Natural Gas Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Gas Update Fredericton, N.B. September 28, 2006 Natural Gas Update Northeast Power Coordinating Council General Meeting Stephen Leahy Northeast Gas Association NGA Members Non-profit trade association Local gas utilities (LDCs) serving New England, New York, and New Jersey ME Several interstate pipeline companies VT LNG importer (Distrigas) and NH LNG trucking companies NY MA Over 250 “associate RI member” companies, from CT industry suppliers and contractors to electric grid operators NJ www.northeastgas.org North American Gas Pipeline System Map: National Petroleum Council Projected Demand Growth by Sector, Northeast U.S. Power generation remains the leading projected growth sector. New England Middle Atlantic 0.5 1 0.45 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.35 0.7 0.3 Residential 0.6 Residential Commercial 0.25 Commercial Industrial 0.5 Industrial Quadrillion Btu 0.2 Electric Gen. Quadrillion Btu 0.4 Electric Gen. 0.15 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.05 0.1 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, “2006 Annual Energy Outlook,” 1/06 Canadian Gas Exports to Northeast U.S. Canadian Exports to Northeast U.S., 1990 - 2005 1.2 1.0 0.8 Tcf 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: National Energy Board, Canada All new pipeline systems added in New York and New England since 1990 are linked to Canada (e.g., Iroquois, Empire, PNGTS, M&NE) Storage Levels / Commodity Price Projection Today: 3.177 Tcf 9/20/06: $4.87 /MMBtu Last Year: 2.821 Tcf 9/20/05: $12.76 /MMBtu Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Projected U.S. Supply Additions, 2005 - 2010 Source: Strategic Energy & Economic Research, Inc. Planned Northeast Pipeline Projects Prepared by NGA, 8-06, based on publicly available information. Project PNGTS, “Recent Open locations approximate. Season” Tennessee, “Northeast Iroquois, ConneXion M&NE, National Fuel “MarketAccess NE” “Phase IV Gas, “Empire Expansion” Connector Expansion” Project” Columbia, DTE Tennessee, “Atlantic Energy, VERMONT Supply Expansion” KeySpan, “Millennium” Tennessee, “Essex – Middlesex Project” Duke/Algonquin, “Cape Cod Lateral” Iroquois, Duke/KeySpan, “Brookhaven “Islander East” Lateral” Tennessee, “Northeast ConneXion Williams, “Leidy to Williams, “Sentinel Algonquin, “Ramapo NY/NJ” Long Island” Expansion Project” Expansion” Existing & Proposed LNG Import Terminals, Northeast Blue = In-service [Distrigas] Yellow = Approved by FERC NEWFOUNDLAND 2 Orange = Approved by Canadian regulators Green = Proposed 1 QUEBEC QUEBEC 4 3 6 5 ONTARIO 7 8 Proposed Terminals 1. Rabaska, Levis-Beaumont, QU: 0.5 Bcf/d (Gaz Métro, Gaz de France, Enbridge) 2. Gros Cacouna Energy, QU: 0.5 Bcf/d (TransCanada, Petro-Canada) 9 3. Canaport LNG, St. John, NB: 0.75 to 1 Bcf/d (Irving Oil, Repsol) 10 4. Bear Head LNG, Point Tupper, NS: 0.75 to 1 Bcf/d (Anadarko) 5. Maple LNG, Goldboro, NS: 1.0 to 2.0 Bcf/d (Keltic Petrochemicals, 11 4Gas, Suntera) 6. Downeast LNG, Robbinston, ME: 0.5 Bcf/d (Kestrel Energy Partners) 13 7. Quoddy LNG, Pleasant Point, ME: 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay LLC) 12 8. BP Consulting LNG, near Calais, ME: (BP Consulting LLC) 9. Northeast Gateway Project, Off Cape Ann, MA: 0.4 Bcf/d (Excelerate Energy) 10. Neptune LNG, Off Cape Ann, MA: 0.4 Bcf/d (SUEZ Energy Resources) 11. AES Battery Rock, Outer Brewster Island, Boston Harbor: (AES Corp.) 14 12. Weaver’s Cove LNG, Fall River, MA: 0.4 to 0.8 Bcf/d (Hess LNG) 15 13. KeySpan LNG, Providence, RI: 0.5 Bcf/d (KeySpan & BG LNG) 14. Broadwater Energy, offshore Long Island, NY: 1 Bcf/d (TransCanada Map source: U.S. FERC; Updated and Shell US Gas & Power) by NGA based on public information 15. Safe Harbor Energy, off south shore, Long Island, NY: 1 Bcf/d (Atlantic MARYLAND 16 as of 9-06. Locations approximate. Sea Island Group) Not all pipeline systems shown. 16. Crown Landing LNG, Logan Township, NJ: 1.2 Bcf/d (BP) Canaport™ LNG – Aerial View Courtesy of Repsol (August 31st) Existing & Potential Eastern Canadian Supplies Quebec Offshore Newfoundland Potential exploration White Rose Field; estimate in the St. Lawrence of 2.7 Tcf of gas region New Brunswick Potential development McCully natural gas within next decade field; planned development of small field by Corridor Resources Offshore Nova Scotia Future Potential Deep Panuke field; Offshore Nova Scotia Projected in-service date of Current Production 2010 SOEP producing since 1999; 400-500 MMcf/d Gas – Electric Interface Value of protocols – ISOs and gas industry Regular communication between ISOs and pipelines / Distrigas; committees (EGOC) – Winter and summer For the power sector, gas contract terms remain a key issue (firm vs. non-firm); gas system is designed to meet firm market commitments; no guarantees for non-firm arrangements Generators for most part not making investments in gas system infrastructure. Upcoming Meetings.
Recommended publications
  • A NEWSLETTER from the CAPE ANN VERNAL POND TEAM Winter/Spring 2015 Website: Email: [email protected]
    A NEWSLETTER from the CAPE ANN VERNAL POND TEAM Winter/Spring 2015 Website: www.capeannvernalpond.org Email: [email protected] THE CAVPT IS A HOPELESSLY NON-PROFIT VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO VERNAL POND CONSERVATION AND EDUCATION SINCE 1990. This year we celebrate our 25th anniversary. With the help, inspiration, and commitment of a lot of people we’ve come a long way! Before we get into our own history we have to give a nod to Roger Ward Babson (1875-1967) who had the foresight to • The Pole’s Hill ladies - led by Nan Andrew, Virginia Dench, preserve the watershed land in the center of Cape Ann known as and Dina Enos were inspirational as a small group of people who Dogtown. His love of Dogtown began as a young boy when he organized to preserve an important piece of land; the Vernal Pond would accompany his grandfather on Sunday afternoon walks to Team was inspired by their success. Hey, you really can make a difference! bring rock salt to the cows that grazed there. After his grandfa- ther passed away he continued the • CAVPT received its first grant ($200 from tradition with his father, Nathaniel. New England Herpetological Society) for When Nathaniel died in 1927 Roger film and developing to aid in certifying pools. began purchasing tracts of land to preserve Dogtown. In all he purchased • By 1995 we certified our first pools, the 1,150 acres, which he donated to cluster of nine ponds on Nugent Stretch at the City of Gloucester in 1932, to be old Rockport Road (where the vernal pond used as a park and watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation
    The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality Department Report ENQUAD 2008-12 Jiang MS, Zhou M. 2008. The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation. Boston: Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. Report 2008-12. 58 pp. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Boston, Massachusetts The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation Prepared by: Mingshun Jiang & Meng Zhou Department of Environmental, Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125 July 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Boston Harbor, Massachusetts Bay and Cape Cod Bay system (MBS) is a semi- enclosed coastal system connected to the Gulf of Maine (GOM) through boundary exchange. Both natural processes including climate change, seasonal variations and episodic events, and human activities including nutrient inputs and fisheries affect the physical and biogeochemical environment in the MBS. Monitoring and understanding of physical–biogeochemical processes in the MBS is important to resource management and environmental mitigation. Since 1992, the Massachusetts Water Resource Authority (MWRA) has been monitoring the MBS in one of the nation’s most comprehensive monitoring programs. Under a cooperative agreement between the MWRA and University of Massachusetts Boston (UMB), the UMB modeling team has conducted numerical simulations of the physical–biogeochemical conditions and processes in the MBS during 2000-2004. Under a new agreement between MWRA, Battelle and UMB, the UMB continues to conduct a numerical simulation for 2005, a year in which the MBS experienced an unprecedented red–tide event that cost tens of millions dollars to Massachusetts shellfish industry. This report presents the model validation and simulated physical environment in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • March 28 2018 Compensation Committee Meeting Packet
    NANTUCKET REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 20 R South Water Street Nantucket, MA 02554 Phone: 508-325-9571 TTY: 508-325-7516 [email protected] www.nrtawave.com AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE of the NRTA ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 28, 2018 10:00 a.m. TOWN HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 16 BROAD STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS OPEN SESSION I. Approval of Minutes of the March 22, 2017 Meeting. II. Evaluate Compensation for Authority Executive per 801 CMR 53.00. NANTUCKET REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 20 R South Water Street Nantucket, MA 02554 Phone: 508-325-9571 TTY: 508-325-7516 [email protected] www.nrtawave.com Compensation Committee DRAFT Minutes of the Compensation Committee Meeting of March 22, 2017. The meeting took place in the Community Room of the Nantucket Police Station, 4 Fairgrounds Road, Nantucket, MA 02554. Members of the Board present were: Jim Kelly, Robert DeCosta, Rick Atherton, Matthew Fee, and Dawn Hill Holdgate. Absent: Karenlynn Williams. Chairman Kelly opened the meeting at 6:02 p.m. Approval of Minutes of the March 23, 2016 Meeting. The minutes of the March 23, 2016 meeting were approved by unanimous consent of the Board. Evaluate Compensation for Authority Executive per 801 CMR 53.00. Paula Leary, NRTA Administrator informed the Board that the prior fiscal year salary, benefits and comparison lists of the regional transit authorities have been provided to the Board. As required under 081 CMR 53 the Board is to look at RTA executive positions in comparison to the NRTA Administrator. Paula Leary, NRTA Administrator stated a 5% COLA is being requested.
    [Show full text]
  • CPB1 C10 WEB.Pdf
    338 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 1, Chapter 10 Chapter 1, Pilot Coast U.S. 70°45'W 70°30'W 70°15'W 71°W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 1—Chapter 10 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 71°W 13279 Cape Ann 42°40'N 13281 MASSACHUSETTS Gloucester 13267 R O B R A 13275 H Beverly R Manchester E T S E C SALEM SOUND U O Salem L G 42°30'N 13276 Lynn NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN Boston MASSACHUSETTS BAY 42°20'N 13272 BOSTON HARBOR 26 SEP2021 13270 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 1, Chapter 10 ¢ 339 Cape Ann to Boston Harbor, Massachusetts (1) This chapter describes the Massachusetts coast along and 234 miles from New York. The entrance is marked on the northwestern shore of Massachusetts Bay from Cape its eastern side by Eastern Point Light. There is an outer Ann southwestward to but not including Boston Harbor. and inner harbor, the former having depths generally of The harbors of Gloucester, Manchester, Beverly, Salem, 18 to 52 feet and the latter, depths of 15 to 24 feet. Marblehead, Swampscott and Lynn are discussed as are (11) Gloucester Inner Harbor limits begin at a line most of the islands and dangers off the entrances to these between Black Rock Danger Daybeacon and Fort Point. harbors. (12) Gloucester is a city of great historical interest, the (2) first permanent settlement having been established in COLREGS Demarcation Lines 1623. The city limits cover the greater part of Cape Ann (3) The lines established for this part of the coast are and part of the mainland as far west as Magnolia Harbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Ann Museum 2 0 1 2 Annual Report
    CAPE ANN MUSEUM 2 0 1 2 A N N U A L REPORT OUR MISSION To foster an appreciation of the quality and Dear Friends, diversity of life on Cape Ann, past and present; It is with great pleasure that we present our 2012 Annual Report. To further the knowledge and enjoyment For 140 years, the Cape Ann Museum has embodied and promot- of Cape Ann history and art; ed the rich historic and artistic legacy of our region. It is a legacy To collect and preserve significant of which we are very proud. This annual recounting is both a cel- information and artifacts; and, ebration of the milestones we reached during the past year, and, To encourage community involvement we hope, a catalyst for future accomplishments. in our programs and holdings. A few years ago, as part of our Strategic Plan (2010 –2016), we In all our activities, the Museum emphasizes set on the path to become one of the best small museums in the the highest standards of quality. country. We are pleased to report that we are on our way. 2012 was an amazing year: • Membership, attendance and support reached all time highs due to your generosity and to the commitment of our board, staff and volunteers. • We honored our maritime heritage with the exhibition Ships at Sea. • We drew connections between Cape Ann’s creative past and the work of contemporary artists with the exhibitions Marsden Hartley: Soliloquy in Dogtown and Sarah Hollis Perry and Rachel Perry Welty’s water, water. • We initiated the Fitz Henry Lane Online project, a “digital” catalogue raisonné, which promises to put the Cape Ann Museum at the forefront of Lane scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality
    Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality Department Report 2018-07 Citation: Werme C, Keay KE, Libby PS, Codiga DL, Taylor DI, Charlestra L, Carroll SR. 2018. 2017 outfall monitoring overview. Boston: Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. Report 2018-07. 53 p. Cover photo credits clockwise from top left: Sea anemones and other organisms on an outfall riser in Massachusetts Bay: Barbara Hecker and Normandeau Associates Sediment sampling in Boston’s Inner Harbor: Chris Baker, Normandeau Associates Winter flounder in eelgrass bed: Chris Pickerell, (NOAA Fisheries file photo) 2017 Outfall Monitoring Overview prepared by Christine Werme Independent Consultant Oakland, CA 94612 Kenneth E. Keay Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality Department 100 First Avenue Charlestown Navy Yard Boston, MA 02129 P. Scott Libby Battelle 72 Main Street Topsham, ME 04086 Daniel L. Codiga, David I. Taylor, Lucner Charlestra, Sally R. Carroll Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality Department 100 First Avenue Charlestown Navy Yard Boston, MA 02129 November 5, 2018 2017 Outfall Monitoring Panel and Committees Outfall Monitoring Science Advisory Panel (OMSAP) Robert Beardsley, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Robert Kenney, University of Rhode Island Judy Pederson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sea Grant Michael Shiaris, University of Massachusetts, Boston James Shine, Harvard School of Public Health Geoffrey Trussell, Northeastern University Marine Science Center Juanita Urban-Rich,
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluation of Earthquake Potential and Source in the Vicinity of Newburyport, Massachusetts
    RE-EVALUATION OF EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL AND SOURCE IN THE VICINITY OF NEWBURYPORT, MASSACHUSETTS Final Technical Report Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award 1434-04HQGR0049 Martitia P. Tuttle M. Tuttle & Associates 128 Tibbetts Lane Georgetown, ME 04548 Tel: 207-371-2007 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.mptuttle.com Project Period: 1/1/2004-12/30/2005 Program Element II: Research on Earthquake Occurrence and Effects Key Words: Paleoliquefaction, Tsunami Geology, Recurrence Interval, Age Dating The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. RE-EVALUATION OF EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL AND SOURCE IN THE VICINITY OF NEWBURYPORT, MASSACHUSETTS Martitia P. Tuttle M. Tuttle & Associates 128 Tibbetts Lane Georgetown, ME 04548 Tel: 207-371-2007 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In the early 1990s, a search for and study of liquefaction features induced by the 1727 Newburyport earthquake also found paleoliquefaction features that formed sometime in the past 4,000 years. Because the ages of the paleoliquefaction features were poorly constrained, the number and timing of the paleoearthquakes responsible for the features were not estimated. In addition, the area over which the earthquake(s) induced liquefaction was not determined, limiting interpretations of earthquake location and magnitude. Picking up where the 1990s study left off, a more recent effort attempted to relocate other liquefaction sites reported during the 1727 earthquake in the hopes of finding additional paleoliquefaction features.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Fishes of Massachusetts Bay
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/NEC-51 This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose Information, and has not received complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing. An Annotated List of the Fishes of Massachusetts Bay Bruce B. Collette 1,2and Karsten E. Hartel 3 1Marine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA 07907 2National Systematics Labbratory; National Marine Fisheries Service, National Museum 3 of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02 138 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE C. William Verity, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration J. Curtis Mack II, Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service William E. Evans, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Northeast Fisheries Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts February 1988 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ABSTRACT The list includes 141 species in 68 families based on authoritative literature reports and museum specimens. First records for Massachusetts Bay are recorded for: Atlantic angel shark, Squatina dumerill smooth skate, Raja senta;= wolf eelpout, Lycenchelys verrillii; lined seahorse, DHippo-us erectus; rough scad, Trachurus lathami smallmouth flounder, iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................. 1 ANNOTATED LIST................................................ 5 Hagfishes. Family Myxinidae 1. Atlantic hagfish. Myxine slutinosa Linnaeus. 5 Lampreys. Family Petromyzontidae 2. Sea lamprey. Petromyzon marinus Linnaeus. 5 Sand sharks.Family Odontaspididae 3. Sand tiger. Euqomphodus taurus (Rafinesque) . 5 Thresher sharks. Family Alopiidae 4. Thresher shark. Alopias vulpinus (Bonnaterre) . 6 Mackerel sharks. Family Lamnidae 5. White shark. Carcharodon carcharim (Linnaeus) . 6 6. Basking shark. Cetohinus maximus (Gunnerus) . 7. Shortfin mako.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 a Shared Vision: the Rise of the Cape Ann Art Colonies, 1890-1920
    PORTRAIT of a PLACE CHAPTER 5 A Shared Vision CHAPTER 5 A Shared Vision The Rise of the Cape Ann Art Colonies, 1890–1920 Artists at work on Lighthouse Beach, Sept. 21, 1896. Left to right: Poland (model), Potthast, Bicknell, Jones, Buhler. Photo by George B. Wood. Artists Turned to Europe By 1900, art colonies attracting both European and art colonies brought the idea back home and recreated American artists had established themselves in several the atmosphere of conviviality and communal experi- places in America. This period was known as the Pro- ence here. Gloucester’s scenic neighborhoods inspired a gressive Era. It was a time when social activism and po- number of loosely affiliated groups of artists who shared litical reform spread across the United States to combat common aesthetic visions to live and work together. the rise in government corruption and abuses of power. The era of the teaching artist also began at this time, America was no longer rejoicing in an expanding and drawing professional students and tourists to the area and exuberant American identity. adding to the attraction of the colonies. Many artists turned to Europe for artistic ideas. Most American artists went overseas temporarily to work, but The art colonies and their artists benefited from some stayed on as expatriates, including James McNeill changing views of art and an expanding market. In the Whistler (1834–1903), Mary Cassatt (1844–1926) and last quarter of the nineteenth century, painting, sculp- John Singer Sargent (1856–1925). Those who went for ture and classical music were highly valued as tools for limited periods brought the new French style, Impres- education and the assimilation of urban immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan
    TOWN OF HULL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE Final Plan Adopted by the Town April 26, 2018 TOWN OF HULL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] 2 TOWN OF HULL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CREDITS This plan was prepared for the Town of Hull by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) under the direction of the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). MAPC Officers President: Keith Bergman Vice President: Erin Wortman Secretary: Sandra Hackman Treasurer: Taber Keally Executive Director: Marc D. Draisen Credits Project Manager Martin Pillsbury Lead Project Planner: Anne Herbst Mapping/GIS Services: Susan Brunton Eliza Wallace Ryan Melendez Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Director: Kurt Schwartz Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner: Leo Roy Hull Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Chris Krahforst Conservation Administrator Chris DiIorio Planning and Community Development Director Phillip Lemnios Town Manager Joyce Sullivan Public Health Director Chris Russo Fire Chief Bartley Kelly Building Inspector Kurt Bornheim Harbormaster Jim Dow Public Works Director John Struzziery Wastewater Operations Director John Dunn Police Chief Panos Takadjian Light Plant Operations Manager 3 TOWN OF HULL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] 4 TOWN OF HULL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section # Section Page I. Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 5 III. Planning Process and Public Participation 11 IV. Risk Assessment 17 V. Hazard Mitigation Goals 62 VI. Existing Mitigation Measures 64 VII. Mitigation Measures from the 2012 Plan 72 VIII. Hazard Mitigation Strategy 77 IX. Plan Adoption and Maintenance 87 X.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Ann Anchor Works Collection
    CAPE ANN ANCHOR WORKS COLLECTION Creator: Cape Ann Anchor Works Dates: 1880-1972 Quantity: 6.5 linear feet (1 document box, 6 cartons) Acquisition: Accession #: 1998.13 ; Donated by: Eric Ronnberg Identification: A86; Archive Collection #86 Citation: [Document Title]. The Cape Ann Anchor Works Collection, [Box #, Folder #, Item #], Cape Ann Museum Library & Archives, Gloucester, MA. Copyright: Requests for permission to publish material from this collection should be addressed to the Librarian/Archivist. Language: English Finding Aid: Jane W. Mead, 2017, supervised by Stephanie Buck, Librarian/Archivist Historical Sketch The Cape Ann Anchor Works originated in a blacksmith shop owed by Benjamin Haskell in 1823 where he made hand forged anchors for the Gloucester fishing fleet. In partnership with others, Haskell opened a forge on Vincent’s Cove in 1859 where he was able to make 500- pound anchors. The company was incorporated in 1866 as the Cape Ann Anchor Works. The anchor works and its smokey forge were surrounded in Vincent’s Cove by fish processing companies and their fish flakes. In 1880, John Pew & Sons paid the Cape Ann Anchor Works to move to Whittemore Street where it enlarged its plant and engaged in general forging in addition to anchor-making. Later named Cape Anchor Works and Forging Company, the company produced axels and crankshafts for heavy industry and its products were shipped Cape Ann Anchor Works – A86 – page 2 throughout the United States and to Canada. The company stopped making anchors in 1916 but expanded its operations to supply the military with marine forgings during the First and Second World Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitz Henry Lane's Series Paintings of Brace's Rock: Meaning and Technique
    Fitz Henry Lane’s Series Paintings of Brace’s Rock: Meaning and Technique FITZ HENRY LANE’S SERIES PAINTINGS OF BRACE’S ROCK: MEANING AND TECHNIQUE A report concerning the relationship of Lane’s painting series, Brace’s Rock Cape Ann Museum, Gloucester, MA (CAM) National Gallery of Art, Washington DC (NGA) Terra Foundation for American Art, Chicago (TFAA) By H. Travers Newton, Jr., Consultant, Painting Conservation Studio, Cleveland Museum of Art Based on collaborative research with Marcia Steele, Chief Conservator, Cleveland Museum of Art Prepared for Elizabeth Kennedy, Curator of Collection, edited by Peter John Brownlee, Associate Curator, with the assistance of Naomi H. Slipp, Curatorial Intern, Terra Foundation for American Art April, 2010 ©2010 H. Travers Newton, Jr. 1 Table of Contents Project Introduction and Summary, 3 Part One: Review of the Literature I. Historical Background of Lane’s Images of Brace’s Rock, 4 II. Thematic Inspirations, Interpretations and Precedents: 1. Shipwrecks, 6 2. Nineteenth-Century Panorama Drawings and Paintings in the United States, 12 3. Influence of Thomas Doughty’s Nahant Beach Series, 14 4. Influence of Thomas Chambers, 16 5. Possible European Influences: Dutch Landscapes, 17 6. British Influences: John Ruskin and the Depiction of Rock Formations, 17 7. German and Danish Influences: Caspar David Friedrich and Christoffer Wilhelm Eckersberg, 20 Part Two: New Conservation Research on the Brace’s Rock Series, 21 III. Comparison of National Gallery of Art and Cape Ann Museum Versions of Brace’s Rock 1. Relationship of the Field Sketch to the Paintings: The Setting, 22 2. Absence of Reflections in Lane’s Drawings, 24 3.
    [Show full text]