DOCSLIB.ORG

The Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan & Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan & Strategy State of Illinois Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor Department of Natural Resources Joel Brunsvold, Director THE ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY VERSION 1.0 AS PRESCRIBED BY THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION & RESTORATION PROGRAM AND STATE WILDLIFE GRANTS PROGRAM ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY Version 1.0 i. Partners in Plan/Strategy Development The Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan & Strategy was made possible with the help of these partners in conservation: ABATE of Illinois, Inc. Environmental Law & Policy Center Black Diamond Chapter Field Trial Clubs of Illinois American Bird Conservancy Fishing Buddies Association of Illinois Soil & Water Forest Preserve District of DuPage County Conservation Districts Forest Preserve District of Kane County Audubon Chicago Region Forest Preserve District of Will County Bird Conservation Network Friends of Johnson Park Boone County Conservation District Grand Prairie Friends Brookfield Zoo Henson Robinson Zoo Calhoun County Farm Bureau Illinois Association of Conservation Districts Central Hardwoods Joint Venture Illinois Association of REALTORS Central Illinois Musky Hunters Illinois Association of Regional Councils Champaign County Forest Preserve District Illinois Association of Resource Chicago Botanic Garden Conservation and Development Areas Chicago Wilderness Illinois Audubon Society Cook County Forest Preserve District Illinois Conservation Foundation Cosley Zoo Illinois Department of Agriculture D.J. Case & Associates Division of Natural Resources Defenders of Wildlife Illinois Department of Transportation Ducks Unlimited Design & Environment DuPage River Fly Tyers Planning & Programming Eastern Illinois University Illinois Department of Natural Resources Department of Biological Sciences C2000 Ecosystems Program Educational Resources for Environmental Endangered Species Task Group Sciences Illinois Natural History Survey Embarras Volunteer Stewards Office of Land Management & Environmental Education Association of Education Illinois Office of Law Enforcement -i- ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY Version 1.0 i. Partners in Plan/Strategy Development Illinois Department of Natural Resources National Wild Turkey Federation Office of Realty & Environmental Illinois Chapter Planning Northern Illinois Anglers Association Office of Resource Conservation Northern Illinois Conservation Club Private Lands Task Group Organization of Wildlife Planners Illinois Endangered Species Protection Partners in Flight Board Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Pheasants Forever Illinois Farm Bureau Prairie Rivers Network Illinois Federation for Outdoor Resources Quail Unlimited Illinois Forestry Development Council Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Program Sand Bluff Bird Observatory Illinois Nature Preserves Commission Shawnee Audubon Society Illinois State Museum Sierra Club Illinois State University Illinois Chapter Department of Biological Sciences Northwest Cook County Group International Association of Fish & Wildlife Shawnee Group Agencies Southern Illinois University Izaak Walton League Cooperative Wildlife Research Illinois Division Laboratory Champaign County Chapter Southwestern Illinois RC & D Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation The Natural Lands Institute Kankakee County Soil & Water The Nature Conservancy Conservation District The Ornithological Council Lake County Forest Preserve District The Wildlife Society Lincoln Park Zoo Illinois Chapter Little John Conservation Club Tri-County Regional Planning Commission Macon County Conservation District Trout Unlimited McHenry County Conservation District Illinois Council Union County Farm Bureau United Bowhunters of Illinois -ii- ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY Version 1.0 i. Partners in Plan/Strategy Development University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign US Fish & Wildlife Service Department of Natural Resources & Region 3 Development Assistance Environmental Sciences Team Urbana Park District Chicago Field Office Upper Des Plaines River Ecosystem Illinois River National Fish & Wildlife Partnership Refuges Complex Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Mark Twain National Fish & Wildlife Joint Venture Refuges Complex US Army Corps of Engineers National Acceptance Advisory Team Rock Island District Rock Island Field Office St. Louis District Upper Mississippi River National US Department of Agriculture Fish & Wildlife Refuges Complex Farm Service Agency Western Illinois University Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie Department of Biological Sciences Natural Resources Conservation Whiteside County Soil and Water Service Conservation District Shawnee National Forest Will County Forest Preserve District Winnebago County Forest Preserve District Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Special Thanks to the C2000 Ecosystem Partnerships EMBARRAS RIVER AMERICAN BOTTOM FOX RIVER BIG RIVERS HEADWATERS CACHE RIVER HEART OF THE SANGAMON CARLYLE LAKE RIVER DRIFTLESS AREA ILLINOIS RIVER BLUFFS DUPAGE RIVER COALITION KANKAKEE RIVER -iii- ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY Version 1.0 i. Partners in Plan/Strategy Development C2000 Ecosystem Partnerships PRAIRIE PARKLANDS KASKASKIA RIVER/SHOAL CREEK ROCK RIVER KINKAID AREA WATERSHED SALINE BASIN KISHWAUKEE RIVER SHAWNEE WATERSHED LAKE CALUMET SPOON RIVER LA MOINE RIVER SUGAR-PECATONICA RIVERS LOWER DES PLAINES RIVER THORN CREEK MACROSITE LOWER KASKASKIA/SILVER UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER CREEK UPPER KASKASKIA RIVER LOWER ROCK RIVER UPPER LITTLE WABASH LOWER SANGAMON VALLEY UPPER ROCK RIVER MACKINAW RIVER UPPER SALT CREEK OF THE MISSISSIPPI WESTERN FIVE SANGAMON NORTH BRANCH OF THE VERMILION RIVER CHICAGO RIVER VERMILION WATERSHED TASK OZARK FORCE -iv- ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY Version 1.0 ii. Acknowledgments ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan & Strategy (Plan/Strategy) has been made possible by tremendous cooperation and collaboration among many agencies, organizations and individuals. All of the agencies and organizations participating in the planning process are acknowledged on the previous pages. A number of excellent conservation plans were consulted and incorporated into this document (Table 3). The Plan/Strategy steering committee provided helpful guidance to the process (Table 2). Special thanks to the scientists who contributed to status assessments, objectives, and natural division assessments. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service was most helpful in guiding development of the Plan/Strategy, and the International Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies provided much- appreciated support to Illinois and the other states. Though the Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan & Strategy documents much work needs to be done, the accomplishments of yesterday’s and today’s conservationists provide an excellent foundation for the future. Thanks to the Teaming With Wildlife Coalition, the Wildlife Conservation & Restoration Program and State Wildlife Grants Program are providing additional support to habitat and wildlife conservation. Development of the Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan & Strategy was supported by State Wildlife Grant Program funding (Federal Aid Project T-2-P-1). -v- ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN & STRATEGY Version 1.0 iii. Foreword FOREWORD Illinois' Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan is a truly historic effort; never before has such a detailed, science-based plan for conserving our state's wildlife been undertaken. This process stretched over several months, and involved professional wildlife biologists, and also a knowledgeable steering committee representing several non-governmental wildlife and conservation organizations. In addition, the draft plan was presented at a number of regional meetings open to other interested groups and the general public, and was available to all on the Illinois Department of Natural Resources website. Wildlife and habitat data from public and private sources were evaluated and incorporated into the evolving plan. Most importantly, the final plan presented here is one which involves action. It is not just an inventory of species, but a plan to address the particular needs of wildlife that are declining so that populations can be stabilized and then increased. Many conservation projects in the past have been opportunistic and lacked a true sense of direction that could be plotted, tracked and designated as successful. Long-range landscape-level planning is one important component that leads to successful recovery efforts like those exemplified by wild turkeys and waterfowl. The Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan is a way to make habitat management and land protection targeted at ecosystems as exciting and successful as the aforementioned restoration efforts. It will guide future conservation efforts by outlining specific areas where limited dollars can be targeted to make positive impacts that are measurable. At the same time, all those entities with a vested interest in conservation--who have been part of the planning process--can work together more effectively in achieving the wildlife habitat goals which have been identified. The strategies outlined herein will focus future action by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and many not-for-profit organizations which are involved in saving, restoring and managing wildlife habitat.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Insect-Plant Pollination Networks for a Midwest Installation: Fort Mccoy, WI 5B
    1 - 16 - ERDC TN ERDC Center for the Advancement of Sustainability Innovations (CASI) Identification of Insect-Plant Pollination Networks for a Midwest Installation Fort McCoy, WI Irene E. MacAllister, Jinelle H. Sperry, and Pamela Bailey April 2016 Results of an insect pollinators bipartite mutualistic network analysis. Construction Engineering Construction Laboratory Research Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) solves the nation’s toughest engineering and environmental challenges. ERDC develops innovative solutions in civil and military engineering, geospatial sciences, water resources, and environmental sciences for the Army, the Department of Defense, civilian agencies, and our nation’s public good. Find out more at www.erdc.usace.army.mil. To search for other technical reports published by ERDC, visit the ERDC online library at http://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/default. Center for the Advancement of ERDC TN-16-1 Sustainability Innovations (CASI) April 2016 Identification of Insect-Plant Pollination Networks for a Midwest Installation Fort McCoy, WI Irene E. MacAllister and Jinelle H. Sperry U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 2902 Newmark Dr. Champaign, IL 61822 Pamela Bailey U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory (EL) 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Final Report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Under Center for the Advancement of Sustainability Innovations (CASI) Program Monitored by U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (ERDC-CERL) 2902 Newmark Drive Champaign, IL 61822 ERDC TN-16-1 ii Abstract Pollinating insects and pollinator dependent plants are critical compo- nents of functioning ecosystems yet, for many U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Member Benefits Reciprocity
    Additional Member Benefits Columbus Member Advantage Offer Ends: December 31, 2017 unless otherwise noted As a Columbus Zoo and Aquarium member, you can now enjoy you can now enjoy Buy One, Get One Free admission to select Columbus museums and attractions through the Columbus Member Advantage program. No coupon is necessary. Simply show your valid Columbus Zoo membership card each time you visit! Columbus Member Advantage partners for 2017 include: Columbus Museum of Art COSI Franklin Park Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Ohio History Center & Ohio Village Wexner Center for the Arts Important Terms & Restrictions: Receive up to two free general admissions of equal or lesser value per visit when purchasing two regular-priced general admission tickets. Tickets must be purchased from the admissions area of the facility you are visiting. Cannot be combined with other discounts or offers. Not valid on prior purchases. No rain checks or refunds. Some restrictions may apply. Offer expires December 31, 2017 unless otherwise noted. Fun Foto + Columbus Zoo members are invited to become a Fun Foto + member. Have your picture taken by any of our roaming photographers and get all your photos taken during the in 2017 season digitally for $34.99! Nationwide Insurance As a Zoo member, you can save on your auto insurance with a special member-only discount from Nationwide. Find out how much you can save today by clicking here. Reciprocity Columbus Zoo Members Columbus Zoo members receive discounted or FREE admission to the AZA accredited Zoos in the list below. Columbus Zoo members must present their current membership card along with a photo ID for each adult listed on the membership to receive their discount.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 19 May 7, 2010 Pages 6270-6557
    Volume 34,Issue 19 May 7, 2010 Pages 6270-6557 i TABLE OF CONTENTS May 7, 2010 Volume 34, Issue 19 PROPOSED RULES NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF Raccoon, Opossum, Striped Skunk, Red Fox, Gray Fox, Coyote and Woodchuck (Groundhog) Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 550....................................................................6270 Muskrat, Mink, Raccoon, Opossum, Striped Skunk, Weasel, Red Fox, Gray Fox, Coyote, Badger, Beaver and Woodchuck (Groundhog) Trapping 17 Ill. Adm. Code 570....................................................................6282 Dove Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 730....................................................................6293 Crow, Woodcock, Snipe, Rail and Teal Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 740....................................................................6310 Crossbow and Standing Vehicle Hunting Authorizations 17 Ill. Adm. Code 760....................................................................6324 Illinois List of Endangered and Threatened Fauna 17 Ill. Adm. Code 1010..................................................................6328 REVENUE, DEPARTMENT OF Income Tax 86 Ill. Adm. Code 100....................................................................6339 ADOPTED RULES CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF Reports of Child Abuse and Neglect 89 Ill. Adm. Code 300....................................................................6373 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF Sport Fishing Regulations for the Waters of Illinois 17 Ill. Adm. Code 810....................................................................6391
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Reciprocal List
    RECIPRICAL ZOOS. Each zoo sets their own guidelines for the quantity and ages admitted per card. Zoos can revoke privileges at any time without notice. RECIP 2006 STATE ZOO 50% CANADA Riverview Park & Zoo 50% CANADA Toronto Zoo 50% CANADA Valley Zoo 50% Alabama Birmingham Zoo NO Alabama Montgomery Zoo NO Arizona Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum NO Arizona Navajo Nation Zoo & Botanical Park 50% Arizona Phoenix Zoo 50% Arizona Reid Park Zoo NO Arizona Wildlife World Zoo 50% Arkansas Little Rock Zoo NO BE Bermuda Aquarium, Museum & Zoo NO BR Vancouver Aquarium NO California Academy Of Sciences 50% California Applegate Park Zoo 50% California Aquarium Of The Bay NO California Aquarium Of The Pacific NO California Birch Aquarium At Scripps 50% California Cabrillo Marine Aquarium 50% California Chaffee Zoo 50% California Charles Paddock Zoo 50% California Coyote Point Museum 50% California Happy Hollow Park & Zoo NO California Living Desert 50% California Los Angeles Zoo 50% California Micke Grove Zoo NO California Monterey Bay Aquarium 50% California Moonridge Zoo 50% California Oakland Zoo 50% California Orange County Zoo 50% California Sacramento Zoo NO California Safari West NO California San Diego Wild Animal Park NO California San Diego Zoo 50% California San Francisco Zoo 50% California Santa Ana Zoo 50% California Santa Barbara Zoo NO California Seaworld San Diego 50% California Sequoia Park Zoo NO California Six Flags Marine World NO California Steinhart Aquarium NO CANADA Calgary Zoo 50% Colorado Butterfly Pavilion NO Colorado Cheyenne
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the New World Species of Donacaula Meyrick and a Phylogenetic Analysis of Related Schoenobiinae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2010 A Revision Of The New World Species Of Donacaula Meyrick And A Phylogenetic Analysis Of Related Schoenobiinae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Edda Lis Martinez Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Martinez, Edda Lis, "A Revision Of The New World Species Of Donacaula Meyrick And A Phylogenetic Analysis Of Related Schoenobiinae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)" (2010). Theses and Dissertations. 248. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/248 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD SPECIES OF DONACAULA MEYRICK AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF RELATED SCHOENOBIINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) By Edda Lis Martínez A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology in the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Mississippi State, Mississippi December 2010 A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD SPECIES OF DONACAULA MEYRICK AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF RELATED SCHOENOBIINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) By Edda Lis Martínez Approved: ______________________________ ______________________________ Richard
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Falcons of Coles County, Illinois 14
    MeadowlarkSUMMER/FALL 2017 Prairie Falcons of Coles County, Illinois 14 2017 IORC Report 7 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Field Notes 21 Field Notes 46 Meadowlark PRESIDENT’S LETTER PUBLISHED BY Illinois Ornithological Society Anyone who has done a bit of bird watching on the western shore of Lake Michigan during fall migration knows that your success is very often weather EDITORIAL TEAM dependent. In fact, the best weather days (think sunny and calm) aren’t necessarily the best birding days at all. Warm sunny weather entices more people outside CHIEF EDITOR often with their kids and pets in tow. Better get up early or you’ll hear stories Eric Secker from fellow birders how dogs chased off a flock of graceful American Avocets from ASSISTANT EDITORS the beach or runners flushed an unexpected Upland Sandpiper moments before Tamima Itani, Adam Sell you arrived. There’s nothing more frustrating than missing a good bird by a few PRESIDENT & CHIEF SUPERVISOR minutes. Believe me. I’ve been there many times. Matt Igleski Experienced birders don’t mind getting up early or even braving the elements, LAYOUT AND PRODUCTION but it’s not just about trying to beat the crowd. Knowing how the weather may Eric Secker affect migration and bird activity improves your chances at finding certain species or of having a productive outing in general. FIELD NOTES EDITORS There’s probably one condition where you might as well pack it in for the Jill Anderson Matt Hayes day and that’s heavy rain. In a torrential downpour, you won’t be able to see or Dan Williams even keep your optics dry.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Different Mowing Regimes on Butterflies and Diurnal Moths on Road Verges A
    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 29.2 (2006) 133 Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges A. Valtonen, K. Saarinen & J. Jantunen Valtonen, A., Saarinen, K. & Jantunen, J., 2006. Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 29.2: 133–148. Abstract Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges.— In northern and central Europe road verges offer alternative habitats for declining plant and invertebrate species of semi– natural grasslands. The quality of road verges as habitats depends on several factors, of which the mowing regime is one of the easiest to modify. In this study we compared the Lepidoptera communities on road verges that underwent three different mowing regimes regarding the timing and intensity of mowing; mowing in mid–summer, mowing in late summer, and partial mowing (a narrow strip next to the road). A total of 12,174 individuals and 107 species of Lepidoptera were recorded. The mid–summer mown verges had lower species richness and abundance of butterflies and lower species richness and diversity of diurnal moths compared to the late summer and partially mown verges. By delaying the annual mowing until late summer or promoting mosaic–like mowing regimes, such as partial mowing, the quality of road verges as habitats for butterflies and diurnal moths can be improved. Key words: Mowing management, Road verge, Butterfly, Diurnal moth, Alternative habitat, Mowing intensity. Resumen Efecto de los distintos regímenes de siega de los márgenes de las carreteras sobre las polillas diurnas y las mariposas.— En Europa central y septentrional los márgenes de las carreteras constituyen hábitats alternativos para especies de invertebrados y plantas de los prados semi–naturales cuyas poblaciones se están reduciendo.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]