Flock Formation and the Role of Plumage Colouration in Ardeidae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flock Formation and the Role of Plumage Colouration in Ardeidae 683 Flock formation and the role of plumage colouration in Ardeidae M. Clay Green and Paul L. Leberg Abstract: It has been hypothesized that white plumage facilitates flock formation in Ardeidae. We conducted four ex- periments using decoys to test factors involved in attracting wading birds to a specific pond. The first three experi- ments tested the effects of plumage colouration, flock size, and species-specific decoys on flock formation. The fourth experiment examined intraspecific differences in flock choice between the two colour morphs of the reddish egret, Egretta rufescens (Gmelin, 1789). Wading birds landed at flocks of decoys more often than single or no decoys (P < 0.001) but exhibited no overall attraction to white plumage (P > 0.05). White-plumaged species were attracted to white decoys (P < 0.001) and dark-plumaged species were attracted to dark decoys (P < 0.001). Snowy egrets (E. thula (Molina, 1782)), great egrets (Ardea alba L., 1758), and little blue herons (E. caerulea (L., 1758)) landed more often at ponds that contained decoys resembling conspecifics. At the intraspecific level, all observed reddish egrets selected flocks with like-plumaged decoys. Our results suggest that plumage colouration is an attractant for species with similar plumage, but white plumage is not an attractant for all wading bird species. White plumage may facilitate flock forma- tion in certain species but does not serve as a universal attractant for wading birds of varying plumage colouration and size. Résumé : On a avancé l’hypothèse qui veut que le plumage blanc des ardéidés facilite la formation des volées. Nous avons fait quatre expériences à l’aide de leurres afin de déterminer les facteurs impliqués dans l’attirance des échassiers pour un étang particulier. Les trois premières expériences vérifient les effets de la coloration du plumage, de la taille de la volée et des leurres spécifiques à l’espèce sur la formation des volées. La quatrième expérience examine les dif- férences intraspécifiques du choix de la volée chez deux morphes de couleurs différentes de l’aigrette roussâtre, Egretta rufescens (Gmelin, 1789). Les échassiers se posent plus fréquemment près de groupes de leurres que près de leurres isolés et que dans les sites sans leurres (P < 0,001); ils n’ont pas, cependant, d’attirance générale pour le plumage blanc (P > 0,05). Les espèces à plumage blanc sont attirées par les leurres blancs (P < 0,001) et celles à plumage foncé par les leurres foncés (P < 0,001). Les aigrettes neigeuses (E. thula (Molina, 1782)), les grandes aigrettes (Ardea alba L., 1758) et les aigrettes bleues (E. caerulea (L., 1758)) se posent plus souvent dans des étangs qui contiennent des leurres qui leur ressemblent. À l’échelle intraspécifique, toutes les aigrettes roussâtres ont choisi des groupes de leurres qui possèdent leur propre couleur de plumage. Nos résultats indiquent que la coloration du plumage attire les espèces de plumage semblable, mais que le plumage blanc n’attire pas toutes les espèces d’échassiers. Le plumage blanc peut faciliter la formation des volées chez certaines espèces, mais il n’attire pas de façon universelle tous les oi- seaux échassiers qui varient en taille et en couleur de plumage. [Traduit par la Rédaction] Green and Leberg 693 Introduction birds is the occurrence of species with all-white plumage in both sexes. The adaptive value of colouration in animals has been de- bated and studied intensively (Huxley 1938; Hamilton White plumage, although not absent in other bird orders, 1973). Cryptic colouration is common in some species of is prevalent in many species of waterbirds (Tickell 2003). In birds, presumably for concealment — either protection from the order Ciconiiformes, numerous groups of closely related predators or crypsis to prey (Gill 1990). Lack of crypsis in species differ considerably in plumage colouration (dark ver- birds is often associated with bright colouration in adults, sus white) (Sibley and Ahlquist 1990; Sheldon et al. 1995). which is used for mate attraction. In these mating systems, Within the family Ardeidae, six species exhibit two distinct one sex is usually brightly coloured while the opposite sex is colour morphs (dichromatism), where an individual is either dull in colour. One exception to plumage colouration in all white or dark-plumaged. Currently accepted phylogenies suggest that white plumage arose independently several times (Sibley and Ahlquist 1990; Sheldon et al. 1995). Nu- Received 21 October 2004. Accepted 28 April 2005. Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at merous hypotheses for the adaptive significance of white http://cjz.nrc.ca on 28 June 2005. plumage have been proposed, including crypsis to prey, thermoregulation, and sociality (Kushlan 1977; Ellis 1980; 1 M.C. Green and P.L. Leberg. Department of Biology, Mock 1980; Caldwell 1986; Tickell 2003). As part of an in- University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, vestigation into the ecological significance of white plumage USA. (Green 2003), this study focused on the influence of white 1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]). plumage on sociality in wading birds. Can. J. Zool. 83: 683–693 (2005) doi: 10.1139/Z05-058 © 2005 NRC Canada 684 Can. J. Zool. Vol. 83, 2005 Ciconiiformes often form large single- or mixed-species were drained annually in July and reflooded in October from aggregations for both foraging and nesting. Foraging aggre- the same water source (Bayou Teche). gations of wading birds may form for several reasons, in- Four sets of decoys and one control (no decoys) consti- cluding increased foraging success and reduced energy tuted the five treatments used in this experiment (Fig. 1). expenditure. Increased foraging success, or “positive inter- Our decoy sets were as follows: one great egret (white plum- ference” (see Mock 1980), refers to the situation where an age), one great blue heron (Ardea herodias L., 1758; dark individual’s foraging efficiency is significantly enhanced by plumage), five great egrets, and five great blue herons. All the presence of another forager. Foraging wading birds in decoys were commercially available, moulded plastic flocks may experience reduced energy expenditure owing to “heron” decoys of either great blue heron type or great egret a reduction in stepping rate (Kushlan 1978a) or the break- type (Cabellas Sporting Goods, Inc.). These decoys were down of territoriality (e.g., less energy expended chasing chosen because they were all similar in size, thereby control- conspecifics; Wiggins 1991). The formation of bird aggrega- ling for any “size” choice made by wading birds. The exper- tions may also occur for protection from predators. Flocking iment was conducted during April–May 2001. behaviour may enhance predator detection through shared Each day, treatments were randomly assigned to five adja- vigilance or by a dilution or confusion effect on the predator cent ponds. In the ponds assigned five decoys, the decoys (Hamilton 1971; Pulliam 1973). In Ardeidae, incidents of were placed 1 m apart. The decoys were set up before sun- predation are scant and anecdotal (Monson 1951; Lowe rise on each observation day. The observation period began 1954; Cottrille and Cottrille 1958), making it difficult to test at local sunrise and ended approximately 2 h later (e.g., whether predation is a major impetus for flocking in 0730 US Central Daylight Time (CDT) to 0930 CDT) or long-legged wading birds (Mock 1980; but see Caldwell when regular arrivals of birds from night roosts diminished. 1986). The observer (M.C.G.) was situated on a levee perpendicular Kushlan (1977) suggested that white plumage functions as to the ponds, approximately 50 m from the closest pond. The a signal for the formation of wading bird aggregations. He observer monitored all ponds and recorded the species and observed that significantly more wading birds were attracted time of arrival for each wading bird that landed in the ponds. to white decoys than to dark decoys, and he argued that Percent cloud cover was also recorded, as observations were white plumage might be a way of attracting other birds to grouped into “sunny” (<50% cloud cover) and “cloudy” foraging aggregations. All species attracted to the flocks (>50% cloud cover) days for analysis. Once the first bird were lumped together for the analysis and there was no dis- had landed at one of the ponds, all birds were flushed from cussion of which species (and hence plumage colours) were the area and the ponds were randomly assigned new treat- attracted to the white or dark flocks. Using snowy egret ments; no birds were present at the beginning of the next ob- (Egretta thula (Molina, 1782)), great egret (Ardea alba L., servation. Only the first bird arriving at a pond was used in 1758), and mixed flock (white and dark-plumaged birds) de- the analysis. Species that had fewer than five individuals coys, several studies (Caldwell 1981; Master 1992) have land at our ponds were dropped from our analyses. shown that snowy egrets are the “attractive force” in drawing We treated each landing by an individual bird as an inde- in several species of herons, regardless of plumage colour- pendent observation. The Crawfish Research Center is lo- ation. However, these studies failed to offer flocks of cated less than 16 km from several large rookeries (e.g., dark-plumaged decoys as an alternative choice to incoming Lake Martin, >15 000 breeding pairs) and roost sites, result- wading birds. ing in high densities of wading birds flying over and landing In this study, we examine the possible influences that at the research center (Martin and Lester 1990; M.C. Green, plumage colouration may have on flock formation in personal observation; J. Huner, personal communication). Ciconiiformes. We test the hypothesis that white plumage is This high number of overflying wading birds presumably more attractive than dark plumage to wading birds of both minimizes the chance of the same bird landing repeatedly at plumage colourations.
Recommended publications
  • Ardea Cinerea (Grey Heron) Family: Ardeidae (Herons and Egrets) Order: Ciconiiformes (Storks, Herons and Ibises) Class: Aves (Birds)
    UWU The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Behaviour Ardea cinerea (Grey Heron) Family: Ardeidae (Herons and Egrets) Order: Ciconiiformes (Storks, Herons and Ibises) Class: Aves (Birds) Fig. 1. Grey heron, Ardea cinerea. [http://www.google.tt/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bbc.co.uk/lancashire/content/images/2006/06/15/grey_heron, downloaded 14 November 2012] TRAITS. Grey herons are large birds that can be 90-100cm tall and an adult could weigh in at approximately 1.5 kg. They are identified by their long necks and very powerful dagger like bills (Briffett 1992). They have grey plumage with long black head plumes and their neck is white with black stripes on the front. In adults the forehead sides of the head and the centre of the crown are white. In flight the neck is folded back with the wings bowed and the flight feathers are black. Each gender looks alike except for the fact that females have shorter heads (Seng and Gardner 1997). The juvenile is greyer without black markings on the head and breast. They usually live long with a life span of 15-24 years. ECOLOGY. The grey heron is found in Europe, Asia and Africa, and has been recorded as an accidental visitor in Trinidad. Grey herons occur in many different habitat types including savannas, ponds, rivers, streams, lakes and temporary pools, coastal brackish water, wetlands, marsh and swamps. Their distribution may depend on the availability of shallow water (brackish, saline, fresh, flowing and standing) (Briffett 1992). They prefer areas with tall trees for nesting UWU The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Behaviour (arboreal rooster and nester) but if trees are unavailable, grey herons may roost in dense brush or undergrowth.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2
    IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2 Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group Djerba Island, Tunisia, 14th - 18th November 2018 Editors: Jocelyn Champagnon, Jelena Kralj, Luis Santiago Cano Alonso and K. S. Gopi Sundar Editors-in-Chief, Special Publications, IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group K.S. Gopi Sundar, Co-chair IUCN Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Luis Santiago Cano Alonso, Co-chair IUCN Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Invited Editors for this issue Jocelyn Champagnon, Tour du Valat, Research Institute for the Conservation of Mediterranean Wetlands, Arles, France Jelena Kralj, Institute of Ornithology, Zagreb, Croatia Expert Review Board Hichem Azafzaf, Association “les Amis des Oiseaux » (AAO/BirdLife Tunisia), Tunisia Petra de Goeij, Royal NIOZ, the Netherlands Csaba Pigniczki, Kiskunság National Park Directorate, Hungary Suggested citation of this publication: Champagnon J., Kralj J., Cano Alonso, L. S. & Sundar, K. S. G. (ed.) 2019. Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group. IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2. Arles, France. ISBN 978-2-491451-00-4. Recommended Citation of a chapter: Marion L. 2019. Recent trends of the breeding population of Spoonbill in France 2012- 2018. Pp 19- 23. In: Champagnon J., Kralj J., Cano Alonso, L. S. & Sundar, K. S. G. (ed.) Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group. IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2. Arles, France. INFORMATION AND WRITING DISCLAIMER The information and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Flamingo ABOUT the GROUP
    Flamingo ABOUT THE GROUP Bulletin of the IUCN-SSC/Wetlands International The Flamingo Specialist Group (FSG) was established in 1978 at Tour du Valat in France, under the leadership of Dr. Alan Johnson, who coordinated the group until 2004 (see profile at www.wetlands.org/networks/Profiles/January.htm). Currently, the group is FLAMINGO SPECIALIST GROUP coordinated from the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust at Slimbridge, UK, as part of the IUCN- SSC/Wetlands International Waterbird Network. The FSG is a global network of flamingo specialists (both scientists and non- scientists) concerned with the study, monitoring, management and conservation of the world’s six flamingo species populations. Its role is to actively promote flamingo research and conservation worldwide by encouraging information exchange and cooperation amongst these specialists, and with other relevant organisations, particularly IUCN - SSC, Ramsar, WWF International and BirdLife International. FSG members include experts in both in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) flamingo conservation, as well as in fields ranging from field surveys to breeding biology, diseases, tracking movements and data management. There are currently 165 members around the world, from India to Chile, and from France to South Africa. Further information about the FSG, its membership, the membership list serve, or this bulletin can be obtained from Brooks Childress at the address below. Chair Assistant Chair Dr. Brooks Childress Mr. Nigel Jarrett Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Slimbridge Glos. GL2 7BT, UK Glos. GL2 7BT, UK Tel: +44 (0)1453 860437 Tel: +44 (0)1453 891177 Fax: +44 (0)1453 860437 Fax: +44 (0)1453 890827 [email protected] [email protected] Eastern Hemisphere Chair Western Hemisphere Chair Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource-Dependent Weather Effect in the Reproduction of the White Stork Ciconia Ciconia
    Resource-dependent weather effect in the reproduction of the White Stork Ciconia ciconia Damijan Denac1 Denac D. 2006. Resource-dependent weather effect in the reproduction of the White Stork Ciconia ciconia. Ardea 94(2): 233–240. Weather affects the breeding success of White Stork Ciconia ciconia, but the effect has not been studied in the context of different food resources or habitat quality. The aim of this study was to determine whether the impact of weather conditions on breeding success was dependent on habitat quality. The effect of weather on reproduction was analysed in two populations that differed significantly in the availability of suitable feeding habitats. Multiple regression analyses revealed that of the weather variables analysed (average temperature and rainfall in April, May and June), rainfall in May and temperature in June explained a sig- nificant part of the variation in numbers of fledged chicks per pair, but only in the population with poorer food resources. The lack of weather influence in the population with richer food resources was tentatively explained by the larger brood sizes. More effective heat conservation in larger broods, and thus lower chick mortality during cold weather, could be the underlying mechanism for the different response to weather in the two populations. Key words: breeding success, Ciconia ciconia, habitat quality, resource dependent weather-effect, White Stork 1National Institute of Biology, Vecv na pot 111, SI–1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION optimal feeding habitats, whereas fields, especially cornfields, are suboptimal (Sackl 1987, Pinowski et The influences of food as a resource and weather al.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional List of Birds of the Rio Tahuauyo Areas, Loreto, Peru
    Provisional List of Birds of the Rio Tahuauyo areas, Loreto, Peru Compiled by Carol R. Foss, Ph.D. and Josias Tello Huanaquiri, Guide Status based on expeditions from Tahuayo Logde and Amazonia Research Center TINAMIFORMES: Tinamidae 1. Great Tinamou Tinamus major 2. White- throated Tinamou Tinamus guttatus 3. Cinereous Tinamou Crypturellus cinereus 4. Little Tinamou Crypturellus soui 5. Undulated Tinamou Crypturellus undulates 6. Variegated Tinamou Crypturellus variegatus 7. Bartlett’s Tinamou Crypturellus bartletti ANSERIFORMES: Anhimidae 8. Horned Screamer Anhima cornuta ANSERIFORMES: Anatidae 9. Muscovy Duck Cairina moschata 10. Blue-winged Teal Anas discors 11. Masked Duck Nomonyx dominicus GALLIFORMES: Cracidae 12. Spix’s Guan Penelope jacquacu 13. Blue-throated Piping-Guan Pipile cumanensis 14. Speckled Chachalaca Ortalis guttata 15. Wattled Curassow Crax globulosa 16. Razor-billed Curassow Mitu tuberosum GALLIFORMES: Odontophoridae 17. Marbled Wood-Quall Odontophorus gujanensis 18. Starred Wood-Quall Odontophorus stellatus PELECANIFORMES: Phalacrocoracidae 19. Neotropic Cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus PELECANIFORMES: Anhingidae 20. Anhinga Anhinga anhinga CICONIIFORMES: Ardeidae 21. Rufescent Tiger-Heron Tigrisoma lineatum 22. Agami Heron Agamia agami 23. Boat-billed Heron Cochlearius cochlearius 24. Zigzag Heron Zebrilus undulatus 25. Black-crowned Night-Heron Nycticorax nycticorax 26. Striated Heron Butorides striata 27. Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis 28. Cocoi Heron Ardea cocoi 29. Great Egret Ardea alba 30. Cappet Heron Pilherodius pileatus 31. Snowy Egret Egretta thula 32. Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea CICONIIFORMES: Threskiornithidae 33. Green Ibis Mesembrinibis cayennensis 34. Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja CICONIIFORMES: Ciconiidae 35. Jabiru Jabiru mycteria 36. Wood Stork Mycteria Americana CICONIIFORMES: Cathartidae 37. Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura 38. Lesser Yellow-headed Vulture Cathartes burrovianus 39.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year Following Egrets
    ❚ 10 The Ardeid ❚■ Insights from birds with GPS tags A Year Following Egrets by David Lumpkin o a Great Egret (Ardea alba), Tomales Bay the deployment of our tags, all three Tis full of food, but that food is not always egrets remained near Toms Point in available. Every two weeks, around the full northern Tomales Bay, where we and new moons, the lowest tides and greatest could regularly download data foraging opportunity coincide with the early with the handheld receiver Figure 1. Egret 9 flying over Cypress morning, making breakfast on the bay an easy then eagerly rush back Grove the day after it was captured in affair. During low tides, hundreds of acres of to the office to upload September 2018. intertidal eelgrass are exposed, allowing egrets the data to a computer to stab at herring during spawning events or and see what the birds had been doing. About a to hunt pipefish, which try to wrap themselves month after tagging, suddenly two of the three a freshwater pond at Toms Point. I watched around the egret’s bill to avoid being swal- egrets could no longer be found on Tomales him forage there several times. Though this lowed. As the tide cycle shifts and morning tides Bay. Worried something might have happened pond was well covered by aquatic plants, he was become higher, the eelgrass is exposed for fewer to them, and perplexed that they might leave an consistently able to find small fish, picking them hours per day, reducing foraging opportunities area where they likely had active nests, I drove out from tiny gaps in foliage.
    [Show full text]
  • Roseate Spoonbill Breeding in Camden County: a First State Nesting Record for Georgia
    vol. 76 • 3 – 4 THE ORIOLE 65 ROSEATE SPOONBILL BREEDING IN CAMDEN COUNTY: A FIRST STATE NESTING RECORD FOR GEORGIA Timothy Keyes One Conservation Way Brunswick, GA 31520 [email protected] Chris Depkin One Conservation Way Brunswick, GA 31520 [email protected] Jessica Aldridge 6222 Charlie Smith Sr. Hwy St. Marys, GA 31558 [email protected] Introduction We report the northernmost breeding record of Roseate Spoonbill (Platalea ajaja) on the Atlantic Coast of the U.S. Nesting activity has been suspected in Georgia for at least 5 years, but was first confirmed in June 2011 at a large wading bird colony in St. Marys, Camden County, Georgia. Prior to this record, the furthest northern breeding record for Roseate Spoonbill was in St. Augustine, St. John’s County, Florida, approximately 100 km to the south. This record for Georgia continues a trend of northward expansion of Roseate Spoonbill post-breeding dispersal and breeding ranges. Prior to the plume-hunting era of the mid to late 1800s, the eastern population of Roseate Spoonbill was more abundant and widespread than it is today (Dumas 2000), breeding across much of south Florida. Direct persecution and collateral disturbance by egret plume hunters led to a significant range contraction between 1850 and the 1890s (Allen 1942), limiting the eastern population of Roseate Spoonbills to a few sites in Florida Bay by the 1940s. A low of 15 nesting pairs were documented in 1936 (Powell et al. 1989). By the late 1960s, Roseate Spoonbills began to expand out of Florida Bay, slowly reclaiming some of the territory they had lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Egret Ardea Alba
    Great Egret Ardea alba Joe Kosack/PGC Photo CURRENT STATUS: In Pennsylvania, the great egret is listed state endangered and protected under the Game and Wildlife Code. Nationally, they are not listed as an endangered/threatened species. All migra- tory birds are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. POPULATION TREND: The Pennsylvania Game Commission counts active great egret (Ardea alba) nests in every known colony in the state every year to track changes in population size. Since 2009, only two nesting locations have been active in Pennsylvania: Kiwanis Lake, York County (fewer than 10 pairs) and the Susquehanna River’s Wade Island, Dauphin County (fewer than 200 pairs). Both sites are Penn- sylvania Audubon Important Bird Areas. Great egrets abandoned other colonies along the lower Susque- hanna River in Lancaster County in 1988 and along the Delaware River in Philadelphia County in 1991. Wade Island has been surveyed annually since 1985. The egret population there has slowly increased since 1985, with a high count of 197 nests in 2009. The 10-year average count from 2005 to 2014 was 159 nests. First listed as a state threatened species in 1990, the great egret was downgraded to endan- gered in 1999. IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTICS: Great egrets are almost the size of a great blue heron (Ardea herodias), but white rather than gray-blue. From bill to tail tip, adults are about 40 inches long. The wingspan is 55 inches. The plumage is white, bill yellowish, and legs and feet black. Commonly confused species include cattle egret (Bubulus ibis), snowy egret (Egretta thula), and juvenile little blue herons (Egretta caerulea); however these species are smaller and do not nest regularly in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • The Voice and First Nesting Records of the Zigzag Heron in Ecuador
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 661 Wilson Bull., 103(4), 1991, pp. 661-664 The voice and first nesting records of the Zigzag Heron in Ecuador.-Recent sightingsof the little-known Zigzag Heron (Zebrilus undulutus) have come primarily from Peru, as reported by Mathews and Brooke (Wilson Bull., 100:147-148, 1988) and by Davis et al. (Condor, 82:460-46 1, 1980). Neither Hilty and Brown (A Guide to the Birds of Colombia, Princeton Univ. Press, 1986, p. 68) nor Hancock and Kushlan (The Herons Handbook, Harper and Row, New York, 1984, pp. 230-232) mention any recordednests of this species. Here we report on five nests that we found at La Selva Lodge (00”24’S, 76”39’W), approx- imately 100 km by river down the Napo River (Rio Napo) from the town of Coca, Napo Province, Ecuador, elevation 280 m. La Selva Lodge is located in an area of undisturbedlowland rainforest on the north bank of the Napo River. There are two oxbow lakeswith substantiallakeside vegetation separated by 1 km of rarely flooded upper vurzeu. One of the lakes, Garzacocha, is dominated by overhangingtrees and drains into Heliconia-dominated varzea. The other lake, Mandicocha, is dominated by manglar trees (Coussapoa trinervia, Moraceae) and is connected to the Napo by two flowing streams,one at each end. Sightingsof Zigzag Herons in this area have become quite frequent in recent years, with both adults and immatures found calling at dawn and dusk. These individuals prefer the edgesof oxbow lakes thick with low fringing vegetation,especially fallen treesat the water’s edge,and that are surroundedby undisturbed forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Order CICONIIFORMES: Herons, Ibises and Allies Suborder ARDEAE
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 156-158. Order CICONIIFORMES: Herons, Ibises and Allies We recognise only herons, ibises and their allies as members of the Ciconiiformes, following Cracraft et al. (2004) who showed that the use of Ciconiiformes to include most of the non-passerines, sensu Sibley & Monroe (1990), is untenable as the taxon is then paraphyletic. Suborder ARDEAE: Herons, Bitterns and Allies Family ARDEIDAE Leach: Herons and Bitterns Subfamily ARDEINAE Leach: Herons and Egrets Ardeidae Leach, 1820: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 17th Edition, London:69 – Type genus Ardea, Linnaeus 1758. Ardeid taxonomy is unstable at present. Two major papers (McCracken & Sheldon 1998, Sheldon et al. 2000) showed that traditional arrangements may be flawed, but failed to recommend viable alternatives. The arrangement below reflects recent consensus (Martínez-Vilalta & Motis 1992, Dickinson 2003, Kushlan & Hancock 2005). Casmerodius was formerly regarded as a distinct genus (e.g. Pinto 1938, Hellmayr & Conover 1948, Phelps & Phelps 1958, Meyer de Schauensee 1970, AOU 1983), but morphometrics (Payne & Risley 1976), vocal analyses (McCracken & Sheldon 1997), and genetic data (Sheldon 1987, Sheldon et al. 1995, McCracken & Sheldon 1998) do not support its separation from Ardea. Some classifications (e.g. Blake 1977) have placed Ardea alba in Egretta, but we follow Sheldon (1987), Sheldon et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Blue Heron Facts
    Great Blue Heron At a Glance How can a great blue heron be distinguished from other birds? Scientific Name: Ardea herodias The great blue heron is a large iconic bird of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The body of the great blue heron is long and narrow covered Body Length: 63 inches in grayish feathers. They have a long grayish neck that can help identify Wingspan: 72 inches them when they are flying. Its head consists of a large black “eyebrow”, yellow to red eyes, and a very long bill with at least some yellow to it. Weight: 4-6 lbs. What do great blue herons eat? Avg. Lifespan: 15 years The diet of the great blue heron consists mostly of fish - any species large Diet: mostly fish, but will also eat enough that it can catch and eat. Blue herons have also been known to amphibians, reptiles, and invertebrates eat amphibians, reptiles, invertebrates, small mammals, and even small birds. Their diet is not picky and they eat basically anything that they can Habitat: swamps, marshes, rivers, swallow. lakes, almost anyplace with fresh to brackish water What predators do great blue herons have? Reproduction: lays 3-5 pale blue eggs Crows and raccoons eat great blue heron eggs. Raccoons, hawks, eagles, Incubation Period: 25-29 days and raccoons occasionally prey on adults and chicks. However, in general Nestling Period: 60 days great blue heron adults are not commonly preyed on due to their large size and the lack of many large predators in North America. Population Status: Least Concern Where do great blue herons live? Great blue herons are found in most of North and Central America.
    [Show full text]