DOCSLIB.ORG

4 SKAGIT PROJECT TIME LINE 1917 191S 1919 1 -7 1924 ,937 1942 I94

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4 SKAGIT PROJECT TIME LINE 1917 191S 1919 1 -7 1924 ,937 1942 I94 •4 f SKAGIT PROJECT TIME LINE 1917 ScL receivea oermit -From US Deot= oi- Aqriculturs (US Forest Service) to build Skagit .dams. 191S Construction of low Gorge Dam starts. 1919 Newhalem dam construction starts. 1 -7 Newhalem dam produces power. 1924 Gorge construction completed and power produced. FPC issues license for Diablo Dam (Skagit Project #553) Work on Diablo Bam starts (world-'s tallest dam). Power prcdiuced from Diablo Dam (world's largest ope rat i nq hydroelsctr'i c generator > ,937 Roes (Ruby) Dam work starts. 1942 International Joint Coimmission (Canada/US) approves Ross Dam project Negotiations with Canada to allcw flooding of upper^ Skag i t by Ross Dam. (CAVNA J \o.r\ i94£ Reconstruction of Gorge Dam starts. Ross Dam produces power. High Ross construction f1rst p reposed, 1953 High Go r g s Dam starts. 1954 Canada over long—term flooding: of Lipperl^Skaqit areas — no agreement reached so annual negotiations r e q u i r e d. 1957 NCCC founded. 1961 Gorge High Dam completed. 1967 Seattle City Light attempts to negotiate a compensation schedule with British Columbia over flocding of the upper Skagit but does not receive forma1 agreement. Form5J__C£iilsideration of raisinq Ross Dam ba-gi no-. Hfl- tiU WpoZc^=^E^n^^5Tl R<hnTAjH>feAA3^ J JL '~\ NCCC begins formal ibpgosition. ^ "^o^eLO^ j WCNJP V>J&^ i:)(3 WJUXAA^^^/^CL is^\t A^ North Cascades National Park and Ross Lake Nat i Q na1 Rec reat ion Area estab1i s bed i o F-!un Duu ka.q iti SDD11 erS (KQ3S) fcunded> ROSS and Province of BC opposition increases. 1970 &-2 vote of Seattle City Council authorizes SCL to file for aimend.Tisnt of original FPC license to allow construction of High Ross. 1973 SCL Draft Environmental Impact Statement released 1974 F' u b 1 i c hearings - Administrative Law Judge hear i ngs 1977 FPC approves 1icense amendment to allow High Ross, Original FPC license r u ns out. Province of BC makes offer to SCL to sell replacement electrical generating capacity. SCL files application for new license for Skagit Project including High Ross 197i SCL files revised application for new license. NCCC/RQSS and others file appeals in Washington, D.C. District Court of Appeals. 1979 Agreement in concept on replacement power package. FPC accepts SCL license application — NCCC and others intervene. 1980 Court of Aopeals denies NCCC and other's appeal. NCCC "declares victory" and leaves the legal arena when deadline for final appeal to the US SuDreme Court e >; p i r e s. FBRC permit for High Ross Dam becomes effective, Province of BC appeals IJC 1942 decision. 1931 Interim Flow Agreement for fisheries signed. 19S2 IJC rejects BC appeal but places i-year moratorium on construction of High Ross. IJC estabiishes a Joi nt Consultat ive Group to faci1itate negotiat 1ons in good faith among part ies. ± 9S3 Agreement signed between Province of- BU \t Hydro and SCL). 1984 Formal ratification of agreement by Canada/US Treaty. BC sells hydropowe r to SCL. High Ross not built. Agreement duration until year 2066. S k a g i t E n v i r o n m e n t a1 Endowment Comm i e s i on established. NCCC Board Chairman Patrick D. Soldsworthy appoi nted^member of U.S. deleaation. 1988 FERC places SCL on timeline for completion of relicensing. 1991 Agreement among intervenors and SCL on mitigation package. Based on The Wild Cascades, various issues; Paul C. Pitzer, Buildino the Skagit, The Galley Press, Portland, OR, 1978; John C Gibson, "The Evolution of the High Ross Dam Settlement", Ihe_Ngrthwest_. Enylrc « Vol. I, No. 2, 1985;; Seattle City Light, Offer of Settlement: Skagit River Hydroeiectric Project FERC No. 553, April 1991; NCCC correspondence with Seattle City Light; and discussions with Tom Brucker, NCCC Board member and attorney, and Patrick D, Goldswcrthy, NCCC Chairman of the Board NCCC AND RELICENSING OF THE SKAGIT HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT k (FERC 4?D53) - ROUND II OT This is the -First o-f a three oart series oF artiptes on the Skagit HydrceTectic F'rcject - Round II. R ,. you will recall, began with NCCC opposition to rais ss Dam and •Further flooding Big Beaver valley and the ian Skagit, Details of that heroic battle are in orev sues of The NiJ-d Ca_Bc§ds;B and will be recounted in Harvey Manni no's forthcoming bocik. In Round II we discLxss the resumpt i on of negotiations with Seattle City Light <^CL) and t he " so good — successful mitigatio„ n pack-ao,e worked out for rel icensind^ This first i nst al Imenty^ b^^d^& at the ^^"'d^ 1itigation in the late 1970s, documents the resolution of the High Ross issue and describes the study stage of the present relicensing. The second instalIment wi11 review issues in the negotiatiorfS and the deveopment of NCCC strategy for the settlement o r o c e s s. The third i nstallment will cover the settlement and its implementetion. PART I NCCC emerged from its legal battles with the Federal Energy Regulatory CDfrimission (FERC) declaring victory in 1980. However, the nature of this victory was odd. Ne lacked a court decision blocking High Ross. FERC decided that High Ross Dam could be built. The expenses of the fray were substantia1 even with the generous heIp of 1awyers Rick A r ambu r u and Tom Brucker and the tireless techn i caI work of Eiick Brooks and Ted Beck. How was this a victcr-y? Because without NCCC intervention. High Ross Dam would have been built. However, due to passage of time and NCCC hammering on the lack of merit for the proposal, political and environmental ooposition in the U.S. and especially in Canada, had elevated the issue to an internationai level and forced reevaluation of the High Ross ^ {\jOyL<Jt'^ A decline in the rats of increase in energy demand and the availabi1ity of lower cost alternatives to High Ross construction worked in favor of rethink:ing the SCL 3-^ proposals. These arguments were essentially those maintained by NCCC in its years of dogged resistence fr*- the Seattle City Council, FERC, and the U.S. Court of Appeals. NCCC s voice of reason had to wait to be heard unti1 it was echoed by the uti1ity, city, and other "independent" (read non-conservationist) economists and eng ineers who eventually crafted the settle.ment. \m the beginning, the hasic NCCc position was the ollowino: High Ross wou 1 d be an environijvAnta 1 disaster for y^Ross^ Lake National Recreation Area^^^aed^he upper Skagit in d-04-CDu 2- There were o^^^^r, lower-co^j oations a^/ailable to Seattle City Liaht -For long—t'srTr~snergv' suooly than High Ross. ' ' ' ' " ^ 3. SCL energy deETiand projections were In-Flated and they overstated the need for High Ross. Can3.da would receive the brunt o-F flooding fro raising the"^ SLag-^i-t but i*ae getting very little compensation for its sacriticBS. ^ U^zn^C while it was not intended that wav, NCCC intervention to block High Ross on its merits resulted in sufficient delay for Canadian objections to feed into a change of governments in British Columbia. The new government refused to allow flocdino of the Skagit but was willing to negotiate a solution in the form of power supoL<Tp^.id for by Seattle City Light investement in hy'droelectfrio capacity in Canada. Anp1diec,,^ltsr native In the early 19S0s, emphasis was on achie-ving agreefTient bet'ween SCL and EC Hydro to avoid having to build High Ross. Everyone forgot that the Skag it Project relicsnsi ng was st111 i noomplete. The only act ion taken to mit igate the impacts of the operations of the projects was an interim flow agreement (1931) that sought to provide better conditions for anadromous fish in the Skagit. While important, this measure did not go very far to compensate for the wi1dlife, recreational, cultural and aesthetic losses duetto the three dams and reservoirs and, transmission corridc^p-^ fetlfe^ A good example of the kind of environmental damage that was being imposed by the Skagit Project could be seen in the enormous fluctuation (90-^- feet) of Ross reservoir._ In the mid~19S0s NCCC tried to get SCL to improve conditions for recreational activities and visual quality in Ro-ss ^e??r- reeervoir. Under '"normal" operations, the reservoir level was usually low at the beginning of fishing season and by Labor Day the reservoir was si ready on its way down. NCCC requested that SCL bring the lake level up ear 1ier and keep it high through the end of summer. NCCC >*ofei^be "informed" by SCL that there was not enough water in the system to accommodate recreational and aethet ic interests, but we always suspected thatCt^^y^i11ing the reservoir earlier meant the(t joverproduction of power during the wi nter and dropp i ng the reservoir i n the summ^r^ generated revenues from sale of power to California or other parts of the power grid. Fiscally, these SCL actions may have made sense but the real costs were to the environment and its other users, NCCC requests for evidence that alternat i ve reservoir operat Ion aqproaches were-H:nfeasibl e or too costly were met by SCL wTth excuses like* Jt costs too much to perform the ana1ysist we lack the cata to answer you r quest ion^y^jor, you would not underetand. (Mavbs we u n d e r e-1 o o d At i Internat ional Treatv In i9S4, Canada and the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flooding the Border: Development, Politics, and Environmental Controversy in the Canadian-U.S
    FLOODING THE BORDER: DEVELOPMENT, POLITICS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSY IN THE CANADIAN-U.S. SKAGIT VALLEY by Philip Van Huizen A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2013 © Philip Van Huizen, 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a case study of the 1926 to 1984 High Ross Dam Controversy, one of the longest cross-border disputes between Canada and the United States. The controversy can be divided into two parts. The first, which lasted until the early 1960s, revolved around Seattle’s attempts to build the High Ross Dam and flood nearly twenty kilometres into British Columbia’s Skagit River Valley. British Columbia favoured Seattle’s plan but competing priorities repeatedly delayed the province’s agreement. The city was forced to build a lower, 540-foot version of the Ross Dam instead, to the immense frustration of Seattle officials. British Columbia eventually agreed to let Seattle raise the Ross Dam by 122.5 feet in 1967. Following the agreement, however, activists from Vancouver and Seattle, joined later by the Upper Skagit, Sauk-Suiattle, and Swinomish Tribal Communities in Washington, organized a massive environmental protest against the plan, causing a second phase of controversy that lasted into the 1980s. Canadian and U.S. diplomats and politicians finally resolved the dispute with the 1984 Skagit River Treaty. British Columbia agreed to sell Seattle power produced in other areas of the province, which, ironically, required raising a different dam on the Pend d’Oreille River in exchange for not raising the Ross Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement
    Volume 26 Issue 2 U.S. - Canada Transboundary Resource Issues Spring 1986 The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement Jackie Krolopp Kirn Marion E. Marts Recommended Citation Jackie K. Kirn & Marion E. Marts, The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement, 26 Nat. Resources J. 261 (1986). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol26/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. JACKIE KROLOPP KIRN* and MARION E. MARTS** The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement SETTING AND BACKGROUND The Skagit River is a short but powerful stream which rises in the mountains of southwestern British Columbia, cuts through the northern Cascades in a spectacular and once-remote mountain gorge, and empties into Puget Sound approximately sixty miles north of Seattle. The beautiful mountain scenery of the heavily glaciated north Cascades was formally recognized in the United States by the creation of the North Cascades National Park and the Ross Lake National Recreation Area in 1968, and earlier in British Columbia by creation of the E.C. Manning Provincial Park. The Ross Lake Recreation Area covers the narrow valley of the upper Skagit River in Washington and portions of several tributary valleys. It was created as a political and, to environmentalists who wanted national park status for the entire area, controversial, compromise which accom- modated the city of Seattle's Skagit River Project and the then-planned North Cascades Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Hydroeiectirc Projects Continuation Sheet
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-O018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service skagit ^VQT & Newhalem Creek National Register of Historic Places Hydroeiectirc Projects Continuation Sheet Section number ___ Page ___ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 96000416 Date Listed: 4/26/96 Skagit River & Newhalem Creek Hvdroelectirc Projects Whatcom WA Property Name County State Hydroelectric Power Plant MPS Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Signature of tty^Keejifer Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Photographs: The SHPO has verified that the 1989 photographs accurately document the current condition and integrity of the nominated resources. Historic Photos #1-26 are provided as photocopy duplications. Resource Count: The resource count is revised to read: Contributing Noncontributing 21 6 buildings 2 - sites 5 6 structures 1 - objects 29 12 total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 16 . A revised inventory list is appended to clarify the resource count and contributing status of properties in the district, particularly at the powerplant/dam sites. (See attached) This information was confirmed with Lauren McCroskey of the WA SHPO. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Skagit River & Newhalem Creek National Register of Historic Places Hydroelectirc Projects Continuation Sheet Section number The following is a list of the contributing and noncontributing resources within the district, beginning at its westernmost—downstream—end, organized according to geographic location.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Heritage Project
    YOUTH HERITAGE PROJECT 2018 FINAL REPORT PARTNERS A huge thanks to our program partners for their significant financial and programmatic support for this year’s Youth Heritage Project! for the intrusion of the facilities within the Park. Students were able to witness a firsthand example NORTH CASCADES of this: all participants stayed at the North Cascades Institute’s Environmental Learning Center, which was constructed through mitigation funding as part NATIONAL PARK of a previous relicensing process. The relicensing process is once again being initiated. To take advantage of this real-world application, we The Washington Trust for Historic Preservation Within NOCA there is an active hydroelectric asked students to propose potential mitigation for held our seventh annual Discover Washington: project–a fairly unusual feature for a National Park. continuing operation of the hydroelectric project. Youth Heritage Project (YHP) this year at North These three dams, constructed from 1919-1960 prior We spent the first two days of YHP providing students Cascades National Park (NOCA). YHP continues to to establishment of the Park, still provide about with background information to aid their proposals, fulfill a long-standing goal of the Washington Trust 20% of Seattle’s electricity. Operation of the dams introducing students to both natural and historic to provide proactive outreach to and education for continues through a licensing agreement between resources within the Park. Students learned about young people. YHP is designed to introduce historic Seattle City Light and the Federal Energy Regulatory the establishment of the hydroelectric project and preservation to the younger generation, because in Commission. Periodically, Seattle City Light must the ongoing development of the Skagit River in the this next generation are the future leaders who will go through a relicensing process to continue twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Damnation of a Dam : the High Ross Dam Controversy
    THE DAMYIATION OF A DAM: TIIE HIGH ROSS DAM CONTROVERSY TERRY ALLAN SIblMONS A. B., University of California, Santa Cruz, 1968 A THESIS SUBIUTTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Geography SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY May 1974 All rights reserved. This thesis may not b? reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Terry Allan Simmons Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: The Damnation of a Dam: The High Ross Dam Controversy Examining Committee: Chairman: F. F. Cunningham 4 E.. Gibson Seni Supervisor / /( L. J. Evendon / I. K. Fox ernal Examiner Professor School of Community and Regional Planning University of British Columbia PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University rhe righc to lcnd my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed ' without my written permission. Title of' ~hesis /mqqmkm: The Damnation nf a nam. ~m -Author: / " (signature ) Terrv A. S.imrnonze (name ) July 22, 1974 (date) ABSTRACT In 1967, after nearly fifty years of preparation, inter- national negotiations concerning the construction of the High Ross Dan1 on the Skagit River were concluded between the Province of British Columbia and the City of Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES December 1969-January 1970 2 THE WILD CASCADES JXTOR/rH CASCADE3S TJTSTDIEiR. AT1 T_As.C> Je^ BATTLE LINES DRAWN by The Kerosene Kid duty it should have been to protect the park. Each such campaign has been accompanied by barrages of propaganda that the resources of the park were essential to the continued growth of the surrounding area or that new roads were needed along the wilderness beach or across the park's wilderness core "to open it up for the peepul. " Each time the friends of Olympic have rallied, mounted counter-attacks and saved the park. We have no reason to believe the history of the North Cascades over the next third of a century will be any different. But, to para­ phrase Mr. Churchill, the North Cascades Conservation Council (N3C) was not organized to preside over the dissolution of the North Cascades. We expect attacks and we confi­ dently expect to win. To prevent Seattle City Light from imple­ menting its destructive proposals in the Ross Lake National Recreation Area will require as If any conservationist felt he was honor­ tough a fight as conservationists ever have ably discharged from the wars upon passage waged. The nature of the adversary contrib­ of the 1968 North Cascades Act, he lacked utes to the difficulty of the battle. Seattle City knowledge of the history of the American Light is no ordinary despoiler of wilderness. National Park system. He may have said to In fact, it's hard to say just what Seattle City himself, "Whew! I'm glad that's over.
    [Show full text]
  • Ross Lake National Recreation Area Within North Q Baker Lake Cascades National Park Service Complex
    ' »* » « L i r * ' IwJ^I WM Mt. Shuksan of North Cascades National Park and Mt. Baker of Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest Welcome to National Park and National Forest lands of the North Cascades. Recreational Located east of 1-5, there are many opportunities for you to enjoy this area with easy access Opportunities from several major highways. Start in the north and take a drive on the Mt. Baker Scenic Byway page 2 (State Route 542). This route begins in Bellingham, winds along the North Fork of the Nooksack River, and, from the town of Glacier, climbs 24 miles to an elevation of 5,100 feet at Artist Point in Heather Meadows. This destination is legendary for spectacular views of Mt. Baker, Mt. Shuksan and surrounding peaks. For other stunning vistas, follow the northern part of the Cascade Loop along the North Cascades Scenic Highway (State Route 20). A side trip up the Baker Lake Road, 16 miles east of Sedro-Woolley, leads into the Baker Lake Basin, which features campgrounds, water recreation, and numerous trails. Trip Planning and Safety page 3 The 125-mile Skagit Wild and Scenic River System - made up of segments of the Skagit, Cascade, Sauk, and Suiattle rivers - provides important wildlife habitat and recreation. The Skagit River is home to one of the largest winter populations of bald eagles in the United States and provides spawning grounds for one-third of all salmon in Puget Sound. The North Cascades Scenic Highway winds east £ through the gateway communities of Concrete, D Rockport, and Marblemount before reaching Ross Lake National Recreation Area within North Q Baker Lake Cascades National Park Service Complex.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WILD CASCADES October - November 1970 2 the WILD CASCADES
    'Ha, Ha, Ha . And Not a Cloud in Sight' THE WILD CASCADES October - November 1970 2 THE WILD CASCADES SEATTLE PASSES THE ROSS DAM BUCK! Conservationists have tried for over a year to open the Seattle City Council's eyes to the fact that Seattle City Light has presented a very biased, one-sided story on the raising of Ross Dam. We have had to lobby the City Council and the Mayor from without the walls of City Hall while John Nelson has done his lobbying from within. A year ago the Seattle City Council voted 5 to 4 against the environment by authorizing City Light to proceed with its Ross High Dam plans. Today, one year and one Council election later, the vote was 6 to 2, still against the environment and now making it mandatory that City Light apply to the Federal Power Commission for permission to raise Ross Dam. It might have been 6 to 3 if Sam Smith had been present. (1) On December 19, 1970 Seattle City Light filed its Ross High Dam application with the F. P. C. (2) Immediately the North Cascades Conservation Council also filed with the F. P. C. , but in opposition to City Light's application. (3) The Federal Power Commission will hold hearings on High Ross in 1971 and 1972, possibly in Seattle (we shall let you know). (4) Washington State Department of Ecology will hold public hearings on raising Ross Dam (see page 36). (5) The Canadian Federal Government will conduct judicial hearings on the flooding of the upper Skagit by High Ross (see page 36).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Power License Fees
    Chelan River Hydroelectric Facility on Chelan River Report to the Legislature on Water Power License Fees Expenditures, Recommendations, Accountability, and Recognition June, 2020 Publication no. 20-10-027 Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/2010027.html For more information contact: Water Quality Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: 360-407-6600 Washington State Department of Ecology www.ecy.wa.gov Headquarters, Olympia 360-407-6000 Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 Southwest Regional Office, Olympia 360-407-6300 Central Regional Office, Union Gap 509-575-2490 Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 ADA Accessibility The Department of Ecology is committed to providing people with disabilities access to information and services by meeting or exceeding the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 504 and 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, and Washington State Policy #188. To request an ADA accommodation, contact Ecology by phone at 360-407-6600 or email at [email protected]. For Washington Relay Service or TTY call 711 or 877-833-6341. Visit Ecology’s website for more information. Publication 20-10-027 June 2020 i Report to the Legislature on Water Power License Fees Expenditures, Recommendations, Accountability, and Recognition by Water Quality Program Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia,
    [Show full text]
  • North Cascades National Park Plan
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Business Management Group North Cascades National Park 2012 Business Plan Produced by Sunrise at Copper Lookout. National Park Service Business Management Group Table of Contents U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Spring 2012 2 INTRODUCTION National Park Business Plan Process 2 Letter from the Superintendent 3 Introduction to North Cascades National Park The purpose of business planning in the National Park Service (NPS) is to improve the ability of parks to more clearly 4 PARK OVERVIEW communicate their financial and operational status to principal 4 Orientation stakeholders. A business plan answers such questions as: What 5 Mission and Foundation is the business of this park unit? What are its priorities over 6 Resources the next five years? How will the park allocate its resources to 7 Visitor Information achieve these goals? 8 Personnel 9 Volunteers The business planning process is undertaken to accomplish three 10 Partnerships main tasks. First, it presents a clear, detailed picture of the state 12 Strategic Goals of park operations and priorities. Second, it outlines the park’s 14 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW financial projections and specific strategies the park may employ to marshal additional resources to apply toward its operational 14 Funding Sources and Expenditures needs. Finally, it provides the park with a synopsis of its funding 15 Division Allocations sources and expenditures. 16 DIVISION OVERVIEWS 16 Facility Management 18 Resource Management
    [Show full text]
  • Fingertip Facts
    FINGERTIP FACTS To Bothell MISSION SERVICE AREA Substation Seattle City Light is dedicated to delivering customers affordable, AND reliable and environmentally responsible electricity services. SUBSTATIONS Shoreline VISION We resolve to provide a positive, fulfilling and engaging experience for our employees. We will expect and reinforce Viewland-Hoffman leadership behaviors that contribute to that culture. Our workforce is the foundation upon which we achieve our public service goals North and will reflect the diversity of the community we serve. We strive to improve quality of life by understanding and Canal answering the needs of our customers. We aim to provide University more opportunities to those with fewer resources and will Lake Washington protect the well-being and safety of the public. Denny Broad We aspire to be the nation’s greenest utility by fulfilling our Puget East Pine mission in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. Sound Union VALUES Massachusetts SAFETY – The safety of our employees and customers is our highest priority South ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP – We will enhance, protect Delridge and preserve the environment in which we operate Substations INNOVATION – We will be forward-focused and seek new, Seattle City Limits innovative solutions to meet the challenges of tomorrow Duwamish EXCELLENCE – We strive for fiscal responsibility and Creston-Nelson excellence in employee accountability, trust and diversity CUSTOMER CARE – We will always promote the interest of our customers and serve them reliably, ethically, transparently and with integrity 1 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT | FINGERTIP FACTS FINGERTIP FACTS | SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 2 GENERAL INFORMATION CUSTOMER STATISTICS The most current data available for the year ended December 31, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA Index, 1987-1996, Volumes 1
    COLUMBIA The Magazine of Northwest History index 1987-1996 Volumes One through Ten Compiled by Robert C. Carriker and Mary E. Petty Published by the WashingtonState Historical Society with assistancefrom the WilliamL. DavisS.J Endowment of Gonzaga University Tacoma, Washington 1999 COLUMBIA The Magazine of Northwest History index 1987-1996 Volumes One through Ten EDITORS John McClelland, Jr., Interim Editor (1987-1988) and Founding Editor (1988-1996) David L. Nicandri, ExecutiveEditor (1988-1996) Christina Orange Dubois, AssistantEditor (1988-1991) and ManagingEditor/Desi gner (1992-1996) Robert C. Carriker, Book Review Editor ( 1987-1996) Arthur Dwelley, Associate Editor( 1988-1989) Cass Salzwedel, AssistantEditor (1987-1988) ArnyShepard Hines, Designer (1987-1991) Carolyn Simonson, CopyEditor ( 1991-1996) MANAGEMENT Christopher Lee, Business Manager (1988-1996) Gladys C. Para, CirculationManrtger (1987-1988) Marie De Long, Circulation Manager (1989-1996) EDITORIAL ADVISORS Knute 0. Berger (1987-1989) David M. Buerge (1987-1990) Keith A. Murray ( 1987-1989) J. William T. Youngs (1987-1991) Harold P. Simonson (1988-1989) Robert C. Wing (1989-1991) Arthur Dwelley (1990-1991) Robert A. Clark (1991) William L. Lang (1991-1992) STAFF CONTRIBUTORS Elaine Miller (1988-1996) JoyWerlink (1988-1996) Richard Frederick (1988-1996) Edward Nolan (1989-1996) Copyright © 1999 Washington State Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission fromthe publisher. ISBN 0-917048-72-5 Printed in the United States of America by Johnson-Cox Company INTRODUCTION COLUMBIA's initial index is the result of a two-year collaborative effort by a librarian and a historian. Standards established by professionals in the field were followed.
    [Show full text]