religions Article How Avoiding the Religion–Politics Divide Plays out in Sikh Politics Pashaura Singh Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;
[email protected] Received: 15 March 2019; Accepted: 24 April 2019; Published: 28 April 2019 Abstract: This article looks at the intersection of religion and politics in the evolution of the Sikh tradition in the pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial periods in the Indian subcontinent. The Sikh notion of sovereignty is at the heart of the intersection of religious and secular domains, and this relationship is examined empirically and theoretically. In particular, the conception of m¯ır¯ı-p¯ır¯ı is presented as a possible explanation for understanding the ‘new developments’ in contemporary Sikh politics in India. Keywords: Akal Takhat; British Raj; halem¯ı raj;¯ Khalsa; m¯ır¯ı-p¯ır¯ı; religion and politics; secularism; SGPC; Akali Dal; Punjab 1. Introduction The purpose of this essay is to look at the changing dynamics of the intersection of religion and politics at various historical junctures in the evolution of the Sikh tradition, thereby understanding the more recent developments in Sikh politics in the Punjab. Notably, the distinction between the public and private spheres did not exist in the early Sikh tradition prior to the colonial rule of the early 19th century. The Sikh Gurus mediated the two spaces as one. For them and for societies of that time in India, this division did not exist. This is the same division as between religion and politics, or between church and state. In recent studies, “religion” is not considered simply a belief system or a purely interior impulse secreted away in the human soul and limited to the private sphere, or an institutional force separable from other non-religious or secular forces in the public domain.