DOCSLIB.ORG

Ni 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report on the Pine Point Zinc Project, Northwest Territories, Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ni 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report on the Pine Point Zinc Project, Northwest Territories, Canada DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES LTD. PINE POINT PEA NI 43-101 PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE PINE POINT ZINC PROJECT, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, CANADA Prepared for: Qualified Persons Company Garett Macdonald, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. Kelly McLeod, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES LTD. Dino Pilotto, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. Suite 400, 365 Bay Street Ken Embree, P.Eng. Knight Piésold Ltd. Toronto, ON, M5H 2V1 Albert Daniel Siega, P.Eng Independent Consultant Paul Gann, P.Geo Independent Consultant Prepared by: JDS ENERGY & MINING INC. Suite 900, 999 W Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2W2 EffectiveEFFECTIVE Date D: AprilATE :18, A 2017PRIL 18, 2017 i REPORT DATE: JUNE 1, 2017 DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES LTD. PINE POINT PEA NOTICE JDS Energy & Mining, Inc. prepared this National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report, in accordance with Form 43-101F1, for Darnley Bay Resources Ltd. The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is based on: (i) information available at the time of preparation; (ii) data supplied by outside sources, and (iii) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. Darnley Bay Resources Ltd. filed this Technical Report with the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities pursuant to provincial securities legislation. Except for the purposes legislated under provincial securities law, any other use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. Effective Date: April 18, 2017 ii DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES LTD. PINE POINT PEA Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................ iii Tables and Figures ....................................................................................................... ix 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Description and Location ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Access and Ownership .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.4 History, Exploration and Drilling ................................................................................................. 1-2 1.5 Geology & Mineralization ........................................................................................................... 1-3 1.6 Metallurgical Testing and Mineral Processing ........................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Mineral Resource Estimates ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.8 Mineral Reserve Estimate .......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.9 Mining ......................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.10 Recovery Methods ................................................................................................................... 1-10 1.11 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 1-10 1.12 Environment and Permitting ..................................................................................................... 1-11 1.13 Capital Cost Estimate ............................................................................................................... 1-12 1.14 Operating Cost Estimate .......................................................................................................... 1-13 1.15 Economic Analysis ................................................................................................................... 1-14 1.15.1 Main Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 1-14 1.15.2 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 1-16 1.15.3 Sensitivities .............................................................................................................................. 1-16 1.16 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 1-17 1.16.1 Risks ......................................................................................................................................... 1-17 1.16.2 Opportunities ............................................................................................................................ 1-18 1.17 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 1-18 2 Introduction ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Basis of Technical Report .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Qualifications and Responsibilities ............................................................................................ 2-2 2.4 Site Visit ..................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.5 Units, Currency and Rounding ................................................................................................... 2-3 2.6 Sources of Information ............................................................................................................... 2-3 3 Reliance on Other Experts ........................................................................... 3-1 4 Property Description and Location ............................................................. 4-1 4.1 Area of the Property ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Location of the Property ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Type and Details of Mineral Tenure ........................................................................................... 4-2 4.4 Issuer’s Title To and Interest in the Property ............................................................................. 4-2 4.4.1 Surface Rights ............................................................................................................................ 4-2 4.4.2 Obligations for Retention of Property ......................................................................................... 4-3 4.4.3 Expiration Date of Claims, License, or Other Property Tenure Rights ...................................... 4-3 Effective Date: April 18, 2017 iii DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES LTD. PINE POINT PEA 4.5 Agreements and Encumbrances ................................................................................................ 4-3 4.5.1 Environmental Liabilities ............................................................................................................ 4-3 4.6 Permitting ................................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.6.1 Land and Environmental Permits ............................................................................................... 4-3 4.7 Other Factors and Risks ............................................................................................................ 4-4 5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Topography, Elevation, and Vegetation ..................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Physiography.............................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 Vegetation and Wildlife .............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Means of Access to the Property ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Proximity to Population Centers ................................................................................................. 5-2 5.3.1 Climate ....................................................................................................................................... 5-2 5.4 Infrastructure .............................................................................................................................. 5-2 5.4.1 Exploration and Operating Season ............................................................................................ 5-3 6 History ............................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Early History ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacinnabar Hgs C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Metacinnabar HgS c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Cubic. Point Group: 43m. Commonly massive; rarely as small (to 1 mm) tetrahedral crystals having rough faces. Twinning: Common on {111}, forming lamellae in polished section. Physical Properties: Fracture: Subconchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3 VHN = n.d. D(meas.) = 7.65 D(calc.) = 7.63 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Grayish black; in polished section, grayish white. Streak: Black. Luster: Metallic. Pleochroism: Weak, rarely. Anisotropism: Very weak, rarely. R: (400) 28.4, (420) 27.6, (440) 26.8, (460) 26.3, (480) 25.9, (500) 25.6, (520) 25.4, (540) 25.2, (560) 25.1, (580) 25.0, (600) 24.9, (620) 24.9, (640) 24.8, (660) 24.7, (680) 24.7, (700) 24.7 Cell Data: Space Group: F 43m. a = 5.8717(5) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 3.378 (100), 2.068 (55), 1.7644 (45), 2.926 (35), 1.3424 (12), 1.6891 (10), 1.3085 (10) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (4) Hg 79.73 67.45 81.33 86.22 Zn 4.23 3.10 Cd 11.72 Fe trace 0.2 Se 1.08 6.49 S 14.58 15.63 10.30 13.78 Total 99.62 98.10 98.12 100.00 (1) Guadalc´azar,Mexico; corresponds to (Hg0.85Zn0.14)Σ=0.99(S0.97Se0.03)Σ=1.00. (2) Uland area, Russia; corresponds to (Hg0.69Cd0.21Zn0.10Fe0.01)Σ=1.01S1.00. (3) San Onofre, Mexico; corresponds to Hg1.00(S0.80Se0.20)Σ=1.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Research in the Northwest Territories 2014
    Compendium of Research in the Northwest Territories 2014 www.nwtresearch.com This publication is a collaboration between the Aurora Research Institute, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre. Thank you to all who submitted a summary of research or photographs, and helped make this publication possible. Editor: Ashley Mercer Copyright © 2015 ISSN: 1205-3910 Printed by Aurora Research Institute Foreword Welcome to the 2014 Compendium of Research in the Northwest Territories. This year marked a special anniversary for the Aurora Research Institute and northern research. Fifty years ago, the Inuvik Research Laboratory was built and has served as a hub for research in the western arctic ever since. The Lab, as it was known, was first built as an initiative of the Canadian federal government in the newly established community of Inuvik. It remains on the same site today, but in 2011, a new modern multi-purpose facility opened to continue to support research in the north. We have included a brief history of the Lab and its impact in this edition of the Compendium to mark its long lasting importance to many researchers and community members. As part of the 50th anniversary celebration, the Aurora Research Institute team undertook a full set of NWT-wide celebrations. We celebrated the history, capacity and growth of research in the NWT that touched all corners of the territory and beyond. We honoured the significant scientific contributions that have taken place in the NWT over the past 50 years, and the role of NWT researchers, technicians and citizens in these accomplishments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores
    A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment 2 cm Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus marcasite) from the Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and Scientificsphalerite Investigations alnong colloform Report layers of2010–5070–A light-colored spahlerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerire and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 cm. Photo by David Leach. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus mar- casite) from Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and sphalerite along colloform layers of light-colored sphalerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerite and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 centimeters. (Photograph by David L. Leach, U.S. Geological Survey.) A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley- Type Lead-Zinc Ores By David L. Leach, Ryan D. Taylor, David L. Fey, Sharon F. Diehl, and Richard W. Saltus Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Information on Fish Stocks and Harvests in the South Slave Area, Northwest Territories
    A Review of Information on Fish Stocks and Harvests in the South Slave Area, Northwest Territories DFO L b ary / MPO Bibliotheque 1 1 11 0801752111 1 1111 1 1 D.B. Stewart' Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 'Arctic Biological Consultants Box 68, St. Norbert Postal Station 95 Turnbull Drive Winnipeg, MB, R3V 1L5. 1999 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2493 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribution is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 1426-1550 were issued as Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrite's Evil Twin Marcasite and Pyrite Are Two Common Minerals. Both Fes2 Chemically, Making Them Polymorphs. Polym
    Marcasite - Pyrite's Evil Twin Marcasite and pyrite are two common minerals. Both FeS2 chemically, making them polymorphs. Polymorphs are minerals with the same chemical composition but different crystal structures. Diamond and graphite are polymorphs, both minerals being pure carbon. In diamond and graphite the different arrangement of carbon atoms gives these two minerals of very different physical properties. Pyrite and marcasite, on the other hand, have almost identical physical properties, making them tough to tell from each other. Let's go through their properties. Both are metallic and pale yellow to brassy yellow. Both can tarnish and be iridescent. Both are 6-6.5 on the Mohs' hardness scale. Neither have a particularly prominent cleavage, although marcasite does have one that occasionally shows up. Both have densities of about 5 grams per cubic centimeter (pyrite is a bit denser, but not enough to be detectible without delicate measurements). They can even be found together in the same rock. Fortunately these minerals often show good outer crystal shapes that are quite different. Pyrite crystals are generally equant, and dominated by cubes, octahedrons and 12-sided pyritohedrons. Marcasite crystals are usually rectangular (tabular) with wedge-shaped ends and tend to form in star shaped, radiating or cockscomb groups. Marcasite is also much more restricted in occurrence than pyrite, forming only in low temperature, near surface, very acidic environments. It is found in some ore deposits, in sediments formed under somewhat stagnant conditions and as ground water precipitates in rocks such as in limestone and shale. Although pyrite can also be found in many of these same environments, the crystal shapes are diagnostic.
    [Show full text]
  • OROGRAPHY 11 Just North of Edmonton a Height of Land Turns the Waters to Flow North Into the Great Mackenzie River, Over 2,500 M
    OROGRAPHY 11 Just north of Edmonton a height of land turns the waters to flow north into the great Mackenzie river, over 2,500 miles long, whose valley with its low elevation above the sea is the outstanding feature of the Northwest Territories. In this watershed the terrain becomes less smooth with prominent elevations in the Caribou, Horn, and Franklin mountains and the clay soils of the prairies give way to more of sand and gravel. Great Slave and Great Bear lakes, each half as large again as lake Ontario and less elevated above the sea than lake Erie, are notable features; north and east of these two great lakes the country comes within the Canadian Shield* and the rock with some shallow overburden slopes gently down to the Arctic ocean without any large uplifts to break the monotony. Going east again, in the more northerly part there is encountered the orographical influence of Hudson bay which, indenting the continent so deeply and with rivers running in from west, south, and east, has an enormous drainage basin mainly in Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. Practically all of this great basin, excepting the Nelson River drainage, is included in the Canadian Shield, the surface characteristic of which is hard rock either exposed or overlain with shallow soil generally confining agriculture to the valleys or small basins. With only small areas in northeastern Quebec rising above 2,000 feet in elevation, there are no great eminences, but the surface is generally accidented by many hills and hollows with countless numbers of lakes and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Ity of Minerais with the Pyrite, Marcasite
    STRUCTURALSTABI!.ITY OF MINERAISWITH THE PYRITE, MARCASITE,ARSENOPYRITE AND L6ILINGITESTRUCTURES ERNEST H. NICKEL M,ineral Sc'iencesD'i,v,is,ion, M,ines Branch, Departrnentof Energy, M.i,nesand, Resowrces, 6id Booth Street,Ottawa, Canad,a AssrRAcr The structural stabilities of the disulphides, diarsenides and sulpharsenides of iron, cobalt and nickel are explained on thi basis of ligand field theory. ihe structural stabilities can be correlated with the number of non-bonding d elecirons of the metal atom in the structure, and can.be explained by the tenden"yif th" .ornpourrd" to form structures in which maximum electron spin-pairing takes place. The pyrite,structure, which is favoured-by -!tub with six or more non-bonding d electrons, and which includes pyrite, cattierite, vaesite, cobaltite gur"aormt"i i, characterized by metal-sulphur oclahedra joined at corneis, with no apparintlnteraction""a between the d electrons of neighbouring metal atoms. The otiei structures are all characterized by shared octahedral edgesalong one direction, so that the metal atoms are brought into.relatively close proximlty. In-the marcasite structure, which includes marcasite and rammelsbergite, both with six non-bonding d electrons, the metal atoms repel each other because of completely filled tzs levek. In dre arsenopyrite structure, whichjncludes arsenopyrite and siffiorite, both oi which havefrve iJ eleciions that do noi participate.in metal-sulphur londing, pairs of metals are drawn together to permit spin- pairing of the odd electrons. In ldllingite, in which the iron atom islssumed io have iour non-bonding-d electrons, the d orbitals in.the a crystallographic direction are emptied, permitting close iron-iron approachesin this direciion, r"-wull as complete of the electrons in the two remaining ,2sorbitals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Mineral Deposits NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 2007 a Guide to Mineral Deposits
    A GUIDE TO MINERAL DEPOSITS NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 2007 A Guide to Mineral Deposits of the Northwest Territories Minerals, Oil and Gas Division Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment Government of the Northwest Territories November 2007 Edited by: Christy Campbell Published by: Minerals, Oil and Gas Division Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment Government of the Northwest Territories November 2007 Available from: Minerals, Oil and Gas Division Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment Government of the Northwest Territories 9th Floor, Scotia Centre 600, 5102-50th AVE YELLOWKNIFE NT X1A 3S8 www.iti.gov.nt.ca/mog/index.htm Cover Description: Photos courtesy of Diavik Diamond Mines Inc. and John Veevaert of Trinity Mineral Company. Note: This publication supersedes earlier editions of A Guide to Mineral Deposits of the Northwest Territories, published by Minerals, Oil and Gas Division, Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment, Government of the Northwest Territories. Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 GOLD PROPERTIES .................................................................................................................................. 4 Miramar Con Mine ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Miramar Giant Mine ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taltson Hydro Project NORTHWEST TERRITORIES POWER Northwest Territories Power Corporation CORPORATION Yellowknife, Northwest Territories
    Taltson Hydro Project NORTHWEST TERRITORIES POWER Northwest Territories Power Corporation CORPORATION Yellowknife, Northwest Territories Taltson Hydro Project Meteorology and Hydrology Compilation Data Report Prepared by: April 2001 Rescan™ Environmental Services Ltd. TM Yellowknife, Northwest Territories EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is a compilation of all available and relevant meteorology and hydrology data collected, recorded, and purchased throughout the life of the Taltson Hydro Project. The data are analyzed, summarized, and discussed in the main body of the report, while the raw data are available on the accompanying CD and the 1998 Hydat CD. The purpose of the report is to compile and summarize meteorology/hydrology data and to identify which components of the Project require further investigation in order to meet the goals of the Water Effects Monitoring Program (WEMP). The primary meteorological parameters used to characterize the Taltson Hydro Project are air temperature and precipitation, both of which have a direct influence on the operation of the Taltson Hydro Project. The nearest meteorological station with a long-term period of record is Fort Smith Airport. Meteorological data from Fort Smith Airport are considered representative for the Taltson area. Temperature and precipitation data from Fort Smith are summarized herein. All available hydrological data relevant to the WEMP are summarized. The majority of the data can be found in previous reports on the Taltson Hydro Project. The remaining data
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Waters of Opportunity
    Table of Contents Waters of Opportunity .................... 1 Barrenlands and Great Respect and Responsibility ............ 2 Bear Lake .......................................11 Licence to Thrill .............................. 3 Mackenzie River and the Delta ...... 12 Epic Waters .................................... 4 Beaufort Sea and Arctic Ocean ..... 13 By Land, Water or Air ..................... 5 Our Specialties .............................. 14 Seasoned Operators ...................... 7 Getting Here .................................. 20 What to Bring ................................. 8 Map ............................................... 21 NWT Geographic ........................... 9 Operator Listings ........................... 23 14 Our Specialties BRUGGEN VAN JASON Great Slave Lake ............................10 Cover Photo Credit: Jason Van Bruggen The metric system is used for all measurements in this guide. Following are conversions of the more common uses: 1 kilometre (km) = .62 miles 1 metre (m) = 39 inches 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds Indicates a member of Northwest Territories Tourism at the time of publication. The 2015 Sportfishing Guide is published by Northwest Territories DISCLAIMER – The information on services and licences Tourism, P.O. Box 610 Yellowknife NT X1A 2N5 Canada. contained in this book is intended for non-residents of the Toll free in North America 1-800-661-0788 Northwest Territories and non-resident aliens visiting Canada. Telephone (867) 873-5007 Fax (867) 873-4059 It is offered to you as a matter of interest and is believed Email: [email protected] Web: spectacularnwt.com to be correct and accurate at the time of printing. If you Production by Kellett Communications Inc., Yellowknife, would like to check the current licence status of a Northwest Northwest Territories. Printed in Canada for free distribution. Territories operator or to get an official copy of the NWT Fishing Regulations, please contact the Government of the Northwest Territories at (867) 873-7903.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowknife Geoscience Forum
    2016 Yellowknife Geoscience Forum Abstract and Summary Volume Cover photograph Mackenzie Mountains foothills, NWT; Viktor Terlaky, Senior Petroleum Geologist at the Northwest Territories Geological Survey The picture was taken near the Arctic Red River and shows river cuts and thaw slumps in the Peel Plateau area. Old meets new: the river cuts expose Devonian and Cretaceous strata, some of which are the target of investigation as potential unconventional hydrocarbon plays; thaw slumps are caused by permafrost melting and are interpreted to be the consequence of climate change. Compiled by D. Irwin, S.D. Gervais, and V. Terlaky Recommended Citation: Irwin, D., Gervais, S.D., and Terlaky, V. (compilers). 2016. 44th Annual Yellowknife Geoscience Forum Abstracts; Northwest Territories Geological Survey, Yellowknife, NT. YKGSF Abstracts Volume 2016. - TECHNICAL PROGRAM - 2016 YELLOWKNIFE GEOSCIENCE FORUM ABSTRACTS AND SUMMARIES Contents ordered by first author (presenting author in bold) Abstracts - Oral Presentations Qilalugaq Diamond Project, Nunavut – A Unique Locality for Rare ‘Canary’ Yellow Diamonds. Armstrong, K.A. ................................................................................................................................ 1 Insights into Gold Mineralization at the Yellowknife City Gold Project using Synchrotron X-Ray Spectroscopy. Banerjee, N.R., Van Loon, L.L., Gordon, S., Lu, L., Bajwa, C., Flynn, T., Sexton, A., Setterfield, T., Campbell, J., and Carpenter, R. ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]