The Gulf War's Afterlife

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Gulf War's Afterlife The Scholar THE GULF WAR’S AFTERLIFE: DILEMMAS, MISSED OPPORTUNITIES, AND THE POST-COLD WAR ORDER UNDONE SAMUEL HELFONT 25 The Gulf War’s Afterlife: Dilemmas, Missed Opportunities, and the Post-Cold War Order Undone The Gulf War is often remembered as a “good war,” a high- tech conflict that quickly and cleanly achieved its objectives. Yet, new archival evidence sheds light on the extended fallout from the war and challenges this neat narrative. The Gulf War left policymakers with a dilemma that plagued successive U.S. administrations. The war helped create an acute humanitarian crisis in Iraq, and the United States struggled to find a way to contain a still recalcitrant Saddam Hussein while alleviating the suffering of innocent Iraqis. The failure of American leaders to resolve this dilemma, despite several chances to do so, allowed Saddam’s regime to drive a wedge into the heart of the American-led, post-Cold War order. While in the short term the war seemed like a triumph, over the years its afterlife caused irreparable harm to American interests. n June 1991, nearly 5 million onlookers en- American politics. Both the Clinton and Obama ad- thusiastically welcomed American troops ministrations admired the way President George returning home from the Gulf War as they H. W. Bush handled the conflict.5 Despite some marched in a ticker-tape parade through handwringing about Saddam Hussein remaining in NewI York City’s “Canyon of Heroes.”1 This image power and the fact that there was no World War of the Gulf War as a triumph has proved endur- II-style surrender, the conflict is still remembered ing. As two historians of the war wrote a decade as a “good war” or, as one Marine Corps general later, the Gulf War was “one of the most success- described it, a “beautiful thing.”6 Unsurprisingly, it ful campaigns in American military history.”2 For has had an outsize impact on the way Americans many Americans, the war exorcised the demons think war should be conducted.7 of Vietnam.3 Others have contrasted the success Yet, just a few miles north of the June 1991 tick- of the 1991 Gulf War with the failure of the 2003 er-tape parade, the difficulties American diplomats Iraq War.4 Such praise has transcended domestic were facing at the United Nations offered a quite 1 Susan Baer, “Desert Storm Takes N.Y. 5 Million Attend Ticker-Tape Parade,” Baltimore Sun, June 11, 1991, https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/ bs-xpm-1991-06-11-1991162064-story.html. 2 Edward J. Marolda and Robert J. Schneller Jr., Shield and Sword: The United States Navy and the Persian Gulf War (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2001), xiii. 3 E.J. Dionne Jr., “Kicking the Vietnam Syndrome,” Washington Post, March 4, 1991, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/poli- tics/1991/03/04/kicking-the-vietnam-syndrome/b6180288-4b9e-4d5f-b303-befa2275524d/. 4 Richard N. Haass, “The Gulf War: Its Place in History,” in Into the Desert: Reflections on the Gulf War, ed. Jeffrey A. Engel (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), 57–83; and Daniel P. Bolger, Why We Lost: A General’s Inside Account of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars (New York: Mariner Books, 2014). 5 Warren Christopher, In the Stream of History: Shaping Foreign Policy for a New Era (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998), 11; and Jeffery Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine,” The Atlantic, April 2016, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doc- trine/471525/. 6 Kirk Spitzer, “25 Years Later, Desert Storm Remains the Last Good War,” USA Today, Feb. 27, 2016, https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin- ion/2016/02/27/column-25-years-later-desert-storm-remains-last-good-war/81033112/. 7 Rebecca Friedman Lissner, “The Long Shadow of the Gulf War,” War on the Rocks, Feb. 24, 2016, https://warontherocks.com/2016/02/the- long-shadow-of-the-gulf-war/. 26 The Scholar different image of the war’s place in history. The establish a more sustainable policy on Iraq. Both of Gulf War had caused much more damage to Iraqi these opportunities offered a way out of the dilem- infrastructure than American officials had antic- ma that America faced in the wake of the Gulf War ipated or acknowledged. As a result, the conflict and seizing them would have led to more favorable contributed to an acute humanitarian crisis that outcomes for U.S. interests and for the post-Cold developed during and after the war. Moreover, the War system. Iraqi regime was carrying out atrocities against its Bush had sold the Gulf War as a way to forge the own people and failing to abide by the Gulf War’s post-Cold War international system into a “new ceasefire agreement that permitted U.N. inspectors world order” that would unite the globe in a liber- full access to its weapons sites. In response, the al, American-led system rooted in the rule of law.8 United States insisted on keeping economic sanc- This was a laudable goal. Yet, the fallout from that tions on Iraq in place to coerce the Iraqi regime war ultimately undermined any hopes for such a into full compliance. However, these sanctions fur- system. New archival material from the Iraqi Baath ther deepened the emerging humanitarian crisis in Party’s archives and the Clinton Library demon- Iraq, punishing civilians for the crimes of a regime strates how humanitarian issues in Iraq poisoned that they had little ability to influence. Through- American foreign relations and became a weapon out the following decade, the inability of the United for Iraq and other states to undermine American States to find a way out of this dilemma plagued leadership of the international system. The result- American diplomacy and diminished the country’s ing frustration and ill will propelled the United international standing. States into the 2003 Iraq War, which only further This outcome was not inevitable. Following the undermined its international standing. war, at least two opportunities arose for finding a Most critical analyses of the Gulf War fail to con- formula to hold Baghdad accountable while also sider the aftermath of the war.9 When they do, they alleviating the humanitarian crisis in Iraq. As new often debate whether the United States won the archival material makes clear, the American fail- Gulf War but lost the peace.10 However, that debate ure to seize either of these opportunities caused artificially separates the war from its political fall- lasting, and probably irreparable, damage to U.S. out, including the 2003 Iraq War. In fact, most de- interests and to the post-Cold War order that the bates about Iraq that occurred in 2003 — including United States wanted to build. The first opportu- debates about regime change — had their origins nity emerged from a plan in the summer of 1991 to in the dilemma that the Gulf War created for U.S. separate the humanitarian situation in Iraq from policy. This article explicitly links these events, of- the United Nations’ attempt to eliminate illicit fering a corrective to historical narratives of the Iraqi weapons programs. The second opportunity Iraq wars. arose following Bill Clinton’s election in 1992. Ira- These insights stem from new research with Ira- qi records show that once Clinton replaced Bush, qi, American, and U.N. records.11 The Iraqi archives Baghdad was prepared to adjust its approach to the are particularly interesting and have generated a United States and the international community. As wealth of new literature over the past decade.12 a result, the United States had a clear chance to However, immersing oneself in Iraqi and Arabic 8 George H. W. Bush, “Address Before a Joint Session of Congress,” Speech, Washington, DC, Sept. 11, 1990, available at the Miller Center, Uni- versity of Virginia, https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/september-11-1990-address-joint-session-congress. 9 For example, see Michael R. Gordon and Bernard E. Trainor, The Generals’ War: The Inside Story of the Conflict in the Gulf (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1995); Marvin Pokrant, Desert Storm at Sea: What the Navy Really Did (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999); Marolda and Schneller, Shield and Sword; James A. Winnefeld, Preston Niblack, and Dana J. Johnson, A League of Airmen: U.S. Air Power in the Gulf War (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1994); and Daryl G. Press, “The Myth of Air Power in the Persian Gulf War and the Future of Warfare,” International Security 26, no. 2 (Fall 2001): 5–44, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3092121. 10 Though he takes a different position than this article, Joshua Rovner provides a good overview of this debate in Joshua Rovner, “Delusion of De- feat: The United States and Iraq, 1990–1998,” Journal of Strategic Studies 37, no. 4 (2014): 482–507, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.891074. 11 In addition to some primary documents from the George H. W. Bush administration, archival records used in this article include the Ba‘th Regional Command Collection, housed at the Hoover Archives and Library, Stanford University (hereafter cited as BRCC); the Conflict Records Re- search Center, formerly housed at the National Defense University, Washington, DC (hereafter cited as CRRC); the Clinton Library Archives, housed at the William J. Clinton Presidential Library and Museum, Little Rock, AR and online at the Clinton Digital Library, https://clinton.presidentialli- braries.us (hereafter cited as Clinton Library); and the National Security Archive at George Washington University, Washington, DC and online at https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/ (hereafter cited as the National Security Archive).
Recommended publications
  • George Bush and the End of the Cold War. Christopher Alan Maynard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 From the Shadow of Reagan: George Bush and the End of the Cold War. Christopher Alan Maynard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Maynard, Christopher Alan, "From the Shadow of Reagan: George Bush and the End of the Cold War." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 297. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/297 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI fiims the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003
    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ineffectiveness of a Multinational Sanctions Regime Under
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 6-29-2011 The neffecI tiveness of a Multinational Sanctions Regime Under Globalization: The aC se of Iraq Manuel De Leon Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI11081006 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation De Leon, Manuel, "The neffeI ctiveness of a Multinational Sanctions Regime Under Globalization: The asC e of Iraq" (2011). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 463. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/463 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida THE INEFFECTIVENESS OF MULTILATERAL SANCTIONS REGIMES UNDER GLOBALIZATION: THE CASE OF IRAQ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICAL SCIENCE by Manuel De Leon 2011 To: Dean Kenneth Furton College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Manuel De Leon, and entitled The Ineffectiveness of Multilateral Sanctions Regimes Under Globalization: The Case of Iraq, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Mohiaddin Mesbahi _______________________________________ Dario Moreno _______________________________________ Astrid Arraras _______________________________________ Ronald W. Cox, Major Professor Date of Defense: June 29, 2011 The dissertation of Manuel De Leon is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Superpowers Walking a Tightrope: the Choices of April and May 1990 45
    Superpowers Walking a Tightrope: The Choices of April and May 1990 45 Chapter 3 Superpowers Walking a Tightrope: The Choices of April and May 1990 Philip Zelikow and Condoleezza Rice This essay zeroes in on just a couple of months during some tumul- tuous years. It is a phase, in the spring of 1990, that happened after the initial diplomatic engagements following the opening of the Berlin Wall and before some of the final deals started emerging during the summer and autumn of 1990. We chose to focus on these two months, in our contribution to this volume, precisely because this phase—and these choices—have re- ceived relatively little notice. It was, however, an extraordinarily deli- cate and difficult phase in which progress could well have collapsed— but did not. Just to help readers set the scene: The East German elections of March 18, 1990 decided, in effect, that a unification of Germany would take place soon and it would take place as a West German annexation of the East. March 1990 was a decisive pivot for Germany’s “internal” unification process. What diplomatically were called the “external” aspects of unification remained unsettled. These “external” aspects included more than half a million foreign troops deployed in the two Germanies under rights that dated back to the powers the victors had given themselves as occupiers in 1945. There had never been a German peace treaty that wrapped up and put aside those old powers. Though it is difficult for 21st century readers to comprehend, in early 1990 Germany was still the most heavily militarized area of real estate on the entire planet.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tyler) Priest
    Richard (Tyler) Priest Associate Professor Departments of History and Geographical and Sustainability Sciences 280 Schaeffer Hall University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 (319) 335-2096 [email protected] EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 1. Education Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Madison, History (December 1996) M.A. University of Wisconsin-Madison, History (December 1990) B.A. Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota, History (June 1986) 2. Professional and Academic Positions 2012-present Associate Professor of History and Geographical and Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa 2004-2012 Director of Global Studies and Clinical Professor, C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston 2010-2011 Senior Policy Analyst, National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling 2002-2005 Historical Consultant, History of Offshore Oil and Gas Industry in Southern Louisiana Research Project, Minerals Management Service, 2002-2005 2000-2002 Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Houston-Clear Lake 1998-2001 Chief Historian, Shell Oil History Project 1997-1998 Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for the Americas, University of Houston 1996-1997 Researcher and Author, Brown & Root Inc. History Project on the Offshore Oil Industry 1994-1995 Visiting Instructor, Middlebury College 3. Honors and Awards Collegiate Teaching Award, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Iowa, 2017 Award for Distinguished Achievement in Publicly Engaged Research, University of Iowa, 2016 Partners in Conservation Award,
    [Show full text]
  • United States Attorney Southern District of New York
    United States Attorney Southern District of New York FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OCTOBER 1, 2007 YUSILL SCRIBNER REBEKAH CARMICHAEL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE (212) 637-2600 TEXAS OILMAN ENTERS MID-TRIAL GUILTY PLEA TO CHARGES OF CONSPIRING TO MAKE ILLEGAL PAYMENTS TO THE FORMER GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ MICHAEL J. GARCIA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced the guilty plea today of OSCAR S. WYATT, JR., 83, of Houston, Texas. Nearly four weeks into his criminal trial, and on the eve of the Government resting its case, WYATT pleaded guilty to participating in a scheme to pay illegal surcharges to the former Government of Iraq in connection with the purchase of crude oil in the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program between mid-2000 and 2003. The plea was entered in Manhattan federal court before United States District Judge DENNY CHIN. Under the terms of his plea agreement, WYATT will forfeit over $11 million and begin serving his prison sentence by January 2, 2008. According to the evidence at trial and statements made during WYATT's guilty plea: The United Nations established the Oil-for-Food Program in the mid-1990's as an exception to the comprehensive international sanctions on SADDAM HUSSEIN’s regime in Iraq. Under the Program, the former Government of Iraq was allowed to sell a limited quantity of oil, and the proceeds from those oil sales were deposited into an escrow bank account managed by the United Nations. That money could only be used for humanitarian purposes approved by the United Nations, including food and medicine for the Iraqi people and reparations to the victims of the Hussein regime’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES A. BAKER, III the Case for Pragmatic Idealism Is Based on an Optimis- Tic View of Man, Tempered by Our Knowledge of Human Imperfection
    Extract from Raising the Bar: The Crucial Role of the Lawyer in Society, by Talmage Boston. © State Bar of Texas 2012. Available to order at texasbarbooks.net. TWO MOST IMPORTANT LAWYERS OF THE LAST FIFTY YEARS 67 concluded his Watergate memoirs, The Right and the Power, with these words that summarize his ultimate triumph in “raising the bar”: From Watergate we learned what generations before us have known: our Constitution works. And during the Watergate years it was interpreted again so as to reaffirm that no one—absolutely no one—is above the law.29 JAMES A. BAKER, III The case for pragmatic idealism is based on an optimis- tic view of man, tempered by our knowledge of human imperfection. It promises no easy answers or quick fixes. But I am convinced that it offers our surest guide and best hope for navigating our great country safely through this precarious period of opportunity and risk in world affairs.30 In their historic careers, Leon Jaworski and James A. Baker, III, ended up in the same place—the highest level of achievement in their respective fields as lawyers—though they didn’t start from the same place. Leonidas Jaworski entered the world in 1905 as the son of Joseph Jaworski, a German-speaking Polish immigrant, who went through Ellis Island two years before Leon’s birth and made a modest living as an evangelical pastor leading small churches in Central Texas towns. James A. Baker, III, entered the world in 1930 as the son, grand- son, and great-grandson of distinguished lawyers all named James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Partners in Making Cancer History 2012
    MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | ANNUAL REPORT 2011-2012 PARTNERS IN MAKING CANCER HISTORY® The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center gratefully acknowledges the following individuals, foundations, organizations and others who made a commitment of $1,000 or more from Sept. 1, 2011, to Aug. 31, 2012. UP, UP AND AWAY Broadcast journalist Miles O’Brien interviews Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group, before more than 750 guests during the 22nd annual A Conversation With a Living Legend® in Dallas. The discussion covered aviation, space travel and the Virgin brand, among other topics. The event raised more than $855,000. A Mr. and Mrs. Gerhard P. Adenacker Ms. Patrice Alessandra American Association for Cancer Research Mr. and Mrs. Eric Anderson Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Charles Alexander and LaVerne Alexander American Asthma Foundation Mr. and Mrs. Gregory Mark Anderson Foundation Mrs. Henrietta K. Alexander American Cancer Society Mr. and Mrs. Jack R. Anderson A & A Cattle Company Mr. Richard C. Adkerson Mr. James M. Alexander The American Endowment Foundation Mrs. Jacqueline R. Anderson Carol and Steve Aaron Mr. and Mrs. Louis K. Adler Joan and Stanford Alexander American Heart Association-Texas Mr. James Scott Anderson Mr. and Mrs. Robert L. Aaron The Adler Foundation Mr. and Mrs. John D. Alexander, Jr. American Institute for Cancer Research Mr. and Mrs. Jeff R. Anderson Abbott Fund AdvoCare International, L.P. Mr. Leslie L. Alexander American International Group, Inc. John Henry and Dora Anderson Dr. and Mrs. Christian R. Abee Aflac Leslie L. Alexander Foundation, Inc. The American Kennel Club Canine Health Karen and Charles Anderson Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing the Landscape of A&D
    nOVeMBER 2012 cSPE GulfO COaSNNECTt Section NEwSlEtter Changing the Landscape Open Officer of A&D pOsitiOns General MtG P. 11 P. 9 YOung prOfessiOnals VOlunteer OppOrtunities Distinguished Lecturer Program: CommuNity Service P. 29 A Methodology to Design Exploratory Wells Then and Now P. 5 P.26 Buddy Woodroof spegcs.org NOVEMBER 2012 1 SPE-GCS cONNECT cONNECT Information chairMan’s Newsletter Committee ChairmaN Kim Tran SALES Pat Stone CoRNER BOaRD LIAISON Valerie Martone Steve BaumgaRtner EDitor/DESiGN Deuce Creative 2012-2013 SPE-GCS Chair deucecreative.com The SPE Gulf Coast Section relies on volunteers to plan and conduct all For comments, contributions, or delivery problems, contact [email protected]. our member programs and community activities. What is volunteerism? The deadline for each issue is 6 weeks The dictionary definition is “the policy or practice of volunteering one’s before publication on the first of each time or talents for charitable, educational, or other worthwhile activities, month. The SPE Gulf Coast Section especially in one’s community”. What is a volunteer? The dictionary newsletter is published eleven times each program year and is mailed to more than definitions are “a person who voluntarily offers himself or herself for a 15,000 SPE members in Houston. service or undertaking” and “a person who performs a service willingly and without pay”. As we organize technical programs and community SPE Houston Office activities for the remainder of 2012-13 program year in the Gulf Coast Section, please reflect on the following questions before you volunteer. Gulf Coast Section Manager Kathy MacLennan I have answered question number one for you.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Article Review No
    H20-Diplo Article14 Review H-Diplo Article Review Editors: Thomas Maddux and H-Diplo Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Article Reviews Web and Production Editor: George Fujii h-diplo.org/reviews/ No. 476 Commissioned for H-Diplo by Thomas Maddux Published on 28 July 2014 Jeffrey A. Engel. “Bush, Germany, and the Power of Time: How History Makes History.” Diplomatic History 37:4 (September 2013): 639-663. DOI: 10.1093/dh/dht117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dh/dht117 URL: http://h-diplo.org/reviews/PDF/AR476.pdf Reviewed by Joshua R. Itzkowitz Shifrinson, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University Man, the State, and No War hich matters more for setting state policy: the predilections of leaders or the systemic constraints within which leaders operate? Do the particular ideas W and preferences of senior policymakers drive states, or is foreign policy largely determined by geopolitical, organizational, or economic factors over which individuals have limited control.1 Jeffrey Engel’s “Bush, Germany, and the Power of Time: How History Makes History” bears on this perennial debate by examining George H.W. Bush’s influence on United States policy towards German reunification. As the title suggests, the author comes down squarely in favor of bringing the leader back in. “The puzzle,” as Engel writes, “is not why Bush embraced German reunification as a matter of policy [. .] the puzzle is why the prospect of a unified Germany bothered him so little” (640). In his telling, American policy towards Germany in 1989-1990 cannot be divorced from the personal attitudes of George Herbert Walker Bush and Bush’s “historical sensibility” (640).
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew J. Bacevich
    ANDREW J. BACEVICH Department of International Relations Boston University 152 Bay State Road Boston, Massachusetts 02215 Telephone (617) 358-0194 email: [email protected] CURRENT POSITION Boston University Professor of History and International Relations, College of Arts & Sciences Professor, Kilachand Honors College EDUCATION Princeton University, M. A., American History, 1977; Ph.D. American Diplomatic History, 1982 United States Military Academy, West Point, B.S., 1969 FELLOWSHIPS Columbia University, George McGovern Fellow, 2014 Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame Visiting Research Fellow, 2012 The American Academy in Berlin Berlin Prize Fellow, 2004 The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Visiting Fellow of Strategic Studies, 1992-1993 The John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University National Security Fellow, 1987-1988 Council on Foreign Relations, New York International Affairs Fellow, 1984-1985 PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS Boston University Director, Center for International Relations, 1998-2005 The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Professorial Lecturer; Executive Director, Foreign Policy Institute, 1993-1998 School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Professorial Lecturer, Department of Political Science, 1995-19 United States Military Academy, West Point Assistant Professor, Department of History, 1977-1980 1 PUBLICATIONS Books and Monographs Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country. New York: Metropolitan Books (2013); audio edition (2013). The Short American Century: A Postmortem. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press (2012). (editor) Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York: Metropolitan Books (2010); audio edition (2010); Chinese edition (2011); Korean edition (2013). The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Nation Blessed” George Bush
    Naval War College Review Volume 54 Article 9 Number 4 Autumn 2001 “A Nation Blessed” George Bush Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Bush, George (2001) "“A Nation Blessed”," Naval War College Review: Vol. 54 : No. 4 , Article 9. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol54/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bush: “A Nation Blessed” The Honorable George Bush, born in 1924, became in June 1943 the U.S. Navy’s youngest commissioned pilot. Assigned to the aircraft carrier USS San Jacinto (CVL 30) in the Pacific, he flew fifty-eight combat missions and earned the Distinguished Flying Cross for “heroism and extraordinary achievement.” Graduating Phi Beta Kappa from Yale University in 1948, he entered the oil business. In 1963 he was elected chair- man of the Harris County (Texas) Republican Party and in 1966 to the U.S. House of Representatives from Texas’s Seventh District, serving two terms. Thereafter Mr. Bush was appointed U.S. ambassador to the United Nations (1971), chairman of the Republican National Committee (1973), chief of the U.S. Liaison Office in China (1974), and Director of Central Intelligence (1976). In 1980 he became vice president of the United States, and in 1988 the forty-first president of the United States.
    [Show full text]