wide at base). Cells narrowly elongate, longer and narrower toward the margins, shorter and wider toward the costa; upper cells long-rhomboidal to rhomic, distinctly porose; alar cells orange-yellow to yellow-brown, conspicuously enlarged. Dioicous. Male plants dwarfed on female plants. Sexually mature males 1.0 - 1.3 mm long; leaves lanceolate, ecostate, 0.4 - 1.0 mm long, cells elongate-rhomboidal, more or less thick-walled, not porose, alar cells weakly differentiated. Perichaetia terminal, becoming laterally displaced; outer leaves 3 - 4 mm long, sheathing, abruptly long setaceous-acuminate, costa present; inner leaves 1 PLATE I. Distribution of Dicranoloma rugosum in Tahiti. 276 Journ. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 61 1 9 8 6 8 - 12 mm long, closely sheathing the seta, long setaceous above. Archegonia numerous, 120 mm long, paraphyses absent. Capsules exserted or shortly emergent. Setae 8 - 15 mm long, red or yellow, I - 3 per perichaetium; in cross-section 3 - 4 layers of small, thick-walled
Recommended publications
  • An Annotated Checklist of Tasmanian Mosses
    15 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF TASMANIAN MOSSES by P.I Dalton, R.D. Seppelt and A.M. Buchanan An annotated checklist of the Tasmanian mosses is presented to clarify the occurrence of taxa within the state. Some recently collected species, for which there are no published records, have been included. Doubtful records and excluded speciei. are listed separately. The Tasmanian moss flora as recognised here includes 361 species. Key Words: mosses, Tasmania. In BANKS, M.R. et al. (Eds), 1991 (3l:iii): ASPECTS OF TASMANIAN BOTANY -- A TR1BUn TO WINIFRED CURTIS. Roy. Soc. Tasm. Hobart: 15-32. INTRODUCTION in recent years previously unrecorded species have been found as well as several new taxa described. Tasmanian mosses received considerable attention We have assigned genera to families followi ng Crosby during the early botanical exploration of the antipodes. & Magill (1981 ), except where otherwise indicated in One of the earliest accounts was given by Wilson (1859), the case of more recent publications. The arrangement who provided a series of descriptions of the then-known of families, genera and species is in alphabetic order for species, accompanied by coloured illustrations, as ease of access. Taxa known to occur in Taslnania ami Part III of J.D. Hooker's Botany of the Antarctic its neighbouring islands only are listed; those for Voyage. Although there have been a number of papers subantarctic Macquarie Island (politically part of since that time, two significant compilations were Tasmania) are not treated and have been presented published about the tum of the century. The first was by elsewhere (Seppelt 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Vale of Belvoir Reserve Supplement Contents Key
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PrOGRAM Vale of Belvoir Reserve Supplement Contents Key Appendix A: Species Lists 3 ¤ = Previously recorded on the reserve and Fauna 4 found on this survey Vertebrates 4 * = New record for this reserve Birds 4 ^ = Exotic/Pest Fishes 5 # = EPBC listed Frogs 5 ~ = TSP listed Putative new species Mammals 6 Previously recorded on the reserve but not found on Reptiles 6 this survey Invertebrates 7 Bees 7 EPBC = Environment Protection and Biodiversity Butterflies and Moths 7 Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) Flies 7 TSP = Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Beetles 7 (Tasmania) True Bugs 8 Grasshoppers 8 Dragonflies 8 Caddisflies 9 Millipedes 9 Spiders 10 Crustaceans 10 Snails and Slugs 11 Flora 12 Flowering Plants 12 Gymnosperms 13 Ferns and Fern Allies 13 Liverworts 14 Mosses 14 Fungi 15 Appendix B: Rare and Threatened Species 17 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 19 2 Bush Blitz survey report — Tasmania 2010 Appendix A: Species Lists Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this appendix are consistent with that from the Australian Faunal Directory (AFD), the Australian Plant Name Index (APNI) and the Australian Plant Census (APC). Current at April 2012 Vale of Belvoir Reserve Supplement 3 Fauna Vertebrates Birds Family Species Common name Acanthizidae Acanthiza ewingii Tasmanian Thornbill Acanthiza pusilla * Brown Thornbill Acanthornis magna Scrubtit Calamanthus fuliginosus * Striated Fieldwren Sericornis frontalis * White-browed Scrubwren Sericornis humilis * Tasmanian Scrubwren Accipitridae Aquila audax *
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES SEMATOPHYLLACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 28 JUNE 2016 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2016. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: “Source: Landcare Research” Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: “Sourced from Landcare Research” See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand [electronic resource] : mosses. Fascicle 28, Sematophyllaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2016. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-478-34798-2 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1.Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.345.183(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/B12011 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2016: Sematophyllaceae. In: Heenan, P.B.; Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand - Mosses. Fascicle 28. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/B12011 Cover image: Wijkia extenuata var. extenuata, habit with capsules. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from B.H. Macmillan 95/42, CHR 506658, and D. Glenny s.n., 25 Nov. 1985, CHR 438413. Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1 Typification..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Dicranum (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta) with Fragile Leaves in Russia Виды Рода Dicranum (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta) С Ломкими Листьями В России Elena A
    Arctoa (2008) 17: 63-83 SPECIES OF DICRANUM (DICRANACEAE, BRYOPHYTA) WITH FRAGILE LEAVES IN RUSSIA ВИДЫ РОДА DICRANUM (DICRANACEAE, BRYOPHYTA) С ЛОМКИМИ ЛИСТЬЯМИ В РОССИИ ELENA A. IGNATOVA1 & VLADIMIR E. FEDOSOV1 Е. А. ИГНАТОВА1, В. Э. ФЕДОСОВ1 Abstract Three species of Dicranum with fragile leaves were usually recognized in Rus- sia: D. fragilifolium, D. tauricum and D. viride. However, our revision based on morphology and nrITS sequences reveals that two more species were overlooked. Collections from the Russian Far East, including both mainland and the Kuril Is- lands, usually treated as D. viride were found to be different from the european D. viride, thus supporting the resurrection of D. hakkodense Cardot that was synonymised with D. viride and not accepted for a long time as a distinct species. In addition to the resurrection of D. hakkodense, its distributional range is much expanded. One more species, Dicranum pacificum sp. nov. was revealed among the collections from Kam- chatka, Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. It is clearly separated from the superficially similar D. fragilifolium, although probably not closely related to it. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that the group of Dicranum with fragile leaves is not monophyletic. Резюме В большинстве работ по флоре мхов России для территории страны признавали 3 вида Dicranum с ломкими листьями: D. fragilifolium, D. tauricum и D. viride. Однако в результате ревизии группы по морфологическим и молекулярно-генетическим данным с использованием ITS выявлено еще два вида. ‘Дальневосточный D. viride’, как выяснилось, является самостоятельным видом; ранее он был описан как D. hakkodense Cardot из Японии, но потом был синонимизирован с D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bryological Times M ARCH 2013
    ROANOKE COLLEGE V OLUME 137 The Bryological Times M ARCH 2013 Table of Contents From Your Treasurer p. 2 IAB in London in 2013 p. 2 Alpine Snowbed Studies and Rare Liverworts and Mosses… p. 3—4 Bryological News from Spain p. 4 — 5, 14, 19 Recent Bryological Activities in Korea p. 6—7 Loss of Bryologist A. J. E. Smith p. 7 Return to the Roots. A Gedenkschrift dedicated to the memory of Marian Kuc p. 8 Retirement of a Mexican Bryologist p. 9 Flora of North America north of Mexico, Vol. 28 needs YOU p. 9 The First National workshop of the Sri Lankan Bryophyte Diversity p. 10—12,17 Bryological Theses 29 p. 13—14 Bryology in Brazil! p. 15 Synthesys p. 18 Sphagnum in Estonia p. 19 Obituary: Jeanne Florschutz-deWaard p. 20—21 Tools, Tips, & Techniques: imaging p. 22 British Bryological Society 2013 Events p. 23 Stanley Greene Award; YOUTUBE Bogmosses lecture p. 23 Cape Horn, Bryological Paradise p. 24—27 IAB Eagle Hill Seminars p. 28 Bogmoss in the Iceman’s Stomach p. 28—29 Establishment of the Bryological Group of Thailand p. 30 Bryology in China p. 31 Subscribing to Bryonet-l p. 32 Country Contacts p. 33 ROANOKE COLLEGE V OLUME 137 The Bryological Times M ARCH 2013 From your Treasurer by Matt VonKonrat By now, all members should have such as The Bryological Times. For medium to long-term objective as an been contacted in regards to current those of you who believe you are association. For those who are unable membership status through the new members and have NOT received any to access the online database, or who system at MemberManager.net/iab.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1, Chapter 4-2: Adaptive Strategies: Phenology, It's All in the Timing
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Adaptive Strategies: Phenology, It's All in the Timing. Chapt. 4-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 4-2-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 3 June 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 4-2 ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES: PHENOLOGY, IT'S ALL IN THE TIMING TABLE OF CONTENTS Timing the Stages – Environmental Cues ...................................................................................................... 4-2-2 Patterns ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-2-2 Growth ......................................................................................................................................................... 4-2-3 Asexual Reproduction .................................................................................................................................. 4-2-7 Gametangia .................................................................................................................................................. 4-2-8 Protandry and Protogyny...................................................................................................................... 4-2-10 Sporophyte Maturation ............................................................................................................................... 4-2-11 Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry of Bryophytes Ge Xiaowei
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS CHEMISTRY OF BRYOPHYTES GE XIAOWEI (M.Sc., CHINESE ACADEMY OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE) A THESIS SUBMITED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to gratefully acknowledge the enthusiastic supervision of Professor Leslie J. Harrison throughout the duration of this project. Without his encouragement and patience, nothing would be possible. Also thanks to Professor Benito C. Tan for identification of the plant materials and many instructions during my research. Several people have been instrumental in allowing this project to be completed. I would like to thank especially Madam Han Yan Hui and Miss Ler Peggy from NMR laboratory, Madam Wong Lai Kwai and Madam Lai Hui Ngee from mass spectrometer laboratory, and Ms Tan Geok Kheng from X-Ray laboratory. Thanks them for their assistance with all types of technical problems at all time. I am also grateful to my friends Dr. Wang Yan Mei, Ms Teo Ee Ling, Zhang Guo Dong, Li Wei, and Huang Ming Xing for their discussions, suggestions and happy hours with them. Thanks to National University of Singapore to award me the research scholarship. Finally, I am forever indebted to my families, my wife, my son, and my parents for their endless understanding, patience, support and love. ii Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Natural products in drug discovery 2 1.2 Natural products in chemical ecology 3 1.3 New technologies and strategies in natural product studies 4 1.3.1 New technologies in natural product chemistry 7 1.3.2 Sources of novel natural products 8 1.3.3 Biotechnologies in natural product chemistry 11 1.4 Natural products from bryophytes 13 1.4.1 Natural products from Mosses 14 1.4.2 Natural products from liverworts 21 Chapter 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated List of Mosses of Korea
    Journal of Species Research 9(4):377-412, 2020 An updated list of mosses of Korea Wonhee Kim1,*, Masanobu Higuchi2 and Tomio Yamaguchi3 1National Institute of Biological Resources, 42 Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Incheon 22689 Republic of Korea 2Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba 305-0005 Japan 3Program of Basci Biology, Graduate School of Integrated Science for Life, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-hiroshima-shi 739-8526 Japan *Correspondent: [email protected] Cardot (1904) first reported 98 Korean mosses, which were collected from Busan, Gangwon Province, Mokpo, Seoul, Wonsan and Pyongyang by Father Faurie in 1901. Thirty-four of these species were new species to the world. However, eight of these species have been not listed to the moss checklist of Korea before this study. Thus, this study complies the literature including Korean mosses, and lists all the species there. As the result, the moss list of Korea is updated as including 775 taxa (728 species, 7 subspecies, 38 varieties, 2 forma) arranged into 56 families and 250 genera. This list include species that have been newly recorded since 1980. Brachythecium is the largest genus in Korea, and Fissidens, Sphagnum, Dicranum and Entodon are relatively large. Additionally, this study cites specimens collected from Jeju Island, Samcheok, Gangwon Province, and Socheong Island, and it is possible to confirm the distribution of 338 species in Korea. Keywords: bryophytes, checklist, Korea, mosses, updated‌ Ⓒ 2020 National Institute of Biological Resources DOI:10.12651/JSR.2020.9.4.377 INTRODUCTION Choi (1980), Park and Choi (2007) reported a “New List of Bryophytes in Korea” by presenting an overview of The first study on Korean bryophytes was published by bryophytes surveyed in Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Subalpine Mire Complex 67
    DOBSON: VEGETATION OF A CANTERBURY SUBALPINE MIRE COMPLEX 67 V E GET A T ION OF A CAN T E R BUR Y SUBALPINE MIRE COMPLEX Department of Botany, University of Canterbury, Christchurch. New Zealand SUMMARY: The vegetation of a subalpine mire complex and the inter.relationships of the plant species in it are described. Particular emphasjs is placed on the relationship of cuslllon plant vegetation to other types. Hypotheses are advanced to account for the differing vegeta. tion patterns and evidence based on variations jn micro-habitats is produced to support these. INTRODUCTION Cushion mire vegetation is peculiar to the cooler parts of the Southern Hemisphere and in New Zea- land characteristically occurs in the upper montane and subalpine zones, descending to lower altitudes in Stewart Island and in the subantarctic region. There is no precise altitudinal limit for the occur~ rence of mires containing cushion vegetation but rather gradual transition into the Sphagnum- dominated mires of lower altitudes. On anyone mire, however, it is unusual to find intermediate vegetation types; cushion vegetation being either completely dominant or very subordinate. This account describes an investigation into the different mire types occurring on one site in the Canterbury Alps although reference is made to other sites in the vicinity. The main advantage of the study area was that it contained a complex mosaic of all the main subalpine mire types of that region. markedly different vegetation types often occurring directly adjacent to each other. A brief description and photographs of the mire types of Canterbury have been provided by Burrows (1969) who included the site of this study in his survey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Checklist of Hawaiian Mosses
    Tropical Bryology 25: 35-69, 2004 A revised checklist of Hawaiian mosses G. W. Staples, C. T. Imada, W. J. Hoe, and C. W. Smith Correction for Page 38: Hawaiian Moss Flora in Summary Endemic Indigenous Alien Total Families 0 41 1 42 Genera 2 126 7 135 Species 75 166 14 255 Total named taxa 90 169 14 273 Correction for Page 39: Frahm et al. 2000, cited under Amphidium tortuosum, should correctly refer to the following: Frahm, J.-P., T. Klöcker, R. Schmidt, and C. Schöter. 2000. Revision der Gattung Amphidium (Musci, Dicranaceae). Tropical Bryology 18: 173-184. Revised checklist of Hawaiian mosses 35 Tropical Bryology 25: 35-69, 2004 A revised checklist of Hawaiian mosses1 G. W. StaplesA, C. T. ImadaA, W. J. Hoe,B and C. W. SmithC A – Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 U.S.A. B – deceased; C – Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K. Abstract. A revised and updated literature-based checklist of Hawaiian mosses is presented. Geographic coverage includes the eight main Hawaiian Islands; the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands are excluded. The checklist is alphabetically ordered by scientific names; the family is noted for each genus. Synonyms and misapplied names are cross-referenced to the accepted names. A bibliography of supporting references is included. Introduction cryptogamic plants—the mosses. Also in The Hawaii Biological Survey (HBS) was preparation by HBS staff members are checklists established as a program of Bishop Museum by and bibliographies for the Hawaiian anthocerotes the Hawaii State Legislature in 1992, specifically (hornworts) and hepatics (liverworts).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1, Chapter 7-10: Water Relations: Snow Ecology
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Water Relations: Snow Ecology. Chapt. 7-10. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological 7-10-1 Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Ebook last updated 17 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 7-10 WATER RELATIONS: SNOW ECOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Snow Effects ..................................................................................................................................................... 7-10-2 Snowbed Communities .............................................................................................................................. 7-10-4 Growth Form Variability .................................................................................................................. 7-10-10 Duration of Snowbeds....................................................................................................................... 7-10-13 Snowmelt ................................................................................................................................................. 7-10-13 Mechanical Effects ................................................................................................................................... 7-10-18 Freeze-thaw Cycles ......................................................................................................................................... 7-10-18 Winter Short-term Warming Events .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeen Mile Plain Reserve Supplement Contents Key
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Seventeen Mile Plain Reserve Supplement Contents Key Appendix A: Species Lists 3 ¤ = Previously recorded on the reserve and Fauna 4 found on this survey Vertebrates 4 * = New record for this reserve Birds 4 ^ = Exotic/Pest Frogs 5 # = EPBC listed Mammals 5 ~ = TSP listed Putative new species Reptiles 6 Previously recorded on the reserve but not found on Invertebrates 7 this survey Butterflies and Moths 7 Beetles 7 EPBC = Environment Protection and Biodiversity Thrips 8 Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) True Bugs 8 TSP = Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Grasshoppers 9 (Tasmania) Preying Mantises 9 Dragonflies 9 Millipedes 9 Spiders 10 Crustaceans 10 Snails and Slugs 10 Flora 11 Flowering Plants 11 Ferns and Fern Allies 12 Liverworts 13 Mosses 13 Appendix B: Rare and Threatened Species 15 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 17 2 Bush Blitz survey report — Tasmania 2010 Appendix A: Species Lists Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this appendix are consistent with that from the Australian Faunal Directory (AFD), the Australian Plant Name Index (APNI) and the Australian Plant Census (APC). Current at April 2012 Seventeen Mile Plain Reserve Supplement 3 Fauna Vertebrates Birds Family Species Common name Acanthizidae Acanthiza ewingii * Tasmanian Thornbill Calamanthus fuliginosus * Striated Fieldwren Sericornis frontalis * White-browed Scrubwren Sericornis humilis * Tasmanian Scrubwren Accipitridae Aquila audax # ~ Wedge-tailed Eagle Circus approximans * Swamp Harrier Alaudidae Alauda arvensis * Eurasian
    [Show full text]