DOCSLIB.ORG

Fermi's Paradox

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fermi's Paradox View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals Serb. Astron. J. } 178 (2009), 1 - 20 UDC 52{37 DOI: 10.2298/SAJ0978001C Invited review FERMI'S PARADOX { THE LAST CHALLENGE FOR COPERNICANISM? M. M. Cirkovi¶c¶ 1;2 1Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia 2Department of Physics, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovi¶ca4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia E{mail: [email protected] (Received: May 23, 2009; Accepted: May 23, 2009) SUMMARY: We review Fermi's paradox (or the "Great Silence" problem), not only arguably the oldest and crucial problem for the Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence (SETI), but also a conundrum of profound scienti¯c, philosophical and cultural importance. By a simple analysis of observation selection e®ects, the correct resolution of Fermi's paradox is certain to tell us something about the future of humanity. Already more than three quarters of century old puzzle { and a quarter of century since the last major review paper in the ¯eld by G. David Brin { has generated many ingenious discussions and hypotheses. We analyze the often tacit methodological assumptions built in various answers to this puzzle and attempt a new classi¯cation of the numerous solutions proposed in an already huge literature on the subject. Finally, we consider the rami¯cations of various classes of hypotheses for the practical SETI projects. Somewhat paradoxically, it seems that the class of (neo)catastrophic hypotheses gives, on the balance, the strongest justi¯cation to optimism regarding our current and near-future SETI e®orts. Key words. Astrobiology { Extraterrestrial intelligence { Galaxy: evolution { His- tory and philosophy of astronomy If you do not expect the unexpected, you will not ¯nd it; for it is hard to be sought out and 1. INTRODUCTION: WHERE di±cult. IS EVERYBODY? Heraclitus of Ephesus (cca. 500 BC) Fermi's paradox (henceforth FP) presents ar- guably the biggest challenge for any practical SETI How many kingdoms know us not! acitivity as well as the least understood of "grand Blaise Pascal, Thoughts (cca. 1660) questions" posed in the history of science. As is well-known and established by the research of Jones (1985), the key argument follows a lunchtime remark What's past is prologue... of the great physicist, Enriko Fermi: "Where is ev- William Shakespeare, erybody?" First discussed in print by the Russian The Tempest, II, 1 (1610-11) space science pioneer Konstantin Eduardovich Tsi- olkovsky, and in the last decades elaborated in detail 1 M. M. CIRKOVI¶ C¶ by Viewing, Hart, Tipler and others (for detailed interstellar distances (Dyson 1960, Sagan and Walker reviews see Brin 1983, Webb 2002), the argument 1966, Freitas 1985, Harris 1986, 2002, Zubrin 1995, presents a formidable challenge for any theoretical Timofeev et al. 2000, Arnold 2005). In words of the framework assuming naturalistic origin of life and great writer and philosopher Stanislaw Lem, who au- intelligence. As such, this should worry not only a thored some of the deepest thoughts on this topic, small group of SETI enthusiasts, but challenges some Fermi's paradox is equivalent to the "absence of cos- of the deepest philosophical and cultural foundations mic miracles" or the Silentium Universi ("cosmic si- of the modern civilization. It is hard to conceive a lence"; Lem 1977, 1984). Following the classic review scienti¯c problem more pregnant and richer in mean- by Brin (1983), we may introduce "contact cross- ing and connection with the other "big questions" of section" as a measure of the probability of contact science throughout the ages. In addition, it presents { by analogy with introduction of cross-sections in a wonderful opportunity for public outreach, popu- atomic and particle physics { and reformulate FP as larization and promotion of astronomy, evolutionary the question why this cross-section in the Milky Way biology, and related sciences. at present is so small in comparison to what could Tsiolkovsky, Fermi, Viewing, Hart, and their be naively expected. followers argue on the basis of two premises: Schematically, Fermi's paradox can be repre- (i) the absence of extraterrestrials in the Solar sented as System ("Fact A" of Hart 1975), and (ii) the fact that they have had, ceteris spatiotemporal scales of the Galaxy + the absence paribus, more than enough time in the history of of detected extraterrestrial civilizations (+ additional Galaxy to visit, either in person or through their assumptions) ! paradoxical conclusion. conventional or self-replicating probes. Here, under spatiotemporal scales we include our Characteristic time for colonization of the Galaxy, understanding of the age of the Galaxy, the Solar according to these investigators, is what we shall call System and the ages (incompletely known) of other the Fermi-Hart timescale (Hart 1975, Tipler 1980): planetary systems in the Milky Way. The additional 6 8 assumptions can be further explicated as tFH = 10 ¡ 10 years; (1) additional assumptions = "naive realism" + nat- making the fact that the Solar System is (obviously) uralism + Copernicanism + gradualism + non- not colonized hard to explain, if not for the total exclusivity. absence of extraterrestrial cultures. It is enough for our purposes to content that this timescale is well- These assumptions are quite heterogeneous. By de¯ned, albeit not precisely known due to our ig- "naive realism" we denote the working philosophy norance on the possibilities and modes of interstellar of most of science (as well as everyday life), imply- travel. For comparison, the accepted age of the Earth ing that there is a material world out there, com- as an object of roughly present-day mass is (All`egre posed of objects that occupy space and have prop- et al. 1995) erties such as size, mass, shape, texture, smell, taste and colour.2 These properties are usually perceived correctly and obey the laws of physics. In the speci¯c 9 t© = (4:46 § 0:02) £ 10 years: (2) case of FP, the basic premise following from naive re- alism is that there are, indeed, no traces of extrater- The drastic di®erence between the timescales in (1) restrial intelligent presence detected either directly and (2) is one of the ways of formulating Fermi's or indirectly ("Fact A" of Hart 1975). We shall dis- paradox. In the next section, we shall see that there cuss below some of the hypotheses for resolving FP is still more serious numerical discrepancy in play, which directly violate this realist view; an extreme when we account for the distribution of ages of ter- example { but powerfully present in pop-culture { of restrial planets in the Milky Way. such naively anti-realist standpoint is a view that, Even more generally, we need not consider the contrary to scienti¯c consensus, some humans are in direct physical contact between an extraterrestrial contact with extraterrestrial visitors and are conspir- civilization and Earth or the Solar System (insofar ing with them (e.g. Barkun 2003). Naive realism and as we do not perceive evidence of extraterrestrial vis- naturalism (Section 4 below) are methodological as- its in the Solar System; however, this is still an act sumptions, usually used in any scienti¯c research. of faith, considering the volume of space comprising Copernicanism and gradualism are somewhat more our planetary system1). It is su±cient to consider speci¯c tenets, stemming more from our experiences a weaker requirement: namely that no extraterres- in the history of physical science than from the gen- trial civilizations are detectable by any means from eral epistemology. Copernicanism (often called the Earth at present. This includes the detectability of Principle of Mediocrity) in narrow sense tells us that astroengineering or macroengineering projects over there is nothing special about the Earth or the So- 1In view of this circumstance, it is occasionally suggested that we also need a Search for ExtraTerrestrial Artifacts (SETA) programs as well (Freitas and Valdes 1980, Arkhipov 1996, 1997). Although we neglect this possibility in the further consid- erations in this text it worth noticing that this is a special case of a more generally understood unorthodox SETI programs which we consider in the concluding section. 2Philosophical literature often calls this view direct realism or common sense realism. 2 FERMI'S PARADOX { THE LAST CHALLENGE FOR COPERNICANISM? lar System or our Galaxy within large sets of sim- ery of Earth-like extrasolar planets, envisioned ilar objects throughout the universe. In somewhat by the new generation of orbital observatories. broader sense, it indicates that there is nothing par- In addition, this relative wealth of planets de- ticularly special about us as observers: our temporal cisively disproves old cosmogonic hypotheses or spatial location, or our location in other abstract regarding the formation of the Solar System spaces of physical, chemical, biological, etc., param- as a rare and essentially non-repeatable oc- eters are typical or close to typical.3 Gradualism, currence, which have been occasionally used on the other hand, is often expressed as the motto to support skepticism on issues of extraterres- that "the present is key to the past" (with corollary trial life and intelligence. that "the past is key to the future"). This paradigm, ² Improved understanding of the details of emerging from geological science in the 19th cen- chemical and dynamical structure of the tury with the work of Charles Lyell { and expanding, Milky Way and its Galactic Habitable Zone through Lyell's most famous pupil, Darwin, into life (GHZ; Gonzalez et al. 2001, Pe~na-Cabrera sciences - - has been subject of the ¯erce criticism in and Durand-Manterola 2004, Gonzalez 2005). the last quarter of century or so. We shall return to In particular, the important calculations of this issue in Section 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modelling Panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 System
    October 13, 2017 Modelling panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 system James A. Blake1,2*, David J. Armstrong1,2, Dimitri Veras1,2 Abstract The recent ground-breaking discovery of seven temperate planets within the TRAPPIST-1 system has been hailed as a milestone in the development of exoplanetary science. Centred on an ultra-cool dwarf star, the planets all orbit within a sixth of the distance from Mercury to the Sun. This remarkably compact nature makes the system an ideal testbed for the modelling of rapid lithopanspermia, the idea that micro-organisms can be distributed throughout the Universe via fragments of rock ejected during a meteoric impact event. We perform N-body simulations to investigate the timescale and success-rate of lithopanspermia within TRAPPIST-1. In each simulation, test particles are ejected from one of the three planets thought to lie within the so-called ‘habitable zone’ of the star into a range of allowed orbits, constrained by the ejection velocity and coplanarity of the case in question. The irradiance received by the test particles is tracked throughout the simulation, allowing the overall radiant exposure to be calculated for each one at the close of its journey. A simultaneous in-depth review of space microbiological literature has enabled inferences to be made regarding the potential survivability of lithopanspermia in compact exoplanetary systems. 1Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL 2Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL *Corresponding author: [email protected] Contents Universe, and can propagate from one location to another. This interpretation owes itself predominantly to the works of William 1 Introduction1 Thompson (Lord Kelvin) and Hermann von Helmholtz in the 1.1 Mechanisms for panspermia...............2 latter half of the 19th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Defenses That Hurt Science ______By Avi Loeb on June 4, 2021
    Defenses That Hurt Science _______ By Avi Loeb on June 4, 2021 In the highlighted subtitle of a recent New-York Times Op-Ed, Bret Stephens stated: "Sometimes science is hurt most by those who think they are defending it". This sentiment resonates with many examples that go beyond the topic of his Op-Ed. Let me elaborate. When the nitrogen iceberg model was proposed recently to explain the weird properties of the first interstellar object `Oumuamua, it was immediately embraced by mainstream astronomers with a sigh of relief that the anomalous object was finally explained. We had never seen a chunk of frozen nitrogen floating within the Solar system before, and being detected first - `Oumuamua should represent the most common type of objects ejected by other planetary systems; but this was of little concern for the advocates. Shortly afterwards, my student Amir Siraj and I posted a paper showing that this model requires much more raw material of heavy elements than available in stars within the Milky Way galaxy. This was not a reflection on the previously noted abundance problem for interstellar objects, but a specific deficiency of the nitrogen model - which associates `Oumuamua with a fragment chipped off the surface of a Pluto-like planet around another star. The limited supply of nitrogen on exo-Pluto surfaces and the requirement that the interstellar journey would last just half a billion years - or else most of the nitrogen would evaporate, leads to a mass budget problem. But why should the mainstream worry about a fundamental drawback when the agenda is to sideline the weirdness of `Oumuamua? In another recent Op-Ed, Seth Shostak from the SETI Institute downgraded the scientific credentials of the anticipated report on Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), to be delivered by the Pentagon and various intelligence agencies to Congress this month.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture-29 (PDF)
    Life in the Universe Orin Harris and Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Spring 2021 c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 1 / 95 Overview Dating Rocks Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 2 / 95 Dating Rocks Zircon Dating Sedimentary Grand Canyon Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Dating Rocks Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 3 / 95 Zircon Dating Zircon, (ZrSiO4), minerals incorporate trace amounts of uranium but reject lead. Naturally occuring uranium: • U-238: 99.27% • U-235: 0.72% Decay chains: • 238U −→ 206Pb, τ =4.47 Gyrs. • 235U −→ 207Pb, τ = 704 Myrs. 1956, Clair Camron Patterson dated the Canyon Diablo meteorite: τ =4.55 Gyrs. c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 4 / 95 Dating Sedimentary Rocks • Relative ages: Deeper layers were deposited earlier • Absolute ages: Decay of radioactive isotopes old (deposited last) oldest (depositedolder first) c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 5 / 95 Grand Canyon: Earth History from 200 million - 2 billion yrs ago. Dating Rocks Life on Earth Earth History Timeline Late Heavy Bombardment Hadean Shark Bay Stromatolites Cyanobacteria Q: Earliest Fossils? Life on Earth O2 History Q: Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Cometary Panspermia a Radical Theory of Life’S Cosmic Origin and Evolution …And Over 450 Articles, ~ 60 in Nature
    35 books: Cosmic origins of life 1976-2020 Physical Sciences︱ Chandra Wickramasinghe Cometary panspermia A radical theory of life’s cosmic origin and evolution …And over 450 articles, ~ 60 in Nature he combined efforts of generations supporting panspermia continues to Prof Wickramasinghe argues that the seeds of all life (bacteria and viruses) Panspermia has been around may have arrived on Earth from space, and may indeed still be raining down some 100 years since the term of experts in multiple fields, accumulate (Wickramasinghe et al., 2018, to affect life on Earth today, a concept known as cometary panspermia. ‘primordial soup’, referring to Tincluding evolutionary biology, 2019; Steele et al., 2018). the primitive ocean of organic paleontology and geology, have painted material not-yet-assembled a fairly good, if far-from-complete, picture COMETARY PANSPERMIA – cultural conceptions of life dating back galactic wanderers are normal features have argued that these could not into living organisms, was first of how the first life on Earth progressed A SOLUTION? to the ideas of Aristotle, and that this of the cosmos. Comets are known to have been lofted from the Earth to a coined. The question of how from simple organisms to what we can The word ‘panspermia’ comes from the may be the source of some of the have significant water content as well height of 400km by any known process. life’s molecular building blocks see today. However, there is a crucial ancient Greek roots ‘sperma’ meaning more hostile resistance the idea of as organics, and their cores, kept warm Bacteria have also been found high in spontaneously assembled gap in mainstream understanding - seed, and ‘pan’, meaning all.
    [Show full text]
  • Fred Hoyle: Pioneer in Nuclear Astrophysics
    PERSONALITY Fred Hoyle: pioneer in nuclear astrophysics Fred Hoyle, who died in 2001, is best known as a cosmologist. But, as Simon Mitton relates, his career in physics began with the weak interaction and moved on to a crucial discovery in nuclear physics. Fred Hoyle, the great cosmologist, nuclear astrophysicist and contro­ versialist, was born 90 years ago in the beautiful county of Yorkshire in the north of England. Hoyle's first science teacher was his father, who supplied the boy with books and apparatus for chemistry exper­ iments. By the age of 15 he was making highly toxic phosphine (PH3) Later in life Hoyle seldom worked at a desk in a faculty building, in his mother's kitchen, and terrifying his young sister with explosions. preferring a comfortable armchair at home. (St John's College.) In high school he excelled in mathematics, chemistry and physics, and in 1933 won a place at Cambridge to study physics. time Hoyle tracked him down he had just returned from spending six On arrival at Cambridge he immediately demonstrated his fierce months in Rome with Enrico Fermi. Peierls immediately set Hoyle independence by telling his astonished tutor that he was switching the task of improving Fermi's theory of beta decay, published in from physics to applied mathematics. The future nuclear astro­ 1934. This led, in 1937, to Hoyle's first research paper, "The gen­ physicist foresaw that Cambridge mathematics rather than lab­ eralised Fermi interaction". oratory physics would give him the right start as a theorist. The In 1938 Paul Dirac, who had won the Nobel prize in 1933, country boy displayed an astonishing talent at mathematics, even became Hoyle's supervisor because Peierls had left Cambridge for by the highest standards of the university.
    [Show full text]
  • A Direct Communication Proposal to Test the Zoo Hypothesis
    Space Policy 38 (2016) 22e26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Space Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/spacepol Viewpoint A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis Joao~ Pedro de Magalhaes~ Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Room 245, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK article info abstract Article history: Whether we are alone in the universe is one of the greatest mysteries facing humankind. Given the >100 Received 3 March 2016 billion stars in our galaxy, many have argued that it is statistically unlikely that life, including intelligent Accepted 16 June 2016 life, has not emerged anywhere else. The lack of any sign of extraterrestrial intelligence, even though on a Available online 26 July 2016 cosmic timescale extraterrestrial civilizations would have enough time to cross the galaxy, is known as Fermi's Paradox. One possible explanation for Fermi's Paradox is the Zoo Hypothesis which states that Keywords: one or more extraterrestrial civilizations know of our existence and can reach us, but have chosen not to Active SETI disturb us or even make their existence known to us. I propose here a proactive test of the Zoo Hy- Astrobiology fi Fermi's Paradox pothesis. Speci cally, I propose to send a message using television and radio channels to any extrater- Messaging to extraterrestrial intelligence restrial civilization(s) that might be listening and inviting them to respond. Even though I accept this is METI unlikely to be successful in the sense of resulting in a response from extraterrestrial intelligences, the possibility that extraterrestrial civilizations are monitoring us cannot be dismissed and my proposal is consistent with current scientific knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 10 No 1, Winter 2004
    SearchLites Vol. 10 No. 1, Winter 2004 The Quarterly Newsletter of The SETI League, Inc. Offices: 433 Liberty Street The Date Equation PO Box 555 by David Grinspoon Little Ferry NJ 07643 USA Editor's Note: This delightful analogy on the Drake Equation is excerpted from Dr. Grinspoon's new book Lonely Planets, ISBN 0-06-018540-6, © 2003, Harper Collins Publishers, New York. Phone: (201) 641-1770 Facsimile: Say you are a single person going to a large dance party, and you would like to come away with a (201) 641-1771 date for the following weekend. Arriving in front of the house, you can hear the music pumping Email: and feel the bass rattling your gut. You are excited, but nervous as hell, so you decide to calm [email protected] yourself with some math. Before going inside, you try to calculate your chances of getting lucky. Web: You start by guessing the total number of people at the party. You notice that people are arriving www.setileague.org at a rate of three per minute. We'll call this rate of arrival R. People are leaving at roughly the President: same rate, but you realize that you can estimate the number of people inside if you know how long Richard Factor they are staying. Let's call this length of stay L. The number of people inside will be roughly R Registered Agent: times L. So, if people on average are staying for, say, one hundred minutes, there will be about Marc Arnold, Esq. three hundred inside.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2003 SOCIETY
    ISSN 0739-4934 NEWSLETTER HISTORY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 32 NUMBER 4 October 2003 SOCIETY those with no interest in botany, the simple beauty of the glass is enough. Natural History Delights in Cambridge From modern-life in glass to long-ago life, it’s only a short walk. The museum houses ant to discuss dinosaurs, explore microfossils of some of the Earth’s earliest life Wancient civilizations, learn wild- forms, as well as fossil fish and dinosaurs – flower gardening, or study endangered such as the second ever described Triceratops, species? If variety is the spice of life, then and the world’s only mounted Kronosaurus, a the twenty-one million specimens at the 42-foot-long prehistoric marine reptile. Harvard Museum of Natural History show a Among its 90,000 zoological specimens the museum bursting with life, much of it unnat- museum also has the pheasants once owned urally natural. by George Washington. And many of the The museum will be the site of the opening mammal collections were put together in the reception for the 2003 HSS annual meeting. 19th century by “lions” in the history of sci- The reception begins at 7 p.m. Thursday, 20 ence, like Louis Agassiz. November, and tickets will be available at the Much of the museum’s collection of rocks and meeting registration desk. Buses will run from ores is the result of field work, but the museum the host hotel to the museum. houses not only that which has been dug up, but The Harvard MNH is an ideal spot for his- also that which has fallen out of the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Seth Shostak
    Written Text for Congressional Testimony Advances in the Search for Life Seth Shostak, Senior Astronomer, SETI Institute 189 Bernardo Ave., #200, Mountain View, CA 94043, [email protected] It is no longer considered foolish to argue that biology could exist on some of the trillion other planets in our galaxy. Its discovery would produce a lasting change in our perceptions, demonstrating that life is not confined to our world. We would know that biology is not some sort of miracle, but a commonplace – an ubiquitous, cosmic infection. The discovery of intelligence elsewhere would be of even greater import, as we have always considered humans to be special, even the pinnacle of Creation. To learn that there are others out there – others whose cognitive abilities exceed our own – would be a discovery that would recalibrate how our species views itself. It would also have consequences that can be only vaguely gauged, in much the way that the discovery of the New World led to societal changes that were largely unpredictable at the time of its happening. However, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, known by the acronym SETI, has been pursued for more than a half century with no unambiguous, positive result. We haven’t found conclusive proof of any intelligent (or even unintelligent) life beyond the confines of Earth. Claims that our planet is being visited by alien beings, while popular with the citizenry, are not considered credible by most scientists. However, recent developments in both astronomy and technology are accelerating the speed of SETI searches, and it is hardly fantastic to suggest that we could find evidence of cosmic company within a few decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Extraterrestrial Intelligence
    THE FRONTIERS COLLEctION THE FRONTIERS COLLEctION Series Editors: A.C. Elitzur L. Mersini-Houghton M. Schlosshauer M.P. Silverman J. Tuszynski R. Vaas H.D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active scientists in all areas to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, consciousness and complex systems – the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. Other Recent Titles Weak Links Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks By P. Csermely The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behaviour Edited by E. Voland and W. Schiefenhövel Particle Metaphysics A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality By B. Falkenburg The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time By H.D. Zeh Mindful Universe Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer By H. Stapp Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition By M. Schlosshauer The Nonlinear Universe Chaos, Emergence, Life By A. Scott Symmetry Rules How Science and Nature are Founded on Symmetry By J. Rosen Quantum Superposition Counterintuitive Consequences of Coherence, Entanglement, and Interference By M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Biogenic Dispersion Inside Star Clusters with System Dynamics Modeling
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 12 October 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202010.0232.v1 Exploring Biogenic Dispersion Inside Star Clusters with System Dynamics Modeling Authors Javier D. Burgos. Corporación para la Investigacion e Innovación -CIINAS. Contact: [email protected] Diana C. Sierra. Corporación para la Investigacion e Innovación -CIINAS; Bogotá, Colombia. Contact: [email protected] Abstract The discovery of a growing number of exoplanets and even extrasolar systems supports the scientific consensus that it is possible to find other signs of life in the universe. The present work proposes for the first time, an explicit mechanism inspired by the dynamics of biological dispersion, widely used in ecology and epidemiology, to study the dispersion of biogenic units, interpreted as complex organic molecules, between rocky or water exoplanets (habitats) located inside star clusters. The 3 results of the dynamic simulation suggest that for clusters with populations lower than 4 M/ly it is not possible to obtain biogenic worlds after 5 Gyr. Above this population size, biogenic dispersion seems to follow a power law, the larger the density of worlds lesser will be the impact rate (훽.) value to obtain at least one viable biogenic Carrier habitat after 5 Gyr. Finally, when we investigate scenarios by varying β, a well-defined set of density intervals can be defined in accordance to its characteristic β value, suggesting that biogenic dispersion has a behavior of “minimal infective dose” of “minimal biogenic effective” events by interval i.e. once this dose has been achieved, doesn’t matter if additional biogenic impact events occur on the habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN to BE HABITABLE? 8:15 A.M. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 A.M. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome C
    Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE HABITABLE? 8:15 a.m. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 a.m. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome Chair: Stephen Kane 8:30 a.m. Forget F. * Turbet M. Selsis F. Leconte J. Definition and Characterization of the Habitable Zone [#4057] We review the concept of habitable zone (HZ), why it is useful, and how to characterize it. The HZ could be nicknamed the “Hunting Zone” because its primary objective is now to help astronomers plan observations. This has interesting consequences. 9:00 a.m. Rushby A. J. Johnson M. Mills B. J. W. Watson A. J. Claire M. W. Long Term Planetary Habitability and the Carbonate-Silicate Cycle [#4026] We develop a coupled carbonate-silicate and stellar evolution model to investigate the effect of planet size on the operation of the long-term carbon cycle, and determine that larger planets are generally warmer for a given incident flux. 9:20 a.m. Dong C. F. * Huang Z. G. Jin M. Lingam M. Ma Y. J. Toth G. van der Holst B. Airapetian V. Cohen O. Gombosi T. Are “Habitable” Exoplanets Really Habitable? A Perspective from Atmospheric Loss [#4021] We will discuss the impact of exoplanetary space weather on the climate and habitability, which offers fresh insights concerning the habitability of exoplanets, especially those orbiting M-dwarfs, such as Proxima b and the TRAPPIST-1 system. 9:40 a.m. Fisher T. M. * Walker S. I. Desch S. J. Hartnett H. E. Glaser S. Limitations of Primary Productivity on “Aqua Planets:” Implications for Detectability [#4109] While ocean-covered planets have been considered a strong candidate for the search for life, the lack of surface weathering may lead to phosphorus scarcity and low primary productivity, making aqua planet biospheres difficult to detect.
    [Show full text]