The Anthropology of Economy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Anthropology of Economy The Anthropology of Economy Community, Market, and Culture Stephen Gudeman BLACI<WELL l3 Publishers Copyright© Stephen Gudeman 2001 The right of Stephen Gudeman to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. First published 2001 2 4 6 8 10 9 7 5 3 1 Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Malden, Massachusetts 02148 USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford OX4 1JF UK All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, withotlt the prior permission of the publisher. Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been applied for. ISBN 0-631-22566-8 (hardback); 0-63 1-22567-6 (paperback) British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset in 10.5 on 12 pt Sabon by Ace Filmsetting Ltd, Frome, Somerset Printed in Great Britain by TJ International, Padstow, Cornwall This book is printed on acid-free paper. Contents Acknowledgments vii 1 Community, Market, and Culture 1 The Values of Economy 5 Two Transaction Realms 9 Commensuration: Panama in the 1960s 12 Separations and Dialectics: Other Perspectives 15 From Community to Globalization 20 2 Economy at the Base 25 The Base 27 Common Constructions 34 Situated Reason 38 Self-sufficiency 43 A Fragmented World 47 3 Sharing the Base 52 Allotment 53 From Stock to Flow 55 Apportionment 56 Reallocating the Base 57 Sharing and Social Value 58 Reapportionment and Exchange Rates: Aristotle's Solution 60 Managing Generosity at Home 63 4 The Great Estate: Power, Extraction, and Expansion 68 Models and Historical Change 69 vi CONTENTS Self-sufficiency, Rations, and Reason 75 Contemporary Estates 78 5 Reciprocity and the Gift: Extending the Base 80 Genealogies of the Gift 81 Extending and Retracting the Base 86 Sister-Exchange 90 The Badge of Society 92 6 Trade and Profit 94 The Trade Domain 94 The Puzzle of Profit 97 A Theory of Profit 102 Accumulation 104 7 Profit on the Small 110 A Potter's Profit 110 Innovation in Groups 113 Extending the Base and Profit 116 Profit, Base, and Capital 117 8 Realms and Dialectics: Values in Production, Trade, and Use . 121 From Base to Base: Tra nsforming Objects, Relationships, and Trade 122 From Base to Capital: Appropriation, Production, Trade 126 From Capital to Base: Resilience and Resista nce 132 Trade Within the Base: Circuits and Budgets 133 The Base in Trade 137 9 Political Economy Today 144 Innovating Relations 146 The Rationality of Capitalism and Socialism 149 The Questions Today 155 References 165 Index 183 Acknowledgments I began research for this book while on a single quarter leave from the University of Minnesota, and I am grateful to the University as well as the College of Liberal Arts for their support in the past years. The initial draft of the book was written during the year I was a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences; I thank the Center for that special opportunity, and the National Science Founda­ tion for financial support (grant #SES-9022192). The book's thesis - that we live in multiple communities which nour­ ish endeavors - is supported by its own history, for I am indebted to many colleagues and friends. My special thanks go to Alberto Rivera, with whom I have undertaken fieldwork in Colombia and Guate­ mala. We have published articles and a book together, but that public authorship does not sufficiently express my debt to him. The eth­ nography on Guatemala and Colombia comes from our shared field­ work, which he has allowed me to use, and I have gained enormously from our many discussions about the ethnography and larger issues. In June 1995, Arjo Klamer and Phil Mirowski spent a humid weekend in Minneapolis while we discussed economic anthropology; they will recognize themes from that conversation in this volume. In the past decade, I have also had excellent discussions with scholars from other disciplines, and I thank Jack Amariglio, Stephen Cullenberg, Antonio Callari, J. K. Gibson-Graham, Larry Lohmann, Deidre McCloskey, John Richards, David Ruccio, Vernon Ruttan, and James Scott. I also owe special thanks and appreciation to Frederique Appfel­ Marglin and Stephen Marglin for their support and suggestions. In anthropology, I have received encouragement, interest, references, cri­ tique, and suggestive ideas from Nurit Bird-David, James Carrier, Scarlett Epstein, Arturo Escobar, Adam Kuper, Keith Hart, Michael Herzfeld, Alf Hornborg, Mark Mosko, Ben Orlove, Gfsli Palsson, Rick Shweder, and Richard Wille My Minnesota colleagues John Ingham and Mischa Penn have been ever-supportive, and I appreciate their viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS help and good colleagueship. At Minnesota, I also want to thank Amy Porter and Kathleen Saunders. At home, Roxane, Rebecca, Elise, and Keren have been great commentators, listeners, and readers over long periods of time. The author and publishers are grateful to several sources for per­ mission to reuse previously published material: some of the material in chapter 7 was first presented in my 1992 article, "Remodeling the House of Economics: Culture and Innovation," American Ethnolo­ gist, vol. 19, no. 1: 141-54; an earlier version of some of the informa­ tion offered in chapters 1, 2, 7, and 8 was published in Stephen Gudeman and Alberto Rivera, "Sustaining the Community, Resisting the Market: Guatemalan Perspectives," in john F. Richards (ed.), Land, Property and the Environment (Oakland: ICS Press); a version of chap­ ter 5 was published as "The Postmodern Gift," in Stephen Cullenberg, Jack Amariglio, and David Ruccio (eds), Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge (London: Routledge, 2001). Chapter One Community, Market, and Culture Economic anthropology attends to industrial life as well as ethnographic: situations, because comparable processes in securing and managin valued things are found everywhere. But economy, which revolves about making, holding, using, sharing, exchanging, and accumulating val­ ued objects and services, includes more than standard market theoryJ suggests. Anthropology plays a special role in broadening our under­ standing of material life, for the less-recognized processes are displayed with special clarity in the situations ethnographers study. In this book I offer a cross-cultural model of economy drawn from anthropology, written theories, and contemporary life. My purpose is to develop a lexicon or language for discussing economic processes as well as en­ vironmental, welfare, distributional, and other contemporary issues. I argue that economy consists of two realms, which I call community v and market. Both facets make up economy, for humans are motivated by social fulfillment, curiosity, and the pleasure of mastery, as well as instrumental purpose, competition, and the accumulation of gains. By community, I refer to real, on-the-ground associations and to imag­ ined solidarities that people experience. Market designates anonymous, short-term exchanges. We might call these two aspects of economy, the Up-close and the Far-distant. In one guise, economy is local and specific, constituted through social relationships and contextually de­ fined values. In the other, it is impersonal, even global, and abstracted from social context; this dimension consists of separated but interact­ ing agents. Both realms are ever-present but we bring now one, now the other into the foreground in practice and ideology. The relation­ ship is complex: sometimes the two faces of economy are separated, at other times they are mutually dependent, opposed or interactive. But always their shifting relation is filled with tension. This book is about the dialectical relation of economy's two realms. I shall especially try to portray the multiplicity of the community realm with its grounding in local values, and show how it and market 2 COMMUNITY, MARKET, AND CULTURE are connected in institutions and practices. The motor of capitalism is profit-making, but I shall suggest that even the most market-driven actor - the national or global corporation - mixes the two realms and relies on the presence of communal relations and resources for its suc­ cess. Economic anthropology, I think, uniquely displays the double face of economy and the importance of the up-close. The politics of this book stem from this demonstration of the importance of the com­ munal realm, thus obliging us to rethink our ways of distributing new wealth. I arrived at this model slowly, for, as I found in the course of my studies, economic anthropology itself is divided theoretically. My own intellectual trail led me right through the discipline's conflicting theo­ retical perspectives, because each time I thought I had solved a puzzle in economic anthropology, the answer prompted new questions that led to a shift in my course and to fresh inquiries about the connections between sociality and impersonal exchange. A brief recounting of these experiences and perplexities provides a miniature map of the field and its fissures. My first research, in the 1960s, was carried out in a small village of rural Panama. I went there filled with confidence that my business school training in decision theory and game theory, combined with anthropology, would yield deep insights into the local economy. Wear­ ing the hat of a neoclassical economist, I intended to apply concepts from the theory of markets to the activities of subsistence farmers.1 My goal was to elicit their agricultural choices and plot them on deci­ sion trees, attaching their subjective valuations and probabilities to the outcomes.
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Livelihood Approach: a Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice
    Sustainable Livelihood Approach: A critical analysis of theory and practice. Stephen Morse, Nora McNamara and Moses Acholo Geographical Paper No. 189 Sustainable Livelihood Approach: A critical analysis of theory and practice. Geographical Paper No. 189 Stephen Morse Department of Geography, University of Reading, UK [email protected] Nora McNamara and Moses Acholo Diocesan Development Services (DDS), Idah, Kogi State, Nigeria November 2009 Series Editor: A.M.Mannion [email protected] 1 Contents Section Page number 1. Introduction 4 2. The SLA context; two villages in Nigeria. 16 3. The SLA space 18 4. Practice of SLA 21 5. Human capital: the households 23 6. Natural capital: land and farming 29 7. Natural capital: Trees 37 8. Social capital: Networks 40 9. Physical capital: assets for income generation 44 10. Financial capital: household budgets 52 11. Vulnerability context 56 12. Did SLA succeed? 58 13. Some conclusions 63 14. Acknowledgements 64 15. References 64 2 Abstract Sustainable Livelihood Analysis (SLA) has since the 1990s become the dominant approach to the implementation of development interventions by a number of major international agencies. It is defined in terms of the ability of a social unit to enhance its assets and capabilities in the face of shocks and stresses over time. SLA first seeks to identify the important assets in livelihood, their trends over time and space as well as the nature and impacts of shocks and stresses (environmental, economic and social) upon these assets. Following this, and after taking cognisance of the wider context (e.g. political, legal, economic, institutions, infrastructure etc.), interventions are designed to address any vulnerability of enhance livelihoods perhaps by diversification of income streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology of Food and Nutrition Spring 2017 Syllabus Provisional Update
    Nutrition 330: Anthropology of Food and Nutrition Spring 2017 Syllabus Provisional Update Class Meetings: Wednesday, 3:15-6:15 pm in Jaharis 155 Instructor: Ellen Messer, PhD (http://www.nutrition.tufts.edu/faculty/messer-ellen) Contact: [email protected] Office Hours: TBA Tufts Graduate Credit: 1 cr. Prerequisites: Some social science background Course Description: This course provides an advanced introduction to anthropological theory and methods designed for food and nutrition science and policy graduate students. Section 1 covers anthropology's four-field modes of inquiry, cross-cutting theoretical approaches and thematic interest groups, their respective institutions and intellectual concerns. Section 2 demonstrates applications of these concepts and methods to cutting-edge food and nutrition issues. Assignments and activities incorporate background readings, related discussions, and short writing assignments, plus an anthropological literature review on a focused food and nutrition project, relevant to their particular interests. The course overall encourages critical thinking and scientific assessment of anthropology's evidence base, analytical tools, logic, and meaning-making, in the context of contributions to multi-disciplinary research and policy teams. Weekly 3-hour sessions feature an introductory overview lecture, student-facilitated discussion of readings, and professor-moderated debate or exercise illustrating that week's themes. Throughout the term, participants keep a written reading log (critical response diary), to be handed in week 3 and 6. In lieu of a mid-term exam, there are two 2-page graded written essay assignments, due weeks 4 and 8. The term-long food-and nutrition proposal- writing project will explore anthropological literature on a focused food and nutrition question, with an outline due week 9, and a short literature review and annotated bibliography due week 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Own and Be Owned Archaeological Approaches to the Concept of Possession
    Own and be owned Archaeological approaches to the concept of possession P AG – Postdoctoral Archaeological Group Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson (Eds) Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 62, 2015 Own and be owned Archaeological approaches to the concept of possession © 2015 by PAG – Postdoctoral Archaeological Group, and the authors Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm www.archaeology.su.se Editors: Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson English revision: Kristin Bornholdt Collins Cover and typography: Anna Röst, Karneol form & kommunikation Printed by Publit, Stockholm, Sweden 2015 ISSN 0349-4128 ISBN 978-91-637-8212-1 Contents Preface vii Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson Introduction: the nature of belongings 1 Alison Klevnäs Things of quality: possessions and animated objects in the Scandinavian Viking Age 23 Nanouschka Myrberg Burström The skin I live in. The materiality of body imagery 49 Fredrik Fahlander To own and be owned: the warriors of Birka’s garrison 73 Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson The propriety of decorative luxury possessions. Reflections on the occurrence of kalathiskos dancers and pyrrhic dancers in Roman visual culture 93 Julia Habetzeder Hijacked by the Bronze Age discourse? A discussion of rock art and ownership 109 Per Nilsson Capturing images: knowledge, ownership and the materiality of cave art 133 Magnus Ljunge Give and take: grave goods and grave robbery in the early middle ages 157 Alison Klevnäs Possession through deposition: the 'ownership' of coins in contemporary British coin-trees 189 Ceri Houlbrook Possession, property or ownership? 215 Chris Gosden About the authors 222 Things of quality: possessions and animated objects in the Scandinavian Viking Age Nanouschka M.
    [Show full text]
  • Features of Gift Exchange in Market Economy
    UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE ANDREJ RUS FEATURES OF GIFT EXCHANGE IN MARKET ECONOMY LASTNOSTI EKONOMIJE DARU V TRŽNI EKONOMIJI DOKTORSKA DISERTACIJA DOCTORAL THESIS Mentor: prof. dr. Vesna V. Godina Somentor: prof. dr. Josephus D. M. Platenkamp LJUBLJANA, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I would like to thank my mentors dr. Vesna Godina and dr. Jos Platenkamp for their indispensable help and guidance. I would also like to thank to dr. Zlatko Jančič for his comments, which notably improved this thesis. I am also very grateful to Katja Vukčevič and Janez Kne for their really valuable ideas and suggestions in the process of conceiving this thesis. Last but not least, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my family: Darja, Katja and Arjan for their unconditional support and patience. IZJAVA O AVTORSTVU Spodaj podpisani Andrej Rus, z vpisno številko 21041310, Sem avtor doktorskega dela z naslovom: Features of gift exchange in market economy (Lastnosti ekonomije daru v tržni ekonomiji). S svojim podpisom zagotavljam, da: • je predložena doktorska disertacija izključno rezultat mojega raziskovalnega dela; • sem poskrbel, da so dela in mnenja drugih avtorjev oz. avtoric, ki jih uporabljam v predloženem delu, navedena oz. citirana v skladu s fakultetnimi navodili; • sem poskrbel, da so vsa dela in mnenja drugih avtorjev oz. avtoric navedena v seznamu virov, ki je sestavni element predloženega dela in je zapisan v skladu s fakultetnimi navodili; • sem pridobil vsa dovoljenja za uporabo avtorskih del, ki so v celoti prenesena v predloženo delo in sem to tudi jasno zapisal v predloženem delu; • se zavedam, da je plagiatorstvo – predstavljanje tujih del, bodisi v obliki citata bodisi v obliki skoraj dobesednega prafraziranja bodisi v grafični obliki, s katerim so tuje misli oz.
    [Show full text]
  • Inalienable Wealth in Forster's Howards
    Inalienable Wealth in Forster’s Howards End In my presentation, I will focus on inherited objects in E. M. Forster’s Howards End (1910). My main focus will be on how Forster portrays inheritance in Edwardian England and it is my claim that Howards End can be read as Forster’s attempt to rescue the ‘society of inheritance’ (concept borrowed from Thomas Piketty) by moving the focus from inherited wealth to inherited values. My analysis is focusing on the house of Howards End in particular and I will argue that the house is an ‘inalienable object’. I have borrowed the concept of inalienable objects from anthropology and I have attached an article about the concept written by Carolyn Folkman Curasi, Linda L. Price and Eric J. Arnould. I have, furthermore, selected some short text passages to illustrate some of the points, I will make in my presentation. For those of you who have not read the novel, I have also attached a plot summary from Wikipedia. References Curasi, Carolyn Folkman, Linda L. Price & Eric J. Arnould, “How Individuals’ Cherished Possessions Become Families’ Inalienable Wealth,” Journal of Consumer Research Vol. 31 (December 2004): 609- 622 Forster, E. M., Howards End, London: Penguin English Library, 2012. Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014 Quotes Chapter 3 “She [Ruth Wilcox] seemed to belong not to the young people and their motor, but to the house, and to the tree that overshadowed it. One knew that she worshipped the past, and that the instinctive wisdom the past can alone bestow had descended upon her – that wisdom to which we give the clumsy name of aristocracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Gift Exchange and Living-Related Kidney Transplantation in the Philippines
    Repaying and Cherishing the Gift of Life: Gift Exchange and Living-related Kidney Transplantation in the Philippines Yosuke Shimazono ABSTRACT: This paper considers living-related kidney transplantation, especially that between family members in the Philippines. Drawing on the anthropological theory of gift, it explores two aspects of the gift relationship—the relationship between the do- nor and the recipient and the relationship between the recipient and the object—and describes two categories of acts—‘acknowledging the debt/repaying the gift of life’ and ‘taking care of a kidney/cherishing the gift’. This paper seeks to show that there is an internal tension in live kidney transplantation between two rival principles of gift operative in the world of Filipino family and kinship: one akin to the Maussian or ‘ar- chaic’ gift and the other that places cherishing of the gift over repaying of the debt. KEYWORDS: ‘archaic’ gift exchange, family, gift, kidney transplantation, Marcel Mauss, Philippines In his seminal essay, The Gift, Mauss attempted is to make a present of some part of oneself’ to unravel the common principles running (1990: 16). The objects given are typically the through gift exchange practices in societies important substance and being of the indi- which he termed ‘archaic’—Melanesia, Poly- vidual and/or group. Even after being given nesia and the Pacific Northwest (Mauss 1990). away, they still bear the ‘stamp of those who According to Mauss and his successors, gift possessed it previously’ (Carrier 1994: 25). exchange as practised in these societies was According to Weiner and Godelier, they are characterised by two major elements that are ‘inalienable possessions’, which cannot com- intertwined: the obligatory transfer of the ob- pletely be alienated; the original owner retains ject and the inalienability of the object.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Wealth and Exchange in the Gospels and First
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 10, Number 1 (Spring 2007): 85–114 Copyright © 2007 A “Marketless World”? An Examination of Wealth and Exchange in the Edd S. Noell Gospels and First- Professor of Economics Department of Economics and Business Century Palestine Westmont College Research on the economic context of Jesus’ teaching on wealth and exchange points to the need to take into account the nature and extent of market arrangements in first-century Roman Palestine. This context involves changing relations among reciprocity, redistribution, and market exchange. Studies of the relevant archeo- logical evidence point to intra- and inter-regional trade, increasing specialization, and monetization. This article claims that in the Gospels we find Jesus recogniz- ing a growing role for market exchange and a legitimate pursuit of economic gain through risk-taking alongside of the need for the practice of general reciprocity. Perceived hostility toward wealth and market exchange is explained in terms of the institutional features of the Palestinian agrarian economy, including extractive wealth transfer by the Roman state and religious authorities. The article concludes that Jesus’ teachings on wealth and market exchange have greater moral relevance to modern economic life than is commonly thought. Introduction Christian moral philosophers, theologians, and economists in the twenty-first century face a special challenge in reflecting upon and applying the teachings of Jesus on wealth and possessions. In attempting to speak to a culture preoccupied with material prosperity, a prosperity largely linked to the modern reliance upon specialization, innovation, and private contracting conducted through market institutions, we draw upon the New Testament gospels.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulativeindex
    Cumulative Index Edited by Mary Ellin D'Agostino with Robert V. Kemper (volumes 1-40) Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers Number 78, 1995 The Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, Number 79 C 1995 Kroeber Anthropological Society Mary Ellin D'Agostino, Editor Membership: Subscription is by membership in the Kroeber Anthropological Society. Dues for student members are $18.00, for regular members (including institutions) are $20.00, and all foreign subscribers $24.00 in US currency. Back issues ofthe Papers are available for $12.00 per issue plus $2.00 shipping and handling in the United States, Mexico, and Canada; foreign orders should add $4.00 shipping and handling. Prices subject to change without notice. Informationfor authors: The Kroeber Anthropological Society publishes articles in the general field of anthropology. In addition to articles oftheoretical interest, the Papers welcome descriptive studies putting factual information on record and historical documents ofanthropological interest. The society welcomes student research papers ofhigh quality. Submitted papers should not exceed 30 typewritten, double spaced pages and conform to the style used by the American Anthropological Association. Two paper copies and one computer copy ofthe manuscript should be submitted. Computer copies should be on 3V/2" diskette in formatted for either Mac or DOS, text should be in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, or plain (ASCII) text format. Email submissions are acceptable, but should be followed up with regular mail. All inquiries should be sent to: Kroeber Anthropological Society Department ofAnthropology University of Califomia Berkeley, CA 94720-3710 email: kasgqal.berkeley.edu Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, No. 78, 1995 Cumulative Index Edited by Mary Ellin D 'Agostino with Robert V Kemper (volumes 1-40) First published in 1950, the Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers is the oldest student run, student edited anthropologyjournal in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 314131983.Pdf
    Economic Anthropology History, Ethl:)ography, Critique Chris Han� and Keith Hart 'I Dolity ' II ' I I Copyright© Chris Hann and Keith Hart 2011 The right of Chris Hann and Keith Hart to be identified as Authors ofthis Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act Contents 1988. First published in 2011 by Polity Press Reprinted in 2011 Polity Press 65 Bridge Street Cambridge CB2 1 UR, UK Polity Press Preface lX 350 Main Street Malden, MA 02148, USA 1 Introduction: Economic Anthropology 1 3 All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose Some Issues of Method 'r of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored 'I 6 :,1, The Human Economy in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, Critical Anthropology 9 mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission Organization of the Book 15 of the publisher. 2 Economy from the Ancient World to the Age of the ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4482-0 Internet 18 ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4483-7(pb) 'I 1 8 I, Economy as Household Management Medieval and Early Modern Roots of Economic A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Theory 20 24 Typeset in 11 on 13 pt Sabon The Rise of Political Economy by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire The Economic Anthropology of Karl Marx 27 Printed and bound in the United States by Odyssey Press Inc., Gonic, New Hampshire National Capitalism and Beyond 29 Conclusion 34 The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external 3 The Rise of Modern Economics and Anthropology 37 websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to The German Tradition 39 press.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Heritage Making in Contemporary Spain Author(S): Jaume Franquesa Source: Current Anthropology, Vol
    On Keeping and Selling: The Political Economy of Heritage Making in Contemporary Spain Author(s): Jaume Franquesa Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. 3 (June 2013), pp. 346-369 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/670620 . Accessed: 20/05/2013 16:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 137.108.145.45 on Mon, 20 May 2013 16:27:51 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 346 Current Anthropology Volume 54, Number 3, June 2013 On Keeping and Selling The Political Economy of Heritage Making in Contemporary Spain by Jaume Franquesa In recent years, heritage has become a hegemonic idiom helping to legitimize, but also resist, the gentrification and private appropriation of urban space in a global conjuncture dominated by neoliberal policies and voracious real estate pressures. Through the analysis of a conflict around a historical building in a gentrifying neighborhood in Palma (Spain), and drawing on recent contributions analyzing the processual character of cultural heritage as well as on Annette Weiner’s theoretical insights on inalienability, the article explores the economic logic that underpins this hegemonic character of heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Ecosystem Services Valuation Reflect Local Cultural
    Economic Anthropology 2018 DOI:10.1002/sea2.12128 Does ecosystem services valuation reflect local cultural valuations? Comparative analysis of resident perspectives in four major urban river ecosystems Margaret V. du Bray1, Rhian Stotts2, Melissa Beresford2, Amber Wutich2, & Alexandra Brewis2 1 Environmental Studies, Augustana College, Rock Island, IL 61201, USA 2 School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA Corresponding author: Margaret du Bray; e-mail: [email protected] Anthropologists have long considered how people create and perceive the value of goods and services. While valuation of nature as a commodity is one means of conservation, locally resonant values of nature may not follow market logic. We apply the ecosystem services valuation (ESV) framework to four major urban river ecosystems (Australia, New Zealand, United States, and United Kingdom) to compare and contrast value (the alienable goods that are readily commodified and monetized) and values (the inalienable goods and rights that defy easy comparability and recognition). In interviews, respondents (N = 283) living near the rivers described the local river-associated ecosystem services (ES) they experienced. Thematic content analysis of coded interview data showed that respondents in all four sites recognize ES in their local areas related to rivers, and these resonate with the value-oriented ESV frameworks. While the ESV framework offers a way for scholars and policymakers to easily compare the monetary value of ES, our results indicate that rivers have locally ascribed value that defies easy commodification. In particular, our work highlights the local importanceof priceless, inalienable values perceived to be conferred across ES and not just restricted to cultural services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncertain Consequences of the Socialist Pursuit of Certainty: the Case of Uyghur Villagers in Eastern Xinjiang, China Antípoda
    Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología ISSN: 1900-5407 [email protected] Universidad de Los Andes Colombia Hann, Chris The Uncertain Consequences of the Socialist Pursuit of Certainty: The Case of Uyghur Villagers in Eastern Xinjiang, China Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, núm. 17, julio-diciembre, 2013, pp. 79-105 Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81429096005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative THE UNCertaIN CoNseQUENCes of THE SOCIalIst PUrsUIT of CertaINTY: THE Case of UYGHUR VIllaGers IN EasterN XINJIANG, CHINA* CHRIS HANN** [email protected] Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle, Alemania A BST ra CT The article is based on the author’s conviction that ethnographic analysis can illuminate big issues of world history. In the framework of substantivist economic anthropology, concepts of (un) certainty and social security are applied to Chinese socialism, which has outlived its Soviet prototype. Socialism is theorized in an evolutionist perspective as the transcendence of uncertainty in modern conditions. The case study of peasants in eastern Xinjiang highlights the problems of the Uyghur minority, who are attracted to the city but lack the networks and language skills to facilitate migration, and experience 79 discrimination in urban labor markets. China’s embedded socialism is currently successful in balancing forms of integration in such a way as to reduce existential uncertainty to a minimum for the dominant Han population, both inside and beyond the village.
    [Show full text]