DOCSLIB.ORG

CRSQ Summer 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CRSQ Summer 2009 CREATION RESEARCH SOCIETY Q U A RT E R LY VolumeQ 46 Fall 2009 Number 2 THE EVOLUTION OF DINOSAURS: MUCH CONJECTURE, LITTLE EVIDENCE THE REGION OF EDEN STELLAR RADIATION ENTROPY PROVENANCE STUDIES OF CLASTIC SEDIMENTS ARE THE ASHFALL SEDIMENTS Q AND FOSSILS POST-FLOOD? Creation Research Society Quarterly Volume 46 Fall 2009 Number 2 Articles Departments Are the Ashfall Site Sediments Editorial: Shakespeare or Bonzo ................................. 77 and Fossils Post-Flood? ........................................ 81 Book Reviews Michael J. Oard The Global Phenomenon of Human Fossil The Region of Eden: Analysis and Debate ................. 93 Footprints in Rock by Aaron Judkins ............... 92 Joel D. Klenck A Boy Out of Time: A Time Twins Adventure by D. B. Macks ..............................108 Provenance Studies of Clastic Sediments The New Creationism by Paul Garner ..................118 and Their Role in a Hydrodynamic The Evolution Controversy: A Survey of Interpretation of the Genesis Flood ...................109 Competing Schools by Thomas S. Fowler John K. Reed and Carl R. Froede Jr. and Daniel Kuebler ...................................... 125 The Evolution of Dinosaurs: God of Wonders DVD ........................................... 132 Much Conjecture, Little Evidence ....................119 Extinction of Evolution by Darek Isaacs ............... 147 Jerry Bergman Notes from the Panorama of Science Stellar Radiation Entropy as Evidence Lessons from Twentieth-Century Geology ........... 133 of Supernatural Order and Creation ................. 127 Letters to the Editor ...................................................138 James R. Powell Author and Title Index for Volume 45 ...................... 143 Instructions to Authors ...............................................149 Cover design by Michael Erkel: Michael Erkel and Associates, 1171 Carter Street, Membership/Subscription Application Crozet, Virginia 22932 and Renewal Form ............................................... 151 Design services by Cindy Blandon, [email protected]. Order Blank for Past Issues ........................................ 152 The Creation Research Society Quarterly is published by the Creation Research Society, 6801 N. Highway 89, Editorial Staff Chino Valley, AZ 86323, and it is indexed in the Christian Kevin L. Anderson, Editor Periodical Index and the Zoological Record. Jerry Bergman, Biology Editor Send papers on all subjects to the Editor: George F. Howe, Assistant Biology Editor [email protected] or to Kevin L. Anderson, John K. Reed, Geology Editor Van Andel Creation Research Center, 6801 N. Highway 89, Eugene F. Chaffin, Physics Editor Chino Valley, AZ 86323. Ronald G. Samec, Astronomy Editor Send book reviews to the Book Review Editor: Don B. Don B. DeYoung, Book Review Editor DeYoung, 200 Seminary Dr., Winona Lake, IN 46590. Jarl Waggoner, Managing Editor Robert Mullin, Assistant Managing Editor Authors’ opinions expressed in the Quarterly are not neces- sarily those of anyone else associated with the Creation Board of Directors Research Society. Don B. DeYoung, President Copyright © 2009 by Creation Research Society. All rights Eugene F. Chaffin,Vice-President to the articles published in the Creation Research Society Glen W. Wolfrom, Membership Secretary Quarterly are reserved to the Creation Research Society. Danny Faulkner, Treasurer Permission to reprint material in any form, including the Mark Armitage, Financial Secretary Internet, must be obtained from the Editor. Gary H. Locklair, Recording Secretary Theodore Aufdemberge D. Russell Humphreys ISSN 0092-9166 David A. Kaufmann Jean K. Lightner Printed in the United States of America Michael J. Oard John K. Reed David Rodabaugh Ronald G. Samec Haec Credimus For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested on the seventh.—Exodus 20:11 Volume 46, Fall 2009 77 Shakespeare or Bonzo There’s an infinite number of Samuel Wilberforce (son of famed Brit- of typewriters would inevitably type a monkeys outside who want to ish abolitionist, William Wilberforce). great literary work such as Shakespeare’s talk to us about this script for To digress for a moment, during this Hamlet (e.g., see Dembski, 1996). Ac- debate Wilberforce chided Huxley with cordingly, some have later claimed that Hamlet they’ve worked out. the question of whether Huxley’s ape an- in offering this analogy, Huxley scored —The Hitchhikers’ cestry was on his mother’s side or father’s a smashing victory in the debate and side. Huxley is said to have responded cast Darwin’s claims as acceptable to Guide to the Galaxy that he would rather be descended from the British scientific community—very an ape than from a man who misused impressive for such a silly analogy. Again, his intelligence to hinder humble seek- this alleged response may be more a re- “It was, I think, Huxley, who said that six ers of the truth (e.g., see Quimby, 1965, flection of people’s superficial logic than monkeys, set to strum unintelligently on for a retelling of Huxley’s response). on the rationale of the actual argument. typewriters for millions of millions of His response has been credited with However, it is unlikely that Huxley years, would be bound in time to write energizing the scientific community in presented the monkey analogy at this all the books in the British Museum” support of Darwinism. However, I would debate. Although the concept of the (Jeans, 1930, p. 4). Thus goes a version challenge anyone to demonstrate to me typewriter dates to the eighteenth cen- of one of the most popular analogies of that Huxley could ever be considered a tury, by 1860 typewriters still were not evolution. Other versions involve much “humble seeker of the truth.” I also find sufficiently functional for the purposes larger groups of monkeys typing differ- it interesting that such a superficial and of the analogy. There is also no docu- ent literary compositions, such as the rather flippant response would suppos- mentation that Huxley made such an encyclopedia Britannica or the works edly have had such a profound effect argument during the debate. In fact, he of Shakespeare. (or even be credited with having such is reported to have once said that “the As with the above quote, the monkey an effect). This claim actually may be scientific imagination always restrains analogy is often credited to T.H. Huxley. a reflection of the superficial thinking itself within the limits of probability.” A contemporary of Charles Darwin, that people often use when evaluating While I do not personally give Huxley his staunch defense of Darwin’s ideas evolutionary teaching. credit for seeing how this statement earned him the nickname “Darwin’s Also, by some accounts, during this contradicts the monkey analogy; in point Bulldog.” An outspoken nineteenth-cen- debate Huxley challenged that, given of fact, there is little evidence that he tury atheist (or agnostic, as he preferred enough time and enough opportunity, ever proposed this analogy during his to be identified), Huxley found Darwin’s random events could achieve the type entire career. ideas of evolution to be a great comfort of biological transformation required by The origin of a “random system” for his agnosticism. Surprise, surprise. Darwinism. To support this argument, analogy can be dated possibly to the More specifically, the origin of the he is alleged to have used the analogy (or Greek philosopher Aristotle. In his De monkey analogy is often linked with the one form of it) that an infinite number Generatione et Corruptione, Aristotle 1860 debate between Huxley and Bishop of monkeys typing on an infinite number attempts to describe how the world may 78 Creation Research Society Quarterly have arisen out of random combinations ries a distinct influence of extreme nine- well as rationality). And evolutionists of atoms. Some form of a “random sys- teenth-century materialism, including call this science? tem” analogy had become popularized the imagery of “the proverbial monkey Putting flesh and bone to the mon- enough by the first century BC that at the typewriter, hitting by pure chance key analogy, a 2002 study by researchers Roman philosopher Cicero attacked on the proper keys to produce a Shake- from the University of Plymouth (UK) the claim. speare sonnet.” In the early twentieth used six Macaques at a local zoo. For He who believes this may as well century, Jeans (1930) promoted the one month a computer keyboard was believe that if a great quantity of the analogy by claiming that placed in these primates’ pen, and their one-and-twenty letters, composed if we examine the last page which a resulting keystrokes were recorded. Over either of gold or any other matter, particular monkey had typed, and the course of this study, the Macaques were thrown upon the ground, they found that it had chanced, in its produced five pages of letters, mostly would fall into such order as legibly blind strumming, to type a Shake- repeats of single letters (esp. the letter to form the Annals of Ennius. I speare sonnet, we should rightly re- S), but they failed to type a single three- doubt whether fortune could make gard the occurrence as a remarkable letter word. (The entire transcript of the a single verse of them (Cicero, 1877 accident, but if we looked through primates’ “composition” can be found translation). all the millions of pages the monkeys at http://www.vivaria.net/experiments/ It is not known exactly when “typing had turned off in untold millions of notes/publication/NOTES_EN.pdf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 2003 SOCIETY
    ISSN 0739-4934 NEWSLETTER HISTORY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 32 NUMBER 4 October 2003 SOCIETY those with no interest in botany, the simple beauty of the glass is enough. Natural History Delights in Cambridge From modern-life in glass to long-ago life, it’s only a short walk. The museum houses ant to discuss dinosaurs, explore microfossils of some of the Earth’s earliest life Wancient civilizations, learn wild- forms, as well as fossil fish and dinosaurs – flower gardening, or study endangered such as the second ever described Triceratops, species? If variety is the spice of life, then and the world’s only mounted Kronosaurus, a the twenty-one million specimens at the 42-foot-long prehistoric marine reptile. Harvard Museum of Natural History show a Among its 90,000 zoological specimens the museum bursting with life, much of it unnat- museum also has the pheasants once owned urally natural. by George Washington. And many of the The museum will be the site of the opening mammal collections were put together in the reception for the 2003 HSS annual meeting. 19th century by “lions” in the history of sci- The reception begins at 7 p.m. Thursday, 20 ence, like Louis Agassiz. November, and tickets will be available at the Much of the museum’s collection of rocks and meeting registration desk. Buses will run from ores is the result of field work, but the museum the host hotel to the museum. houses not only that which has been dug up, but The Harvard MNH is an ideal spot for his- also that which has fallen out of the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Extraterrestrial Intelligence
    THE FRONTIERS COLLEctION THE FRONTIERS COLLEctION Series Editors: A.C. Elitzur L. Mersini-Houghton M. Schlosshauer M.P. Silverman J. Tuszynski R. Vaas H.D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active scientists in all areas to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, consciousness and complex systems – the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. Other Recent Titles Weak Links Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks By P. Csermely The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behaviour Edited by E. Voland and W. Schiefenhövel Particle Metaphysics A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality By B. Falkenburg The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time By H.D. Zeh Mindful Universe Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer By H. Stapp Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition By M. Schlosshauer The Nonlinear Universe Chaos, Emergence, Life By A. Scott Symmetry Rules How Science and Nature are Founded on Symmetry By J. Rosen Quantum Superposition Counterintuitive Consequences of Coherence, Entanglement, and Interference By M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi's Paradox-The Last Challenge for Copernicanism?
    Fermi’s Paradox – The Last Challenge for Copernicanism? Milan M. Cirkovi´c´ Astronomical Observatory Belgrade, Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia & Department of Physics, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovi´ca 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review Fermi’s paradox (or the ”Great Silence” problem), not only arguably the oldest and crucial problem for the Search for ExtraTer- restrial Intelligence (SETI), but also a conundrum of profound scien- tific, philosophical and cultural importance. By a simple analysis of observation selection effects, the correct resolution of Fermi’s paradox is certain to tell us something about the future of humanity. Already a more than three quarters of a century old puzzle – and a quarter of century since the last major review paper in the field by G. David Brin – Fermi’s paradox has generated many ingenious discussions and hy- potheses. We analyze the often tacit methodological assumptions built into various answers to this puzzle and attempt a new classification of the numerous solutions proposed in an already huge literature on the subject. Finally, we consider the ramifications of various classes of hypotheses for the practical SETI projects. Somewhat paradoxically, it seems that the class of (neo)catastrophic hypotheses gives, on bal- ance, the strongest justification for guarded optimism regarding our current and near-future SETI efforts. Key words: astrobiology – extraterrestrial intelligence – Galaxy: evolution arXiv:0907.3432v1 [astro-ph.EP] 20 Jul 2009 – history and philosophy of astronomy – observation selection effects If you do not expect the unexpected, you will not find it; for it is hard to be sought out and difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to UNDERMINE CARTER's ANTHROPIC ARGUMENT in ASTROBIOLOGY Milan M. Ćirković Astronomic
    GALACTIC PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM: HOW TO UNDERMINE CARTER'S ANTHROPIC ARGUMENT IN ASTROBIOLOGY Milan M. Ćirković Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Branislav Vukotić Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Ivana Dragićević Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We investigate a new strategy which can defeat the (in)famous Carter's “anthropic” argument against extraterrestrial life and intelligence. In contrast to those already considered by Wilson, Livio, and others, the present approach is based on relaxing hidden uniformitarian assumptions, considering instead a dynamical succession of evolutionary regimes governed by both global (Galaxy-wide) and local (planet- or planetary system-limited) regulation mechanisms. This is in accordance with recent developments in both astrophysics and evolutionary biology. Notably, our increased understanding of the nature of supernovae and gamma-ray bursts, as well as of strong coupling between the Solar System and the Galaxy on one hand, and the theories of “punctuated equilibria” of Eldredge and Gould and “macroevolutionary regimes” of Jablonski, Valentine, et al. on the other, are in full accordance with the regulation- mechanism picture. The application of this particular strategy highlights the limits of application of Carter's argument, and indicates that in the real universe its applicability conditions are not satisfied. We conclude that drawing far-reaching conclusions about the scarcity of extraterrestrial intelligence and the prospects of our efforts to detect it on the basis of this argument is unwarranted.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic Punctuated Equilibrium: How to Undermine Carter's Anthropic Argument in Astrobiology
    ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 9, Number 5, 2009 ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089=ast.2007.0200 Hypothesis Article Galactic Punctuated Equilibrium: How to Undermine Carter’s Anthropic Argument in Astrobiology Milan M. C´ irkovic´,1 Branislav Vukotic´,1 and Ivana Dragic´evic´ 2 Abstract A new strategy by which to defeat Carter’s ‘‘anthropic’’ argument against extraterrestrial life and intelligence is presented. Our approach is based on relaxing hidden uniformitarian assumptions and considering instead a dynamical succession of evolutionary regimes governed by both global (Galaxy-wide) and local (planet- or planetary system–limited) regulation mechanisms. Notably, our increased understanding of the nature of su- pernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and strong coupling between the Solar System and the Galaxy, and the theories of ‘‘punctuated equilibria’’ and ‘‘macroevolutionary regimes’’ are in full accordance with the regulation-mechanism picture. The application of this particular strategy highlights the limits of application of Carter’s argument and indicates that, in the real universe, its applicability conditions are not satisfied. We conclude that drawing far- reaching conclusions about the scarcity of extraterrestrial intelligence and the prospects of our efforts to detect it on the basis of this argument is unwarranted. Key Words: Astrobiology—Extraterrestrial intelligence—Galaxy: evolution—History and philosophy of science. Astrobiology 9, 491–501. An unflinching determination to take the whole evi- particular form at random epochs with respect to the dence into account is the only method of preservation characteristic timescale of the astrophysical environ- against the fluctuating extremes of fashionable opinion. ment (notably, the Main-Sequence lifetime of the con- sidered star).
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Julius Kaljuvee, Ivan Reinwald, and Estonian Pioneering Ideas on Meteorite Impacts and Cosmic Neocatastrophism in the Early 20Th Century
    Title: Julius Kaljuvee, Ivan Reinwald, and Estonian pioneering ideas on meteorite impacts and cosmic neocatastrophism in the early 20th century Author: Grzegorz Racki, Tõnu Viik, Väino Puura Citation style: Racki Grzegorz, Viik Tõnu, Puura Väino. (2018). Julius Kaljuvee, Ivan Reinwald, and Estonian pioneering ideas on meteorite impacts and cosmic neocatastrophism in the early 20th century. “BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin” (Vol. 189, iss. 3 (2018), Art No. 11), doi 10.1051/bsgf/2018011 BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin 2018, 189, 11 © G. Racki et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2018011 Available online at: www.bsgf.fr Julius Kaljuvee, Ivan Reinwald, and Estonian pioneering ideas on meteorite impacts and cosmic neocatastrophism in the early 20th century Grzegorz Racki1,*, Tõnu Viik2 and Väino Puura3,† 1 Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, Będzińska Str. 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland 2 Tartu Observatory, University of Tartu, Tõravere, 61602 Tartumaa, Estonia 3 Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Received: 15 January 2018 / Accepted: 5 July 2018 Abstract – The article comprehensively presents little known Estonian contribution to the recognition of first meteorite impact structures in Europe, related to works of Julius Kaljuvee (Kalkun; 1869–1940) and Ivan Reinwald (Reinwaldt; 1878–1941). As an active educator specialized in geoscience, Kaljuvee was the first to hypothesize in 1922 that Kaali lake cirque in Saaremaa Island, Estonia, was created by meteorite impact. Thanks to mining engineer Reinwald, this assumption was accepted since 1928 due to the exhaustive field and borehole works of the latter (also as a result of exploration by several German scholars, including renowned Alfred Wegener).
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi Paradox from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
    Fermi paradox From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the absence of evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence. For the type of estimation problem, see Fermi problem. For the music album, see Fermi Paradox (album). For the short story, see The Fermi Paradox Is Our Business Model. A graphical representation of the Arecibo message – Humanity's first attempt to use radio waves to actively communicate its existence to alien civilizations The Fermi paradox (or Fermi's paradox) is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extraterrestrial civilization and humanity's lack of contact with, or evidence for, such civilizations.[1] The basic points of the argument, made by physicists Enrico Fermi and Michael H. Hart, are: • The Sun is a young star. There are billions of stars in the galaxy that are billions of years older; • Some of these stars likely have Earth-like planets[2] which, if the Earth is typical, may develop intelligent life; • Presumably some of these civilizations will develop interstellar travel, as Earth seems likely to do; • At any practical pace of interstellar travel, the galaxy can be completely colonized in just a few tens of millions of years. According to this line of thinking, the Earth should have already been colonized, or at least visited. But no convincing evidence of this exists. Furthermore, no confirmed signs of intelligence elsewhere have been spotted, either in our galaxy or the more than 80 billion other galaxies of the
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropic Shadow: Observation Selection Effects and Human Extinction Risks
    Risk Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 10, 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01460.x Anthropic Shadow: Observation Selection Effects and Human Extinction Risks Milan M. Cirkovi´ c,´ 1∗ Anders Sandberg,2 and Nick Bostrom2 We describe a significant practical consequence of taking anthropic biases into account in deriving predictions for rare stochastic catastrophic events. The risks associated with catastrophes such as asteroidal/cometary impacts, supervolcanic episodes, and explosions of supernovae/gamma-ray bursts are based on their observed frequencies. As a result, the fre- quencies of catastrophes that destroy or are otherwise incompatible with the existence of observers are systematically underestimated. We describe the consequences of this anthropic bias for estimation of catastrophic risks, and suggest some directions for future work. KEY WORDS: Anthropic principle; astrobiology; existential risks; global catastrophes; impact hazard; natural hazards; risk management; selection effects; vacuum phase transition 1. INTRODUCTION: EXISTENTIAL RISKS clude global nuclear war, collision of Earth with a AND OBSERVATION SELECTION 10-km sized (or larger) asteroidal or cometary body, EFFECTS intentional or accidental misuse of bio- or nano- technologies, or runaway global warming. Humanity faces a series of major global threats, There are various possible taxonomies of ERs.(7) both in the near- and in the long-term future. For our purposes, the most relevant division is one These are of theoretical interest to anyone who based on the causative agent. Thus we distinguish: is concerned about the future of our species, (1) natural ERs (e.g., cosmic impacts, supervolcan- but they are also of direct relevance to many ism, nonanthropogenic climate change, supernovae, practical and policy decisions we make today.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Abandons Uniformitarianism?
    Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale Science and Mathematics Conference Papers School of Science and Mathematics 12-2017 What a Catastrophe!― Science Abandons Uniformitarianism? Lynden Rogers Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/sci_math_conferences Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Rogers, L. (2017). What a Catastrophe!― Science Abandons Uniformitarianism?. In L. Rogers (Ed.), The Biblical Flood: The Context and History of Seventh-day Adventist Understanding. Paper presented at Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, 9-10 September (pp. 137-180). Cooranbong, Australia: Avondale Academic Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Science and Mathematics at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Science and Mathematics Conference Papers by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 137 Chapter 5 What a Catastrophe!― Science Abandons Uniformitarianism? Lynden J. Rogers Introduction: the Uniformitarian Accusation Over the last century it has been frequently claimed by defenders of a traditional reading of Genesis that one of the main reasons why scientists are blind to data supporting a world-wide Noachian Flood is because geology is philosophically uniformitarian. By this it is implied that geologists regard the present as the only reliable key to the past and in order to explain geological history will invoke only those very slow, gradual processes which can be observed in operation today. While this accusation was voiced in the late nineteenth century it was not until 1902 that the young George McCready Price levelled this charge in recognisably scientific form.1 The argument changed very little over the next 70 years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREAT SILENCE the Science and Philosophy of Fermi's
    The Great Silence THE GREAT SILENCE The Science and Philosophy of Fermi’s Paradox milan m. ćirković 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Milan M. Ćirković 2018 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2018 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2017954178 ISBN 978–0–19–964630–2 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Postanje - Povezivanje Nauke I Biblije” (U PDF Formatu) Učinili Smo Besplatno Dostupnom Na Internetu, Za Ličnu POSTANJE (Nekomercijalnu) Upotrebu
    Arijel Rot Elektronsku verziju knjige “Postanje - povezivanje nauke i Biblije” (u PDF formatu) učinili smo besplatno dostupnom na Internetu, za ličnu POSTANJE (nekomercijalnu) upotrebu. - povezivanje nauke i Biblije - Ukoliko želite da nabavite ovu knjigu u štampanom obliku, poručite je telefonom, na broj 062/200-046 Izdavač Naslov originala: Or i gi Ns: Li Nki Ng sc i eNc e aNd sc r i pt ur e by ariel a. r oth Predgovor Neki smatraju pokušaj povezivanja nauke i Biblije nemogućim zadatkom. Ova knjiga dovodi u pitanje tu “nemogućnost”. Ovo je pokušaj da se pokaže da razdvojenost između nauke i Biblije nije ono što se često pretpostavlja da jeste, i da postoji razuman sklad između njih. u raspravama o istinitosti nauke i Biblije pažnja se često usredsređuje na neku posebnu temu, kao na primer: pitanje kako je život mogao nastati sam od sebe, ili pitanje autentičnosti izveštaja o stvaranju koji je zapisan u Bibliji. Međutim, pitanje porekla je veoma široko i bavi se počecima gotovo svega. Ovako kompleksan problem zahteva široku analizu i procenu. Ova knjiga je pokušaj da se dâ uvid u tu širu sliku. Često verujemo usko specijalizovanim stručnjacima koji veruju drugim usko specijalizovanim stručnjacima, od kojih su svi zasnovali svoj “pogled na svet” na preovlađujućim stavovima, a da nisu imali šansu da procene tu širu sliku koju mi tako često prihvatamo. suviše često izvlačimo preširoke zaključke iz jedne uske baze podataka, nesvesni da smo pristrasno isključivi. sociolog posmatra grad iz drugačije perspektive nego arhitekta, pa ipak, obojica vide celokupnu sliku. t rudio sam se da izvršim “specijalizaciju” na sveobuhvatniji način, procenjujući razna tumačenja na osnovu naučnih činjenica i na osnovu Biblije.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Ten Venus and Mars
    Q-CD vol. 2: Chaos and Creation, Ch. 10: Venus and Mars 255 CHAPTER TEN VENUS AND MARS From the brow of Zeus, sang the Greeks, sprang Pallas Athene -- fully armed and with a shout [1]. She was cometary Venus -- fiery-faced, owl-eyed, helmeted and horned, with a long gown and hair trailing behind. Meanwhile, in Mesopotamia the Akkadians were also chanting hymns to Venus, going here by the name of Inanna:[2] By night she sends out light like the Moon does. At noonday sends out light like the Sun does. The mistress of Evening whose largeness is until the limit of Heaven... The Holy light that fills the Heavens. Inanna who shines as far as the Sun. These words, along with the symbols of Inanna (Figure 31) part the curtains upon “a lady who needs no introduction to you,” as a master of ceremonies would say. Many scholars deny that it could happen; yet no astral event of the ancients was so well reported as the career of the glowing and devastating comet and proto-planet Venus [3]. For nearly a thousand years it raged through the heavens periodically, encountering first Earth, then Mars; then Jupiter; then Mars again. It periodically -- every half century -- threatened the Earth and sometimes repeated, less harshly, its first devastation of the planet. The age of Venusia lasted from about 1450 to 700 B.C. endured, that is, until the comet Venus lost its cometary appendages and became a hot, young planet circling the Sun for all the world like an ordinary planet is supposed to behave.
    [Show full text]