DOCSLIB.ORG

COAL ATLAS Facts and Figures on a Fossil Fuel 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COAL ATLAS Facts and Figures on a Fossil Fuel 2015 1 COAL ATLAS Facts and figures on a fossil fuel 2015 HOW WE ARE Second Edition COOKING THE CLIMATE 2 IMPRINT The COAL ATLAS 2015 is jointly published by the Heinrich Böll Foundation, Berlin, Germany, and Friends of the Earth International, London, UK Chief executive editor: Dr. Stefanie Groll, Heinrich Böll Foundation Executive editor: Lili Fuhr, Heinrich Böll Foundation Executive editor: Tina Löffelsend, Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland Managing editor: Dietmar Bartz Art director: Ellen Stockmar English editor: Paul Mundy Research editors: Ludger Booms, Heinrich Dubel Proofreader: Maria Lanman Contributors: Cindy Baxter, Benjamin von Brackel, Heidi Feldt, Markus Franken, Lili Fuhr, Stefanie Groll, Axel Harneit-Sievers, Heike Holdinghausen, Arne Jungjohann, Eva Mahnke, Tim McDonnell, Vladimir Slivyak Editorial responsibility (V. i. S. d. P.): Annette Maennel, Heinrich Böll Foundation This publication is written in International English. Second English edition, March 2017 Production manager: Elke Paul, Heinrich Böll Foundation Printed by Bonifatius GmbH Druck – Buch – Verlag, Paderborn, Germany Climate-neutral printing on 100 percent recycled paper. This material is licensed under Creative Commons “Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported“ (CC BY-SA 3.0). For the licence agreement, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode, and a summary (not a substitute) at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en. FOR ORDERS AND DOWNLOAD Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Schumannstraße 8, 10117 Berlin, Germany, www.boell.de/coalatlas Friends of the Earth International, Nieuwe Looiersstraat 31, 1017 VA Amsterdam, The Netherlands, www.foei.org Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland, Versand, Am Köllnischen Park 1, 10179 Berlin, www.bund.net/coalatlas INNENTITEL 3 COAL ATLAS Facts and figures on a fossil fuel SECOND EDITION 2017 4 INHALT TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 IMPRINT 18 HEALTH FINE DUST, FAT PRICE 6 INTRODUCTION Smoke and fumes from coal-fired power plants make us ill. They are responsible for hundreds 8 12 BRIEF LESSONS of thousands of deaths worldwide each ABOUT COAL AND THE WORLD year. Atmospheric and environmental pollution from coal costs billions in health expenses. 20 LABOUR DIRTY JOBS IN A DIRTY INDUSTRY 10 GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY Although coal production is still on the rise, the SUBTERRANEAN FORESTS sector is employing fewer people. Structural Coal is formed from vegetation at high change has spread to all continents. Nevertheless, temperatures and pressures, cut off mining underground remains one of from the air. The older the coal, the more the most dangerous occupations worldwide. carbon and energy it contains. Deposits are located in all continents. 22 HUMAN RIGHTS PUSHED DOWN AND DRIVEN OUT 12 HISTORY When the coal firms arrive, local people THE BEDROCK OF INDUSTRY can expect forced removal and repression. Coal is the fuel that powered the Industrial Voluntary standards are of little help. Revolution and the transformation of economies and societies over the last 24 PROTESTS two centuries. Its benefits have been A BROAD ALLIANCE WITH STAYING POWER huge – while the damage it has wrought was Around the world, people are fighting back ignored for too long. A switch to against the coal industry. They face repression, cleaner fuels now heralds the end of the harassment and violence – but sometimes coal era. they are successful. 14 GREENHOUSE GASES 26 SUBSIDIES SPOILING THE CLIMATE HIDDEN PAYMENTS, UNPAID BILLS Digging up coal and using it to generate The coal industry uses taxpayers’ money electricity churns out emissions that to keep its prices low – and it does not compensate intensify the greenhouse effect. Coal is one for the costs of climate change or disease. A brief of the biggest sources of climate change. look at the scale of the problem. 16 NATURE 28 FINANCE A CONTAMINATED FUTURE BIG PLAYERS BEHIND THE SCENES Open-cast mining destroys the landscape Digging mines, building power plants of both the pit and the surrounding and providing infrastructure cost billions. Many area. Efforts to restore these areas often fail countries cannot afford the investments; and the surface above the underground credit agencies, multilateral and private banks mines sinks. are glad to step in. 4 COAL ATLAS 2015 INHALT 5 30 PROFITABILITY 42 LOBBYING DEFLATING THE CARBON BUBBLE PAID TO PREVENT PROGRESS Successful climate policies mean that Wherever climate and energy negotiations coal is becoming a less valuable resource. This take place, the coal industry wants affects the companies that dig it up. to have their say. They often succeed. 32 CHINA 44 EMISSIONS TRADING BLACK FUEL, IN THE RED STRONG PLAYERS, FEEBLE INSTRUMENTS Change is under way for the world’s biggest Trading in pollution permits has blossomed coal consumer; consumption in 2014 was into a big business. The system has produced little down. Renewables are up. Coal-fired power benefit for the climate. Even so, the alternatives plants are working at less than full capacity. are barely discussed. 34 INDIA 46 CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE RICH IN COAL BUT POOR IN ENERGY PROBLEMS AT DEPTH Coal is an important part of India’s energy With the promise of “clean coal”, the industry mix, and consumption is rising quickly as the intends to store carbon dioxide underground. economy expands. Local production is not However, this method of dealing with enough: strong demand is attracting imports the climate crisis fails for both technical and from Australia and elsewhere. economic reasons. 36 UNITED STATES 48 THE ENERGY TRANSITION PAST ITS PRIME TURNING FROM BURNING – POWERING The US coal industry is losing market share UP RENEWABLES to gas and renewables. The nation’s dirtiest fuel The share of renewable energy in the global is giving way to cleaner alternatives. power mix is growing fast. Nations and corporations are switching over. However, 38 RUSSIA a complete shift away from fossil energy THE LAND WITHOUT DOUBT OR DEBATE is still not in sight. Coal is one of the dirtiest industries in Russia. Apart from hydropower, renewable energy is 50 EU ENERGY POLICY practically non-existent. Civil society groups ON TRACK, BUT AIMING TOO LOW that might push for more sustainable sources of The European Union’s climate policy power are few and far between. aims for lower emissions, lower consumption and an increase in renewable energy. 40 GERMANY The targets are achievable – but they ought to A TURNAROUND YET TO TURN be more ambitious. Germany is phasing out nuclear power and has come to rely more on coal for its electricity. Despite a steep rise in renewable energy, the use of coal is endangering Germany’s ambitious target to reduce its 52 AUTHORS AND SOURCES greenhouse gas emissions. FOR DATA AND GRAPHICS COAL ATLAS 2015 5 6 INTRODUCTION e have borrowed the Earth from By the middle of the century, our children.” This early environ- „ we will have to decarbonize our W mental movement slogan uses economy and society. simple words to express a central tenet of responsible, forward-looking policies: we must preserve the basis for the livelihood The coal boom has negative consequences of future generations. We must leave a for humans and nature that outweigh its better world to our children than the one economic benefits. Coal does not just kill the that we inherited. climate. In coal mines, terrible working conditions are rife. Accidents are common- Today, this principle compels us to do place. The environmental and health costs everything in our power to stop climate linked to the use of coal to generate electricity change and the damage it is causing. are enormous. Turning away from fossil (and This means that by the middle of the nuclear) fuels towards renewable energy century, we will have to decarbonize our can offer huge economic and social oppor- economy and society. A milestone on this tunities. It would create jobs and cut costs. A road is the phasing out of coal-burning. shortage of power can best be overcome by That is a huge challenge: coal was, and still the decentralized generation of energy from is, the fuel of industrialization and global renewable sources. economic growth. Switching to renewable energy and a more efficient economy A multilateral, binding climate agreement requires nothing less than a worldwide must give a clear signal to phase out fossil energy revolution. fuels. Companies that have made huge profits from fossil fuels should be made legally and A look at the statistics shows that global financially responsible for the damage they demand for coal is still rising. Growth have caused, and continue to cause. To speed will average a rate of 2.1 percent annually the transition, a reasonable price must be set through 2019. Just over half the for CO2 emissions. world’s usage takes place in China, which is by far the biggest consumer and We hope that this publication will spur the importer. King Coal also generates international campaign to phase out the 43 percent of Germany’s total energy. Even use of coal. We are particularly pleased with so, renewables have overtaken lignite, the efforts of many of our offices abroad to an especially climate-damaging type of produce editions of this atlas in local langu- coal, as a power source in Germany ages. We hope you will find this stimulating in 2014. The International Energy Agency reading. predicts that the use of coal to produce energy will decline in the medium term. Even in China, there are Barbara Unmüßig and Ralf Fücks signs that consumption has peaked. Board, Heinrich Böll Foundation 6 COAL ATLAS 2015 7 oal contributes more to climate Investment in coal-fired power change than any other energy source. „ diverts much-needed investment C Burning coal is the largest single away from renewable energy. source of carbon dioxide emissions in the world. Its extraction, processing and burning are inescapably dirty: the entire Africa, Friends of the Earth South Africa coal-to-energy process generates pollution fights against air pollution and health and destructive impacts for communities, problems caused by coal companies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coal Production
    Coal Production A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK 1 2 Summary of coal production entered on entity worksheets 3 Richard Heede 4 Climate Mitigation Services 5 22-May-13 6 7 8 1850s 1860s 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 9 Coal 10 11 12 13 1 Alpha Natural Resources, USA 14 15 2 Anglo American, UK 16 17 3 Arch Coal Company, USA 18 19 4 British Coal Corporation, UK 20 21 5 BP Coal, UK 22 23 6 BHP Billiton, Australia 24 25 7 China, Peoples Republic 26 27 8 Coal India, India 28 29 9 ConocoPhillips, USA 30 31 10 Consol Energy, USA 0.03 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0 32 33 11 Cyprus Amax, USA 34 35 12 Czechoslovakia 36 37 13 Czech Republic + Slovakia 38 39 14 ExxonMobil, USA 40 41 15 FSU (Former Soviet Union) 42 43 16 Kazakhstan 44 45 17 Kerr-McGee Coal (Anadarko), USA 46 47 18 Kiewit Mining Group, USA 48 49 19 Luminant, USA 50 51 20 Massey Energy, USA 52 53 21 Murray Coal, USA 54 55 22 North American Coal Corp., USA 56 57 23 North Korea 58 59 24 Occidental, USA 60 61 25 Peabody Energy, USA 62 63 26 Pittsburgh & Midway Coal (Chevron) 64 65 27 Poland 66 67 28 Rio Tinto, Australia 68 69 29 RAG (Ruhrkohle AG), Germany 70 71 30 Russian Federation (not including FSU) 72 73 31 RWE, Germany 74 75 32 Sasol, South Africa 76 77 33 Singareni Collieries Company, India 78 79 34 UK Coal, UK 80 81 35 Ukraine 82 83 36 Westmoreland Coal, USA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 84 85 37 Xstrata, Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • POTENTIAL PARADISE FOSSIL PLANT RETIREMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Muhlenberg County, Kentucky
    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Final EA Project Name: Potential Paradise Plant Retirement Project Number: 2018-34 POTENTIAL PARADISE FOSSIL PLANT RETIREMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Muhlenberg County, Kentucky Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee FEBRUARY 2019 To request further information, contact: Ashley Pilakowski NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 W. Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN 37902 Phone: 865-632-2256 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Related Environmental Reviews .............................................................................................. 4 1.4 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 5 1.5 Public and Agency Involvement ............................................................................................... 5 1.6 Necessary Permits or Licenses and Consultation Requirements ............................................ 6 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cerrejón Coal Mine Colombia
    Cerrejón coal mine Colombia Sectors: Coal Mining Active This profile is actively maintained Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: May 19 2021 Contact: Alex Scrivener, Policy Officer, Global Justice Now Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Coal Mining Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Website http://www.cerrejon.com/site/ About Cerrejón coal mine The Cerrejón coal mine in La Guajira, Colombia, is the largest in Latin America and one of the largest in the world. Its steady expansion since its founding in 1976 has led to the destruction of whole villages populated by local indigenous and Afro-Colombian people. The extracted coal is almost exclusively for export to rich countries with local people seeing few benefits. The mine is owned by three giant UK-listed mining companies: BHP Billiton, Anglo American and Glencore. All of which receive billions of pounds in finance from UK banks and pension funds. Roche, Chancleta, Tamaquitos, Manantial, Tabaco, Palmarito, El Descanso, Caracoli, Zarahita, Patilla. These are the names of just some of the communities that have been devastated or simply wiped off the map by the Cerrejón mining project. Latest developments Anglo American to exit from Cerrejon shareholding, BHP Group to follow Feb 25 2021 Glencore leaving, passing mining contracts to Republic of Colombia Feb 4 2021 Impacts Social and human rights impacts While the Cerrejón mining company's promotional material gives the impression that it is helping the displaced communities, the reality is that the mining company has used underhand tactics to buy off individuals and sow internal division within the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Last Chance for Coal Making Carbon Capture and Storage a Reality
    a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality foreword by Rt Hon Margaret Beckett MP Jon Gibbins & Hannah Chalmers David Hawkins Graeme Sweeney Jules Kortenhorst Linda McAvan MEP Alain Berger Ruud Lubbers Frances O’Grady Mike Farley Matthew Lockwood Ben Caldecott & Thomas Sweetman Keith Allott Karla Hill & Tim Malloch Sheryl Carter compiled and edited by Chris Littlecott This publication is part of Green Alliance’s climate change theme (www.green-alliance.org.uk/climatechange), which is kindly supported by Shell. Green Alliance’s work on the financing of CCS demonstration projects is kindly supported by BP. The views expressed in this publication remain those of the individual authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Green Alliance or its sponsors. Acknowledgments Many thanks to all those who have advised and assisted in the preparation of this publication, particularly Rebecca Collyer, Mark Johnston and Jesse Scott. Special thanks are due to Catherine Beswick, Karen Crane, Maureen Murphy, Rebekah Phillips and Faye Scott for their invaluable editorial input. a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality Edited by Chris Littlecott ISBN 978-1-905869-15-2 © Green Alliance 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Waste Associated with Closed Mines in England and Wales
    The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/10/14 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/10/14 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the The nature of waste associated Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. OS Topography © Crown with closed mines in England and Copyright. All rights reserved. BGS 100017897/2010 Wales Keywords Abandoned mine waste facilities; Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T England and Wales; mineral deposits; environmental impact; Contributor/editor European Mine Waste Directive. Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G Front cover Graiggoch Mine (SN 7040 7410), Ceredigion, Wales. Bibliographical reference Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T with contributions from Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G. 2010. The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/10/14. 98pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Environment Agency that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Energy Bill: Pre–Legislative Scrutiny
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre–legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012-13 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 24 May, 12, 19 and 26 June, 3 July, and 10 July 2012 Published on Monday 23 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Members Directory | World Coal Association
    Become a member Search Coal Reducing CO2 emissions Environmental protection Sustainable societies About WCA News & opinion Resources Members area Members Directory The World Coal Association is the global network for the coal industry. Information on all WCA members is available in this B E C O M E A M E M B E R directory. Corporate Member Anglo American Arch Coal Inc Aurizon Banpu BHP Billiton Bowie Resource Partners Caterpillar Global Mining China National Coal Group Glencore Joy Global Karakan Invest LLC Vostsibugol Mitsubishi Development Pty Ltd Orica Ltd Peabody Energy Rio Tinto Energy (MDP) Shenhua Group Corporation Limited Whitehaven Coal Limited Xcoal Energy and Resources Associate Member Andi Assocarboni Associação Brasileira de Carvão Association of British Mining Mineral Equipment Companies (ABMEC) China National Coal Association Coal Association of Canada (CAC) Coal Association of New Zealand Coallmp - Association of Uk Coal Importers Fossil Fuel Foundation German Coal Association (GSVt) Indonesian Coal Mining Association Iranian Mines & Mining Industries (APBI-ICMA) Development & Renovation Organization (IMIDRO) Japan Coal Energy Center (JCOAL) Minerals Council of Australia Mongolian Coal Association National Mining Association (NMA) Queensland Resources Council (QRC) Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey Svenska Kolinstitutet MOU Coal Utilization Research Council European Association for Coal and VGB Powertech e.V. (CURC) Lignite (EURACOAL) World Coal Association Helpful links Explore Email. [email protected] Reducing CO2 emissions F I N D U S O N Tel. +44 (0) 20 7851 0052 Platform for Accelerating Coal Efficiency Fax. +44 (0) 20 7851 0061 Carbon capture, use and storage Contact us About WCA T H E J O U R N A L O F T H E C O A L I N D U S T R Y Terms & Conditions Media information Cookie policy Unless otherwise specified, images courtesy of Accessibility Shutterstock © 2015 World Coal Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Fossil Plant to Comply with the CCR Rule Requirements
    Cumberland Fossil Fossil Plant Plant CUMBERLAND CITY,CITY, TENNESSEETENNESSEE QUICKQUICK FACTSFACTS OH IN IL WV KY MO VA TN NC AR SC MS AL GA EPA CCR RULERule Groundwater GROUNDWATER Monitoring MONITORING for 2019 Commissioning Date: 1973 This fact sheet summarizes groundwater monitoring conducted by Commissioning Date: 1973 This fact sheet summarizes groundwater monitoring conducted by TVA for the Output: 2,470 Megawatts TVACumberland as required Fossil Plant,by the as U.S. required Environmental by the U.S. Environmental Protection ProtectionAgency (EPA) Agency (16Output: billion 2,470 kilowatt-hours) Megawatts (16 billion Coal(EPA) CoalCombustion Combustion Residuals Residuals (CCR)(CCR) RuleRule. for The the 2019EPA calendar published year. the The EPA kilowatt-hours) published the CCR Rule on April 17, 2015. It requires companies operating coal- Number of homes powered: CCR Rule on April 17, 2015. It requires companies operating coal- 1.1 MillionNumber of homes powered: fired power plants to study whether constituents in CCR have been released to fired power plants to study whether constituents in CCR have been 1.1 Million groundwater from active, inactive and new CCR impoundments, as well as active Wet to Dry / Dewatered releasedand new CCR to groundwater. landfills. This fact sheet addresses the EPA CCR ConversionWet to Dry /Program: Dewatered Activities Rule groundwater monitoring only. underwayConversion Program: Complete The CCR Rule establishes multiple phases of protective groundwater monitoring for fly ash and gypsum. Bottom ash Inincluding addition baseline to ongoing sampling, groundwater Detection Monitoring monitoring and Assessment required under Monitoring. TVAdewatering Wide CCR tank-based Conversion solution Program Total Spend: Corrective action may be necessary at the completion of this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Disclosure Project 2011
    CDP 2011 Investor CDP 2011 Information Request Carbon Disclosure Project Centrica Module: Introduction Page: Introduction 0.1 Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization About Centrica Our vision is to be the leading integrated energy company in our chosen markets. We source, generate, process, store, trade, save and supply energy and provide a range of related services. We secure and supply gas and electricity for millions of homes and business and offer a range of home energy solutions and low carbon products and services. We have strong brands and distinctive skills which we use to achieve success in our chosen markets of the UK and North America, and for the benefit of our employees, our customers and our shareholders. In the UK, we source, generate, process and trade gas and electricity through our Centrica Energy business division. We store gas through Centrica Storage and we supply products and services to customers through our retail brand British Gas. In North America, Centrica operates under the name Direct Energy, which now accounts for about a quarter of group turnover. We believe that climate change is one of the single biggest global challenges. Energy generation and energy use are significant contributors to man-made greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a driver of climate change. As an integrated energy company, we play a pivotal role in helping to tackle climate change by changing how energy is generated and how consumers use energy. Our corporate responsibility (CR) vision is to be the most trusted energy company leading the move to a low carbon future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Box
    SO M O The Black Box Obscurity and Transparency in the Dutch Coal Supply Chain SOMO January 2012 (Updated March 2013) The Black Box Obscurity and Transparency in the Dutch Coal Supply Chain Every year more than 50 million tonnes of coal fl ow into the Netherlands, destined either for combustion in coal-fi red power plants in this country or for re-export to other European countries for electricity generation there. The capacity to generate electricity from coal in the Netherlands will more than double if the four new coal-fi red power plants currently being planned in the Netherlands go forward as envisioned. Much of that coal comes from countries like Colombia, Russia, and South Africa, where sub-standard social and environmental conditions often prevail. A lack of transparency about the origin of coal used in the Netherlands has allowed the electricity companies responsible for importing irresponsibly mined coal to avoid public and political pressure for improving conditions in their supply chain. Increasing transparency in the coal supply chain is an important fi rst step toward improving the sub-standard conditions at coal mines around the world. This report details the functioning of the coal supply chain and provides a thorough overview of all publicly available information on the origin of coal used in Dutch power plants. The report identifi es critical gaps in public knowledge resulting from the lack of transparency provided by electricity companies operating in the Netherlands and analyses whether the degree of transparency provided by electricity companies is in line with international standards. The Black Box Obscurity and Transparency in the Dutch Coal Supply Chain SOMO Amsterdam, January 2012 (Updated March 2013) SOMO is an independent, non-profit research organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • (2019) EPA's Final
    Attachment to Part B Comments of Earthjustice et al., EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0173 Assessment Monitoring Outcomes (2019) EPA’s Final Coal Ash Rule, 40 C.F.R. § 257.94(e)(3), requires the owners or operators of existing Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) units to prepare a notification stating that an assessment monitoring program has been established if it is determined that a statistically significant increase over background levels for one or more of the constituents listed in appendix III of the CCR Rule has occurred, without an alleged alternate source demonstration. This table identifies the CCR surface impoundments known to be in assessment monitoring and required to identify any constituent(s) in appendix IV detected at statistically significant levels (SSL) above groundwater protection standards and post notice of the assessment monitoring outcome per 40 C.F.R. § 257.95. The table includes the surface impoundments that were required to post notice of appendix IV exceedance(s), as applicable, or elected to do so as of the time of this assessment monitoring outcomes review (summer 2019). To the best of our knowledge, neither EPA nor any other entity has attempted to assemble this information and make it public. Note that this document is not confirming that the industry notifications or assessments were compliant with the CCR Rule or that additional units may not belong on this list. Assessment Monitoring Outcome # of Surface Impoundments Appendix IV Exceedance(s) 214 Appendix IV Exceedance(s), alleged Alternate Source Demonstration 16 No Appendix IV Exceedance Reported 64 Total 294 Name of Plant Appendix IV Operator CCR Unit or Site Exceedance(s) Healy Power Plant GVEA AK Unit 1 Ash Pond Yes Healy Power Plant GVEA AK Unit 1 Emergency Overflow Pond Yes Healy Power Plant GVEA AK Unit 1 Recirculating Pond Yes Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclamation and Development of Geomechanically Transformed Land in the Konin-Turek Coal Basin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE VOL. XLIX/2 2016 PL ISSN 0079-2985 DOI: 10.17951/pjss/2016.49.2.123 AGNIESZKA MOCEK-PŁÓCINIAK* RECLAMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMECHANICALLY TRANSFORMED LAND IN THE KONIN-TUREK COAL BASIN Received: 2016.09.05 Accepted: 2017.02.15 1Abstract. This overview article presents major forms of reclamation and development of external and internal spoil tips, which are formed during brown coal mining and from bottom ash dumped near open-pit mines and power stations. In the late 1970s, a new form of agricultural and forest recultivation was developed – the PAN model. According to the concept, crops and forest-forming plant species should be introduced to post-mining grounds immediately after the end of technical recultivation. Vegetation is a particularly reliable indicator of habitat properties and small changes taking place in nature undergoing recovery. Other bioindicators of the quality and health of new- ly formed soil include the biomass of microorganisms, their count, composition and enzymatic activity. In many countries the assessment of the influence of anthropogenic stress factors on the count of soil microorganisms has become one of key elements of obligatory inspection under environmental monitoring. In consequence of revitalisation of anthropogenically changed areas, biological life is restored within the period of at least 20–30 years. It is manifested by the develop- ment of microbial population and soil fauna. Keywords: reclamation, post-mining areas, enzymatic activity, microorganisms, vegetation INTRODUCTION Many minerals are acquired by means of open-pit or underground mining. It causes land transformation and permanent changes in the landscape. New convex forms known as external spoil tips appear in natural geomorphologi- cal systems.
    [Show full text]