Download (1 Mib)(PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Native Orchid Society of South Australia
NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALIA NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA JOURNAL Volume 6, No. 10, November, 1982 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. SBH 1344. Price 40c PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian PRESIDENT: Mr J.T. Simmons SECRETARY: Mr E.R. Hargreaves 4 Gothic Avenue 1 Halmon Avenue STONYFELL S.A. 5066 EVERARD PARK SA 5035 Telephone 32 5070 Telephone 293 2471 297 3724 VICE-PRESIDENT: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven COMMITTFE: Mr R. Shooter Mr P. Barnes TREASURER: Mr R.T. Robjohns Mrs A. Howe Mr R. Markwick EDITOR: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven NEXT MEETING WHEN: Tuesday, 23rd November, 1982 at 8.00 p.m. WHERE St. Matthews Hail, Bridge Street, Kensington. SUBJECT: This is our final meeting for 1982 and will take the form of a Social Evening. We will be showing a few slides to start the evening. Each member is requested to bring a plate. Tea, coffee, etc. will be provided. Plant Display and Commentary as usual, and Christmas raffle. NEW MEMBERS Mr. L. Field Mr. R.N. Pederson Mr. D. Unsworth Mrs. P.A. Biddiss Would all members please return any outstanding library books at the next meeting. FIELD TRIP -- CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE The Field Trip to Peters Creek scheduled for 27th November, 1982, and announced in the last Journal has been cancelled. The extended dry season has not been conducive to flowering of the rarer moisture- loving Microtis spp., which were to be the objective of the trip. 92 FIELD TRIP - CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE (Continued) Instead, an alternative trip has been arranged for Saturday afternoon, 4th December, 1982, meeting in Mount Compass at 2.00 p.m. -
The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area. -
Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
10.1071/BT13149_AC © CSIRO 2013 Australian Journal of Botany 2013, 61(6), 436–445 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Comparative dating of Acacia: combining fossils and multiple phylogenies to infer ages of clades with poor fossil records Joseph T. MillerA,E, Daniel J. MurphyB, Simon Y. W. HoC, David J. CantrillB and David SeiglerD ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CSchool of Biological Sciences, Edgeworth David Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. DDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Materials used in the study Taxon Dataset Genbank Acacia abbreviata Maslin 2 3 JF420287 JF420065 JF420395 KC421289 KC796176 JF420499 Acacia adoxa Pedley 2 3 JF420044 AF523076 AF195716 AF195684; AF195703 Acacia ampliceps Maslin 1 KC421930 EU439994 EU811845 Acacia anceps DC. 2 3 JF420244 JF420350 JF419919 JF420130 JF420456 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth 2 3 JF420259 JF420036 JF420366 JF419935 JF420146 KF048140 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. 1 2 3 JF420293 JF420402 KC421323 JQ248740 JF420505 Acacia baeuerlenii Maiden & R.T.Baker 2 3 JF420229 JQ248866 JF420336 JF419909 JF420115 JF420448 Acacia beckleri Tindale 2 3 JF420260 JF420037 JF420367 JF419936 JF420147 JF420473 Acacia cochlearis (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. 2 3 KC283897 KC200719 JQ943314 AF523156 KC284140 KC957934 Acacia cognata Domin 2 3 JF420246 JF420022 JF420352 JF419921 JF420132 JF420458 Acacia cultriformis A.Cunn. ex G.Don 2 3 JF420278 JF420056 JF420387 KC421263 KC796172 JF420494 Acacia cupularis Domin 2 3 JF420247 JF420023 JF420353 JF419922 JF420133 JF420459 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 JF420269 JF420378 KC421251 KC955787 JF420485 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 KC283375 KC200761 JQ942686 KC421315 KC284195 Acacia deanei (R.T.Baker) M.B.Welch, Coombs 2 3 JF420294 JF420403 KC421329 KC955795 & McGlynn JF420506 Acacia dempsteri F.Muell. -
Winter 2011 Issue No 88
The Clematis Winter 2011 Issue No 88 BAIRNSDALE POSTAGE Victoria 3875 PAID Quarterly Newsletter of theBairnsdale & District Field Naturalists Club Inc A0006074C 20 1 BAIRNSDALE & DIST FIELD NATURALISTS CLUB INC. BUSHWALK TO OLD MAN HILL - MAY 2011 A0006074C List of Office Bearers for 2011 Eight members took to the hills along the Old Man Hill track at Sarsfield for the May bushwalk. It was a very pleasant, cool, but sunny day, just President: Pat McPherson ph. (03) 5152 2614 [email protected] ideal for walking. The terrain had long steep sections but with much Vice President: James Turner ph. (03) 5155 1258 [email protected] huffing and puffing by some of us we enjoyed the climbs. We had a Secretary: Fran Bright ph. (03) 5152 2008 [email protected] pleasant lunch stop overlooking a spectacular horse-shoe bend of the Treasurer: Margaret Regan ph. (03) 5156 2541 Nicholson River. Bird song was plentiful and we heard many lyre-birds Correspondence to: singing through their repertoire as we walked along through their territo- The Secretary, ries. P.O. Box 563, Many thanks to our leader, Noel, for taking us out for a lovely day in the BAIRNSDALE 3875 bush. Web Site: www.eastgippsland.com/bdfnc General meetings take place at: Noweyung Centre, 84 Goold Street Bairnsdale General meetings take place: as per program at 7.30pm sharp Committee meetings take place: at members homes, at 4.00pm (see program) Group Co-ordinators: Botanic Group: James Turner Ph. (03) 5155 1258 Fauna Survey Group: Jenny Edwards Ph. (03) 5157 5556 Bushwalking Group: Noel Williamson Ph. -
Bulletin of Natural History ®
FLORI'IDA MUSEUM BULLETIN OF NATURAL HISTORY ® A MIDDLE EOCENE FOSSIL PLANT ASSEMBLAGE (POWERS CLAY PIT) FROM WESTERN TENNESSEE DavidL. Dilcher and Terry A. Lott Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 1-43 2005 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE - The FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HiSTORY is Florida«'s state museum of natural history, dedicated to understanding, preser¥ingrand interpreting].biologica[1 diversity and culturafheritage. The BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA- MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is a peer-reviewed publication thatpziblishes.the result5 of origifial reseafchin zodlogy, botany, paleontology, and archaeology. Address all inquiries t6 the Managing Editor ofthe Bulletin. Numbers,ofthe Bulletin,afe,published,at itregular intervals. Specific volumes are not'necessarily completed in anyone year. The end of a volume willl·be noted at the foot of the first page ofthe last issue in that volume. Richard Franz, Managing Editor Erika H. Simons, Production BulletinCommittee Richard Franz,,Chairperson Ann Cordell Sarah Fazenbaker Richard Hulbert WilliamMarquardt Susan Milbrath Irvy R. Quitmyer - Scott Robinson, Ex 01#cio Afember ISSN: 0071-6154 Publication Date: October 31,2005 Send communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and manustfipt queries to: Managing Editor of the BULLETIN Florida MuseumofNatural-History University offlorida PO Box 117800 Gainesville, FL 32611 -7800 U.S.A. Phone: 352-392-1721 Fax: 352-846-0287 e-mail: [email protected] A MIDDLE EOCENE FOSSIL PLANT ASSEMBLAGE (POWERS CLAY PIT) FROM WESTERN TENNESSEE David L. Dilcher and Terry A. Lottl ABSTRACT Plant megafossils are described, illustrated and discussed from Powers Clay Pit, occurring in the middle Eocene, Claiborne Group of the Mississippi Embayment in western Tennessee. -
Eocene Fossil Legume Leaves Referable to the Extant Genus Arcoa (Caesalpinioideae, Leguminosae)
Int. J. Plant Sci. 180(3):220–231. 2019. q 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-commercial reuse of the work with at- tribution. For commercial use, contact [email protected]. 1058-5893/2019/18003-0005$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/701468 EOCENE FOSSIL LEGUME LEAVES REFERABLE TO THE EXTANT GENUS ARCOA (CAESALPINIOIDEAE, LEGUMINOSAE) Patrick S. Herendeen1,* and Fabiany Herrera* *Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, Illinois 60022, USA Editor: Michael T. Dunn Premise of research. Fossil leaves from the early Eocene Green River Formation of Wyoming and late Eo- cene Florissant Formation of Colorado have been studied and described here as two species in the monospe- cific extant genus Arcoa (Leguminosae, subfamily Caesalpinioideae). The single living species of Arcoa is en- demic to the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. The species from Florissant has been known since the late 1800s but has been incorrectly treated as several different legume genera. Methodology. The compression fossils were studied using standard methods of specimen preparation and microscopy. Fossils were compared with extant taxa using herbarium collections at the Field Museum and Smithsonian Institution. Pivotal results. The fossil bipinnate leaves exhibit an unusual morphological feature of the primary rachis, which terminates in a triad of pinnae, one terminal flanked by two lateral pinnae, all of which arise from the same point at the apex of the rachis. This feature, combined with other features that are diagnostic of the family Leguminosae or subgroups within it, allows the taxonomic affinities of the fossil leaves to be definitively deter- mined as representing the extant genus Arcoa, which is restricted to the Caribbean island of Hispaniola today. -
Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp. -
Life Cycle and Host Range of Phycita Sp. Rejected for Biological Control of Prickly Acacia in Australia † K
J. Appl. Entomol. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Life cycle and host range of Phycita sp. rejected for biological control of prickly acacia in Australia † K. Dhileepan1, C. J. Lockett1,A.Balu2, S. Murugesan2, D. J. Perovic1, & D. B. J. Taylor1 1 Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, Biosecurity Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 2 Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, India Keywords Abstract biological control, field host range, host specificity, leaf webber, non-target risk, Prickly acacia (Vachellia nilotica subsp. indica), a native of the Indian sub- Phycitinae continent, is a serious weed of the grazing areas of northern Australia and is a target for classical biological control. Native range surveys in India Correspondence identified a leaf webber, Phycita sp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a prospec- Kunjithapatham Dhileepan (corresponding tive biological control agent for prickly acacia. In this study, we report the author), Department of Agriculture and life cycle and host-specificity test results Phycita sp. and highlight the con- Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, tradictory results between the no-choice tests in India and Australia and Australia. E-mail: [email protected] the field host range in India. In no-choice tests in India and Australia, Phy- cita sp. completed development on two of 11 and 16 of 27 non-target test †Current address: Fujian Agriculture and plant species, respectively. Although Phycita sp. fed and completed devel- Forestry University Fuzhou, Fujian, China opment on two non-target test plant species (Vachellia planifrons and V. leucophloea) in no-choice tests in India, there was no evidence of the Received: October 9, 2014; accepted: insect on the two non-target test plant species in the field. -
ACT, Australian Capital Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Morphology, Geographic Distribution, and Host Preferences Are Poor
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/433359; this version posted October 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Research Article Morphology, geographic distribution, and host preferences are poor predictors of phylogenetic relatedness in the mistletoe genus Viscum L. Karola Maul1, Michael Krug1, Daniel L. Nickrent2, Kai F. Müller3, Dietmar Quandt1, and Susann Wicke3* 1Nees Institute for Biodiversity of Plants, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany; 2Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-6509, USA; 3Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Muenster, Huefferstr. 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany; Author for Correspondence is: Dr. S. Wicke, phone: +49 (0) 251 83 21644, email: [email protected] Research article containing 6,200 words, 4 color figures, 1 table; 6 additional figures and 7 additional tables are provided as supporting information. All raw data files and original phylogenetic trees are available from Mendeley Data. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/433359; this version posted October 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Abstract (250 words max.) 2 Besides their alleged therapeutic effects, mistletoes of the genus Viscum L. -
Wells Crossing to Iluka Road
Upgrading the Pacific Highway Warrell Creek to Urunga Environmental assessment Volume 2 – Working paper 1 Flora and fauna January 2010 Working paper 1 –Flora and fauna assessment 7. References Adam, P. 1995, Urbanisation and Transport. Pp. 55 - 75 in Conserving Biodiversity: Threats and Solutions, Ed. Bradstock, R. A., Auld, T. D., Keith, D. A., Kingsford, R. T., Lunney, D. & Siversten, D. P. Surrey Beatty and Sons & NPWS, Chipping Norton. Allison, F. R. & Hoye, G. A. 1995, Eastern Little Freetail Bat. In The Mammals of Australia (ed. by Strahan, R.). Australian Museum/ Reed Publications, Sydney. Anderson, J. R. 1993, ‘State of the Rivers’ Project – Report 2. Implementation Manual, A Report to Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Andrews, A. 1990, Fragmentation of habitat by roads and utility corridors: a review in Aust. Zool. 26, pp 130 - 141. ANPC (2004). Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia. 2nd Edition. Australian Network for Plant Conservation. ANSWW 2007. Atlas of NSW Wildlife: Department of Environment and Conservation (NPWS). ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000), ‘Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality’. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Ausroads (2001). Road Runoff and Drainage: Environmental Impacts and Management Options. Auld, B.A. & Medd, R.W. 1987, Weeds - an illustrated botanical guide to the weeds of Australia, Inkata Press: Sydney. Bali, R. (2005). Discussion Paper – Compensating for Edge Effects. Unpublished report prepared for the Roads and Traffic Authority, Sydney. Benwell, A. S. (2003). Yelgun to Chinderah Highway Upgrade Three Year Monitoring Report on Translocations of Threatened and Rare Rainforest Plant Species.