DOCSLIB.ORG

February 2020 Public Board Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRESS RECOGNITION PANEL BOARD MEETING 48th meeting of the Press Recognition Panel 09:00, Tuesday 25 February 2020 Mappin House, 4 Winsley Street, London W1W 8HF AGENDA Indicative timings Public session 1. Welcome Chair 09:00 2. Apologies for absence Chair 09:00 3. Declarations of interest Chair 09:00 4. Minutes of the meeting held on 10 December 2019, outstanding actions and matters arising Chair 09:00 – 09:05 For noting 5. Chief Executive’s report – December 2019 SU 09:05 – 09:10 Paper PRP131(19) For noting 6. Chief Executive’s report – January 2020 SU 09:10 – 09:15 Paper PRP01(20) For noting 7. Chief Executive’s report – February 2020 SU 09:15 – 09:20 Paper PRP02(20) For noting 8. Finance report – January 2020 SU 09:20 – 09:30 Paper PRP03(20) For noting 9. Governance procedures and policies Chair 09:30 – 09:45 review Paper PRP04(20) For decision 10. Any other business and close of public session Chair 09:45 – 09:50 Including comments from the floor Confidential session 11. Minutes of the meeting held on 10 December 2019, outstanding actions and matters arising Chair 09:50 – 10:00 For noting 12. Board succession planning Chair 10:00 – 10:15 Paper PRP05(20) For decision 13. Draft business plan and budget 2020-21 SU 10:15 – 10:25 Paper PRP06(20) For discussion 14. Quarterly risk register review SU 10:25 – 10:35 Paper PRP07(20) For decision 15. IT update SU 10:35 – 10:45 Paper PRP08(20) For decision 16. Update on the 2019 annual report on the SU 10:45 – 11:15 Recognition system Paper PRP09(20) For decision 17. Any other business and close of meeting Chair 11:15 – 11:20 Date and time of next meeting: 28 April 2020, at Mappin House, 4 Winsley Street, London W1W 8HF, starting at 09:00. DRAFT PRESS RECOGNITION PANEL Minutes of the 47th meeting of the Press Recognition Panel Board held on 10 December 19 at Mappin House, 4 Winsley Street, London W1W 8HF Present: David Wolfe QC (Chair), Harry Cayton, Emma Gilpin Jacobs, Carolyn Regan and Harry Rich In attendance: Susie Uppal (Chief Executive), Saima Ansari, Paul Nezandonyi, and Adam Gibbs BOARD MEETING – PUBLIC SESSION Welcome 1. The Chair welcomed Members and attendees to the forty seventh meeting of the Press Recognition Panel. Declaration of members’ interests 2. There were no new interests to declare. Minutes of the meeting held on 29 October 2019, outstanding actions and matters arising 3. The draft minutes of the meeting held on 29 October 2019 were noted as factually correct and agreed. 4. The Board noted that there were no other matters arising that were not covered elsewhere on the Agenda. Chief Executive’s report – November 2019 – Paper PRP125(19) 5. The Board noted that three recruitment companies had been invited to quote, on a without commitment basis, for the executive search, selection and assessment for two Board members. Presentations were scheduled page 1 of 4 for 21 January 2020 with advertisements anticipated to be placed in mid- February 2020. 6. The Board noted IMPRESS’ appointment of two new Board members, Shelina Janmohamed and Pam Vick. The Board noted that the Executive had assessed the details of the process provided by IMPRESS and considered that the appointments comply with criterion 4 of the Charter. 7. The Board noted the contents of the CEO report and the external matters update with thanks. Finance report – October 2019 – Paper PRP126(19) 8. The Board noted the latest financial position as at 31 October 2019. The Board were presented with the management accounts for the period ended 30 November 2019 and noted that the reforecast included £7000 for the state of recognition report that were not yet incurred. The November accounts would be circulated with the December CEO report for consideration by the Board. Board and Independent members’ remuneration - Paper PRP127(19) 9. The Board discussed the remuneration rates and the anticipated work commitment for the coming year. The recruitment and interviewing of potential Board members would generate an increase in the Board’s time commitment in 2020. The benchmarking exercise demonstrated that there had been a marginal increase in the rates payable for both the Chair and the Board. 10. It was noted that the Board remuneration has remained unchanged for the last 5 years since the PRP came into legal existence on 3 November 2014. The Board noted that notwithstanding the variances in the workload, the roles required particular skill sets to provide an effective Board, especially noting the Chair’s legal knowledge. 11. The Board discussed the Chair’s remuneration with the Chair absent from the room for the purposes of this part of the discussion. The Board agreed that the Chair’s remuneration should remain unchanged. The Chair joined the Board for the discussion on the members’ remuneration and the Board agreed that the rates should remain unchanged at present. The Board agreed that a discussion would be held with the recruiters on remuneration rates as part of the wider discussion on in 2020 and this would be considered by the Board. page 2 of 4 Any other business and close of public session 12. None raised. BOARD MEETING – CONFIDENTIAL SESSION Minutes of the meeting held on 29 October 2019, outstanding actions and matters arising 13. The confidential section of the Minutes were recorded as factually correct and agreed, subject to the release of information redacted in paragraphs 19 and 29. 14. The Board noted that there were no other matters arising that were not covered elsewhere on the Agenda. Business continuity review - Paper PRP128(19) 15. The Board considered a paper that provided an update on the business continuity arrangements in place in the event of an emergency and the recommended interim arrangements in respect of Executive staff succession. 16. The ARC had considered the business continuity arrangements in place at its meeting on 29 October 2019 and noted that the flexible working construct had significantly reduced the risk in respect of staff not being able to work due to an emergency affecting access to the Mappin House office. 17. The Committee had discussed the business continuity plan for the PRP in terms of staff succession planning and the Chair of the ARC confirmed that the paper reflected the Committee’s aim of having a robust mitigation plan in place. The Committee’s concern had been that in the event of an emergency, there would be an issue for the Board to access information. Comis had confirmed that the Chair and his nominated representative would be provided with access. 18. It was noted that in the event of an emergency, the tenderers for the Board appointments could potentially assist with the recruitment for a CEO as they would have a good understanding of the PRP and its requirements. It was noted that the PRP’s partners all had built an in depth understanding of the organisation and would be in a good position to provide additional support as necessary. 19. The Chair informed the Board that he would refresh and familiarise himself with the shared electronic system. page 3 of 4 Quarterly risk register review - Paper PRP129(19) 20. - redacted 22. Board evaluation - Paper PRP130(19) 23. The Board noted and discussed the outputs from the Board evaluation exercise conducted during November 2019. It was noted that the Board continues to work well together and with the Executive and that this relationship has strengthened over the years. The Board observed that the members continued to maintain paper-free meetings effectively. 24. The Board discussed in particular the feedback provided by the members. The Board reiterated that diversity will be kept under scrutiny as part of the Board recruitment process. The Board agreed that the handover and exiting plans for the Board members will be considered in greater detail next year. Any other business and close of confidential session 25. None raised. Date and time of next meeting 26. The next scheduled meeting of the Board will take place at 09:00 on 25 February 2020 at Mappin House, 4 Winsley Street, London W1W 8HF. Drafted: Saima Ansari Executive Administration Manager Signed: David Wolfe QC Chair page 4 of 4 PRP131(19) PRESS RECOGNITION PANEL BOARD CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT – DECEMBER 2019 Meeting: by email Status: for noting Lead responsibility: Susie Uppal, Contact details: 020 3443 7072 Chief Executive Purpose 1. The purpose of this paper is to provide an update to the Board on Executive activity since the November 2019 CEO report. 2. The Board is invited to note the contents of the Chief Executive’s report. Executive summary 3. The Board is being updated in respect of organisational and financial matters. Delivery updates Finance Update 4. A bank-reconciled set of management accounts as at 30 November 2019 is attached at Annex A. The management accounts also include the 6-month reforecast carried out in October 2019. 5. The deficit for the period to date is £19,473 against the year to date forecast of £28,769. This represents a positive variance of £9,296 compared to the year to date forecast. Research update 6. Annex B includes an update on key external matters relevant to our work. Implications 7. The implications of decisions taken by the Board as set out in this paper are as follows: page 1 of 2 • Budget – There are no specific implications in addition to the issues referenced. • Legislation – no specific implications. • Resources – any resourcing considerations are referenced and there are no specific implications other than these. • Equality, Diversity and Inclusion – no specific implications.
Recommended publications
  • Nysba Spring 2020 | Vol

    Nysba Spring 2020 | Vol

    NYSBA SPRING 2020 | VOL. 31 | NO. 2 Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Journal A publication of the Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Section of the New York State Bar Association In This Issue n A Case of “Creative Destruction”: Takeaways from the 5Pointz Graffiti Dispute n The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation n The Battle Against the Bots: The Legislative Fight Against Ticket Bots ....and more www.nysba.org/EASL NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION In The Arena: A Sports Law Handbook Co-sponsored by the New York State Bar Association and the Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Section As the world of professional athletics has become more competitive and the issues more complex, so has the need for more reliable representation in the field of sports law. Written by dozens of sports law attorneys and medical professionals, In the Arena: A Sports Law Handbook is a reflection of the multiple issues that face athletes and the attorneys who represent them. Included in this book are chapters on representing professional athletes, NCAA enforcement, advertising, sponsorship, intellectual property rights, doping, concussion-related issues, Title IX and dozens of useful appendices. Table of Contents Intellectual Property Rights and Endorsement Agreements How Trademark Protection Intersects with the Athlete’s EDITORS Right of Publicity Elissa D. Hecker, Esq. Collective Bargaining in the Big Three David Krell, Esq. Agency Law Sports, Torts and Criminal Law PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES 2013 | 539 pages Role of Advertising and Sponsorship in the Business of Sports PN: 4002 (Print) Doping in Sport: A Historical and Current Perspective PN: 4002E (E-Book) Athlete Concussion-Related Issues Non-Members $80 Concussions—From a Neuropsychological and Medical Perspective NYSBA Members $65 In-Arena Giveaways: Sweepstakes Law Basics and Compliance Issues Order multiple titles to take advantage of our low flat Navigating the NCAA Enforcement Process rate shipping charge of $5.95 per order, regardless of the number of items shipped.
  • Litigating Corporate Complicity in Israeli Violations of International Law in the U.S

    Litigating Corporate Complicity in Israeli Violations of International Law in the U.S

    97 Corrie et al v. Caterpillar: Litigating Corporate Complicity in Israeli Violations of International Law in the U.S. Courts Grietje Baars* 1 INTRODUCTION1 In 2005 an attempt was made at enforcing international law against an American corporation said to be complicit in war crimes, extrajudicial killing and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment committed by the Israeli military. The civil suit, brought in a U.S. court, was dismissed without a hearing, in a brief statement mainly citing reasons of political expedience. The claimants in Corrie et al v. Caterpillar2 include relatives of several Palestinians, and American peace activist Rachel Corrie, who were killed or injured in the process of house demolitions carried out using Caterpillar’s D9 and D10 bulldozers. They brought a civil suit in a U.S. court under the Alien Tort Claims Act,3 for breaches of international law, seeking compensatory damages and an order to enjoin Caterpillar’s sale of bulldozers to Israel until its military stops its practice of house demolitions. An appeal is pending and will be decided on in the latter half of 2006. * PhD Candidate, University College London and Coordinator, International Criminal Law at the Institute of Law, Birzeit University. 1 The author thanks Victor Kattan, Jason Beckett, Jörg Kammerhofer, Akbar Rasulov, André de Hoogh, Anne Massagee, Reem Al-Botmeh and Munir Nuseibah for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Maria LaHood of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York for providing the documentation. Any mistakes are the author’s own. This article is an elaboration of a paper presented at the conference, “The Question of Palestine in International Law” at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, on 23-24 November 2005.
  • The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation by Amber Melville-Brown

    The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation by Amber Melville-Brown

    The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation By Amber Melville-Brown First Brexit, Now Megzit... trip back to the motherland In a move more resonant with players of the TV were dashed with the event show “Survival” than with members of the British royal postponed amid the CO- family, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex—Prince Harry VID-19 coronavirus pan- and Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex—blindsided demic, even ironically as his senior royals with a unilateral announcement that they father HRH Prince Charles intended to “carve out a progressive new role”1 within the himself actually succumbed royal family, and by the surprise launch of their own and tested positive for the independent website. The relatively sparsely populated virus. www.sussexroyal.com—including a personal statement The couple’s new social about their recently launched media litigation, reference media sites also suffered a to the Royal Rota media system that they are rejecting, blow; the new relationship and to the Information Commissioner’s Office public carved out in negotiations interest test under the Freedom of Information Act—sug- between the royal fam- gests strongly that it is the couple’s tense relationship ily and the couple as they venture out on their own saw with the media that has led them to seek a new “working them having to abandon use of the “Sussex Royal” brand model” in 2020. with which they heralded the new them, before the ink on Indeed, if this announcement was intended to foster the new branding was really even dry.
  • Alison Phillips Editor, Daily Mirror Media Masters – September 26, 2018 Listen to the Podcast Online, Visit

    Alison Phillips Editor, Daily Mirror Media Masters – September 26, 2018 Listen to the Podcast Online, Visit

    Alison Phillips Editor, Daily Mirror Media Masters – September 26, 2018 Listen to the podcast online, visit www.mediamasters.fm Welcome to Media Masters, a series of one to one interviews with people at the top of the media game. Today, I’m here in Canary Wharf, London, and at the offices of the Daily Mirror, joined by their editor in chief, Alison Phillips. Previously in charge of the Sunday Mirror and Sunday People, she was also launch editor of New Day, the short-lived newspaper, in 2016. She also leads on addressing gender imbalance at Mirror publisher Reach, heading up their Women Together network, and is this year’s Society of Editor’s popular columnist of the year. Alison, thank you for joining me. Hi. Alison, you were appointed in March. It must have been an incredibly proud moment for you, how is it going? It’s going really well, I think. I hope. It’s been a busy few months, because obviously Reach has bought the Express as well, so there have been a lot of issues going on. But in terms of the actual paper at the Mirror, I hope, I feel, that we’re reaching a point of sustained confidence, which is so important for a paper. We’ve had some real success on campaigns, which I think is really our lifeblood. And I think we’re managing to energise the staff, which is absolutely essential for a well-functioning newspaper. Is it more managerial at the moment with the organisational challenges that you’ve been dealing with? Because you must, as the leader of the business, as the editor, you’ve got so many things you could be doing, you’ve got to choose, having to prioritise.
  • Shadow Cabinet Meetings with Proprietors, Editors and Senior Media Executives

    Shadow Cabinet Meetings with Proprietors, Editors and Senior Media Executives

    Shadow Cabinet Meetings 1 June 2015 – 31 May 2016 Shadow cabinet meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives. Andy Burnham MP Shadow Secretary of State’s meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives Date Name Location Purpose Nature of relationship* 26/06/2015 Alison Phillips, Editor, Roast, The General Professional Sunday People Floral Hall, discussion London, SE1 Peter Willis, Editor, 1TL Daily Mirror 15/07/2015 Lloyd Embley, Editor in J Sheekey General Professional Chief, Trinity Mirror Restaurant, discussion 28-32 Saint Peter Willis, Editor, Martin's Daily Mirror Court, London WC2N 4AL 16/07/2015 Kath Viner, Editor in King’s Place Guardian daily Professional Chief, Guardian conference 90 York Way meeting London N1 2AP 22/07/2015 Evgeny Lebedev, Private General Professional proprieter, address discussion Independent/Evening Standard 04/08/2015 Lloyd Embley, Editor in Grosvenor General Professional Chief, Trinity Mirror Hotel, 101 discussion Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0SJ 16/05/2016 Eamonn O’Neal, Manchester General Professional Managing Editor, Evening Manchester Evening News, discussion News Mitchell Henry House, Hollinwood Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 8EF Other interaction between Shadow Secretary of State and proprietors, editors and senior media executives Date Name Location Purpose Nature of relationship* No such meetings Angela Eagle MP Shadow Secretary of State’s meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives Date Name Location Purpose Nature of relationship* No
  • The Journal of Media and Diversity Issue 02 Summer 2021

    The Journal of Media and Diversity Issue 02 Summer 2021

    Sir Lenny Henry, Amma Asante, Afua Hirsch, Kurt Barling, Chi Thai and Delphine Lievens, Nina Robinson, David Hevey, Melanie Gray, Debbie Christie, Gary Younge, Adrian Lester, So Mayer, Siobhán McGuirk, Selina Nwulu, Ciaran Thapar The Journal of Media and Diversity Issue 02 Summer 2021 1 REPRESENTOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF MEDIA AND DIVERSITY ISSUE 02 SUMMER 2021 REPRESENTOLOGY CONTENTS EDITORIAL The Journal of Media and Diversity 04 Developing Film Welcome to Issue Two of Representology - Sir Lenny Henry and Amma Asante The Journal of Media and Diversity. Since we Editorial Mission Statement interview. launched, many of you have shared 14 Finding My Voice encouraging words and ideas on how to help Welcome to Representology, a journal Afua Hirsch create a media more reflective of modern dedicated to research and best-practice 18 Putting the Black into Britain Britain. perspectives on how to make the media more Professor Kurt Barling representative of all sections of society. On March 30th, we hosted our first public event - an 24 The Exclusion Act: British East and South opportunity for all those involved to spell out their A starting point for effective representation are the East Asians in British Cinema visions for the journal and answer your questions. As “protected characteristics” defined by the Equality Act Chi Thai and Delphine Lievens Editor, I chaired a wide-ranging conversation on ‘Race 2010 including, but not limited to, race, gender, and the British Media’ with Sir Lenny Henry, Leah sexuality, and disability, as well as their intersections. 38 The Problem with ‘Urban’ Cowan, and Marcus Ryder. Our discussions and the We recognise that definitions of diversity and Nina Robinson responses to illuminating audience interventions gave representation are dynamic and constantly evolving 44 Sian Vasey - disability pioneer inside us a theme that runs through this issue - capturing and our content will aim to reflect this.
  • Digital Journalism Studies the Key Concepts

    Digital Journalism Studies the Key Concepts

    Digital Journalism Studies The Key Concepts FRANKLIN, Bob and CANTER, Lily <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5708-2420> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/26994/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version FRANKLIN, Bob and CANTER, Lily (2019). Digital Journalism Studies The Key Concepts. Routledge key guides . Routledge. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk <BOOK-PART><BOOK-PART-META><TITLE>The key concepts</TITLE></BOOK- PART-META></BOOK-PART> <BOOK-PART><BOOK-PART-META><TITLE>Actants</TITLE></BOOK-PART- META> <BODY>In a special issue of the journal Digital Journalism, focused on reconceptualizsing key theoretical changes reflecting the development of Digital Journalism Studies, Seth Lewis and Oscar Westlund seek to clarify the role of what they term the “four A’s” – namely the human actors, non-human technological actants, audiences and the involvement of all three groups in the activities of news production (Lewis and Westlund, 2014). Like Primo and Zago, Lewis and Westlund argue that innovations in computational software require scholars of digital journalism to interrogate not simply who but what is involved in news production and to establish how non-human actants are disrupting established journalism practices (Primo and Zago, 2015: 38). The examples of technological actants
  • National Recognition of Our Armed Forces

    National Recognition of Our Armed Forces

    Report of Inquiry into National Recognition of our Armed Forces Report to the Prime Minister by: Quentin Davies MP Bill Clark OBE Ministry of Defence Air Commodore Martin Sharp OBE MA RAF Report of Inquiry into National Recognition of our Armed Forces Report to the Prime Minister by: Quentin Davies MP Bill Clark OBE Ministry of Defence Air Commodore Martin Sharp OBE MA RAF May 2008 Foreword Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP One of the greatest privileges I’ve enjoyed since becoming Prime Minister has been to spend time with the extraordinarily skilled and dedicated men and women of our Armed Forces, and to visit them on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their courage, their service and their professionalism make an immeasurable contribution both to building peace and stability around the world and to protecting our nation here at home. The Government is acutely aware of the debt we owe our Armed Forces, and our gratitude for the work they do in the service of our country is reflected in our recent initiatives on pay, on tax-free bonuses, on housing and on health care, as well as in our decision to commission a Command Paper on conditions of service and quality of life, which we will be publishing this summer. But beyond these individual initiatives, important though they are, it is vital for our serving men and women, especially those engaged in difficult and dangerous overseas campaigns, to know that the whole of Britain understands and appreciates the work that they do in our name. I believe the British public are fully behind the men and women of our Armed Forces, and people want to do more to pay tribute to them.
  • Worth 1000 Words Illustrated Reportage Makes a Comeback Contents

    Worth 1000 Words Illustrated Reportage Makes a Comeback Contents

    MAGAZINE OF THE NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS WWW.NUJ.ORG.UK | OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2019 Worth 1000 words Illustrated reportage makes a comeback Contents Main feature 16 Drawing the news The re-emergence of illustrated news News t’s an incredible time to be a journalist if 03 Recognition win at Vice UK you’re involved in Brexit coverage in any way. The extraordinary has become the Agreement after 3-year campaign norm and every day massive stories and 04 Barriers to women photographers twists and turns are guaranteed. Conference shares best practice IIn this edition of The Journalist, Raymond Snoddy celebrates this boom time for journalists 05 UN told of BBC persian plight and journalism in his column. And in an extract from his latest Threats to journalists’ families book, Denis MacShane looks at the role of the press in Brexit. 06 TUC news Extraordinary times also provide the perfect conditions for What the NUJ had to say and more cartoons and satirical illustration. In our cover feature Rachel Broady looks at the re-emergence of illustrated reportage, a “form of journalism that came to prominence in Victorian Features times – and arguably before that with the social commentary of 10 Payment changed my life Hogarth. The work of charity NUJ Extra A picture can indeed be worth 1,000 words. But some writers can also paint wonderfully evocative pictures with their deft 12 Fleet Street pioneers use of words. And on that note, it’s a pleasure to have Paul Women in the top jobs Routledge back in the magazine with a piece on his battle to 14 Database miners free his email address from a voracious PR database.
  • Accuracy, Independence, Impartiality

    Accuracy, Independence, Impartiality

    Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper University of Oxford ACCURACY, INDEPENDENCE, AND IMPARTIALITY: How legacy media and digital natives approach standards in the digital age by Kellie Riordan Trinity Term 2014 Sponsor: Australian Broadcasting Corporation 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the digital age, one of the most complex challenges for media outlets is how to re- shape the editorial responsibilities of journalism itself. Which journalistic standards, many devised last century, still fit in the digital age? And which standards form the basis of a new type of journalism being pioneered by hybrid news sites that have come of age in the digital era? This paper focuses on the key editorial standards of accuracy, independence, and impartiality, and examines how these three principles are approached in the digital era. The paper then concentrates on three legacy organisations (the Guardian, the New York Times, and the BBC) and three digital outlets (Quartz, BuzzFeed, and Vice News) and the measures each outlet takes to uphold editorial integrity. Based on interviews with a wide range of industry experts, scholars and representatives of both traditional and new media, the paper asks two key questions: what can legacy organisations with hundreds of years of history learn from how digital natives approach standards? Which traditional journalistic standards held by legacy organisations should be more firmly adopted by newcomers? Finally, this paper argues a third form of journalism is emerging; one that combines the best of legacy standards with the new approaches of digital natives. Such a hybrid form requires a more streamlined, contemporary set of editorial standards that fit the internet era.
  • MICHAEL GOVE - MEETINGS with MEDIA ORGANISATIONS – 6 May 2010 – 15 July 2011

    MICHAEL GOVE - MEETINGS with MEDIA ORGANISATIONS – 6 May 2010 – 15 July 2011

    MICHAEL GOVE - MEETINGS WITH MEDIA ORGANISATIONS – 6 May 2010 – 15 July 2011 This list sets out the Secretary of State’s meetings with senior media executives for the period May 2010-July 2011. This includes all meetings with proprietors, senior executives and editors of media organisations for both newspapers and broadcast media. It does not include those meetings with journalists that ended up in interviews that appeared in the public domain, either in newspapers and magazines. It may also exclude some larger social events at which senior media executives may have been present. This is the fullest possible list assembled from the Secretary of State’s Parliamentary diary, their departmental diary, personal diary and memory. Every effort has been taken to ensure that this is as accurate as possible but the nature of such an extensive exercise means something may have inadvertently got missed. Declaration of interest: The Secretary of State worked for the BBC from 1991 to 1995 and News International from 1996 to 2005. He wrote a weekly column for News International from 2005 to 2009. His wife currently works for The Times and has done so since 1998. Secretary of State, Michael Gove Date of Name of Media Organisation Purpose of Meeting Meeting 19 May 2010 Rupert Murdoch (News Corporation), Dinner and general Rebekah Brooks (News International), discussion plus more than ten others. 28 May 2010 Bill Kristol (Weekly Standard), plus Dinner and general several others discussion 30 May 2010 Alan Rusbridger (The Guardian), Jon Dinner at the Hay
  • Applications for Passes and Conditions of Accreditation

    Applications for Passes and Conditions of Accreditation

    ROYAL COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONAL NOTE 15th September 2016 The Duke of Cambridge will give the keynote address at Tusk's Time For Change event, The Shard, London Thursday 22nd September 2016 Engagement (For publication or broadcast): The Duke of Cambridge is to give the keynote address at Time For Change, an important multi-city event taking place on the eve of one of the most crucial international conferences on the protection of endangered species in many years. Time For Change is being organised by the conservation charity, Tusk, of which His Royal Highness is Royal Patron. The Duke will speak at The View from The Shard in London, with other contributors taking part via satellite link-up from Tokyo and Johannesburg. The entire event will be live streamed. The aim is to draw global attention to the continuing threat to many of the world's species from the Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT), and the need to maintain momentum in tackling the issue. Time For Change will take place as government delegates from all over the world gather in South Africa for the 17th meeting of parties to the Convention for International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Background (For publication or broadcast): Time For Change Time For Change seeks to ensure that the momentum gained over the last three years in tackling the Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT) is not only maintained but stepped up. The event will urge the international community including consumers not to become complacent at such a critical moment for many of the world’s most iconic species. Page 1 of 7 From the 69th floor of London's iconic Shard building, The Duke of Cambridge will address an audience of supporters, campaigners and policymakers.