Physical Drivers of the Summer 2019 North Pacific Marine Heatwave
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title Physical drivers of the summer 2019 North Pacific marine heatwave. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2jm2n24t Journal Nature communications, 11(1) ISSN 2041-1723 Authors Amaya, Dillon J Miller, Arthur J Xie, Shang-Ping et al. Publication Date 2020-04-20 DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15820-w Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15820-w OPEN Physical drivers of the summer 2019 North Pacific marine heatwave ✉ Dillon J. Amaya 1,2 , Arthur J. Miller3, Shang-Ping Xie 3 & Yu Kosaka 4 Summer 2019 observations show a rapid resurgence of the Blob-like warm sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies that produced devastating marine impacts in the Northeast Pacific during winter 2013/2014. Unlike the original Blob, Blob 2.0 peaked in the summer, a 1234567890():,; season when little is known about the physical drivers of such events. We show that Blob 2.0 primarily results from a prolonged weakening of the North Pacific High-Pressure System. This reduces surface winds and decreases evaporative cooling and wind-driven upper ocean mixing. Warmer ocean conditions then reduce low-cloud fraction, reinforcing the marine heatwave through a positive low-cloud feedback. Using an atmospheric model forced with observed SSTs, we also find that remote SST forcing from the central equatorial and, sur- prisingly, the subtropical North Pacific Ocean contribute to the weakened North Pacific High. Our multi-faceted analysis sheds light on the physical drivers governing the intensity and longevity of summertime North Pacific marine heatwaves. 1 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. 2 Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. 3 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. ✉ 4 Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. email: [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2020) 11:1903 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15820-w | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15820-w n winter 2013/2014 upper ocean temperatures in the North- the winter and was the result of a resilient atmospheric ridge in Ieast Pacific were remarkably warm over a large area, with peak the Northeast Pacific, which weakened the climatological Aleu- values near 2.5 °C or three standard deviations above normal. tian Low and related surface winds. The reduced wind forcing The extraordinary magnitude and persistence of these anomalies decreased Ekman advection of cold water from higher latitudes posed a significant threat to regional marine ecosystems1, earning and reduced wind-generated upper ocean mixing, which allowed this pattern the moniker The Blob in the scientific literature and surface heat fluxes to significantly warm the upper ocean2. media2. Over the subsequent months, The Blob anomalies spread While stalled atmospheric high-pressure systems have been along the western North American coastline as the result of linked to the development of other wintertime marine heat- shifting atmospheric forcing, generating significant coastal waves10, it is not clear that this is a viable forcing mechanism in warming and unprecedented marine impacts during the summer the summer when the mean circulation itself is dominated by a of 2014 and into winter 2014/20153–5. As a result, the 2013–2015 ridge—the North Pacific High. For example, an anomalous North Pacific warm anomalies have since generated significant summertime atmospheric ridge would tend to strengthen the scientific interest into the origin, persistence, probability, and background mean circulation (i.e., the surface westerlies) when intensification of so-called marine heatwaves4–10. superposed on the climatological North Pacific High. This would Half a decade later, upper ocean temperatures near the Gulf of increase surface evaporation and wind-generated upper ocean Alaska have risen to unprecedented levels (Fig. 1), leading to mixing. As a result, we might actually expect a series of anom- significant public concern that The Blob and its devastating alous summertime ridging events to cool the Northeast impacts have once again returned. However, an important dis- Pacific Ocean. tinction between the recent temperature anomalies (hereafter In addition, studies have shown that the remarkable persistence referred to as Blob 2.0) and 2013/2014 temperature anomalies of the winter 2013/2014 Northeast Pacific ridge was partly the (hereafter referred to as Blob 1.0) is that Blob 2.0 has primarily result of remote sea surface temperature (SST) forcing through intensified during the summer season. The Blob 1.0 originated in atmospheric teleconnections4,8,11,12. There has been considerable research on SST-forced teleconnections to the North Pacific during boreal winter when important climate modes like the El a 60 Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) tend to peak13,14, but there has been comparably less work on the influence of remote SST on North Pacific ocean-atmospheric variability during the summer15,16. Further, while local air–sea feedbacks were not 50 thought to be an important sustaining mechanism for Blob 1.0, they may be a significant driver of the Blob 2.0 due to the per- vasiveness of marine stratocumulus clouds during boreal sum- mer. An analysis of the physical mechanisms behind Blob 2.0 and 40 the extent to which remote and/or local SST forcing may be playing a role would improve our understanding of the devel- opment, evolution, and persistence of summertime marine 30 heatwaves in this region. In this study, we use gridded reanalysis products combined with satellite-derived observations to investigate the physical drivers that led to the rapid intensification of the summer 2019 20 Northeast Pacific SST anomalies. We find that Blob 2.0 primarily 180 195 210 225 240 results from an anomalous weakening of the North Pacific High, which significantly reduces wind-driven upper ocean mixing, –2.5 –2 –1.5 –1 –0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 producing a record shallow mixed layer depth. As a result, strong °C downward surface heat fluxes mixed over an anomalously thin mixed layer volume, resulting in record warming for this region. b We then use a suite of SST-forced atmospheric model simulations 3 to conduct a near real-time attribution analysis of the North Pacific atmospheric circulation anomalies. We show that, while 2 the magnitude of North Pacific High weakening primarily results from internal atmospheric variability, the circulation anomalies 1 are reinforced in time and space by atmospheric teleconnections SSTA 0 originating from both the tropics and, surprisingly, the sub- tropical North Pacific. In addition, we present satellite and model –1 evidence that surface warming associated with Blob 2.0 sig- –2 nificantly reduce low-cloud fraction in the North Pacific, sug- – 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 gesting an important role for local air sea feedbacks in amplifying/sustaining the summer 2019 marine heatwave. Year Fig. 1 The Blob 2.0 in an ocean reanalysis product. a Five-meter ocean temperature anomalies (°C) averaged for June–August (JJA) 2019 in Results Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS). b Time series of Drivers of Blob 2.0 in observational analyses. To investigate the normalized monthly mean sea surface temperature anomalies area- driving mechanisms behind Blob 2.0, we begin by inspecting weighted averaged in black box above, smoothed with a 3-month running June–August (JJA) 2019 averaged SSTAs in the North Pacific mean for the period 1980–2019. Red dot marks JJA 2019. Green dots mark (Fig. 1a). Similar to 2013/2014, ocean reanalysis data sets show a the two peaks of Blob 1.0 averaged in January–March 2014 and May–July Blob of anomalous ocean warming off the United States west 2015, respectively. coast, with a peak magnitude of over 2.5 °C at the center 2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2020) 11:1903 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15820-w | www.nature.com/naturecommunications NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15820-w ARTICLE a 60 a 15 1008 10 40 1016 1024 1020 1008 5 20 1012 0 Heat budget (°C) 0 1012 Δ –5 T Qnet Advection 120 180 240 300 Residual –5 –4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5 b 525 30 hPa ) –3 Mixed layer depth (m) s 3 450 25 b –3 3 –2 2 375 20 –1 1 SSTA 0 0 300 15 1 –1 Wind speed cubed (m 225 10 N. Pac. High Intensity Pac. N. 2 –2 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 3 –3 Fig. 3 Mixed layer heat budget estimated in ocean reanalysis. a August 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 minus May temperature change (°C; blue) and the respective budget terms Fig. 2 Atmospheric circulation anomalies during summer 2019. a contributing to this change. Budget terms include total surface heat flux Detrended sea level pressure anomalies (SLPAs; hPa; shading) from (red), horizontal advection (brown), and entrainment/residual (gray). atmospheric reanalysis averaged June–August (JJA) 2019 (shading and thin b June–August (JJA)-averaged reanalysis wind speed cubed (green/left y- − contours). Heavy dark contours represent JJA SLP climatology. Red axis; m3 s 3) and mixed layer depth (purple/right y-axis; m) area-weighted contours are sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs) from Fig. 1a averaged in black box seen in Fig. 1a. All time series are for the time period (starting at 1 °C with 0.5 °C interval). Black box represents area of 1980–2019. comparison for Best Member results in Fig. 5d–f. b Time series of the North Pacific High Intensity index (gray/left y-axis; hPa; negative = weaker; see “Methods”) and normalized JJA SSTA area-weighted averaged in the black detrended, both 95% significant) suggests that a weakened mean box shown in Fig.