Electrophysiological Receptor Mapping of GABAA Receptors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electrophysiological Receptor Mapping of GABAA Receptors bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.087726; this version posted May 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Electrophysiological receptor mapping of GABAA receptors Alexander D Shaw1, Hannah Chandler1, Khalid Hamandi1, Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy2, Alexander Hammers3, Krish D Singh1. 1Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, CF24 4HQ 2School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 3 School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH Corresponding Author: Dr Alexander D Shaw1, [email protected] Word counts: Abstract: 342 Introduction: 819 Methods: 1257 Results: 1000 Discussion: 968 Figures: 9 Tables: 0 Supplementary Materials: Yes Declarations: none. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.087726; this version posted May 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract The non-invasive study of cortical oscillations provides a window onto neuronal processing. Temporal correlation of these oscillations between distinct anatomical regions is considered a marker of functional connectedness. As the most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is thought to play a crucial role in shaping the frequency and amplitude of oscillations, which thereby suggests a further role for GABA in shaping the topography of functional connectivity. This study explored the effects of pharmacologically blocking the reuptake of GABA (increasing local concentrations and availability) through oral administration of the GAT1-blocker tiagabine (15 mg). We show that the spatial distribution of connectivity effects corresponds to template maps of flumazenil PET maps of GABAA receptor distribution. In a placebo-controlled crossover design, we collected resting MEG recordings from 15 healthy male individuals prior to, and at 1-, 3- and 5- hours post, administration of tiagabine and placebo pill. Using amplitude envelope correlations (AECs) we quantified the functional connectivity in discrete frequency bands across the whole brain, using the 90-region Automatic Anatomical Labelling atlas (AAL90), as well as quantifying the average oscillatory activity at each region. Analysis of variance in connectivity using a drug-by-time (2x4) design revealed interaction effects, accompanied by main effects of drug and time. Post-hoc permutation testing of each post-drug recording against the respective pre-drug baseline revealed consistent reductions of a bilateral occipital network spanning theta, alpha and beta frequencies, and across 1- 3- and 5- hour recordings following tiagabine, but not placebo. The same analysis applied to the activity of each region also revealed a significant interaction, with post-hoc permutation testing signalling significant reductions in activity in middle occipital regions across delta, theta, alpha and beta frequency bands. Crucially, we show that the spatial distribution of both connectivity and activity changes with tiagabine overlaps significantly with template quantitative GABAA maps derived from flumazenil volume-of- distribution (FMZ-VT) PET, clearly demonstrating a mechanistic link between GABA availability, GABAA receptor distribution and low-frequency network oscillations. We therefore propose a utility for functional connectivity and activity measures as receptor-mapping tools in pharmacological imaging. Introduction Oscillations measured using non-invasive methods, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), arise from the synchronous oscillatory-activation of post-synaptic currents in ensembles of principal cells in cortex (Brunel & Wang, 2003; Buzsáki et al., 2004; Wang, 2010), predominantly those in superficial layers (Buzsáki et al., 2012; Xing et al., 2012). Converging evidence from experimental (Kramer et al., bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.087726; this version posted May 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2008; M. a Whittington et al., 1995) and computational (Brunel & Wang, 2003; Pinotsis et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2017) studies suggests that the attributes of these oscillations – the peak frequency and amplitude – are determined by more fundamental, unobserved, neurophysiological processes. For example, the peak frequency of oscillations within the alpha range (8 – 13 Hz) may be a mechanistic consequence of synchronised firing (action potentials) at the same rate (Halgren et al., 2017; Lorincz et al., 2009), while the peak frequency of oscillations across many frequency bands has been linked with inhibitory neurotransmission (Buzsáki et al., 2004; Hall et al., 2011; Roopun et al., 2006; M. A. Whittington et al., 2000) mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The link between GABA and macroscopic oscillations observed in MEG is likely mediated by the functional inhibitory role of GABA receptors, which are broadly categorised as fast, ionotropic GABAA and slower g-protein coupled GABAB, although there exist subtypes of each (Belelli et al., 2009; Vargas, 2018; Whiting, 2003). The currents mediated by both of these receptor types have been implicated in oscillation generation through control of recurrent excitatory-inhibition (Atallah & Scanziani, 2009; Brunel & Wang, 2003; Galarreta & Hestrin, 1998; Kohl & Paulsen, 2010; Krupa et al., 2014), whereby the GABAergically-mediated inhibitory currents exert temporal control over the firing and activity of excitatory principal cells (Bartos et al., 2007; M. A. Whittington et al., 2000). In the case of higher-frequency oscillations, including beta (13 - 30 Hz) and gamma (30+ Hz), the peak frequency may be dependent on the balance of excitatory and inhibitory currents (Brunel & Wang, 2003; Kujala et al., 2015; Shaw et al., 2017), implicating excitatory glutamatergic receptor types, such as α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA). Pharmaco-MEG studies provide a framework for examining the effects that pharmacologically manipulating neurotransmitter or neuromodulator systems has on oscillatory activity. Studies of GABAergic drugs to date have primarily examined changes in task-induced fluctuations in oscillation metrics, usually confined to the analysis of one particular sensory system. For example in the motor cortex, diazepam, a benzodiazepine, facilitates the amplitude of movement-related beta desynchrony (MRBD) (Hall et al., 2011). In visual cortex, propofol, an agonist of GABAA receptors, increased the amplitude of gamma oscillations and concurrently suppressed the amplitude of alpha oscillations (Saxena et al., 2013). Alcohol, which has a complex binding profile including benzodiazepine- mediated GABAA effects, decreased the frequency and increased the amplitude of gamma in the visual cortex (Campbell et al., 2014). For other GABAergic pharmaco-MEG summaries, see ((Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy, 2014; Nutt et al., 2015)) These studies clearly demonstrate a role for GABA in shaping oscillatory responses, however they are confined to observations of task-related, local dynamics. Non-task induced recordings of oscillatory activity, at ‘resting state’, focus on correlation of fluctuations in different brain regions, within specific frequency bands. This ‘functional connectivity’ approach rests on the assumption that discrete regions of the brain whose band-limited amplitude bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.087726; this version posted May 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. envelopes are correlated, are functionally connected. Since GABA plays a role in shaping the oscillations of local (within-region), task-induced dynamics, it is expected that it also shapes the topography of the networks formed by these regions interacting. No pharmaco-MEG studies have examined GABAergic manipulation of functional connectivity across the brain, although studies examining other compounds have. Antagonism of NMDA receptors by ketamine decreased alpha and beta networks spanning motor, parietal and occipital regions (S. D. Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2015), while antagonism of AMPA receptors by perampanel increased alpha and beta in similar posterior visual and parietal regions (Routley et al., 2017). Comparison of the spatial distribution of these reductions with recent maps of receptor distributions (Zilles & Palomero-Gallagher, 2017) revealed that these areas also have higher-than-average densities of NMDA and AMPA receptors in superficial cortical layers, as well as higher-than-average densities of GABAA and GABAB receptors (where the average is calculated over the 44 cortex-wide regions tested) (Zilles
Recommended publications
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Synapse
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Synapse. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 4. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Synapse. 2006 November ; 60(6): 411±419. doi:10.1002/syn.20314. GABAA Receptor Regulation of Voluntary Ethanol Drinking Requires PKCε Joyce Besheer, Veronique Lepoutre, Beth Mole, and Clyde W. Hodge* Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Abstract Protein kinase C (PKC) regulates a variety of neural functions, including ion channel activity, neurotransmitter release, receptor desensitization and differentiation. We have shown previously that mice lacking the ε-isoform of PKC (PKCε) self-administer 75% less ethanol and exhibit supersensitivity to acute ethanol and allosteric positive modulators of GABAA receptors when compared with wild-type controls. The purpose of the present study was to examine involvement of PKCε in GABAA receptor regulation of voluntary ethanol drinking. To address this question, PKCε null-mutant and wild-type control mice were allowed to drink ethanol (10% v/v) vs. water on a two-bottle continuous access protocol. The effects of diazepam (nonselective GABAA BZ positive modulator), zolpidem (GABAA α1 agonist), L-655,708 (BZ-sensitive GABAA α5 inverse agonist), and flumazenil (BZ antagonist) were then tested on ethanol drinking. Ethanol intake (grams/kg/day) by wild-type mice decreased significantly after diazepam or zolpidem but increased after L-655,708 administration. Flumazenil antagonized diazepam-induced reductions in ethanol drinking in wild- type mice. However, ethanol intake by PKCε null mice was not altered by any of the GABAergic compounds even though effects were seen on water drinking in these mice.
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Receptors
    D Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews Review No.7 / 1-2011 GABA receptors Wolfgang Froestl , CNS & Chemistry Expert, AC Immune SA, PSE Building B - EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Phone: +41 21 693 91 43, FAX: +41 21 693 91 20, E-mail: [email protected] GABA Activation of the GABA A receptor leads to an influx of chloride GABA ( -aminobutyric acid; Figure 1) is the most important and ions and to a hyperpolarization of the membrane. 16 subunits with γ most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian molecular weights between 50 and 65 kD have been identified brain 1,2 , where it was first discovered in 1950 3-5 . It is a small achiral so far, 6 subunits, 3 subunits, 3 subunits, and the , , α β γ δ ε θ molecule with molecular weight of 103 g/mol and high water solu - and subunits 8,9 . π bility. At 25°C one gram of water can dissolve 1.3 grams of GABA. 2 Such a hydrophilic molecule (log P = -2.13, PSA = 63.3 Å ) cannot In the meantime all GABA A receptor binding sites have been eluci - cross the blood brain barrier. It is produced in the brain by decarb- dated in great detail. The GABA site is located at the interface oxylation of L-glutamic acid by the enzyme glutamic acid decarb- between and subunits. Benzodiazepines interact with subunit α β oxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15). It is a neutral amino acid with pK = combinations ( ) ( ) , which is the most abundant combi - 1 α1 2 β2 2 γ2 4.23 and pK = 10.43.
    [Show full text]
  • Benzodiazepine Actions Mediated by Specificg-Aminobutyric Acida
    letters to nature ..................................................................................................................................... erratum Benzodiazepine actions mediated by speci®c g-aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes Uwe Rudolph, Florence Crestani, Dietmar Benke, Ina BruÈnig, Jack A. Benson, Jean-Marc Fritschy, James R. Martin, Horst Bluethmann & Hanns MoÈhler Nature 401, 796±800 (1999) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The quality of Fig. 2 was unsatisfactory as published. The ®gure is reproduced again here. M 3 3 a d [ H]Ro15-4513 [ H]Ro15-4513, Ki (nM) + diazepam 1(H101R) 1(H101R) α α Wild-type Wild-type α1 α5 Wild-type α2 β2/3 α3 γ2 1(H101R) α α b Wild-type 1(H101R) e Wild-type 3 µM GABA+Dz +Ro15 3 µM GABA α1 α1(H101R) 3 µ µ c Displacement of [ H]Ro15-4513, Ki (nM) 3 M GABA+Dz +Ro15 3 M GABA Wild-type α1(H101R) Clonazepam 3 ± 2 > 10,000 Diazepam 28 ± 15 > 10,000 Zolpidem 13 ± 5 > 10,000 500 pA 2 s ................................................................. suggest that pairing occurs primarily on the electrons on the g- correction sheet of the Fermi surface under the conditions of the experiment. However, the orientation of the FLL, interpreted within Agterberg's two-component Ginzburg±Landau (TCGL) theory1,2, is no longer consistent with g-band pairing if we take the values of Fermi surface Observation of a square ¯ux-line anisotropy used in refs 1, 2, and obtained by recent band structure calculations3. However, other calculations (T. Oguchi, private lattice in the unconventional communication) give a different sign of Fermi surface anisotropy. TCGL theory predictions may be modi®ed by extra anisotropy of superconductor Sr2RuO4 the superconducting energy gap3, by substantial pairing on the a- and/or b-sheets4 or by anisotropy in the electron mass enhance- T.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Properties of GABAA- Receptors Containing Gamma1
    Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on November 4, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.017236 Molecular PharmacologyThis article hasFast not Forward.been copyedited Published and formatted. on The November final version 7, may 2005 differ as from doi:10.1124/mol.105.017236 this version. MOLPHARM/2005/017236 Pharmacological properties of GABAA- receptors containing gamma1- subunits Khom S.1, Baburin I.1, Timin EN, Hohaus A., Sieghart W., Hering S. Downloaded from Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna Center of Brain Research , Medical University of Vienna, Division of Biochemistry and molpharm.aspetjournals.org Molecular Biology at ASPET Journals on September 27, 2021 1 Copyright 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on November 4, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.017236 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. MOLPHARM/2005/017236 Running Title: GABAA- receptors containing gamma1- subunits Corresponding author: Steffen Hering Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Vienna Althanstrasse 14 Downloaded from A-1090 Vienna Telephone number: +43-1-4277-55301 Fax number: +43-1-4277-9553 molpharm.aspetjournals.org [email protected] Text pages: 29 at ASPET Journals on September 27, 2021 Tables: 2 Figures: 7 References: 26 Abstract: 236 words Introduction:575 words Discussion:1383 words 2 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on November 4, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.017236 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. MOLPHARM/2005/017236 Abstract GABAA receptors composed of α1, β2, γ1-subunits are expressed in only a few areas of the brain and thus represent interesting drug targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Midazolam, Ketamine
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2010 Total invtravenous anesthesia with midazolam, ketamine, and xylazine or detomidine following induction with tiletamine, zolazepam, and xylazine in red deer (Cervus elaphus hippelaphus) undergoing surgery Auer, U ; Wenger, S ; Beigelböck, C ; Zenker, W ; Mosing, M Abstract: Sixteen captive female red deer were successfully anesthetized to surgically implant a telemetry system. The deer were immobilized with (mean±SD) 1.79±0.29 mg/kg xylazine and 1.79±0.29 mg/kg tiletamine/zolazepam given intramuscularly with a dart gun. Anesthesia was maintained for 69±2 min using a total intravenous protocol with a catheter placed in the jugular vein. Group X received xylazine (0.5±0.055 mg/kg/hr) and group D, detomidine (2±0.22 µg/kg/hr), both in combination with ketamine (2±0.02 mg/kg/hr) and midazolam (0.03±0.0033 mg/kg/hr), as a constant rate infusion. Anesthesia was reversed with 0.09±0.01 mg/kg atipamezole and 8.7±1.21 µg/kg sarmazenil given intravenously in both groups. These drug combinations provided smooth induction, stable anesthesia for surgery, and rapid recovery. Respiratory depression and mild hypoxemia were seen, and we, therefore, recommend using supplemental intranasal oxygen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-46.4.1196 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-36361 Journal Article Originally published at: Auer, U; Wenger, S; Beigelböck, C; Zenker, W; Mosing, M (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Is a CNS Depressant
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Important Administration Information for All Patients XYREM safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for • Take each dose while in bed and lie down after dosing (2.3). XYREM. • Allow 2 hours after eating before dosing (2.3). • Prepare both doses prior to bedtime; dilute each dose with approximately ¼ XYREM® (sodium oxybate) oral solution, CIII cup of water in pharmacy-provided containers (2.3). Initial U.S. Approval: 2002 • Patients with Hepatic Impairment: starting dose is one-half of the original dosage per night, administered orally divided into two doses (2.4). • WARNING: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) DEPRESSION Concomitant use with Divalproex Sodium: an initial reduction in Xyrem dose and ABUSE AND MISUSE. of at least 20% is recommended (2.5, 7.2). --------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS------------------- See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Oral solution, 0.5 g per mL (3) Central Nervous System Depression ----------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS------------------------------ • Xyrem is a CNS depressant, and respiratory depression can occur with • In combination with sedative hypnotics or alcohol (4) Xyrem use (5.1, 5.4) • Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (4) Abuse and Misuse • Xyrem is the sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). Abuse or misuse of illicit GHB is associated with CNS adverse reactions, ---------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS----------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol Potently and Competitively Inhibits Binding of the Alcohol Antagonist Ro15-4513 to ␣4/6␤3␦ GABAA Receptors H
    Ethanol potently and competitively inhibits binding of the alcohol antagonist Ro15-4513 to ␣4/6␤3␦ GABAA receptors H. Jacob Hanchar*†, Panida Chutsrinopkun†‡, Pratap Meera§, Porntip Supavilai‡, Werner Sieghart¶, Martin Wallner*ʈ, and Richard W. Olsen*ʈ Departments of *Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and §Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; ‡Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10 400, Thailand; and ¶Center for Brain Research, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Section of Biochemical Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria Edited by Floyd E. Bloom, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, and approved February 10, 2006 (received for review November 16, 2005) Although GABAA receptors have long been implicated in mediating (14) concluded that the EtOH-induced increase in tonic current ethanol (EtOH) actions, receptors containing the ‘‘nonsynaptic’’ ␦ is due to increased GABA release rather than a postsynaptic subunit only recently have been shown to be uniquely sensitive to effect. Also, for reasons on which we can only speculate, a recent EtOH. Here, we show that ␦ subunit-containing receptors bind the article by Borghese et al. (15) states that effects of low dose imidazo-benzodiazepines (BZs) flumazenil and Ro15-4513 with EtOH on ␦ subunit-containing receptors could not be observed, high affinity (Kd < 10 nM), contrary to the widely held belief that in particular with human ␣4␤3␦ GABAAR clones expressed in these receptors are insensitive to BZs. In immunopurified native oocytes and cell lines. cerebellar and recombinant ␦ subunit-containing receptors, bind- EtOH pharmacology shares many characteristics with alloste- 3 ing of the alcohol antagonist [ H]Ro15-4513 is inhibited by low ric activators of GABAARs (loosely referred to as GABAAR concentrations of EtOH (Ki Ϸ 8 mM).
    [Show full text]
  • Romazicon®) in an Animal Model
    Scientific Article Comparative pharmacokinetics of submucosal vs. intravenous flumazenil (Romazicon®) in an animal model Faith M. Oliver, DDS Trevor W. Sweatman, PhD John H. Unkel, DDS, MPA Michael A. Kahn, DDS Mildred M. Randolph, DVM Kristopher L. Arheart, EdD Timothy D. Mandrell, DVM Dr. Oliver is a resident, Pediatric Dentistry; Dr. Sweatman is an associate professor, Pharmacology; Dr. Unkel is an associate professor and postgraduate program director, Pediatric Dentistry; Dr. Kahn is a professor, Biologic & Diagnostic Sciences; Dr. Randolph is a veterinarian, Comparative Medicine; Dr. Arheart is an assistant professor, Preventive Medicine; and Dr. Mandrell is an associate professor, Comparative Medicine, they are all at the University of Tennessee. Correspond with Dr. Unkel at [email protected] Abstract Purpose: This study was performed to determine the in post-synaptic membrane hyperpolarization and reduced bioavailability and local tissue toxicological safety of flumazenil cortical stimulation via the lower brain centers. Traditional (Romazicon®) when administered by oral submucosal (SM) as endpoints for benzodiazepine-induced conscious sedation (pto- opposed to intravenous (IV) injection. sis, dysarthria, and drowsiness) are very close to an hypnotic Methods: Six dogs each received SM flumazenil (0.2 mg), and state in which the patient is unresponsive to verbal command.1,2 their serum was collected at predetermined time intervals (0-2 h) More recently, anxiolysis, amnesia, and patient cooperation and frozen (-70°C). Seven days later, the dogs received an iden- have been used as measures of drug effectiveness.3 With re- tical dose of IV flumazenil, and serum samples were again collected, gard to dentistry, the intranasal (IN: 0.2-0.4 mg/kg) or oral as above.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of the Contribution of the GABA-Benzodiazepine &Alpha
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 731–744 & 2012 ISCBFM All rights reserved 0271-678X/12 www.jcbfm.com Characterisation of the contribution of the GABA-benzodiazepine a1 receptor subtype to [11C]Ro15-4513 PET images James FM Myers1, Lula Rosso2, Ben J Watson1, Sue J Wilson1,3, Nicola J Kalk3, Nicoletta Clementi1, David J Brooks2, David J Nutt3, Federico E Turkheimer2 and Anne R Lingford-Hughes3 1Psychopharmacology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; 2Department of Medicine, Centre for Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, UK; 3Division of Experimental Medicine, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK This positron emission tomography (PET) study aimed to further define selectivity of [11C]Ro15-4513 binding to the GABARa5 relative to the GABARa1 benzodiazepine receptor subtype. The impact of zolpidem, a GABARa1-selective agonist, on [11C]Ro15-4513, which shows selectivity for GABARa5, and the nonselective benzodiazepine ligand [11C]flumazenil binding was assessed in humans. Compartmental modelling of the kinetics of [11C]Ro15-4513 time-activity curves was used to describe distribution volume (VT) differences in regions populated by different GABA receptor subtypes. Those with low a5 were best fitted by one-tissue compartment models; and those with high a5 required a more complex model. The heterogeneity between brain regions suggested spectral analysis as a more appropriate method to quantify binding as it does not a priori specify compartments. Spectral analysis revealed that zolpidem caused a significant VT decrease (B10%) in [11C]flumazenil, but no decrease in [11C]Ro15-4513 binding.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Pharmacology of Positive GABA-A Subtype-Selective Receptor Modulators for the Treatment of Anxiety
    www.nature.com/aps REVIEW ARTICLE Human pharmacology of positive GABA-A subtype-selective receptor modulators for the treatment of anxiety Xia Chen1,2,3,4, Joop van Gerven4,5, Adam Cohen4 and Gabriel Jacobs4 Anxiety disorders arise from disruptions among the highly interconnected circuits that normally serve to process the streams of potentially threatening stimuli. The resulting imbalance among these circuits can cause a fundamental misinterpretation of neural sensory information as threatening and can lead to the inappropriate emotional and behavioral responses observed in anxiety disorders. There is considerable preclinical evidence that the GABAergic system, in general, and its α2- and/or α5-subunit- containing GABA(A) receptor subtypes, in particular, are involved in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. However, the clinical efficacy of GABA-A α2-selective agonists for the treatment of anxiety disorders has not been unequivocally demonstrated. In this review, we present several human pharmacological studies that have been performed with the aim of identifying the pharmacologically active doses/exposure levels of several GABA-A subtype-selective novel compounds with potential anxiolytic effects. The pharmacological selectivity of novel α2-subtype-selective GABA(A) receptor partial agonists has been demonstrated by their distinct effect profiles on the neurophysiological and neuropsychological measurements that reflect the functions of multiple CNS domains compared with those of benzodiazepines, which are nonselective, full GABA(A) agonists. Normalizing the undesired pharmacodynamic side effects against the desired on-target effects on the saccadic peak velocity is a useful approach for presenting the pharmacological features of GABA(A)-ergic modulators. Moreover, combining the anxiogenic symptom provocation paradigm with validated neurophysiological and neuropsychological biomarkers may provide further construct validity for the clinical effects of novel anxiolytic agents.
    [Show full text]
  • DBL Flumazenil Data Sheet
    NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET 1. PRODUCT NAME DBL™ Flumazenil Injection 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Ampoules contain 0.1 mg/mL flumazenil in aqueous solution (for intravenous administration) and also the following ingredients: disodium edetate, acetic acid, sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide in water for injections adjusted to pH 4.0. DBL Flumazenil Injection is available as 0.5 mg/5 mL and 1 mg/10 mL ampoules. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM DBL Flumazenil Injection is a colourless to almost colourless clear liquid, adjusted to pH 4.0. Solution for injection. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications DBL Flumazenil Injection is indicated for use in hospitalised patients for the reversal of acute benzodiazepine effects (overdose or therapeutic). Hospitalised patients are patients admitted to hospital, inpatient care and under continued professional observation while under the influence of flumazenil. Not to be used in outpatients or short stay patients. Not to be used as a diagnostic. 4.2 Dose and method of administration DBL Flumazenil Injection should be administered intravenously by an anaesthetist or experienced physician. Dosage should be titrated for the intended effect. Since the duration of action of some benzodiazepines may exceed that of DBL Flumazenil Injection, repeated doses may be required if sedation recurs following awakening. The use of DBL Flumazenil Injection should be balanced against the risk of precipitating withdrawal symptoms (see section 4.4). The desirability of retaining a degree of sedation in the early postoperative period should be considered. DBL Flumazenil Injection may be diluted in glucose 5% in water or 0.9% NaCl for infusion and may also be used concurrently with other resuscitative procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirement Ofα5-GABAA Receptors for the Development of Tolerance To
    The Journal of Neuroscience, July 28, 2004 • 24(30):6785–6790 • 6785 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive ␣ Requirement of 5-GABAA Receptors for the Development of Tolerance to the Sedative Action of Diazepam in Mice Carolien van Rijnsoever,1* Marcus Ta¨uber,1* Mohamed Khaled Choulli,1 Ruth Keist,1 Uwe Rudolph,1 Hanns Mohler,1,2 Jean Marc Fritschy,1 and Florence Crestani1 1Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zu¨rich, 8057 Zu¨rich, Switzerland, and 2Department of Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8057 Zu¨rich, Switzerland Despite its pharmacological relevance, the mechanism of the development of tolerance to the action of benzodiazepines is essentially ␣ unknown. The acute sedative action of diazepam is mediated via 1-GABAA receptors. Therefore, we tested whether chronic activation of ␣ ␣ ␣ ␣ these receptors by diazepam is sufficient to induce tolerance to its sedative action. Knock-in mice, in which the 1-, 2-, 3-, or 5-GABAA receptors had been rendered insensitive to diazepam by histidine–arginine point mutation, were chronically treated with diazepam (8 d; ⅐ Ϫ1 ⅐ Ϫ1 ␣ ␣ 15 mg kg d ) and tested for motor activity. Wild-type, 2(H101R), and 3(H126R) mice showed a robust diminution of the ␣ ␣ motor-depressant drug action. In contrast, 5(H105R) mice failed to display any sedative tolerance. 1(H101R) mice showed no alter- ation of motor activity with chronic diazepam treatment. Autoradiography with [ 3H]flumazenil revealed no change in benzodiazepine ␣ binding sites. However, a decrease in 5-subunit radioligand binding was detected selectively in the dentate gyrus with specific ligands. This alteration was observed only in diazepam-tolerant animals, indicating that the manifestation of tolerance to the sedative action of ␣ ␣ diazepam is associated with a downregulation of 5-GABAA receptors in the dentate gyrus.
    [Show full text]