DOCSLIB.ORG

Adlericanist Culture History Fundamentals of Time, Space, and Form Americanist Culture History Fundamentals of Time, Space, and Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ADlericanist Culture History Fundamentals of Time, Space, and Form Americanist Culture History Fundamentals of Time, Space, and Form Edited by R. Lee Lyman Michael J. 0 'Brien University ~f Missouri-Columbia Columbia. Missouri and Robert C. Dunnell University ~f Washington Seattle. Washington PLENUM PRESS • NEW YORK AND LONDON Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Americanist culture history fundamentals of time, space, and form / edited by R. Lee Lyman, Michael J. O'Brlen, and Robert C. Dunnell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-306-45539-0 (hardbound). -- ISBN 0-306-45540-4 (pbk.) I. Lyman, R. Lee. II. O'Brlen, Michael J. (Michael John), 1950- III. Dunnell, Robert C .. 1942- E77.9.A45 1997 930. 1--dc21 97-22167 CIP ISBN 0-306-45539-0 (Hardbound) ISBN 0-306-45540-4 (Paperback) © 1997 Plenum Press, New York A Division of Plenum Publishing Corporation 233 Spring Street, New York, N. Y. 10013 http://www.plenum.com All rights reserved 10987654321 No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher Preface Atbert C. Spaulding wrote in 1960 that newer paradigms and continue to be funda­ "archaeology can be defined minimally as mental within the discipline. the study of the interrelationship of form, With Spaulding's and Willey's concep­ temporal locus, and spatial locus exhibited tions as our guide, we have compiled what by artifacts. In other words, archaeologists we view as the benchmark papers in which are always concerned with these interrela­ the fundamental tenets of Americanist ar­ tionships, whatever broader interests they chaeology were developed. These papers may have, and these interrelationships are variously introduce and/or synthesize critical the special business of archaeology" (Spaul­ concepts and procedures for understanding ding [1960b:439]; references follow the In­ the archaeological record in terms of time, troduction). Gordon Willey (1953:361) said space, and form. We have been prompted to more or less the same thing, but he put it compile and reprint these papers because it more simply: "The objectives of archeol­ is our strong impression that most archae­ ogy . are approached by the study and ologists today appear to have forgotten or manipulation of three basic factors: form, tend to overlook many of the central tenets space, and time." The simplicity of this state­ of the discipline-tenets that underpin vir­ ment is beguiling. Unfortunately, there is no tually everything we do. Moreover, contem­ black box into which a piece of pottery or a porary knowledge of our discipline's past projectile point can be dropped to learn such often seems derived from secondary sources, things as when it was made, why it was made many of which often impart orientations and in one location over another, or why it took characteristics the original authors would not on the form it exhibits. Many of the means recognize. Finally, ignorance of the disci­ Americanist archaeologists use to address pline's past can result in "unnecessary origi­ questions of where, when, and why were for­ nality," as noted by Bohannan and Glazer mulated early in the twentieth century. (1988:xv), while detailed knowledge of it can These analytical tenets, or principles, were "give one a great many good ideas, for the formalized and axiomatized in later years, past never says things quite the way the pre­ and, by the middle decades of the twentieth sent needs them said" (Bohannan and century, they constituted the first formal Glazer 1988:xv). paradigm for Americanist archaeology-a All the items reprinted here were writ­ paradigm commonly termed culture history. ten by anthropologists and archaeologists That paradigm fell from favor in the 1960s, working and/or trained in the United States, yet many of its central tenets remain in and all were originally published in the Preface v twentieth century. Our coverage ends just tion of a document, references for that por­ after the birth of "processual" archaeology tion only appear at the end of the reprinted in the 1960s (see Binford [1972] and Leone portion. In several cases, the lists contain our [1972] for collections of relevant articles). corrections and updates of references. For This "processual," or "new," archaeology is example, we have indicated when and where seen by some as representing a major break a paper originally cited as "in press" was with previous archaeological epistemology published in order to enhance the value of (Willey and Sabloff 1993:214-231), while the references. This should ease the task of others see it as a continuation and elabora­ a citations analysis if one should choose to tion of much of what came before (Trigger perform such a task. We also have attempted 1989:294-303). The issue is not resolved, to keep the number of reprinted pages as but clearly something happened in the 1960s low as possible, without sacrificing content. and early 1970s. Whatever that something Thus, cover pages, title pages, and other might have been, we have taken that time relatively superfluous material are not re­ period to define the upper limit of our cov­ printed. We reprint the papers in mostly erage. As a result, the items reprinted here chronological order so that one might track represent much of the thinking of a group the intellectual development of the culture­ of archaeologists characterized by proces­ history paradigm. Exceptions comprise two sual archaeologists as "culture historians." cases in which we judged the content of the To enhance the volume both as a ref­ reprinted items to be a more significant or­ erence and as a research tool, we have re­ tained the original format and pagination of dering criterion than the date of publication. all but one of the 39 papers included. The The elements of time, space, and form single exception (Ford and Griffin 1938) was have, in various guises, assumed center stage originally produced as a mimeographed in Americanist archaeology from at least the typescript that was not acceptable for repro­ beginning of the twentieth century. That duction. Many papers are reprinted in full, stage has been crowded with actors-some including illustrations and references. In with meaty roles, others with only bit parts. other cases we have chosen to reprint only Here, we assume some familiarity on the portions of monographs or books-those part of the reader with the basic elements portions which present statements of method of the story. Elsewhere, we present a de­ or logic essential to an understanding of the tailed essay written from a critical viewpoint subject. that seeks not only to document the history References for the reprinted articles are of the culture history paradigm but also to given as they were in the original-as foot­ demonstrate why that paradigm flourished notes or as a reference list following each for a time and why it ultimately was dis­ article. In cases where we reprint only a por- carded (Lyman et al. 1997). vi Preface Acknowledgments Many societies, publishers, and individuals Archeological Nomenclature. American Anthro­ granted us permission to reprint the materi­ pologist 11:114-119. als published here. In particular, for their courtesy, the following were most helpful: American Museum of Natural History (and Valerie Wheat), for permission to reprint: American Anthropological Association (and Spier, Leslie. 1917. An Outline for a Chronology Terry Clifford), for permission to reprint: of Zuni Ruins. American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers 18(3):207-33l. Ford, James A. 1954. Comment on A. C. Spauld­ Ford, James Alfred. 1949. Cultural Dating of Pre­ ing's "Statistical Techniques for the Discovery historic Sites in Virli Valley, Peru. American of Artifact Types." American Antiquity 19:390- Museum of Natural History Anthropological Pa­ 39l. pers 43(1):29-89. Holmes, W[illiam] H. 1914. Areas of American Ford, James A. 1952. Measurements of Some Culture Characterization Tentatively Outlined Prehistoric Design Developments in the South­ as an Aid in the Study of Antiquities. American eastern States. American Museum of Natural Anthropologist 16:413-446. History, Anthropological Papers 43(3):313-384. Kidder, M[adeleine] A. and A[lfred] V. Kidder. 1917. Notes on the Pottery of Pecos. American Louisiana Geological Survey (and William Anthropologist 19:325-360. E. Marsalis), for permission to reprint: Nelson, N[els] C. 1916. Chronology of the Tano Ruins, New Mexico. American Anthropologist Ford, James A. 1936. Analysis of Village Site Col­ 18:159-180. lections from Louisiana and Mississippi. Depart­ Phillips, Philip and Gordon R. Willey. 1953. ment of Conservation, Louisiana State Geo­ Method and Theory in American Archeology: logical Survey, Anthropological Study 2. An Operational Basis for Culture-Historical In­ tegration. American Anthropologist 55:615-633. Museum of Northern Arizona (and Kathryn Rouse, Irving [B.] 1955. On the Correlation of S. Sibley), for permission to reprint: Phases of Culture. American Anthropologist 57:713-722. Colton, Harold Sellers and Lyndon Lane Har: Steward, Julian H. 1929. Diffusion and Inde­ grave. 1937. Handbook of Northern Arizona Pot­ pendent Invention: A Critique of Logic. Ameri­ tery Wares. Museum of Northern Arizona can Anthropologist 31:491-495. Bulletin 11. Flagstaff. Wright, John H., J. D. McGuire, F[rederick] W. Hodge, W[ arren] K. Moorehead, and C[harles] National Academy of Sciences, for permis­ Peabody. 1909. Report of the Committee on sion to reprint: Acknowledgments vii Kidder, A[lfred] V. 1917. A Design-Sequence nomic Classification in the Type-Variety Sys­ from New Mexico. National Academy of Sci­ tem. American Antiquity 34:278-285. ences, Proceedings 3:369-370. Spaulding, Albert C. 1954. Reply to Ford. Ameri­ Kroeber, A[lfred] L.
Recommended publications
  • A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972

    A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3d5n99tn No online items Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Processed by Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron; machine-readable finding aid created by James Lake The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, University of California --History, UC BerkeleyGeographical (by Place) --University of California --University of California BerkeleySocial Sciences --AnthropologySocial Sciences --Area and Interdisciplinary Studies --Native American Studies Guide to the A. L. Kroeber BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 1 Papers, 1869-1972 Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Collection number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron Date Completed: 1997 Encoded by: James Lake © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: A. L. Kroeber Papers, Date (inclusive): 1869-1972 Collection Number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 Creator: Kroeber, A. L. (Alfred Louis), 1876-1960 Extent: Originals: 40 boxes, 21 cartons, 14 volumes, 9 oversize folders (circa 45 linear feet)Copies: 187 microfilm reels: negative (Rich.
  • Linton, Ralph

    Linton, Ralph

    ANTHROPOLOGY THOUGHT JUNE 2019 Linton, Ralph Ralph Linton (1893–1953), American cultural anthropologist, was one of the major contributors to the reconstruction of anthropology during the second quarter of the twentieth century. Trained in the traditions of the North American “historical school” of anthropology, Lin ton remained loyal throughout his career to the broad interests and general principles established by Franz Boas and other American anthropologists. But with the publication in 1936 of The Study of Man, which was quickly recognized by social scientists all over the world as a pioneering study of human behavior, he embarked on a series of creative and stimulating studies which provided new conceptions of social structure and cultural organization. He related these conceptions in a clear if somewhat simple manner to the biological individual and his personality and utilized them in his analyses of the processes of cultural change. Linton belonged to the “third generation” of American academic anthropologists, succeeding such second-generation students of Putnam and Boas as Wissler, Dixon, Kroeber, Goldenweiser, Lowie, Sapir, and Radin. These academicians, together with a number of outstanding journeymen and masters involved more in field research than in teaching, had created a distinctive variety of anthropology. Like Tylor in England, they had a holistic approach to human studies which is still, thanks in part to Linton, a mark of American anthropology. In the Americas much more than in Europe almost all anthropological study and training had been nurtured by experience in the field and disciplined by the empiricism required by field work on specific problems treating the temporal and spatial dimensions of culture.
  • Clyde Kluckhohn

    Clyde Kluckhohn

    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C LYDE KAY MA B E N K LUCKHOHN 1905—1960 A Biographical Memoir by MELVILLE J. H ERSKOVITS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1964 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. CLYDE KAY MABEN KLUCKHOHN January n, igo^—July 28, ig6o BY MELVILLE J. HERSKOVITS HEN CLYDE KLUCKHOHN was seventeen years old ill health W caused him to spend two years in New Mexico and Arizona, on what he later described as "the fringes of the Indian Country." This experience was to be decisive in shaping his subsequent career as an anthropologist. It brought into focus what, in his own words, was "the fact that I grew up in an English settlement in Iowa and early perceived, however dimly, a cross-cultural situation." It was this perception, steadily sharpened by continuous field research, omnivorous reading, and constant probing for theoretical implica- tion, that brought him to the point of achievement and reputa- tion he had attained when a coronary thrombosis abruptly ended his life in the very Indian country where he had worked, and which he so greatly loved. During all his scientific career he consistently followed both mi- croethnographic and macroethnographic lines of anthropological in- terest. There are, in various parts of die world, those who are dis- tinguished because of the skill with which they have probed ever more deeply into particular cultures, but it is difficult to name one who is as deeply concerned with theoretical significance as with ethnographic fact.
  • Archaeological Recovery at Quebrada De La Vaca, Chala, Peru Francis A

    Archaeological Recovery at Quebrada De La Vaca, Chala, Peru Francis A

    Andean Past Volume 8 Article 16 2007 Archaeological Recovery at Quebrada de la Vaca, Chala, Peru Francis A. Riddell deceased Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/andean_past Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Architectural History and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Riddell, Francis A. (2007) "Archaeological Recovery at Quebrada de la Vaca, Chala, Peru," Andean Past: Vol. 8 , Article 16. Available at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/andean_past/vol8/iss1/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Andean Past by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECOVERY AT QUEBRADA DE LA VACA, CHALA, PERU FRANCIS A. RIDDELL Founder of the California Institute for Peruvian Studies INTRODUCTION1 Elements of the Inca road system were clearly visible as they came into the settlement. The site of Quebrada de la Vaca (PV77-3) These, combined with the excellent overall is a few kilometers west (up coast) from the condition of the ruins, made it apparent to von town of Chala in the Department of Arequipa Hagen that further investigation would make a on the south coast of Peru (Figures 1 and 2). It major contribution to his study of Inca roads. is also called Puerto Inca. Max Uhle visited Because of its clear juxtaposition to both roads Quebrada de la Vaca in 1905 (Rowe 1956:138). and the sea, as well as the extensive area of However, interest in the site developed cultivatable land that surrounds it, the following Victor von Hagen’s decision to make settlement at Quebrada de la Vaca played an investigations there an aspect of his study of the important role in Inca procurement, storage, Inca road system (von Hagen 1955).
  • Is a Listing Of

    Is a Listing Of

    Guide to the National Anihropowgical ArC'l,h'es: Smitll.(onian I,ulitlll;on. by James R. GICM, National Anthmpological Ar­ chives, National Museum of Natural History, Smith.�onian Institution, Washington D.e. 1993. No price given, iii-xvi. 314 pages . (Paper). by DouglasR. Givens DepaItmentof Bebavioral Sciences Saint Louis CommunityCollege-Meramec The historian of archaeological science will find this volume an indispensable source for cuJling research materials trom the National Anthropological Archives. The Guide is "an overview of the documentation in the Department of Anthropology. National Musemn of Natural History. concerning Native Americans and other cultural groups." (Letter to recipients from RuweD, D.d., one page). The Guide is beiDg reprintedfor sale. If you are interested in purchasing a COPY. please contact theNational Anlhropological Archives, Smitbsonian Institution in Washington D.C. at (202) 357-1976. JamesGleno, in bis introduction to the volume, discusses the history and purposeof the National Anthropological Archives and the use of theGuide. The Guide is organized into thefo llowing sections: Records andPrivate Papers, PhotographicLots, and Addenda collections. The volume alsocontains an indexby nameand subjectof the collections. TheGuide to the National Anthropowgical Archives: Smithsonian Institution is a primary researcb tool to have in the litnry of thosedoing research in the history of Americanist archaeology. A Guide to the University Museum Archives. University of Pennsylvania, prepared by Mary Elizabeth Ruwell and sratIthe of the University Museum Archives., The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 1984. No Price Given72 pages, subject/name index. (Paper) by Douglas R. Givens Departmentof BehavioralSciences Saint Louis Community College-Meramec This bookwill bequite useful to researchers in the history of archaeology who find that The University Museum of the University .
  • Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past

    Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past

    OXFORD STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGY Editorial Board BETTINA ARNOLD MICHAEL DIETLER STEPHEN DYSON PETER ROWLEY-CONWY HOWARD WILLIAMS OXFORD STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGY consists of scholarly works focusing on the history of archaeology throughout the world. The series covers the development of prehistoric, classical, colonial, and early historic archaeologies up to the present day. The studies, although researched at the highest level, are written in an accessible style and will interest a broad readership. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past MARGARITA DI´ AZ-ANDREU 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox26dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Margarita Dı´az-Andreu 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
  • Utah Historical Quarterly, Use of the Atomic Bomb

    Utah Historical Quarterly, Use of the Atomic Bomb

    78 102 128 NO. 2 NO. I VOL. 86 VOL. I 148 179 UHQ 75 CONTENTS Departments 78 The Crimson Cowboys: 148 Remembering Topaz and Wendover The Remarkable Odyssey of the 1931 By Christian Heimburger, Jane Beckwith, Claflin-Emerson Expedition Donald K. Tamaki, and Edwin P. Hawkins, Jr. By Jerry D. Spangler and James M. Aton 165 Voices from Drug Court By Randy Williams 102 Small but Significant: The School of Nursing at Provo 77 In This Issue General Hospital, 1904–1924 By Polly Aird 172 Book Reviews & Notices 128 The Mountain Men, the 179 In Memoriam Cartographers, and the Lakes 182 Contributors By Sheri Wysong 183 Utah In Focus Book Reviews 172 Depredation and Deceit: The Making of the Jicarilla and Ute Wars in New Mexico By Gregory F. Michno Reviewed by Jennifer Macias 173 Juan Rivera’s Colorado, 1765: The First Spaniards among the Ute and Paiute Indians on the Trail to Teguayo By Steven G. Baker, Rick Hendricks, and Gail Carroll Sargent Reviewed by Robert McPherson 175 Isabel T. Kelly’s Southern Paiute Ethnographic Field Notes, 1932–1934, Las Vegas NO. 2 NO. Edited by Catherine S. Fowler and Darla Garey-Sage I Reviewed by Heidi Roberts 176 Mountain Meadows Massacre: Collected Legal Papers Edited by Richard E. Turley, Jr., Janiece L. Johnson, VOL. 86 VOL. and LaJean Purcell Carruth I Reviewed by Gene A. Sessions. UHQ Book Notices 177 Cowboying in Canyon Country: 76 The Life and Rhymes of Fin Bayles, Cowboy Poet By Robert S. McPherson and Fin Bayles 178 Dime Novel Mormons Edited by Michael Austin and Ardis E.
  • Alfred Kidder II in the Development of American Archaeology: a Biographical and Contextual View Karen L

    Alfred Kidder II in the Development of American Archaeology: a Biographical and Contextual View Karen L

    Andean Past Volume 7 Article 14 2005 Alfred Kidder II in the Development of American Archaeology: A Biographical and Contextual View Karen L. Mohr Chavez deceased Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/andean_past Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Mohr Chavez, Karen L. (2005) "Alfred Kidder II in the Development of American Archaeology: A Biographical and Contextual View," Andean Past: Vol. 7 , Article 14. Available at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/andean_past/vol7/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Andean Past by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALFRED KIDDER II IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: A BIOGRAPHICAL AND CONTEXTUAL VIEW KAREN L. MOHR CHÁVEZ late of Central Michigan University (died August 25, 2001) Dedicated with love to my parents, Clifford F. L. Mohr and Grace R. Mohr, and to my mother-in-law, Martha Farfán de Chávez, and to the memory of my father-in-law, Manuel Chávez Ballón. INTRODUCTORY NOTE BY SERGIO J. CHÁVEZ1 corroborate crucial information with Karen’s notes and Kidder’s archive. Karen’s initial motivation to write this biography stemmed from the fact that she was one of Alfred INTRODUCTION Kidder II’s closest students at the University of Pennsylvania. He served as her main M.A. thesis This article is a biography of archaeologist Alfred and Ph.D. dissertation advisor and provided all Kidder II (1911-1984; Figure 1), a prominent necessary assistance, support, and guidance.
  • The Use of Building Technology in Cultural Forensics: a Pre-Columbian Case Study

    The Use of Building Technology in Cultural Forensics: a Pre-Columbian Case Study

    92 ARCHITECTURE: MATERIAL AND IMAGINED The Use of Building Technology in Cultural Forensics: A Pre-Columbian Case Study M. IVER WAHL, AIA University of Oklahoma INTRODUCTION Corners" area ofthe American Southwest is perhaps the most unique building form of the Anasazi culture, but it does not This paper poses the possibility that as early as 750 AD, seem to exist in Mesoamerica. In the world of architecture, technology transfer may have taken place between Pre- this argues significantly against significant Mesoamerican/ Columbian Peru and the Anasazi culture in UtaWColorado. Anasazi ''diffusion" theories. The possibility of such a cultural link became apparent to The prevailing theory for the "in-situ" evolution of the this researcher in 1976 while executing graduate field work kiva building type was proposed by John Otis Brew in 1946. in Central America; however, further study has awaited Brew dismissed outside cultural diffusion as necessary to adequate funding. If such transfer existed, the probable route kiva development based on his field studies at Alkali Ridge, would seem to have been from Peru north along the Pacific Utah. Briefly his theory traces the shift from the Basket I11 coast, then up the Colorado River to the San Juan area of pit house (used as a domestic residence), to the ceremonial UtaWColorado. kiva configuration common to Pueblo I1 period of the Anasazi culture. His study of this subject is thorough, and PURPOSE continues to largely accepted by archaeologists. However, The first objective of this study has been to determine if this this well-developed theory did not specifically address the tentative hypothesis is sufficiently plausible to warrant unique "corbeled-dome" or "cribbed roof structure used at further testing.
  • Noel Morss, 1904-1981

    Noel Morss, 1904-1981

    344 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 47, No. 2,1982] NOEL MORSS, 1904-1981 Noel Morss died on April 24, 1981, at the age of 77. An attorney, he was a practitioner of that uniquely Bostonian profession of "Trustee," which means he managed his own and other peo­ ple's money in effective and profitable ways. Because of the skill of these "trustees," Boston- ians, and New Englanders in general, have been able to accomplish so much during the last hun­ dred years or so. To archaeologists, however, he is the scholar who defined the Fremont Culture of eastern Utah. He began archaeological fieldwork in the mid-1920s in northern Arizona, on the Kaibito and Rainbow plateaus and in the Chinle Valley, under the inspiration of Samuel J. Guernsey and A. V. Kidder. While most of the young students of that time devoted themselves to the traditional "Southwest" of the San Juan River drainage and south­ ward into northern Arizona and New Mexico, Morss's curiosity led him northward into the can­ yons of the Colorado, Green, and Grand rivers and the mesas overlooking them. He was more and more impressed by the progressive variations on the Pueblo theme that were found as one moved northward in Utah and the continued underlying presence of the Basketmaker Culture. Barrier Canyon, the Fremont River, the Kaiparowitz Plateau, and, in northeastern Utah, Hill and Willow creeks on the East Tavaputs and the western tributaries of the Green; Range Creek, Nine Mile Can­ yon, and Minnie Maude—all these provided him with the materials from which the Fremont Culture was woven.
  • Culture History: a Culture- Historical Approach

    Culture History: a Culture- Historical Approach

    CHAPTER 2 Culture History: A Culture- Historical Approach GARY S. WEBSTER The history of ideas is concerned with all that called culture-historical. And it distinguishes culture- insidious thought, that whole interplay of rep- historical from alternate contemporaneous types of resentations that flow anonymously between texts (e.g., functional-processual, evolutionary) on the men. basis not of age or author or sociopolitical function, -Michel Foucault, but rather on the basis of the formal characteristics The Archaeology of Knowledge displayed by their statements. As with any classificatory approach, culture his- CULTUREHISTORYCAN be variously conceived. Many tory has benefits and weaknesses (Mayr 1995). On the have considered it the dominant twentieth-cen- positive side it puts order to the unwieldy variation tury paradigm prior to the New Archaeology of the displayed by the massive culture-historical literature. 1960s-at least among Anglo-American trained ar- In doing so it makes possible comparisons with other chaeologists (Strong 1952; Trigger 1989:206; Lyman such traditions, as well as their accompanying dis- et al. 1997b:v, 1997a:1; Binford 1965, 1968; Caldwell course. A classificatory approach also seems especially 1959; Meltzer 1979; Dunnell 1978; Flannery 1967). suited to a phenomenon of such uncertain historical Others, like Clarke, have seen it as a preparadigmatic integrity. For it is important to realize that culture- "disconnected bundle of inadequate sub-theories" (D. historical archaeology-its tenets and principles-was Clarke 1968:xiii). It is often written about as though largely defined in retrospect, and usually by its critics synonymous with the research histories or biographies (Lyman et al.
  • NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru Donald A

    NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru Donald A

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Research Report 05: NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Anthropology Department Research Reports series Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru 1970 NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru Donald A. Proulx University of Massachusetts - Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_res_rpt5 Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Proulx, Donald A., "NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru" (1970). Research Report 05: NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru. 7. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_res_rpt5/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology Department Research Reports series at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Report 05: NASCA Gravelots in the Uhle Collection from the Ica Valley, Peru by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. " NASCA GRAVELOTS IN THE UHLE COLLECTION FROf'1 THE ICA VALLEY, PERU by Donald A. Proulx Department of Anthropology Uni versi ty of ~Iassachusetts Amherst" 1970 .. i PREfACE This monograph is an outgrowth of research begun in 1962 when I was a graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley. At that time I began an analysis of the Nasca grave lots in the Uhle Collection under the able supervision of Dr. John H. Rowe. He and Mr. Lawrence E. Dawson of the Lowie Museum of Anthropology introduced me to seriational techniques and ceramic analysis and taught me much about the Nasca style.