2019 Annual Report Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 Annual Report Annual Report 2017 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 74377.indd 1 3/9/20 10:52 AM Table of Contents Cover: Todochi Wells, Chairman Letter 1 terminal manager at MPLX’s Champaign, Illinois facility Financial Highlights 6 Safety and Environmental Stewardship 8 Board of Directors 10 Company Offi cers 11 Key Financial and Operational Results 12 Reconciliation Data 13 MPLX operations as of Dec. 31, 2019 MPLX Owned and Part-Owned Glossary of Terms Light Product Terminals MPLX Owned Asphalt/Heavy Oil bbl: barrels Terminals bcf/d: billion cubic feet per day MPC Refi neries bpd: barrels per day Caverns cf/d: cubic feet per day EBITDA: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation MPC/MPLX Pipelines (a) and amortization MPLX Refi ning Logistics Assets GP: general partner MPLX Gathering System IPO: initial public offering of units MPLX Owned Marine Facility LP: limited partner MarkWest: MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P., a wholly Natural Gas Processing Complex (b) owned subsidiary of MPLX LP acquired in December 2015 mbpd: thousand barrels per day Note: Illustrative representation of asset map. MLP: master limited partnership (a) Includes MPC/MPLX owned and operated lines, mmcf/d: million cubic feet per day MPC/MPLX interest lines operated by others and MPC: Marathon Petroleum Corporation MPC/MPLX operated lines owned by others. (b) Includes MPLX owned and operated natural MPL: Marathon Pipe Line LLC gas processing complexes NGL: Natural gas liquids 74377.indd 2 3/9/20 10:52 AM MPLX I 2019 ANNUAL REPORT I 1 FROM THE CHAIRMAN Fellow unitholders, It’s a pleasure for me to report that MPLX fi nished 2019 with strong operational and fi nancial results. Our adjusted EBITDA for the year was $5.1 billion, including results of Andeavor Logistics, which we acquired in July. We generated $4.1 billion of cash from operations and returned approximately 75%, or nearly $3 billion, to unitholders. Our 2019 pipeline and terminal through- puts were up over the prior year, and gathering and processing volumes increased signifi cantly, by 10% and 12%, respectively. Our strategic priorities We maintained our strategic focus on capturing the full midstream value chain as we connect supply – especially from prime production regions – to global demand markets. We worked to enhance cash fl ow stability through our investment in long-haul pipelines and export capabilities, and continued to pursue value- creating opportunities with our sponsor, Marathon Petroleum $4,100 Corporation (MPC), which enabled us to enhance projects through volume commitments while $3,035 providing logistics solutions to MPC’s nationwide refi ning system. We maintained our commitment 2018 2019 to fi nancial discipline by issuing no new equity for growth projects Distributable cash flow attributable to MPLX (in millions). and targeted mid-teen returns Includes results of predecessor. See reconciliations on Pages 13-15. on our growth investments. 74377.indd 3 3/9/20 10:52 AM MPLX I 2019 ANNUAL REPORT I 2 FROM THE CHAIRMAN Achieving our strategic vision in 2019 During 2019, we made excellent progress creating an integrated crude oil and natural gas logistics system from the Permian to the U.S. Gulf Coast. To serve crude oil producers and markets, in 2019 we established an equity ownership interest in the Wink to Webster pipeline joint venture, which subsequently joined with another crude oil transportation project. We own an approximate 11% interest in the project. Wink to Webster is fully committed with minimum volume commitments, and is expected to transport up to 1.5 million bpd of crude oil from the Permian Basin to the Houston Below left: MPLX area, including MPC’s Galveston Bay refi nery, byearly 2021. Gathering and Processing’s Hidalgo complex in Culberson County, Texas The Whistler natural gas pipeline is approximately 95% committed with minimum volume commitments, Below right: and is expected to transport approximately 2 bcf/d of gas from Waha, Texas, to the Agua Dulce market Maintenance Mechanic Chad Hixon at MPLX’s in South Texas by the second half of 2021. Ultimately, we anticipate this project will help provide natural Royal Oak Compressor gas to MPC’s Galveston Bay refi nery. We also continued to study our proposed Belvieu Alternative Station in Butler County, Pennsylvania Natural Gas Liquids (BANGL) pipeline. creating an integrated system 74377.indd 4 3/9/20 10:52 AM MPLX I 2019 ANNUAL REPORT I 3 In the fourth quarter we made important progress on the reversal of Capline Pipeline, purging the mainline to prepare for the next phases of work. We anticipate the reversed Capline will begin transporting discounted mid-continent and Canadian crude oil from Patoka, Illinois, to St. James, Louisiana, with light crude service beginning mid-2021. MPC has a 33% ownership interest in Capline, while MPLX operates the line. Integration with MPC operations is a key benefi t of the Capline reversal, since MPC’s Garyville, Louisiana, refi nery is directly connected to storage in St. James. In our Marcellus and Utica natural gas gathering and processing operations, our just-in-time Below left: Maintenance growth strategy continues to serve us and our producer-customers well. We added two Mechanic John Koci at MPLX’s Royal Oak processing plants to our Sherwood complex in West Virginia in 2019, bringing its capacity to Compressor Station in Butler County, 2.6 bcf/d, the largest plant of its kind in the world. This expansion contributed to a 14% increase Pennsylvania in processed volumes in our Marcellus and Utica operations. Below right: Lab Tech- nician Laura Trevino at In the Southwest, we added a 200 million cf/d plant, Tornado, in the fourth quarter and continued MPLX’s Javelina construction of our Preakness plant with service expected to begin in the second quarter of 2020. processing complex in Corpus Christi, Texas These facilities will complement our Argo and Hidalgo plants currently in place in the Delaware Basin. 74377.indd 5 3/9/20 10:53 AM MPLX I 2019 ANNUAL REPORT I 4 FROM THE CHAIRMAN Altogether, these facilities are expected to contribute volumes for the planned Whistler pipeline. We expect to begin operating our Preakness processing plant in the Permian during the second quarter of 2020, and the Smithburg 1 processing plant in the Marcellus in the third quarter. In July 2019, MPLX acquired Andeavor Logistics, creating a leading, large-scale, diversifi ed midstream company anchored by fee-based cash fl ows. Looking toward the future As we look forward, we are targeting positive free cash fl ow, after capital investments and distributions, Below left: Board in 2021. We expect this to allow funding of our distribution and growth capital programs entirely from Operator Curtis McDonald internally generated cash fl ow. Our objective in shifting to a model focused on generating cash fl ow at MPLX’s Sherwood gas processing and beyond the needs of the business is to enable MPLX to focus its capital allocation toward debt fractionation complex in reduction or unit repurchases. Doddridge County, West Virginia We also continued to high-grade our capital plan. In 2018, we spent approximately 85% of our growth Below right: capital on the Gathering and Processing (G&P) segment, and in 2019, we allocated our approximately MPLX’s Bluestone gas $2.2 billion of capital spending equally between our G&P and Logistics and Storage (L&S) segments. processing complex in As we shift our growth capital investments in the business to the L&S segment, our target in 2020 is to spend Butler County, Pennsylvania up to 75% of our $1.5 billion investment plan on L&S, focusing on areas of growth, such as the Permian. 74377.indd 6 3/9/20 10:53 AM MPLX I 2019 ANNUAL REPORT I 5 This year, we have shared more information on MPLX’s safety and environmental stewardship performance on Pages 8 and 9 of this report. MPLX’s performance is also captured as part of two publications released by MPC. I encourage you to read MPC’s current Sustainability Report and Perspectives on Climate-Related Scenarios, both of which are available on its website, www.MarathonPetroleum.com, to learn more about MPLX’s performance and contribution in these important areas. Fellow unitholders, we are excited about the future of MPLX. Our position in the nation’s best production regions, our projects to connect these regions to demand centers, and our fi nancial discipline provide a strong foundation for continued growth and future positive free cash fl ow. We appreciate your investment in our partnership, and look forward to continuing to share our success with you. Sincerely, Below: Operations Technician Scott Wright at MPLX’s Gary R. Heminger light-products terminal in Chairman Jacksonville, Florida targeting positive free cash fl ow generation by 2021 74377.indd 7 3/9/20 10:53 AM MPLX I 2019 ANNUAL REPORT I 6 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS In millions, except per unit and ratio data 2017 2018 2019 Net income attributable to MPLX $794 $1,818 $1,033 (e) Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MPLX (including predecessor results)(a) 2,004 3,810 5,104 Net cash provided by operating activities 1,907 3,071 4,082 Distributable cash fl ow (DCF)(b) 1,628 3,035 4,100 Distribution per common unit(c) 2.30 2.53 2.69 Distribution coverage ratio(d) 1.28x 1.49x 1.51x (a) Non-GAAP measure. See reconciliations on Pages 13-15. Includes predecessor adjusted EBITDA adjustments attributable to Andeavor Logistics. (b) Non-GAAP measure calculated before distributions to preferred unitholders. See reconciliations on Pages 13-15. Includes predecessor adjusted EBITDA and DCF adjustments attributable to Andeavor Logistics. (c) Distributions declared by the board of directors of MPLX’s general partner.
Recommended publications
  • The Gulf War's Afterlife
    The Scholar THE GULF WAR’S AFTERLIFE: DILEMMAS, MISSED OPPORTUNITIES, AND THE POST-COLD WAR ORDER UNDONE SAMUEL HELFONT 25 The Gulf War’s Afterlife: Dilemmas, Missed Opportunities, and the Post-Cold War Order Undone The Gulf War is often remembered as a “good war,” a high- tech conflict that quickly and cleanly achieved its objectives. Yet, new archival evidence sheds light on the extended fallout from the war and challenges this neat narrative. The Gulf War left policymakers with a dilemma that plagued successive U.S. administrations. The war helped create an acute humanitarian crisis in Iraq, and the United States struggled to find a way to contain a still recalcitrant Saddam Hussein while alleviating the suffering of innocent Iraqis. The failure of American leaders to resolve this dilemma, despite several chances to do so, allowed Saddam’s regime to drive a wedge into the heart of the American-led, post-Cold War order. While in the short term the war seemed like a triumph, over the years its afterlife caused irreparable harm to American interests. n June 1991, nearly 5 million onlookers en- American politics. Both the Clinton and Obama ad- thusiastically welcomed American troops ministrations admired the way President George returning home from the Gulf War as they H. W. Bush handled the conflict.5 Despite some marched in a ticker-tape parade through handwringing about Saddam Hussein remaining in NewI York City’s “Canyon of Heroes.”1 This image power and the fact that there was no World War of the Gulf War as a triumph has proved endur- II-style surrender, the conflict is still remembered ing.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT SHERWOOD, WEST VIRGINIA MPLX I 2020 ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO Fellow Unitholders, an MPLX joint venture that is connected to nearly 20 gas processing plants in the Delaware Basin of far West Texas and More than any other year, 2020 highlighted the strength, stability southeastern New Mexico. The system entered commercial and resiliency of our underlying businesses, with the company service earlier in 2021. Through another project, we increased achieving several significant milestones despite the unprecedented challenges and disruptions created by the global COVID-19 fractionation capacity at our Hopedale facility in Ohio. The pandemic. We generated positive excess cash flow for the full 80,000 barrel-per-day expansion has allowed the facility to year after self-funding our total capital investments and our reach record fractionation volumes of 320,000 barrels per day. distributions to unitholders, and we achieved this sooner than We also continued to advance the Smithburg 1 Processing our original target of 2021. This accomplishment provided us the Plant project, which will add 200 million cubic feet per day of financial flexibility to begin implementing a board-authorized natural gas processing capacity for the Marcellus Basin when repurchase program of up to $1 billion in outstanding publicly traded it comes online in 2021. common units, and we completed the repurchase of approximately During 2021, we intend to continue exercising strict capital $33 million in units during the fourth quarter of 2020. discipline with a growth capital outlook of $800 million, focusing In addition, we were able to increase our adjusted EBITDA (a) for on projects expected to deliver the highest returns and support the year by $100 million to $5.2 billion and grow total distributable the generation of excess cash flow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum Industry: Mergers, Structural Change, and Antitrust
    Federal Trade Commission TIMOTHY J. MURIS Chairman MOZELLE W. THOMPSON Commissioner ORSON SWINDLE Commissioner THOMAS B. LEARY Commissioner PAMELA JONES HARBOUR Commissioner Bureau of Economics Luke M. Froeb Director Mark W. Frankena Deputy Director for Antitrust Paul A. Pautler Deputy Director for Consumer Protection Timothy A. Deyak Associate Director for Competition Analysis Pauline M. Ippolito Associate Director for Special Projects Robert D. Brogan Assistant Director for Antitrust Louis Silvia Assistant Director for Antitrust Michael G. Vita Assistant Director for Antitrust Denis A. Breen Assistant Director for Economic Policy Analysis Gerard R. Butters Assistant Director for Consumer Protection This is a report of the Bureau of Economics of the Federal Trade Commission. The views expressed in this report are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission or any individual Commissioner. The Commission has voted to authorize staff to publish this report. Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Bureau of Economics under the supervision of David T. Scheffman, former Director; Mary T. Coleman, former Deputy Director and Mark Frankena, Deputy Director; and Louis Silvia, Assistant Director. Bureau economists who researched and drafted this report were Jay Creswell, Jeffrey Fischer, Daniel Gaynor, Geary Gessler, Christopher Taylor, and Charlotte Wojcik. Bureau Research Analysts who worked on this project were Madeleine McChesney, Joseph Remy, Michael Madigan, Paul Golaszewski, Matthew Tschetter, Ryan Toone, Karl Kindler, Steve Touhy, and Louise Sayers. Bureau of Economics staff also acknowledge the review of drafts and many helpful comments and suggestions from members of the staff of the Bureau of Competition, in particular Phillip L.
    [Show full text]
  • FCPA Digest Jan 2011
    FCPA Digest Cases and Review Releases Relating to Bribes to Foreign Officials under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 JANUARY 2011 FCPA Digest of Cases and Review Releases Relating to Bribes to Foreign Officials under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (January 20, 2011) Shearman & Sterling LLP Copyright © 2011 Shearman & Sterling LLP. As used herein “Shearman & Sterling” refers to Shearman & Sterling LLP, a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Editorial Board Editor In Chief: Philip Urofsky Washington, DC London +1.202.508.8060 [email protected] Managing Editors: Amanda Kosonen and Ashley Walker Contributing Editor: Jill Aberbach Digest Contributors: Jill Aberbach, Jeanetta Craigwell-Graham, Teddy Flo, Helene Gogadze, Josh Goodman, Chris Greer, Amanda Kosonen, Grace Lee, Mario Meeks, Marina Moon, Jennifer Rimm, and Ashley Walker. Founding Editor: Danforth Newcomb New York +1.212.848.4184 [email protected] Past Contributors: Andrew Agor, Carolyn Bannon, Rachel Barnes, Parth Chanda, Bryan Dayton, Saamir Elshihabi, Andrew Giddings, Melissa Godwin, William Hauptman, Pasha Hsieh, Mary Isernhagen, Joshua Johnston, Meaghan Kelly, Michael Kieval, Michael Krauss, Debra Laboschin, Marlon Layton, Christopher Le Mon, Tal Machnes, Natalie Marjancik, Bronwen Mason, Nicola Painter, Judith Reed, Matthew Reynolds, Brian Scibetta, Jeena Shah, Rachel Schipper, Natalie Waites, Elizabeth Weiss, and Gregory Wyckoff. Board of Advisors: Stephen Fishbein Paula Howell Anderson Patrick D. Robbins Richard Kelly New York New York San Francisco London +1.212.848.4424 +1.212.848.7727 +1.415.616.1210 +44.20.7655.5788 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jo Rickard Richard Kreindler Markus S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Oil in Venezuela: a Decision-Making Analysis of PDVSA’S Internationalisation Policy
    1 The politics of oil in Venezuela: a decision-making analysis of PDVSA’s internationalisation policy A PhD thesis by C&sar E. Baena London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government 1 9 9 7 UMI Number: U615175 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615175 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 7m £ .s £ S f 7^S7 5%uUl^> 2 ABSTRACT The high degree of international vertical integration achieved by the Venezuelan state oil enterprise, Petr6leos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), has placed it among the most important oil multinationals (MNs). The policy of creating downstream outlets through the establishment of foreign direct investments (FDIs) in the form of refinery assets was given the term of ‘internationalisation’. Besides enabling PDVSA to expand market share and gain access to specific know-how, the internationalisation policy provided industry policy-makers with a way of maximising corporate decision-making freedom, farther away from the government's financial demands and Congress meddling. Venezuela offers a unique case and thus a fertile ground for the study of oil policymaking processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 4:09-Cv-03884 Document 150 Filed in TXSD on 03/31/11 Page 1 of 64
    Case 4:09-cv-03884 Document 150 Filed in TXSD on 03/31/11 Page 1 of 64 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ODELIA ABECASSIS, et al.,§ § Plaintiffs, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-3884 § OSCAR S. WYATT, JR., et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM AND OPINION This suit arises out of terrorist attacks in Israel between 2000 and 2003. The plaintiffs are Americans injured in the attacks and their relatives. The defendants are companies and individuals involved in the oil and gas business. The plaintiffs allege that these defendants purchased oil from Iraq and made payments that violated the United Nations Oil for Food Program. The Program required anyone buying oil from Iraq to place the purchase money into an escrow account monitored by the United Nations. Funds from this account could only be used for humanitarian purposes. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants were involved in buying Iraqi oil with payments that included illegal kickbacks to a secret bank account in Jordan controlled by Saddam Hussein. The plaintiffs allege that Hussein used funds from this account to provide money and services to Palestinian terrorist organizations and to make payments to the families of suicide bombers and others killed in carrying out the terrorist attacks. According to the plaintiffs, such payments were important in recruiting terrorists. Case 4:09-cv-03884 Document 150 Filed in TXSD on 03/31/11 Page 2 of 64 The original complaint included 193 plaintiffs, all of whom alleged violations of the Torture Victims Protection Act (“TVPA”).1 Most of these plaintiffs were aliens who also asserted claims arising under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”),2 which permits aliens to sue for some violations of customary international law.
    [Show full text]
  • See Full Genealogy of Major U.S. Refiners
    Genealogy of major U.S. refiners 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Amoco BPb SOHIO 12/98 BP 1/89 BP 4/00 12/88a 4/08c BP-Husky Refining LLC (jv) ARCO Husky Mapco Williams 3/98 Williams 3/03d 5/04h 7/94e 12/98f 7/07i Clark Refining Premcorg 10/11j Orion Valero 9/05 Diamond Shamrock Ultramar Diamond Shamrock (UDS) 12/96 Valero p q 9/00l 7/03 6/10 12/10 Ultramark 9/97 UDS Total North America n 6/00 Valero m 12/01 Valero 10/98 Valero PBF Energy Salomon (Basis) 5/97 Valero 6/01 Huntway 3/11x 6/01o Coastal r 12/88 Pacific Refining (jv) 1/01s El Paso 9/89t 8/94u 1/04w Sun Company Sunocov Carlyle Groupy See notes, footnotes, and source notes below. Genealogy of major U.S. refiners (continued) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Ashland 2/13bb z Marathon Ashland Petroleum (MAP) (jv) Rock Island 1/98 6/05z 11/89 USX (Marathon) Marathon Oil Marathon Petroleumaa USX (Marathon) Lyondell LyondellBasellee dd dd 7/93 Lyondell-CITGO (jv) 8/06 CITGOcc CITGO Hovensa (jv)gg 10/98ff Amerada Hess Star Enterprise (jv) 11/88hh 7/98ii Motiva Enterprises (jv) Texaco Equilon Enterprises (jv) jj 1/98 ll Shell Oil 3/02 Shell Oil 4/93kk Deer Park Refining (jv) mm nn oo pp qq Tesoro 8/98 9/01 5/02 5/07 6/13 Tesoro 5/98 BHP Petroleum 11/99rr Frontier Frontier 11/99 Wainco 6/03ss 6/09tt 12/09uu 7/11 Holly Frontier Holly See notes, footnotes, and source notes below.
    [Show full text]
  • Feb. 9-15, 2021 Further Reproduction Or Distribution Is Subject to Original Copyright Restrictions
    Weekly Media Report – Feb. 9-15, 2021 Further reproduction or distribution is subject to original copyright restrictions. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… RESEARCH: 1. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter: Teaching an Old Spacecraft New Tricks to Continue Exploring the Moon (SciTech Daily 14 Feb 21) … Bill Steigerwald NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft has far exceeded its planned mission duration, revealing that the Moon holds surprises: ice deposits that could be used to support future lunar exploration, the coldest places in the solar system in permanently shadowed regions at the lunar poles, and that it is an active world that is shrinking, generating moonquakes and changing in front of our eyes. LRO has mapped the surface in exquisite detail, returning millions of images of a starkly beautiful lunar landscape and paving the way for future human missions under NASA’s Artemis program… For LRO’s new speedometer to operate properly, the star trackers need to maintain an unobstructed view of the stars, which can be blocked by the Earth or Moon, or the glare of the Sun. Otherwise, it is impossible to determine the orientation or estimate the rotational speed of the spacecraft. Ensuring that the star trackers are always unobstructed during science maneuvers made many science observations that could be easily done with the MIMU impossible to perform without it. To reclaim these otherwise lost opportunities, Goddard, NASA’s Engineering Safety Center (NESC) and the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) in Monterey, California, teamed up once again in their long history of cooperative research to rapidly develop a collection of new, revolutionary methods to enable LRO to keep exploring the Moon to its fullest ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserves Overbooking: the Problem We Are Finally Going to Talk About
    Reserves Overbooking: The Problem We Are Finally Going To Talk About Grant T. Olsen, W. John Lee, and Thomas A. Blasingame, SPE, Texas A&M University Summary create even greater potential for reserves overstatements than in Oil and gas reserves estimates that honor disclosure require- the past. ments of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Therefore, the magnitude and nature of recent alleged overstate- are critically important in the international oil and gas industry. ment cases, relative unfamiliarity with the SEC’s inner workings, Unfortunately, a number of exploration and production (E&P) and the SEC’s new reporting requirements together have created companies have allegedly overstated and subsequently written a need to discuss openly reserves disclosures and reserves over- down certain reserves volumes in recent years. In some cases, the statements. Overstatements are not confined to particular reserves consequences have been quite adverse. We document some of these categories, asset types or locations, or filer size. However, over- cases of reserves overstatements and summarize the consequences. statements are most likely to occur within the proved undeveloped Reserves write downs are of obvious interest to numerous groups (PUD) category. Reserves write downs can create nearly instanta- involved in the reserves estimation process and outcome, includ- neous value destruction for shareholders. A study of case histories ing estimators, managers, investors, creditors, and regulators. indicates that significant corporate and/or individual penalties may The magnitude and nature of recent overstatement cases, relative be associated with overstatements, along with the potential for unfamiliarity with the SEC’s inner workings, and the SEC’s new class-action lawsuits.
    [Show full text]