DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Republican River Basin: Nebraska and Kansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Republican River Basin: Nebraska and Kansas University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers U.S. Department of the Interior 2005 Lower Republican River Basin: Nebraska and Kansas Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons "Lower Republican River Basin: Nebraska and Kansas" (2005). U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers. 38. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub/38 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of the Interior at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Appraisal Report Lower Republican River Basin Nebraska and Kansas January 2005 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ............................................................................................ vii Chapter 1 ─ Introduction......................................................................................1 1.1 Authority ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of this Appraisal Study .............................................1 1.3 Objectives.................................................................................................1 1.4 Project Area and Description ...................................................................2 1.5 Prior Studies, Reports, and Existing Water Projects ................................4 1.6 Consultation and Meetings.......................................................................5 Chapter 2 ─ Problems and Needs.........................................................................7 2.1 Republican River Compact ......................................................................7 2.2 Republican River Compact Litigation and Settlement.............................7 2.3 Settlement Provisions ...............................................................................8 2.4 Problems and Opportunities .....................................................................9 2.4.1 Existing Conditions..........................................................................9 2.4.2 Expected Future Conditions...........................................................10 2.4.3 Opportunities..................................................................................11 2.4.4 Problems Warranting Federal Participation...................................11 2.4.5 Planning Objectives and Planning Constraints ..............................12 2.4.5.1 Planning Objectives ...................................................12 2.4.5.2 Planning Constraints ..................................................12 Chapter 3 ─ Alternative Plans............................................................................13 3.1 Management Methods ............................................................................13 3.1.1 Winterize Superior-Courtland Diversion Dam and Courtland Canal .............................................................................13 3.1.2 Automate Superior-Courtland Diversion Dam and Courtland Canal .............................................................................13 3.1.3 Renovate Courtland Canal (Restore the Courtland Canal to Design Capacity)............................................................................14 3.1.4 Provide for Increased Conservation Storage in Lovewell Reservoir........................................................................14 i Lower Republican River Basin Appraisal Report ─ Nebraska and Kansas 3.2 River System Operation Model..............................................................16 3.3 Description of Baseline and Alternatives...............................................16 3.3.1 Alternative A ─ Courtland Canal to Design Capacity, Winterize .18 3.3.2 Alternative B ─ Automate, Winterize Courtland Canal ................18 3.3.3 Alternative C ─ Automate, Winterize, Courtland Canal to Design Capacity .............................................................................19 3.3.4 Alternative D ─ Automate, Winterize Courtland Canal; Raise Lovewell 16,000 ac-ft ..........................................................19 3.3.5 Alternative E ─ Automate, Winterize, Courtland Canal to Design Capacity; Raise Lovewell 16,000 ac-ft..............................19 3.3.6 Alternative F ─ Automate, Winterize Courtland Canal; Raise Lovewell 35,000 AF ............................................................19 3.3.7 Alternative G ─ Automate, Winterize, Courtland Canal to Design Capacity; Raise Lovewell 35,000 ac-ft..............................19 3.3.8 Alternative H ─ Raise Lovewell 16,000 ac-ft ...............................19 3.3.9 Alternative I ─ Courtland Canal to Design Capacity; Raise Lovewell 16,000 ac-ft ..........................................................19 3.3.10 Other Storage Alternatives..........................................................19 3.4 Evaluation of Alternatives......................................................................20 3.4.1 Hydrologic Evaluations .................................................................20 3.4.1.1 Changes of Water Supply into Lovewell Reservoir ....20 3.4.1.2 Minimum Desirable Streamflows Analysis .................20 3.4.1.3 Farm Delivery Changes ...............................................21 3.4.2 Alternative Design and Cost Estimates..........................................21 3.4.2.1 Canal Components .......................................................21 3.4.2.2 Components to Increase Storage Capacity in Lovewell Reservoir......................................................23 3.4.2.3 Other Storage Alternatives...........................................27 3.4.2.4 Recreation Mitigation ..................................................29 3.4.2.5 Cost Estimates..............................................................31 3.4.3 Economic Benefit Evaluation ........................................................35 3.4.3.1 Irrigation Benefit Estimation .......................................36 3.4.3.2 Evaluation of Recreation Benefits ...............................38 3.4.3.3 Benefit-Cost Analysis ..................................................42 ii Lower Republican River Basin Appraisal Report ─ Nebraska and Kansas 3.4.4 Environmental Evaluations .............................................................44 3.4.4.1 Alternatives A, B, and C: Alternatives That Only Involve the Diversion Dam and Canal.........................46 3.4.4.2 Alternatives D, E, H, and I: Alternatives That Also Involve Raising Lovewell 16,000 Ac-Ft......................46 3.4.4.3 Alternatives F and G: Alternatives That Also Involve Raising Lovewell 35,000 Ac-Ft...................................46 3.4.5 Socioeconomics ..............................................................................47 3.4.5.1 Overview...................................................................47 3.4.5.2 Agricultural Production and Value ............................47 3.4.6 Cultural Resources Evaluations .....................................................47 3.4.6.1 Alternatives A, B, and C: Alternatives That Only Involve the Diversion Dam and Canal.........................48 3.4.6.2 Alternatives D, E, F, G, H, and I: Alternatives That Also Involve Raising Lovewell Reservoir...................48 3.4.6.3 Other Storage Alternatives...........................................49 3.4.7 Legal and Institutional Evaluations ...............................................50 3.4.7.1 Legal ............................................................................50 3.4.7.2 Institutional ..................................................................55 3.4.8 Summary of the Evaluation of Alternatives...................................56 3.4.9 Uncertainties ..................................................................................57 Chapter 4 ─ Findings...........................................................................................61 4.1 Findings ..................................................................................................61 4.1.1 Recommendations..........................................................................61 4.2 Preliminary Plan of Study ─ Feasibility Study.......................................61 Appendices Appendix A Hydrology Report Appendix B Cost Estimate Worksheets Appendix C Recreation Mitigation Costs Appendix D Benefit Estimation Appendix E Recreation Analysis Appendix F Preliminary Plan of Study ─ Feasibility Study iii Lower Republican River Basin Appraisal Report ─ Nebraska and Kansas Figures Figure 1 Study Area .........................................................................................................3 Figure 2 Lovewell Reservoir Existing Allocations ........................................................14 Figure 3 Lovewell Reservoir Allocations for 16,000 ac-ft Enlargement .......................15 Figure 4 Lovewell Reservoir Allocations for 35,000 ac-ft Enlargement .......................15 Figure 5 Schematic Diagram of Lower Republic River Basin.......................................17 Tables Table 1 Summary of Model Runs .................................................................................18 Table 2 Average Discharge from Courtland Canal into Lovewell ...............................20 Table 3 Average Annual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables
    Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables Dated: July 10, 2008 Blue Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Carbondale East Lake, Fall River Toe Drain 5 fish daily creel limit Cheney Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Milford Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Blue Catfish Length Limits 35 inch minimum. Blue catfish of a length less than thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Cheney Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Channel Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Andover - Lake George, Arma City Lake, Atchison State Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City Lake, Bonner Springs - North Park Lake, Bourbon Co. Cedar Creek, Bourbon Co. Elm Creek Lake, Bourbon State Fishing Lake, Bronson City Lake, Brown State Fishing Lake, Butler State Fishing Lake, Carbondale East Lake, Chanute City Lake, Clinton State Park - Lake Henry, Clinton State Park - Picnic Area Pond, Columbus - VFW Pond, Colwich City Lake, Douglas State Fishing Lake, Emporia - Camp Alexander Ponds, Emporia - Jones Park Ponds, Emporia - Peter Pan Park, Fall River State Park Kids Pond, Fall River Toe Drain, Fort Scott - Gunn Park Lake Fern, Fort Scott - Gunn Park Lake West, Fort Scott - Lake Fort Scott, Fort Scott Community College Lakes, Frontenac City Lake, Gardner City Lake, Garnett City Lake North, Garnett City Lake South, Greenbush Community Lake, Gridley City Lake, Harvey Co. Camp Hawk, Haysville - Riggs Lake, Impounded F.I.S.H. Waters, Region 1 & 3, Johnson Co. - Kill Creek Park Lake, Johnson Co. - Shawnee Mission Park , Johnson Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2021
    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2021 Kansas Water Office September 2020 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Roger T1." Grange, Jr. a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The
    Ceramic relationships in the Central Plains Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Grange, Roger Tibbets, 1927- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 18:53:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565603 CERAMIC RELATIONSHIPS' IN THE CENTRAL PLAINS ^ > 0 ^ . Roger T1." Grange, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Roger T, Grange, Jr»________________________ entitled ______Ceramic Relationships in the Central_____ _____Plains_______________________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of _____Doctor of Philosophy________________________ April 26. 1962 Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* 5 / ? / ^ t 5 /? / C 2-— A / , - r y /n / *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • 1888 Handbook of Concordia
    HAND-BOOK )OF(- CONCORDIA AND cloUd county, Kansas CLOUD COUNTY COURT HOUSE, CONCORDIA orEazia^-G-o: C. S. BURCI-I PUBLISHING COMPANY. 1888. ms: r^i J. H. UDELL. E. E. SWEARNGIN. CLOUD COUNTY BANK, SWEARNGIN & UDELL CONCORDIA, KANSAS. REAL ESTATE, LOAN AND INSURANCE, CAPITAL, $100,000. SURPLUS, S^.ooo. Office In Iron Block, T. B. SMITH. PRESCDeNT. W. H. WRIGHT, Vice President. % STURGES, KENNETT £ PECK. Wm. M. PECK. Cashier. C 03STCOK.I3IA., KANSAS. O. B HARRISON, ASST. Cashier. '• Attorneys for the Flank. I*'.J. Atwood, President. G. V.. Latnkov, Cashier. HOWARD HILLIS, C. TC. Sweet, Vice President. W. \V. Bowman, Asst. Cashier. FIRST NATIONAL BANK, ATTORNEY AT LAW COA7CORDIA, KANSAS. CONCORDIA, KANSAS. CAPITAL, SIOO.OOO. SURPLUS, $25,000. Collections made for, and Information furnished to 30x :r,:ec;to:r.s - C. V.. Swekt, Gwi. W. Mahsiiam., Tiieh. I.ai.nt,, C. A. Hktoiknav Eastern Investors. K. J. Atwooii, D. \V. Simmons, Thomas \Vhon«i. W. W. Caldwell, President. J. \V. Pktkkshn, Cashier. L. N. HOUSTON, II. II. McEcKKON, Vice President. 1*. W. Moitr.AN, Asst. Cashier. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK, REAL ESTATE, LOAN and INSURANCE, CONCORDIA, KANSAS. CONCORDIA, KANSAS. CAPITAL, $100,000. SURPLUS, $7,500. DIRECTORS. J. \V. IV.tkkson, A. Nf.i-son, J. S. Siieak ku, It. H. McEckhon, W. \V. Caldwell, -Correspondence Solicited.- T. H. IlttKKNIAN, JOSKI-II 1'KKHIKK, J. A. KldUY, I). T. DuNN INt;. W. W. CALDWELL, J. W. PETERSON, President Cili/.ens National Rank. Cashier Citizens National Rank. Real Estate Agent and Loan Broker, CALDWELL & PETERSON, Negotiators of Loans. CONCORDIA, KANSAS. Ten vcars' experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Depletion Investigations in the Republican River Basin: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas
    J. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, Vol. 27(3) 251-263, 1999 STREAMFLOW DEPLETION INVESTIGATIONS IN THE REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN: COLORADO, NEBRASKA, AND KANSAS JOZSEF SZILAGYI University of Nebraska–Lincoln ABSTRACT Water is a critical resource in the Great Plains. This study examines the changes in long-term mean annual streamflow in the Republican River basin. In the past decades this basin, shared by three states, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas, displayed decreased streamflow volumes as the river enters Kansas across the Nebraska-Kansas border compared to values preceding the 1950s. A recent lawsuit filed by Kansas challenges water appropriations in Nebraska. More than half of the source area for this water, however, lies outside of Nebraska. Today a higher percentage of the annual flow is generated within Nebraska (i.e., 75% of the observed mean annual stream- flow at the NE-KS border) than before the 1950s (i.e., 66% of the observed mean annual streamflow) indicating annual streamflow has decreased more dramatically outside of Nebraska than within the state in the past fifty years. INTRODUCTION The Republican River basin’s 64,796 km2 drainage area is shared by three states: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas (see Figure 1). Nebraska has the largest single share of the drainage area, 25,154 km2 (39% of total); Colorado can claim about 20,000 km2 (31%), while the rest, about 19,583 km2 (30%), belongs to Kansas [1], from which about 12,800 km2 (20%) lies upstream of Hardy, near the Nebraska-Kansas border. Exact figures for the contributing drainage areas (portions of the drainage areas that actually contribute water to the stream) are hard to obtain because these areas in the headwater sections of the basin have been shrinking constantly in the past fifty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican River Valley and Adjacent Areas, Nebraska
    A, Economic Geology, 97 B, Descriptive Geology 119 M, General Hydrograpmc investigations, 26 (0, Underground Waters, 72 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES I>. WALOOTT, DIKECTOR GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLICAN RIVER VALLEY AND ADJACENT AREAS, NEBRASKA G. E. CONDRA -FERTY OF -LOGICAL Sl'». WASHINGTON (GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1907 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction __'___________________________________ 7 Geography _____________________________________ 8 Topography______________________.._ 8 Drainage _____________________________.____ 8 Climate "_________________________ _ _________ ._..__ 9 Temperature_______l_____________________ 9 Rainfall _____________________________________ 9 Winds_____________________________________ 10 Descriptive geology ________________________________ 10 General relations _____ _________ ___ ________ 10 Structure____________________________ 11 Description of the rocks____ ______________________ 11 Carboniferous system_______________________ 11 Cretaceous system.__________________________ 12 Dakota formation_________________________ 12 Character and thickness______________ 12 Distribution_________________ 13 Benton group________________________ 13 Members represented________________ 13 Graneros shale_ ________________________ 14 Character and thickness_________________ 14 Exposures,_________ _______ _-_________ 14 Greenhorn limestone_____________________ 14 Character and thickness___________________ 14 Fossils_________________________ 16 Carlile shale______.___________________
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas River Basin Model
    Kansas River Basin Model Edward Parker, P.E. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District KANSAS CITY DISTRICT NEBRASKA IOWA RATHBUN M I HARLAN COUNTY S S I LONG S S I SMITHVILLE BRANCH P TUTTLE P CREEK I URI PERRY SSO K MI ANS AS R I MILFORD R. V CLINTON E WILSON BLUE SPRINGS R POMONA LONGVIEW HARRY S. TRUMAN R COLO. KANOPOLIS MELVERN HILLSDALE IV ER Lake of the Ozarks STOCKTON KANSAS POMME DE TERRE MISSOURI US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Kansas River Basin Operation Challenges • Protect nesting Least Terns and Piping Plovers that have taken residence along the Kansas River. • Supply navigation water support for the Missouri River. • Reviewing requests from the State of Kansas and the USBR to alter the standard operation to improve support for recreation, irrigation, fish & wildlife. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model Requirements • Model Period 1/1/1920 through 12/31/2000 • Six-Hour routing period • Forecast local inflow using recession • Use historic pan evaporation – Monthly vary pan coefficient • Parallel and tandem operation • Consider all authorized puposes • Use current method of flood control US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model PMP Revisions • Model period from 1/1/1929 through 12/30/2001 • Mean daily flows for modeling rather than 6-hour data derived from mean daily flow values. • Delete the requirement to forecast future hydrologic conditions. • Average monthly lake evaporation rather than daily • Utilize a standard pan evaporation coefficient of 0.7 rather than a monthly varying value. • Separate the study basin between the Smoky River Basin and the Republican/Kansas River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Lovewell Spring Newsletter
    LOVEWELL STATE PARK SPRING NEWSLETTER March 2021 Welcome to this edition of the Lovewell State Park Spring Newsletter! We sincerely hope you enjoy it and will provide us feedback on the format and content. 2020 — A Record Year!! STATE PARK FEES FOR 2021 Annual Vehicle $25.00 With the outbreak of a global pandemic in Kansas SR/Disabled Annual $13.75 March of 2020, the Daily Vehicle $ 5.00 future of Kansas Kansas SR/Disabled Daily $ 3.25 State Parks was at first uncertain. But by Unconventional Vehicle Permit $52.50 mid-April, as visitors Annual Camp Permit $202.50 ($252.50 after March 31) began to see the state 14 Day Camp Permit $112.50 parks as a way to social distance and still get out of the house and make wonderful outdoor memories, the flood gates opened Daily Camp $ 10.00 and parks like Lovewell State Park were busier than ever before! Prime Site (all 50amp sites) $ 2.00 All primitive and utility campgrounds were full from late April Electricity $ 9.00 through the end of July, and nearly full for most of August. Many of the visitors were completely new to camping, fishing Elect/Water $11.00 and boating. This resulted in a record year for visitation and Elect/Water/Sewer $12.00 revenue for all of our Kansas State Parks. Catch phrases like the Seasonal Campsite Elect $371.50 per month “new normal” have become a reality. This is evidenced by the launch of our 2021 camping inventory this past December, Seasonal Campsite Elect/Water $431.50 per month which was DOUBLE that of the launch date in 2020! Therefore, Seasonal Campsite Elect/Water/Sewer $491.50 per month it is seemingly imperative to reserve your 2021 camping cabin or * Transaction Fee of $2.75 will be added to each campsite transaction TOTAL.
    [Show full text]
  • II. the Battle of Summit Springs
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: The Republican River Expedition, June-July 1869: II. The Battle of Summit Springs Full Citation: James T King, “The Republican River Expedition, June-July, 1869: II. The Battle of Summit Springs,” Nebraska History 41 (1960): 281-298 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH1960SummitSprings.pdf Date: 11/10/2011 Article Summary: The Republican River Expedition against the Cheyenne had to contend with elusive enemies, false alarms and weary troops. Despite all these obstacles the expedition ultimately changed the Republican Valley from an Indian-held wilderness to a region ready for settlement. Cataloging Information: Names: Frank North, EA Carr, Tall Bull, Maria Weichell, Susanna Alderdice Place Names: Julesburg, Nebraska; Fort Sedgewick, Colorado Territory Keywords: Frank North, Pawnee Scouts, EA Carr, Cheyenne, Dog Soldiers, Tall Bull, Maria Weichell, Susanna Alderdice Photographs / Images: map of Republican River Expedition sites, Pawnee Scouts, Luther H North at site of battle (1933) " " ~ ~ ~ " " " ~ ----- .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 45/Thursday, March 6, 2008/Notices
    12212 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Notices known individual was identified. No Nebraska State Historical Society and Box 1286, Hastings, NE 68902, associated funerary objects are present. museum records are consistent with telephone (402) 461–2399, before April Research conducted at the Nebraska information on the site known as the 7, 2008. Repatriation of the human State Historical Society identifies at Hanna Larson Site. The site was remains and associated funerary objects least 15 sites in the area around Palmer. occupied form A.D. 1650 to A.D. 1750 to the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma may One site is known as the Palmer Village and is culturally identified with the proceed after that date if no additional (25HW1), which is a well known site Lower Loup Focus of the Pahuk Aspect claimants come forward. that was occupied by the Skidi band of of the late Ceramic Period. The Hastings Museum is responsible the Pawnee from at least A.D. 1804 to The Lower Loup Phase sites are for notifying the Crow Tribe of Montana; A.D. 1836, and was observed and located in areas also associated with Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe– recorded by a number of explorers to the historic Pawnee sites. The Lower Loup Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; area. Museum officials have been able to material culture suggests that they are Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma; Ponca document Mr. Brooking and Mr. Hill as ancestors of the Pawnee. Descendants of Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca having conducted excavations at the the Pawnee are members of the Pawnee Tribe of Nebraska; Sac & Fox Nation of Palmer Village.
    [Show full text]
  • 58Th Annual Report
    REPUBLICAN RIVER COMPACT ADMINISTRATION 58TH ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2018 COLBY, KANSAS AUGUST 22, 2019 Table of Contents Special Meeting of the RRCA – November 6, 2018 3 Summary and Minutes of the Special Meeting 4 Exhibit A: Attendance 8 Exhibit B: Agenda 9 Exhibit C: First Amendment to Resolution by the Republican River Compact Administration Approving Operation and Accounting for the Colorado Compact Compliance Pipeline and Colorado’s Compliance Efforts in the South Fork Republican River Basin 10 Annual Meeting of the RRCA – August 22, 2019 12 Summary and Minutes of the Annual Meeting 13 Exhibit A: Transcript 21 Exhibit B: Attendance 90 Exhibit C: Agenda 94 Exhibit D: Nebraska Water Report 95 Exhibit E: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Report 97 Exhibit F: U.S. Geological Survey Report 106 Exhibit G: Engineering Committee Report 116 RRCA Approval of the 59th Annual Report 161 REPUBLICAN RIVER COMPACT ADMINISTRATION Special Meeting November 6, 2018 Discussion of Operation and Accounting for the Colorado Compact Compliance Pipeline and Colorado’s Compliance Efforts in the South Fork Republican Basin 3 SUMMARY AND MINUTES OF THE 2018 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE REPUBLICAN RIVER COMPACT ADMINISTRATION NOVEMBER 6, 2018 HELD AT THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BROOMFIELD, COLORADO Summary The following summary of the special meeting was prepared utilizing a recording of the meeting. Agenda Item 1: Introductions The special meeting of the Republican River Compact Administration (RRCA) was called to order by Kansas Commissioner and Chairman David Barfield at 9:05 a.m. MST, November 6, 2018. Commissioner Barfield asked for introductions around the room and on the phone.
    [Show full text]