DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the State Fiscal Year 2017-18 Executive Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on the State Fiscal Year 2017-18 Executive Budget Report on the State Fiscal Year 2017-18 Executive Budget February 2017 Message from the Comptroller February 2017 This year’s Executive Budget contains important new proposals including tuition-free access to higher education for thousands of additional students, and increased investment in clean water for New Yorkers. It would also boost investments for school aid, health care and capital projects. The Budget would reduce projected out-year budget gaps because of a proposed extension of the higher tax rate on upper-income earners and other actions, while also proposing significant new authorizations for borrowing. The $162.2 billion proposal comes at a time of significant risk involving the federal budget. It would rely on $54.3 billion in federal assistance, or one of every three dollars in total. Those resources help the State pay for essential investments in human services, transportation, education, environment and especially in health care. Federal Medicaid support has increased by billions of dollars as a result of the Affordable Care Act and other policy changes, and is projected to rise another $3.3 billion over the next four years. The current budget debate in Washington threatens much of that funding. Partly in response to such risk, proposed appropriations for school aid, Medicaid and numerous other local assistance programs would authorize the Director of the Budget to reduce available funds during the fiscal year if revenues – including but not only federal funds – are lower than projected. While the Executive historically has had certain powers to limit spending, this new proposal would extend such authority considerably. Other proposals would broadly authorize shifts of funds among State agencies and public authorities and between programs, further increasing the Executive’s ability to change the Budget after it has been approved by the Legislature. Such measures and certain others in the proposed Budget raise issues regarding checks and balances over key decisions on the use of the public’s dollars, the level of transparency and independent oversight associated with those choices, and the State’s accountability to taxpayers and stakeholders. As always, the level of funding provided for essential programs will be part of the budget debate in Albany this year. Each of these issues deserves close scrutiny and careful consideration. Thomas P. DiNapoli State Comptroller Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 II. FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW ........................................................................................... 4 State Fiscal Year 2016-17 ............................................................................................................. 4 State Fiscal Year 2017-18 ............................................................................................................. 6 Structural Imbalance .................................................................................................................... 10 Non-Recurring and Temporary Resources .................................................................................. 14 Settlements .................................................................................................................................. 14 Reserves ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Risks to the Financial Plan .......................................................................................................... 17 Transparency, Accountability and Oversight Issues ................................................................... 18 III. ECONOMY AND REVENUE ............................................................................................. 25 Economic Outlook ........................................................................................................................ 25 Revenue ...................................................................................................................................... 27 IV. DEBT AND CAPITAL ....................................................................................................... 35 Debt Outstanding and Debt Service ............................................................................................ 36 Capital Program and Financing Plan ........................................................................................... 40 New Debt Authorizations ............................................................................................................. 42 Debt Management and Potential Savings ................................................................................... 43 Dedicated Infrastructure and Investment Fund ........................................................................... 45 V. PROGRAM AREA HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................... 47 Education ..................................................................................................................................... 47 Higher Education ......................................................................................................................... 50 Health/Medicaid ........................................................................................................................... 52 Mental Hygiene ............................................................................................................................ 58 Human Services / Labor .............................................................................................................. 60 Transportation .............................................................................................................................. 62 Economic Development ............................................................................................................... 67 Housing ........................................................................................................................................ 70 Environment and Parks ............................................................................................................... 72 Agriculture .................................................................................................................................... 74 Energy.......................................................................................................................................... 75 Public Protection / Criminal Justice ............................................................................................. 76 Lottery and Gambling .................................................................................................................. 78 State Workforce ........................................................................................................................... 79 General State Charges ................................................................................................................ 80 Local Governments ...................................................................................................................... 82 New York City .............................................................................................................................. 84 Metropolitan Transportation Authority ......................................................................................... 85 Public Authorities ......................................................................................................................... 86 Other Issues ................................................................................................................................ 91 VI. APPENDICES................................................................................................................... 94 Appendix A: Multiyear Gap-Closing Plan ................................................................................... 94 Appendix B: Capital Spending Plan Comparison ....................................................................... 95 I. Executive Summary The State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2017-18 Executive Budget proposes new investments in education, higher education, Medicaid and certain other program areas while limiting growth in the costs of State agency operations. Capital investments in areas such as economic development, environmental protection and health would also increase. The Budget projects total All Funds spending of $162.2 billion in SFY 2017-18, up 3.8 percent from the current year. These figures include federal aid associated with the Affordable Care Act and disaster-related assistance, which the Division of the Budget (DOB) excludes from its primary presentation of $152.3 billion in All Funds spending. All Funds revenues in the coming year are projected at $160.4 billion, an increase of 4.4 percent. Although DOB has reduced its estimates of current-year tax receipts, it expects such revenues to rise by $4.2 billion or 5.6 percent in SFY 2017-18, in part because of the Executive’s proposal to extend a higher personal income tax (PIT) rate for upper-income earners for three years. Federal aid is projected to rise by $1.4 billion or 2.6 percent in the coming year and by an additional $3 billion over the following two years. Compared to DOB’s November 2016 revenue estimates, the Executive Budget reduces projections
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Road to Naples I Discovered Why Italian American Politicians Are Their Own Worst Enemies Published on Iitaly.Org (
    On the Road to Naples I Discovered Why Italian American Politicians are their Own Worst Enemies Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) On the Road to Naples I Discovered Why Italian American Politicians are their Own Worst Enemies Jerry Krase (January 15, 2016) Italian American politicians adhere to a corollary given by the 6th century BCE Chinese general Sun Tzu who wrote the Art of War. It was uttered by Michael Corleone in The Godfather Part II (1974): "My father taught me many things here — he taught me in this room. He taught me — keep your friends close but your enemies closer." My mother-in-law Rose Jordan-Nicoletti’s version of this Italian American proverb was “Don’t apologize! Your friends don’t need it and your enemies won’t believe it.” Page 1 of 4 On the Road to Naples I Discovered Why Italian American Politicians are their Own Worst Enemies Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) Both Mayor Bill DeBlasio and Governor Andrew Cuomo have deep family roots near Naples. Last week I went to the Universita degli Studi suor Orsola Benincasa in Naples to talk about, among other things, "Citizenship and Governance." Many would not believe it but Napoli is one of the best places in the world to learn about both topics. Walking around the city I could see how it works despite citizenship and governance. People say that Naples is chaotic and they are correct, but the chaos makes sense to its citizens and as a result their city simply "happens." Any attempt to control Neapolitans like traffic signals, anti-litter regulations, and even bicycle lanes have little effect on local life.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    Policy Brief Economic Development February 2017 New York State and its local governments currently spend approximately $9 billion annually on a broad array of economic development programs throughout the state (see chart on next page). There are dozens of different programs that provide a myriad of benefits, from cash grants to tax exemptions, tax credits (including many that are refundable and paid in cash), and tax-exempt bonds. The vast majority of these benefits go to big businesses in the name of job creation and economic growth, but the results leave much to be desired. Tax Incentives – A Failed Approach The state’s heavy reliance on tax incentives as an economic development strategy is a misguided approach, as after many decades there is little to show beyond a trail of political scandals. A detailed study of New York’s business tax credits prepared in 2013 by economists Donald Boyd and Marilyn Rubin for the Tax Reform Commission empaneled by Governor Cuomo, firmly stated that “there is no conclusive evidence from research studies conducted since the mid-1950s to show that business tax incentives have an impact on net economic gains to the states above and beyond the level that would have been attained absent the incentives.” The governor and the legislature should pay attention to the findings of this thorough analysis. At the same time that job-creation results have been meager, political scandals have been in abundance, centering around bid rigging of state contracts, transparency and accountability— issues that have not been substantively addressed, despite repeated media coverage. Lack of accountability, alone, is a problem; but it also masks the failings of these development programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Green, Union Jobs: Organizing at Buffalo's Tesla Factory
    Green, Union Jobs: Organizing at Buffalo’s Tesla Factory Rob Walsh, originally from a small town just outside Utica, is a material handler at the Tesla plant just south of Buffalo, New York’s downtown—dubbed Gigafactory 2—and part of the joint United Steelworkers/International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers organizing committee. One of plant’s earliest hires, he works 12-hour shifts three to four days a week, making $16.50 an hour. He is one of roughly 400 employees that work around the clock at the plant producing Tesla’s solar roof tiles. During those shifts, Walsh delivers production from the warehouse to the floor and then takes the finished product out to be shipped. In mid-2018, Walsh and his coworkers started talking about the need to organize after witnessing and experiencing what they perceived as favoritism. While the health insurance benefits are generally considered better than other employers in the area, the workers believe there is need for improvement and that the wages were lower than other comparable employers. “This isn’t my first manufacturing job. Some of my coworkers who have worked in manufacturing in this area, particularly in union shops, were like ‘well, a lot of people are getting paid a lot more in those other shops.’ Even compared to some other manufacturing jobs in the area that aren’t unionized, we’re still not getting paid as much as those other jobs. So we started thinking, ‘these people are being treated better than us, differently, we should do something about it,’” said Walsh, explaining how the conversations first started at the plant.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 State of the State
    2017 State of the State Greater Rochester International Airport JFK International Airport Second Avenue Subway Andrew M. Cuomo Governor New York State: Ever Upward 2017 State of the State Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Contents The Middle Class Recovery....................................................... 33 1. Jobs and Infrastructure ..................................................... 33 Part 1. Rebuilding and Reimagining New York Infrastructure ...................................................................................... 35 Proposal: Reimagine JFK International Airport for the Next Century of Growth ............................................................. 37 Proposal: Implement Round Two of the Successful Airport Economic Development and Revitalization Competition ..................................................................................... 41 Proposal: Invest in Long Island’s Transformation .......... 43 Proposal: Create the Town of Woodbury Transit and Economic Development Hub .................................................... 44 Proposal: Initiate New Study to Determine Viability of Tunnel Options to Transform Outdated I-81 Viaduct in Syracuse ............................................................................................ 46 Proposal: Build a New Amtrak Station at Schenectady . 47 Proposal: Expand Authority for Design-Build Contracting to Certain New York State Agencies and Public Authorities ......................................................................... 48 Proposal: Pass the New York
    [Show full text]
  • Moving the New New York Forward
    Moving the New New York Forward Andrew M. Cuomo Moving the New NY Forward Governor Andrew M. Cuomo i Moving the New NY Forward ii Moving the New NY Forward Moving the New NY Forward Table of Contents Introduction: A Record of Success ................................ ix Chapter 1. Continue to Attack the Property Tax Crisis ........................................................................................ 1 Getting New York’s Fiscal House Back in Order ............ 2 New York's High Property Taxes: Not a New Problem 4 Governor Andrew Cuomo: A Record of Fighting to Reduce New York's Property Taxes .......................................7 Property Tax Cap: An Historic Success .................................7 Property Tax Relief: Designed for Long-Term Restructuring and Tax Reduction ...........................................9 Governor Cuomo's Property Tax Plan: Provide Continued Tax Relief to New York Homeowners ....... 10 Proposal. Continue the State’s Fiscally Responsible Budgeting ....................................................................................... 10 Proposal. Extend the Property Tax Cap ............................. 11 Proposal. Create a $500 Million Fund to Encourage Localities to Cut Costs in Order to Reduce Property Taxes ................................................................................................ 11 Proposal. Organize a Summit of Local Leaders to Discuss Best Practices to Develop Tax Saving Plans .... 12 Chapter 2. New York is Working A Record of Success..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solarcity: the Risk Embedded in Buffalo's Billion
    6/30/16, 3:31 PM SolarCity: The Risk Embedded in Buffalo’s Billion Note: This post is also published on The Empire Center website. The decision by the nation’s largest solar panel provider to locate a state-of-the-art manufacturing plant in Buffalo, and to create other jobs in Western New York, could be a needed shot in the arm for a city and a region that’s been declining economically for many years. But there are significant risks and unanswered questions associated with the state government’s willingness to commit the bulk of its “Buffalo Billion” resources to the massive SolarCity factory on the site of the former RiverBend steel plant. A review of key documents for the project reveals the following: State taxpayers will be exposed to an unusually high degree of risk by the unprecedented structure of the SolarCity deal, under which Fort Schuyler Management Corp., a non-profit subsidiary of the State University’s College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, is building the factory for the company, and will retain ownership. SolarCity’s up-front capital investment in the project is thus limited, weakening its incentive to remain in Buffalo after its dollar-a- year lease of the building expires in 10 years. The project’s net employment impact has been greatly overstated. Some of the promised 5,000 new jobs to be generated in New York by the SolarCity project will be sales and installation positions that would be created in the state even if the same factory was successfully constructed and operated anywhere else in the world, while others will be jobs at other companies that are not parties to the jobs agreement between SolarCity and FSMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 262 Mar 17, 2021 Download
    THE NYC VACCINATION INFO, P15 INDYPENDENT #262: MARCH 2021 THE FALL OF LEIA DORAN LEIA SEX SCANDALS, COVIDANDREW COVER-UPS, HIS LIKELY SUCCESSORCUOMO & MORE BY JOHN TARLETON, P8 2 IN THIS ISSUE THE INDYPENDENT THE INDYPENDENT, INC. 388 Atlantic Avenue, 2nd Floor Brooklyn, NY 11217 212-904-1282 EVICTION NOTICE, P4 www.indypendent.org Crown Heights residents are fi ghting to save a longtime local grocery Twitter: @TheIndypendent store that faces an April 7 eviction date. facebook.com/TheIndypendent WRONGFUL CONVICTION, P6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Was the Brooklyn DA’s offi ce wrong about Ronnie Wright when they put him away on a murder rap? Ellen Davidson, Anna Gold, Alina Mogilyanskaya, Ann CRUELTY AS POLICY, P7 Schneider, John Tarleton Closing the subway system overnight to keep the homeless out is just one of the cruel policies the MTA has adopted during the pandemic. EDITOR-IN-CHIEF John Tarleton NO MO CUOMO, P8 Andrew Cuomo is the product of New York’s civic and media culture that CONTRIBUTING EDITORS elevates style over substance, attitude over aptitude. We deserve better. Ellen Davidson, Alina Mogilyanskaya, Nicholas WHO’S NEXT? P9 Powers, Steven Wishnia The governor’s departure would create new opportunities for a rising cohort of progressive leaders. ILLUSTRATION DIRECTOR Frank Reynoso TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE, P10 Take our Cuomo pop quiz and see how much you really know about DESIGN DIRECTOR New York’s chief executive. Mikael Tarkela TAX THE RICH, P12 Democratic socialists have been ramping up pressure on state legislators DESIGNERS to support higher taxes on the rich. And they’re getting results.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Supporting Role of SUNY Poly and FSMC in Buffalo Billion
    SUMMARY OF THE SUPPORTING ROLE BY THE STATE UNIVERISTY OF NEW YORK POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND FORT SCHUYLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION IN THE BUFFALO BILLION In 2012, Governor Andrew Cuomo announced a $1 billion investment (“Buffalo Billion”) in the Buffalo, New York region for economic development. Governor Cuomo tasked the Western New York Regional Economic Development Council (the “Council”) with forming working groups, including local stakeholders, to develop a strategic investment plan for the Buffalo Billion economic development program. Howard A. Zemsky (Managing Partner with the Larking Development Group) and Satish K. Tripathi (President of the University at Buffalo) co‐ chaired the Council. Neither SUNY Polytechnic Institute (“SUNY Poly”) nor Fort Schuyler Management Corporation (“FSMC”) then had, or currently have, representation on the Council. The Council engaged the Brookings Institution, McKinsey & Company, and the University at Buffalo’s Regional Institute to develop the requested strategic investment plan, and, in February of 2013, the Council published The Buffalo Billion Investment Development Plan (the “Plan”). Neither SUNY Poly nor FSMC participated as drafters of the Plan, and the Plan, consisting of 64 pages, does not mention FSMC and mentions SUNY Poly/CNSE only once as one of three sources of inspiration for the Council’s recommendation for the creation of the Buffalo Niagara Institute for Advanced Manufacturing Competitiveness. The Plan does not recommend the direction of any funding of the Buffalo Billion to SUNY Poly or FSMC or any of their programs or projects. The SUNY Poly/CNSE model was to be utilized in only two of the six initiatives to be implemented. Under the Plan, the Empire State Development Corporation (“ESD”) is identified as the delivery unit for implementing the Plan’s activities, including responsibility for managing budget requests.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT
    Case 18-2990, Document 211, 05/29/2019, 2574861, Page1 of 99 18-2990(L) 18-3710(CON), 18-3712(CON), To Be Argued By: 18-3715(CON), 18-3850(CON), 19-1272(CON) ALEXANDRA A.E. SHAPIRO IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT dUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, —against— PETER GALBRAITH KELLY, JR., MICHAEL LAIPPLE, KEVIN SCHULER, Defendants, JOSEPH PERCOCO, STEVEN AIELLO, JOSEPH GERARDI, LOUIS CIMINELLI, ALAIN KALOYEROS, AKA DR. K, Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT STEVEN AIELLO ALEXANDRA A.E. SHAPIRO DANIEL J. O’NEILL FABIEN M. THAYAMBALLI SHAPIRO ARATO BACH LLP 500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor New York, New York 10110 (212) 257-4880 Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Steven Aiello Case 18-2990, Document 211, 05/29/2019, 2574861, Page2 of 99 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT .......................................................................... 3 ISSUES PRESENTED ............................................................................................... 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .................................................................................. 4 A. Background ................................................................................................. 5 B. The
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT Docket Nos
    Case 19-1272, Document 55, 08/29/2019, 2643284, Page1 of 232 18-2990(L) 14-18-3710(CON),18-3712(CON), To Be Argued By: 18-3715(CON),18-3850(CON),19-1272(CON) MATTHEW D. PODOLSKY United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Docket Nos. 18-2990(L), 18-3710(CON), 18-3712(CON), 18-3715(CON), 18-3850(CON), 19-1272(CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, —v.— JOSEPH PERCOCO, STEVEN AIELLO, JOSEPH GERARDI, LOUIS CIMINELLI, ALAIN KALOYEROS, also known as Dr. K, Defendants-Appellants. PETER GALBRAITH KELLY, JR., MICHAEL LAIPPLE, KEVIN SCHULER, Defendants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GEOFFREY S. BERMAN, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Attorney for the United States MATTHEW D. PODOLSKY, of America. ROBERT L. BOONE, One St. Andrew’s Plaza JANIS M. ECHENBERG, New York, New York 10007 WON S. SHIN, (212) 637-2200 Assistant United States Attorneys, Of Counsel. Case 19-1272, Document 55, 08/29/2019, 2643284, Page2 of 232 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Preliminary Statement ....................... 1 Statement of Facts ........................... 6 A. The Bribery Trial ..................... 7 1. The Government’s Case ............. 7 a. Percoco’s Role and Power in State Government ............. 10 b. The CPV Scheme .............. 14 c. The COR Development Scheme .. 18 2. The Defense Case, Rule 29 Motions, and Verdict ...................... 24 B. The Fraud Trial ..................... 27 1. The Government’s Case ............ 27 a. Kaloyeros’s Role in the Buffalo Billion ....................... 28 b. The Buffalo Billion Scheme ....
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Billion Process and Implementation
    Buffalo Billion Process and Implementation Updated 11/24/15 Buffalo Billion Process and Implementation Page 2 of 14 Background In his 2012 State of the State Address, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo announced the bold and unprecedented Buffalo Billion initiative, conceived by the Governor to attract private sector investment and the creation of sustainable jobs based on the model that had successfully turned Albany into the worldwide leader of nanotechnology R&D and advanced manufacturing. The Buffalo Billion Investment Development Plan (BBIDP) was published in 2013 based on A Strategy for Prosperity , the Western New York Regional Economic Development Council’s 2011 Strategic Plan (WNYREDC Plan), which won one of four “Best Plan” awards and brought home an additional $100.3 million for the Western New York region in 2011. In addition, the WNYREDC Plan was awarded an Excellence in Economic Development Silver Award from the International Economic Development Council; and the 2014 Planning Excellence Award for Best Practice from both the Western NY Section of the American Planning Association (APA) and the APA NY Upstate Chapter. Expertise The Brookings Institution, McKinsey & Company, and the University at Buffalo’s Regional Institute (UBRI) were engaged to develop the BBIDP. These experts were primarily tasked with facilitating the planning process, gathering baseline data, engaging and sharing information with stakeholders, and developing strategies based on regional strengths and opportunities. Stakeholder Engagement – Planning & Research A Buffalo Billion Advisory Group was created to lead the development and implementation of the BBIDP. The group was co-chaired by the WNYREDC co-chairs, and several WNYREDC members served on the committee to ensure consistency with the WNYREDC’s strategic plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla, Panasonic to Make Solar Cells in Buffalo, New York 27 December 2016
    Tesla, Panasonic to make solar cells in Buffalo, New York 27 December 2016 Japanese electronics company Panasonic and said SolarCity will be held to job creation promises U.S. electric car maker Tesla said Tuesday they made when the state committed funding to build plan to begin production of solar cells at a factory and outfit the plant, which is expected to begin in Buffalo, New York. production next summer. The two companies said they finalized an © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. agreement calling for Tokyo-based Panasonic to pay capital costs for the manufacturing. Palo Alto, California-based Tesla made a "long-term purchase commitment" to Panasonic. Their statement gave no financial figures. The factory in Buffalo is under development by SolarCity Corp., a San Mateo, California-based solar panel company owned by Tesla. The photovoltaic cells and modules will be used in solar panels for non-solar roof products and solar glass tile roofs that Tesla plans to begin making, the announcement said. Production is due to begin in mid-2017. Tesla said it will create 1,400 jobs in Buffalo, 500 in manufacturing and plans further expansion in Buffalo. Panasonic also is to work with Tesla on next- generation technology, the companies said. New York state has committed $750 million to build and outfit the plant at Buffalo's RiverBend site, the centerpiece of Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo's "Buffalo Billion" program to revitalize the upstate region's largest city. SolarCity has committed to investing $5 billion over 10 years in New York state, hiring almost 1,500 workers at the Buffalo plant for five years and employing at least 2,000 more people across New York in exchange for use of the state-owned plant.
    [Show full text]