DOCSLIB.ORG

Strasbourg, 9 April 2010 ACFC/SR/III(2010)005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strasbourg, 9 April 2010 ACFC/SR/III(2010)005 Strasbourg, 9 April 2010 ACFC/SR/III(2010)005 ANNEXES 2-6 TO THE THIRD REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 9 April 2010 Appendix 2 Information about national public associations registered and operating in subjects of the Russian Federation as of 01.01.2008 1 Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of international Code of inter-regional regional local national Subject of the Russian Federation Federal District national Region national public national public public public associations associations associations associations 1 the Republic of Adygeya the Southern Federal District - 1 9 2 2 the Republic of Bashkortostan the Privolzhsky Federal District 2 3 24 - 3 the Republic of Buryatia the Siberian Federal District - 2 14 7 4 the Republic of Altai the Siberian Federal District - 5 - 5 the Republic of Daghestan the Southern Federal District - 5 - 6 the Republic of Ingushetia the Southern Federal District 7 the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic the Southern Federal District 2 9 2 8 the Republic of Kalmykia the Southern Federal District 9 the Karachayevo-Cherkessian Republic the Southern Federal District 10 the Republic of Karelia the Northwestern Federal District - 33 8 11 the Republic of Komi the Northwestern Federal District - 1 10 1 12 the Republic of Mari El the Privolzhsky Federal District - 3 2 6 13 the Republic of Mordovia the Privolzhsky Federal District - 1 6 3 14 the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) the Far Eastern Federal District 12 24 15 the Republic of North Ossetia the Southern Federal District 19 10 16 the Republic of Tatarstan the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 35 17 the Republic of Tyva the Siberian Federal District 4 18 the Republic of Udmurtia the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 28 19 the Republic of Khakassia the Siberian Federal District 2 14 4 20 the Chechen Republic the Southern Federal District 21 the Chuvash Republic the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 11 10 22 the Altai Territory the Siberian Federal District 1 20 19 23 the Krasnodar Territory the Southern Federal District 44 80 24 the Krasnoyarsk Territory the Siberian Federal District 2 42 30 25 the Primorie Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 21 23 26 the Stavropol Territory the Southern Federal District 24 32 27 he Khabarovsk Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 2 17 24 28 the Amur Region the Far Eastern Federal District 14 5 29 the Arkhangelsk Region the Northwestern Federal District 10 4 1 Information was prepared based of data presented by executive authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation to the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation under survey “Information on activities of government bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation in the sphere of implementation of the state national policy and interaction with national public associations in2007”. 30 the Astrakhan Region the Southern Federal District 31 15 31 the Belgorod Region the Central Federal District 32 the Bryansk Region the Central Federal District 2 33 the Vladimir Region the Central Federal District 8 3 34 the Volgograd Region the Southern Federal District 2 21 14 35 the Vologda Region the Northwestern Federal District 7 36 the Voronezh Region the Central Federal District 22 10 37 the Ivanovo Region the Central Federal District 19 4 38 the Irkutsk Region the Siberian Federal District 24 41 39 the Kaliningrad Region the Northwestern Federal District 35 39 40 the Kaluga Region the Central Federal District 7 5 41 the Kamchatka Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 3 20 42 the Kemerovo Region the Siberian Federal District 29 19 43 the Kirov Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 7 7 44 the Kostroma Region the Central Federal District 7 9 45 the Kurgan Region the Ural Federal District 11 7 46 the Kursk Region the Central Federal District 4 5 47 the Leningrad Region the Northwestern Federal District 2 25 5 48 the Lipetsk Region the Central Federal District 4 1 49 the Magadan Region the Far Eastern Federal District 6 5 50 the Moscow Region the Central Federal District 7 51 the Murmansk Region the Northwestern Federal District 20 17 52 the Nizhni Novgorod Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 16 16 53 the Novgorod Region the Northwestern Federal District 6 2 54 the Novosibirsk Region the Siberian Federal District 1 13 33 55 the Omsk Region the Siberian Federal District 1 4 16 56 the Orenburg Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 30 79 57 the Oryol Region the Central Federal District 3 5 58 the Penza Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 7 14 59 the Perm Territory the Privolzhsky Federal District 19 38 60 the Pskov Region the Northwestern Federal District 61 the Rostov Region the Southern Federal District 14 8 62 the Ryazan Region the Central Federal District 1 2 7 4 63 the Samara Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 9 15 1 64 the Saratov Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 65 the Sakhalin Region the Far Eastern Federal District 25 14 66 the Sverdlovsk Region the Ural Federal District 29 46 67 the Smolensk Region the Central Federal District 15 7 68 the Tambov Region the Central Federal District 4 1 69 the Tver Region the Central Federal District 22 6 70 the Tomsk Region the Siberian Federal District - - 13 6 71 the Tula Region the Central Federal District 1 2 7 6 72 the Tyumen Region the Ural Federal District 1 20 2 73 the Ulyanovsk Region the Privolzhsky Federal District - 12 11 74 the Chelyabinsk Region the Ural Federal District 75 the Chita Region the Siberian Federal District - - 12 2 76 the Yaroslav Region the Central Federal District - 25 14 - 77 The city of Moscow the Central Federal District - 3 59 - 78 The city of Saint-Petersburg the Northwestern Federal District More than 200 national public associations 79 the Jewish Autonomous Region the Far Eastern Federal District - - 3 1 80 the Aginsk Buryat Autonomous District the Siberian Federal District - - 1 - 82 the Nenets Autonomous District the Northwestern Federal District - - 3 3 83 the Ust-Ordyn Buryat Autonomous District the Siberian Federal District According to information provided by the Khanty-Mansijsk Office of the Federal Migration Service in the Tumen Region, the Khanty- 84 the Khanty-Mansijsk Autonomous District the Ural Federal District Mansijsk Autonomous District and the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District, there were 65 national public associations registered on the territory of the autonomous district as of 01.01.2008 85 the Chukotka Autonomous District the Far Eastern Federal District 1 - 3 - 86 the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District the Ural Federal District 5 10 Appendix 3 Information about national public associations registered and operating in subjects of the Russian Federation as of 01.01.2009 2 Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of Code of international inter-regional regional local national Subject of the Russian Federation Federal District Region national public national public national public public associations associations associations associations 1 the Republic of Adygeya the Southern Federal District - 1 11 2 2 the Republic of Bashkortostan the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 0 28 - 3 the Republic of Buryatia the Siberian Federal District - 2 15 5 4 the Republic of Altai the Siberian Federal District - 6 - 5 the Republic of Daghestan the Southern Federal District - 1 4 6 the Republic of Ingushetia the Southern Federal District 1 7 the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic the Southern Federal District 2 1 12 2 8 the Republic of Kalmykia the Southern Federal District 8 9 the Karachayevo-Cherkessian Republic the Southern Federal District 1 29 4 10 the Republic of Karelia the Northwestern Federal District - 32 12 11 the Republic of Komi the Northwestern Federal District - 3 13 12 the Republic of Marij El the Privolzhsky Federal District 2 12 8 13 the Republic of Mordovia the Privolzhsky Federal District 7 2 14 the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) the Far Eastern Federal District 19 29 15 the Republic of North Ossetia (Alania) the Southern Federal District 19 9 16 the Republic of Tatarstan the Privolzhsky Federal District - - 25 18 17 the Republic of Tuva the Siberian Federal District 5 18 the Udmurt Republic the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 28 19 the Republic of Khakassia the Siberian Federal District 2 17 3 20 the Chechen Republic the Southern Federal District 2 3 21 The Republic of Chuvash the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 11 10 22 the Altai Territory the Siberian Federal District 1 24 17 23 the Krasnodar Territory the Southern Federal District 1 39 66 24 the Krasnoyarsk Territory the Siberian Federal District 2 37 36 25 the Primorie Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 20 28 26 the Stavropol Territory the Southern Federal District 1 23 55 27 the Khabarovsk Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 2 17 24 28 the Amur Region the Far Eastern Federal District 14 5 29 the Arkhangelsk Region the Northwestern Federal District 13 1 2 Information was prepared based of data presented by executive authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation to the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation under survey “Information on activities of government bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation in the sphere of implementation of the state national policy and interaction with national public associations in2008”. 30 the Astrakhan Region the Southern Federal District 29 24 31 the Belgorod Region the Central Federal District 3 32 the Bryansk Region the Central Federal District 2 33 the Vladimir Region the Central
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functioning of Political Aphorisms with a Future Meaning in the Media of the International and Russian Regional Languages
    Proceedings of INTCESS 2017 4th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences 6-8 February 2017- Istanbul, Turkey FUNCTIONING OF POLITICAL APHORISMS WITH A FUTURE MEANING IN THE MEDIA OF THE INTERNATIONAL AND RUSSIAN REGIONAL LANGUAGES Flera Ya. Khabibullina1*, Iraida G. Ivanova2 & Maria N. Pirogova3 1Asst. Prof., Mari State University, Russia, [email protected] 2Asst. Prof., Mari State University, Russia, [email protected]. 3Asst. Prof., Gymnasium n° 26 André Malraux, Russia, [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract The article is devoted to a research of problems of contact development of the international and Russian regional languages in the context of the European political discourse on the example of functioning of aphorisms with a future meaning. The expression of the category of future in aphoristic space of world and regional media of languages with different structure – French, Russian, Tatar and Mari – is studied. Special attention is paid to functioning of language / mass aphorisms for expression of the concepts "power" and "politician". The comparative description of proverbs and sayings, appeals, mottoes, slogans, clichés, symbols, quotes is carried out. The most represented aphorisms in a political discourse of the French, Russian, Tatar and Mari media are the aphorisms related to the following lexical semantic fields: foreign / domestic policy, state / country, state structures / services, institutions, parties and political movements, governing bodies, political system, authorities, heads of political structures, parties, movements and their members. Keywords: aphorism, political aphorisms, political discourse, future, power, politician, media. 1. INTRODUCTION Within the framework of functional approach, many researchers, such as M.A. Shelyakina, T.A. Sukhomlina, Y.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Finno-Ugrian Cooperation and Foreign Relations
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Eastern Finno-Ugrian cooperation and foreign relations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4gc7x938 Journal Nationalities Papers, 29(1) ISSN 0090-5992 Author Taagepera, R Publication Date 2001-04-24 DOI 10.1080/00905990120036457 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Nationalities Papers, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2001 EASTERN FINNO-UGRIAN COOPERATION AND FOREIGN RELATIONS Rein Taagepera Britons and Iranians do not wax poetic when they discover that “one, two, three” sound vaguely similar in English and Persian. Finns and Hungarians at times do. When I speak of “Finno-Ugrian cooperation,” I am referring to a linguistic label that joins peoples whose languages are so distantly related that in most world contexts it would evoke no feelings of kinship.1 Similarities in folk culture may largely boil down to worldwide commonalities in peasant cultures at comparable technological stages. The racial features of Estonians and Mari may be quite disparate. Limited mutual intelligibility occurs only within the Finnic group in the narrow sense (Finns, Karelians, Vepsians, Estonians), the Permic group (Udmurts and Komi), and the Mordvin group (Moksha and Erzia). Yet, despite this almost abstract foundation, the existence of a feeling of kinship is very real. Myths may have no basis in fact, but belief in myths does occur. Before denigrating the beliefs of indigenous and recently modernized peoples as nineteenth-century relics, the observer might ask whether the maintenance of these beliefs might serve some functional twenty-first-century purpose. The underlying rationale for the Finno-Ugrian kinship beliefs has been a shared feeling of isolation among Indo-European and Turkic populations.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 Amending for The
    L 340/70EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.12.2005 COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 amending for the second time Decision 2005/693/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in Russia (notified under document number C(2005) 5563) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/933/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, cessed parts of feathers from those regions of Russia listed in Annex I to that Decision. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (3) Outbreaks of avian influenza continue to occur in certain parts of Russia and it is therefore necessary to prolong the measures provided for in Decision 2005/693/EC. The Decision can however be reviewed before this date depending on information supplied by the competent Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 veterinary authorities of Russia. laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof, (4) The outbreaks in the European part of Russia have all occurred in the central area and no outbreaks have occurred in the northern regions. It is therefore no longer necessary to continue the suspension of imports of unprocessed feathers and parts of feathers from the Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December latter. 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22 (6) thereof, (5) Decision 2005/693/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Begins Selling Intervention Grain Russian Federation
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 2/2/2011 GAIN Report Number: RS1107 Russian Federation Post: Moscow Russia Begins Selling Intervention Grain Report Categories: Grain and Feed Approved By: Mary Ellen Smith Prepared By: Yelena Vassilieva Report Highlights: Sales of grain from the intervention fund will begin on February 4, 2011. By the end of June 2011 the Government plans to sell at the commodity exchange up to 2.5 million metric tons to livestock producers, feed and flour mills. The start-up price of grain sales will vary by types and by provinces, but the minimum is set at 6,000 rubles ($200) per metric ton. General Information: The Russian Government ordered sales of milling and feed wheat, food quality rye and feed barley from the Intervention Fund. Order No. 63-p of January 26, 2011, was posted on the Russian government web-site on February 1, 2011: http://www.government.ru/gov/results/13992/ which will allow up to 500,000 metric tons of grain to be sold every month until the end of June 2011, at the weekly auctions conducted by the Russian commodity exchange. The minimum price will vary by quality and location from 6,000 rubles ($200) to 7,535 rubles ($251). Grain will be sold to registered livestock producers and to feed and flour mills. The Ministry of Agriculture updated instructions for selling grain from the intervention fund and posted these instructions on the MinAg’s web-site on January 28, 2011: http://www.mcx.ru/documents/document/show/15180..htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Project Environmental Impact 63 5.1
    E1188 TRANSLATION FROM RUSSIAN Preparation stage for the Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Grant GEF PPG TF051241 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L R E P O R T Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur- Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Environmental Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized EIA Leader D.Biol. B.A. Voronov Public Disclosure Authorized Khabarovsk – February 2005 2 Summary Report: 125 pages, figures 4, tables 12, references 70, supplements 2 AMUR-SIKHOTE-ALIN ECOREGION, HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE FORESTS, MODEL TERRITORIES, RESERVES, FOREST FIRE MANAGEMNT, CONSERVATION, BIODIVERSITY Analysis and assessment of Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Goals: assessment of Project environmental impact and contribution to the implementation of the program on forest fire prevention, elimination and control in the Amur-Sikhote-Alin ecoregion. Present-day situation, trends and opportunities for developing a fire prevention, elimination and control system were in the focus of attention. Existing data and materials have been studied to reveal forest fire impact on environment as well as Project environmental impact. Project under consideration is aimed at improving current fire management system and strengthening protection of ecoregion forests from degradation, which make it extremely socially and ecologically valuable and important. 3 List of Specialists Senior researcher, C.Biol.Sc. A.L. Antonov (Chapter 3) Senior researcher, D.Biol. B.A. Voronov (Introduction, Chapters 2,5,6) Senior researcher, C.Agr.Sc. A.K. Danilin (Chapter 4) Senior researcher, C.Biol.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 6/17/2013 GAIN Report Number: RS1335 Russian Federation Post: Moscow Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector Report Categories: Livestock and Products Policy and Program Announcements Agricultural Situation Approved By: Holly Higgins Prepared By: FAS/Moscow Staff Report Highlights: Russia’s live animal imports have soared in recent years, as the Federal Government has supported the rebuilding of the beef and cattle sector in Russia. This sector had been in continual decline since the break-up of the Soviet Union, but imports of breeding stock have resulted in a number of modern ranches. The Russian Federal and oblast governments offer a series of support programs meant to stimulate livestock development in the Russian Federation over the next seven years which are funded at hundreds of billions of Russian rubles (almost $10 billion). These programs are expected to lead to a recovery of the cattle industry. Monies have been allocated for both new construction and modernization of old livestock farms, purchase of domestic and imported of high quality breeding dairy and beef cattle, semen and embryos; all of which should have a direct and favorable impact on livestock genetic exports to Russia through 2020. General Information: Trade Russia’s live animal imports have soared in recent years, as the Federal Government has supported the rebuilding of the beef and cattle sector in Russia. This sector has been in decline since the break-up of the Soviet Union, but imports of breeding stock have resulted in a number of modern ranches which are expected to lead to a recovery of the cattle industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Throughout
    Integrating SUSTAINABILITY THROUGHOUT Polymetal International plc Sustainability Report 2018 OVERVIEW HEALTH AND SAFETY EMPLOYEES ENVIRONMENT SOCIO-ECONOMIC APPENDICES Group CEO’s introduction We believe responsible and efficient mining can be a force for good for society. We aspire to meet this challenge and to continue to be a responsible and efficient company, ensuring our business delivers benefits for all our stakeholders. Successful year Investing for a sustainable future 2018 has been a successful year for Polymetal. We have In environmental stewardship, we continue to focus achieved our goals on production. We launched our on zero-harm principles when designing and operating flagship Kyzyl mine and advanced our project pipeline, while our mines. We have taken our first steps to introducing continuing to deliver shareholder value through dividends. renewable energy, especially in the regions that have no The reporting year saw equally important achievements access to the electricity grid. Welcome in sustainable development and excellent progress in integrating sustainability throughout our business. Increasingly, we’re shifting towards safer methods TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 of waste storage, such as the dry stack tailings In 2018, we were pleased to become the first and only management system. This significantly improves Russian company to join the Dow Jones Sustainability protection against the risk of dam failure, and eliminates This report covers Polymetal International’s Group-wide policies and Index. Our FTSE4Good ESG rating has improved and tailings runout. This has been implemented at Amursk activities at all our operations. It presents information on our performance we are now among the 7% most highly ranked listed POX, and we will further decrease Polymetal’s tailings for the reporting period 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018, and provides companies in the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Component of People's Quality of Life in Russia
    Studies in Business and Economics no. 14(2)/2019 DOI 10.2478/sbe-2019-0029 SBE no. 14(2) 2019 DIGITAL COMPONENT OF PEOPLE'S QUALITY OF LIFE IN RUSSIA PETROV SERGEY Novosibirsk State Technical University, Faculty of Business, Novosibirsk, Russia MASLOV MIKHAIL Novosibirsk State Technical University, Faculty of Business, Novosibirsk, Russia KARELIN ILYA Novosibirsk State Technical University, Faculty of Business, Novosibirsk, Russia Abstract: The term “people's quality of life” has not been given any widespread explanation in the context of society digital transformation. There are six attributes specified to characterize digital component of people's quality of life. Basing on official statistics data, subindices for the corresponding data blocks were computed. A mixed method to estimate the digital component of people's quality of life was used. Also, the Russian index of digital component of people's quality of life was defined for the whole country and for its federal districts. The results of computations allowed to characterize the changes in subindices within blocks and in the integral index covering eight federal districts and in Russia in the whole for the period of 2015–2017. Positive dynamics of the Russian index of digital component of people's quality of life was revealed with some fluctuations for different federal districts. Key words: Digital transformation, Index, Quality of life, Ranking, Federal districts of Russia 1. Introduction Digital transformation of economy involves all spheres of people and organizations activities. It suggests the alteration of technological paradigm, traditional markets as well as institutional structure of society, in which it is now necessary to consider interaction of formal and informal, market and non-market institutions as well as those corresponding to digital and non-digital processes etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Specifics of Cultural Space of the Khabarovsk Territory
    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 2021 14(6): 918–926 DOI: 10.17516/1997–1370–0770 УДК 008: 304.2+379.81 Specifics of Cultural Space of the Khabarovsk Territory Lidiya V. Sheremet’eva* Khabarovsk State Institute of Culture Khabarovsk, Russian Federation Received 26.03.2021, received in revised form 16.04.2021, accepted 21.05.2021 Abstract. The paper focuses on various activities of cultural institutions operating in the territory of the region. The methodological basis of the research is L. V. Nikiforova’s cultural expertise based on systematisation of the categories of «places» of cultural space. The paper is a preparatory stage of cultural expertise, which aims to thoroughly analyse the network of cultural institutions in general and to identify potential art- spaces for further detailed study. It provides a detailed analysis of the network of cultural institutions in Khabarovsk and an overview of the categories of cultural institutions in the administrative centers of all districts in the Khabarovsk territory. The source base of the study is the data obtained from the analysis of websites of cultural institutions, social networks, as well as the respondents’ personal surveys. Cultural institutions representing different forms of cultural activity have been roughly divided into ten groups. The result of the research is a perspective to identify institutions the activities of which can be evaluated in terms of belonging to the art-space format. Keywords: culture, society, region, cultural space, art-space, Khabarovsk, Khabarovsk Territory, research activities, cultural expertise, cultural institutions. Research area: 24.00.00 – сulturology. Citation: Sheremet’eva, L.V.
    [Show full text]