B R I E F I R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

B R I E F I R IRMO Institut za razvoj i međunarodne odnose Institute for Development and International Relations I R M O Ured u Zagrebu B R E F 02 2021 I Montenegro after the General Elections: A New Chapter in Transition or Preservation of Status Quo? By Krševan Antun Dujmović Introduction with the European Union, making it a harbinger among Western Balkans nations on the path The general elections held in Montenegro to Euro-Atlantic integrations, especially as the on 30 August 2020 has once again drawn the country had joined the North Atlantic Alliance attention of the Western Balkans to the smallest, in June 2017. Other countries in the region measured by population, among seven nations linger behind Montenegro – Albania and North that emerged after the breakup of the Socialist Macedonia, both NATO members, are still Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. This attention waiting for the opening of the negotiations with is due to a number of factors. Back in May of the EU. Serbia has no intention to join NATO, 2018 Montenegro has opened the last of the and in spite of EU negotiations and ambitions, thirty-three chapters in the negotiation process sees itself in balance between the West on one IRMO BRIEF 02/2021 1 side, and Russia and China on the other. Kosovo the geopolitical chessboard. Considering these and Bosnia and Herzegovina are far from NATO factors, the attention of neighbors to the events membership and have merely the status of in this Balkan country is understandable. The potential candidates for EU membership. This unfolding situation after the elections in which is why all eyes of the region and of the advocates the government of Montenegro is backed by a of continuation of EU enragement policy are very thin majority in the Parliament (Skupština on Montenegro. The second factor are strong Crne Gore) and with no clear vision nor strategy historical ties of this country on the Adriatic for further political and economic development coast with its northern neighbor Serbia. Serbian of the country, is only fueling the wariness of its minority makes up to one third of Montenegro’s neighbors and of Brussels about Montenegro as population, and the Serbian Orthodox Church a success story. (SPC- Srpska Pravoslavna Crkva) plays a vital role in Montenegrin society, as this country Thorny transition in Montenegro does not have its own autocephalous Church recognized by other Orthodox Churches in Until the 30 August general election Eastern Christendom. This gives Serbia and Montenegro was ruled in continuum by the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro its southern neighbor. The third factor is the the SPC a significant clout within borders of (DPS - Demokratska partija socijalista Crne involvement of global players in this country. Gore), a party formed as a legal successor of The United Sates has advocated strongly to the Communists Party of Montenegro. For this include Montenegro in NATO in order to stretch reason many point out that Montenegro was ruled for 75 years by the same communist or Mediterranean from the Iberian Peninsula to the line of NATO’s southern flank in the Northern reformed-communist political elite and the that the west to Greece and Turkey in the east. On the other hand, Montenegro’s authorities accused formal transition, while the old structures from Russia of meddling in the general elections held the country went only through a superficial, the communist past remained to be in power in October 2016 when the alleged coup d’état occurred on the election day. Many feared a and pro-EU image of the DPS. Furthermore, similar scenario on the eve of 30 August 2020 only camouflaged under the new pro-Western election, fathoming the outbreak of riots and president of Montenegro to the present day. violence that could ignite the powder keg in the president of the DPS Milo Đukanović is the the Balkans. Although none of these happened, now serving his second presidential term, Montenegro is not ceasing to be the subject of Đukanović was elected as president in 2018, and since 1991 he also served four terms as IRMO BRIEF 02/2021 2 prime minister of Montenegro. For this reason, curb organized crime. Powerful drug cartels the sluggish transition in Montenegro was for based in Montenegro’s Bay of Kotor can trace their origins to the cigarette trafficking in the nineties when Montenegro and Serbia formed many embodied in the very political figure of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Pressed Milo Đukanović. Montenegro was ruled for 75 by a considerable and influential Serbian years by the same communist or minority in the country, the DPS ruled by reformed-communist political the adequate balance of power in running elite and went only through a Milo Đukanović was always forced to create the country. Well-know and traditional superficial, formal transition. Montenegrin opportunism also took its toll. Regardless of the country’s proclaimed pro- Western orientation, Montenegro continued non-disputable, however it is his adamant Đukanović’s political longevity and talent are to nourish its strong and historical links with persistence to embody the highest political Russia. power in Montenegro that has enticed very different political parties in Montenegro Regardless of the country’s in joining forces before and during the 30 proclaimed pro-Western orientation, August elections - in order to topple the rule Montenegro continued to nourish its strong and historical links with of Đukanović and the DPS. On the other hand, to its independence in the 2006 referendum Russia. Đukanović’s determination to lead Montenegro and the Euro-Atlantic integration is beyond dispute. However, his critics claim that these This was made evident in 2011 when the ambitions were purely pragmatic and not an DPS and Putin’s United Russia party signed an agreement on cooperation. Furthermore, Russian capital has sprawled around the expression of genuine beliefs, as Đukanović’s until 1997. And in spite of Montenegro’s country, Russian tycoon Oleg Deripaska was was the closest ally of Slobodan Milošević success to be the champion of EU integration involved in the privatization of the aluminum among six countries of the Western Balkans, smelter near the capital Podgorica and many this progress is marred by many failures. The Russian nationals settled in the country. For country is regularly criticized by the European all these reasons Montenegro has fallen short Commission due to its frail efforts to tackle in its attempts to become “Monte Carlo of nepotism, omnipresent corruption and to the Balkans’’, embroiling itself in a strain of IRMO BRIEF 02/2021 3 corruption scandals and distancing itself from The lities were guided by the SPC, namely the structural reforms and genuine transition on leader of the Orthodox Church in Montenegro, the path to EU membership. Archbishop of Cetinje and Metropolitan Law on Religion as a trigger of change of Montenegro and the Littoral Amfilohije Radović. After decades of close friendship and At the very beginning of 2020 things looked alliance with Milo Đukanović, top cleric of the after the 30 August general election due to the stable for the DPS as the ruling elite was SPC Radović, who passed away just two months consequences of Covid-19 infection, turned bracing itself for yet another victory on general into a bitter adversary of the Montenegrin elections. Notwithstanding, the situation had president. The stumbling stone of the Law changed dramatically with the adoption of the were articles 61, 62 and 63 in the Law totaling “Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief and Legal 66 articles, and especially the provision saying Status of Religious Communities”. The Law was that “religious buildings and land used by adopted on 27 December 2019 in Montenegrin the religious communities in the territory of Parliament, and came into force a day after Montenegro which were built or obtained from Christmas that is observed in Montenegro on public revenues of the state or were owned by 7 January. In spite of government’s intention the state until 1 December 1918, and for which to pass the bill into law smoothly, the adoption there is no evidence of ownership by the of the Law stirred strife in the Parliament, and religious communities, as cultural heritage of soon after its adoption protests broke out in Montenegro, shall constitute state property.” almost every city in Montenegro. The protests The SPC interpreted these articles of the Law as where organized in Orthodox processions called an attack and an attempt to seize its properties lities (litije), and every week tens of thousands from it on different locations of Montenegro. of protestors took to the street, in a nation of As the presence of the Orthodox Church in just 630 thousand inhabitants. Montenegro dates back to medieval times, many of documents proving the ownership were lost The protests where organized in during the Ottoman rule as the Ottoman Turks Orthodox processions called lities frequently targeted Orthodox monasteries as (litije), and every week tens of centers of Montenegrin rebellion against their thousands of protestors took to rule. Among these properties that are in the the street. Motenegrin monasteries Cetinje, Ostrog and SPC’s possession are, among others, flagship IRMO BRIEF 02/2021 4 Opposition wins by a narrow margin near the coastal city of Petrovac, ideal for Morača, and a parcel of land in Buljarica The 30 August general elections have caught the DPS on the wrong foot, and the opposition development of tourist projects. Amfilohije task in mobilizing protestors in January 2020 parties managed to win 41 seats in the 81 Radović and the SPC did not face a difficult as Orthodoxy is deeply rooted in Montenegrin members Parliament. Even so, the DPS has nation which for centuries lived in theocratic remained the party with the strongest support society, ruled by leaders called “vladika”, who of the voters, winning over 35% of the popular embodied at the same time both spiritual and votes.
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of the National Integrity System of Montenegro
    ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO This project is supported by the European Union. The content of this does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the author ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Title: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Publisher: Network for affirmation of NGO sector - MANS Monitoring and Analytic Programme Authors: Vanja Ćalović, Executive Director Vuk Maraš, Monitoring and Analytic Programme Director Aleksandar Maškovic, Analytic Programme Coordinator Veselin Radulovic, MANS’ Legal Advisor Print: 3M - Makarije Edition: 30 copies Contact: Dalmatinska 188, Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: +382 20 266 326 Fax: +382 20 266 328 E-mail: [email protected] www.mans.co.me CONTENTS I INTRODUCTORY NOTE ........................................................................................................................... 7 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 III ABOUT THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESMENT .............................................. 21 IV COUNTRY PROFILE OF MONTENEGRO ..................................................................................... 27 V CORRUPTION PROFILE ......................................................................................................................... 31 VI ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Guidebook
    MONTENEGRO PREFACE Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, lies in a broad plain crossed by five rivers and surrounded by mountains, just 20 kilometers from the Albanian border. The city has a population of around 180,000 people. Bombed into rubble during World War II, Podgorica was rebuilt into a modern urban center, with high-rise apartment buildings and new office and shopping developments. While the latest Balkan war had a low impact on the physical structures, the economic sanctions had a devastating effect on employment and infrastructure. With the help of foreign investment, urban renewal is evident throughout the city, but much of it may still appear run down. Podgorica has a European-style town center with a pedestrian- only walking street (mall) and an assortment of restaurants, cafes, and boutiques. To many, its principal attraction is as a base for the exploration of Montenegro’s natural beauty, with mountains and wild countryside all around and the stunning Adriatic coastline less than an hour away. This is a mountainous region with barren moorlands and virgin forests, with fast-flowing rivers and picturesque lakes; Skadar Lake in particular is of ecological significance. The coastline is known for its sandy beaches and dramatic coves: for example, Kotor – the city that is protected by UNESCO and the wonderful Cathedral of Saint Typhoon; the unique baroque Perast; Saint George and Our Lady of the Rock islands – all locations that tell a story of a lasting civilization and the wealth of the most wonderful bay in the world. The area around the city of Kotor is a UNESCO World Heritage site for its natural beauty and historic significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Inputs from the Government of Montenegro
    INPUTS FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO The activities led by the Government of Montenegro in the past have been recognised as an example of good practices to be followed in the region. Hereby you may find all relevant information in chronological order that address the activities, law measures, best practices in terms of law enforcement and LGBT Strategy measures aimed to fight the violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity. The inputs are divided into two parts. First part consists of measures and activities including projects and relative publications and the second one is about legislation. I PART: Measures and activities - In September 2011, the Government of Montenegro was the first state in the Western Balkans to host an International Conference on LGBT rights and freedoms. Further information about the Conference “Toward Europe, Toward Equality” are available at: http://www.gov.me/en/homepage/Conference_Toward_Europe_Toward_Equality - Montenegro was the first beneficiary state in the Council of Europe’s project “Combating discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity”, which began with the realization in September 2011 and lasted until the end of 2013. The project aimed to support countries involved in the preparation of measures and the implementation of actions in the fight against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, in order to implement the Recommendation CM / Rec ( 2010 )5. A number of conferences and training were held that had the purpose to heighten visibility and improve the quality of life for LGBT persons. Those included the governmental conferences, meetings with the representatives of the Council of Europe along with the participation of civil society, panel discussion on multiple discrimination supported by William Institute, UCLA School of Law and the Conference on the LGBT rights where representatives of 11 governments of the region took part.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. EGP Recommendation Letter URA Montenegro
    Civic Movement URA (United Reform Action) Application for EGP Membership EGP Committee Recommendation Letter General Introduction The European Green Party (EGP) conducted a study visit in August 2019 and a fact-finding mission in early March 2020, as part of the application process of Montenegrin political party URA (United Reform Action). URA has officially applied for EGP membership in October 2019. The EGP has been in contact with URA since 2018. Since then, their party leader attended the Council in Berlin (Germany) in November 2018. After their application, a delegation was invited to the following Council in Tampere (Finland) in November 2019. In August 2019, the study visit included meetings with different structures of URA, activists from NGOs and civil society, supporting citizens movements and struggles with several cases of environmental destruction. The visit showed that URA is a well-established party, respected and in cooperation with civil society, and with a potential to grow. In March 2020, the EGP delegation to Montenegro was made up of Thomas Waitz (Co-Chair), Mar Garcia (Secretary General) and Mélanie Vogel (Member of the Committee responsible for Montenegro). This mission included meetings with the central leadership and Political and Advisory board of URA, their Youth and Women Forum, several local councillors and the local board in Budva. Other meetings were organized with EU Ambassador Orav Aivo and German Ambassador Robert Weber, NGOs Hocu da ostanem and Kor - Coalition for Sustainable Development, LGBT Forum Progress, the chief editor of Balkan Insight, and a Professor of International Environmental and Private Law at the State Law university.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision of the Citizens of Montenegro to Live in an Independent and Sovereign State of Montenegro, Made in the Referendum Held on May 21, 2006;
    Stemming from: The decision of the citizens of Montenegro to live in an independent and sovereign state of Montenegro, made in the referendum held on May 21, 2006; The commitment of the citizens of Montenegro to live in a state in which the basic values are freedom, peace, tolerance, respect for human rights and liberties, multiculturalism, democracy and the rule of law; The determination that, as free and equal citizens, persons belonging to nations and national minorities living in Montenegro: Montenegrins, Serbs, Bosnians, Albanians, Muslims, Croats and others, we are loyal to the democratic and civil state of Montenegro; The conviction that the state is responsible for the preservation of nature, sound environment, sustainable development, balanced development of all its regions and the establishment of social justice; The dedication to cooperation on equal footing with other nations and states and to the European and Euro-Atlantic integrations, the Constitutional assembly of the Republic of Montenegro, at its third meeting within the second regular session in 2007, held on October 19, 2007, adopts 1 THE CONSTITUTION OF MONTENEGRO PART ONE BASIC PROVISIONS The State Article 1 Montenegro is an independent and sovereign state, with the republican form of government. Montenegro is a civil, democratic, ecological and the state of social justice, based on the rule of law. Sovereignty Article 2 Bearer of sovereignty is the citizen with Montenegrin citizenship. The citizen shall exercise power directly and through the freely elected representatives. The power that is not stemming from the freely expressed will of the citizens in the democratic elections, in accordance with the law, shall not be established nor recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • 08.Association-Montenegro.Pdf
    Association for the Advancement of political, cultural and economic Cooperation between Montenegro, the Republic of Serbia and Republika Srpska Podgorica, Montenegro H.E. Аhmed Shaheed UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief Your Excellency, Encouraged by your invitation to, inter alia, civil society organisations to submit contributions to your thematic report on the elimination of intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief and the achievement of a sustainable development goal 16, we are free to inform you about drastic forms of intolerance and discrimination in legislation and practices in Montenegro, as well as about the effects of such discrimination. Although the focus of your interest is on minority religious communities, as well as on vulnerable groups such as women and girls, indigenous peoples, and refugees and migrants, we are still of the opinion that developments in Montenegro, since the adoption of the new Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief and the Legal Status of Religious Communities, due to the discriminatory effects of that law, the practice of extreme intolerance shown by the Montenegrin authorities towards the Serbian Orthodox Church dioceses in that state and the potential escalation of the crisis, deserve your special attention and care and it is a negative example that should be reflected in your report for the 75th session of the UN General Assembly. At the very beginning of our contribution, we would like to draw your attention to a few, in our opinion, extremely important facts in the context of which the information we will provide in this text could be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro's Constitution of 2007 with Amendments Through 2013
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 constituteproject.org Montenegro's Constitution of 2007 with Amendments through 2013 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 Table of contents Preamble . 7 PART 1: BASIC PROVISIONS . 7 Article 1: The State . 7 Article 2: Sovereignty . 7 Article 3: State territory . 7 Article 4: State symbols . 7 Article 5: Capital and Old Royal Capital . 8 Article 6: Human rights and liberties . 8 Article 7: Prohibition of infliction of hatred . 8 Article 8: Prohibition of discrimination . 8 Article 9: Legal order . 8 Article 10: Limits of liberties . 8 Article 11: Division of powers . 8 Article 12: Montenegrin citizenship . 9 Article 13: Language and alphabet . 9 Article 14: Separation of the religious communities from the State . 9 Article 15: Relations with other states and international organizations . 9 Article 16: Legislation . 9 PART 2: HUMAN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES . 10 1. COMMON PROVISIONS . 10 Article 17: Grounds and equality . 10 Article 18: Gender equality . 10 Article 19: Protection . 10 Article 20: Legal remedy . 10 Article 21: Legal aid . 10 Article 22: Right to local self-government . 10 Article 23: Environment . 10 Article 24: Limitation of human rights and liberties . 11 Article 25: Temporary limitation of rights and liberties . 11 2. PERSONAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES . 11 Article 26: Prohibition of death penalty . 11 Article 27: Bio-medicine . 11 Article 28: Dignity and inviolability of persona . 11 Article 29: Deprivation of liberty . 12 Article 30: Detention .
    [Show full text]
  • Agata Domachowska Montenegro: a New Government
    Editorial Team: Beata Surmacz (Director of ICE), Tomasz Stępniewski (Deputy No. 297 (200/2020) | 08.12.2020 Director of ICE), Agnieszka Zajdel (Editorial Assistant), Aleksandra Kuczyńska-Zonik, Jakub Olchowski, Konrad Pawłowski, Agata Tatarenko ISSN 2657-6996 © IEŚ Agata Domachowska Montenegro: A new government On December 4, 2020, the new government of Montenegro was elected, headed by Zdravko Krivokapić. For the first time in almost three decades, the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro (Demokratska partija socijalista Crne Gore, DPS) – the political party the current President of Montenegro Milo Đukanović comes from – has not formed the government. The new prime minister announced that it would be a government focused on introducing profound changes in the country. European integration, cooperation within NATO, and the recovery of the economy after the crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic remain a priority. However, a minimal government majority in the Montenegrin Parliament and the actual friction between the coalition partners may seriously complicate the functioning of the new government. A long process of forming a new government. On September 9, 2020, shortly after the announcement of the results of the August parliamentary elections, the leaders of the three electoral lists (“For the future of Montenegro”, “Peace is our nation”, and “Black on White”) signed an agreement to form a joint government. They also announced the principles of future cooperation: continuation of NATO membership, continuation of the European integration process, undisputed recognition of Kosovo’s independence and not introducing changes to Montenegro’s national symbols. Moreover, shortly after the elections, the leaders of the three opposition coalitions agreed that the new government would be a government composed of experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro - OECD Republic of Montenegro
    Sigma Public Management Profiles No. 6 Serbia and Montenegro - OECD Republic of Montenegro https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmk186gh6hl-en SIGMA Support for Improvement in Governance and Management A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PROFILES OF WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO (as of November 2003) For easier reference, separate Profiles have been established for the State Union level of Serbia and Montenegro, the Republic of Montenegro, and the Republic of Serbia. The province of Kosovo is governed, since June 1999, by the UN Interim Mission to Kosovo. A separate Profile of Kosovo follows the three Profiles of Serbia and Montenegro. 1 THE SIGMA PROGRAMME The Sigma Programme — Support for Improvement in Governance and Management — is a joint initiative of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Sigma supports partner countries in their efforts to improve governance and management by: • Assessing reform progress and identifying priorities against baselines which reflect good European practice and existing EU legislation (the acquis communautaire); • Assisting decision-makers and administrations in building institutions and setting up legal frameworks and procedures to meet European standards and good practice; • Facilitating donor assistance from the EU and other donors inside and outside Europe by helping to design projects, ensuring preconditions and supporting implementation. Sigma’s working partners are governments in: • Most EU candidate countries — Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey. • Western Balkan countries — Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro / Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • Embassy Podgorica, Montenegro, November 2009 1
    SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED United States Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors Offi ce of Inspector General Report of Inspection Embassy of Podgorica, Montenegro Report Number ISP-I-10-10A, November 2009 IMPORTANT NOTICE This report is intended solely for the offi cial use of the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors, or any agency or organization receiving a copy directly from the Offi ce of Inspector General. No secondary distribution may be made, in whole or in part, outside the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors, by them or by other agencies or organizations, without prior authorization by the Inspector General. Public availability of the document will be determined by the Inspector General under the U.S. Code, 5 U.S.C. 552. Improper disclosure of this report may result in criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED PURPOSE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OF THE INSPECTION This inspection was conducted in accordance with the Quality Standards for Inspections, as issued by the President’s Council on Integrity and Effi ciency, and the Inspector’s Handbook, as issued by the Offi ce of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Department of State (Department) and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG). PURPOSE The Offi ce of Inspections provides the Secretary of State, the Chairman of the BBG, and Congress with systematic and independent evaluations of the operations of the Department and the BBG. Inspections cover three broad areas, consistent with Section 209 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980: • Policy Implementation: whether policy goals and objectives are being ef­ fectively achieved; whether U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montenegro Identity and Statehood Question and the Formation of the Krivokapić Government Event Analysis
    The Montenegro Identity and Statehood Question and the Formation of the Krivokapić Government Event analysis Gustavo Oliveira Teles de Menezes Doctoral student, São Paulo State University [email protected] Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 2021, 8(1), 56-66 10.25364/02.8:2021.1.5 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Contemporary Southeastern Europe is an online, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, scholarly, and policy-oriented research on issues relevant to societies in Southeastern Europe. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] or visit our website at www.contemporarysee.org The Montenegro identity and statehood question and the formation of the Krivokapić government Gustavo Oliveira Teles de Menezes Keywords: Montenegro, identity, statehood, Serbia, elections Introduction On 4 December 2020, Montenegro’s parliament elected a government led by Prime Minister Zdravko Krivokapić, the leader of the For the Future of Montenegro (Za budućnost Crne Gore, ZBCG) coalition in the 30 August 2020 parliamentary election. This was a landmark in contemporary Montenegrin history. For the first time since Montenegro reestablished a multiparty system in 1990, the Democratic Party of Socialists (Demokratska partija socijalista, DPS) went into opposition. Despite technically winning the election with 35.06% of the votes, the DPS left power due to the ZBCG’s alliance with the Peace is our Nation (Mir je naša nacija, MNN) and Black on White (Crno na bijelo, CnB) electoral coalitions. The ZBCG-MNN-CnB collectively mustered 50.62% of the votes (32.55%, 12.53% and 5.54% for each coalition respectively),1 which translated into a narrow parliamentary majority of 41 MPs (out of a total 81 seats in Montenegro’s parliament), enabling the election of Krivokapić’s government.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Political Elite Underestimate Citizens - Parliamentary Elections in Montenegro
    ANALYSIS FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG - When the political elite underestimate citizens - Parliamentary elections in Montenegro DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS Before the parliamentary elections in Montenegro, the CCE and the FES presented the findings of the public opinion research on numerous WHEN THE social and political issues that shape the attitude towards POLITICAL ELITE the election offer. The research aim was to put into focus citizens and their UNDERESTIMATE attitudes that could have been useful to election participants in formulating election campaigns, CITIZENS but which remain instructive in the coming period, as well. Parliamentary elections in Montenegro Citizens of Montenegro are Zoran Stoiljković, Miloš Vukanović, tired of the firm leaders. Daliborka Uljarević (ed.) They want democratic, September 2020 participatory leadership that will look for responses to the challenges through dialogue and compromise within strong institutions. This is almost a revolutionary change and a message political elites in Montenegro must understand. 1 DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS WHEN THE POLITICAL ELITE UNDERESTIMATE CITIZENS Parliamentary elections in Montenegro FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG - When the political elite underestimate citizens - Parliamentary elections in Montenegro Table of contents Summary 4 INTRODUCTION 5 WHAT SHAPES MONTENEGRIN POLITICS? 6 Election messages and lessons of the citizens of Montenegro 6 Trust as a source of political power 6 Social problems and priorities 7 MONTENEGRO’S DEMAND: MORE JUSTICE AND EQUALITY 8 Fatigue from the
    [Show full text]