DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Anthropology History, Ethnography, Critique

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Anthropology History, Ethnography, Critique Economic Anthropology History, Ethnography, Critique Chris Hann and Keith Hart polity Economic Anthropology also historians and sociologists (and many varieties under each of those labels) - must join forces. Some economists 1 claim a special status for their discipline and locate it closer to the 'hard' sciences than to 'soft' disciplines in the humanities. We take a critical and historical view of such claims, but it is Introduction: Economic not our intention to offer a romantic, utopian alternative to Anthropology economics. We are aware that economics is in some ways as diverse as anthropology. Our aim is to bring the two closer together and this makes us critical of mainstream positions on both sides. Previous accounts of economic anthropology linked it to the founding fathers of modern social theory - notably Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Occasionally the history was Anthropologists aim to discover the principles of · social traced back to the political economists of the Enlightenment. organization at every level from the most particular to the We argue that the core questions are much older than this. universal. The purpose of economic anthropology in the nine­ Ultimately, economic anthropology addresses questions of teenth century, even before it took shape as 'the economics of human nature and well-being, questions that have preoc­ primitive man', was to test the claim that a world economic cupied every society's philosophers from the beginning. We order must be founded on the principles that underpinned make a case for an economic anthropology that is able to a Western industrial society striving for universality. The investigate this 'human economy' anywhere in time and search was on for alternatives that might support a more just space, as a creation of all humanity. But there have been economy, whether liberal, socialist, anarchist or communist. tremendous changes in the world economy over the last Hence the interest in origins and evolution, since society half-century, especially since the end of the Cold War, and was understood to be in movement and had not yet reached we therefore give the highest priority to addressing these on­ its final form. Anthropology was the most inclusive way of going transformations. thinking about economic possibilities. For the sake of readability, we have tried to avoid clutter­ In the twentieth century, knowledge was compartmental­ ing the text with footnotes or excessive references, quotations ized to an unprecedented degree, providing space for the and citation marks. The Notes on Further Reading which emergence of social disciplines modelled on the natural sci­ precede the Bibliography are intended to provide interested ences. Anthropology found itself pigeon-holed as the study readers with further detail concerning the materials presented of those parts of humanity that the others could not reach. in each chapter, as well as supplementary suggestions. Incorporated into the expanding universities, the job of the We are grateful to Sophie Chevalier, Horacio Ortiz and anthropologists was to accumulate an objectified data bank Vishnu Padayachee for permission to use collaborative mate­ on 'other cultures', largely for consumption by insiders and rial. Thanks also go to Gareth Dale, Stephen Gudeman, Sandy a few other experts, rather than the general public. The pro­ Robertson and Don Robotham for their helpful comments. fession became fixed in a cultural relativist paradigm (every society should have its own culture), by definition opposed to the universally valid truths of economics. Anthropologists based their intellectual authority on extended sojourns in X 1 Economic Anthropology Introduction: Economic Anthropology remote areas, and their ability to address the world's economic the 1970s through three decades of neoliberal globalization. trajectory was much impaired as a result. We examine new critical perspectives, the 'cultural turn' in We identify three stages in the development of economic economic anthropology, and fresh aspirations to the mantle anthropology as a field. In the first, from the 1870s up to the of hard science, notably in the guise of 'New Institutional 1940s, most anthropologists were interested in whether Economics'. This period has seen anthropologists expand the economic behaviour of 'savages' was underpinned by their inquiries to address the full range of human economic the same notions of efficiency and 'rationality' that were organization, which they study from a variety of perspec­ taken to motivate economic action in the West. They initially tives. So far, they have preferred in the main to stick with devoted themselves to assembling compendious accounts of the tradition of ethnographic observation. We argue that the world history conceived of as an evolutionary process. Later, time is ripe for anthropologists to go further and address in the years following the First World War, the practice the world economy as a whole. In this new, fourth phase, of fieldwork became ever more dominant, and ethnogra­ economic anthropology would finally emerge as a discipline phers sought to engage the more general propositions of in its own right. mainstream ('neoclassical') economics with their particular The most basic issue remains whether or not the forms of findings about 'primitive' societies. They failed, mainly market economy that have allowed North Atlantic societies to because they misunderstood the economists' epistemological dominate the world economy over the last two centuries rest I premises. on principles of universal validity. Arguments about same­ Ill In the 1950s and 1960s the Cold War was at its height, the ness and difference have plagued economic anthropology II I world economy was booming and governments everywhere throughout its history. We can be proud of anthropologists' I committed themselves to expanding public services while commitment to joining the people where they live in order to retaining tight controls over financial markets. Economic find out what they think and do. We now understand that anthropologists argued among themselves about the theories to analyse non-market economic action through the lens of and methods needed to study their special preserve, which market models is no more defensible intellectually than to was now extended to include the world's peasants alongside analyse the latest financial crash on Wall Street in terms of its dwindling number of tribesmen. 'Formalists' held that the the worldview of a small community of hunter-gatherers. concepts and tools of mainstream economics were adequate Contrasts of this kind have their uses, but they must be to this task, while 'substantivists' claimed that institutional employed with caution. There is no reason to suppose that approaches were more appropriate. By 'institutional' they the diversity of human economies throughout history can be meant that economic life in societies that were not dominated r~duced to a single great divide between the West and the rest. by impersonal markets was always 'embedded' in other social In any case, anthropologists need to make fieldwork-based institutions, ranging from the household to government and ethnography more open to a perspective on world history that religion. most of them abandoned in the twentieth century. In retrospect, this formalist-substantivist debate was a golden age for economic anthropology. It ended in a stale­ mate, thereby opening the way for Marxists and feminists Some Issues of Method to exercise a brief dominance, but they too mainly drew on the traditional subject matter of exotic ethnography. The 1'-ny concept put forward as presumptively universal has third stage of our history takes us from the watershed of lts own particular history. The word 'economy' originates 2 3 Economic Anthropology Introduction: Economic Anthropology in the Ancient Greek oikonomia, where it referred to the chapter we provide a historical outline of its changing ref­ management of a household, usually a manorial estate. A erents from ancient times to now. Economy is one of the complex division of labour based on markets and money keywords of modern civilization. Knowledge of its histori­ can be traced back much further, notably to Mesopotamia cal trajectory should make us more aware when deploying in the third millennium BCE; but, as we explain in the next it universally. chapter, oikonomia was conceived of as the antithesis of the A more serious limitation follows from our decision to place market principle. Of course human beings have reproduced economic anthropology in the context of Western intellectual themselves in their environments and exchanged goods with history and this in turn within a particular view of world other groups since the origins of our species, so in this sense history. Our account is heavily skewed towards a North we can say that the human economy is as old as human­ Atlantic perspective, reflecting European and American domi­ ity itself. Since modern ethnography can shed only very nance of world society and its academic representation in limited light on this history, we must look instead to other the modern period. Economic anthropologists have worked disciplines, especially to economic archaeology. Although around the globe for over a century, but a self-conscious intel­ archaeological studies of material traces- including the fossil lectual community took shape initially in European countries record - yield rich clues to ancient modes of subsistence with colonial empires, before its eventual consolidation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maurice Godelier and the Study of Ideology
    MAURICE GODELIER AND THE STUDY OF' IDEOLOGY In recent years we have seen a gradual coming together of two trends in social anthropology which were earlier often thought of as opposite poles, namely the structuralist and the marxist.marxist 0 1'hisThis development has been most marked within French anthropology. Where\vhere Levi-Strauss in 1962 was conte~tconte:p.t to leave to other disciplines the study of inffastructures proper (1966: 131) he now admits a determining role (though not the spie determining role) to the relationship between man and his techno-economic environment (1974). And, where marxist·anthropologistamarxist anthropologists never thought of questioning the axiom that it is the economic infrastructure which 'in the last analysis' determines the form and evolution of social formations, and frustrated the rest of us by always beginning with that 'last analysis' and never getting around to any of the previous ones, today ideology appeq,rsappe~rs among the mostmost.frequent frequent topics for marxist analysis. Among those, explicitly concerned with the combination of structuralist and marxist approaches is. MauriceMa.urice Godelier.InGodelier •.. In this paper I wish to take up some points relating to Godelier's work on religion, ideology and the like. Religion We·We may well take as a point of departure a brief paper by Godelier entitled 'Toward a Marxist Anthropology of Religion', in which he gives 'an example of how Marxist anthropologists can .. proceed to analyze religion in the pre-capitalist societies which are their
    [Show full text]
  • The Agrarian Question in Tanzania?
    The Agrarian Question In Tanzania? CurrenT AfrICAn Issues 45 THe AGrArIAn QUESTIOn In TAnZAnIA? A state of the Art Paper sam Maghimbi razack B. Lokina Mathew A. senga nOrDIsKA AfrIKAInsTITuTeT, uPPsALA In coperation with THe unIVersITY Of DAr ES sALAAM 2 011 1 sam Maghimbi, razack B. Lokina, Mathew A. senga The Mwalimu Nyerere Professorial Chair in Pan-African Studies was established as a university chair at the University of Dar es Salaam in honour of the great nationalist and pan-Africanist leader of Africa and the first president of Tanzania, Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere. It was inaugurated on April 19, 2008 by the Prime Minister Honourable Mizengo Pinda in the presence of Mama Maria Nyerere. The main objective of the Chair is to reinvigorate intellectual debates on the Campus and stimulate basic research on burning issues facing the country and the continent from a pan-African perspective. The core activities of the Chair include publication of state of the art papers. As part of the latter, the Chair is pleased to publish the first paper The Agrarian Question in Tanzania. It is planned to publish at least one state of the art paper every year. first published by Mwalimu Nyerere Professorial Chair in Pan-African Studies University of Dar es Salaam P. O. Box 35091 Dar es Salaam Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.nyererechair.udsm.ac.tz INDExING TErMS: Agrarian policy Agrarian structure Peasantry Agricultural population Land tenure State Agrarian reform Land reform rural development Economic and social development Tanzania The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
    [Show full text]
  • Gifts and Commodities (Second Edition)
    GIFTS AND COMMODITIES Hau BOOKS Executive Editor Giovanni da Col Managing Editor Sean M. Dowdy Editorial Board Anne-Christine Taylor Carlos Fausto Danilyn Rutherford Ilana Gershon Jason Throop Joel Robbins Jonathan Parry Michael Lempert Stephan Palmié www.haubooks.com GIFTS AND COMMODITIES (SECOND EditIon) C. A. Gregory Foreword by Marilyn Strathern New Preface by the Author Hau Books Chicago © 2015 by C. A. Gregory and Hau Books. First Edition © 1982 Academic Press, London. All rights reserved. Cover and layout design: Sheehan Moore Typesetting: Prepress Plus (www.prepressplus.in) ISBN: 978-0-9905050-1-3 LCCN: 2014953483 Hau Books Chicago Distribution Center 11030 S. Langley Chicago, IL 60628 www.haubooks.com Hau Books is marketed and distributed by The University of Chicago Press. www.press.uchicago.edu Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. For Judy, Polly, and Melanie. Contents Foreword by Marilyn Strathern xi Preface to the first edition xv Preface to the second edition xix Acknowledgments liii Introduction lv PART ONE: CONCEPTS I. THE COmpETING THEOriES 3 Political economy 3 The theory of commodities 3 The theory of gifts 9 Economics 19 The theory of modern goods 19 The theory of traditional goods 22 II. A framEWORK OF ANALYSIS 25 The general relation of production to consumption, distribution, and exchange 26 Marx and Lévi-Strauss on reproduction 26 A simple illustrative example 30 The definition of particular economies 32 viii GIFTS AND COMMODITIES III.FTS GI AND COMMODITIES: CIRCULATION 39 The direct exchange of things 40 The social status of transactors 40 The social status of objects 41 The spatial aspect of exchange 44 The temporal dimension of exchange 46 Value and rank 46 The motivation of transactors 50 The circulation of things 55 Velocity of circulation 55 Roads of gift-debt 57 Production and destruction 59 The circulation of people 62 Work-commodities 62 Work-gifts 62 Women-gifts 63 Classificatory kinship terms and prices 68 Circulation and distribution 69 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • And Colin Bundy's “African Peasantry”
    International Journal of Development and Sustainability ISSN: 2186-8662 – www.isdsnet.com/ijds Volume 3 Number 7 (2014): Pages 1410-1437 ISDS Article ID: IJDS14042304 Chayanov’s “development theory” and Colin Bundy’s “African peasantry”: Relevance to contemporary development and agricultural discourse Anis Mahomed Karodia* Regent Business School, Durban, South Africa Abstract of Part One This paper attempts to look at the work of Chayanov, in respect of contemporary development issues and reexamines his work (on the basis of the work of TeodorShanin and partly by HamzaAlavi). Chayanov was considered during his time as the new Marx. His discourse and thoughts were fashioned upon the political economy and based on intellectual criticism of the USSR. He was sidelined by the then USSR and put to pasture by the many forms of repression in the then Soviet Union. His work bears utmost relevance to contemporary dialogue in respect of agriculture and development issues, in the context of the modern world. On the other hand the second part of the paper will look at Colin Bundy’s book the Rise and Fall of the African Peasantry. It is probably the most influential account of rural history produced in the 1970’s, and is hailed as a major reinterpretation of South African history, in terms of African agriculture which was considered as inherently primitive or backward and capitalism was hostile to peasants. Both parts of the paper look at the preface of the books written by TeodorShanin and By Colin Bundy himself, in order to look at very important and vexing issues that permeate 21st century discourse on development and agriculture Keywords:Development; Agriculture; Peasantry; Reinterpretation; Political Economy; Contemporary Dialogue; Capitalism; Poverty; Legacy; Traditionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Cash on the Table 1
    Cash on the Table 1 Introduction Markets and Moralities Edward F. Fischer Moral values inform economic behavior.1 On its face, this is an unas- sailable proposition. Think of the often spiritual appeal of consumer goods or the value-laden stakes of upward or downward mobility. Think about the central role that moral questions regarding poverty, access to health care, the tax code, property and land rights, and corruption play in the shap- ing of modern governments, societies, and social movements. Think of fair trade coffee and organic produce and the thrift expressed in Walmart’s everyday low prices. The moral aspects of the marketplace have never been so contentious or consequential. Despite this relationship, the realm of economics is often treated as a world unto itself, a domain where human behavior is guided not by emo- tions, beliefs, moralities, or the passions that fascinate anthropologists but by the hard calculus of rational choices. The attraction of this Homo eco- nomicus paradigm rests in its parsimony, in the way it translates the chaos of everyday life and human behavior into a metric system complete with mathematical models based on assumptions about self-interest and maxi- mization (see Beckert 2002; Carrier 1997; Fullbrook 2004; Stiglitz 1993). Authors of economics textbooks often liken the workings of markets to nat- ural forces, distancing themselves from the field’s historical roots in phi- losophy and ethics. On issues of value and morality, many economists plead COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL www.sarpress.org 3 Edward F. Fischer agnosticism—it is not a question of good or bad, they say, but rather of effi- cient or inefficient (see Becker 1996; Becker and Becker 1996; Samuelson 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Download (202184 Bytes)
    EASA Biennial Conference Experiencing Diversity and Mutuality Ljubljana, Slovenia 26-30 August 2008 Ships passing in the night? Interdisciplinarity, East-West relations and commoditization of knowledge in anthropology of post-socialism Kacper Pobłocki Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Abstract: Debates on 'native anthropology', 'anthropology with an accent' and so forth have usually focused on colonialism as the main culprit of asymmetric relations between anthropological knowledges. By bringing the recent dispute between Western and 'native' anthropologist of post-socialism into the 'world anthropologies' debate, I seek to highlight those aspects of current epistemic inequalities that are not post-colonial in nature, but result from global commoditization of knowledge. I ponder why Western anthropologists who started visiting Eastern Europe from the 1970s, concluded that 'native' academic knowledge is inferior to their own output. This was not due to a prejudice brought from afar, I argue, but rather was a result of their field experiences. I discuss how three types of native 'captive minds' (communist, nationalist, and neo-liberal) emerged, and how encountering (or learning about) them made Western anthropologist uninterested in (and distrustful of) local epistemic production. I focus on the putative nationalist 'captive mind', and argue that the straw man of East European 'positivist' science (as opposed to the superior 'theory-oriented' Western anthropology) emerged due to recent changes in the political economy of the academia. I show how the 'theoretical turn' was experienced differently in Western and Polish academia, and how these changes, explained by the different regimes of value, show that there has been an increase only in 'ritual' exchange between parochial and metropolitan anthropology rather than meaningful communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Laurent Dousset and Serge Tcherkézoff
    IntroductIon Laurent Dousset and Serge Tcherkézoff ‘From initiation rituals in Papua new Guinea to the twin towers’: this is how Maurice Godelier (2008b) summarizes the anthropological project and its remit, the scope of anthropology. Hegel’s declaration that ‘nothing that is human is foreign to me’ is both apt and applied in practice, simultaneously tracing the purpose of a scientific programme and the curves of a personal trajectory. More than a simple assertion that the human being is a social animal, Maurice Godelier’s work is guided by the precept that the human being has to actively produce society in order to live. It is a condition of existence. the intellectual path of a man who has taught several generations of anthropologists evinces both the broad ambitions of anthropology as a science of universal significance and a view of social reality as a tangible and, in principle, an intelligible set of facts. the practice of the social sciences reveals a constant dialectic between ethnography and theory, the particular and the general, the local and the global, the diversity of facts and their unification in anthropological analysis.t he relentless intellectual movement between the acknowledgement of the particularistic nature of the local and the general scientific project it advances is a constant feature of Maurice Godelier’s corpus. Such a project is feasible only if knowledge is progressively accumulated, if the theoretical apparatus is part of a developing paradigmatic choice, if schools of thought and their epistemological frameworks are non-dogmatic. Students of Maurice Godelier have heard him say, on many occasions, that one needs to be capable of using the ideas and concepts that generate understanding, irrespective of any loyalty towards a particular intellectual guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Sahlins's Stone Age Economics, a Semicentenary
    H-Announce Marshall Sahlins’s Stone Age Economics, a Semicentenary Estimate Announcement published by Federica Morelli on Thursday, June 6, 2019 Type: Call for Papers Date: November 30, 2019 Location: Italy Subject Fields: Anthropology, Economic History / Studies, Intellectual History, Social Sciences In 1972, American anthropologist Marshall Sahlins published Stone Age Economics. Now a classic of modern anthropology, and probably the most important work in economic anthropology, the book had a profound and critical impact on many different social sciences. From the identification and original use of the category of the mode of production to the idea of primitive affluence; from a vision of exchanges as defined also, and decisively, by their social terms to an illuminating interpretation of Mauss’s The Gift as the discover of the non-contractual element of the social contract; from the development of a cultural perspective on the economy and the alternative it provided to the economicism of formalist anthropology, with the proposal of an “anthropological economics”; the surprising modernity of Stone Age Economics provides social scientists with extremely fertile and inspiring ideas and approaches, whose continuing relevance is beyond dispute. On the occasion of the 50th anniversary, theAnnals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science (http://www.annalsfondazioneluigieinaudi.it/en) will host a monographic issue on Marshall Sahlins’s Stone Age Economics (“A Semicentenary Estimate”), to be published in 2021. The mission of the Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi (which builds upon the tradition of cultural openness fostered by the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi di Torino, established in 1964 by the scholar of political theory at Cornell University Mario Einaudi, with the support of the family of economist and former President of the Italian Republic Luigi Einaudi) is to contribute to promote interdisciplinarity as a method of scientific inquiry and a highly relevant issue in social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Ontology of Design
    Notes on the Ontology of Design Arturo Escobar University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Contents 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………. ……….. 2 2. Part I. Design for the Real World: But which world? what design? what real? ………………………….. …. 4 3. Part II. In the background of our culture: The rationalistic tradition and the problem of ontological dualism……… 16 4. Part III. Outline of ontological and autonomous design ……………….. 34 5. Part IV. The politics of relationality. Designs for the pluriverse ………. 57 6. Some provisional concluding remarks ………………………………….. 74 7. References ………………………………………………………………….. 78 Note to readers: This ‘paper’ ended up being actually the draft of a short book; the book is likely to have one more chapter, dealing with globalization, development, and environment issues; it is also likely to have examples, and to be written in a less academic manner, or so I hope. I’ve had several tentative titles over the past few years, the most recent one being The Ecological Crisis and the Question of Civilizational Transitions: Designs for the Pluriverse. I’ve been reading, and working with, most of this material for a long time, but some of it is new (to me); this is particularly true for Part I on design. I suspect the text is quite uneven as a result. Part IV is largely cut-and-paste from several texts in English and Spanish, particularly the long preface to the 2nd ed. of Encountering Development. This part will need additional re/writing besides editing and reorganizing. The references are somewhat incomplete; there are a few key design references of which I have been made aware very recently that are not, or not significantly, included (e.g., on participatory design, postcolonial computing, and human-computer interaction).
    [Show full text]
  • ENLIGHTENMENT? Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century
    Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 1999. 28:i–xxiii Copyright © 1999 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved WHAT IS ANTHROPOLOGICAL ENLIGHTENMENT? Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century Marshall Sahlins Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words: modernity, indigenization, translocality, culture, development n Abstract A broad reflection on some of the major surprises to anthropo- logical theory occasioned by the history, and in a number of instances the tenac- ity, of indigenous cultures in the twentieth century. We are not leaving the cen- tury with the same ideas that got us there. Contrary to the inherited notions of progressive development, whether of the political left or right, the surviving victims of imperial capitalism neither became all alike nor just like us. Contrary to the “despondency theory” of mid-century, the logical and historical precursor of dependency theory, surviving indigenous peoples aim to take cultural re- sponsibility for what has been done to them. Across large parts of northern North America, even hunters and gatherers live, largely by hunting and gather- ing. The Eskimo are still there, and they are still Eskimo. Around the world the peoples give the lie to received theoretical oppositions between tradition and change, indigenous culture and modernity, townsmen and tribesmen, and other clichés of the received anthropological wisdom. Reports of the death of indige- nous cultures—as of the demise of anthropology—have been exaggerated. CONTENTS Introduction .................................................... ii What Is Not Too Enlightening ..................................... ii Up the Indigenous Culture ........................................ vi The Indigenization of Modernity ................................... ix Tradition and Change ............................................ xi Functional Determination by the Basis .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Futures of Our Music Jean-Michel Beaudet
    Futures of Our Music Jean-Michel Beaudet To cite this version: Jean-Michel Beaudet. Futures of Our Music. Musik-Kontexte: Festschrift für Hanns-Werner Heister Band, Monsenstein et Vannerdat, 2011, 978-3869913209. hal-02001639 HAL Id: hal-02001639 https://hal.parisnanterre.fr//hal-02001639 Submitted on 31 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 85 Futures of Our Music Jean-Michel Beaudet Mis antiguos Estoy presente aquí Pero yo quiero ayuda ¿Qué voy a hacer? Seguir camino Ahora vamos a bailar (Weenhayek, 1995)1 inga momulu’a inga momulu’a the inga tree makes pregnant the inga tree makes pregnant (Wayãpi, 1977)2 Why speak about prospective? Do we need to think about the future of „our music“? What could a prospective program in ethnomusicology bring?3 First, it is a way to reaffirm, against many, that Chacobo or Wayãpi music from Amazonia, that Kanak or Papua New Guinea music from Oceania, or Temiar music from Malaysia are still alive, will stay alive and be strong actors of tomorrow’s cultural exchanges. To speak about the future of Amazonian music is, in a way, something new.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Political Ecology of Globality and Diference
    Gestión y Ambiente ISSN: 0124-177X [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Colombia Escobar, Arturo Political Ecology of Globality and Diference Gestión y Ambiente, vol. 9, núm. 3, diciembre, 2006, pp. 29-44 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Medellín, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169421027009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Reflexión Political Ecology of Globality and Diference Recibido para evaluación: 27 de Octubre de 2006 Arturo Escobar 1 Aceptación: 13 de Diciembre de 2006 Recibido versión final: 20 de Diciembre de 2006 Artículo de reflexión, introducción al libro “Regions and Places in the Age of Globality: Social Movements and Biodiversity Conservation in the Colombian Pacific”, próximo a ser publicado, y resultado de un proceso de investigación sobre geopolítica del conocimiento. RESUMEN Este artículo es la introducción a un libro que está en imprenta. El versa sobre la dinámica de la globalidad imperial y su régimen global de colonialidad como una de las carracterísticas más sobresalientes del sistema mundo colonial moderno a comienzos del siglo XXI. También es, en un sentido literal, geopolítica del conocimiento. Presta de Joan Martínez Allier su definición de “ecología política” como el estudio de los conflictos ecológico­distributivos. Argumenta que una globalidad eurocéntrica tiene una contraparte obligatoria en el acto sistemático de “encubrimiento del otro”. Un tipo de “colonialidad global”.Usa seis conceptos clave para comprender el argumento: lugar, capital, naturaleza, desarrollo, e identidad.
    [Show full text]