Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: the Key Concepts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: the Key Concepts COMMUNICATION, CULTURAL AND MEDIA STUDIES: THE KEY CONCEPTS This book provides a topical and authoritative guide to Communica- tion, Cultural and Media Studies. It brings together in an accessible form some of the most important concepts that you will need, and shows how they have been - or might be - used. This third edition of the classic text Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies forms an up-to-date, multi-disciplinary explanation and assessment of the key concepts and new terms that you will encounter in your studies, from `anti-globalisation' to `reality TV', from `celebrity' to `tech-wreck'. This new edition includes: . Over 70 new entries, . Most entries revised, rewritten and updated, . Coverage of recent developments in the field, . Coverage of new interactive media and the `new economy', . An extensive bibliography to aid further study. John Hartley is Professor and Dean of the Creative Industries Faculty at Queensland University of Technology, Australia. He is author of many books and articles on television, journalism and cultural studies. His mostrecentbooks are: Popular Reality (1996), Uses of Television (1999), The Indigenous Public Sphere, with Alan McKee (2000), American Cultural Studies: A Reader, edited with Roberta E. Pearson (2000) and A Short History of Cultural Studies (2003). ROUTLEDGE KEY GUIDES Routledge Key Guides are accessible, informative and lucid handbooks, which define and discuss the central concepts, thinkers and debates in a broad range of academic disciplines. All are written by noted experts in their respective subjects. Clear, concise exposition of complex and stimulating issues and ideas make Routledge Key Guides the ultimate reference resources for students, teachers, researchers and the interested lay person. Ancient History: Key Themes and Approaches Sport Psychology: The Key Concepts Neville Morley Ellis Cashmore Business: The Key Concepts Television Studies: The Key Concepts Mark Vernon Neil Casey, Bernadette Casey, Justin Lewis, Ben Calvert and Liam French Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts (second edi- tion) Fifty Eastern Thinkers Susan Hayward Diane´ Collinson, Kathryn Plant and Robert Wilkinson Cultural Theory: The Key Concepts Edited by AndrewEdgar and Peter Fifty Contemporary Choreographers Sedgwick Edited by Martha Bremser Cultural Theory: The Key Thinkers Fifty Contemporary Filmmakers AndrewEdgar and Peter Sedgwick Edited by Yvonne Tasker Eastern Philosophy: Key Readings Fifty Key Classical Authors Oliver Leaman Alison Sharrock and Rhiannon Ash International Relations: The Key Concepts Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers Martin Griffiths and Terry O’Callaghan John Lechte Key Writers on Art: From Antiquity to the Nine- Fifty Key Figures in Twentieth-Century British teenth Century Politics Edited by Chris Murray Keith Laybourn Key Writers on Art: The Twentieth Century Fifty Key Jewish Thinkers Edited by Chris Murray Dan Cohn-Sherbok Fifty Key Thinkers on the Environment Popular Music: The Key Concepts Edited by Joy Palmer with Peter Blaze Roy Shuker Corcoran and David A. Cooper Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts Fifty Key Thinkers on History Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Marnie Hughes-Warrington Tiffin Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Con- Martin Griffiths cepts Nigel Rapport and Joanna Overing Fifty Major Economists Steven Pressman Sport and Physical Education: The Key Concepts Timothy Chandler, Mike Cronin and Wray Fifty Major Philosophers Vamplew Diane´ Collinson Fifty Major Thinkers on Education Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics Joy Palmer R. L. Trask Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education Key Concepts in the Philosophy of Education Joy Palmer John Gingell and Christopher Winch Key Concepts in Eastern Philosophy Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: Oliver Leaman The Key Concepts (third edition) John Hartley COMMUNICATION, CULTURAL AND MEDIA STUDIES The Key Concepts Third Edition John Hartley With additional material by Martin Montgomery, Elinor Rennie and Marc Brennan First published 2002 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 RoutledgeisanimprintoftheTaylor&FrancisGroup This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. # 2002 John Hartley All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in anyformorbyanyelectronic,mechanical,orothermeans,nowknownorhereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this title has been requested ISBN 0-203-44993-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-45754-4 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0–415–26888–5 (hbk) ISBN 0–415–26889–3 (pbk) CONTENTS Preface to the third edition viii Introduction ix Acknowledgements xi List of concepts xii KEY CONCEPTS 1–237 Bibliography 238 Index 259 vii PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION This is the third edition of a book first published in the early 1980s, followed by an enlarged and revised edition in the 1990s. It has remained in print and in demand for all of the intervening time. It has also been translated into Chinese, Spanish, Korean and Bahasa Malaysian. Nowhere it is again, spruced up for a newcentury. For this edition it has been revised from top to bottom, has come under single authorship, with crucial input from Martin Montgomery, Elinor Rennie and Marc Brennan, and it has been redesigned. Some concepts survive from earlier editions, but for the most part this is an entirely newwork.The entries nowinclude many that relate to new interactive media and the ‘neweconomy’, developments that were not even on the horizon when the first edition was published. The first edition was published in 1982 with the title Key Concepts in Communication Studies. The second edition was Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies, published in 1994. This edition is called Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts, the change in form of the title reflecting this volume’s alignment with Routledge’s ‘Key Guides’, of which it was the prototype. Cultural and media studies have also been successively added, in recognition of their importance both within these covers and in the world. viii INTRODUCTION In 1969, computers were the size of rooms; computer disks the size of woks. Time spent on them was so valuable you had to hire it by the hundredth of an hour (0.6 of a minute). These impressive machines, however, had about as much computing power as the old PC that people nowpass on to the kids because it is too slow.But those behemoths – the IBM 360s – were used in 1969 to send people to the moon. In the same year, the year of the Woodstock music festival and the first episodes of Sesame Street, the first Boeing 747 jumbo jet rolled out of its Seattle hangar. It was in 1969 also that, using the resources of a military budget distended by Cold War fears and the continuing Vietnam War, the US Defense Department’s Advanced Projects Research Agency invented a ‘packet switching’ technology – better known now as the Internet. Communication was entering an unprecedented phase of intensi- fication; culture was flowering; information was valuable and the sky was the limit. The media, communications and culture were moving centre stage, becoming among the most dynamic areas of con- temporary life. Since 1969 computing, communication, media and the field of popular culture have changed and burgeoned. Computing is many times faster and nowmuch more socially pervasive. International transport is now a mass medium in its own right. The Internet grows exponentially each year. The neweconomy has made its presence felt. But things have not changed out of all recognition. The USA is still the engine of innovation and growth, and simultaneously a source of anxiety and hostility. Jumbos are still flying. And some of Woodstock’s greatest hits are still playing. People don’t go the moon any more, but they do go to Disney World, which also began life in 1969. Communication, cultural and media studies are also of this vintage; relatively young by academic standards. They grewout of the period in the 1960s and 1970s when higher education began to take modern communication, culture and media seriously. This was also the time ix INTRODUCTION when universities in Europe, Australia and elsewhere began to open their doors to people whose families had never before sent a daughter or son to university. The combination – newideas, newobjects of study, newstudents – has made this field very dynamic, very interesting to work in and also controversial. As relatively newareas of study, communication, cultural and media studies have been characterised by fast-moving and innovative research work;by the attempt to say newthings in newways. At the same time, they have borrowed widely from a variety of established academic disciplines and discourses. As a result, there is often an uneasy period for the newcomer to the area, until you get your bearings. What follows is a field guide. It is designed to put together in an accessible form some of the most important concepts that you will encounter, and to showsome of the ways in whichthese concepts have been (or might be) used. The book is not a dictionary – it does not claim to treat concepts ‘definitively’. The entries are not destinations but starting points for further intellectual and practical work. Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts is designed to help students and teachers newto the area find their way about. It may be that getting to knowa newarea of study is best done by the usual method: crashing about in the dark and bumping into things. This was certainly the case was for me when I started trying to understand communication, culture and media back in 1969, the year I went to university (the first member of my family to do so).
Recommended publications
  • Television and the Myth of the Mediated Centre: Time for a Paradigm Shift in Television Studies?
    TELEVISION AND THE MYTH OF THE MEDIATED CENTRE: TIME FOR A PARADIGM SHIFT IN TELEVISION STUDIES? Paper presented to Media in Transition 3 conference, MIT, Boston, USA 2-4 May 2003 NICK COULDRY LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Media@lse London school of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE UK Tel +44 (0)207 955 6243 Fax +44 (0)207 955 7505 [email protected] 1 TELEVISION AND THE MYTH OF THE MEDIATED CENTRE: TIME FOR A PARADIGM SHIFT IN TELEVISION STUDIES? ‘The celebrities of media culture are the icons of the present age, the deities of an entertainment society, in which money, looks, fame and success are the ideals and goals of the dreaming billions who inhabit Planet Earth’ Douglas Kellner, Media Spectacle (2003: viii) ‘The many watch the few. The few who are watched are the celebrities . Wherever they are from . all displayed celebrities put on display the world of celebrities . precisely the quality of being watched – by many, and in all corners of the globe. Whatever they speak about when on air, they convey the message of a total way of life. Their life, their way of life . In the Synopticon, locals watch the globals [whose] authority . is secured by their very remoteness’ Zygmunt Bauman, Globalization: The Human Consequences (1998: 53-54) Introduction There seems to something like a consensus emerging in television analysis. Increasing attention is being given to what were once marginal themes: celebrity, reality television (including reality game-shows), television spectacles. Two recent books by leading media and cultural commentators have focussed, one explicitly and the other implicitly, on the consequences of the ‘supersaturation’ of social life with media images and media models (Gitlin, 2001; cf Kellner, 2003), of which celebrity, reality TV and spectacle form a taken-for-granted part.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Influence Matrix Slovakia
    J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 0 MEDIA INFLUENCE MATRIX: SLOVAKIA Government, Politics and Regulation Author: Marius Dragomir 2nd updated edition Published by CEU Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), Budapest, 2020 About CMDS About the author The Center for Media, Data and Society Marius Dragomir is the Director of the Center (CMDS) is a research center for the study of for Media, Data and Society. He previously media, communication, and information worked for the Open Society Foundations (OSF) policy and its impact on society and for over a decade. Since 2007, he has managed practice. Founded in 2004 as the Center for the research and policy portfolio of the Program Media and Communication Studies, CMDS on Independent Journalism (PIJ), formerly the is part of Central European University’s Network Media Program (NMP), in London. He School of Public Policy and serves as a focal has also been one of the main editors for PIJ's point for an international network of flagship research and advocacy project, Mapping acclaimed scholars, research institutions Digital Media, which covered 56 countries and activists. worldwide, and he was the main writer and editor of OSF’s Television Across Europe, a comparative study of broadcast policies in 20 European countries. CMDS ADVISORY BOARD Clara-Luz Álvarez Floriana Fossato Ellen Hume Monroe Price Anya Schiffrin Stefaan G. Verhulst Hungary, 1051 Budapest, Nador u. 9. Tel: +36 1 327 3000 / 2609 Fax: +36 1 235 6168 E-mail: [email protected] ABOUT THE MEDIA INFLUENCE MATRIX The Media Influence Matrix Project is run collaboratively by the Media & Power Research Consortium, which consists of local as well as regional and international organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructional Communication 8 the Emergence of a Field
    Instructional Communication 8 The Emergence of a Field Scott A. Myers ince its inception, the field of instructional communication has Senjoyed a healthy existence. Unlike its related subareas of communi- cation education and developmental communication (Friedrich, 1989), instructional communication is considered to be a unique area of study rooted in the tripartite field of research conducted among educational psychology, pedagogy, and communication studies scholars (Mottet & Beebe, 2006). This tripartite field focuses on the learner (i.e., how students learn affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively), the instructor (i.e., the skills and strategies necessary for effective instruction), and the meaning exchanged in the verbal, nonverbal, and mediated messages between and among instructors and students. As such, the study of instructional com- munication centers on the study of the communicative factors in the teaching-learning process that occur across grade levels (e.g., K–12, post- secondary), instructional settings (e.g., the classroom, the organization), and subject matter (Friedrich, 1989; Staton, 1989). Although some debate exists as to the events that precipitated the emer- gence of instructional communication as a field of study (Rubin & Feezel, 1986; Sprague, 1992), McCroskey and McCroskey (2006) posited that the establishment of instructional communication as a legitimate area of scholarship originated in 1972, when the governing board of the Inter- national Communication Association created the Instructional Communi- cation Division. The purpose of the Division was to “focus attention on the role of communication in all teaching and training contexts, not just the teaching of communication” (p. 35), and provided instructional communication researchers with the opportunity to showcase their scholarship at the Association’s annual convention and to publish their research in Communication Yearbook, a yearly periodical sponsored by the Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21St Century
    An occasional paper on digital media and learning Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Henry Jenkins, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with Katie Clinton Ravi Purushotma Alice J. Robison Margaret Weigel Building the new field of digital media and learning The MacArthur Foundation launched its five-year, $50 million digital media and learning initiative in 2006 to help determine how digital technologies are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize, and participate in civic life.Answers are critical to developing educational and other social institutions that can meet the needs of this and future generations. The initiative is both marshaling what it is already known about the field and seeding innovation for continued growth. For more information, visit www.digitallearning.macfound.org.To engage in conversations about these projects and the field of digital learning, visit the Spotlight blog at spotlight.macfound.org. About the MacArthur Foundation The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is a private, independent grantmaking institution dedicated to helping groups and individuals foster lasting improvement in the human condition.With assets of $5.5 billion, the Foundation makes grants totaling approximately $200 million annually. For more information or to sign up for MacArthur’s monthly electronic newsletter, visit www.macfound.org. The MacArthur Foundation 140 South Dearborn Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel.(312) 726-8000 www.digitallearning.macfound.org An occasional paper on digital media and learning Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Henry Jenkins, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with Katie Clinton Ravi Purushotma Alice J.
    [Show full text]
  • Marital and Familial Roles on Television: an Exploratory Sociological Analysis Charles Daniel Fisher Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1974 Marital and familial roles on television: an exploratory sociological analysis Charles Daniel Fisher Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Charles Daniel, "Marital and familial roles on television: an exploratory sociological analysis " (1974). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5984. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5984 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA CONSUMPTION HABITS DURING the LOCKDOWN Impact Assessment of Media Usage During Quarantine - April 2020
    MEDIA CONSUMPTION HABITS DURING THE LOCKDOWN Impact Assessment of Media Usage During Quarantine - April 2020 ©2020 IpsosKE_AUM_ Media Consumption Habits I April 2020 SNAPSHOT SUMMARY This report snapshot highlights the situational analysis on media access and consumption habits at a time when a significant proportion of the continent population is either in lockdown and for some, working from home due to the Covid-19 crisis. From our analysis, here are some interesting observations: Increased media time; high consumption of TV programing Increased levels of anxiety and Online activities Increased household Increased spend on food and expenditure; school going healthcare hence less saving. children are at home CRISIS • Media is awash with stories of job loses meaning budgetary Increased idle time for constraints at the family level family bonding • Reduced consumer purchase power With heavy media consumption by a hungry audience, therein SO WHAT? lies the opportunity for creative content development. ©2020 IpsosKE_AUM_ Media Consumption Habits I April 2020 METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLING Survey Demographic Profile Rift Valley 1 25% National survey achieved a total sample of Eastern 2 15% 2,049 respondents 1 Central 3 13% 2 8 Nyanza 4 13% The representative sample covered the 18+ 37% 6 URBAN 63% Nairobi 5 11% population across all regions of Kenya 4 3 RURAL Western 6 10% 5 Coast 7 9% The survey was conducted telephonically 7 N. Eastern 8 4% (CATI) from 9th to 19th April 2020 49% 51% MALE FEMALE AGE SOCIAL ECONOMIC CLASS Refused 2% 45yrs + 23% LSM
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America
    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield Sociology & Anthropology Faculty Publications Sociology & Anthropology Department 3-1991 The ideological origins of the Population Association of America Dennis Hodgson Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/sociologyandanthropology- facultypubs Archived with permission from the copyright holder. Copyright 1991 Wiley and Population Council. Link to the journal homepage: (http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/padr) Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Hodgson, Dennis, "The ideological origins of the Population Association of America" (1991). Sociology & Anthropology Faculty Publications. 32. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/sociologyandanthropology-facultypubs/32 Published Citation Hodgson, Dennis. "The ideological origins of the Population Association of America." Population and Development Review 17, no. 1 (March 1991): 1-34. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America DENNIS HODGSON THE FIELD OF POPULATION in the United States early in this century was quite diffuse. There were no academic programs producing certified demographers, no body of theory and methods that all agreed constituted the field, no consensus on which population problems posed the most serious threat to the nation or human welfare more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Encoding/Decoding, the Transmission Model and a Court of Law
    Final Revision: Title: Encoding/Decoding, the Transmission Model and a Court of Law Keyan G. Tomaselli Abstract: Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding model is discussed in terms of CS Peirce’s theory of the interpreter and interpretant. This historical semiotic window frames an example to which the Hall model was applied in South Africa to oppose a military dirty tricks campaign that involved a Supreme Court case brought against the Minister of Defence by the End Conscription Campaign (ECC) requiring him to cease his disinformation against the ECC. The Minister’s own expert had proposed a transmission model of communication that was defeated by the Peirce-Hall combination. The author argues that the model can be massively strengthened when combined with Peirceian semiotics. Keywords: Stuart Hall, encoding/decoding, CS Peirce, Phaneroscopy, semiotics, reception Media-society relations are best studied within the broader conceptual environment facilitated by the circuit of culture model (Du Gay et al., 1997) that mimics Karl Marx’s circle of capitalist production, distribution and exchange. The model implicitly incorporated Stuart Hall’s (1981) ground-breaking encoding-decoding relationship. My argument will be that Charles Sanders Peirce’s (Hartshorne and Weiss, 1931-5) idea of the ‘interpretant’ – the idea to which the sign gives rise - was a crucial, if unspoken, progenitor of Hall’s model. Working at the same time as Hall, Umberto Eco (1972) had proposed “aberrant decoding” on which Hall must have drawn, as his chapter refers to a semiological article on encoding. The early Stencilled Occasional Paper and Hutchinson book series’ that mapped out the early Birmingham University Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) project under Stuart Hall’s leadership identified the following semiological/semiotic sources also: Roland Barthes, Jonathan Culler and V.I.
    [Show full text]
  • B.A. Communication Studies (Public Relations Track) 20-21 Bulletin
    B.A. Communication Studies (Public Relations Track) 20-21 Bulletin https://bulletin.oglethorpe.edu/9-major-minor-programs-requirements/ CORE Requirements Freshman Year Sophomore Year Junior Year Senior Year Required Culture Required Math COR 101 ( 4hrs) COR 201 ( 4hrs) COR 301 (4hrs) COR 400 (4hrs) Choose One: COR 314 (4hrs) COR 102 ( 4hrs) COR 202 ( 4hrs) COR 302 (4hrs) COR 103/COR 104/COR 105 (4hrs) Major Overview Major Course Requirements The program in Communication and Rhetoric Studies prepares students to become critically reflective citizens and practitioners Completion of all the following courses: in professions, including journalism, public relations, law, poli- COM 101 Theories of Communication and Rhetoric tics, broadcasting, advertising, public service, corporate commu- nications and publishing. Students learn to perform effectively COM 105 Introduction to Communication Research as ethical communicators – as speakers, writers, readers and Methods researchers who know how to examine and engage audiences, COM 110 Public Speaking from local to global situations. Majors acquire theories, research COM 120 Introduction to Media Studies methods and practices for producing as well as judging commu- COM 270 Principles of Public Relations nication of all kinds – written, spoken, visual and multi-media. The program encourages students to understand messages, au- COM 310 Public Relations Writing diences and media as shaped by social, historical, political, eco- COM 410 Public Relations Theory and Research nomic and cultural conditions. Completion of one of the following: Students have the opportunity to receive hands-on experience COM 240 Introduction to Newswriting in a communication field of their choice through an internship. A COM 260 Writing for Business and the Professions leading center for the communications industry, Atlanta pro- vides excellent opportunities for students to explore career op- COM 320 Persuasive Writing tions and apply their skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a More Effective Pedagogy by Jonathan Godwin a Thesis
    Film in the Classroom: Toward a More Effective Pedagogy by Jonathan Godwin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: S. Elizabeth Bird, Ph.D. Brent Weisman, Ph.D. Jonathan Gayles, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 21, 2003 Keywords: film, audience, semiotics, representation, media, © Copyright 2003, Jonathan Godwin Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my parents for their incredible and constant support, both financially and spiritually, especially throughout my entire academic career. I simply cannot imagine where I would be right now with out the unbelievable help they always have given so selflessly. Secondly, I want to thank Dr. Tim Wallace at North Carolina State University for being the right person at the right time in my life. Tim introduced me to anthropology, now a lifelong pursuit, at I time when I had little direction in life. I owe my career to his enthusiasm for what he teaches as well as his tireless efforts to bring students to actually experience anthropology in the field. I thank him for giving me all the opportunities with the field school in Costa Rica, presenting papers at conferences, and generally for an unimaginable patience with me over the years and most of all for being a good- hearted, enjoyable friend throughout it all. I would never be writing these words if not for him. Thanks Tim. And thanks to Jon Carter for being endlessly available to discuss and develop ideas, another person to whom I owe so much.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication, Culture and Community: Towards a Cultural Analysis of Community Media
    The Qualitative Report Volume 7 Number 3 Article 6 9-1-2002 Communication, Culture and Community: Towards A Cultural Analysis of Community Media Kevin Howley DePauw University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr Part of the Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, and the Social Statistics Commons Recommended APA Citation Howley, K. (2002). Communication, Culture and Community: Towards A Cultural Analysis of Community Media. The Qualitative Report, 7(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2002.1975 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Qualitative Report at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Qualitative Report by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Communication, Culture and Community: Towards A Cultural Analysis of Community Media Abstract This paper promotes a research agenda committed to a sustained, multiperspectival cultural analysis of community-based media. In doing so, the essay takes up two interrelated arguments. First, it is suggested that community media represent a conspicuous blind spot in cultural approaches to communication studies: a situation that is at odds with the hallmarks of cultural studies scholarship, especially its affirmation of popular forms ofesistance r and its celebration of and keen appreciation for local cultural production. Second, the author maintains that as a site of intense struggle over cultural production, distribution, and consumption within and through communication and information technologies, community media demand the rigorous, interdisciplinary approaches and interventionist strategies associated with the finest traditions of cultural studies scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Producer-Consumer Convergence: Media Policy Priorities in the Era of User- Generated and User-Distributed Content Philip M
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Donald McGannon Communication Research McGannon Center Research Resources Center 10-2009 Navigating Producer-Consumer Convergence: Media Policy Priorities in the Era of User- Generated and User-Distributed Content Philip M. Napoli Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/mcgannon_research Part of the Public Relations and Advertising Commons Recommended Citation Napoli, Philip M., "Navigating Producer-Consumer Convergence: Media Policy Priorities in the Era of User-Generated and User- Distributed Content" (2009). McGannon Center Research Resources. 6. https://fordham.bepress.com/mcgannon_research/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Donald McGannon Communication Research Center at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGannon Center Research Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 THE D ONALD M C G ANNON C OMMUNICATION R ESEARCH C ENTER W ORKING P APER N AVIGATING P RODUCER-CONSUMER C ONVERGENCE: M EDIA P OLICY P RIORITIES IN THE E RA OF U SER-GENERATED AND U SER-DISTRIBUTED C ONTENT Philip M. Napoli Director Donald McGannon Communication Research Center Professor Graduate School of Business Fordham University October, 2009 The Donald McGannon Communication Research Center Faculty Memorial Hall, 4th fl. Fordham University Bronx, NY 10458 718.817.4195 www.fordham.edu/mcgannon [email protected] 2 Introduction Perhaps the greatest challenge confronting media policymakers and policy researchers is effectively adjusting their analytical frameworks to account for the dramatic changes taking place in the contemporary media environment.
    [Show full text]