Evaluating New Orleans and Baton Rouge Rail Terminals and Transit Links
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rails to Resilience: Evaluating New Orleans and Baton Rouge Rail Terminals and Transit Links Project No. 19PPLSU11 Lead University: University of New Orleans Final Report November 2020 Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated in the interest of information exchange. The report is funded, partially or entirely, by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program. However, the U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. Acknowledgements The research team recognizes the assistance of the Project Review Committee in guiding development of this study and providing valuable data and feedback: Karen Parsons, Principal Planner, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission Laura Phillips, Transportation Planner, FHWA LA Division Jason Sappington, Deputy Director, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission Susanna Schowen, Workforce Initiatives Manager, Louisiana Economic Development Dr. Li Zhang, Associate Professor, Mississippi State University i TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Project No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 19PPLSU11 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date November 2020 Rails to Resilience: Evaluating New Orleans and Baton Rouge Rail 6. Performing Organization Code Terminals and Transit Links 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. PI: Tara M. Tolford https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-7590 Co-PI: James Amdal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-5414 Addl. Staff: Guang Tian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4023-3912 GRA: Alahna Moore https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-7020 GRA: Marin Tockman https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-9094 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Transportation Consortium of South-Central States (Tran-SET) University Transportation Center for Region 6 11. Contract or Grant No. 3319 Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 69A3551747106 LA 70803 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered United States of America Final Research Report Sep. 2019 – Nov. 2020 Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Report uploaded and accessible at Tran-SET's website (http://transet.lsu.edu/). 16. Abstract This study evaluates the multimodal linkages to and opportunities for proposed terminal sites for a potential future passenger rail connection between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana. The project included a comprehensive analysis of recent planning processes and documents and distribution of a statewide survey aimed at understanding ridership potential (including non-work trips) and the needs of likely users, the results of which were modeled to illuminate key considerations for service design and station area planning. This study finds a strong foundation for, and support of, the proposed rail service, but distinct deficiencies in the current multimodal transportation environment connecting to and from proposed stations. In addition, previous analyses include potentially faulty assumptions about likely rail passenger trip purposes, which have critical implications for service design. The findings of this study reflect the priorities of likely rail passengers and advance efforts to plan for successful passenger rail service operation in Southeast Louisiana. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Transit, land use, planning, passenger rail, active No restrictions. This document is available through the transportation, COVID-19, bicycling, walking, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 207 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized. ii SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find Symbol LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km AREA in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m 3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 megagrams (or "metric ton") Mg (or "t") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) oF Fahrenheit 5 (F-32)/9 Celsius oC or (F-32)/1.8 ILLUMINATION fc foot-candles 10.76 lux lx fl foot-Lamberts 3.426 candela/m2 cd/m2 FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS lbf poundforce 4.45 newtons N lbf/in2 poundforce per square inch 6.89 kilopascals kPa APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find Symbol LENGTH mm millimeters 0.039 inches in m meters 3.28 feet ft m meters 1.09 yards yd km kilometers 0.621 miles mi AREA mm2 square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in2 m square meters 10.764 square feet ft2 m square meters 1.195 square yards yd2 ha hectares 2.47 acres ac km square kilometers 0.386 square miles mi2 VOLUME mL milliliters 0.034 fluid ounces fl oz L liters 0.264 gallons gal m cubic meters 35.314 cubic feet ft3 m cubic meters 1.307 cubic yards yd3 MASS g grams 0.035 ounces oz kg kilograms 2.202 pounds lb Mg (or "t") megagrams (or "metric ton") 1.103 short tons (2000 lb) T TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) C Celsius 1.8C+32 Fahrenheit oF ILLUMINATION lx lux 0.0929 foot-candles fc cd/m2 candela/m2 0.2919 foot-Lamberts fl FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS N newtons 0.225 poundforce lbf kPa kilopascals 0.145 poundforce per square inch lbf/in2 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION PAGE .................................................................................. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ xii ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS .............................................................. xiv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ xvii 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 19 2. OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 20 3. LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................................... 21 3.1. Development of new intercity and commuter transit services ........................................... 21 3.2. Multimodal planning for intercity transit ........................................................................... 24 3.3. Case Studies ....................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1. South Florida Brightline ............................................................................................. 26 3.3.2. North Carolina Piedmont ............................................................................................ 27 3.3.3. Hoosier State Train ..................................................................................................... 28 3.4. Evaluating projected ridership and demand ....................................................................... 28 4. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 32 4.1. Project Review Committee ................................................................................................ 32 4.2. Synthesize Existing Data ................................................................................................... 32 4.3. Identify transit route and terminal evaluation priorities and performance metrics ............ 33 4.4. Data Collection Plan .......................................................................................................... 33 4.4.1. Data Needs .................................................................................................................. 33 4.4.2. Key Performance Metrics ........................................................................................... 34 4.4.3. Survey Distribution Strategy ....................................................................................... 35 4.5. Data Collection .................................................................................................................. 36 4.6. Analyze Data ...................................................................................................................... 36 4.6.1. Existing Conditions Analysis ...................................................................................... 37 4.6.2. Survey data cleaning and processing .........................................................................