DOCSLIB.ORG

Eight KATYN DOES NOT HAPPEN TWICE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eight KATYN DOES NOT HAPPEN TWICE Eight KATYN DOES NOT HAPPEN TWICE 7RPDV.DYDOLDXVNDVDQG5njWD%DJGDQDYLþLnjWơ British poet Desmond Graham wrote a poem in 2007, prior to the tragedy of Katyn in Smolensk airport; however, the poem can be read as if it were written for the occasion. Although the airport of the poem is not of Smolensk, coinci- dentally it is also set in springtime: 6SULQJ/HFK:DOĊVD$LUSRUW The pilot announces „Spring has come All over Europe“ The giant beside me Still prays For safe landing The weight-lifter Who put down his case Like a glass of champagne Dares not look out There’s a bundle of wrestlers Clamped to their seats In the back dreading The slightest of shocks The priest up and down Like a steward assures us If anything happens His route is up The rest of us Make it to land If at all In deep shock1 144 720$6.$9$/,$86.$6$1'5Nj7$%$*'$1$9,ý,Nj7Ơ The recorded voices recovered from the black boxes revealed that, just be- fore the tragedy at the Smolensk airport, passengers realized that they were doomed to catastrophe. In the words of Desmond Graham, they landed in deep shock—forever. The Polish President Kaczynski seems to be Kat(cz)ynski, as the Katyn ghost of seventy years prior had been a part of his identity. On the one hand, this death of the Polish elite was meaningless, unexpected, unprec- edented. They died in a catastrophe because of thick fog and low visibility. Lacking a conspiracy theory the tragedy loses its drama, meaning and purpose. From this perspective it has nothing to do with patriotism or martyrdom. Not coincidentally a Belgium cartoon pictured the Polish eagle landing on its head with a mocking comment: “The eagle has landed.”2 Knowing the ostentatious posture of President Kaczynski and his frequently pretentious attitude, such a crash en route to such an event brought a genuine smile to his opponents’ faces. President Kaczynski was apparently notorious for his willingness to make im- pressive landings in spite of warnings of low visibility—for instance, in one case he threatened to give a pilot the sack for not landing in Tbilisi. But the wit- nesses who cite the opposite might be equally in the right: this Polish President ZRXOGDOVRFORVHWKHSODQH¶VZLQGRZEOLQGHUVGXHWRKLVGLVFRPIRUWRIÀ\LQJ From the mystical perspective we may easily suspect destiny—an unavoid- able death in the land of the 1940 massacre of Katyn. In this sense the Polish elite united with the victims existentially and commemorated them by losing own lives. It is as if the seventy year old ghost(s) of the Katyn massacre had taken down the plane and crashed it. Just as the characters die in Shakespeare’s Hamlet because the ghost of Hamlet’s father haunts the castle of Kronborg at Elsinore, similarly the ghost of the past of Katyn brought death to the pas- sengers of the presidential plane. That plane was traveling for the anniversary commemoration of this tragic event. But in Hamlet characters die because of revenge and a battle for power. In the case of Katyn 2010, the victims die merely in their nationalist attempt to commemorate Katyn of 1940. Political insinuation of Russian conspiracy was apparent while watching the exclusive and almost royal funeral of the President in Krakow—the solemnity created out of respect for the President and the First Lady implied a martyr status for the glory of Poland. Symbolically appropriate, during the time of the funeral Europe’s sky was covered with the ash smoke steaming from Iceland’s volcano. Russian Presi- GHQW'PLWULM0HGYHGHYLJQRUHGLWDQGWRRNWKHULVNRIÀ\LQJLQWRDWWHQGWKH funeral, whereas Barack Obama, Nicolas Sarkozy, and Angela Merkel all used the ashy air as an excuse for their absence. It seems like Medvedev had no choice but to arrive, regardless of the circumstances, in order to avoid con- VSLUDF\WKHRU\'LGKLVÀLJKWLPSO\DSHUVRQDOULVNRIKLVOLIH":KDWZDVWKH degree of likelihood that he would crash? Would he have taken the risk if there was a high degree of likelihood? Thus, did Obama, Sarkozy and Merkel use the possible risk only as an excuse to avoid attendance at the funeral ceremony or was the risk indeed quite high? In this case the President of Russia, Dmitrij .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dramatic Space of Hamlet's Theatre
    Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 4, 1 (2012) 59-75 “The Play’s the Thing” The Dramatic Space of Hamlet’s Theatre Balázs SZIGETI Eötvös Loránd University Department of English Studies [email protected] Abstract. In my paper I investigate the use of the dramatic space in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. The tragedy will be observed with the method of “pre-performance criticism,” which first and foremost makes use of the several potentials a play contains and puts on display before an actual performance; it offers, also in the light of the secondary literature, various ways of interpretation, resulting from the close-reading of the play and considers their possible realizations in the space of the stage both from the director’s and the actor’s point of view, including the consequences the respective lines of interpretation may have as regards the play as a whole. Hamlet does not only raise the questions of the theatrical realization of a play but it also reflects on the ontology of the dramatic space by putting the performance of The Mousetrap-play into one of its focal points and scrutinises the very interaction between the dramatic space and the realm of the audience. I will discuss the process how Hamlet makes use of his private theatre and how the dramatic space is transformed as The Murder of Gonzago turns into The Mousetrap-performance. Keywords: Hamlet; The Mousetrap; dramatic space; pre-performance criticism Shakespeare’s Hamlet1 does not only raise the questions of the theatrical realization of a play but it also reflects on the ontology of the dramatic space by putting the performance of The Mousetrap-play into one of its focal points and 1 In the present paper I quote the play according to the Norton Shakespeare edition (Greenblatt et.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet on the Screen Prof
    Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature Abbreviated Key Title: Sch Int J Linguist Lit ISSN 2616-8677 (Print) |ISSN 2617-3468 (Online) Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Journal homepage: https://saudijournals.com/sijll Review Article Hamlet on the Screen Prof. Essam Fattouh* English Department, Faculty of Arts, University of Alexandria (Egypt) DOI: 10.36348/sijll.2020.v03i04.001 | Received: 20.03.2020 | Accepted: 27.03.2020 | Published: 07.04.2020 *Corresponding author: Prof. Essam Fattouh Abstract The challenge of adapting William Shakespeare‟s Hamlet for the screen has preoccupied cinema from its earliest days. After a survey of the silent Hamlet productions, the paper critically examines Asta Nielsen‟s Hamlet: The Drama of Vengeance by noting how her main character is really a woman. My discussion of the modern productions of Shakespeare begins with a critical discussion of Lawrence Olivier‟s seminal production of 1948. The Russian Hamlet of 1964, directed by Grigori Kozintsev, is shown to combine a psychological interpretation of the hero without disregarding its socio-political context. The action-film genre deployed by Franco Zeffirelli in his 1990 adaptation of the play, through a moving performance by Mel Gibson, is analysed. Kenneth Branagh‟s ambitious and well-financed production of 1996 is shown to be somewhat marred by its excesses. Michael Almereyda‟s attempt to present Shakespeare‟s hero in a contemporary setting is shown to have powerful moments despite its flaws. The paper concludes that Shakespeare‟s masterpiece will continue to fascinate future generations of directors, actors and audiences. Keywords: Shakespeare – Hamlet – silent film – film adaptations – modern productions – Russian – Olivier – Branagh – contemporary setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Supernatural Elements in Shakespeare's Plays
    ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 391-395, March 2019 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.22 Supernatural Elements in Shakespeare’s Plays Liwei Zhu Tianjin Polytechnic University, China Abstract—This paper analyzes the supernatural elements of Shakespeare’s plays from several aspects. It first introduces the historical background of Shakespeare’s writing career. Then, it analyzes supernatural elements in three of his great plays and introduces how the supernatural elements are represented on stage in old Elizabethan period and in modern times. Last, it provides the modern implications to the 21 st century viewers of Shakespeare’s plays. Index Terms—the supernatural elements, ghosts, Elizabethan period I. INTRODUCTION Modern humans find it difficult to believe in ghosts, witches or other supernatural beings. They couldn’t understand why people in the Elizabethan period can be so serious about these things. People’s intense fear towards the supernatural elements is probably due to the lack of physical knowledge about world they were living in. Shakespeare introduced many supernatural elements into his plays. Without looking at the reasons and motivations behind them, we wouldn’t be able to detect the plays’ underlied meanings and implications. Shakespeare’s plays are always considered to be the greatest plays in the world literary history, not only because of the beautiful language, the complex plot construction and the modern implication of their universal themes, but also because of the breathtaking literary skills applied and mysterious elements in these plays. The supernatural elements constitute a significant part of Shakespeare’s plays, whether in the romantic comedies in the early period---A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1596) or in the tragedies of the second period---Hamlet (1601), Othello (1606), Mac Beth (1606), Romeo and Juliet (1607) or in his later romance---The Tempest (1611).
    [Show full text]
  • Identity and Role-Playing in Shakespeare's Hamlet
    The Mask of Madness: Identity and Role-playing in Shakespeare’s Hamlet Treball de Fi de Grau Grau en Estudis Anglesos Supervisor: Dr Jordi Coral Escola Anna Fluvià Sabio June 2016 Acknowledgments Throughout the writing of this TFG, I have benefited from the advice of Dr Jordi Coral Escola. I am very grateful for his constant support, suggestions and corrections. I would also like to thank my family and friends for having been extremely supportive and encouraging during this process. Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 Madness as a Key Theme in Elizabethan Drama.......................................................... 3 The Spanish Tragedy and Hamlet ................................................................................. 4 Chapter 1: Madness .......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Origins of his Madness ........................................................................................... 6 1.2 Assuming the Role of the Madman ...................................................................... 10 Chapter 2: Theatricality .................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Hamlet’s Role ....................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Metadramatic Elements in the Play .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Television Shakespeare from the BBC, 1937-39 Wyver, J
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch An Intimate and Intermedial Form: Early Television Shakespeare from the BBC, 1937-39 Wyver, J. This is a preliminary version of a book chapter published in Shakespeare Survey 69: Shakespeare and Rome, Cambridge University Press, pp. 347-360, ISBN 9781107159068 Details of the book are available on the publisher’s website: https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we-publish/collections/shakespea... The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 1 An intimate and intermedial form: early television Shakespeare from the BBC, 1937-39 In the twenty-seven months between February 1937 and April 1939 the fledgling BBC television service from Alexandra Palace broadcast more than twenty Shakespeare adaptations.1 The majority of these productions were short programmes featuring ‘scenes from…’ the plays, although there were also substantial adaptations of Othello (1937), Julius Caesar (1938), Twelfth Night and The Tempest (both 1939) as well as a presentation of David Garrick’s 1754 version of The Taming of the Shrew, Katharine and Petruchio (1939). There were other Shakespeare-related programmes as well, and the playwright himself appeared in three distinct historical dramas. In large part because no recordings exist of these transmissions (or of any British television Shakespeare before 1955), these ‘lost’ adaptations have received little scholarly attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet, the Ghost and the Model Reader
    HAMLET, THE GHOST AND THE MODEL READER THE PROBLEMS OF THE RECEPTION AND A CONCEPT OF SHAKESPEARE’S HAMLET Doctoral dissertation by András G. Bernáth Supervisor: Prof. Guido Latré, PhD Université Catholique de Louvain 2013 ABSTRACT In a comprehensive study of Hamlet and its reception, this dissertation offers a concept and interpretation of Shakespeare’s work as a complex literary work and play for the theatre. It is argued that the play, through a series of ambiguities, implies two main levels of meaning, which complement each other in a truly dramatic contrast, exploring the main theme of Hamlet and dramatic art in general: seeming and being, or illusion and reality. On the surface, which has been usually maintained since the Restoration, Hamlet seems to be a moral hero, who “sets it right” by punishing the evil villain, the usurper King Claudius, following the miraculous return of the murdered King Hamlet from the dead. At a deeper level, exploring the Christian context including King James’s Daemonologie (1597), the Ghost demanding revenge is, in fact, a disguised devil, exploiting the tragic flaw of the protagonist, who wishes the damnation of his enemy. Fortinbras, who comes from the north like King James and renounces revenge, is rewarded with the kingdom after the avengers, Hamlet and Laertes, kill each other and virtually the entire Danish court is wiped out through Hamlet’s quest of total revenge, pursuing both body and soul. The aesthetic identity of Hamlet is also examined. In addition to the mainly philological and historical analysis of the text, the play, some adaptations and the critical reception, theoretical concerns are also included.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 Historical Review Elizabethan 1 Was Queen of England When
    1.1 Historical Review Elizabethan 1 was queen of England when Shakespeare was born in 1564 . He was the son of a tradesman who made and sold gloves in the small town of Stratford-upon-Avon , and he was educated at the grammar school at that town . William Shakespeare did not go to university after he left school, but worked in his father's business . When he was eighteen he married Anne Hathaway who became the mpther of his daughter Suzanna and of twins . There is nothing exciting or even unusual in this story ; and from 1585 until 1592 , there are no documents that can tell anything at all about Shakespeare . However in 1592 , he was known in London and that he had become both an actor and a play right . Nothing is also known as to when he wrote his first play and the order in which he wrote his works. But what is commonly held to be true amongst critics is that he started by writing plays on subjects taken from the history of England . This because he was an intensely patriotic man , but he was also a shrewd businessman . He could see that the theatre audiences enjoyed being shown their own history , and it was certain that he would make profit of this kind of drama . The plays were mainly comedies , with romantic love stories of young people who fell in love with ne another and at the end of the story marry and live happily ever after. At the end of the sixteenth century , the happiness disappears and Shakespeare's plays become melancholy , bitter and tragic .
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet Act Three, Scene One 44. Claudius and Polonius Hide to Spy
    Hamlet Act Three, Scene One 44. Claudius and Polonius hide to spy on whom? Ophelia and Hamlet 45. During Hamlet’s famous “to be or not to be” speech, what is he contemplating? Suicide 46. How does Hamlet insult Ophelia? Tells her to go be a prostitute 47. Does Hamlet know they are being watched? Not at first; he figures it out when he hears a noise. Ophelia lies to him when he asks her where her father is. 48. What does Claudius think is the cause of Hamlet’s madness? What does Polonius think? Claudius thinks he is plotting something. Polonius still thinks he is in love with Ophelia. Act Three, Scene Two 49. What is Hamlet hosting for the royal court of Denmark? A play called The Murder of Gonzago. 50. What does Hamlet ask Horatio to do for him? He asks him to watch Claudius’ reactions to the play. 51. Who does Hamlet sit with during the play? Ophelia; he also makes very inappropriate comments to her. 52. What does Hamlet say is the name of the play? The Mousetrap. 53. What is Claudius’ reaction to the play? He gets upset and storms out; he calls off the rest of the performance. 54. Hamlet says to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern: “Why do you think I am easier to be played upon than a pipe?” Why does he that? What does he mean? He knows they are trying to get information out of him. He thinks that they are insulting his intelligence. 55. Who wants to see/speak with Hamlet at the end of scene two? Gertrude Act Three, Scene Three 56.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriel Egan
    EnterText 1.2 GABRIEL EGAN Introduction to the Proceedings of the Conference “Hamlet on Screen” held at Shakespeare's Globe, London, on 28 April 2001 The play Hamlet is at or near the centre of the intellectual and commercial domain which is the “Shakespeare” construct. It is the only one to which an entire academic journal is devoted (Hamlet Studies), it contains the best-known lines of all dramatic literature – perhaps of all literature – and its imagery (especially of contemplation of a skull) is frequently employed synecdochically to connote Shakespeare and his works generally. The centrality of Hamlet is arguably a Romantic phenomenon – John Keats and S. T. Coleridge were typical in finding in themselves something of the indecisive prince – and the ageing Western world population of the twenty-first century might find King Lear more relevant. On 28 April 2001 a project intimately concerned with Shakespeare’s original theatrical context, the International Shakespeare Globe Centre in London, in conjunction with King’s College London, convened a conference for scholars to explore how this currently central work, Hamlet, has been represented on the cinema and television screen. The papers in this issue of EnterText comprise the published proceedings of that “Hamlet on Screen” conference. Gabriel Egan: Introduction to “Hamlet on Screen” Proceedings171 EnterText 1.2 As Mark Robson observes in his paper, every Hamlet since the first one is a repetition, and a common theme of papers was the way in which these repetitions engage in other contexts, many quite alien to the original performances; from these engagements new meanings are generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Castle Is It Anyway? : Local/Global Negotiations of a Shakespearean Location
    Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance vol. 15 (30), 2017; DOI: 10.1515/mstap-2017-0009 ∗ Anne Sophie Refskou Whose Castle is it Anyway? : Local/Global Negotiations of a Shakespearean Location Abstract: Kronborg Castle in the Danish town of Elsinore is a location strongly associated with Shakespeare thanks to the setting of Hamlet. It is a place where fiction currently eclipses history, at least in the context of a cultural tourist industry where Shakespeare’s name is worth a great deal more than Danish national heritage sites. Indeed, Kronborg is now widely marketed as ‘Hamlet’s Castle’ and the town of Elsinore has acquired the suffix ‘Home of Hamlet’. This article examines the signifiers implied in the naming and renaming of Kronborg as a Shakespearean location, while also looking at its unique international Shakespearean performance tradition, which spans two centuries. It describes how the identity of the castle has been shaped by its Shakespearean connection against the backdrop of changing ideologies in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and poses questions as to how this identity may continue to develop within the current contexts of renewed nationalism in Europe and the world. Keywords: Hamlet, Elsinore, Kronborg, globalization, nationalism, borders, inter- culturalism. Something have you heard of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark’s transformations and of the manifold interpretations which have confused us and confuse us still. Is he a Dane? A countryman of yours?1 Kronborg Castle in Elsinore has acquired most—if not all—of its international fame thanks to Shakespeare. Every year tourists flock to the small port town on the east coast of Denmark to see the rather magnificent fortified castle associated with Hamlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Ghost College Bulletin
    PITTSBURGH COLLEGE BULLETIN 11 to their ears —when the ghost enters. Hamlet calls upon it to tell the why and the wherefore of this unnatural apparition. The ghost beckons the Prince; he follows it despite the remonstrances and opposition of Horatio. The ghost led Hamlet to a remote part of the plat- form. There he related to him how, when he was sleep- ing in the garden the present King had stolen upon him and poured the poisonous juice of hebenon into his ear. He then gave out that a serpent had stung the late King. By all the filial affection he ever bore him did the ghost conjure Hamlet to avenge on his uncle the murder of his father, and left him with the words "Remember me." Most solemnly did Hamlet swear, by all the heavens, the earth and hell to dissolve all trivial bonds of affection, to desist from all former occupation, and to live solely for revenge. His companions, also, he made swear on the hilt of his sword that they would never reveal what they had seen, telling them nothing, however, of what passed between himself and the ghost. While he was making them swear, the ghost beneath the earth made himself heard three successive times by Hamlet, muttering "Swear." Thinking himself to be the victim of a delusion, Hamlet shifted his position each time; still he heard the voice. Thus changed in mind and heart, the prey of fierce moral combats, subjected to fits of darkest melancholy, we find Hamlet at the end of the first act.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Idealism in Shakespeare's Prince Hamlet Tabassum Javed *
    Perfect Idealism in Shakespeare's Prince Hamlet Tabassum Javed * Abstract Hamlet's exclusion from his father's throne was not Hamlet's problem on the whole but the restoration to its rightful owner was virtually necessary for his survival and personal safety. He refers explicitly, at least twice, that he has unwillingly taken on himself the task of revenge. Hamlet was an unwilling instrument in the gradual drift towards disaster. He bitterly resents being played upon like a pipe by being given over entirely to serve somebody else’s behest. He cannot indeed fully recognize that he is his father's puppet. He cannot shrug off his father's commands as none of his own concern. Hamlet's problem is the problem of responding to a call unflinchingly. But the Ghost is in no way concerned about Hamlet's own safety. He is concerned only with the revenge of his own murder. He is uncompromising in his call for revenge. As a dutiful son he is to carry out his father’s order and kill Claudius as an act of filial duty. But Hamlet is in an intolerable position. He can save himself and Denmark by killing Claudius, but to kill Claudius is to act out his father's wish and the disaster for Hamlet is that this course of action perfectly coincides with the solution of his own problem. Hamlet is torn between two courses of action, both equally painful. If they conflict with the individual goal, they create one dilemma; if they coincide, they create another. Hamlet is a perfect example of an idealist who shrinks from accepting the role forced upon him.
    [Show full text]