DOCSLIB.ORG

I TOWARD a GRAMMAR of the BLOGOSPHERE: RHETORIC and ATTENTION in the NETWORKED IMAGINARY by Damien Smith Pfister B.A., Universit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I TOWARD a GRAMMAR of the BLOGOSPHERE: RHETORIC and ATTENTION in the NETWORKED IMAGINARY by Damien Smith Pfister B.A., Universit TOWARD A GRAMMAR OF THE BLOGOSPHERE: RHETORIC AND ATTENTION IN THE NETWORKED IMAGINARY by Damien Smith Pfister B.A., University of Alabama, 2000 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2004 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2009i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Damien Smith Pfister It was defended on January 16, 2009 and approved by Dr. Gregory Crowley, Coro Center for Civic Leadership Dr. John Lyne, Professor, Department of Communication Dr. Barbara Warnick, Professor, Department of Communication Dissertation Advisor: Gordon R. Mitchell, Associate Professor, Department of Communication ii Copyright © by Damien Smith Pfister 2009 iii TOWARD A GRAMMAR OF THE BLOGOSPHERE: RHETORIC AND ATTENTION IN THE NETWORKED IMAGINARY Damien Smith Pfister, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2009 This dissertation explores the rhetorical imaginary of internetworked societies by examining three cases where actors in the blogosphere shaped public deliberation. In each case, I analyze a trope that emerged organically as bloggers theorized their own rhetorical interventions, and argue that these tropes signal shifts in how citizens of networked societies imagine their relations. The first case study, on the blogosphere’s reaction to Trent Lott’s 2002 toast to Strom Thurmond, examines how bloggers “flooded the zone” by relentlessly interpreting the event and finding evidence that eventually turned the tide of public opinion against Lott. Flooding the zone signifies the inventional possibilities of blogging through the production of copious public argument. The second case study, focusing on the 2003 blogging of the Salam Pax, an English- speaking Iraqi living in Iraq on the precipice of war, develops the idea of “ambient intimacy” which is produced through the affective economy of blogging. The ambient intimacy produced through blogging illustrates the blurring of traditional public/private distinctions in contemporary public culture. The third case study, on the group science blog RealClimate, identifies how blogs have become sites for translating scientific controversies into ordinary language through a process of “shallow quotation.” The diffusion of expertise enabled by the interactive format of blogging provides new avenues to close the gap between public and technical reasoning. The dissertation concludes by examining the advent and implications of “hyperpublicity” produced by ubiquitous recording devices and digital modes of circulation. iv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v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vi C:C&!'3"04&"&*%!3'02%4&+%*+,#,$,!?J&#$'..,*.>&+6"$$'3&O/'!"!,'*>&"*4&$,.6!&.0%%*&7/#$,)& +76%0%+& @CI! )6"7!%0&I9)'*)$/+,'*& @IE! I:8&3%$)'5%&!'&!6%&*''+76%0%& @IE! I:=&!6%&#,0!6&'(&6?7%07/#$,),!?& @EC! I:@&06%!'0,)>&"0./5%*!"!,'*>&"*4&4%$,#%0"!,'*&,*&4,.,!"$&7/#$,)&)/$!/0%& @G=! #,#$,'.0"76?& @GI! vii LIST OF TABLES '#)%"!1E!6"''('7-!45*'",)"$5!6#$",'."-(-E7EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE2F! '#)%"!AE!<#-"!-'*0&!-"%"<'(+,!<$('"$(#!#66%("0!'+!,(,"!)%+5C;*"%"0!<$('(<#%!0(-<+*$-"!/+/",'-E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE:9! viii LIST OF FIGURES ;(5*$"!1E!#0@"$'(-"/",'!;+$!#0@#,'#5"!<+,-*%'#,'-EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 1GD! ;(5*$"!AE!!4.+<B"&!'"#/7!$"<+,-'$*<'(+,E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 9A8! ;(5*$"!9E!-<$"",-.+'!+;!!"#$%$&'#("))%+5!6+-'EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 9D1! ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A project of this duration has benefited from a powerful network of influences that I gratefully acknowledge. I have been lucky to be a member of the Communication Department at the University of Pittsburgh for the past seven years. The vibrant intellectual environment cultivated a space for students to experiment and take risks; at its best, the department represents a model for how to think about communication as a humanistic art. I am indebted to the numerous graduate school colleagues whose conversation and friendship over the years has so powerfully shaped my thinking. The financial support provided by an Andrew Mellon Predoctoral Fellowship from the University of Pittsburgh was instrumental in aiding completion of the project. I have also been fortunate enough to work closely with some stellar scholars and teachers in the course of my career. Pete Simonson, who served as a committee member early in my doctoral coursework, has been a real pal both intellectually and spiritually. Barbara Warnick was an excellent addition to my committee as I began working on my dissertation, and I have appreciated her insights all along the way. Greg Crowley’s perspective as a theorist and practitioner of public deliberation was a delightful addition as my project reached fruition. John Lyne was a committee member from the beginning, and his influence and encouragement have been sparkling throughout (despite the dubious influence of a certain Professor H.!) Gordon Mitchell, my advisor, deserves mountains of thanks for hours of frisbee-inspired theorizing, quesadilla-driven inspiration, passive voice-avoiding revisions, dacha-delivered mentoring, and continuing friendship. Gordon is the very model of the receptive, engaged, intense, and wise scholar that I aspire to. Though it might be odd, I’d also like to acknowledge a few places that were instrumental in pushing this project to fruition. The dissertation started to come together in various pubs in Edinburgh, Scotland, over the summer of 2008; a testament to the inspirational powers of good beer and company (and a probable explanation of whatever errors remain in the text). The proprietors of Arefa’s Espresso, Marie and Andrey Arefyeu, have built an oasis in Squirrel Hill that offers good coffee without corporate blandness or obnoxious patrons, for which I am all too thankful. I am indebted to my mother, Darlene Dorothy Smith, whose love and sacrifice along the way made it possible for me to even contemplate undertaking the intellectual path I now find myself on. For the countless hours she spent reading to me as a kid; the patience she showed when I exercised my argumentative skills; the spirit of curiosity and discovery she instilled in me; the gentle pushes and occasional prods; the encouragement and support; for all this and much more, I thank her. Finally, I want to thank Carly S. Woods, my favorite interlocutor, first editor, moral supporter, and, most importantly, partner. You, as they say, rock my socks. x CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION 1.1 Three (Rhetorical) Challenges for Public Deliberation A crowd gathers for a public debate on physician-assisted suicide. The debaters, at the front of the chamber, have diligently prepared their remarks and await the conclusion of the moderator’s introduction to wade into the finer points of the controversy. Finally, they get an opportunity to share their insights. Each debater, in turn, ranges over the basic points, skating around issues of consent, pain-ridden terminal illness,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blogosmear, Or, It's
    Blogosmear 21,341 words NOTE: the Table of Contents (TOC) is given in blog format. The posts are presented “as was.” © 2007 Hart Williams A Beauchamp Master List August 14th, 2007 @ 5:36 pm A Master List of my pieces in The Democratic Daily, as they relate to the Rightie blogosmear of Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp and The New Republic. In reverse chronological order: • Post # 6391 2007-08-14 7:39:37 am The Carolina Fabulist http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6391 • 6383 2007-08-12 2:45:11 pm Declaring Victory and Covering Their Tracks http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6383 • 6373 2007-08-10 6:25:38 pm The Smoking Pun http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6373 • 6372 2007-08-10 4:45:21 pm Sadists On Parade http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6372 • 6363 2007-08-08 8:29:37 pm The Media Drinks The Koolaid (Again) http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6363 • 6354 2007-08-07 12:33:17 pm Beauchamp - The Plot Thickens http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6354 • 6346 2007-08-05 4:08:36 pm Commander-In-Chief Slaps Combat Soldier? http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6346 • 6343 2007-08-04 12:01:01 pm Scandal! Pentagon or Blogosmear or Both? http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6343 • 6340 2007-08-03 4:09:30 pm Torquemada Goldfarb and the Fatwa Against Beauchamp http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6340 • 6305 2007-07-29 9:07:17 am Wingnut Smear on Columbia Journalism Review http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6305 • 6297 2007-07-27 3:30:09 pm Blogosmear, or, It’s WAR! http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6297 This represents my complete series of postings on the Private Scott Thomas Beauchamp Affair– thus far — the tale of a soldier in Iraq, who, writing anonymously for The New Republic , was ‘outed’ by the yowling of the top Right Wing blogs, and was investigated by the Army for UCMJ violations, at the behest of and choreographed blog firestorm by Weekly Standard BLOGGER Michael Goldfarb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of the Federalist Papers
    English-Language Arts: Operational Lesson Title: The Meaning of the Federalist Papers Enduring Understanding: Equality is necessary for democracy to thrive. Essential Question: How did the constitutional system described in The Federalist Papers contribute to our national ideas about equality? Lesson Overview This two-part lesson explores the Federalist Papers. First, students engage in a discussion about how they get information about current issues. Next, they read a short history of the Federalist Papers and work in small groups to closely examine the text. Then, student pairs analyze primary source manuscripts concerning the Federalist Papers and relate these documents to what they have already learned. In an optional interactive activity, students now work in small groups to research a Federalist or Anti-Federalist and role-play this person in a classroom debate on the adoption of the Constitution. Extended writing and primary source activities follow that allow students to use their understanding of the history and significance of the Federalist Papers. Lesson Objectives Students will be able to: • Explain arguments for the necessity of a Constitution and a bill of rights. • Define democracy and republic and explain James Madison’s use of these terms. • Describe the political philosophy underpinning the Constitution as specified in the Federalist Papers using primary source examples. • Discuss and defend the ideas of the leading Federalists and Anti-Federalists on several issues in a classroom role-play debate. (Optional Activity) • Develop critical thinking, writing skills, and facility with textual evidence by examining the strengths of either Federalism or Anti-Federalism. (Optional/Extended Activities) • Use both research skills and creative writing techniques to draft a dialogue between two contemporary figures that reflects differences in Federalist and Anti-Federalist philosophies.
    [Show full text]
  • Proseminar in American Politics Fall 2014
    GOV 2305: American Politics Field Seminar Fall 2017 Monday 2-4pm Location: Knafel 108 Instructors: Dan Carpenter: Office hours are Wednesdays, 1:15-4:15, CAPS Conference Room [email protected] Jennifer Hochschild: Office hours are Tuesdays, 2-4, CGIS K156 [email protected] The purpose of this course is to introduce doctoral students to the major themes and some of the best scholarship in the political science literature on American Politics. The readings for 2305 typically form the core of students’ subsequent reading lists for major or minor general exams in American politics. Still, there is much in the study of American politics that is not represented here, indeed that political scientists have failed to take up. Along the way, we will want to identify important but neglected questions. What issues should motivate the next generation of research in this field? What theoretical and methodological approaches might be appropriate to studying them? The most important requirement of the course is to read the assigned readings for each week carefully and critically. They will be the focus of our weekly discussions, though we will rarely be able to talk about them all. Nonetheless, please read all of them since your reading of some will affect your reading of others, whether in the current or some other week. More generally, the readings will provide us, as a group, with common terms of reference upon which good discussions will depend. To facilitate discussion, it is important that you write as well as read and think in advance about how the readings address the overall topic for that session.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers: a Primer
    7/6/2015 www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/5/celebrate­liberty­month­separation­of­powers­a­pri/print/ You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here. Separation of powers: A primer By Ryan J. Watson and James M. Burnham - - Sunday, July 5, 2015 Constitutional concepts like free speech or the right to bear arms are ingrained in our popular culture, but just 36% of Americans can name all three branches of the federal government.1 Even fewer understand why and how our Constitution allocates power among the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches. As we celebrate Liberty Month, it is worthwhile to review how the Constitution's separation of powers supplies a key bulwark protecting individual liberty in the world's most successful Republic. The Founders were familiar with human nature and the correlative tendency of every ruler towards tyranny. They had experienced oppression at the hands of the English King and realized that the only way to truly protect individual liberty was to limit the power of any single government official. James Madison, a central architect of the Constitution, rightly observed that if "men were angels, no government would be necessary." Federalist No. 51 (1788). He knew that every official or body would seek to accumulate "all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands," and that such a concentration would be "the very definition of tyranny." Federalist No. 47 (1788). Thomas Jefferson agreed, labeling such a concentration of power as "precisely the definition of despotic government." Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 13 (1784).
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Digital Rights Movement's Campaign for Privacy Efrat Daskal Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
    INTERNET POLICY REVIEW Journal on internet regulation Volume 6 | Issue 3 The Israeli Digital Rights Movement's campaign for privacy Efrat Daskal Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel Published on 19 Sep 2017 | DOI: 10.14763/2017.3.711 Abstract: This study explores the persuasion techniques used by the Israeli Digital Rights Movement in its campaign against Israel’s biometric database. The research was based on analysing the movement's official publications and announcements and the journalistic discourse that surrounded their campaign within the political, judicial, and public arenas in 2009-2017. The results demonstrate how the organisation navigated three persuasion frames to achieve its goals: the unnecessity of a biometric database in democracy; the database’s ineffectiveness; and governmental incompetence in securing it. I conclude by discussing how analysing civil society privacy campaigns can shed light over different regimes of privacy governance. Keywords: Privacy, Government surveillance, Biometric Article information Received: 03 Apr 2017 Reviewed: 03 Jul 2017 Published: 19 Sep 2017 Licence: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany Competing interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist that have influenced the text. URL: http://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/israeli-digital-rights-movements-campaign-privacy Citation: Daskal, E. (2017). The Israeli Digital Rights Movement's campaign for privacy. Internet Policy Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.3.711 Acknowledgements: I would like to thank the participants of the Early Stage Researchers Colloquium (ESRC) of the Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) from 2014 and especially Ulrike Hoeppner and Jörg Pohle for their insightful ideas and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age
    PREPRINT (Authors Version). The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Social Movement Studies (9.7.2015). DOI:10.1080/14742837.2015.1055722. Ulrich Dolata & Jan-Felix Schrape Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age This article investigates two questions: One, how might the very differently structured social collectives on the Internet – masses, crowds, communities and movements – be classified and distinguished? And two, what influence do the technological infrastructures in which they operate have on their formation, structure and activities? For this we differentiate between two main types of social collectives: non- organized collectives, which exhibit loosely-coupled collective behavior, and collective actors with a sepa- rate identity and strategic capability. Further, we examine the newness, or distinctive traits, of online- based collectives, which we identify as being the strong and hitherto non-existent interplay between the technological infrastructures that these collectives are embedded in and the social processes of coordina- tion and institutionalization they must engage in in order to maintain their viability over time. Conven- tional patterns of social dynamics in the development and stabilization of collective action are now sys- tematically intertwined with technology-induced processes of structuration. Keywords: Internet, collective action, social movements, digital communities, networks, socio-technical change Dolata/Schrape: Masses Crows, Communities, Movements Introduction From swarms and crowds to e-movements and e-communities, the Internet allows for new forms of collective behavior and action anywhere on the spectrum between indi- viduals and organizations. For example, online technologies allow for the aggregate compilation of consumer preferences, the obtaining of feedback from online shoppers and the use of social media (e.g., Facebook) or file-sharing platforms (e.g., The Pirate Bay).
    [Show full text]
  • Designing for Impact
    Social Justice Documentary Designing for Impact Jessica Clark, Center for Social Media, American University Barbara Abrash, Center for Media, Culture and History, NYU Research support Katie Donnelly, Elaine Kozma Design Manuela Garreton September 2011 www.centerforsocialmedia.orG With support from the Ford Foundation Table of contents Introduction 4 Evaluating Documentary, The State of the Field Why Now? 6 Current Methods 7 Missing Links 10 Case Studies 14 Case Study Takeaways 19 Appendix I (OWSHOULDFUNDERSANDºLMMAKERSINTEGRATE strategic design and evaluation? 23 Appendix II A Lion in The House 26 The Line 32 Lioness 39 Not In Our Town 46 Out In The Silence 53 State Of Fear: The Truth About Terrorism 59 Appendix III Related Visualizations 66 Appendix IV Resources 74 Introduction This working paper aims to synthesize current efforts to develop comparable EVALUATIONMETHODSFORSOCIALISSUEDOCUMENTARYºLMS!UTHOREDBYTWO RESEARCHERSWHOHAVEBEENJOINTLYDOCUMENTINGTHEºELD²STRANSFORMATIONOVER THEPASTºVEYEARS THISPAPEROFFERSAFRAMEWORKFORPLANNINGANDEVALUATING THEIMPACTOFTHESEºLMSINANETWORKEDMEDIAENVIRONMENT People come in as partic- TrackinG impact has become increasinGly complex as platforms and content ipants in a media project streams proliferate, and campaiGns evolve over several years. A sinGle piece of media can now spread across a variety of screens—a theater, a university and leave recognizing classroom, the Web, home televisions, a mobile phone and more. Each themselves as members screeninG carries with it different expectations, different measurement
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog
    The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog Lada A. Adamic Natalie Glance HP Labs Intelliseek Applied Research Center 1501 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 5001 Baum Blvd. Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT four internet users in the U.S. read weblogs, but 62% of them In this paper, we study the linking patterns and discussion still did not know what a weblog was. During the presiden- topics of political bloggers. Our aim is to measure the degree tial election campaign many Americans turned to the Inter- of interaction between liberal and conservative blogs, and to net to stay informed about politics, with 9% of Internet users uncover any differences in the structure of the two commu- saying that they read political blogs “frequently” or “some- times”2. Indeed, political blogs showed a large growth in nities. Specifically, we analyze the posts of 40 “A-list” blogs 3 over the period of two months preceding the U.S. Presiden- readership in the months preceding the election. tial Election of 2004, to study how often they referred to Recognizing the importance of blogs, several candidates one another and to quantify the overlap in the topics they and political parties set up weblogs during the 2004 U.S. discussed, both within the liberal and conservative commu- Presidential campaign. Notably, Howard Dean’s campaign nities, and also across communities. We also study a single was particularly successful in harnessing grassroots support day snapshot of over 1,000 political blogs. This snapshot using a weblog as a primary mode for publishing dispatches captures blogrolls (the list of links to other blogs frequently from the candidate to his followers.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Word on the President's Statutory Authority Over Agency Action
    ANOTHER WORD ON THE PRESIDENT’S STATUTORY AUTHORITY OVER AGENCY ACTION Nina A. Mendelson* By delegating to the “Secretary” or the “Administrator,” has Congress indicated an intent regarding presidential control of executive branch agencies? This seemingly simple interpretive question has prompted significant scholarly debate.1 In particular, if the statute names an executive branch agency head as actor, can the President be understood to possess so-called “directive” authority? “Directive” authority might be understood to cover the following situation: the President tells the agency head, “You have prepared materials indicating that options A, B, and C each satisfies statutory constraints and could be considered justified on the agency record. The Administration’s choice will be Option A.” The President could, of course, offer a reason— perhaps Option A is the least paternalistic, most protective, or most innovation-stimulating of the three. If the option preferred by the President otherwise complies with substantive statutory requirements on the record prepared by the agency,2 the question is whether the statutory reference to “Administrator” or “Secretary” should be understood as a limit on the President’s authority to direct the executive branch agency official to act in a particular way. A number of scholars have argued that statutory delegation to an executive branch agency official means that “the President cannot simply * Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School. Thanks for valuable discussion and comments especially to Kevin Stack, as well as to Philip Harter, Riyaz Kanji, Sallyanne Payton, Peter Strauss, and participants in symposia at Fordham Law School and Cardozo Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • A Canadian Primer to the 2012 Us Primaries and Caucuses
    A CANADIAN PRIMER TO THE 2012 US PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES A Policy Update Paper By Colin Robertson CDFAI Senior Research Fellow January, 2012 Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute 1600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 www.cdfai.org © Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute A CANADIAN PRIMER TO THE 2012 U.S. PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 Who’s running for the Republicans and what are their platforms? .................................. 3 Where do they stand? ........................................................................................................... 3 What’s the difference between a primary and a caucus? .................................................. 3 Is the process starting earlier than usual? ......................................................................... 3 Are the Iowa caucuses (January 3) important? .................................................................. 4 What about the Iowa Straw Poll held last August? ............................................................ 4 And the New Hampshire primary (January 10)? ................................................................. 4 Do the parties do their primary process differently? ......................................................... 5 Haven’t there been a lot more candidate debates? ............................................................ 5 Do the debates matter? ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wooster Sauce – March 2009
    Wooster Sauce – March 2009 I had wanted to tell the Master this and gladden his That is increasingly true in England and the rest of indulgent heart with the tribute being paid to him at this the Commonwealth, but not in India. While no English- outpost of Wodehouseana thousands of miles away language writer can truly be said to have a “mass” from any place he had ever written about. But I had following in India, where only a small percentage of the never been satisfied by any of my drafts of the letter. It population read English, Wodehouse has maintained a had to be just right. Of course, it never was, and now I general rather than a “cult” audience; unlike others, he would never be able to establish this small connection has never gone out of fashion. This bewilders those to the writer who had given me more joy than anything who think that nothing could be further removed from else in my life. Indian life, with its poverty and political intensity, than The loss was personal, but it was widely shared: the silly escapades of Wodehouse’s decadent P. G. Wodehouse was by far the most popular English- Edwardian Young Men in Spats. language writer in India. His erudite butlers, absent- India’s fascination with Wodehouse is one of those minded earls and silly-ass aristocrats, out to pinch endearing mysteries. Many believe that Wodehouse’s policemen’s helmets or perform acts of petty larceny at popularity reflects a nostalgia for the British Empire in the behest of tyrannical aunts, are beloved by most India.
    [Show full text]