Ashley Beairsto
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wells College Association of Alumnae and Alumni
WellsNotes Spring 2020 Wells College Alumnae and Alumni Newsletter Wells College Association of Alumnae and Alumni WCA TO HONOR TWO DISTINGUISHED ALUMNAE THIS MAY The Wells College Association of Alumnae and Alumni (WCA) is proud to announce the two recipients of the 2020 WCA Award: Gwen Wilkinson ’77 and Stephanie Batcheller ’79. Both alumnae have had distinguished careers in the field of law with a particular emphasis on public service: Gwen as a district attorney and social justice advocate, and Stephanie as a public defender and legal educator. GWEN WILKINSON ’77 STEPHANIE BATCHELLER ’79 The Wells College Association of Alumnae The Wells College Association of Alumnae and Alumni is honoring Gwen Wilkinson and Alumni is honoring Stephanie ’77 with the WCA Award in recognition Batcheller ’79 with the WCA Award for of her public service, especially in the her accomplishments in the field of law and prosecution of perpetrators of child abuse contributions to the justice system. and domestic violence and in addressing Stephanie, a career public defender who has other social justice issues. argued before courts in Georgia, Maryland Gwen established herself as a proactive, and New York, is a senior staff attorney with ethical and passionate advocate for social the New York State Defenders Association justice throughout her career as a prosecutor (NYSDA). Since 1998, she has been with the and social services attorney in Tompkins association’s nonprofit Public Defense Backup County, N.Y. Those same attributes define her work with community Center, where she serves as senior staff attorney, developing client- organizations, providing context for how her education at Wells framed centered representation training strategies for new public defense the passion and drive she is known for. -
Successful Communication in the Workplace 1
Successful Communication in the Workplace 1 Leslie Knope of Parks and Recreation: Successful Communication in the Workplace November 28, 2016 Leslie Knope 2 Introduction According to Genderlect Styles, a theory by Deborah Tannen, women traditionally communicate for relationship while men communicate for power. In order to work past oppression in the workplace, women have had to adjust their communication style to communicate for power vs. relationship, but often receive negative attention for it. Are male communication styles for power the only way to gain success in the workplace today? The television show, Parks and Recreation, shows a good example of a character, Leslie Knope, who exemplifies both types of communication: communicating for power and relationship. She takes a lot of time to invest in her friends and usually, as a comedic element of the series, wants everyone to like her and everyone to be happy, but this usually causes more harm than good. She learns throughout the series that her success comes from her care for her friends and her town while commanding power to stand out as a leader in order to rise in politics. Can success only be gained when we communicate for power instead of relationships? I will look to answer the question of how television series, films, and the media depict “successful” communication practices for women in the workplace by analyzing the character of Leslie Knope in Parks and Recreation. My literature review will discuss how the media portrays women, and what truth these depictions hold for women in the working world. Literature Review A large portion of research done on this topic discusses how prominent female roles in our media are scrutinized, and how positive female roles of women in power are generally underrepresented. -
Chesapeake Parks, Recreation and Tourism's Athletic Doctrine
CHESAPEAKE PARKS, RECREATION AND TOURISM’S ATHLETIC DOCTRINE I. TO PROMOTE SPORT PROGRAMS THAT ARE SAFE, FUN AND ENJOYABLE. Competition encourages cooperation, self-discipline, and motivation while enhancing the development of life-long traits. Remember, that competition is a process and not a product. The score is a product of competition. Therefore, our athletic leagues will strive towards the process instead of the product. II. TO PROMOTE PHYSICAL FITNESS THROUGH SPORTS. Exercise allows the body to develop in the manner for which it was designed. III. TO PROMOTE RESPECT OF ONE'S SELF AND OTHERS THROUGH GOOD SPORTSMANSHIP by emphasizing the development of cooperation and respectful behavior toward teammates, opponents, referees, and coaches. Also, coaches should help each child feel good about him/herself. IV. TO PROMOTE RESPONSIBILITY IN ONE'S SELF THROUGH ENCOURAGED PARTICIPATION and emphasizing that one's effort is more important than the final score. V. TO PROMOTE THE TEACHING SPORTS FUNDAMENTALS which are essential to enjoy the game. Coaches should develop each child's skills and abilities to the fullest potential. VI. TO PROMOTE SPORTS EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR ALL VOLUNTEER COACHES. Qualified adult leadership is necessary for positive growth and human development. NEW RULES ARE IDENTIFIABLE BY BOLD TYPE 2 GENERAL YOUTH RULES I. RECREATION LEAGUES A. General Purpose 1. To inspire the youth and adults of our city to take part in the programs sponsored by the City of Chesapeake Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department. 2. To bring the citizens closer together through a common interest in sportsmanship, fellowship, and athletic competition. 3. To encourage adults to set a good example when supervising the youth of our city, and to keep the welfare of youth foremost in mind. -
Berthoud Park and Recreation Policies and Procedures
Berthoud Park and Recreation Policies and Procedures The following Parks and Recreation Policies and Procedures are implemented to help the Parks and Recreation staff formulate a well-organized, fair and fun recreational environment for all to enjoy. 1. Registration will be open to the public for a one month period. 2. All activity registrations will be based on age with the exception of Youth Basketball, grades will be used. The age cutoff is the age of the participant on the first program start date. For leagues this would be the first possible practice date. For instructional programs, this will be the first date the program meets. 3. Documentation for proof of age and grade level may be requested at any time. 4. Deadlines will be strictly enforced to ensure management efficiency, safety and quality of the programs. 5. Space is limited! Not everyone is guaranteed a spot in the program so register early. 6. No team registrations! Parks and Recreation only accepts individual registrations on a first come first serve basis. 7. If there are not enough numbers for certain age groups, the recreation department may choose to combine age groups. Leagues may be combined based on a 2 year differential to ensure safety and quality of programs. 8. The Recreation Department cannot guarantee a program will run until registration has ended and participant levels have been determined. 9. Based on registration numbers, participants may not be able to participate in the program in which they are registered. 10. After the registration deadline, late registrations will be taken only if there are spots available. -
Historic Context Study of Waterfowl Hunting Camps and Related Properties Within Assateague Island National Seashore, Maryland and Virginia
Historic Context Study of Waterfowl Hunting Camps and Related Properties within Assateague Island National Seashore, Maryland and Virginia by Ralph E. Eshelman, Ph.D and Patricia A. Russell Eshelman & Associates July 21, 2004 For Assateague Island National Seashore National Park Service Department of Interior 7206 National Seashore Lane Berlin, Maryland 21811 i ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………. ii ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………..iii INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………..1 Project background Clubs and lodges Definitions Regional context WATERFOWL HUNTING ON THE ATLANTIC ………………………………..7 Delaware North to New York Maryland Virginia North Carolina South to Georgia Assateague Island WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUBS AND LODGES……………………………..21 Land-Based Facilities Water-Based Facilities TYPICAL DAY AT A WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUB……………………….31 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUBS AND LODGES………………………………………………… 33 Owners Members Guests: The Rich and Famous Gender Guides Food Thrill of the Hunt Fraternal Comradeship Ethnicity of Support Staff Role in Conservation ASSATEGUE ISLAND WATERFOWL HUNTING CAMPS AND LODGES…………………………………………………………………..47 ASSOCIATED PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ASSATEGUE ISLAND WATERFOWL HUNTING CLUBS AND LODGES………….49 iii INVENTORY OF RESOURCES…………………………………………………52 Bob-O-Del Gun Club Bunting’s Gunning Lodge Clements’ Beach House Clements’ Boat House Green Run Lodge High Winds Gun Club Hungerford’s Musser’s Peoples & Lynch Pope’s Island Gun Club Valentine’s CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………72 REFERENCES CITED……………………………………………………………76 APPENDIX I ANNOTATED LIST OF GUN CLUBS AND LODGES IN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA………………………………………90 APPENDIX II PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE OF CONTEXT STUDY TEAM………………………………………………99 APPENDIX III CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FIELD SURVEY…………………………………100 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project benefited from numerous persons who assisted us in countless ways, shared knowledge, and otherwise made this study possible. -
ABC KIDS/COMEDY Program Guide: Week 23 Index 1 | Page
ABC KIDS/COMEDY Program Guide: Week 23 Index 1 | P a g e ABC KIDS/COMEDY Program Guide: Week 23 Index Index Program Guide .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Sunday, 31 May 2020 ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Monday, 1 June 2020 ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Tuesday, 2 June 2020 .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Wednesday, 3 June 2020 .................................................................................................................................... 21 Thursday, 4 June 2020 ........................................................................................................................................ 27 Friday, 5 June 2020 ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Saturday, 6 June 2020 ......................................................................................................................................... 39 2 | P a g e ABC KIDS/COMEDY Program Guide: Week 23 Sunday 31 May 2020 Program Guide Sunday, 31 May 2020 5:00am The Hive (Repeat,G) 5:10am Pocoyo -
Città & Storia
Città & Storia Redazione/Editorial Board Corrispondenti Scientifici/Editorial Advisory Board SALVATORE ADORNO, Università di Catania MAURICE AYMARD, EHESS, Paris DONATELLA CALABI, editor, Università IUAV di Venezia ALFREDO BUCCARO, Università di Napoli Federico II CLAUDIA CONFORTI, Università di Roma «Tor Vergata» ALDO CASTELLANO, Politecnico di Torino FILIPPO DE PIERI, Politecnico di Torino JEAN-FRANÇOIS CHAUVARD, Université de Strasbourg ALBERTO GROHMANN, Università di Perugia EVA CHODěJOVSKÁ, Istituto di Storia dell’Accademia delle ALBERTO GUENZI, Università di Parma Scienze della Repubblica Ceca MARCO IULIANO, University of Liverpool, School of Architecture MATTHEW DAVIES, Centre for Metropolitan History, London PAOLA LANARO, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia DIRK DE MEYER, Ghent University KETI LELO, Università «Roma Tre» DAVID H. FRIEDMAN, MIT, Cambridge (Ma) BRIGITTE MARIN, Aix-Marseille Université BERNARD GAUTHIEZ, Université Lyon-III «Jean Moulin» LUCA MOCARELLI, Università di Milano «Bicocca» MAURIZIO GRIBAUDI, EHESS, Paris FRANCESC MUÑOZ, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona ENRICO IACHELLO, Università di Catania MARIA LUISA NERI, Università di Camerino DEREK KEENE, University of London CARLOS SAMBRICIO, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid RENÉE KISTEMAKER, Amsterdam Museum, GÁBOR SONKOLY, University of Budapest HIDENOBU JINNAI, Hosei University, Tokyo PETER STABEL, University of Antwerp MIGUEL ANGEL LADERO QUESADA, Univ. Complutense, Madrid IUSEPPE TEMPERINI G S , Università «Roma Tre» DANIELE MANACORDA, Università «Roma Tre» ONATELLA -
Grant Management 101: Be the Leslie Knope of Whatever Grant You Manage 2019 Grant Management Workshop | November 19-20, 2019
Grant Management 101: Be the Leslie Knope of Whatever Grant You Manage 2019 Grant Management Workshop | November 19-20, 2019 OUTCOME An increased understanding of the grant manager’s role and responsibilities. WHO IS LESLIE KNOPE? Leslie Knope is the Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation for the Town of Pawnee, IN. She is an organized and passionate public servant and a champion for projects that improve the quality of life for residents in her community. FRIENDS. WAFFLES. WORK. Grant Managers are responsible for a grant’s: Friends | People Waffles | Processes Work | Paperwork FRIENDS | PEOPLE Grant Managers are responsible for bringing all of the appropriate people together to ensure a project’s success. This requires knowing who needs to be at the table and what their responsibilities will be, facilitating project-related communication, and creating a collaborative space. WHO NEEDS TO BE INVITED TO THE TABLE? Project Management Team? Housing Rehab or Façade Board? Other Project “Friends”? Sparkplug/Project Area Rep Sparkplug/Project Area Rep Administrative Assistants Elected Official Elected Official Chief Administrative Officer Chief Administrative Officer Housing Authority Director or Financial Manager Downtown Association Director Project/Program Manager Property Owner Architect and/or Engineer Rehab Specialist Attorney Building Official Others: Others: 1 | Grant Management 101 WHAT ARE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES? Role Responsibilities Grant Manager Sparkplug/Project Area Rep Elected Official Chief Administrative Officer Financial Manager Project/Program Manager Architect and/or Engineer Attorney Housing Authority or Downtown Association Director Property Owner Rehab Specialist Building Official Others: When bringing folks together to work on a project, be mindful of their: • Schedules • Other Responsibilities • Relationships • Personalities • Expectations IMPORTANT REMINDERS “Connection before direction.” –Dr. -
Tulsa Parks and Recreation Master Plan Survey
Appendix: Open-Ended Comments TULSA PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN SURVEY Table of Contents Prior to the current CDC guidelines and restrictions on accessing parks and recreational facilities that were put into effect for COVID-19, which parks/recreation facilities have been used by your household in the past? (other) ......................................................... 1 Please rate how important the following facilities and services are to your household. (other) ............................................................................................................................ 6 Which of the following amenities does your household use when visiting public parks and recreation facilities? (other) .................................................................................. 15 What are the most important areas that, if addressed by the City of Tulsa, would increase your use of parks and recreation facilities, services, and programs? (more facilities and amenities; more programs; other) ........................................................... 17 Over the next 5 to 10 years, what are the most important needs for parks and recreation facilities and amenities to be added, expanded, or improved upon in Tulsa? (other) .......................................................................................................................... 31 Over the next 5 to 10 years, what are the most important needs for programs and services to be added, expanded, or improved upon in Tulsa? (other) .......................... 38 What -
Thesis from Parks to Presidents: Political
THESIS FROM PARKS TO PRESIDENTS: POLITICAL SENSIBILITIES OF NARRATIVE POLITICAL FICTION Submitted by Seth J. Willden Department of Communication Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2016 Master’s Committee Advisor: Nick Marx Karrin Vasby Anderson Doug Cloud Copyright by Seth J. Willden 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT FROM PARKS TO PRESIDENTS: POLITICAL SENSIBILITIES OF NARRATIVE POLITICAL FICTION This thesis examines the ways televised narrative political fiction can portray political sensibilities. Using the NBC program, Parks and Recreation (2009-2015), and the Netflix streaming service program, House of Cards (2013-2016), I explore how narrative television presents political philosophies to audiences, equipping them to discuss political discourse. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Before we begin discussing the political implications of narrative television, I must first provide a narrative of acknowledgement. The MA program in Communication Studies is only a two-year program, and this document marks the end of that two-year journey. But I have been at Colorado State for five years. In a way, the last chapter of this thesis will be the last literal chapter of my five-year career as a CSU student. I wish to first thank the professors that transformed my understanding of the world: Dr. Thomas Dunn, Dr. Scott Diffrient, and Dr. Eric Aoki. You were my first communication studies professors. Each in turn provided excellent education, guidance and support throughout my time as a scholar. I will never forget your pedagogical styles and hunger for understanding the communicative processes of our world. Next I want to thank my thesis committee: Dr. -
Repowered Feminist Analysis of Parks and Recreation
Repowered Feminist Analysis of Parks and Recreation A Thesis submitted to Southern Utah University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Professional Communication December 2018 By Bailee M. Bahr Southern Utah University Thesis Committee: Kevin Stein, PhD, Chair I certify that I have read and viewed this project and that, in my opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Professional Communication. Repowered Feminist Analysis 1 Kevin Stein __________________________________ Kevin Stein, Ph.D., Capstone Chair Matthew Barton __________________________________ Matthew Barton, Ph.D., MAPC Graduate Director Abstract Repowered Feminist Analysis 2 This paper analyzes the television show Parks and Recreation in order to find principles of Foss and Foss’ (2009) characteristics of repowered feminism. This paper aims to discover if Leslie Knope represents a new form of feminism, what characteristics specifically that she represents, and if these qualities contribute to a freer, less oppressed Leslie Knope. The analysis examines three episodes of the show and uses feminist rhetorical criticism to analyze the findings. I found that repowered feminism applies both to a feminist’s concerns with feminist issues and the applicability of repowered feminism to all types of problem solving. Knope, whether focusing directly on feminist issues or on the various obstacles she faces while doing her job, is usually presented as more successful when she implements the characteristics of repowered feminism. Keywords: parks and recreation, repowered feminism, pop culture Acknowledgements A massive hug and kiss to my adorable husband who encouraged me to finish my thesis in spite of the plethora of excuses. -
Parks-And-Rec.Pdf
Table of Contents ________________________________________ Letter from the Director…………………………………………………....2 - 3 Watch Guide / Favorite Episodes……………………………………….......3 - 4 Overview…………………………………...………………………...............5 - 6 Characters / Portfolio Powers…………….…………………………….....6 - 14 Parks and Recreation Welcome to Pawnee, Indiana, home to the Parks and Recreation department run by Ron Swanson (but really, it's all thanks to Deputy Director Leslie Knope). A small town that serves as Everytown, USA, Pawnee has problems, from its obesity crisis to the raccoon infestation to the corrupt Sweetums Candy Company dominating the economy. But no problem is too big or small to be solved by Pawnee local government. This committee begins at season 6, right when the pretentious town of Eagleton goes bankrupt and the merger begins. Will Leslie be recalled as city councilwoman? What will happen with Rent-A-Swag? How will two towns that have lived as sworn enemies integrate? From Ron to Donna to Ben to Ann to Garry-Jerry-Larry-Terry, it's up to Pawnee's Department of Parks and Recreation to save the merger--and perhaps the town itself. 1 Letter from the Director ________________________________________ Delegates, Welcome! It is my privilege to welcome you to FCMUN as your crisis director. Last year, I was the crisis director for the Democratic National Committee and it was a blast, ending in Chance the Rapper being declared Emperor of my home city of Chicago, Bill De Blasio annihilating Trump Tower with the help of his assistant Kim Kardashian, and Bernie leading a secession movement for the northeast states. I can’t wait to see you all plot and solve more crazy crises.