Consultation Statement

3Bs Neighbourhood Plan

11 May 2020

1

Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...... 3 2. Consultation Events in 2016...... 3 3. Summary of all Consultation Events ...... 4 4. Regulation 14 Consultation Responses ...... 13 5. Photos of Regulation 14 Consultation ...... 28

2

1. Introduction 1.1 This consultation statement has been prepared to fulfil the legal obligations of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations in accordance with the Localism Act 2011 in respect of the 3Bs Neighbourhood Plan. The legal basis of the statement is provided by Section 15(2) of Part 5 of the 2012 Neighbourhood Planning Regulations, which requires that a consultation statement should:

• Contain details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed NP • Explain how they were consulted • Summarise the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted • Describe how those issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed NP. 1.2 The 3Bs arose from discussions between local community groups (facilitated by the ward advisory board) and the ward councillors. A steering committee was first established in the autumn of 2015, leading to the Forum being formally constituted at an AGM in June 2016. Membership recruitment has been central from the start.

2. Consultation Events in 2016 1.3 Key events in 2016 were: Ward committee and 3Bs NP launch event at the Alexander Stadium in March 2016, attended by about 80 people. This had a presentation on sustainable drainage by council staff, followed by a presentation by members of the 3Bs steering committee. It then went on to choose the name 3Bs from a number of options put forward by residents.

1.4 During 2016 3Bs committee members had street stalls at:

• The Queen's birthday event at Tower Hill in May; • The Perry Hall Park open day in July; • At Thornbridge Avenue in September

3

3. Summary of all Consultation Events 1.5 The table below lists all the consultation events and activities undertaken with the local community throughout the preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan.]

4

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded Jun-2015 Alexander Stadium Initial c 12 Perry Barr ward Routine meetings Establishment of discussions advisory board steering group and briefing members, representing all community organisations 24.9.2015 Perry Hall Perry Barr 100 Key stakeholders Leaflets, letters of Brief presentation Methodist Church, ward invited to ward invitation, social of proposals for Rocky Lane committee meetings, residents of media plan Tower Hill area affected by local issues Feb-2016 Calshot Survey 66 Residents of Calshot Doorstep visits, Substantial Rd/Cramlington Rd organised by Road and Cramlington surveys through ground water ward Road door problems, councillors, support for asking about sustainable flood, drainage project drainage Feb-2016 All Survey 3 All residents Leaflets through 3 suggestions circulated by door ward councillors, asking about name for forum

5

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded Mar-2016 Alexander Stadium Launch event, 80 All residents and local Leaflets through Meeting voted sustainable businesses, city door, social media, for 3Bs name, 3Bs drainage council emergency press reports, AGM organised, briefing from planning team, other stakeholders comments council floods key stakeholders invited to ward collected on team, hosted invited to ward committees proposed themes by ward committee committee 16.6.2016 Perry Hall First AGM 33 All residents Personal invites to Core themes Methodist church, members, local decided, working Rocky Lane press, social media groups established 30.6.2016 Perry Hall Ward social media, Report back on Methodist Church, committee stakeholders progress, Rocky Lane invited to ward discussion on committees, flood recent floods prevention team 2016 Summer survey 11.6.2016 Tower Hill Queens Public invited Attendees at event Publicity for event, Birthday Event to suggest use of tent with ideas on the posters and tables, five themes social media 23.7.2016 Perry Hall Park fun Public invited Attendees at event Publicity for event, day to suggest use of tent with ideas on the posters & table, five themes social media

6

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded Flood and drainage group 29.9.2016 Thornbridge Flood and 14 Residents of Haddon Avenue stall drainage Road, passers by at survey, also shops, local shops engagement visited from local centres group 20.1.2016 Ward committee Presentation 30 Stakeholders, public personal invites, Meeting heard on plan, flood social media presentations and drainage from all five survey working groups 23.1.2017 Beeches Public 40 Members, about 100 Letters through Evangelical Church, meeting on households affected door (or email to floods, by June 2016 floods in members), social members' Church Road, Haddon media meeting Road, Thornbridge Avenue, Turnberry Road, Cardington Avenue Perry Hall Ward 35 Stakeholders, public Personal invites, Presentation on 16.3.17 Methodist church, committee social media local innovation Rocky Lane fund bids for plan,also related projects

7

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded Turnberry Park, Perry Wood restoration. Meeting supported proposals by show of hands 27.3.2017 Calshot School Launch of 18 Members, residents Letters through Scoping scoping of Calshot Road door (or email to document document members), press approved, number of supplementary proposals from meeting 2017 Summer Survey See next 3 15 Specific questions items on backlands development, loft conversions 15.7.2017 Tower Hill Survey on 12 Local residents Publicity for event, See analysis community event design, use of tent with pavement posters and tables, design and social media use of backlands 22.7.2017 Perry Hall Park Local Publicity for See analysis community event residents event, use of

8

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded tent with posters and tables, social media Sep-17 on-line survey 4 Local Social media, shared See analysis residents from Facebook group Autumn Calshot Road/The Doorstep c40 Residents All houses visited. Widespread 2017 Rise visits to all Preceded by support for houses letters from ward project surrounding councillors Perry Wood Restoration site 15.2.2018 Alexander Stadium Ward 200 Local residents, Press coverage, 3Bs reps to play committee businesses, social media, key part in Games special stakeholders personal invites Resident Liaison meeting on Group, Commonweal established by th Games meeting 23.6.2018 Perry Wood Action Day Local residents, 3Bs Letters through restoration site members door (or email to members), social media, contact via Brownies Jul-2018 Tower Hill Survey on 3 Publicity for event, See analysis community event design, use of tent with

9

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded pavement posters, tables, design and social media use of backlands Aug-2018 All residents Councillors' 20 All households Leaflets through Overwhelming summer doors, some support for survey doorstep visits "garden suburb" concept 5.9.2018 Whole area Walkabout 8 Friends of Perry Hall Personal contact Site visits, some with planning Park, Friends of Perry engagement with consultants Park, Friends of parents at Turnberry Park, 3Bs Calshot School committee 18.10.18 Beeches Members' 30 Members, members Social media, Meeting Evangelical Church, meeting of Commonwealth announcement at discussed key Games resident CGRLG meeting choices for plan, liaison group made decisions, report back on Commonwealth Games Nov-2018 Alexander Stadium Presentation 50 Members of group, Personal invites Stressed to Commonwealth important of Commonweal Games officials "green gateway" th Games into Birmingham, Resident enhancement of liaison group parks

10

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded Regulation 14 Consultation 19.11.2018 Perry Wood Site visit with 1 Woodland Trust Email Woodland Trust restoration site, Nick supportive, Barr Bank (rear of Sandford, supplied details Calshot/Mildenhall) Woodland of neighbourhood Trust planning advice Jan-2019 Rocky Consultation 7 All residents letter through 4 in favour of Lane/Derrydown letter on surrounding site door green space, 1 in Road designating favour of green space development, 2 state leave alone Feb-2019 Residents of Consultation 49 About 200 letter through Overwhelming Mildenhall Road letter on door support for and Calshot Road designating proposals green space and naming Barr Bank 10.3.2019 Rocky Lane - Residents 25 Residents of Rocky Personal approach Meeting voted in Methodist Church meeting Lane by meeting favour of organisers incorporating land north of Perry Hall Park (see previous) into park

11

Date Where? What? How many Who was invited? How were people Key findings approx. took invited? part or responded 11.3.2019 Mildenhall Road Meeting with 2 Resident activists Meeting with Jon Residents shared residents Hunt and John plans to develop Spencer Barr Bank Nature Reserve. Minimum 826 number of local people involved before NP written

12

4. Regulation 14 Consultation Responses

1.6 This section contains the responses received on the Pre-Submission Draft 3Bs NP throughout the Regulation 14 consultation period which ran from November 18th 2019 until February 7th extended until 6th March 2020 to enable BCC to respond. Responses were from both local residents and other consulted bodies and statutory consultees.

1.7 A questionnaire was produced that was available online at https://3bsplanning.wixsite.com/planningforum . This survey was also used at the drop in events where residents were encouraged to completed them during the drop in. Consultation events were held at Cliveden Avenue, Calshot School, Rockey Lane, Trehurst and St Johns. 41 surveys were completed. The feedback from the survey is set out below

Do you agree with this Will the policies proposed vision for our area in the plan help achieve this vision

Yes No Don’t know Yes No Don’t know

Do you agree with the Do you agree with the key community objectives set. planning controls proposed in NPP1, NPP2, NPP3, NPP7

Yes No Don't know

Yes No Don't know

13

Do these policies meet our Do you agree with the objective of reducing flood development controls risks proposed in NPP3

Yes No Don't know Yes No

Do you agree with the Do you agree with the community actions proposals in NPP4 to improve proposed to support connections between residents and visitors with our local centres

Yes No Don't know Yes No Don't know

Do you agree with the Do you agree with planning controls in NPP5 designating these new to improve biodiversity green spaces?

Yes No Yes No

14

Do you support these Do you agree with these policies and proposals proposals for Tower intended to reduce flood Hill? risk

Yes No Yes No

Do you agree with these Do you agree with these proposal for the Turnburry proposals for Rd area? Thornbridge Avn?

Yes No Don't know Yes No Don't Know

Do you agree with the Baltimore Estate - Do you policy proposals for agree with these proposals? buildings of local historic value?

Yes No Don't know Yes No Don't Know

15

Do you agree with the proposed planning protection for community facilities

Yes No Don't Know

The survey findings show that the vast majority of respondents support the Neighbourhood Plan vision, objectives and policies.

Below the tables show the comments received from the statutory consultees and the additional comments provided by local people as part of the survey, and how the 3Bs NP has been amended to take them into account.

Comments from Statutory Consultees Birmingham City Council Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made General Suggested moving some of Editing done and some of Y the justification text into the background appendices information moved to appendices

NPP1 Wording in NPP1 is in Noted NA accordance with newly adopted Statement of Community Involvement NPP 2 Suggested wording Amended Y amendment as ‘proposals are required to demonstrate they will’ but not all proposals have to adhere to the following points to be approved. This may not be achievable as not all the bullet points apply to every planning application received.

16

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made We therefore suggest the policy uses phrases such as: ‘where appropriate’ or ‘where they affect’ to resolve e) this issue. Amended

Ref to shopping centres g) needs amending to shopping Amended and footnote areas added to provide explanation for the reader h) Point g ref to wording Amended hierarchy needs adding

Add where viable re community facilities

NPP 3 not always possible or Amended Y 2a appropriate to retain trees/hedges we suggest a caveat is included to say that if not possible to retain, trees/hedges must be replaced. – this is in accordance with BCC 2b development plan replace the word ‘strong planting’ with ‘strong, soft landscaping’ 4 Added to text before NPP remove included in the 3 supporting text as this can’t be implemented in planning decisions. This point is supporting a council scheme that is already happening. 5 Suggested wording for clarity Amended NPP 4 Suggested rewording points Amended Y in policy as part of one list under NPP 4 (1) NPP 5 Reference to mitigation Amended Y 1 hierarchy required wording added and ref 2 Not compatible with NPPF back to NPP 2 175 and TP8 not flexible Map 4 enough

17

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made Add all sites of nature ref to mitigation hierarchy conservation interest should in point 1 considered be added on Map 4 adequate point 2 removed 4 Remove ref to tree species Moved to text and ref to that assist with air quality as other species reinforced can caused allergic reactions And tree policy reviews in 2018 and Full Council agreed to implement this approach so no need to state tree 5 species Where appropriate added but rest of point 5 remains Alternate wording for point 5 as Forum considered ‘tree ‘Where appropriate, canopy’ did not reflect the landscaping schemes aspiration of the submitted to support major community planning applications in the 3Bs Area will need to Ref to tree species consider the potential for removed and amended to tree canopy and biodiversity more general statement net gain.’ about value of trees and vegetation in delivering numerous benefits – ref to improving air quality removed as evidence not clear (after further advise sought from landscape architect Dave Singleton) NPP 6 Suggest these LGs could be Amended Y designated as SINCs or SLINCs NPP 6 (2) Wording to NPP 6 2 proposed Amended text except for Partial Y to use similar language to the ‘where the benefits of the NPPF or development clearly outweigh the impact that it is likely to have on the local green space’ This point was discussed with Alice Jones at – NPPF test at para 136 is development only in expectational circumstances and it was

18

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made advised that BCC wording was not in line with this NPP 7 (1) Wording as stated removes The text made it clear that Y permitted development this was not the intention rights but agree that the policy was not clear – wording amended NPP 8 -10 Minor rewording proposed Amendments accepted Y

Map 17 Listed buildings – suggest one BCC to provide a map ? map showing all heritage showing heritage assets assets including those proposed for local listing NPP 11 Bridge is scheduled ancient Noted and text amended Y monument not listed building Conservation Panel no longer exists

NPP 11 (3) Plan needs to include ref to Agreed – that was the all heritage assets intention text amended

Liaise with conservation team Agree –this is a community before finalise the Plan. We action and they can begin suggest you provide the list, the process as Plan being photographs of the made but not nec to have buildings/assets, and explain all work done and Local why you have identified them List agreed. The policy is to be of special interest at a endorsing the nomination local level e.g. architectural, of these buildings and the historic and historic role of the Forum in communal value etc. identifying future buildings that may be eligible.

NPP 12 Not in general conformity Text amended to clarify Y with BDP that issue relates to only To change use from part of Baltimore estate employment to housing you and text amended to show need to demonstrate it is that warehousing on becoming obsolete HM issue I Walsall Road not an issue think is that type of use is per sey but that considered inappropriate landscaping policy needs next to park to reflect location Map requested to show Wording added to Policy extent of Baltimore Estate NPP 12 (1) where it is

19

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made that is issue and location of evidenced it is in Y windmill cottages accordance with TP20’ Wording of policy proposed The Forum were to ensure that change of use requested to annotate a only when evidence that area map showing extent of obsolete proposed change of use The Baltimore Industrial and windmill cottages – Estate is shown as being map added. within Flood Zone 2 on Map 8 policy should include requirements for flood mitigation measures Criteria added to NPP 12 2 Y and 3. NPP 13 Policy in line with NPPF Criteria order amended Y Suggest change of word order of criteria to make it read more positively easier to read

Table 7 clarify what extending Wording amended to Y access to community for enabling the wider Badshah Palace means is community to enjoy the development proposed? old cinema is supported – development not proposed Tree Officer Helpful comments on Amended text Y importance of tree diversity, and species benefits

TPOs- queries which trees Ref in LGS removed ref to Y have TPOs not ones around St TPOs around St Pauls Paul’s– referred to in LGS clarification on TPO map designation map provided by received from BCC BCC to the Forum Detailed Various specific amendments All information added Y comments – requested to update or general provide better factual information

WM Police Designing Out Crime Section of the Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments Plan Made General Provided an analysis of the 3Bs Summary useful for the N area noting points of improved Forum and observation safety or areas indicating of the public open crime space as jewel in the

20

Many positive points re crown – reflects the minimal litter and graffiti but community view and noted Turnberry park - At the the need to maximise time of my visit (24.1.2020) the benefit of these there was a burnt-out car, spaces. dumped fridges and a mattress on Turnberry Park.

Public Open Space – The “jewel in the crown” in many ways with sizable areas in the study area, considerable community involvement e.g. Friends of Perry Hall Park, Bark For The Park, Cycle tracks (BMX & Cycle Speedway), gardening projects, sport and recreation, a high take up of allotment plots, well maintained and used by the community.

WM Police Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made general Welcomes the recognition in the Reference to designing Y Vision that ‘...Streets and public out crime added to CO spaces will be well managed and 4 and NPP 2 the area will provide people with... a safe, pleasant and accessible place to live...’ (Community Vision, page 9) disappointed to see that there is no reference to the need to consider crime and safety and the need to reduce the fear of crime within the nine Objectives Consider policy to identify Section added on Y infrastructure which community developer consider appropriate for receipt contributions of financial contributions and CIL explaining the type of projects that would be supported

21

Natural England Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made general Welcomes and supports the environmental Noted NA aspirations its long term ‘garden suburb’ vision and associated community objectives. Consideration of the opportunities from the Commonwealth Games are welcomed and further encouraged.

Pleased to see consideration of the opportunities stemming from this unique opportunity included (e.g. around Perry park proposals, River Tame / housing site interface and Alexander stadium - community Objs 1 and 7). However, there is clearly a hesitancy and nervousness within the Plan around the Games and associated proposals (Paragraphs 10, 43 and 57) and the desire for clear local benefit from a legacy is well made. Specifically, it is clear that the potential impact of the proposed Sprinter bus lanes is a focus for concern as well as major development at Perry park as they ‘may see the loss of more grass verges on Walsall Road and … [impact on]the remaining mature trees and open green spaces there.’ (para 43). In response, Section 8 makes it clear that tackling the cumulative impact of proposals, via improved community involvement and information, is seen as a core aim of the Plan. Specifically, the provision of Table 5 summarising the issues identified and the 3Bs Neighbourhood Plan response is to be commended. Further, proposed Policy NPP3 (5) seeks specifically to address the protection of landscape character and street trees via consideration of sprint land proposals and should be supported.

22

Historic England Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made general We commend the commitment in the Noted NA Plans Vision, objectives and policies to support well designed development that is sympathetic to the character of the area whilst conserving significant local heritage assets (including through Local Listing). Proposals to consolidate and enhance existing green infrastructure, protect green spaces and to work towards a “garden suburb” character for the area are equally commendable.

Sport England Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made General Supports the vision or a high- The plan boundary N quality environment including was designated in parks, waterways and open 2018 and cannot be spaces but suggests the plan extended at this stage boundary is extended to cover without consultation – Doug Ellis Sports Centre and the the boundary was that Holford Drive sports Hub agreed by the Forum

Community Supports the CO 2,3,5,7,9 Sport Noted and welcomed N Objectives England are working closely with strategic partners including the City Council, Commonwealth Games Organising Committee, DCMS and community stakeholders to ensure that the development proposals at Perry Barr deliver both the necessary sporting infrastructure for the Commonwealth Games itself but also provide a legacy for sport and physical activity that will benefit the local to be physically active. Sport England is also supportive of the objective to make better green connections to and between local green spaces. Connectivity between

23

Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made Alexander Stadium and Perry Hall Park is a priority to provide a higher quality connection for walking and cycling than currently exists between these two sports assets. NPP 2 Connections to waterways and Wording added to NPP Y cycle routes could be 2 1 c) strengthened by adding with active forms of travel Map of Perry Queries designation of parts of Noted the description Y Park Perry Park as public open space of public open space is and evidences previous football given by BCC and is pitches and cricket pitch that how it is designated in have existed. There are parts of the Birmingham this site in Perry Park that have Development Plan. previously been laid out as The description does playing pitches and therefore not preclude having have playing field status, albeit football pitches on it currently disused playing field. where there is This is highlighted in the Council’s demand. adopted Playing Pitch Strategy Text added before and Action Plan. Sport England Map 3 to explain that therefore considers that this part this area has in the of the site should be recognised past included various as playing field on these maps. sports pitches and where demand exists and there is a demonstrated short fall the Forum would support the reinstatement of this provision. NPP 4 Supports the policy but policy NPP 4 amended Y should be strengthened to make reference to providing a high quality network of routes for walking and cycling NPP 13 The proposed policy as written NPP 13 3a) amended Y states that a permissible to be in accordance exception for the loss of these with TP11 and NPPF. community facilities would be that they are no longer financially viable. Whilst this may be an appropriate test for non-sports

24

Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made related community facilities, it is not one of the permissible exceptions in Policy TP11 and para 97 of the NPPF, which instead refers to a test of demonstrating that the facility is surplus. 5.

ESP Utilities Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made General low pressure gas main and electric network Noted – ESP NA serving the area in question at grid would be reference E405645, N294330 and security consulted as of supply is vitally important. Map part of any provided to show the location of the planning network and development proposals must application consider the impact on the network process

British Archaeological Council Section of Comments Amendments Amendments the Plan Proposed Made General heritage assets include archaeological sites Noted and Y as well as historic buildings and these must reference be acknowledged and included in the plan updated and its objectives, to ensure that it is throughout consistent with the relevant polices of the Birmingham Development Plan and the NPPF.

Reference to historic environment record Added to Y required section 15 Community Responses Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made Objectives We need more trees. More Agree and the importance Yes agree plants of trees is highlighted already reference updated reflected in Need to strengthen the throughout the NP objective is to include tennis designated heritage assets courts and shops advise forum that could

25

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made also be made assets of Y community value. More green spaces Regina Drive totally made an entrance Regina drive is seen as a to Perry Hall Park key access to the park

N NPP1, What about other shopping The shopping areas Noted NPP2, NPP3 areas? identified were those NPP7 highlighted through community consultation that are within the 3bs area. The NP seeks to reduce the impact of the Sprint proposals but cannot stop Stop extension of bus lane the roll out of the project outside 262-270 Walsall Road Agree Clivedan Roundabout in the area identified as being a attenuation area see Map 10 but here could be Y Green the roundabouts infiltration and text Clivedan Avenue to be made amended SuDs compliant Enjoying Better seats in parks more Agree – improving the Yes agree the garden exercise machines, fit higher parks is an important and an suburb curbs to avoid parking on the objective – the NP only additional verges, opening hours addresses planning policy on extended, matters but the Forum improving will seek funding as part of the parks has any developer been added contribution for the items although improve access to canal from identified specifically Kingsdown Avenue, better Access to the canal is the provision signposting between the parks identified on Map 8 of benches Signposting between the does not parks as part of an require improved active network planning is in NPP 4 permission

26

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made New green Land at the back of Hayden These areas are valuable Yes agree spaces Road back of Beeches Pub, green spaces and the already central reservation on Walsall landscaping, tree planting reflected in Road, under the motorway and SuDs policy seeks to the NP Booth Lane Kingsdown Avenue maximise their benefit but and Canal various verges Road they were not considered end of the allotments eligible to meet the NPPF roundabout to be enhanced criteria for Local Green plant more trees on the Space designation. central reservation on A34. Reducing More green areas, drainage Agree NPP 5 seeks to Yes agree flood risk system built into grass verges, encourage tree planting of already Larger trees on Perrywood species in accordance with reflected in Road and Calshot Road BCC tree policy. the NP remove the small ones unblock the drains and drains This is a matter that the Noted to be cleaned out more often Forum will raise with BCC Local Improve canal bridge and Noted the Forum Noted centres lighting continues to lobby on Tower Hill Improve library these issues Make Badshar comply with regulations Old surgery would make an Yes the issue ideal community centre of flooding Ensure water run off from from the M6 motorways is controlled is reflected in the NP Local Cars cause congestion by Noted and will be Noted Centres parking outside shops considered by the Forum Turnberry Electric charging points at all Rd shops Thornbridge Improve safety for The Plan is hoping to Yes agree Avenue pedestrians, stop parking on encourage SuDs schemes already pavements, encourage shops along Thornbridge Avenue reflected in to use forecourts for customer that will also discourage the NP parking, stop parking on grass parking on the verges and verges and central reservation central reservation. Forum will continue to work with the shop keepers and residents to improve the environment Special Add Farmhouse on Regina Added Y buildings Drive and Windmill Cottages

27

Section of Comments Amendments Proposed Amendments the Plan Made Other Wider roads thinner verges to This would be contrary to comments give more space to cars and the feedback from the buses community on creating a garden suburb

Ensure that Perry Hall Park is The NP seeks to do this enhanced to create more biodiversity and that the northside is retained for local residents on the south side for sport Stop fly tipping on this that Noted: Forum aware and Avenue seeks to address this.

5. Photos of Regulation 14 Consultation

28