3. Natural Gas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3. Natural Gas UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Department of Earth Sciences Geovetarcentrum/Earth Science Centre Unconventional gas and oil - in the USA and Poland Jakub Leśniewicz ISSN 1400-3821 C90 Project Göteborg 2012 Mailing address Address Telephone Telefax Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum 031-786 19 56 031-786 19 86 Göteborg University S 405 30 Göteborg Guldhedsgatan 5A S-405 30 Göteborg SWEDEN Unconventional gas and oil – in the USA and Poland Jakub Leśniewicz, University of Gothenburg, Department of Earth Sciences; Geology, Box 460, SE-405 30 Göteborg Abstract Despite the fact that the exploitation of natural gas from unconventional deposits is much more difficult and less economically viable than from the conventional reservoirs, they are now a very attractive target. This is due to the gradual depletion of conventional resources, and large deposits of natural gas in unconventional reservoirs, which previously were not known or there was no technology that allows to explore them. Coalbed methane , tight gas and shale gas have been successfully developed in the United States over the past two decades. The initial increase in the production of unconventional gas, shale gas in particular, was then maintained through the use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, as well as an increase in gas prices. Production of shale gas has a greater deposits potential, while lower productivity and higher cost of drilling, as compared to conventional gas, which is associated with a more cautious investment strategies. Shale gas exploration strategies are also different from those of conventional gas and, initially, require an extensive source rock analysis and a big land position to identify “sweet spots”. Searching for shale gas in Poland is focused on the formation of the Silurian- Ordovician age that are poorly diagnosed and thus characterized by a high exploration risk. Therefore, exploration companies have used a cautious approach which is reflected in planning of the concession activities divided in a few phases, with each successive phase contingent on the positive results of the preceding one. These phases include analysis of existing data, seismic surveys, exploratory drilling with an extended analysis of the cores prior to using horizontal drilling. On a technical level of shale gas exploration, the integration of many disciplines is required for commercial success. There are several obstacles to the exploration of shale gas in Poland, including: regulations which are in favor of the domestic service companies impeding competition, changeable and unclear environmental protection regulations, as well as insufficient liberalization of the domestic gas market. Keywords: Unconventional gas, unconventional oil, USA, Poland ISSN 1400-3821 C90 2012 5.2.9. Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) ........................................................ 30 6. Environmental concerns ....................................................................................................... 31 6.1. Risk of shallow freshwater aquifer contamination, with fracture fluids ....................... 31 6.2. Risk of surface water contamination, from inadequate disposal of fluids returned to the surface from fracturing operations ....................................................................................... 31 6.3. Risk of surface and local community disturbance, due to drilling and fracturing activities ............................................................................................................................... 32 6.4. Risk of atmosphere contamination ................................................................................ 32 6.5. Earthquakes ................................................................................................................... 33 7. Shale gas in Europe .............................................................................................................. 34 7.1. Shale gas in Poland ....................................................................................................... 35 7.1.1. Geological condition .............................................................................................. 37 7.1.2. Risks and problems ................................................................................................ 40 8. Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 43 9. Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………...44 10. Figures and tables ............................................................................................................... 44 11. References .......................................................................................................................... 46 1. Introduction In view of diminishing stocks of hydrocarbons in Poland, as well as few new areas of exploration, a study of lesser known or ignored resources is called for. To diagnosis, and extract, these unconventional resources it is necessary to develop research methods and technology that will assist in their exploitation. Shale gas is natural gas contained in the organic diagenetic silt-clay rocks, with very low porosity and very low permeability. A characteristic feature of shale gas, that sets it apart from conventional natural gas accumulations, is a lack of spontaneous flow of gas to a drilled well in quantities in which exploitation would be economically justified. By the end of the 80s accumulations of this type have not been the object of particular interest to explorers. In the last two decades, the increase in oil prices and the invention of new technologies, with lower cost of horizontal drilling and treatments that stimulate the gas flows into the well, a steady growth in world natural gas production from such deposits is seen. The importance of unconventional reserves in the world is increasing constantly. In the United States - a country with the most developed oil industry, the focus on unconventional sources of hydrocarbons - shale gas resources constitute a significant part of the total recoverable natural gas resources. But, new discoveries is rapidly increasing this percentage. Shale gas production in 2006 was almost three times higher than in 1996. Besides American companies, only a few large international companies can today efficiently exploit these deposits. One obstacle is the high costs of drilling horizontal wells at great depths (often in excess of 3 km) and complicated and expensive hydraulic fracturing rock technologies (creating artificial cracks). This new “fracking” technique creates a network of fractures, spreading concentrically from the hole, even for a few hundred meters, in order to connect as big a volume as possible of the rock with the hole. 1 2. Hydrocarbons Hydrocarbons are organic compounds consisting of carbon and hydrogen atoms. The carbon atoms form a skeleton to which the hydrogen atoms are connected by bonds. Because of the differences in carbon skeleton we are able to distinguish several kinds of hydrocarbons. In petroleum, the most relevant ones are alkanes (CnH2n+2), naphthanes (CnH2n) and aromatics (CnH2n-6). The first two groups are called saturated because of the single bonding between carbon atoms hence there is no possibility to connect another atom. The third group comprise compounds which have multiple bonding between carbon atoms, therefore considered unsaturated, and other components can be joined. Under normal surface conditions hydrocarbons can occur in different physical states. It depends on the molecular weight of each compound. The lightest ones like methane or ethane always appear as gases. Some of the aromatic hydrocarbons may be liquids, while the heaviest among occur as solids. The light alkanes and nephthanes may change their physical state to liquid or even solid if subjected high pressure and temperature. Hydrocarbons originate from organic matter, subjected to anaerobic conditions and diagenetic temperatures for millions of years. 2.1. Fossil fuels There are three main types of fossil fuels: coal, crude oil and natural gas. Basically, the processes of creation are similar for all of them, though some factors indicates differences between them. All fossil fuels require extremely long periods of time to be created, under elevated pressure and temperature and absence of oxygen. Favorable geological conditions in turn are necessary so the fossil fuels may migrate and concentrate. All of the elements listed above together are called a petroleum system. It encompasses also geological processes like trap formation and generation-migration-accumulation of hydrocarbons (fig. 1.) [Magoon & Beaumount, 2003]. The organic remains are buried under sediment layers in sedimentation basin as a source rock. Then during millions of years the organic matter goes through numbers of chemical and physical processes and finally changes into hydrocarbons. After this happened hydrocarbons migrate using pores and openings in rock to a reservoir rock where they accumulate. 2 Fig. 1. Scheme of hydrocarbons reservoir creation [a] In order to prevent them from further migration there must exist a barrier or seal above and around them of impermeable rock. Shale, anhydrite, salt and mudstone are usual seal rocks. Hydrocarbons might be trapped also by structural traps (fig. 2.). These include such features as folds (e. g. anticlines), salt domes or tilted fault blocks. Fig. 2. Different types of structural traps [Wang & Economides,
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province
    Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 By Catherine B. Enomoto1, James L. Coleman, Jr.1, John T. Haynes2, Steven J. Whitmeyer2, Ronald R. McDowell3, J. Eric Lewis3, Tyler P. Spear3, and Christopher S. Swezey1 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192 2 James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 3 West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, WV 26508 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin
    DOE/NETL-2011/1478 A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors greatly thank Daniel J. Soeder (U.S. Department of Energy) who kindly reviewed the manuscript. His criticisms, suggestions, and support significantly improved the content, and we are deeply grateful. Cover. Top left: The Barnett Shale exposed on the Llano uplift near San Saba, Texas. Top right: The Marcellus Shale exposed in the Valley and Ridge Province near Keyser, West Virginia. Photographs by Kathy R. Bruner, U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Bottom: Horizontal Marcellus Shale well in Greene County, Pennsylvania producing gas at 10 million cubic feet per day at about 3,000 pounds per square inch.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States Margaret E. Walker-Milani West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Walker-Milani, Margaret E., "Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3327. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3327 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States Margaret E. Walker-Milani THESIS submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Richard Smosna, Ph.D., Chair Timothy Carr, Ph.D. John Renton, Ph.D. Kathy Bruner, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Mapping and Reservoir Analysis of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2014 Regional Mapping and Reservoir Analysis of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin Jared VanMeter West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation VanMeter, Jared, "Regional Mapping and Reservoir Analysis of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin" (2014). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 634. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/634 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regional Mapping and Reservoir Analysis of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin Jared VanMeter Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Richard Smosna, Ph.D., Chair Kathy Bruner, Ph.D. Tim Carr, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2013 Keywords: Marcellus, Petroleum, Sequence Stratigraphy Copyright 2014 Jared VanMeter ABSTRACT Regional Mapping and Reservoir Analysis of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin Jared VanMeter The main purpose of this investigation is to define the distribution of organic-rich facies of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Stratigraphy and Petroleum Systems of the Appalachian Basin, North America
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS SERIES U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP I–2768 SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST 85° W 80° W 75° W INTRODUCTION In addition to the major packages of siliciclastic rocks, there are two minor packages Age 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 General Age of siliciclastic rocks that were deposited at approximately 480 to 475 million years North North Although more than 100 years of research have gone into deciphering the ago (St. Peter Sandstone) and at approximately 389 to 387 million years ago (million Features (million Periods Epochs American American East- North- North- Central Eastern Western Eastern South- South- Central North- Northern Western South- East- South- South- North- North- North- Southern Western West- East- Sequences Sequence Periods 45° N 45° N Paleozoic stratigraphy of the Appalachian Basin of North America, it remains a (Oriskany Sandstone). These two minor packages of siliciclastic rocks are present years central east west Tenn. Tenn. Va. Ky. west east W.Va. west W.Va. Md. east central west east east west central Ontario N.Y. central central Boundaries (Interpreted years Lake challenge to visualize the basin stratigraphy on a regional scale and to describe within predominantly carbonate strata and they are not associated with significant Series Stages Huron Events) ago) WISCONSIN stratigraphic relations within the basin. Similar difficulties exist for visualizing and fining-upwards or coarsening-upwards trends. Furthermore, these siliciclastic rocks ago) Ala. Ala. Ga. W.Va. W.Va. W.Va.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marcellus Shale: Erosional Boundary and Production Analysis, Southern West Virginia, U.S.A
    THE MARCELLUS SHALE: EROSIONAL BOUNDARY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, U.S.A. by Mallory Stevenson November, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Donald W. Neal Major Department: Geological Sciences The Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale is a natural gas producing formation that was deposited in the Appalachian foreland basin in what is now eastern North America. An unconformity truncates the Marcellus in southern West Virginia and progressively younger units onlap progressively older units. The zero isopach line that marks the edge of the Marcellus is mapped to reveal the southeastern boundary. A well production analysis is conducted to locate the region of maximum natural gas production. Four lithologic completions intervals in three different well fields are compared. This study shows that the most economically viable drilling is from the Marcellus Shale completion intervals that are less than 30 feet in Chapmanville gas field in western Logan County, West Virginia. Outside of the zero isopach are areas comprised of onlapping featheredges of younger formations that comprise a black shale unit mistakenly identified as “Marcellus Shale.” These areas produce significantly less gas than the “true” Marcellus Shale. THE MARCELLUS SHALE: EROSIONAL BOUNDARY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, U.S.A. A Thesis Presented To the Faculty of the Department of Geological Sciences East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Geology by Mallory Stevenson November, 2015 © Mallory Stevenson, 2015 THE MARCELLUS SHALE: EROSIONAL BOUNDARY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, U.S.A. by Mallory Stevenson APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: ______________________________________ Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • REVISION of the UPPER DEVONIAN in the CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy
    REVISION OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN IN THE CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy Roderic Ian Brame Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences Richard K. Bambach, Chair John M. Dennison J. Thomas Dutro, Jr. Kenneth A. Eriksson John Pojeta, Jr. Stephen Scheckler December 16, 2001 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Devonian, Biostratigraphy, Frasnian/Famennian Extinction, Stratigraphy Copyright 2001, Roderic Ian Brame REVISION OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN IN THE CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy Roderic Ian Brame (ABSTRACT) The Upper Devonian of the central-southern Appalachians Valley and Ridge province of Virginia lacks stratigraphic resolution, revised formal nomenclature, and detailed biostratigraphic data. Eight of the most complete sections available in a three thousand square mile area were used to build a framework for revising the stratigraphy of the Upper Devonian strata in southwestern Virginia. Detailed lithologic descriptions of about four thousand feet (1.3 km) of rock were made at each outcrop. John Dennison’s (1970 and 1976) nomenclature for the Upper Devonian along the Alleghany Front was successfully tested for it usefulness in Southwestern Virginia and are hereby applied to these rocks. The stratigraphic interval ranges in age from the Middle Devonian to the Lower Carboniferous. The stratigraphic units include the Middle Devonian Millboro Shale, the Upper Devonian Brallier, Scherr, Foreknobs (formally the "Chemung"), Hampshire, and the Lower Carboniferous Price Formation. The Brallier contains two members (Back Creek Siltstone and Minnehaha Springs), the Foreknobs is divided into five members (Mallow, Briery Gap, Blizzard, Pound, and Red Lick), and the lower Price is divided into three members (the Cloyd Conglomerate, Sunbury Shale, and the Ceres).
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Cogenetic Iron and Clay Deposits in the Central Appalachian Region
    DISTRIBUTION OF COGENETIC IRON AND CLAY DEPOSITS IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN REGION by Mary Karandosovski McGuire B.S. Geology, The Pennsylvania State University, 1973 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Mary Karandosovski McGuire It was defended on March 30, 2012 and approved by Daniel Bain, Associate Professor, Faculty Charles Jones, Lecturer, Faculty Thesis Director: Thomas H. Anderson, Professor Emeritus, Faculty ii Copyright © by Mary K. McGuire 2012 iii DISTRIBUTION OF COGENETIC IRON AND CLAY DEPOSITS IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN REGION Mary K. McGuire, M.S. University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Maps of more than 500 abandoned iron mines, 350 early iron furnaces, and numerous clay mines in the central part of the Appalachian region reveal the distribution and close association of siderite-limonite bearing ores and clay deposits. The deposits crop out from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania to Scioto County, Ohio, a distance of more than 300 miles. The geologic settings of the deposits are diverse. In the Valley and Ridge Province and Piedmont Province, mineralization follows structures such as major sub-horizontal thrust faults (e.g. Martic) and steep thrust faults, (e. g. Path Valley), that juxtapose carbonate units against other rocks. Carbonate units within the Plateau Province also contain economic deposits of iron ores and clay. The ores are commonly siderite and limonite principally in the form of nodules and other irregular masses in clayey, calcareous beds.
    [Show full text]
  • FTG-9: What The
    What the H!? Paleozoic Stratigraphy Exposed Regional Stratigraphy and Structure in the Central Appalachians from the Ordovician to the Pennsylvanian as seen in new outcrops along US 48 (“Corridor H”) and other locations Pre-Meeting Field Trip Guide for the 46th Annual Meeting Eastern Section of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (ESAAPG) Morgantown, West Virginia September 24 and 25, 2017 Field Trip Leaders and Authors Paula J. Hunt1, Ronald R. McDowell1, B. Mitch Blake, Jr.1, Jaime Toro2, Philip A Dinterman1 1 West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, 1 Mont Chateau Rd., Morgantown, WV 26508 2 Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, PO Box 6300, Morgantown, WV 26506 CoverImages Top:Tonolowayroadcutforeground,quarrybackgroundalongUS48 Middle(lefttoright):SenecaRocks,“Dragon’sTongue,”PaleoseismitesinSpechtyKopfFormation (Dintermanforscale) Bottom(lefttoright):US48(“CorridorH”),OldReedsville/MartinsburgquarryonUS33,FieldTrip RouteonGeologicMap PhotosinthisreportweretakenbyWVGESpersonnelunlessnotedotherwise. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Mont Chateau Research Center 1 Mont Chateau Road • Morgantown, WV 26508-8079 304.594.2331 • fax: 304.594.2575 www.wvges.org • [email protected] 39q39’30” N, 79q50’57” W Suggested citation: Hunt, P.J., R.R. McDowell, B.M. Blake, Jr., J. Toro, and P.A. Dinterman, 2017, What the H!? Paleozoic Stratigraphy Exposed,Pre-Meeting Field Trip Guide for the 46th Annual Meeting, Eastern Section of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists
    [Show full text]
  • GSA 2017 Poster Final Web
    Cross Sections From The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership: Visualizng Subsurface Carbon Storage Opportunities Across The Central And Eastern United States Philip A. Dinterman1, Jessica Pierson Moore1, J. Eric Lewis1, Stephen F. Greb2, Kenneth G. Miller3, William J. Schmelz3 1West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey, 1 Mont Chateau Rd, Morgantown, West Virginia 26508, [email protected], 2University of Kentucky, 3Rutgers University ABSTRACT A In the fourteen years following creation of the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) domestic energy A` production and CO2 point-source trends in the United States have experienced tremendous changes. Increasing use of natural gas as a source of electrical generation, coupled with the rise of renewable technologies, resulted in the closing of many coal-fired power plants. The coal-fired plants that remain open must now strike a balance between competitive economics and an increasingly climate-conscious public. These challenges necessitate a continued comprehensive, nation-wide, investigation of2 CO mitigation strategies, including carbon storage in deep saline aquifers as well as enhanced recovery of oil and natural gas via CO2 floods. In support of these efforts, MRCSP is characterizing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) opportunities across a ten state-region in the central and eastern United States. Updating and packaging the existing database of petroleum fields in the region has been one of the Area of interest, with locations of multi- major MRCSP tasks of the West Virginia Geological and Economic channel seismic proles and wells & Survey (WVGES) across this region. coreholes available in region. Wells & Coreholes WVGES is also working with other MRCSP researchers to construct a set Continental Oshore Stratigraphic Test wells Individual well depth are in feet below Atlantic Section kelly bushing.
    [Show full text]
  • a Subsurface Study of the Oriskany Sandstone in Eastern Ohio and Surrounding Areas Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Re
    A SUBSURFACE STUDY OF THE ORISKANY SANDSTONE IN EASTERN OHIO AND SURROUNDING AREAS PRESENTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE ,. By Mary Beth Rafalowski The Ohio State University Winter 1982 APPROVED BY: Project kavisor Department of Geology and Mineralogy TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction. 1-2 Purpose of Study. 3 Methods of Study. 4 Radiation Logs and Their Interpretation • 4-6 Geologic History. • 7-8 Stratigraphy. • 9-12 Entrapment of Hydrocarbons • • 12 Structural • • 12-14 Stratigraphic • 14-15 Paleogeomorphic • 15-16 Porosity and Permeability • 16-17 Origin and Migration of Hydrocarbons • 18 Conclusion. 19 Appendix A - Core and Cutting Descriptions • 21-27 Appendix B - Subsurface Data used in Preparation of Maps, Gramma rays, Neutron Logs. 28-29 Appendix C - Subsurface Date of Core and Cutting Descriptions 30-31 Acknowledgments. • 32 References 33-34 Introduction Because the value of oil and gas has increased drastically over the last few years, it has become more economically feasible to locate small gas and oil pools which were once passed over for larger producing areas. Smaller "pay zones" are now becoming important once again in Ohio's oil and gas industry. Natural gas is found in structural and stratigraphic traps in the Oriskany in Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Although it is primarily a gas producing formation, some high grade oil has been produced. The Oriskany is represented throughout the Appalachian area, extending eastward from an irregular North-South line reaching from Cuyahoga County, Ohio to the corner of Kentucky, Ohio and Virginia. It continues eastward, in the subsurface, until it outcrops in north western New York State, eastern West Virginia a~d Virginia.
    [Show full text]