DOCSLIB.ORG

CANADA's SYSTEM of JUSTICE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CANADA's SYSTEM of JUSTICE SERVING CANADIANS C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ Published by authority of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Government of Canada by Communications Branch Department of Justice Canada Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8 www.canada.justice.gc.ca ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, 2005 Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Main entry under title : Canada’s system of justice Rev. ed. Text in English and French on inverted pages. Title on added t.p.: Le système de justice au Canada. ISBN 0-662-68904-6 Cat. no. J2-23/2005 JUS-645 1. Law – Canada. 2. Justice, Administration of – Canada. I. Canada. Dept. of Justice. II. Title : Le système de justice au Canada. KE444.C32 2005 349.71 C2005-980099-2E PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ SERVING CANADIANS C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ Note to reader: This booklet provides general information about Canada’s justice system. It is not intended as legal advice. If you have a legal problem, you should consult a lawyer or other qualified professional. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ CONTENTS Introduction . 1 What is the Law? . 2 • Why do we need laws? . 2 • What other goals do laws achieve? . 2 • Public law and private law . 3 Where Our Legal System Comes From. 4 • The common-law tradition . 4 • The civil-law tradition. 4 • Aboriginal traditions . 5 • Parliament. 5 Keeping the Law Up to Date . 7 • Law reform . 7 • Changing laws . 7 The Canadian Constitution . 8 • What type of government is described by our Constitution?. 8 • What is a federal system? . 9 Rights and Freedoms in Canada . 11 • The role of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 11 • What rights does the Charter protect? . 12 • Fundamental freedoms . 12 • Democratic rights . 12 • Mobility rights . 13 • Legal rights. 13 • Equality rights . 14 • Language rights . 14 • Minority-language educational rights. 15 • Aboriginal rights . 15 • Other rights. 15 The Judicial Structure . 16 • How the courts are organized . 16 • What do the federal courts do? . 16 • Provincial and territorial courts . 17 • Administrative boards and tribunals . 18 C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE I PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ Civil and Criminal Cases. 19 • How do civil cases proceed?. 19 • What happens at a civil trial? . 20 • Decisions in civil cases . 20 • How do criminal cases proceed? . 21 • What happens in a criminal trial?. 22 • Victims of crime. 22 • Decisions in criminal cases . 23 • Can a decision be appealed? . 23 • How does restorative justice fit in? . 24 • Youth justice . 24 The Role of the Public . 26 • What are our duties under the law? . 26 • Jury duty . 26 • Testifying in court . 27 • Knowing the law. 27 II C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ INTRODUCTION The law affects nearly every aspect of Another purpose of this booklet is to our lives every day. On the one hand, we suggest that we need to take a wider view have laws to deal with crimes such as of the law. Laws are often thought of as robbery or murder and other threats and commands, but they are more than that. challenges to society. On the other hand, A law balances individual rights with laws regulate common activities such as the obligations that people share as driving a car, renting an apartment, members of society. For example, when getting a job or getting married. a law gives a person a legal right to drive, it may also restrict that right Understanding the law, and the ideas with traffic laws, and make it a duty for and principles behind it, is every her or him to know how to drive. Canadian’s business. This booklet will help readers understand what the law is, Our legal system functions well when where it comes from, what it is for, and people both understand their legal rights how it operates. It does not give and live up to their legal responsibilities. complete answers to these questions, In fact, the basis of much of our law is but offers a brief outline of Canada’s common sense. But before we can create laws and the whole justice system. new laws or change old ones, we need to understand the basic principles of our legal heritage. C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE 1 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ WHAT IS THE LAW? Why we need laws Laws help to ensure a safe and peaceful society in which people’s rights are Almost everything we do has a set of respected. The Canadian legal system rules. There are rules for games, for respects individual rights, while at the social clubs, for sports and for the work- same time ensuring that our society place. Rules of morality and custom tell operates in an orderly manner. An essen- us what we should and should not do. tial principle is that the same law applies to everybody, including the police, Rules made by government are called governments and public officials, who “laws.” Laws are meant to control or must carry out their public duties change our behaviour and, unlike rules according to the law. of morality, they are enforced by the courts. If you break a law – whether you What other goals do like that law or not – you may have to laws achieve? pay a fine, pay for the damage you have done, or go to jail. In Canada, laws not only govern our conduct; they are also intended to carry Ever since people began to live together out social policies. For example, laws in society laws have been necessary to provide for benefits when workers are hold that society together. Imagine the injured on the job, for insurance when chaos – and the danger – if drivers just workers are unemployed, for health care, chose which side of the street to drive and for loans to students. on. Imagine trying to buy and sell goods if no one had to keep promises or fulfill Laws are also aimed at ensuring fairness. contracts. Imagine trying to hold onto By recognizing and protecting basic your personal property or even to keep individual rights and freedoms, such as yourself safe if there were no laws against liberty and equality, our laws ensure that robbery or assault. stronger groups and individuals do not use their powerful positions to take Even in a well-ordered society, people unfair advantage of weaker groups have disagreements, and conflicts arise; or people. the law provides a way to resolve disputes peacefully. If two people claim the same Our legal system, based on a tradition piece of property, rather than fight they of law and justice, gives Canadian society turn to the law and the courts to decide a valuable framework. The rule of law, who is the real owner and how the freedom under the law, democratic owner’s rights are to be protected. principles, and respect for others form the foundations of this important heritage. 2 C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ Public law and private law Private law, also called “civil law,” deals with the relationships between Laws can be divided into public and individuals. Civil laws set the rules for private law. Public law is concerned contracts, property ownership, the with matters that affect society as a rights and obligations of family whole. It includes criminal, constitu- members, damage to someone or to tional and administrative law. Public their property caused by others and so laws set the rules for the relationship on. A civil case is an action between between the individual and society or private parties, primarily to settle for the roles of different governments. private disputes. For example, if someone breaks a criminal law, it is regarded as a wrong against society as a whole. C ANADA’ S S YSTEM of J USTICE 3 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/9c01a1/ WHERE OUR LEGAL SYSTEM COMES FROM The common-law tradition cannot be found in any code or body of legislation, but exists only in past deci- Canada’s legal system derives from sions. At the same time, common law various European systems brought to is flexible and adaptable to changing this continent in the 17th and 18th cen- circumstances. turies by explorers and colonists. Although the indigenous peoples whom The civil-law tradition the Europeans encountered here each had their own system of laws and social The tradition of.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compatibility of the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons with Canada’S Legal Framework and Its International Human Rights Obligations
    ENDING STATELESSNESS STATELESSNESS ENDING Relating To e Status COMPATIBILITY Of Stateless Persons With Canada’s Legal OF THE Framework And Its International Human 1954 CONVENTION Rights Obligations A SPECIAL REPORT Ending STATELESSNESS W Y #IBELONG © United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2015 Researched And Written For UNHCR By Gregg Erauw ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMPATIBILITY OF THE 1954 CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF STATELESS PERSONS WITH CANADA’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ITS INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN FOR UNHCR BY GREGG ERAUW © United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2015 The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or UNHCR. COMPATIBILITY OF THE 1954 CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF STATELESS PERSONS WITH CANADA’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ITS INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 Background to the Report .................................................................................................................... 3 The Purpose of the
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba, Attorney General of New Brunswick, Attorney General of Québec
    Court File No. 38663 and 38781 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (On Appeal from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal) IN THE MATTER OF THE GREENHOUSE GAS POLLUTION ACT, Bill C-74, Part V AND IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL UNDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS ACT, 2012, SS 2012, c C-29.01 BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SASKATCHEWAN APPELLANT -and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT -and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MANITOBA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW BRUNSWICK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUÉBEC INTERVENERS (Title of Proceeding continued on next page) FACTUM OF THE INTERVENER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MANITOBA (Pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MANITOBA GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP Legal Services Branch, Constitutional Law Section Barristers & Solicitors 1230 - 405 Broadway Suite 2600, 160 Elgin Street Winnipeg MB R3C 3L6 Ottawa ON K1P 1C3 Michael Conner / Allison Kindle Pejovic D. Lynne Watt Tel: (204) 391-0767/(204) 945-2856 Tel: (613) 786-8695 Fax: (204) 945-0053 Fax: (613) 788-3509 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for the Intervener Ottawa Agent for the Intervener -and - SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION AND SASKENERGY INCORPORATED, CANADIAN TAXPAYERS FEDERATION, UNITED CONSERVATIVE ASSOCIATION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC., INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS TRADING ASSOCIATION, CANADIAN PUBLIC HEALTH
    [Show full text]
  • Expenditure Analysis of Criminal Justice in Canada
    Expenditure Analysis of Criminal Justice in Canada Expenditure Analysis of Criminal Justice in Canada Ottawa, Canada March 20, 2013 www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca 1 Expenditure Analysis of Criminal Justice in Canada The mandate of the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) is to provide independent analysis to Parliament on the state of the nation’s finances, the government’s estimates and trends in the Canadian economy and, upon request from a committee or parliamentarian, to estimate the financial expenditure of any proposal for matters over which Parliament has jurisdiction. Over the course of the last few years, Parliament has made it clear that criminal justice is one of its major legislative priorities. PBO has responded to this by providing expenditure estimates of various pieces of criminal justice legislation. This report follows from these prior reports, looking at the total expenditures associated with criminal justice over the past 11 years. This is the first multi-year study to be undertaken of the aggregate expenditures on criminal justice in Canada. While the Department of Justice and Statistics Canada have published estimates of criminal justice expenditures, they provided only point in time estimates (2008 and 2001, respectively). By contrast, this report estimates criminal justice spending in Canada for the federal, provincial, and territorial governments for the period of 2002 to 2012. Furthermore, this report is comprehensive in that it includes police capital and full youth justice (not just corrections) expenditures. This analysis serves as a starting point to support an understanding of the expenses of Canada’s criminal justice system and its components over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Law of Canada Student Edition
    Constitutional Law Of Canada Student Edition Wyatt usually chloridizing fecklessly or birles ghastly when semi Torin renormalizing aristocratically and revengingly. Unexplored and ranking Anurag Nazifies her harmonisation brocade or minglings spectacularly. Anaglyphic Wilburt foretastes that reportage disfeatured moronically and stalemated esthetically. Formerly known as constitutional law exchange student edition is researched; how i can. It has occurred with the constitution. It is constitutional law journal of canada supreme court of parliament of rules. Setting and constitutional law is their laws that canada student edition i can assert their legal work. Procedure pertaining to students have the law principles, canada dedicated to have jurisdiction. This is admissible as well it is a dominion of laws from decisions of prof. Though your constitutional courts. Curbside pick up enhances your own affairs of law of constitutional canada student edition of canada in this edition i get this guiding principle of parliament, signature and such as to its general rule, federalism and discussions of different court. But that law is constitutional law of laws that this edition of pei; and domestic lawand above. You continue with its publications. Please select some dimensions of canada justice in a constitution by one order even be. Your books you guess which provide a new edition of the federal court may see its rulings and individuals do not be admitted into french and negotiation, where our constitutional la. The Constitution of Canada A Contextual Analysis. The public power has now explicitly recognizes legal information. Make the constitutional matters of canada includes the book agency, unless a real one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of Canada and the Conflict of Laws
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons PhD Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2001 The onsC titution of Canada and the Conflict of Laws Janet Walker Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd Part of the Conflict of Laws Commons, and the Jurisdiction Commons Recommended Citation Walker, Janet, "The onC stitution of Canada and the Conflict of Laws" (2001). PhD Dissertations. 18. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd/18 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in PhD Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS Janet Walker A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Worcester College Trinity Term 2001 The Constitution of Canada and the Conflict of Laws Janet Walker, Worcester College Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Trinity Term 2001 This thesis explains the constitutional foundations for the conflict of laws in Canada. It locates these constitutional foundations in the text of key constitutional documents and in the history and the traditions of the courts in Canada. It compares the features of the Canadian Constitution that provide the foundation for the conflict of laws with comparable features in the constitutions of other federal and regional systems, particularly of the Constitutions of the United States and of Australia. This comparison highlights the distinctive Canadian approach to judicial authority-one that is the product of an asymmetrical system of government in which the source of political authority is the Constitution Act and in which the source of judicial authority is the continuing local tradition of private law adjudication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self-Determination in International Law Marc A
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 6 12-1-1979 The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self-Determination in International Law Marc A. Thibodeau Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Marc A. Thibodeau, The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self-Determination in International Law, 3 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 99 (1979), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol3/iss1/6 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Legality of an Independent Quebec: Canadian Constitutional Law and Self­ Determination in International Law I. INTRODUCTION Since the signing of the Treaty of Paris (Treaty) on February 10, 1763,1 which formalized the British position in Canada and in other lands on the North American continent,2 members of the French-Canadian community, 1. Definitive Treaty of Peace Between France, Great Britain and Spain, Feb. 10, 1763, Great Britain-France-Spain, 42 Parry's T.S. 320. The Treaty settled various territorial disputes at the conclusion of the War of 1756-63 (Seven Year's War). As part of the settlements, the King of France ceded to Great Britain all of its possessions in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiculturalism and Language Rights in Canada: Problems and Prospects for Equality and Unity Terrence Meyerhoff
    American University International Law Review Volume 9 | Issue 3 Article 6 1994 Multiculturalism and Language Rights in Canada: Problems and Prospects for Equality and Unity Terrence Meyerhoff Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Meyenhoff, Terrence. "Multiculturalism and Language Rights in Canada: Problems and Prospects for Equality and Unity." American University International Law Review 9, no. 3 (1994): 913-1013. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MULTICULTURALISM AND LANGUAGE RIGHTS IN CANADA: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS FOR EQUALITY AND UNITY Terrence Meyerhoff INTRODUCTION The Parliament of the United Kingdom enacted the Canada Act of 1982' upon request of the Canadian Parliament.2 The Canada Act is Canada's primary constitutional document and, for the first time, em- powered Canada to control its constitutional destiny? With that respon- * J.D., May 1994, Washington College of Law, The American University; M.A. 1989, University of California, Berkeley; B.A. 1986. University of California, Santa Cruz. I would like to thank Thomas 0. Sargentich for his generosity in commenting on earlier drafts of this article and my wife, Monica J. Lowry, for her assistance. 1. CANADA AcT, 1982, ch. 11 (U.K.). 2. See EDWARD MCWHINNEY, CANADA AND THE CONSTITTION 1979-1982: PATRIATION OF THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS 172-73 (1982) (providing text of the final resolution in which Canada requested the Parliament of the United Kingdom Parlia- ment to consent to the passing of the Canada Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Citizenship Laws
    cl CANADIAN CITIZENSHIP LAWS: TWO FACETS BY GUY TREMBLAY B.A., Universite Laval, 1967 Licencie en droit, Universite Laval, 1970. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of 4 MASTER OF LAWS in the Faculty of LAW We Accept this Thesis as conforming to the required standard* The University of British Columbia May, 1972 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada ABSTRACT This thesis purports to consider two related problems in Canadian citizenship laws. In the first chapter, a comparison is made between the American state citizenship and what could be called a provincial citizen• ship in Canada. In conclusion, it is asserted that there are more factors in the United States tending to standardiz the content of the citizenship status between the states than between the provinces in Canada. Consequently, insofar as this content is determined by the states or the provinces, it can be said that Canadian provinces have been recognized by the laws of the constitution much more leeway than the American states to grant to the people they consider as their citizens a particular status which is distinct from the one possessed by citizens of other provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Responsibility Crisis in Canada
    The Responsibility Crisis in Canada by Thomas S. Axworthy Over the last two years the federal government’s sponsorship programme has been the subject of a study by the Auditor General, the Standing Committee on Public Accounts and most recently by a Public Inquiry headed by Justice John Gomery. Central to all these studies have been questions of accountability and responsibility. This article argues that Canada needs to re-discover the ethic of responsibility. It also puts forth specific structural reforms for parliament, the public service, and the executive. ne of the core problems that the 2003 report of the sponsible and accountable for whatever went wrong OAuditor General, the hearings of the Public with it.”2 Accounts Committee, and the Gomery The pattern described by Franks to the Public Ac- Commission of Inquiry into the sponsorship scandal has counts Committee has generally been repeated in testi- revealed is the absence of any notion of responsibility1 mony to the Gomery Commission. One exception is from those in high positions. Testimony has unveiled former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, who told the Com- that senior public officials ignored several internal mission: “I regret any mistakes that might have been complaints about irregularities in awarding ad contracts. made in the course of this program, or any other govern- Political staff whose job it is to advise ministers involved ment program. As Prime Minister, I take ultimate re- themselves in policy implementation, the traditional sponsibility for everything good and everything bad that preserve of the public service. The Minister in charge of happened in the government.”3 Another is David Public Works, Alfonso Gagliano, denied liability Dingwall, the former Minister of Public Works, who ac- because he claimed that he lacked knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Alberta
    Government of Alberta Written Submissions to Senate Standing Committee for Aboriginal Peoples Bill C- 15: An Act respecting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Introduction Alberta is committed to a path of reconciliation and shared prosperity with Indigenous peoples. This path reflects the unique legal landscape in Alberta, which provides protection for the rights of Indigenous peoples within the context of our historical treaties, the 1930 Natural Resources Transfer Act (NRTA), Canada’s constitutional framework, and common law. Alberta has significant concerns about Bill C- 15: An Act respecting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Bill C-15) and is of the view that there must be greater clarity to enhance relationships and to avoid prolonged litigation. Instead of a Bill to promote reconciliation, the federal government has introduced one that will sow frustrations and deepen divisions among people in Canada. We already see the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (the UN Declaration) being raised in litigation across the country with varying interpretations being advanced. Bill C-15 as currently drafted further complicates the courts’ roles to resolve this existing litigation. Our concerns revolve around the lack of clarity in Bill C-15. Specifically, Alberta has advocated since prior to introduction of Bill C-15 that amendments are needed to clarify: - the legislation only applies to laws enacted by the federal government and not provincial laws
    [Show full text]
  • First Nations Legal Inheritances in Canada: the Mfkmaq Model
    I First Nations Legal Inheritances in Canada: The Mfkmaq Model JAMES (SAKEJ) YOUNGBLOOD HENDERSON BEFORE ANY IDEA OF "CANADA" EXISTED, there was the reality of a northern Atlantic to Pacific homeland of the Aboriginal peoples, as the source for all of their legal inheritances. The land was settled by the acquiescence of the First Nations, sometimes by treaties, often grudgingly by physical occupation, occasion- ally by martial force, and slowly by European immigrants creating colonial societies as enclaves within an Aboriginal world. Legacies of colonialism and racism have 1995 CanLIIDocs 130 allowed little understanding in modern Canada about the First Nations' legal inheritances. The establishment of a new post-colonial order in Canada in 1982, where inherent and treaty rights of the Aboriginal people were made part of the supreme law of Canada, has been a first fragile step toward the revitalisation of the First Nations' legal inheritances and to the maturity of Canada as a nation. In the formation of the Canadian identity, the Aboriginal societies have always exerted a profound but subtle influence on the non-Native immigrants and their man-made societies and laws. The knowledge base of the First Nations remains mostly in indigenous worldviews, languages and rituals. Learning them is an intimate process which takes time and patience. Not unlike learning a new language, there are no shortcuts to understanding the First Nations' legal inheritances. Our learning process, however, must take the non-Native beyond language, into the deep structure of another worldview. And before all else, one must be prepared to recognise that First Nations had their own legal systems, before the arrival of the Europeans, and that they still do.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evisceration of Liberty in Canadian Courts
    chapter nine The Evisceration of Liberty in Canadian Courts Karen Selick, Derek From, and Chris Schafer * The classical liberal philosopher, J.S. Mill, said of liberty: The only [liberty] which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good, in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. (Mill, 1859/1974: 72) Mill’s concept of liberty is powerful and robust. It protects the so-called “negative” freedom of individuals, permitting them to be self-determin- ing, free from state interference of any kind, unless it is to prevent harm to another. Unfortunately, this concept of liberty is almost completely foreign to Canadian constitutional law jurisprudence. Our courts are out of step with the classical liberal philosophical foundations of our own politi- cal system. In fact, the courts in Canada have eviscerated the concept of liberty. * Karen Selick, L.L.B., is the Litigation Director for the Canadian Constitution Foundation. Since her call to the Bar in 1978, she has practiced in the areas of tax planning, civil litiga- tion, wills and estates, and matrimonial law. Ms. Selick’s legal and public policy commen- tary has been published in the Globe and Mail, National Post, Lawyers Weekly, Canadian Lawyer, and other publications. Derek From, B.R.S., B.A. (Hon), J.D., is Legal Counsel for the Canadian Constitution Foundation. After graduating with a Bachelor in Religious Studies from Briercrest College, he completed a degree in philosophy at the University of Waterloo. As a musician who has worked with many different record labels in the last ten years, he is interested in copyright law.
    [Show full text]