Chairman Devin Nunes Biography Ranking Member Adam Schiff
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Board Packet February 6, 2020 Meeting of February 6, 2020 FOR: INFORMATION
Tulare Joint Union High School District Board Packet February 6, 2020 Meeting of February 6, 2020 FOR: INFORMATION TULARE JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECEIVE: Quarterly Board Policy Revisions Background: The Administration reviews CSBA’s recommended amendments for board policies on a quarterly basis to ensure that the District is in compliance with State and Federal regulations. Current Considerations: The Administration is recommending revisions to Board Policies per CSBA’s recommendations. Attached is the CSBA Policy Guide Sheet to summarize the revisions. The wording on the revised policies has been shaded to indicate revisions. If the policy is new to the District, it will state it as “NEW”. The following Board Policies are being presented for your review: BP 1112 Media Relations [Orisio] BP 3551 Food Service Operations/Cafeteria Fund [Hamilton] BP 5136 Gangs [Aldaco] BP 6142.2 World Language Instruction [Van Scyoc] BP 6145.6 International Exchange [Van Scyoc] BP 6174 Education for English Learners [Van Scyoc] BP 6179 Supplemental Instruction [Van Scyoc] BB 9321 Closed Session [Rodriguez] Fiscal Implications: There are no fiscal implications associated with these revisions. Tulare Joint Union High School District Board Priorities: Improve Student Outcomes and Performance Manage Facilities and Student Growth Maintain the Fiscal Integrity of the District and Fund the Board’s Priorities Staff the TJUHSD with Qualified Personnel and Maintain a Positive Work Environment Maintain Safe Schools Continue to Strengthen Internal and External Communication Systems SUBMITTED BY: Mr. Tony Rodriguez Prepared By: Tony Rodriguez, Superintendent POLICY GUIDE SHEET July 2019 Page 1 of 3 Note: Descriptions below identify revisions made to CSBA's sample board policies, administrative regulations, board bylaws, and/or exhibits. -
Impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States: Report of the Comm
IN THE SENATEOF THEUNITED STATES Sitting as a Court of Impeachment Inre IMPEACHMENTOF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF THEUNITEDSTATES HOUSEOF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE IMPEACHMENTTRIALOF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP United States House of Representatives AdamB.Schiff JerroldNadler Zoe Lofgren HakeemS.Jeffries Val ButlerDemings Jason Crow Sylvia R.Garcia U.S. House of RepresentativesManagers TABLEOF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................................9 I. C ONSTITUTIONALG ROUNDSFORP RESIDENTIALI MPEACHMENT....................................................9 II. THE HOUSE’SIMPEACHMENTOF PRESIDENTDONALDJ. TRUMPANDPRESENTATIONOF T HISM ATTERTO THE S ENATE..............................................................................................................12 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................................16 I. T HE S ENATES HOULDC ONVICT P RESIDENTT RUMPOF A BUSEOF P OWER..................................16 A. PresidentTrumpExercisedHis OfficialPowerto PressureUkraineintoAidingHis Reelection....................................................................................................................................16 B. PresidentTrumpExercisedOfficialPowerto -
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison Hayward Office of Congressional Ethics 425 3rd Street, SW Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20024 Dear Chairman Skaggs and Co-Chairwoman Hayward: We write to request that the Office of Congressional Ethics (“OCE”) investigate whether Representative Devin Nunes is receiving free legal services in violation of the Rules of the House of Representatives (“House rules”). Specifically, Representative Nunes retained an attorney who represents him in several defamation lawsuits in various courts where he seeks a total of nearly $1 billion in damages. House rules prohibit a Member from receiving free legal services, unless the Member establishes a Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”). According to the House Legislative Resource Center, Representative Nunes has not filed any of the required reports to establish an LEF. The relevant facts detailed below establish that the OCE Board should authorize an investigation of Representative Nunes. Representative Nunes’s overt involvement with the highly-publicized lawsuits threatens to establish a precedent that the Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”) regulations no longer apply to Members. Although Representative Nunes is entitled to legal representation and he may pursue any legal action to protect and defend his interests, he must comply with House rules. An OCE investigation will preserve Representative Nunes’s legal right to counsel while upholding well-established House rules and precedent. House Rules Prohibit Members from Receiving Discounted or Free Legal Services A Member of the House of Representatives “may not knowingly accept a gift” with limited exceptions.1 A “gift” is defined to include “a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. -
2017 Political Contributions (January 1 – June 30)
2017 Political Contributions (January 1 – June 30) Amgen is committed to serving patients by transforming the promise of science and biotechnology into therapies that have the power to restore health or even save lives. Amgen recognizes the importance of sound public policy in achieving this goal, and, accordingly, participates in the political process and supports those candidates, committees, and other organizations who work to advance healthcare innovation and improve patient access. Amgen participates in the political process by making direct corporate contributions as well as contributions through its employee-funded Political Action Committee (“Amgen PAC”). In some states, corporate contributions to candidates for state or local elected offices are permissible, while in other states and at the federal level, political contributions are only made through the Amgen PAC. Under certain circumstances, Amgen may lawfully contribute to other political committees and political organizations, including political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, and Section 527 organizations. Amgen also participates in ballot initiatives and referenda at the state and local level. Amgen is committed to complying with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations that govern such contributions. The list below contains information about political contributions for the first half of 2017 by Amgen and the Amgen PAC. It includes contributions to candidate committees, political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, Section 527 organizations, and state and local ballot initiatives and referenda. These contributions are categorized by state, political party (if applicable), political office (where applicable), recipient, contributor (Amgen Inc. or Amgen PAC) and amount. Office Candidate State Party Office Committee/PAC Name Candidate Name Corp. -
Evaluating Federal Gang Bills
December 2008 SPECIAL REPORT Analysis from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency Evaluating Federal Gang Bills Linh Vuong Fabiana Silva Introduction The Gang Abatement and Prevention Act of 2007 (S. Sen. Feinstein’s and Rep. Schiff ’s legislation respond to 456) was introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein in January, an assumed rise in gang violence. The bills’ provisions 2007, and subsequently passed the following October. call for suppression-heavy strategies, increasing pun- Its companion bill, the Gang Prevention, Intervention, ishments for gang crimes, and expanding the types of and Suppression Act (H.R. 3547), sponsored by Rep. crimes that can be categorized as such. Years of research Adam Schiff, has been introduced in the House. The and evaluation have shown that these types of suppres- bills expand the current penal code regarding criminal sion strategies are not the solution to the gang problem. street gangs, resulting in an over-reaching de nition of Yet, these bills propose more than $1 billion in dupli- both gangs and gang-related crimes. Additionally, they cative suppression, prosecution, and incarceration of create an entirely new section of penalties pertaining to “gangs” and “gang members,” leaving little money for gang crimes, increasing the enhanced-sentences that are community-based prevention and intervention programs already in place. Both bills are referred to as the “Gang that have been proven to work. Rep. Schiff ’s bill has been Abatement Act” in this text. However, distinction will cosponsored by 25 fellow legislators. However, 8 have be made between the Senate and House versions when withdrawn their support due to concerns of dispro- they differ signi cantly. -
Fiscal 2018 Full Year Disclosures
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED DISCLOSURES UNDER POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES POLICY FISCAL YEAR 2018 (SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2018) (AMOUNTS PAID IN FISCAL YEAR 2018) STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS CALIFORNIA AMOUNT NONE $ - OTHER STATES AMOUNT NONE $ - FEDERAL PAC CONTRIBUTIONS (QPAC) AMOUNT ANGUS KING FOR US SENATE CAMPAIGN$ 2,500 BRIAN HIGGINS FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 CLARKE FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 COMSTOCK FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 COMSTOCK FOR CONGRESS $ 2,500 DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$ 5,000 DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$ 5,000 DEVIN NUNES CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$ 1,000 DR. RAUL RUIZ FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 ENGEL FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 FEINSTEIN FOR SENATE 2018 $ 2,500 FRIENDS OF ELIZABETH ESTY $ 1,000 FRIENDS OF RAJA FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 GEORGE HOLDING FOR CONGRESS INC.$ 1,000 HELLER FOR SENATE $ 1,500 JOSH GOTTHEIMER FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 LANCE FOR CONGRESS $ 1,500 LATTA FOR CONGRESS $ 1,500 LOFGREN FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 MAKING BUSINESS EXCEL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$ 1,000 MARINO FOR CONGRESS $ 2,500 MCCARTHY VICTORY FUND $ 2,500 MCCAUL FOR CONGRESS, INC $ 2,500 MCCONNELL FOR MAJORITY LEADER COMMITTEE$ 5,000 MCMORRIS RODGERS AMERICAN DREAM PROJECT; THE$ 2,000 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE$ 5,000 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE$ 5,000 NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE AKA NDC PAC$ 5,000 ORRINPAC $ 5,000 PETE AGUILAR FOR CONGRESS $ 2,500 PETE SESSIONS FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 RICHARD E NEAL FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE$ 1,000 ROSKAM FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $ 1,000 SAVE AMERICA -
Leadership PAC $6000 Byrne for Congress Rep. Bradley
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. PAC 2020 Cycle Contributions Name Candidate Office Total ALABAMA American Security PAC Rep. Mike Rogers (R) Leadership PAC $6,000 Byrne for Congress Rep. Bradley Byrne (R) Congressional District 1 $2,000 Defend America PAC Sen. Richard Shelby (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 Doug Jones for Senate Committee Sen. Doug Jones (D) United States Senate $5,000 Martha Roby for Congress Rep. Martha Roby (R) Congressional District 2 $3,000 Mike Rogers for Congress Rep. Mike Rogers (R) Congressional District 3 $11,000 Robert Aderholt for Congress Rep. Robert Aderholt (R) Congressional District 4 $3,500 Terri Sewell for Congress Rep. Terri Sewell (D) Congressional District 7 $10,000 Together Everyone Realizes Real Impact Rep. Terri Sewell (D) Leadership PAC $5,000 (TERRI) PAC ALASKA Alaskans For Dan Sullivan Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) United States Senate $5,000 Lisa Murkowski For US Senate Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) United States Senate $5,000 ARIZONA David Schweikert for Congress Rep. David Schweikert (R) Congressional District 6 $2,500 Gallego for Arizona Rep. Ruben Gallego (D) Congressional District 7 $3,000 Kirkpatrick for Congress Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Congressional District 2 $7,000 McSally for Senate, Inc Sen. Martha McSally (R) United States Senate $10,000 Sinema for Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D) United States Senate $5,000 Stanton for Congress Rep. Greg Stanton (D) Congressional District 9 $8,000 Thunderbolt PAC Sen. Martha McSally (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 ARKANSAS Crawford for Congress Rep. Rick Crawford (R) Congressional District 1 $2,500 Womack for Congress Committee Rep. Steve Womack (R) Congressional District 3 $3,500 CALIFORNIA United for a Strong America Rep. -
Select and Special Committees of the House
SELECT AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence HVC–304 The Capitol, phone 225–4121 [Created pursuant to H. Res. 658, 95th Congress] Mike Rogers, of Michigan, Chair Mac Thornberry, of Texas. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, of Maryland. Sue Wilkins Myrick, of North Carolina. Mike Thompson, of California. Jeff Miller, of Florida. Janice D. Schakowsky, of Illinois. K. Michael Conaway, of Texas. James R. Langevin, of Rhode Island. Peter T. King, of New York. Adam B. Schiff, of California. Frank A. LoBiondo, of New Jersey. Dan Boren, of Oklahoma. Devin Nunes, of California. Luis V. Gutierrez, of Illinois. Lynn A. Westmoreland, of Georgia. Ben Chandler, of Kentucky. Michele Bachmann, of Minnesota. Thomas J. Rooney, of Florida. Joseph J. Heck, of Nevada. SUBCOMMITTEES [The Speaker and Minority Leader are ex officio (non-voting) members of the committee.] Terrorism, Human Intelligence, Analysis, and Counterintelligence Sue Wilkins Myrick, of North Carolina, Chair K. Michael Conaway, of Texas. Mike Thompson, of California. Peter T. King, of New York. Dan Boren, of Oklahoma. Frank A. LoBiondo, of New Jersey. Luis V. Gutierrez, of Illinois. Thomas J. Rooney, of Florida. Technical and Tactical Intelligence Joseph J. Heck, of Nevada, Chair Mac Thornberry, of Texas. Adam B. Schiff, of California. Frank A. LoBiondo, of New Jersey. James R. Langevin, of Rhode Island. Devin Nunes, of California. Ben Chandler, of Kentucky. Michele Bachmann, of Minnesota. Oversight and Investigations Lynn A. Westmoreland, of Georgia, Chair Jeff Miller, of Florida. Janice D. Schakowsky, of Illinois. Devin Nunes, of California. Mike Thompson, of California. Michele Bachmann, of Minnesota. -
2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio
2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio Name Amount Democrat Alabama Sen. Doug Jones (D) $2,500 41% California Rep. Amerish Bera (D) $2,000 59% Rep. Devin Nunes (R) $2,000 Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D) $1,000 Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R) $5,000 Republican Rep. Linda Sanchez (D) $2,000 Rep. Mark Takano (D) $1,000 Rep. Raul Ruiz (D) $2,500 Name Amount Rep. Scott Peters (D) $1,000 Sen. Joyce Krawsiec (R) $1,000 Rep. Ted Lieu (D) $500 Rep. Graig Meyer (D) $500 Delaware Sen. Jim Perry (D) $500 Sen. Christopher Coons (D) $1,000 Rep. Larry Potts (R) $500 Rep. Robert Reives (D) $500 Florida Sen. Gladys Robinson (D) $500 Rep. Greg Steube (R) $1,000 Rep. Wayne Sasser (R) $500 Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D) $2,000 Sen. Mike Woodard (D) $500 Georgia Rep. Mark Meadows (R) $1,000 Rep. Douglas Collins (R) $2,500 Rep. Richard Hudson (R) $5,000 Sen. Thom Tillis (R) $4,000 Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) $500 North Dakota Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R) $500 Illinois Rep. Brad Schneider (D) $4,000 Nebraska Rep. Cheri Bustos (D) $2,500 Rep. Adrian Smith (R) $2,500 Rep. Darin LaHood (R) $2,500 Nevada Rep. Mike Bost (R) $2,000 Sen. Jacky Rosen (D) $1,000 Rep. Mike Quigley (D) $1,000 Rep. Robin Kelly (D) $1,000 New Hampshire Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R) $1,000 Rep. Ann McClane Kuster (D) $2,000 Rep. S. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) $1,000 New York Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) $1,000 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R) $2,000 Sen. -
IN the SENATE of the UNITED STATES Sitting As a Court of Impeachment in Re IMPEACHMENT of PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TRIAL MEMORA
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES Sitting as a Court of Impeachment In re IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP United States House of Representatives Adam B. Schiff Jerrold Nadler Zoe Lofgren Hakeem S. Jeffries Val Butler Demings Jason Crow Sylvia R. Garcia U.S. House of Representatives Managers TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 9 I. CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS FOR PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT .................................................... 9 II. THE HOUSE’S IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP AND PRESENTATION OF THIS MATTER TO THE SENATE .............................................................................................................. 12 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 16 I. THE SENATE SHOULD CONVICT PRESIDENT TRUMP OF ABUSE OF POWER .................................. 16 A. President Trump Exercised His Official Power to Pressure Ukraine into Aiding His Reelection ................................................................................................................................... -
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Gj2020111968168and Applicationof The
Case 1:20-sc-03082-BAH Document 3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 16 UNITEDSTATESDISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA ) SC NO. 1:20-sc-03082 GJ2020111968168AND APPLICATIONOF ) THE UNITEDSTATESOF AMERICAFOR ) AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ) Filed Under Seal § 2705(B) ) ) ) Twitter Account: @NunesAlt ) ) TWITTER, INC.’S MOTIONTO QUASH SUBPOENA AND VACATE NONDISCLOSUREORDERAND MEMORANDUMINSUPPORT INTRODUCTION The government has issued a subpoena (the “Subpoena”) for “[a]ll customer or subscriber account information” for the Twitter user @NunesAlt (the “Account”) from October 1, 2020 to present. Under the First Amendment, the government cannot compel Twitter to produce information related to the Account unless it “can show a compelling interest in the sought-after material and a sufficient nexusbetween the subject matter of the investigation and the information it seek[s].” Inre Grand Jury Subpoena No. 11116275,846 F. Supp. 2d 1, 4 (D.D.C.2012)(internal quotation marksomitted).While Twitter does not have visibility into the purpose of the Subpoena, Twitter has serious concerns whether the government can meet this standard given the context in which it has received the Subpoena. It appears to Twitter that the Subpoena may be related to Congressman Devin Nunes’s repeated efforts to unmask individuals behind parody accounts critical of him. His efforts to suppress critical speech are as well-publicized as they are unsuccessful.He recently sued Twitter, attempting to hold it liable for speech by the parody Twitter accounts @DevinCow, @DevinNunesMom,@fireDevinNunes,and @DevinGrapes, and asking the court in that case to Case 1:20-sc-03082-BAH Document 3 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 16 order Twitter to disclose information identifying those accounts. -
May 20, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House H-232
May 20, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House H-232, US Capitol Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Steny H. Hoyer Majority Leader of the House H-107, US Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Hoyer, As Congress considers actions regarding strategic competition with China, we write to urge you to move any such legislation through the House of Representatives under a process of regular order, and that we do not waste this opportunity to develop strong and thoughtful policy by shoehorning it through using reconciliation. As Ranking Members of the Committees engaged in this work, we believe it is vital that any such legislation be developed in a bipartisan, bicameral, open, and transparent process. Addressing the generational threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue – it is an American issue. We stand ready to work with you and the chairs of our Committees to hold the CCP accountable for its actions, while also bolstering our own global leadership in innovation, including investing in American research and development, shoring up domestic supply chains, improving coordination with strategic allies, and addressing other security issues. We are pleased to see that the Senate is working to confront the CCP’s threats to the critical nexus we have identified between American technological competitiveness, economic growth, and national security. While we may not agree on all of the policies currently under consideration in the Senate, we appreciate that there is widespread recognition of the dangers we face from Communist leadership in China, and a willingness to take action.