DOCSLIB.ORG

Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report REPORT OF THE OMMITTEE OF THE PROBLEMS OF MUNDI<ARS» IN THE UNION TERRITORY OF GOA, DAMAN AND DIU X9(J):(Z).23148.N71 K6 119471 PRINTeD AT THE GOVERNMENT PI:INTING PRESS, •PANJIM-1966 GJ.I.i' THE COMMITTEE QIE Tl{!E PR0¥fi}!t.\ OF <<MUNDKARS>> IN THE UNION TERRITORY OF GOA, DAMAN AND DIU Chapters Pages r. l'N'l'ROIDUCTION • . • . •• • • •• •• • • •• l!r. HISTORY OiF IR>El!.JA.'I!OCl'NSIH:IIP iBIE'l'w.EEN :ciMUND'KAJRIS> .AJNID «<BHA.'llKiAJRlS> • • • • • • • • • • . • • •• l!rr. •ENQurRY BY THE COMiMiiTl'EE 7~0 llV. !F'1INIDllN'GS AND RIEOOM!MiENIDATIONIS OF 'IIHIE OOIMIMil'liDEE 21:-39 Appendices T. IMlJN[)IKAIR. LAW:- (<>) ROYtAL DEORIElE OiF 24th AIUGlJIST 1901; (•R!EWOKEJD) 41-42 (~) LEGliSLA.TWE OIRDER Nil. 19!>2, DA'l'ElD OOtih NOVtElMBER 1959 ... ]![. :Fru}FOIR.iMA. SENT TO THE VILLA.GE iPAN<JHiA,Y.A'l1S AN'D. IF'.AJC:nUAIL nATA COIJUElC'I1ED IRIEGM!iol!N'G IM'UlN'IliKAIR. 4'7-& liiL EXrl1RIA.CT FROM THlE <XJIDE OF OOiM!UNmi>AlDES RELA'l1llNG TO .DEASES OF LAJNID FOR !(J()INSTR/UCTroN OiF RffilSIDEN- 54~1 liV. 'PIR.OiPOSED 1F101UiR'I1H J;1D¥E YEAIR PILAN FOR HOIUSING IN 62-66 'I'ABiLES SHOW!ING DE'I'Al'LED IF'AC'lU.A!L !DATA IWlTH REFlElR!ElNOE TO A.PIPEND!IiX n:. Introduction Soon after the popular Government assumed office, it was observed that the Land Reforms Commission, which had submitted its Report in February. 1964, had ~eft out of it;; ambit, a very important problem that existed in this Territory, namely, rellab'onship between «iBhatkars» and «MundkarS>>. The former were the land owners and the latter were originally deemed to be settlers for watch and ward a111.d for looking after the property, in c6nsideration Olf which they were permitted to construct dwelfu!g houses in the land. The contractual obligations between the «<Bhatkars» and «!Mundkars» were laid down in Decree dated 24-8•19(}1, which were subsequently amplified and modified in Legislative Order No. 1952, dalt.ed 26-11-1959. Government felt that the various provisions of the law required further modifieations in the context of SociQ-IEcorromic and the constitutional changes that had talren place in the Territory. In the meanwhile, Shri D. K. Chopdenlrer, M. L. A., sought to move a reso­ lution in the Legis!atiye Assembly, on the problem. Accordinglly, a Com­ mittee was appointed in Apri11964 under the Chairmanship of Shri Tony Fernandes, MiniSter for Agriculture, to go into the question furt;her and make suitable reco=endations for putting the relationship between the «Bhatkars» and «'Mundka.rs» on a more ratiorra.'l. and permanent basis. Besides the Chairman, the Co=ittee comprised of the.following: ,;;-- 1. Dr. Sebastiao Mazarelo, M. L. A. 2. Shri Orlando s. Lobo ,M. L. lA. 3. Shri Gana'ba [)essai, M. L. A. 4. Shri Jaysingrao Rlme, M. L.A. 5. Shri Dattaram K. Chopdenker, M. L. A. · (Ex-Officio as Mover Olf the Resolution) 6. Shrl Sridor Tamba, Govt. Pleader, P!liiljim. 7. Dr. S. A. Nadkarni', (on his retirement from Govt. Service). The Development Commissioner was appointed as Member-"Secretary. Subsequently, he was rePlaced by the Revenue SecretarY. 2. The Collliirittee held 5 meetings and also Visited certain villages in Bardez, Sa1celte, Quepem, Pernem and Goa Ta.'l.uk!as. The Co=ittee. also invited the views of members Olf t:he public, Panchayats, Bliock Develop- ment Committees and other organisations, for purposes of considering · a reform of the «!Mundkar» legislation. A notice askmg for the views ' of the public was published on ~~1965 with a s'tiiplrlation that sugges­ tions should be sent to the Committee within a period of one month either in person or by post. The following prominent citizens were also addressed specifically for giving their valuable advi<ce in this matter al!ld some of them have replied:__; 1. Shri Yeshwant Ba:bu Probhu iDessai (Quepem) 2. Shri Gopal Apa Kamat (Bichollm) · 3. Shri Jaiwantrao Sardessa:i ('Bicholim) 4. Dr. Antonio Furtado (Chinchinim) 5. Shri Viswanath Lawa:nde (Pa:njim) . 6. Shri Peter !Alvares, M. P. 7. Shri Pandurang Mulgaonkar (:Mapu!;a) 8. Shri Narsinha Naik (!Margao) 9. 'President, Associacao dos Proprietarios e Agricultores. 10. Dr. Paulo L. Teles (Panjim) 11. Shri Antonio Noronha Rodrigues (iPanjim). 3. As a reslrlt of the enquiries conducted by the Cormiri'ttee and talcing into consideration the various suggestions and Views received in response to the notice, the Committee were able to arrive at certain broad conclu­ sions described in subsequent chapters. 4. Copies of the Decree and Legislative Diploma are ·at Appendix I. 5. A detahled factual analysis of the present position in rega!rd to dis­ tribution of «Mundkars» in the Tettitory is at Appenlfur. II. 6. An extract from the «_Code of Comunidades» relating to leases of land for various purposes including construction of hou.Ses, is at Appen­ dix m. 7. The draft Plan of this 'Administration on «!Housing» for the Fourth Five Year Plan rs at Appendix :W> . - - 8. The rEIOO=endations of the Committee are contained in Chap- ~~ .. .. 2 CHAPTER II Brief history of relationship between Mundkars and Bhatkars It is very diffiiCult to trace the histocy of «Mundkarism», as there are no re>cords to show how thi's system was first introduced in Goa.· It·looks from the records that only whe'n some conflicts arose, some legislation was introduced in 1901. Earlier to that, nothing is known a~bout <<Mund­ karism>>. 2. However, Mundkarism is essentially a land problem for a homestead and as such, the question as .to who settled ori. the [and fi!rst- wh&ther the lan<Hord or the mundk~a.r- needs rto be> e'Xa.Illined. There is a certain system pre'Va'lent in Goa, known as «Gauntons» of the Cunbis, where> the ! Cun'bis ~e>d on the> Goveriunent land for ages together and develOped ' - that land and still continue to be on the same land without any disturbance. In certaitn cases there are> no records even to prove that the Cunbis pos­ sessed that land !~ally. It belongs to them only by virtue of their oC'Cupy-. ing the> same> for centuries together. Only in some> cases we -find that this occupation :is legalil9e>d.'by them by obtaining -«Aforamentos» of the occu­ pied land. Such <<Gauntons» are mainly av:ailalble in the remote parts of Goa, such as, in thE! Ne>w Conquest areas, wher.e the in-roods of proprie­ torships were rather slow. We do not notice such <<Gaunt{)lllS» systems on that large scal.e in the Old Conquest areaJS, where> the in-roods to proprie­ torship have made rapid progress. · 3, It :is, therefore, felt that on a. larger scale th~ settlement on the Go- 1 vernment land by the agriculturist co=tinity must have come first and thereafter may be that some private -parties applied fo~ the land and got it in their own name as <<AforamentoS» or, on sale from the, Government. The occupation of the old community on that la.nd continued and the occupants became Mundkars of the new legal possessors, L e. the land-. lords. Thus overnight the whole village or the settlement was converted into m~4kar settlements, as the landlords came into the picture. 4.- It is .possible that in .the Old Conquest a.reaJS, a.l:l the «Gautons» 3JI'e converted into private properties .and the people living thereill are converted ·into mundkars. Hence we do not se.e <<Gaunton» system en -a large scale in these areas. 3 5. So it can safely be said that the mundkars came on the land first, which perhaps was not developed, and the landlord came afterwards, who developed that land in a systematic way. This may be the remote history right at the time when the change was taking place from the Government or Jagirdari· Ownership of the land to that of private owner­ ship. 6. At a later stage when the tendency to own land went on increasing, the ownership extended to the New Conquest Areas also,. where the po­ pulation was rather, scanty and finding the need of labour to develop the land, may be exact opposite developments took place in that area, though not on a large scale, but on a comparatively small scale. Here the landlord must have obtained the land first and put a sufficient number of settlers on the land as !Ilundkars. 7. So in the first case it looks that the settlers were on the land first. Whereas in the second case, the ownership of the land came first. «Gauntons» system in that area remained, as it was not distur~ because there was no land scarcity in that area~ 8. Gradua:lly the ownership thus increased and it was found that practically very little land worth settling was left with the Government and 'as the population went on increasing and the need for more land for houses was felt, there was no other alternative but to request either the lmdlords or the Comunidades or any other land owning agencies· for a piece of land for dwelling houses and since the landlords also wanted \ their areas to be inhabited for various reasons, the same i. e. the land, was given very freely. Evolution took place, all-round development us­ hered in and even the social statuS and the position of the mundkars want on changing. Mundkars could no more be treated as complete de­ pendents and conflicts perhaps was the restilt: Various evils in the system of dominated and suppressed class of people must have also created re­ action amongst the mundkarii)1glllinst 'the ]andlords, but the mundkars had to live with the situation: ' 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minutes of the 8 Goa State Environment Impact Assessment
    Minutes of the 8th Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Goa-SEIAA) held on 1st April 2013 at 04.00 p.m. in the Conference room of the EIA Secretariat, O/o Goa State Pollution Control Board (GSPCB), Patto. The eighth meeting of the Goa-SEIAA was held on 1st April 2013 in the Conference room of the GSPCB under the Chairmanship of Mr. Jose M. Noronha. The list of members is annexed (refer Annexure – 1). At the outset, Chairman welcomed the Members and informed about the purpose of convening the meeting at the very short notice. Accordingly, Agenda Items ( refer Annexure – 2) were taken up for detailed deliberation / discussions and suitable decision in the matter, namely - 1. The Authority, w.r.t. the matter pertaining to strengthening the EIA-Goa State Secretariat has agreed to undertake – a. Recruitment of staff on contract / temporary / deputation basis b. Hiring / purchase of office premises to function independently c. Charging of scrutiny fees from prospective project proponents (PPs’) at the rate of 0.02% of the project cost but limited to Rs. 1 lakh only. Accordingly, it was decided to put up a detailed proposal, justifying the need to strengthen the Authority, to the Government for its approval prior to initiate any further action in the matter. 2. The Authority decided to consider the following two expansion proposals subject to payment of ‘penalty’ @ Rs. 500/- per sq.mts. of already constructed area as on date and issue prior Environmental Clearance (EC) with a mandatory compliance to provisions of the Office Memorandum (O.M.) issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Gazette Government ·Of Go~ Daman and Diu
    REGD. GOA 51 Panaji, 28th July, 1977 (Sravana 6, 1899) SERIES III No. 17 OFFICIAL GAZETTE GOVERNMENT ·OF GO~ DAMAN AND DIU GOVERNMENT OF GOA•. DAMAN AND DIU Home Department (Transport and A~commodation) Directorate of Transport Public Notice I - Applications have been received for grant of renewal of stage carriage permits to operate on the following routes :_ Date ot Date ot Sr. No. receipt expiry Name and address of the applicant M. V.No. 1. 16·5·77 20·9·77 Mis. Amarante & Saude Transport, Cuncolim, Salcete~Goa. Margao to GDT 2299 Mapusa via Ponda, Sanquelim. Bicholim & back. (Renewal of GDPst/ 396/70). 2. 6·6·77 21·11·77 Shri Sebastiao PaIha, H; No. 321, St. Lourenco, Agasaim, Ilhas-Goa. GDT 2188 Agasalm toPanaji & back. (Renewal of GDPst/98/66). 3. 6·6·77 26·12·77 Shri Sivahari Rama Tiloji, Gudem, Siolim, Bardez-Goa. SioUm to Mapusa GDT 2017 & back. (Renewal of GDPst/136/66). 4. 9·6·77 16·10·77 8hri Kashinath Bablo Naik, H. No. 83, Post Porvorim, Bardez-Goa. Mapusa GDT 2270 to Panaji & back (Renewal of GDPst/346/70). 5. 9·6·77 16·10·77 Shri Kashinath Bablo Naik, H. No. 83, Post Porvorim, Bardez-Goa. Mapusa GDT 2147 to Panaji & back. (Renewal of GDPst/345/70). 6. 15·6·77 28·12·77 Shri Arjun F. Ven~rIenkar, Baradi, Velim, Salcete-Goa. Betul to Margao GDT 2103 via Velim. Assolna, Cuncolim, Chinchinim & back. (Renewal of GDPst/ /151/66). 7. 24-6·77 3·11·77 Janata Transport Company, Curtorim, Salcete--Goa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tradition of Serpent Worship in Goa: a Critical Study Sandip A
    THE TRADITION OF SERPENT WORSHIP IN GOA: A CRITICAL STUDY SANDIP A. MAJIK Research Student, Department of History, Goa University, Goa 403206 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: As in many other States of India, the State of Goa has a strong tradition of serpent cult from the ancient period. Influence of Naga people brought rich tradition of serpent worship in Goa. In the course of time, there was gradual change in iconography of serpent deities and pattern of their worship. There exist a few writings on serpent worship in Goa. However there is much scope to research further using recent evidences and field work. This is an attempt to analyse the tradition of serpent worship from a historical and analytical perspective. Keywords: Nagas, Tradition, Sculpture, Inscription The Ancient World The Sanskrit word naga is actually derived from the word naga, meaning mountain. Since all the Animal worship is very common in the religious history Dravidian tribes trace their origin from mountains, it of the ancient world. One of the earliest stages of the may probably be presumed that those who lived in such growth of religious ideas and cult was when human places came to be called Nagas.6 The worship of serpent beings conceived of the animal world as superior to deities in India appears to have come from the Austric them. This was due to obvious deficiency of human world.7 beings in the earliest stages of civilisation. Man not equipped with scientific knowledge was weaker than the During the historical migration of the forebears of animal world and attributed the spirit of the divine to it, the modern Dravidians to India, the separation of the giving rise to various forms of animal worship.
    [Show full text]
  • SSC Result Booklet April-May 2020
    Goa Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education Alto Betim-Goa APRIL-MAY 2020 Result Tuesday, 28th July, 2020 Certified that the Result of SSC Exam. April-May 2020 is prepared as per the rules of the Board in force. (Bhagirath G. Shetye) Secretary To be published strictly after 04.30 p.m. on 28th July, 2020 76 1 INDEX Sr.No. Particulars Page No. I Performance Report 3 II List of the Schools with Cent 4 Percent Results III School-wise Performance of 10 Candidates (at Glance) IV Centre-wise Performance of 33 candidates V Centre-wise Result 37 2 I. PERFORMANCE REPORT The SSC Examination was re-scheduled from 21st May, 2020 to 6th June, 2020 at 29 examination centres across the state, due to pandemic situation. A total of 18939 candidates registered under whole category (without exemption) for the SSC Examination of April-May, 2020. Out of 18939 candidates 17554 candidates pass the SSC Examination of April-May 2020 giving pass percentage of 92.69%. A total of 737 candidates registered under repeater/ITI category for the SSC Examination of April-May, 2020. Out of 737 candidates 345 candidates pass SSC Examination of April-May 2020 giving pass percentage of 46.81%. Result at a glance (Regular candidates): Appeared Passed Pass % Boys 9319 8581 92.08 Girls 9620 8973 93.27 Total 18939 17554 92.69 Highest and Lowest Pass Percentage centres Name of the Centre Enrollment Pass % Mangueshi 258 98.06 (Highest) Kepem 441 86.85 (Lowest) Highest and Lowest Enrollment centres Name of the Centre Enrollment Pass % Navelim 1522 94.28 (Highest) Paingin 230 96.96 (Lowest) 3 List of Schools with Cent Percent Results School Name Appeard Passed NI percentage 01.02-ST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) – an Overview
    CHAPTER I Introduction The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) – An Overview In India, our rural masses lack the basic infrastructure facilities to sustain their life. Rural India constitutes about 72 % of the total population. Their small holdings provide them with minimal yield to support their existence. The opportunities to have better standard of living in rural areas of our country are minimal. In this regard, the Govt. of India has introduced NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE Act in September, 2005in the Parliament, and launched National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in February, 2006in the selected 200districts of the country. It was further extended to 113 districts on April1st, 2007 and it is now operational in all districts from April 1st,2008. The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), presently known as The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is a Central sponsored wage employment scheme which aims at providing livelihood security to the rural poor. The Act is an important step towards realization of the right to work. It is also expected to enhance people’s livelihood on a sustained basis by developing the economic and social infrastructure in rural areas. The objective of the Act is to enhance livelihood security in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. The MGNREGS emphasis on community participation in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation (Social Audit) of the programme. Goa: Goa, a tiny emerald land on the west coast of India, the 25thState in the Union of States of India, was liberated from Portuguese rule in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Gram Panchayat Development Plan Vp Chinchinim – Deussua
    GRAM PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN V. P. CHINCHINIM – DEUSSUA GRAM PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENTAL PLAN OF VILLAGE PANCHAYAT CHINCHINIM- DEUSSUA Village Development Plan Chinchinim- Deussua 1 GRAM PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN V. P. CHINCHINIM – DEUSSUA PH No. 2863283 Office of Village Panchayat Chinchinim - Deussua Salcete -Goa. Ref.No. VP / CD /2018-19/ Date: To, The Block Development Officer, South Shri. Mathany Saldhana Administrative Complex, ‘C’ Block, 2nd Floor, Room No. 223, Margao, Salcete Goa. Sub: Gram Panchayat Developmental Plan of Village Panchayat Chinchinim- Deussua Sir, We enclose herewith one set of Gram Panchayat Developmental Plan (GPDP) of Village Panchayat Chinchinim- Deussua, prepared as per the participatory planning process in the prescribed format for your information. The works of GPDP is already approved by Village Development committee and Gramsabha, necessary correction/ changes to the same will be intimated to you immediately. Kindly acknowledge the receipt of the same. Thanking you, ____________________ (Smt. Roquizinha Fernandes) Secretary, V.P. Chinchinim- Deussua Enclosed: one set of GPDP of V.P. Chinchinim- Deussua Village Development Plan Chinchinim- Deussua 2 GRAM PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN V. P. CHINCHINIM – DEUSSUA Draft Status Report cum GPDP of Village Panchayat of Chinchinim- Deussua Index Sr. No. Description Page No. 1. Inauguration of 3-days meet for planning of GPDP of V.P. Chinchinim- Deussua 2. Aims and Objectives 3. I. Introduction of the Village of Chinchinim II. Schemes and Programmes implemented by the Village Panchayat of Chinchinim III. Observation / Information collected during Field Visits, PRA, FGDs, etc. a) Sector Visit – Anganvaddi Centres at Chinchinim & Baida b) Sector Visit – Primary Health Centre & Sub Health Centre c) Sector Visit – Telephone exchange d) Focus Group Discussion with Farmers e) Sector Visit – Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEXURE 5.8 (CHAPTER V , PARA 25) FORM 9 List of Applications For
    ANNEXURE 5.8 (CHAPTER V , PARA 25) FORM 9 List of Applications for inclusion received in Form 6 Designated location identity (where Constituency (Assembly/£Parliamentary): Velim Revision identity applications have been received) 1. List number@ 2. Period of applications (covered in this list) From date To date 24/10/2020 24/10/2020 3. Place of hearing * Serial number$ Date of receipt Name of claimant Name of Place of residence Date of Time of of application Father/Mother/ hearing* hearing* Husband and (Relationship)# 1 24/10/2020 SOONI FERNANDES ALEIXO FERNANDES (F) 395, KURSAVADDO, VELIM, , 2 24/10/2020 VALESKA VINCENT VINCENT PIEDADE DIAS 526, BAGA, VELIM, , DIAS (F) £ In case of Union territories having no Legislative Assembly and the State of Jammu and Kashmir Date of exhibition at @ For this revision for this designated location designated location under Date of exhibition at Electoral * Place, time and date of hearings as fixed by electoral registration officer rule 15(b) Registration Officer’s Office under $ Running serial number is to be maintained for each revision for each designated rule 16(b) location # Give relationship as F-Father, M=Mother, and H=Husband within brackets i.e. (F), (M), (H) 07/12/2020 ANNEXURE 5.8 (CHAPTER V , PARA 25) FORM 9 List of Applications for inclusion received in Form 6 Designated location identity (where Constituency (Assembly/£Parliamentary): Velim Revision identity applications have been received) 1. List number@ 2. Period of applications (covered in this list) From date To date 26/10/2020 26/10/2020
    [Show full text]
  • O~Fficial Gazette Government of Goa
    , UCa~ ~A.I I "Panaji, 16th January, 1989 IPausa 26, 1910J . SERIES II No. 41 O~FFICIAL GAZETTE GOVERNMENT OF GOA j I EXTRf\ORDI Nf\RY I e Vasco-da-Gama for a period, of 30 days f(om. the date of GOVERNMENT OF GOA publication of this Notif~cation in Official Gazette. Revenue Department !. SCHEDULE (Description of the said land) I Notification I Taluk(1..: Salcete City: Margao t No .. 22/78/88-RD P. T, Sheet it Names of the persons believed Appro%lma.te Whereas appears to the Appropriate Government (here­ No. , to be interested area in Inafter referred t'O as "the Government") that the land Chalta No .. sq. mts, specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred t'O as 8 the "said land") is likely t'O be needed for public purpos.e viz. 2 Land Acquisition for P. H. E. _Complex at Botda Margao (additional area). 133/20 part Elvinal Gracias Ferreiro. 2665.00 173/23 part V. J. Kamat. 60.00 Now. -Therefore, the Government hereby notifies, under sub­ 195/1 part Comunidade of Margao. 810.00 -section -< 1 >- of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894) (hereinafter . referred to as the North:Chaita No. 20/PTS 133 "said Act") that the said land is likely to be needed for chaita No. 20/PTS 173. the pUrpOSl~ specified above. South: Chaita No. 20/PTS 133, 2. All persons interested in the Said land are hereby 23/PTS 173, l/PTS 195. warned- not to obstruct or interfere with, any surveyor or East: Chalta No.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL GAZETTE GOVERNMENT of GOA, DAMAN and DIU " Extftl\ 0 Ft DIN F\ Ftv
    IREGD. GOA- 5 1 Panaji, 2nd March, 1974 (Phalguna 11, 1895) SERIES I Noo 48 OFFICIAL GAZETTE GOVERNMENT OF GOA, DAMAN AND DIU " EXTftl\ 0 ft DIN f\ ftV 3. Siolim 31-Canca, 30-Verla, 29-Anjuna, 33-Assa­ GOVERNMENT OF GOA, DAMAN gao, 36-Siotim, 35-0xel, 1-Camurlim, 2-Colvale, 3-Revora, 4-Nadora, 5-Pirna AND DIU villages in Bardez Taluka. 4. Calangute 21-Calangute, 20-Candolim, 19-Nerul (Re­ Office of the Chief Electoral Officer is Magos), .18-Pilerne (Marra), 22-Sa­ liga:o, 23-Sangolda, 27-Nagoa, 28-Ar­ pora, and 26-Parra villages in Bardez Notification "Taluka. 4·4-72/Elec. Vol. (ID) 5. Mapusa Mapusa Town and 34-Marna, 9-Moira, 14-Ucassaim, 15-Punola, 16-Paliem. The following Notification No. 282/GD/74 dated 24-Guirim, 25-Bastora villages in Bar­ 26-2-1974 issued by the Delimitation Commission, dez Taluka. India, New Delhi, is hereby published for general 6. TiVlm 8-Tivim, 7 -Sircaim, 6-Asoollora, a8-Moi­ information. tern, 39-Corjuem, 40-Ponolem, 41-Cal­ vim, 11-Aldona, 10-Nachinola, 12-01au" B. M. Masurkar, Chief Electoral Officer. lim, 13-Pomburpa, 17-Serula villages Panaji, 2nd March, 1974. in Bardez Taluka. 7. Bicholim Bicholim Town and 2-Sirigao, 3-Mulgao. 4-Adwapale, 5-Latambarcem, 6-Du­ macem, 7-Mencurem. 8-Salem, 24-Na­ Delimitation Commission, India roa, 25-Atrull, 26-Vaingunim, 27-Maem. 29-Maulinguem Nerth and 30-0na vil­ Nirvaoh(ln Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110001 lages in Bicholim 'l'aluka. Dated: February 26, 1974. 8. Pale Bicholim Taluka (excluding 2-Sirigao, 3-Mulgao, 4-Adwapale, 5-Latambar­ Notification cem, 6-Dumacem, 7-Mencurem, 8-Sa­ lem, 24.-Naroa, 25-Aturli, 26-Vaingui­ In pursuance of clau~e (a) of :;ub-section (2) of nim, 27-Maem, 29-Maulinguem North section 9 of the neliMjtaVon Act, 1!)72.
    [Show full text]
  • Sr. II No. 40 Ext. No. 2.Pmd
    Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2018-20 RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410 Panaji, 7th January, 2020 (Pausa 17,1941) SERIES II No. 40 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY EXTRAORDINARY No. 2 GOVERNMENT OF GOA Department of Elections Goa State Election Commission — Order No. 5/26/GZPNS/Elec/2019-SEC/21 In exercise of the powers vested in me under Rule 2 (e) of the Goa Panchayat and Zilla Panchayat (Election Procedure) Rules, 1996, I, R. K. Srivastava, Commissioner of Goa State Election Commission, Panaji-Goa hereby appoint the following Officers as Returning Officers and Assistant Returning Officers within their concerned jurisdiction for the ensuing General Election to Zilla Panchayat of North Goa District in respect of the Zilla Panchayat Constituencies mentioned below:- Sr. Name of the Zilla Name of the Name of the Assistant No. Panchayat Constituencies Returning Officers Returning Officers 1 2 3 4 1. 1. Arambol Deputy Collector & SDO of Mamlatdar of Pernem Taluka, 2. Morjim Pernem Sub-Division, Pernem-Goa. 3. Dhargal Pernem-Goa 4. Torxem 2. 1. Colvale Deputy Collector & SDO-I Mamlatdar of Bardez Taluka, 2. Aldona of Bardez Sub-Division, Mapusa-Goa. 3. Penha-de-Franca Mapusa-Goa 4. Reis-Magos 5. Socorro 3. 1. Calangute Deputy Collector & SDO-II of Joint Mamlatdar-I of Bardez 2. Anjuna Bardez Sub-Division, Taluka, Mapusa-Goa. 3. Sirsai Mapusa-Goa 4. Siolim 4. 1. Taleigao Deputy Collector & SDO of Mamlatdar of Tiswadi Taluka, 2. Santa Cruz Panaji Sub-Division, Panaji-Goa. 3. Chimbel Panaji-Goa 4. St. Lawrence (Agacaim) 5. Corlim 727 Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected] OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT.
    [Show full text]
  • Series III No. 33.P65
    Reg. No. GR/RNP/GOA/32 RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410 Panaji, 14th November, 2013 (Kartika 23, 1935) SERIES III No. 33 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY Note:- There is one Supplementary issue to the Official 24-06-1938, are hereby notified to appear in this Gazette, Series III No. 32 dated 7th November, office on 25-11-2013 at 11.00 a.m. in order to choose 2013 namely, Supplement dated 8-11-2013 from in a meeting one of the heirs for the bestowal of the pages 1027 to 1042 regarding Notification from land described above. Department of Finance (Revenue and Expenditure Division), Directorate of Small Savings & Lotteries To make it known to all concerned parties, this (Goa State Lotteries). notice is published and copies thereof will be affixed at the usual places as required by law. GOVERNMENT OF GOA Chandrakant B. Shetkar, Mamlatdar. Department of Education, Art & Culture Pernem, 31st day of October, 2013. Goa University V. No. A-7604/2013. ___________ ___ Notification Notice Ref: 12/Exam-UG/2013/478 No. MAM/PER/BST-MAND/624/2013 I, the undersigned Prof. Vijayendra P. Kamat, I, Shri C. B. Shetkar, Mamlatdar of Pernem Taluka, Registrar, Goa University, hereby notify for the hereby make it known in pursuance of Article 3 of information of all concerned that the 26th Annual Legislative Diploma No. 349 dated 08-11-1928 that Convocation of Goa University will be held on all the heirs of late Sebastiao Fernandes, resident of Tuesday, 7th January, 2014 beginning at 10.30 a.m. Ashwem, Mandrem, Pernem Taluka, assignee of at the Jubilee Hall, University Campus, Taleigao Government Land known as Lote No.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Gazette Governmentof.Goa
    REGD. GOA 5'· Panaji,10lh August 1918 (Sravana 19, 1900) SERIES III No. 19 OFFICIAL GAZETTE GOVERNMENTOF.GOA, . DAMAN AND DIU .. GOVERNMENT OF GOA, DAMAN AND DIU Home Department (General) Directorate of Tramp';rt Public Notice I-Applications have been received for grant of renewal of st~ge carriage pennits to operate on the following routes: Date Da.te Name and a.ddress -ot the applicant Y. V. No. S. No. of receipt ot expiry 1. 6·5-78 23- 9-78 Shri Sudam A. 'Moraskar, Calangute, Bardez..Goa. Baga to Panaji via GDT 2429 Candolim, Sinquerim and back. (Renewal of GDPst/579/75). 2. 6·5·78 10· 9-78 Shri Ashok M. Mandrekar, Mandrem, H. No. 270, Pernem-Goa.. Patradevi GDT 2139 to Mahakhazan via Pernem and back. (Renewal of GDPst/429/70). 3. 15·5-78 29· 9·78 Shri Jose Novais, Goa Velha, H. No. 43, nhas~Goa. Panaji to Agasaim GDT 2012 ."fr" and back. (Renewal of GDPst/44/66). 4. 15·5-78 25- 9-78 Shri Amarante Vaz, 78, Near Church, CUncolim-Goa. Velim to Mormugao GDT 2313 Harbour and back. (Renewal of GDPst/524/72). 5. 15-5-78 19-10-78 Mis. Laxmi Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., Assolna, Salcete-Goa. Ambelim GDT 1827· to Margao via Assolna, Ch~chinim and vice versa. (Renewal of GDPst/460/71). 6. 15-5-78 19·10-78 Mis. Laxmi Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., AssoIna, Salcete-Goa. Margao to GDT 2053 Assolna to Betul and vice versa. (Renewal of GDPst/459/71). 7. 22·5-78 4· 9-78 Shri Sagun Gonsu Naik, Ribandar, Dhas-Goa.
    [Show full text]