DOCSLIB.ORG

Out of Sight: Informal Settlements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Out of Sight: Informal Settlements INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS social marginality, obstacles to access to healthcare and basic needs for migrants, asylum seekers and refugees SECOND EDITION FUORI CAMPO 1 TABLE INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION OF CONTENTS RECEPTION SYSTEM AND BORDERS 3 SOCIAL MARGINALIZATION 6 OCCUPIED BUILDINGS 8 FORCED EVICTIONS 10 his report is the follow up of and refugees in informal settlements, healthcare and psychological support the research contained in Fuori regardless of their legal status, was set up in the disused buildings OBSTACLES TO ACCESS THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE 12 Tcampo - Asylum seekers and have less and less opportunities to where men, women and children live refugees in Italy: unofficial settlements access medical treatment. Hospital in disgraceful conditions. THE BORDERS AT COMO AND VENTIMIGLIA 14 and social marginalisation1. It is emergency services are fast becoming THE DEADLY BORDER 17 the result of constant monitoring the only gateway to the Italian In Bari and Torino, MSF has worked activities carried out in 2016 and 2017 National Health System. in buildings occupied by migrants THE BRENNER ROUTE AND TRENTINO ALTO ADIGE 18 by way of repeated field visits and and refugees, seeking to overcome In the last two years, more than their marginalisation by facilitating FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA 20 in collaboration with an extensive network of local associations. twenty people have died attempting access to the National Health TURIN 22 to cross the borders with France, Service. MSF volunteers work The reception system for asylum Austria and Switzerland. Migrants alongside professionals in these ROME 24 seekers and refugees, expanding suffer repeated border rejection, activities, raising awareness on the PUGLIA 30 to reach just over 180,000 places often accompanied by violence. lack of access to healthcare that as of 31 December 2017, continues The number of people stranded at marginalised migrants and refugees CIVIL SOCIETY AND CRIMINALISATION OF SOLIDARITY 32 to be based, for the most part, on the borders and living in unofficial experience. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 extraordinary reception structures settlements is increasing, with limited in which services aimed at social access to basic needs and healthcare. MSF saw Italian citizens living in LIST OF INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS 36 inclusion are limited. informal settlements – as well as in Throughout Italy, volunteers and self-organised occupations – in Rome, MSF IN INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS 38 There are pockets marginalization activists are helping migrants as marginalised as their migrant MÉDECINS SANS FRONTIÈRES IN ITALY 39 in urban and rural areas across excluded from the reception system, neighbours. This is not an isolated Italy. The raise in forced evictions, supporting them to access basic case in Italy. GLOSSARY 40 combined with a lack of alternative services and care. Opposition to their housing solutions, result in work has, in some cases, resulted in The report confirms the estimate the fragmentation of informal judicial proceedings against them. indicated in the first edition of Fuori settlements, especially in urban Campo: there are at least 10,000 contexts: migrants and refugees live In 2016 and 2017, Médecins Sans people excluded from the reception in increasingly hidden locations in a Frontières (MSF) strengthened its system, including holders and state of growing fear and frustration, commitment to supporting migrants applicants of international and with progressively limited contact in unofficial settlements. In Como humanitarian protection, with with local services, including and Ventimiglia, a psychological first- limited or no access to basic needs healthcare. aid programme was implemented and medical care2. The distribution of for people in transit, together with such settlements is fragmented and Due to administrative barriers, and a Women's healthcare programme widespread throughout the country. despite the laws in force, migrants in Ventimiglia. In Rome, primary First edition February 2018 1. Médecins Sans Frontières, April 2016. © Medici Senza Frontiere 2. This number refers to the sites monitored in the survey and cannot be considered www.msf.it a census of the total number of asylum seekers and refugees living in all the Front cover: informal settlements throughout Italy. © Alessandro Penso, Borgo Mezzanone (FG) All the photos are by A. Penso except p. 5 e 6: Giuseppe De Mola; p. 17 and 39: Giuseppe La Rosa FUORI CAMPO 2 3 1. Memorandum between Italy and Libya, signed on 2 February 2017. Cf. http://www.governo. it/sites/governoNEW.it/files/Libia.pdf RECEPTION SYSTEM AND BORDERS 2. Articulated in First Aid and Assistance Centres, First Reception Centres (formerly, CARA) and second reception centres of the SPRAR network to ordinary places and in After the peaks of 2016, 2017 saw an a first appeal5). To speed the asylum Extraordinary Reception Centres (CAS) to overall decrease in the number of be used only in cases of lack of ordinary process up, the government has places and only for limited periods of time, cf. landings – predominantly because of adopted a series of measures, such Legislative Decree no. 142/2015. containment measures implemented as establishing migration specialised 3. With the Decree from the Ministry of the following the agreement between sections within each ordinary court, Interior of 10 August 2016, the procedure Italy and Libya1 – and a parallel and abolishing the second level of to access the SPRAR projects has been increase in asylum applications. simplified. With the ‘safeguard clause’ appeal. This has led to doubts about contained in the Ministerial Directive The full implementation of the whether such lowering of the standards of 11 October 2016, the Municipalities “hotspot approach” resulted in the of legal protection for asylum seekers belonging to SPRAR are exempt from the forced registration of almost all of is constitutional, and has provoked activation of further forms of reception (CAS), whilst with the Circular issued in the migrants arriving in Italy. This criticism from associations in the August 2017, the Ministry of the Interior has contained the secondary movements sector6. provided instructions for the conversion of towards countries further North. the available places in the CAS in SPRAR Other factors are putting pressure ones. About 15% of the Municipalities in By 31 December 2017, the reception on the reception system. First is the Italy have joined to the SPRAR network. system2 had 183,681 places, a slight increasing number of asylum seekers 4. To date, 20 Territorial Commissions and increase compared to 2016. Despite of in other countries being sent back 28 additional sections are operational the government attempts to promote to Italy under the Dublin Regulation. for a total of 48 commissions. the model of the Protection System for Second is the failure of the relocation 5. ANCI, Caritas Italiana, Cittalia, Fondazione Migrantes, SPRAR in collaboration with Refugees and Asylum Seekers (SPRAR), procedure decided by the EU Council in UNHCR, Report on International Protection managed by the Municipalities3 September 2015 to transfer a number in Italy 2017. The percentage of denials on the number of asylum seekers and of asylum seekers from Italy and the number of asylum seekers who were Greece to other member States7. given accommodation was 57% in the first refugees in the SPRAR network stood half of 2017, inclusive of the 5% who were at 31,270 on the same date, just 17% of Current legislation envisages that a unreachable. With regard to the appellants the total. at first instance, 49.5% of the proceedings person gains access to the reception are still underway, whilst the remaining The chronic shortage of places in the system as soon as they apply for percentages of appeals accepted and reception centres, is due not only to asylum8. However, in practice (for rejected are equivalent. Amongst the appeals migrants who independently present presented to the Court of Appeal that have the increasing numbers of asylum received a definitive outcome (40%), seven applications, but also to the low themselves at police stations), access cases out of 10 were given protection. levels of turnover in the centres due to the system is postponed until 6. Cf. ASGI, Law no. 46 of 13 April 2017 to the time required for assessing the the asylum seekers formalise their containing proceedings on international applications. Despite the increase application by completing the C3 Form. protection, as well as for tackling illegal This results in applicants waiting for immigration. Initial interpretative in Territorial Commissions in recent reflections, https://www.asgi.it/ years4, the time elapsing between first weeks – and sometimes months – wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Scheda- applying for asylum and being notified without any form of assistance. This pratica-legge-Minniti-DEF_2.pdf of the result averages 307 days. In has been seen, for example, in police 7. 11,464 migrants have been relocated from the case of denial of protection and stations near large reception centres Italy before 31 December 2017 and 698 the lodging of an appeal, the time such as in Gorizia, Bari, Crotone and migrants are in the relocation process at Caltanissetta. present (Source: Ministry of the Interior). spent in the centres can increase to a 8. Legislative Decree no. 142/2015, Article 1.2. further 10 months (the average time EU Directive 2013/33 establishes required to achieve an outcome after the possibility to revoke the asylum 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 200,000 100,000 150,000 80,000 100,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 0 20,000 2012 2013 2014 0 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2017 First reception + LANDINGS 13,267 42,925 170,100 153,842 181,436 119,310 extraordinary places 26,500 35,562 76,683 153,602 152,411 ASYLUM 17,352 26,620 64,886 83,970 123,600 130,180 SPRAR 3,979 10,381 20,752 19,715 22,952 31,270 REQUESTS OUT OF SIGHT RECEPTION SYSTEM AND BORDERS 4 5 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Migreurop Annual Report 2010-2011 EN
    Annual report 2010-2011 Translation : Eleanor Staniforth MIGREUROP 21ter Rue Voltaire 75011 Paris [email protected] www.migreurop.org +3315327878 I – REMINDER OF MIGREUROP’S OBJECTIVES The Migreurop network was established in 2002 by campaigners who met at a time when the Sangatte camp – a prime example of the absurdity of European migration policy - was receiving intense media attention. The network’s initial aim was to raise awareness of and denounce the increasing detention of migrants and the multiplication of camps in Europe, measures which are at the heart of the European Union’s migration policy. It quickly became clear that the Sangatte camp, far from being an exception, was a mere cog in the European machine for the large-scale exclusion of foreigners. Initially, Migreurop’s work on detention and camps developed around four axes: 1. Gathering information on a phenomenon which is difficult to pin down not only because it is largely hidden, but also because of the geographical scale of the issue (the externalised camps located in Libya and the Ukraine are the collateral effects of these countries’ privileged partnerships with the European Union). 2. Giving a name to a multifaceted reality to which the classic image of camps surrounded by barbed wire does not do justice. The term ‘Europe of camps’ has been adopted to refer to the set of measures which constitute points of forced interruption in migrants’ itineraries. Preventing migrants from crossing a border or from entering a territory, keeping them under ‘house arrest’ either legally or through police harassment, detaining them to ensure that they can be deported and imprisoning them as punishment for crossing the border are but a few of the manifestations of this ‘Europe of camps’.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting Europeanism: Migrant Solidarity Activism in the European Union
    CONTESTING EUROPEANISM: MIGRANT SOLIDARITY ACTIVISM IN THE EUROPEAN UNION CELINE CANTAT CMRB, UEL / MIGRINTER, UNIVERSITE DE POITIERS INTEGRIM ONLINE PAPERS Nº8/2015 “The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 316796” Introduction In this paper, I present some of the findings emerging from my PhD research, which is concerned with the discourses and practices of pro-migrant organisations in the European Union (EU). This topic deals with fundamental questions addressing the core of the European project: the extent to which the European Union welcomes and accommodates non-European migrants can indeed be conceptualised as a test-case for claims of a post-national and cosmopolitan Europe. Soysal (1994), for example, has argued on numerous occasions that, in western European societies and under the pressure brought about by the experience of post-war immigration, national citizenship is losing ground to a more universal model of membership grounded in a deterriorialised notion of personal rights. In this perspective, European citizenship, perceived as a post-national relation between a new form of political entity and the residents of its territory, has been upheld as possessing a great potential for challenging the national concept of citizenship and providing protection and rights outside the framework of the state-citizen relationship. My PhD research proposes to examine such claims by, first, interrogating the nature of the European Union and the associated notions of European identity and citizenship and, second, looking at the types of mobilisation emerging in support of migrants and the impact of these mobilisations on dominant notions of Europeanness.
    [Show full text]
  • Böll-Stiftung, Dossier: Border Politics
    Border Politics Migration in the Mediterranean DOSSIER Impressum Herausgeber Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Schumannstraße 8 10117 Berlin www.boell.de Das Online-Dossier wurde veröffentlicht auf www.migration-boell.de im Juli 2009. Direktlink: http://www.migration-boell.de/web/migration/46_2173.asp V.i.S.d.P. Olga Drossou, MID-Redaktion, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Dossier-Redakteur: Timon Mürer Picture credits Cover photo: home to go, 2001, Plaster, marble, dust, tiles, rope, dimensions variable p. 4: The Line 2007; Dyptich framed photograph, cm 60 x 74.5 each (framed), p. 34: Centro di permanenza temporanea, 2007, Video still p. 49: Centro di permanenza temporanea, 2007, Video still They appear by courtesy of gallery Francesca Kaufmann, Milan. The art works presented in this dossier are all by Adrian Paci, an Albanian artist born 1969 in Shkoder and now based in Milan. Among other awards, he is has won the Prize of the Quadrennial of Rome 2008. Of growing international renown, his work has been exhibited all across Europe, in Israel, Australia, and the United States. In his work, Adrian Paci frequently makes reference to the experience and fate of migrants, as for example in his prize-winning video “Centro di Permanenza Temporanea” (2007). The title refers to the Italian name for the temporary camps for migrants arriving daily on the Italian coast. Linguistically, it offers a paradox, a tension between a temporary and permanent existence, a tension Paci maintains in this film, where men and women board a plane to nowhere. They remain trapped between the transitory and the fixed, a state which speaks to the dislocation of migrants across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Border “Imagination Battle”: an Examination of the European Neighborhood Policy in Morocco
    THE ANTI-BORDER “IMAGINATION BATTLE”: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY IN MOROCCO A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Walsh School of Foreign Service of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service By Leah Sabin Kanzer Washington, D.C. April 20, 2020 1 Poem by Gloria Anzaldúa, Borderlands/ La Frontera (p.24) ​ ​ 2 Abstract This thesis examines the ways in which borders are enforced and imagined. The author uses public EU documents, expert interviews and anti-border scholarship to explore the oppressive nature of borders. Specifically, she focuses on how the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) tasks Morocco with policing its Northern border with Spain to protect the Schengen Zone. Morocco’s participation in the ENP demonstrates why anti-border thinkers and activists believe that borders uphold racism, wealth inequality and colonialism. This paper aims to convince readers to participate in what adrienne maree brown calls an “imagination battle” by questioning the current institution of borders and envisioning how humans can organize ourselves in the future. Acknowledgements I feel so grateful for the chance to work on this project, whose topic is, as Taieb Belghazi says, “deeply close to my heart.” I could not have done it without the endless support of my family, who keep me close even when I’m very far (3,531 miles) away. I also feel so lucky for the Lotfis, my family away from home. I would like to thank Dean Pirotti, Professor Brennan who helped me throughout this whole process.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Countries to See by Rail: Your Guide to Train Travel in Europe *
    TOP 10 COUNTRIES TO SEE BY RAIL: YOUR GUIDE TO TRAIN TRAVEL IN EUROPE Gjøvik Bergen Elverum Vainikkala Lahti Kouvola Gävle Loimaa Thurso Hønefossnefo Roa Rihimäki Kongsvinger Gardermoen Borlänge Hyvinkää Torsby Turku Wick Kerava Kotka Norway Oslo Ludvika 12h Salo Charlottenberg Espoo Northern Europe Drammen Helsinki Kongsberg Arvika Uppsala Maarianhamina Karjaa Narvik Riksgränsen Nordagutu Moss Kil Västeråsterås Hanko 2h Karlstad 18h Kiruna Kyle of Lochalsh StavangerStavanger Sarpsborg Kristinehamn ArlandArlandaa ( 0 100 200 300 Eskilstuna Mallaig Inverness SandefjordSandefjord 15h Tallinn Neslandsvatn Larvik Halden Örebro distances in kilometres Kornsjø Stockholm Lofoten Fort William LaLangesundngesund Laxå 0 50 100 150 200 Bodø Sira Strömstad Vänern Hallsberg Katrinholm distances in miles Kolari Aberdeen Arendal Fauske Egersund Kemijärvi Oban Gällivare KristiansandKristiansand Uddevalla Skövde Motala Estonia Rovaniemi Perth Nyköping TTrollhättanrollhättan Norrköping Mo i Rana Jokkmokk Dundee k Falköping Linköping a Mosjöen Glasgow r Haparanda e r Boden a g Skagen 17h S k Jönköpingng Tornio Kemi Hirtshals Luleå Londonderry Edinburgh Göteborg Hjørring Borås Västervik Frederikshavn avn Nässjö Russia Ballina Sligo 1h45min Northern Thisted K Hultsfred Arvidsjaur CCairnryanairnryan Oulu a Oskarshamn Westport Ireland Great Ålborg SwedeSwedenn Storuman t Varberg Grong a BelfBelfastast Stranraer t Berga i DeDenmarkn e n Kontiomäki Struer Skive Gotland Lycksele Carlisle g h Kajaani Latvia Steinkjer t Viborgorg Halmstad a Riga Republic of Holstebro
    [Show full text]
  • “No Borders, No Nations” Or “Fortress Europe”? How European Citizens Remake European Borders
    “No Borders, No Nations” or “Fortress Europe”? How European Citizens Remake European Borders Sabine Volk 1 Introduction: The Borders of Europe? Étienne Balibar famously claimed that the borders of Europe constituted an ‘unre- solved political problem’.1 Indeed, no matter which lens – geographical, cultural, or political – applied to the notion of Europe, its external borders remain a highly inconsistent, ambiguous and contradictory matter. Since the signing of the Schengen Agreement in 1985 and its incorporation into the European Union (EU) legal framework in 1997, public discourse usually conflates the European external borders with the borders of the growing Schengen area. While Schengen shifted the responsibility to manage the European external borders to the most peripheral EU member states, the EU also got increasingly involved. The establishment of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, commonly known as Frontex, in Warsaw in 2004, is the most visible expression of the EU’s fledgling border re- gime. While enabling the free movement of people across former national borders, it nevertheless seems that Schengen has put in place new borders and boundaries. The EU’s external border policies have become increasingly restrictive over time. Indeed, the establishment of Frontex primarily indicates the tightening of the EU’s 1 Étienne Balibar, We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship, trans. J. Swenson (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 2, emphasis in original. 78 Volk border regime.2 These major changes in European border management have not gone unnoticed by European citizens. In fact, Europeans are today more active in the issue of the European space and its borders, challenging the current state of borders and control practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Management and Gender Angela Mackay
    Tool 6 Gender and SSR Toolkit Border Management and Gender Angela Mackay Geneva Centre for the DCA F Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Border Management and Gender Angela Mackay Geneva Centre for the DCAF Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Gender and SSR Toolkit About the Author Angela Mackay is an independent consultant, specialised in conflict management, gender, human rights and human trafficking. Until June 2007, she was part of an International Centre for Migration Policy Development implementation team that established and developed training materials for the Kosovo Border and Boundary Police Training Unit. Formerly Director of Programmes at the Pearson Peacekeeping Training Centre (Canada), she developed and tested the first ‘Gender and Peacekeeping’ training materials for the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations. In 2002, Angela was the Chief of the Office of Gender Affairs in the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. She also developed and delivered counter-trafficking training for the International Organisation for Migration in Macedonia and Kosovo. Editors Megan Bastick and Kristin Valasek, DCAF Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their valuable comments on drafts of this tool: Martha L. Cottam, Vanessa Farr, Werner Fasching, Hermann Fuertmueller, Marcelyn L. Thompson and UN-INSTRAW. In addition, we would like to thank Benjamin Buckland, Anthony Drummond and Mugiho Takeshita for their editing assistance, and Anja Ebnöther for her guidance of the project. The Gender and SSR Toolkit This Tool on Border Management and Gender is part of a Gender and SSR Toolkit. Designed to provide a practical introduction to gender issues for security sector reform practitioners and policy-makers, the Toolkit includes the following 12 Tools and corresponding Practice Notes : 1.
    [Show full text]
  • “There Are No Angels in Calais” the Impact of French Migration Policies on the Migrants of Calais
    “There are no Angels in Calais” The impact of French migration policies on the migrants of Calais. Merijn van Nuland Human Geography, specialization: Europe: Borders, Identities & Governance. Email: [email protected] Student number: 0603031 Thesis supervisor: Henk van Houtum - 2 - “In fact, we are the untouchables to the civilians. They think, more or less explicitly— with all the nuances lying between contempt and commiseration—that as we have been condemned to this life of ours, reduced to our condition, we must be tainted by some mysterious, grave sin. They hear us speak in many different languages, which they do not understand and which sound to them as grotesque as animal noises; they see us reduced to ignoble slavery, without hair, without honor and without names, beaten every day, more abject every day, and they never see in our eyes a light of rebellion, or of peace, or of faith. They know us as thieves and untrustworthy, muddy, ragged and starving, and mistaking the effect for the cause, they judge us worthy of our abasement. Who could tell one of our faces from another? For them we are Kazet, a singular neuter word.” (Levi, 1958) - 3 - - 4 - I head for the clothes distribution organized by Secours Catholique in an old church in the Rue de Croy. Shadows on the wall give away the places where angels once stood. (travel diary: 5th of May) - 5 - - 6 - Summary. Calais, where France almost touches Great-Britain, is one of the many spots in Europe where immigration is highly visible. Because of its location, it has been an important knot for immigrants trying to reach the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/26353 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/26353 19. Wahlperiode 02.02.2021 Kleine Anfrage des Abgeordneten Johannes Huber und der Fraktion der AfD Der European Council on Foreign Relations, die Open Society Foundations und die Bundesregierung Im Jahr 2007 wurde der „European Council on Foreign Relations“ (ECFR) ge- gründet, unter anderem finanziert vom Auswärtigen Amt, der Europäischen Kommission, der Open Society Foundation, der Robert Bosch Stiftung und der Mercator Stiftung. Dem ECFR gehören u. a. auch amtierende deutsche Politiker an, welche in ei- nem jährlichen Treffen zu einer Generalversammlung zusammenkommen (https://www.ecfr.eu/berlin/de/council). Auf die Schriftliche Frage 35 des Abgeordneten Johannes Huber auf Bundes- tagsdrucksache 19/16951 antwortete die Staatssekretärin des Auswärtigen Amts Antje Leendertse: „Die Bundesregierung steht mit einer Vielzahl von Vertreterinnen und Vertretern aus Wissenschaft, Forschungsinstituten und der Zivilgesellschaft in Kontakt. Erkenntnisse aus diesen Kontakten fließen in die vorbereitende Diskussion zu politischen Entscheidungen und zum Regierungs- handeln ein.“ Wir fragen die Bundesregierung: 1. Welche Bundesmittel flossen im Jahr 2019 direkt oder indirekt, projektge- bunden oder auf sonstige Weise an den European Council on Foreign Rela- tions (bitte Einzelposten chronologisch unter Nennung der Summe und des Verwendungszwecks angeben)? 2. Wie viele finanzielle Mittel flossen nach Kenntnis der Bundesregierung im Jahr 2019 indirekt von der Bundesregierung über die Institutionen und Kör- perschaften
    [Show full text]
  • Practices of Refugee Support Between Humanitarian Help And
    Larissa Fleischmann Contested Solidarity Culture and Social Practice Larissa Fleischmann, born in 1989, works as a Postdoctoral Researcher in Human Geography at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. She received her PhD from the University of Konstanz, where she was a member of the Centre of Excellence »Cultural Foundations of Social Integration« and the Social and Cultu- ral Anthropology Research Group from 2014 to 2018. Larissa Fleischmann Contested Solidarity Practices of Refugee Support between Humanitarian Help and Political Activism Dissertation of the University of Konstanz Date of the oral examination: February 15, 2019 1st reviewer: Prof. Dr. Thomas G. Kirsch 2nd reviewer: PD Dr. Eva Youkhana 3rd reviewer: Prof. Dr. Judith Beyer This publication was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Re- search Foundation) - Project number 448887013. The author acknowledges the financial support of the Open Access Publication Fund of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. The field research for this publication was funded by the Centre of Excellence “Cultural Foundations of Social Integration”, University of Konstanz. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 (BY- NC) license, which means that the text may be remixed, build upon and be distributed, provided credit is given to the author, but may not be used for commercial purposes. For details go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Permission to use the text for commercial purposes can be obtained by contacting rights@ transcript-publishing.com Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Across the Borders of Lesvos: the Gendering Of
    open space 94 across the borders of Lesvos: the gendering of migrants’ detention in the Aegean Gabriella Alberti It is late summer and the first large demonstration organized by the No Border camp against Pagani, the detention centre for undocumented migrants, takes place in Mytilene. Mytilene is the main city of Lesvos, which is the largest of the islands scattered in the Aegean Sea between Greece and Turkey. Pagani is supposed to be a ‘reception centre’ for undocumented migrants arriving on Lesvos from outside the European Union (EU). It is, in fact, a prison where migrants are detained for days or months in order to be identified by the local authorities before they are set ‘free’ to move on to the mainland. I joined the protest organized by the No Border network against the detention and deportation of migrants in Europe and internationally. The politics of the No Border groups are rooted in a commitment to unrestricted freedom of movement as a basic right for all people, and the need to mobilize against inhumane and degrading border controls (Kopp and Schneider, 2003, http://www.makeworlds.org/node/29). Lesvos is a particular location in which to observe and contrast the operation of the EU border policing as a major ‘transit point’ for migrants on the edge of the continent. The march proceeds towards Pagani. It is hot, and the police block the street before we can see the entrance of the prison. Yet, the voices of the migrants behind the bars quickly permeate the police cordon with their longing for freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Defi International Students Brochure
    Department of Engineering for Innovation (DEfI) #exchange students #enrolment #Erasmus+ students BACK TO NEXT HOME Outline of he Department of Engineering for Innovation (DEfI) The Department of Engineering for Innovation focuses on new technologies and aims at promoting and disseminating technology innovation. Staff includes 98 tenured faculties and 130 among PhDs, post-docs and research fellows active in the research fields of: Renewable Energies, Materials Science & Technologies, ICTs, IoT, HPC, V&A Reality, Nanotechnologies, Automation & Robotics, Machine Processing Systems & Technologies, Mechanical & Aerospace Design, Intelligent & Clean Manufacturing Techs, Management Engineering, Design and Testing in Mechanical & Civil Engineering, Fluid Dynamics & Machinery, Bio- applications. Many prestigious results and awards in several research areas have been and are being obtained at international level by the Department research staff. Research activities have been carried out in several national and international projects funded by the Italian Ministry for Education University and Research, by main Italian research centres (ENEA, ASI CNR, INFM, INFN) and by the European Union (in the FP5, FP6 and FP7 programs). Find a place Find a contact BACK TO HOME BACK NEXT 7 Master Programs Focus • Civil Engineering • Mechanical Engineering New Technologies • Aerospace Engineering (taught in Promotion of Innovation English) • Management Engineering (taught in Technology Transfer English) • Communication Engineering & Electronic Technologies (taught
    [Show full text]