U ILLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

PRODUCTION NOTE

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Population status of the Illinois chorus

(Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis)

in Madison County, Illinois: Results of 2001 surveys

IDOT CONTRACT 1-5-90179

FINAL REPORT ON 2001 RESULTS

John K. Tucker

Center for Aquatic Ecology

Illinois Natural History Survey

Great Rivers Field Station

8450 Montclaire Avenue

Brighton, Illinois 62012

January 2002

I J. K. Tucker

Principal Investigator

Center for Aquatic Ecology

Illinois Natural History Survey

DISCLAIMER

The findings, conclusions, and views expressed herein are those of the researchers and should not be considered as the official position of the Illinois Department of Transportation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUPPORT

This research (contract number 1-5-90179) was funded by the

Illinois Department of Transportation.

ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A study of the biology of the Illinois , Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis, is reported. Surveys of Madison County for choruses of the located nine choruses in 2001. Eight of these choruses were located at the same sites that choruses were found in

2000. One new site was found where frogs were calling in 2001. The bulk of the study was conducted using drift fences at the wetland mitigation area adjacent to Sand Road in Sec. 19, T4N, R8W. The primary purpose of the 2001 study was to examine spatial variation in use of the mitigation area by the Illinois chorus frog and to estimate population size and density at the mitigation area. I estimated population size using recaptures of frogs previously marked. Lincoln-Petersen index estimate of population size based on recaptures of previously marked frogs was about 70 frogs for both sexes. This estimate is about one- sixth of the 1999 estimate possibly due to unfavorable recruitment in

2000. The apparent reduction in frog numbers was not due to activities associated with wetland restoration. However, had the wetland project not been completed the frog populations may have been even more adversely impacted by the drying of the wetland area. I found the first evidence of surface activity among adult frogs outside of the breeding season. A single frog was collected in September of 1998 suggesting that monitoring of drift fences year-round is important.

iii TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title and Signature page

DISCLAIMER ...... ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUPPORT...... ,....,.. S..ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... ,...... iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... °,, S.iv

LIST OF TABLES...... ° S... v

LIST OF FIGURES ...... ,•, ..vi

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...... •...... vii

INTRODUCTION......

CHORUS LOCATIONS IN THE SAND ROAD STUDY AREA ...... 2

Materials and Methods ...... •o.•... ..2

Results and Discussion...... °•., . .2

POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATES...... , .. 4

Materials and Methods ...... •...... 4

Results and Discussion...... ,....

SUMMARY ...... ,... . .6

LITERATURE CITED ...... 7

iv LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: All Illinois chorus frogs collected between 1996 and 2001.....5 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Sand Road study area showing the location of the wetland mitigation area and known choruses of the Illinois chorus frog

(Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis)...... 3

vi Figure 1

Scale = 0.8 km North

Levee road

Rose historical site

-1 Wanda Rd trailer park 1 Old Poag Road krea enlarged (10CU Streetcar Road CO, Sand prairie chorus (U) below SandRoad - I

Hartzell Rd

Greenhouse p-- Sand Road > ! _i ______

Chain of Rocks Road ------

North t =Chorus

Sand Streetcar Road Road Morris historical site Trailer park Brockmeier chorus Site colonized Greenhous e in 2001 Greenh. < -Hartzell Rd Mitigation area -!j

Sand Idle Acres chorus Road

Scale = 0.8 km ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank G. B. Rose, M. M. Tucker, and D. Warner for field

assistance. L. E. Brown provided many useful suggestions concerning the biology of the frog and helped with literature needs. G. E. Kruse provided permits necessary for this project.

vii INTRODUCTION

The Illinois chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis, is restricted to the floodplains of the Mississippi and Illinois rivers in

Arkansas, Illinois, and Missouri (Conant and Collins, 1991). The frog is listed as a threatened species in Illinois (Herkert, 1992), as a rare species in Missouri (Anonymous, 1992), as a species of special concern in Arkansas (R. Roberg, pers. comm.), and as federal C-2 species (Dodd et al., 1985).

This highly fossorial frog occurs in Illinois mainly along the central part of the Illinois River (Smith, 1951, 1961, 1966; Morris and

Smith, 1981; Taubert et al., 1982; Brown and Rose, 1988; Morris, 1990;

Beltz, 1991 and 1993). Other populations are, also, scattered along the

Mississippi River from Madison to Alexander Counties, Illinois (Holman et al., 1964; Brown and Brown, 1973; Axtell and Haskell, 1977; Morris and Smith, 1981; Taubert et al., 1982; Gilbert, 1986; Brown and Rose,

1988; Morris, 1990; Beltz, 1991 and 1993; Tucker and Philipp, 1993;

1994; 1995; 1996).

Several previous publications and unpublished reports provide details on the life history of P. s. illinoensis including information on underground feeding behavior (Brown, 1978), burrowing behavior

(Axtell and Haskell, 1977; Brown et al., 1972; Tucker et al., 1995;

Tucker, 1995), chorus sites (Brown and Rose, 1988; Tucker, 1998), fecundity (Butterfield et al., 1989; Tucker and Philipp, 1995; Tucker,

1997a), post-metamorphic growth (Tucker, 1995; Tucker and Philipp,

1995), morphology of newly transformed froglets (Tucker, 1997b); food habits (Tucker, 1997c), thermobiology (Packard et al.. 1998), and morphological adaptations to fossorial existence (Brown and Means, 1984;

Paukstis and Brown, 1987 and 1991). The present report is a summary of

results for 2001 and a continuation of studies initiated in 1993.

This year's activities carried forward objectives from previous

years and include an analysis of the impact of the wetland mitigation

area. My objectives were:

1. Monitor the distribution of P. s. illinoensis choruses in

appropriate habitat in the impact area.

2. Estimate the approximate number of P. s. illinoensis located on the

wetland mitigation area.

CHORUS LOCATIONS IN THE SAND ROAD STUDY AREA

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monitoring of chorus locations in the Sand Road study area (Fig. 1)

began on February 16, 2001. The methods used and sites visited were

reviewed in previous reports (i.e., Tucker and Philipp, 1996).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In 2001, a total of nine choruses were located (Fig. 1). Eight of these

locations were sites of choruses in previous years. One new chorus site

was found in 2001 (Fig. 1). Figure 1. Sand Road study area showing the location of the wetland mitigation area and known choruses of the Illinois chorus frog

(Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison County, Illinois. Figure 1

Scale = 0.8 km North

Levee road • ee\ Rose historical site ,A

SWanda Rd trailer park -ci Old Poag Road Area enlarge e d ct~ Sand praiirie chorus I Streetcar Road (I) _ _ _ __ below SandRoad ---

<- .----- Hartzell Rd

Greenhouse

Sand Road I / I I Chain of Rocks Road'

North = Chorus

Sand Streetcar Road Road Morris historical site ,A. Trailer park - - Brockmeier chorus

Site colonized -i __Genu in 2001 Greenhouse '-Hartzell Rd Mitigation area

Sand Idle Acres chorus Road AD

Scale = 0.8 km Generally, chorus sites have been stable in the general study area from 1994-2000 with no indication of recolonization of distant sites where this species is thought to have been extirpated (Tucker and

Philipp, 1995; Tucker, 1998). This year's results marked a departure from previous years results with the discovery of a new chorus site.

This site occupies a borrow pit created in 1997-1998. The borrow pit is located just south of Streetcar Road and just north of the wetland mitigation site. Likely frogs that colonized this site came from the wetland mitigation area.

POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATES

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Population size estimate was made using the Petersen method as modified by Bailey (1951) for estimates of population size when number of recaptures were small (Donnelly and Guyer, 1994). Standard error of was not calculated due to the small number of captures in 2000 and 2001.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Petersen estimate of population size was 70 total frogs based on recaptures of previously marked frogs (Table 1). The 2001 estimate was only one-sixth of the estimate made in 1997 of about 455 adults (the highest population recorded). Apparently, unfavorable rainfall in the summer and fall of 2000 reduced recruitment in this species.

This conclusion is supported by the few captures made in 2000 and

2001 compared to previous years (Table 1). Nonetheless, the number of frogs cought in 2001 was 6 times higher than the few frogs caught in

2000. This suggests that recruitment from year to year is important in maintaining populations sizes (Tucker, 1995; 1998). Table 1. Number of Illinois chorus frogs caught from 1996 to 2001.

Total number

Year of frogs males females

1996 60 31 29

1997 86 47 39

1998 22 13 9

1999 151 78 73

2000 2 0 2

2001 12 5 7 Summary

The restored wetland actually became available for the frogs to use in

1998. Coincidentally, 1997 was a severe drought year and the number of

frogs caught in the following year (1998) was reduced by one-quarter in that compared to previous years. Despite this reduction, captures in

1999 were the highest ever made. These capture rates are not affected by collecting effort because the same drift fences have been used in all years of the study since 1996.

The 2000 year represents the lowest capture rate for any year of the study at the wetland mitigation area. Despite this extremely low capture rate, some frogs were added to the population. Although 2000 was an extremely dry spring, the wetland retained water throughout the breeding season. The few frogs that did breed in 2000 were able to add to the number caught in 2001.

The question that remains to be determined is "how successful is the wetland mitigation project in maintaining the Illinois chorus frog

in Madison County?". This question cannot be fully answered at this time. However, frogs survived the driest spring recorded to date in

2000 and added some frogs in 2001. Moreover, and probably more

important, a new chorus location was recorded in 2001. Sufficient

froglets must have been produced in 1999 and even in the drought year

2000 to colonize this new chorus. Thus early indications are that the

wetland project is accomplishing the goals set for it so far as the

population status of the Illinois chorus frog is concerned. LITERATURE CITED

Anonymous. 1992. Rare and endangered species of Missouri Checklist.

Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 43 pp.

Axtell, R. W. and N. Haskell. 1977. An interhiatal population of

Pseudacris streckeri from Illinois, with an assessment of its

postglacial history. Chicago Acad. Sci. Nat. Hist. Misc. 202:1-8.

Bailey, N. T. J. 1951. On estimating the size of mobile populations from

recapture data. Biometrica 38:293-306.

Beltz, E. 1991. Illinois chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri

illinoensis, 1991 survey of Cass, Menard, Morgan, and Scott

Counites, Illinois. Unpublished report to Illinois Dept.

Conservation, Division of Natural Heritage, Springfield, Illinois.

18 pp.

Beltz, E. 1993. Distribution and status of the Illinois chorus frog,

Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis, in Cass, Menard, Morgan, and

Scott Counties of west-central Illinois. Unpublished report to

Illinois Dept. Conservation, Division of Natural Heritage,

Springfield, Illinois. 17 pp.

Brown, L. E. 1978. Subterranean feeding by the chorus frog Pseudacris

streckeri (Anura: ). Herpetologica 34:212-216.

Brown, L. E. and J. R. Brown. 1973. Notes on breeding choruses of two

anurans (Scaphiopus holbrooki, Pseudacris streckeri) in southern

Illinois. Chicago Acad. Sci. Nat. Hist. Misc. 192:1-3.

Brown, L. E., H. O. Jackson, and J. R. Brown. 1972. Burrowing behavior

of the chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri. Herpetologica 28:325-

328. Brown, L. E., and D. B. Means. 1984. Fossorial behavior and ecology of

the chorus frog Pseudacris ornata. Amphibia-Reptilia 5:261-273.

Brown, L. E. and G. B. Rose. 1988. Distribution, habitat, and calling

season of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri

illinoensis) along the lower Illinois River. Ill. Nat. Hist.

Surv. Biol. Notes 132:1-13.

Butterfield, B. P., W. E. Meshaka, and S. E. Trauth. 1989. Fecundity

and egg mass size of the Illinois chorus frog, Pseudacris

streckeri illinoensis (Hylidae), from northeastern Arkansas.

Southwest. Nat. 34:556-557.

Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1991. A Field Guide to Reptiles and

Amphibians [of] Eastern and Central North America, Third edition.

Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. 450 pp.

Dodd, C. K., Jr., G. E. Drewry, R. N. Nowak, J. M. Sheppard, and J. D.

Williams. 1985. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants;

review of vertebrate wildlife; notice of review. Part III. U. S.

Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildlife Serv. Federal Register

50:37958-37967.

Donnelly, M. A., and C. Guyer. 1994. Mark-recapture. In Heyer, W. R., M.

A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L.-A. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster

(eds.), Measuring and monitoring biological diversity standard

methods for , pp. 183-200. Smithsonian Institution

Press, Washington, D.C.

Gilbert, H. R. 1986. Geographic distribution: Pseudacris streckeri

illinoensis (Illinois chorus frog). Herpetol. Rev. 17:65. Herkert, J. R. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois:

Status and distribution. Volume 2 - . Illinois Endangered

Species Protection Board, Springfield. 142 pp.

Holman, J. A., H. 0. Jackson, and H. W. Hill. 1964. Pseudacris

streckeri illinoensis from extreme southern Illinois.

Herpetologica 20:205.

Morris, M. A. 1990. Ranges of amphibians and reptiles, pp. 52-77 in R.

A. Brandon. Herpetology laboratory notebook. Kopies and More:

Carbondale, II.

Morris, M. A. and P. W. Smith. 1981. Endangered and threatened

amphibians and reptiles, pp. 21-33 in M. L. Bowles, V. E.

Diersing, J. E. Ebinger, and H. C. Schultz, eds. Endangered and

threatened vertebrate animals and vascular plants of Illinois.

Illinois Dept. of Conservation: Springfield.

Packard, G. C., J. K. Tucker, and L. D. Lohmiller. 1998. Distribution

of Strecker's chorus frogs (Pseudacris streckeri) in relation to

their tolerance for freezing. Journal of Herpetology 32:437-440.

Paukstis, G. L., and L. E. Brown. 1987. Evolution of the intercalary

cartilage in chorus frogs, genus Pseudacris (Salientia: Hylidae).

Brimleyana 13:55-61.

Paukstis, G. L., and L. E. Brown. 1991. Evolutionary trends in the

morphology of the intercalary phalanx of anuran amphibians. Can.

J. Zool. 69:1297-1301.

Smith, P. W. 1951. A new frog and a new turtle from the western

Illinois sand prairies. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 9:189-199. Smith, P. W. 1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Ill. Nat.

Hist. Surv. Bull. 28:1-298.

Smith, P. W. 1966. Pseudacris streckeri. Cat. Am. Amphibians Reptiles

27.1-27.2.

Taubert, D. B., P. W. Shetley, D. P. Philipp, and T. Harrison. 1982.

Breeding biology and distribution of the Illinois chorus frog

(Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Illinois. Illinois Dept. of

Conservation: Springfield. 163 pp.

Tucker, J. K. 1995. Early post-transformational growth in the Illinois

chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis). J. Herpetol.

29:314-316.

Tucker, J. K. 1997a. Fecundity in the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris

streckeri illinoensis) from Madison County, Illinois. Trans.

Illinois Acad. Sci. 90:167-170.

Tucker, J. K. 1997b. Description of newly transformed froglets of the

Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis). Trans.

Illinois Acad. Sci. 90:161-166.

Tucker, J. K. 1997c. Food habits of the fossorial frog Pseudacris

streckeri illinoensis. Herpetol. Nat. Hist. 2:83-87.

Tucker, J. K. 1998. Status of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris

streckeri illinoensis) in Madison County, Illinois pp. 94-101 In

M. J. Lannoo (ed.), Status and Conservation of Midwestern

Amphibians, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.

Tucker, J. K., and D. P. Philipp. 1993. Population status of the

Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison

County, Illinois, with emphasis on the New Poag Road/FAP 413

10 interchange and FAP 413 wetland mitigation site. Unpublished

report to Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield,

Illinois. 31 pp.

Tucker, J. K., and D. P. Philipp. 1994. Population status of the

Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison

County, Illinois: Results of 1994 surveys. Unpublished report to

Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Illinois. 69

pp.

Tucker, J. K., and D. P. Philipp. 1995. Population status of the

Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison

County, Illinois: Results of 1995 surveys. Unpublished report to

Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Illinois. 12

pp.

Tucker, J. K., and D. P. Philipp. 1996. Population status of the

Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison

County, Illinois: Results of 1996 surveys. Unpublished report to

Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Illinois. 45

pp.

Tucker, J. K., J. B. Camerer, and J. B. Hatcher. 1995. Natural history

note: Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis (Illinois Chorus Frog)

Burrows. Herpetol. Rev. 26:32-33.

11