KENYA NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY Name of Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Publication date: 15th December, 2016 Country: Kenya Executing Agency: KENYA NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY Name of Project: MULTINATIONAL UGANDA – KENYA: KAPCHORWA – SUAM – KITALE & ELDORET TOWN BYPASS ROADS PROJECT: LOT 1: CONSTRUCTION OF ELDORET TOWN BYPASS Loan/Grant Number: 2000200001052-AfDB, 2100150037300-ADF Name of Tender: LOT 1:- CONSTRUCTION OF ELDORET TOWN BYPASS Lot Number & Name (If different from Tender): N/A Procurement mode: INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING Domestic preference (Yes or No): No Regional preference (Yes or No): No Borrower’s Tender Number: KeNHA/ 1473/2016 Date of receipt by the Bank of the draft Tender document: 26th August, 2016 Date of approval by the Bank of the Tender Document: 30th November, 2016 Tender issuing date: 15th December, 2016 Closing date of the Tender: 23rd March, 2017 Date of Tender opening: 23rd March, 2017 Date of receipt by the Bank of the Tender evaluation report: 25th April, 2017 Date of approval by the Bank of the Tender evaluation: 8th June, 2017 Name of the winning Bidder: China Wu Yi Company Ltd Nationality: China/Kenya Address: Nyangumi Road, Wu Yi office, P.O Box 49282-00100, Nairobi. Tel: 254715418108. Email:[email protected] Contract Award Price: 5,079,517,696.13 Contract Start date: TBN Contract Duration: 42 Months Summary of Scope of Contract Awarded: Construction of 32Km road, construction of 3No. interchanges, construction of 150m long bridge across Lemook swamp and construction of 2No. Lorry parking yards. Total Number of Bidders: 23 Page 1 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted Jiangxi Transportation Engineering Contrary to the provision of Section Group Corporation. III: Evaluation and Qualification 1426. Ganjiang Middle Avenue, Criteria sub clause 2.6 and Section Jiangxi Honggutan New District, IV: Bidding Forms, the bidder only Transportation Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, P.R.C filled FORM EQU but did not 7,863,885,925.00 7,823,311,700.20 Rejected Engineering China Tel: +254 0797 678 559 demonstrated ownership of the key Group Email: [email protected] equipment required. The committee Corporation was therefore not able to verify the bidder’s capacity to provide adequate equipment for the assignment P. O Box 33900, Dubai, UAE The bidder did not provide Tel: +971 50 107 2560. Breakdown of Unit prices as per Email: [email protected] provisions of Section IV: Bidding Forms Al Naboolah Rejected In Form PER 1 the bidder provided Contracting UAE 8,289,692,428.00 8,244,065,750.85 for a Mr. Mohammad RehmanAbdul Company Ltd as Site Engineer/ Drainage and Structures, however, in Form PER 2, the CV provided for the corresponding position is that of a Mr.Anil Kumar Vidyadhram. 4 Beifengwo, Haidian District, Beijing, Bidder did not provide evidence of China Civil China. Engineering Rejected access to line of credit in accordance China Tel: +86 10 51848254/ +84-10- 6,104,651,282.42 6,203,553,447.92 with Section III: Evaluation and Construction 63265613. Corporation Qualification Criteria sub-factor [email protected] 2.3.3 (Form FIN-3.3). Page 2 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted No. 76 Nanlian Road Whereas the bidder acknowledged Nanchang Jiangxi China. receipt of Addendum No. 1, the bidder did not take into account Bill Zhongmei First Gate of Mtito Andie Rd, off Lenana China/ Rejected of Quantities amendments issued via Engineering Rd Kilimani, 6,010,045,363.53 5,992,264,079.51 Kenya the said Addendum and did not attach Group Ltd P.O Box 104507-00101, Nairobi appendix to bill item 1.24. The Tel: 0707 950 405 bidder’s BoQ was therefore Email: [email protected] considered incomplete. P.O Box 28066, Kitwe Zambia. Whereas the bidder has filled in Form Tel: 097854920. FIN-3.2, he has not provided the Email: [email protected] amount in US$ equivalent as per Section III: Evaluation and Qualification sub-factor 2.3.2(Average Annual Turnover) and Zambian Section IV (Bidding Forms). Nonferous Metals Rejected In accordance with Section III: Zambia 7,303,181,728.00 6,566,928,784.79 Exploration & Evaluation and Qualification Criteria Construction sub-factor 2.3.3 (Form FIN-3.3), the Co. Ltd Bidder did not provide evidence of access to line of credit Contrary to provisions of Section III: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria (Form CCC – Current Contract Commitments/Works in Progress) sub-factor 2.3.3, the bidder did not Page 3 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted provide Form CCC. The bidder did not provide table of Adjustment data (Table A for local currency, B for foreign currency & Alternate A/B for summary of payment currencies of the Bidding Forms). The bidder’s Letter of bid was not on the letter head as per instructions on Letter of Bid in Section IV of the Bid document. In his letter of Bid, the bidder deleted “in accordance with ITB 4.2” in sub- clause (i) and replaced modified sub- clause (k) by replacing “ineligible by the bank” with “ineligible with ZPPA”. In accordance with ITB 12, in view of the aforementioned omission and alteration, the committee considered Letter of bid to have been modified by the bidder The bidder’s bid documents were not signed by the holder of power of attorney as per ITB 20.2. Page 4 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted P. O Box 3049-00100 The bidder in his letter of bid 1st Floor of K-rep Centre, wood Avenue, acknowledged receipt of Addendum China State Nairobi Construction No. 1, however, the bidder did not China/ Tel: 0704532909, 0706424372. Rejected Engineering 5,551,471,216.00 5,545,551,207.74 take into account Bill of Quantities Kenya Email: amendments issued via the said Corporation [email protected] Ltd Addendum and did not attach appendix to Bill Item 1.24. Prabhatam, 1st Parklands Avenue, The bidder did not provide Form P. O Box 10748-00100, CON-2 as provided for Section III: Nairobi. Evaluation and Qualification Criteria Tel: +254 (020) 2658134, 2658135 sub-factor 2.2.3 (Pending Litigation) Email: [email protected] and section IV (Bidding Forms). The committee therefore was not able to confirm status of the bidder’s Parbat Siyani litigation. Construction Ltd in JV with Rejected Whereas the bidder acknowledged Kenya 9,353,547,626.00 9,353,547,626.00 Elite receipt of Addendum No. 1, the Earthmovers bidder did not take into account Bill Ltd of Quantities amendments issued via the said Addendum and did not attach appendix to bill item 1.24. The bidder’s BoQ was therefore considered incomplete. Contrary to provisions of sub-factor 2.5 of Section III of the Evaluation and Qualification Criteria Page 5 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted (Personnel) and section IV (Bidding Forms), the bidder did not provide Form PER-1 and PER-2.Credentials of proposed personnel provided were not in the prescribed format. The Bidder did not provide evidence of access to line of credit in accordance with Section III: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria sub-factor 2.3.3 (Form FIN-3.3). Instead, the bidder provided a letter from a Bank dated 2014. The committee considered the letter not current and unrelated to the tender/project. In accordance with provisions of Section III: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria (Form CCC – Current Contract Commitments/Works in Progress) sub-factor 2.3.3, the bidder did not provide Form CCC. The Bidder did not provide Form EXP 2.4.1 and Form EXP 2.4.2. The information provided on General and Specific experience were not in the prescribed format as per provisions of sub-factor 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 of Page 6 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted Section III of the Evaluation and Qualification Criteria (Personnel) and section IV (Bidding Forms) of the bidding document. The Bidder did not provide Form EQU for all the equipment. The provided list was not in the prescribed format as given in section IV (Bidding Forms) of the bidding document No. 219, Huanghe Road, Xigang, China Dalian District, International Dalian City, China Economic & China 6,719,608,542.60 6,931,578,478.95 Accepted Technical Neptune 3, Nine Planets Aprtment, Cooperative Kabarnet Road off Ngong Road, Nairobi. Group Co. Ltd Tel: 0711196666 Email: [email protected] 8th Caballero Andante St. Contrary to the provision of Section Tel: +34 91 449 3000. III: Evaluation and Qualification Email: [email protected] Criteria sub clause 2.6 and Section Corsan- IV: Bidding Forms, the bidder only Corviam- 8,202,383,000.00 8,115,783,682.73 Rejected filled Form EQU (except for Concrete Spain Construccion mixer truck, Bitumen Boiler and S.A Compressor) but did not provide evidence of ownership of most of the key equipment required. The committee was therefore not able to verify the bidder’s capacity to provide Page 7 of 14 Bid Reasons for Rejection Bid Price as Evaluated Price Name Nationality Address and City/State or Province Rejected Read-out (Kshs) (Kshs) Accepted adequate equipment for the assignment.