Representative Don Young (R-AK-At Large)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance; Adding BMC Chapter 13.106
Page 1 of 37 Office of the Mayor ACTION CALENDAR March 10, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Mayor Jesse Arreguín, Councilmembers Cheryl Davila, Kate Harrison, Ben Bartlett Subject: Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance; Adding BMC Chapter 13.106 RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a first reading of the Ronald V. Dellums Fair Chance Access to Housing Ordinance, adding Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter 13.106 and; 2. Direct the City Manager to take all necessary steps to implement this chapter including but not limited to developing administrative regulations in consultation with all relevant City Departments including the Rent Stabilization Board, preparing an annual implementation budget, designating hearing officers and other necessary staffing for administrative complaint, exploring the development of a compliance testing program similar to that used by the Seattle Office of Civil Rights, developing timelines and procedures for complaints, conducting outreach and education in partnership with the Alameda County Fair Chance Housing Coalition, and referring program costs to the June budget process. POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On November 7, 2019, the Land Use, Housing, and Economic Development Committee adopted the following action: M/S/C (Droste/Hahn) to move the item with amendments and subject to additional technical revisions with a positive recommendation. Vote: All Ayes. BACKGROUND The City of Berkeley, along with other California urban areas, has seen an unprecedented increase in homelessness, with dire public health and safety consequences. This proposed Fair Chance Housing Ordinance serves as critical strategy to house currently unhoused people and also prevent more people from becoming homeless. -
Board Packet February 6, 2020 Meeting of February 6, 2020 FOR: INFORMATION
Tulare Joint Union High School District Board Packet February 6, 2020 Meeting of February 6, 2020 FOR: INFORMATION TULARE JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECEIVE: Quarterly Board Policy Revisions Background: The Administration reviews CSBA’s recommended amendments for board policies on a quarterly basis to ensure that the District is in compliance with State and Federal regulations. Current Considerations: The Administration is recommending revisions to Board Policies per CSBA’s recommendations. Attached is the CSBA Policy Guide Sheet to summarize the revisions. The wording on the revised policies has been shaded to indicate revisions. If the policy is new to the District, it will state it as “NEW”. The following Board Policies are being presented for your review: BP 1112 Media Relations [Orisio] BP 3551 Food Service Operations/Cafeteria Fund [Hamilton] BP 5136 Gangs [Aldaco] BP 6142.2 World Language Instruction [Van Scyoc] BP 6145.6 International Exchange [Van Scyoc] BP 6174 Education for English Learners [Van Scyoc] BP 6179 Supplemental Instruction [Van Scyoc] BB 9321 Closed Session [Rodriguez] Fiscal Implications: There are no fiscal implications associated with these revisions. Tulare Joint Union High School District Board Priorities: Improve Student Outcomes and Performance Manage Facilities and Student Growth Maintain the Fiscal Integrity of the District and Fund the Board’s Priorities Staff the TJUHSD with Qualified Personnel and Maintain a Positive Work Environment Maintain Safe Schools Continue to Strengthen Internal and External Communication Systems SUBMITTED BY: Mr. Tony Rodriguez Prepared By: Tony Rodriguez, Superintendent POLICY GUIDE SHEET July 2019 Page 1 of 3 Note: Descriptions below identify revisions made to CSBA's sample board policies, administrative regulations, board bylaws, and/or exhibits. -
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House). -
TITLE FIRST LAST IAL 2016 LSTA 2016 STATE Rep. Don Young Y
IAL LSTA TITLE FIRST LAST 2016 2016 STATE Rep. Don Young Y Alaska Rep. Mike Rogers Y Alabama Rep. Terri Sewell Y Alabama Rep. Raul Grijalva Y Y Arizona Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick Y Arizona Rep. Martha McSally Y Arizona Rep. Kyrstan Sinema Y Arizona Rep. Xavier Becerra Y California Rep. Karen Bass California Rep. Julia Brownley Y Y California Rep. Lois Capps Y Y California Rep. Tony Cardenas Y Y California Rep. Judy Chu Y Y California Rep. Jim Costa Y California Rep. Susan Davis Y California Rep. Mark DeSaulinier Y Y California Rep. John Garamendi Y Y California California Rep. Janice Hahn Y California Rep. Jared Huffman Y California Rep. Barbara Lee Y California Rep. Zoe Lofgren Y California California Rep. Alan Lowenthal Y California Rep. Doris Matsui Y California California Rep. Kevin McCarthy California Rep. Jerry McNerney Y Y California California Rep. Grace Napolitano Y California California Rep. Scott Peters Y California Rep. Raul Ruiz California California Rep. Linda Sanchez Y California California Rep. Loretta Sanchez Y Y California California Rep. Adam Schiff Y Y California Rep. Brad Sherman California Rep. Jackie Speier Y California California Rep. Eric Swalwell Y California Rep. Mark Takano Y Y California Rep. Mike Thompson Y California Rep. Juan Vargas Y California California Rep. Maxine Waters Y Y California California Rep. Diana DeGette Y Y Colorado Rep. Jared Polis Y Colorado Colorado Rep. Joe Courtney Y Connecticut Rep. Elizabeth Esty Y Y Connecticut Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes Y Connecticut Rep. John Larson Y Connecticut Rep. John Carney Y Delaware Delegate Eleanor Norton Y Y District of Columbia Rep. -
Congressional Record—House H3781
May 14, 2019 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3781 Is it time to recognize Taiwan as an get issued by the Communist Party a proved, churches have been razed and wor- independent country, a thriving democ- good citizen score. But, Mr. Speaker, shippers subjected to detainment, physical in- racy, our eleventh largest trading part- you don’t know what your score is. So terrogation, and thought reform conditioning. ner? when you show up to travel, if your In the west, in Xinjiang Province, the United I want to bring up the South China score is not high enough, then you get Nations has reported the government to be Sea. denied travel. If you go to borrow holding roughly one million Uygurs without Mr. Speaker, how much time do I money or use your banking system, charge. Those who have escaped have testi- have remaining? you are denied your banking system. fied to being repeatedly told that God did not The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen- Your kids can’t go to the colleges you exist and that they would only be fed after ac- tleman from Florida has 9 minutes re- want them to go to because you are de- knowledging the greatness of communism. maining. nied because you are a bad citizen. Mr. Speaker, I encourage this Congress and Mr. YOHO. Mr. Speaker, I will try to They have extended this and offered our President to take appropriate actions to tighten this up. this to Russia; they have extended this promote religious freedom of religious minori- Mr. Speaker, China, in the South and offered it to Maduro in Venezuela; ties in the People’s Republic of China. -
Calling on the Census Bureau
September 3, 2020 Dr. Steven Dillingham Director United States Census Bureau 4600 Silver Hill Road Washington, DC 20233 Dear Dr. Dillingham: This letter is to inquire about the U.S. Census Bureau’s plans for accurately counting our country’s population in the 2020 Census. In California, nearly 15 percent of our residents remain uncounted, many in historically undercounted communities at risk of losing federal funding and resources. In light of the challenges created by COVID-19, the fires burning across California, and the recent decision to end counting operations early, we ask that you provide additional detail about how a complete count will be achieved. It is our understanding that with the shortened counting timeline, Census Bureau workers will need to visit 8 million more homes nationwide than in 2010, in just seven weeks instead of ten weeks. Data accuracy and review procedures for processing apportionment counts have also been reduced from six months to three months. Additional obstacles caused by COVID-19 include a higher number of people experiencing homelessness—an historically undercounted population—as well as difficulties with hiring and retention of census workers. Given these significant barriers to a fair and accurate census, we would appreciate answers to the following questions. With in-person counting operations cut short, the Census Bureau will likely need to utilize administrative records and statistical techniques to complete the enumeration. Do you now anticipate any changes in the number of households that will -
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison Hayward Office of Congressional Ethics 425 3rd Street, SW Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20024 Dear Chairman Skaggs and Co-Chairwoman Hayward: We write to request that the Office of Congressional Ethics (“OCE”) investigate whether Representative Devin Nunes is receiving free legal services in violation of the Rules of the House of Representatives (“House rules”). Specifically, Representative Nunes retained an attorney who represents him in several defamation lawsuits in various courts where he seeks a total of nearly $1 billion in damages. House rules prohibit a Member from receiving free legal services, unless the Member establishes a Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”). According to the House Legislative Resource Center, Representative Nunes has not filed any of the required reports to establish an LEF. The relevant facts detailed below establish that the OCE Board should authorize an investigation of Representative Nunes. Representative Nunes’s overt involvement with the highly-publicized lawsuits threatens to establish a precedent that the Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”) regulations no longer apply to Members. Although Representative Nunes is entitled to legal representation and he may pursue any legal action to protect and defend his interests, he must comply with House rules. An OCE investigation will preserve Representative Nunes’s legal right to counsel while upholding well-established House rules and precedent. House Rules Prohibit Members from Receiving Discounted or Free Legal Services A Member of the House of Representatives “may not knowingly accept a gift” with limited exceptions.1 A “gift” is defined to include “a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. -
Sam Oh, [email protected] CA-39 NEWS
View this email in your browser FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Sam Oh, [email protected] CA-39 NEWS: Young Kim Raises Nearly $490K In Last FEC Quarter of 2019 Kim Q4 Fundraising Numbers Near the Top of House Challengers Across the Country Fullerton, CA – Today, the Young Kim for Congress campaign announced they raised nearly $490,000 in the Federal Election Commission’s 4th quarter to close out an impressive 2019. The significant haul puts her near the top of all House challengers across the country. The Young Kim for Congress campaign also reported ending the year with nearly $900,000 cash-on-hand and raising over $1.3 million in just 8 months in 2019. As Kim builds the war chest she needs to defeat Gil Cisneros, she also rolled out numerous key national and local endorsements in the final three months of 2019. Kim’s strong campaign infrastructure has attracted notice from the NRCC and the DCCC, who both have California’s 39th District as a key battleground seat in the fight for the House majority. “There is a reason Young is posting strong fundraising numbers and attracting endorsements from all across the country - she is a hardworking and dynamic candidate who is incredibly qualified and has everything it will take to win back this seat,” stated Sam Oh, general consultant to the Kim campaign. “Gil Cisneros has spent his first year in D.C. in lock step with Nancy Pelosi and his constituents are fed up.” Young has close to 200 federal and local leaders supporting her candidacy and also has been endorsed by the California, Orange County, Los Angeles County, and San Bernardino County Republican Parties. -
Hit- Alyse Galvin Has Taken Fourteen-Thousand Dollars In
Hit- Alyse Galvin has taken fourteen-thousand dollars in campaign contributions from Nancy Pelosi and her Leadership PAC, even after Galvin promised Alaskans she would not support Pelosi as Speaker. Backup: In 2018, Galvin Promised Not To Support Pelosi For Speaker: • During The 2018 Campaign, Galvin Said She Would Not Support Pelosi For Speaker And Said She Wanted “New Leadership.” “Galvin won the Democratic primary for the right to face off against the 23-term incumbent but identifies as an independent. Should she win and come to Washington, Galvin says she will caucus with Democrats, much like Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Angus King of Maine, but will remain unaffiliated. Her campaign made clear she will not be supporting House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for speaker and instead wants ‘new leadership.’” (Margaret Kriz Hobson, “Political Novice Has Sights On Don Young,” E&E News, 10/5/18) However, During The 2020 Campaign Cycle, Galvin Has Since Received $14,000 In Contributions From Pelosi: Editor’s Note: PAC To The Future is Nancy Pelosi’s Leadership PAC, according to the Center For Responsive Politics. • On June 26, 2020, Nancy Pelosi For Congress Contributed $4,000 To Galvin’s Campaign. (Alyse For Congress, Federal Election Commission, Accessed 09/10/20) • On June 26, 2020, Nancy Pelosi’s PAC, PAC To The Future Contributed $10,000 To Galvin’s Campaign. (Alyse For Congress, Federal Election Commission, Accessed 09/10/20) • PAC To The Future is Nancy Pelosi’s Leadership PAC, according to Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. (Full PAC List, Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Accessed 09/10/20) . -
167 Representatives on FY 07 Animal Welfare Funding Letter
167 Representatives on FY 07 Animal Welfare Funding Letter Arizona Hawaii Missouri Pennsylvania Rep. Raul Grijalva (D) Rep. Ed Case (D) Rep. Russ Carnahan (D) Rep. Robert Brady (D) Rep. Ed Pastor (D) Rep. William Lacy Clay (D) Rep. Mike Doyle (D) Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D) Rep. Phil English (R) Illinois Rep. Chaka Fattah (D) Arkansas Rep. Judy Biggert (R) Rep. Vic Snyder (D) Rep. Jerry Costello (D) Nevada Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R) Rep. Danny Davis (D) Rep. Shelley Berkley (D) Rep. Jim Gerlach (R) Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D) Rep. Todd Platts (R) California Rep. Lane Evans (D) Rep. Allyson Schwartz (D) Rep. Howard Berman (D) New Hampshire Rep. Curt Weldon (R) Rep. Mary Bono (R) Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D) Rep. Charles Bass (R) Rep. Lois Capps (D) Rep. Dan Lipinski (D) Rep. Bobby Rush (D) Rhode Island Rep. Susan Davis (D) New Jersey Rep. Anna Eshoo (D) Rep. Janice Schakowsky (D) Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D) Rep. John Shimkus (R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D) Rep. James Langevin (D) Rep. Sam Farr (D)* Rep. Jerry Weller (R) Rep. Mike Ferguson (R) Rep. Bob Filner (D) Rep. Rush Holt (D) Rep. Elton Gallegly (R) Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R) South Carolina Rep. Michael Honda (D) Indiana Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D) Rep. James Clyburn (D) Rep. Tom Lantos (D) Rep. Dan Burton (R) Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D) Rep. John Spratt (D) Rep. Barbara Lee (D) Rep. Julia Carson (D) Rep. Joe Wilson (R) Rep. Donald Payne (D) Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D) Rep. Jim Saxton (R) Rep. Doris Matsui (D) Iowa Rep. Christopher Smith (R) South Dakota Rep. -
Afterschool Programs: Bureaucratic Barriers and Strategies for Success Effective Strategies of the Key Players
S C H O O L Strengthening the vital alliance between school board & superintendent Afterschool Programs: Bureaucratic Barriers and Strategies for Success Effective Strategies of the Key Players Why Afterschool? Where What Can You Are the Go for Barriers? Help? S traight talk By Paul D. Houston Afterschool Programs: A Historic Opportunity To Serve All Children in Yo ur District School leaders can no longer see their responsibil- consistently participate in quality afterschool ity as merely a 9 to 3 issue. What happens to children activities over a period of time have better after school has a direct impact on how they learn and grades, greater student engagement in school, grow. This issue of School Governance & Leadership increased homework completion, reduced is about afterschool programs — a powerful tool that absenteeism, less tardiness, greater parent has not been fully tapped in our efforts to guarantee involvement, lower truancy rates, increased civic children not just access to school, but success through engagement and reduced crime and violence in high achievement. This document is a companion piece the non-school hours. to the May 2005 issue of TheSchool Administrator, which focused on afterschool programs, making it AASA has been an advocate of quality afterschool clear that afterschool programs are worth the effort. programs since the early 1990s, when we collaborated As Terry Peterson, national afterschool advocate and with schools across the country to develop and sup- former counselor to Secretary of Education Richard port afterschool programs for young adolescents facing Riley, asks, in light of the hard financial times faced by multiple challenges to school and life success. -
Washington Update
WASHINGTON UPDATE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER Vol 5 No 3 Published by the AUSA Institute of Land Warfare March 1993 PRESIDENT CLINTON'S ECONOMIC PLAN, ASPIN'S $10.8 BILLION BUDGET CUT hits the announced Feb. 17, calls for defense spending cuts of Army to the tune of $2.5 billion. The Army reportedly $127 billion in budget authority by 1997 from the pro met the Defense Secretary's Feb. 2 order to cut that posal of former President Bush. Details of just where the amount from a $64.1 billion proposed FY 1994 budget cuts will come must wait until release of the Clinton FY by offering to cancel a number of major weapons now in 1994 Defense budget-expected around the end of production or development and by accelerating the draw March. All that is known to date is that the President down of troops from Europe. How many of these will plans a 1.4 million active-duty force (vice Bush's 1.6 make it through the budget process is pure speculation at million); cuts the U.S. force in Europe to about 100,000, this point. The specific reductions won't be known until (Bush projected 150,000); freezes the SDI program at President Clinton sends his FY 1994 budget to Capitol $3.8 billion a year, (Bush saw $6.3 billion request for FY Hill (expected late March), but "Pentagon officials" have 1994 alone); and imposes a freeze on federal pay in commented in the media that the Army proposes to cut: creases in 1994 and limited raises thereafter.