AP European History Absolutism in Eastern Europe M. Holloway Page 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AP European History Absolutism in Eastern Europe M. Holloway Page 1 AP European History Absolutism in Eastern Europe M. Holloway Absolutism in Eastern Europe Holy Roman Empire Compare Western Europe with Eastern Europe Roughly 300 states 17th Century - West Austria is the largest Most countries had: Emperor selected by 7 Electors… after 1648 there Strong central govt were 8 Electors Nobility tamed or incorporated into the state German princes gradually go their own way Urban merchant classes on the rise Treaty of Westphalia (1648) allow for member Agricultural population free from feudal obligations states to conduct their own foreign policy Central & Eastern Europe Imperial courts powerless Nobility has considerable power and status Habsburgs - Austria Middle class weak Tried to consolidate HRE during Thirty Years Peasants still enserfed War… 1618-48 How does it happen? Lost – forced to turn inward and Eastward Economics from 1300-1500 HRE included 15 major languages Tough econ times in West… leads to more freedoms of Habsburgs are only power able to exercise its Peasants influence in both West and East (back in Charles V Serf obligations gradually declined days) In eastern Europe landlords used political and police Habsburg King – Ferdinand II power to control peasants Formerly known as Ferdinand of Styria Eastern Europe Control He ruled from 1619-1637 1. Lords made kings and princes issue laws to restrict or Although Defenestration of Prague launches his eliminate free movement of peasants (ear nailed… given Catholic administrators out the window… he wins knife) the bigger conflict 2. Lords took more of their lands and increased their Habsburg King – Ferdinand II labor obligations Bohemia crushed into submission Peasants become enserfed again! Peasants further oppressed Protestantism stamped out Economic factors or Political? Bohemian nobles forced to submit – they like Economic factors would have to somehow account for Habsburg monarch for new measures placed on opposite effects in East and West serfs: TAXES, work (peasants worked Namely, West – freedom of serfs, 3 days/week for no pay for new masters) East – peasants are re-enserfed Ferdinand III (r. 1637-1657) Therefore, likely to be Political Centralized gov in German-speaking provinces… WEST – monarchs become stronger mostly Austria, Styria, and Tyrol EAST – monarchs = first among equals in noble class… Creation of permanent standing army thought their role to be more private than public Peace of Westphalia 1648 Leopold I (r. 1658-1705) Political Power of Peasants Hungary–Habsburgs continue to look east… Weakened in East Try to dominate… never successful until later Resistance minimal Yet, Hungarian nobles present stronger resistance Uprisings never succeeded than Bohemian/Czech nobility Lords ran the courts… not Kings Hungarian/Magyar nobles - Protestant Towns robbed of their merchant status in Middle Ages… Leopold promises Hungarian Estates restoration of Landlords undermined by selling/trading directly with some landowner privileges that had been suppressed big foreign capitalists Hungary ends up calling for Turkish assistance Foreign merchants bypassed towns to get to large estate Louis XIV allies himself with Turkish/Ottoman push docks, etc. Eastward… the Turks Absolutism on the Rise Turks attempt siege of Vienna in 1683… finally fails th In 17 century – things begin to change Eventually Habsburgs win BIG Continued wartime emergencies provide monarchs with By 1699 – Habsburgs have all of Hungary and “opportunity” Transylvania… Nobles can have domain over peasants… while But, again, Hungarian nobles will never completely monarchs gradually monopolize power submit to Habsburg rule – 1. Monarchs begin to impose and collect permanent Peace of Karlowitz (1699) – Ottomans yield taxes without consent territories to Austria and Poland – 2. Maintained permanent standing armies – 3. Conducted relations with other states as they pleased Page 1 AP European History Absolutism in Eastern Europe M. Holloway Habsburg Empire Estates of Brandenburg and Prussia dominated by Three separate and distinct territories: nobility and landowning classes – known as Austria “Junkers” Bohemia (Czech) Eventually gets Junkers Hungary to accept his plan Each with own laws and political system – tied together Soldiers collect taxes by common Habsburg monarch Tax revenues triple Joseph I (r. 1705-1711) Army increases 10x Charles VI (r. 1711-1740) Elector Frederick III – “The Ostentatious” In 1700 he was designated successor to throne in Spain Rules 1688-1713 (after Spanish King Charles II died – who was childless) Becomes King Frederick I (Prussia) in 1701 for helping BUT, on Charles II deathbed – switched to Philip of Leopold I and HRE in War of Spanish Succession Anjou (grandson of Louis XIV) Frederick William I (r. 1713-1740) The “Soldier’s King” or the “Sergeant-Major” Charles VI (r. 1711-1740) Could not count to 10 as a boy without tutor France is eventually defeated in War of Spanish Bad tempered Succession (1701-1713)… ends with Peace of Utrecht – Wore uniform around the house 1713 Known for fits of screaming rage By 1718 – Charles adds Wallachia (Romania), Serbia Called everyone in sight “blockhead” and Bosnia to Hungarian territories (from Ottomans) Beat officials with a stick Signs Pragmatic Sanction in 1713 to keep Habsburg Knocked out the teeth of several judges whose sentences possessions from being divided (passed to single heir) displeased him Allows for female heir – Marie Theresa Truly establishes absolute rule in Prussia Hungarian Resistance Began hiring commoners to run bureaucracy Protestantism kept them unified “Tall soldiers = his weakness” Liked Ottomans for their religious tolerance Battalion of Giants During War of Spanish Succession – Hungarians rise in Junkers become the Officers in Army one last patriotic rebellion Child Abuser? Prince Francis Rakocy – 1703 Known to constantly ridicule and beat his son Although defeated Hungary able to keep strong Frederick II – (r. 1740-1786) independent nature… Will become “Frederick the Great” Noble privileges kept… in exchange for Habsburg rule Tried to run away at 18… friend is beheaded acceptance The Rise of Prussia Russia The Hohenzollern family Ivan III – (r. 1462-1505) Brandenburg = “the sandbox of the Holy Roman Last of the Muscovy princes and first ruler of greater Empire” Russia Landlocked (around Berlin)… poor land/soil, no military Takes title of Tsar strength… Dumps khan as supreme leader Yet, the future seemed oddly bright? Secures Novgorod – confiscates property Prussia – a related territory, but geographically not Adopts double-headed eagle of Byzantium as imperial connected… reverted back to Brandenburg in 1618 crest Brandenburg/Hohenzollern family could do nothing “Third Rome” after fall of Constantinople in 1453 to throughout the Thirty Years War Turks Totally devastated… but also weakened Estates’ (noble Ivan marries daughter of the last Byzantine emperor families) strength… perfect for absolute power before the Turks conquer them Boyars – landed aristocracy… Georg Wilhelm (r. 1619-1640) gradually lose power during Ivan III and Ivan IV… Described by one of his descendents as “utterly unfit to abolished by Peter the Great rule” Ivan IV (r. 1533-1584) – THE TERRIBLE Known for his piety and gluttony…. Ivan Groznyi (“awe inspiring” – “terrible”) Spent most of the war switching from one side to the Mother poisoned by Boyars other. When Ivan was 13, he ordered a noble ripped By 1638…revenues fallen off by 90% apart by fierce dogs Had archbishop sewn into bearskin and thrown Enter Frederick William (r. 1640-1688) to hungry wolves Becomes known as the “Great Elector” Reforms army, legal system, expands trade, conquers East – Siberia Page 2 AP European History Absolutism in Eastern Europe M. Holloway Boyars – all, old and new, had to serve tsar to hold any land Fyodor’s brother-in-law ruled… After 1560… Death of 1st wife made him unstable Sort of… Ivan’s wives False Dmitri I and II 1547 – at age of 16... married: Supported by Poland… not trusted by Russians 1. Anastasia Romanova – good marriage. She bore Michael Romanov (r. 1613-1645) six children, although only two survived infancy. She Ivan the Terrible’s 16-year-old nephew dies in 1560. Very dedicated to nobility who secured his position Landlords continue push to enserf the peasants Two weeks after her death he announces that he’ll wed a Completely enserfed by 1649 sister of the king of Poland, Sigismund II Augustus. The Tsar’s power is thus, solidified offer is rejected by the Polish family. So he marries: Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov 2. Maria - Asiatic beauty... the daughter of the Ruled 1645-1676 Circassian ruler Temgruk. One child, boy, dies after 5 Law Code – 1649 weeks. Ivan loses interest in her... shortly thereafter Peasants enserfed she dies... (poison?) Annex Ukraine Revolt of Stephen Razin 3. Marfa – married to her just 16 days... some say Zealots of Piety never consummated?... she dies on 16th day (poison?) Nobility exempted from military service Two months later... Nikon and Russian Orthodox Church 4. Anna – a commoner (Church disapproves)... Wanted to eliminate corrupted practices and bring closer married 3 years... barren... sent to nunnery to Greek Orthodox Commoners saw him as the “Antichrist” Wives #5 and #6 – seen as mistresses in eyes of Old Believers –vs.- new reformed Rus Orthodox Church... Old Believers supported violent peasant uprisings Nikon defeats this Schism Then in 1580... Stephan (Stenka) Razin 7. Maria
Recommended publications
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Świat Materii W Testamentach Szlachty Czeskiej I Polskiej Z XVII Wieku
    KWARTALNIK HISTORII KULTURY MATERIALNEJ 67 (4), 2019 PL ISSN 0023-5881 www.iaepan.edu.pl DOI: 10.23858/KHKM67.2019.4.004 Andrzej Klonder Świat materii w testamentach szlachty czeskiej i polskiej z XVII wieku Słowa kluczowe: Polska, Czechy, szlachta, testament, wiek XVII Key words: Poland, Bohemia, nobility, testament, 17th century I. Wstęp. II. Edycje testamentów. 1. Szlachta polska. 2. Szlachta czeska. III. Prawo o zawartości testamentów (przepisy, porady, wzorce). IV. Ruchomości w testamentach z Korony Polskiej. 1. Charakter informacji. O czym milczą i mówią testamenty. 2. Rzeczy luksusowe. V. Ruchomości w testamentach z Czech. 1. Charakter informacji. 2. Rzeczy luksusowe. VI. Zakończenie I. Wstęp Poglądy historiografii polskiej i krajów ościennych (Czech, krajów języka niemieckiego) na rolę testamentu jako źródła poznania dawnej kultury materialnej od dawna są zróżnicowane i stale ewoluują. Na progu wieku XX klasyk polskiej historii prawa, Przemysław Dąbkowski, określił testament za Jakubem Haurem, szlacheckim pisarzem z drugiej połowy XVII w. jako „prawie zwierciadło człowieka żywego”1. Doceniając źródłowe znaczenie testamentu nie wni- kał jednak głębiej w szczegóły majątkowych dyspozycji testatorów. Wskazał jedynie, że do ruchomości, którymi swobodnie dysponowali, należały pieniądze, zwierzęta, a nawet niektóre „budowania”2. Z czasem historycy zaczęli poświęcać więcej uwagi rzeczom notowanym w tych dokumentach. Przed laty bez mała trzydziestu Maciej Gołembiowski, historyk i archiwista to- ruński, charakteryzując testament jako źródło, przypisywał mu wielką wszechstronność. Pod- kreślał, że — zwłaszcza analizowane w większej liczbie — akty ostatniej woli „wydają się kopalnią wiedzy o zbiorowościach ludzkich w przeszłości i to zarówno o ich duchowości, jak i ż yciu materialnym” [podkr. — A.K.]3. Już w obecnym stuleciu wydawcy jednego z cenniejszych wyborów staropolskich testamentów, we wstępie do tej edycji, w kilkunastu punktach przedstawili dziedziny życia, o których informują testamenty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Czechs and the Lands of the Bohemian Crown
    6 Rebellion and Catastrophe The Thirty Years’ War was the last great religious war in Europe, and the first Europe-wide conflict of balance-of-power politics. Beginning with the Bohemian rebellion in 1618, the war grew into a confrontation between the German Protestant princes and the Holy Roman Emperor, and finally became a contest between France and the Habsburgs’ two dynastic monarchies, involving practically all other powers. The war may be divided into four phases: the Bohemian-Palatinate War (1618– 23), the Danish War (1625–29), the Swedish War (1630–35), and the Franco-Swedish War (1635–48). When the war finally ended with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, the treaties set the groundwork for the system of international relations still in effect today. The outcome of the war integrated the Bohemian crownlands more fully with the other Habsburg possessions in a family empire that aspired to maintain its position as one of the powers in the international state system. This aspiration involved recurrent conflicts, on one side with the Turks, and on the other with Louis XIV’s France. .......................... 10888$ $CH6 08-05-04 15:18:33 PS PAGE 68 Rebellion and Catastrophe 69 VAE VICTIS!: THE BOHEMIAN CROWNLANDS IN THE THIRTY YEARS’ WAR After the Battle of the White Mountain and Frederick’s flight from Prague (his brief reign earned him the epithet ‘‘The Winter King’’), the last garrisons loyal to the Estates in southern and western Bohemia surrendered in May 1622. Even before these victories Ferdinand II began to settle accounts with his Bohemian opponents.
    [Show full text]
  • World Civ Chapter 21.Pdf
    436 Seeking new land and new markets, European explorers sailed around the world. This painting by Theodore Gudin depicts French explorer La Salle’s Louisiana expedition of 1684. Methods of Government In Unit 4, you will learn about different methods of ruling a nation or empire. At the end of the unit, you will have a chance to compare and contrast the governments you have studied. (See pages 578–583.) 437 Absolute Monarchs in Europe, 1500–1800 Previewing Main Ideas POWER AND AUTHORITY As feudalism declined, stronger national kingdoms in Spain, France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia emerged under the control of absolute rulers. Geography Study the map. What large empire was surrounded by many of these national kingdoms? ECONOMICS Absolute rulers wanted to control their countries’ economies so that they could free themselves from limitations imposed by the nobility. In France, Louis XIV’s unrestrained spending left his country with huge debts. Geography What other evidence of unrestrained spending by an absolute ruler does the time line suggest? REVOLUTION In Great Britain, Parliament and the British people challenged the monarch’s authority. The overthrow of the king led to important political changes. Geography Study the map and the time line. Which British Stuart lands were most affected by the event occurring in 1649? INTERNET RESOURCES • Interactive Maps Go to classzone.com for: • Interactive Visuals • Research Links • Maps • Interactive Primary Sources • Internet Activities • Test Practice • Primary Sources • Current Events • Chapter Quiz 586 587 What are the benefits and drawbacks of having an absolute ruler? You live under the most powerful monarch in 17th-century Europe, Louis XIV of France, shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • The Czech Nobility's Use of the Right of Patronage on Behalf of the Hussite Reform Movement
    JOHN M. KLASSEN The Czech Nobility's Use of the Right of Patronage on Behalf of the Hussite Reform Movement Throughout European history the aristocracy has been involved in reform movements which undermined either ecclesiastical or monarchical power struc­ tures. Thus the nobles of southern France in the twelfth century granted protection to the Cathars, and in fourteenth-century England lords and knights offered aid to the Lollards. The support of German princes and knights for Lutheranism is well known, as is the instrumental role played by the French aristocracy in initiating the constitutional reforms which gave birth to that nation's eighteenth-century revolution. The fifteenth-century Hus­ site reform movement in Bohemia similarly received aid from the noble class. Here, when the Hussites were under attack in 1417 from the authorities, espe­ cially the archbishop, sympathetic lords protected Hussite priests on their domains. At the beginning of the fifteenth century three intellectual tendencies coalesced at the University of Prague, giving the Czech reform movement its basic character for the next fifteen to twenty years. The oldest was the re­ ligious pietism to which men like Matthew of Janov and Thomas of Stitny had given expression. In their quest for a renewed spiritual life they invited believers to participate personally and directly in religion, and called on the clergy to give up their lives of pleasure and wealth. At the same time there developed a Czech consciousness among the reformers as it became apparent that those interested in religious renewal were mostly Czech speaking, while their opponents, who held many of the coveted and important church and university offices, were foreigners.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic Today
    Rich in History 1 2 Magic Crossroads Whenever European nations were set in motion, they met in a rather small area called the Czech Republic today. Since the early Middle Ages, this area was crossed by long trade routes from the severe North to the sunny South; at the beginning of the first millennium, Christianity emerged from the West, and at its end communism arrived from the East. For six hundred years, the country was an independent Czech kingdom, for three hundred years, it belonged among Austro-Hungarian Empire lands, and since 1918 it has been a republic. In the 14th century, under the Bohemian and German King and Roman Emperor Charles IV, as well as in the 16th century under the Emperor Rudolf II, the country enjoyed a favourable position in European history and also played a great role internationally in the arts and in social affairs. In 1989, the whole world admired the Czechoslovak “velvet revolution” lead by charismatic dramatist Václav Havel, which put an end to socialist experimentation. Numerous famous architects, who built Romanesque churches in Germany but were no longer commissioned to build in their home countries due to the coming Gothic period, succeeded there; at the same time, the French type of Gothic architecture took root in Bohemia. A number of Italian Renaissance or Baroque architects, painters and sculptors, who crossed the Alps to find new opportunity for creating master works and look for well-paid jobs, were hired by members of Czech nobility and clergy; astonished by the mastery of Czech builders and craftsmen with whom they cooperated, they created wonderful castles and breathtaking Catholic churches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanics of Modernity in Europe and East Asia
    The Mechanics of Modernity in Europe and East Asia This book provides a new answer to the old question of the 'rise of the west.' Why, from the eighteenth century onwards, did some countries embark on a path of sustained economic growth while others stagnated? For instance, Euro­ pean powers such as Great Britain and Germany emerged, whilst the likes of China failed to fulfil their potential. Ringmar concludes that, for sustained development to be possible, change must be institutionalised. The implications of this are brought to bear on issues facing the developing world today - with particular emphasis on Asia. Erik Ringmar teaches in the government department at the London School of Economics. He is the author of How We Survived Capitalism and Remained Almost Human (Anthem Books, 2005). Routledge explorations in economic history 1 Economic Ideas and Government Policy Contributions to contemporary economic history Sir Alec Caimcross 2 The Organization of Labour Markets Moderniry, culture and governance in Germany, Sweden, Britain and Japan Bo Strath 3 Currency Convertibility The gold standard and beyond Edited by Jorge Braga de Macedo, Barry Eichengreen and Jaime Reis 4 Britain's Place in the World A historical enquiry into import controls 1945-1960 Alan S. Milward and George Brennan 5 France and the International Economy From Vichy to the Treaty of Rome Frances M. B. Lynch 6 Monetary Standards and Exchange Rates M. C. Marcuzzo, L. Officer and A. Rosselli 7 Production Efficiency in Domesday England, 1086 John McDonal.d 8 Free Trade and its Reception 1815-1960 Freedom and trade: volume I Edited by Andrew Marrison 9 Conceiving Companies Joint-stock politics in Victorian England Timothy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Effigies of Přemyslid Rulers His Identity That Fuelled Many of His Other Projects Too
    The Friends of Czech Heritage Newsletter Issue 21 - Summer/Autumn 2019 The Effigies of Přemyslid Rulers his identity that fuelled many of his other projects too. Genealogical cycles were central to this as they in Prague Cathedral and the communicated the unbroken continuity of a long Beginning of Portraiture line of rulers and the role of Charles in that in Bohemia succession. Amongst these were the painted by Jana Gajdošová genealogical cycles of Holy Roman Emperors in Karlštejn and a painted genealogy of Přemyslid Often known as the father of the country to many rulers in Prague castle, neither of which survives Czechs, the celebrated Emperor Charles IV did not today. In the new cathedral, which was begun have an easy beginning as a Czech ruler. Although before Charles was even crowned King of he was born to Elizabeth of Přemyslid, a Bohemian Bohemia, this preoccupation was manifest first and princess, his father was John of Luxembourg, foremost by a grand new chapel, tomb and dubbed the foreign king because he spent most of reliquary for Saint Wenceslas – the canonised his time away from Bohemia. During his time away, Bohemian ruler. the Czech nobility took control of the country, a power that they subsequently found difficult to Some scholars argue that this focus on Charles’s surrender. To make matters more complicated, Bohemian lineage was present only at the when Charles was only seven years old, his father beginning of his reign, while after his coronation as took him from his mother in Prague and sent him Holy Roman Emperor in 1355, Charles focused to Paris – where he was heavily influenced by the more on his imperial lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernacular Historiography in Medieval Czech Lands
    VERNACULAR HISTORIOGRAPHY IN MEDIEVAL CZECH LANDS Marie Bláhová Univerzita Karlova z Praze Marie.Blahova@ff.cuni.cz Abstract In this work, it is offered an overview of medieval historiography in the Czech lands from origins to the fifteenth century, both in Latin and in the vernacular languages, as well as the factors that contributed to their development and dissemination. Keywords Vernacular Historiography, Czech Chronicles, Medieval Czech Literature. Resumen En este trabajo, se ofrece una visión de conjunto de la historiografía medieval en los terrorios checos desde orígenes hasta el siglo XV, tanto en latín como en las lenguas vernáculas, así como de los factores que contribuyeron a su elaboración y difusión. Palabras clave Historiografía vernácula, Crónicas checas, Literatura checa medieval. Te territory that would become the Czech Lands did not have a tradition of Classical culture. Bohemia and Moravia became acquainted with written culture, one of its integral parts, only after Christianity started to spread to this area in the 9th century. After a brief period in the 9th century when liturgy and culture in Moravia were mainly Slavic, the Czech Lands, much like the rest of Central Eu- rope, came to be dominated by the Latin culture and for several centuries Latin remained the only language of written records. Alongside the lives of saints and hagiographic legends which helped promote Christianity,1 historical records and later also larger, coherent historical narra- 1 Cf. Kubín (2011). MEDIEVALIA 19/1 (2016), 33-65 ISSN: 2014-8410 (digital) 34 MARIE BLÁHOVÁ tives2 are among the oldest products of written culture in the Czech Lands.3 Tey were created in the newly established ecclesiastical institutions, such as the episcopal church in Prague and the oldest monasteries.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 King Foreigner and Pater Patriae
    3 King Foreigner and Pater Patriae When political legitimacy depended on the right of descent, the extinc- tion of a ruling dynasty spelled trouble. During the four centuries of Prˇemyslid rule, however, the Czechs created a state with enough territo- rial and institutional stability to weather these problems. Beginning with the later Prˇemyslids and continuing under succeeding dynasties, a politi- cal system emerged based on estates (lords, knights, towns, and some- times clergy), giving the Bohemian crownlands their characteristic politi- cal structure for the next several centuries. During those centuries, the fluctuating fortunes of the realm would also provide much material for later generations to shape into the historical myth-images of golden ages and times of darkness, of ‘‘a nation great in glory and suffering.’’1 The first years after Va´clav III inclined to the latter image. BOHEMIA UNDER THE LUXEMBURGS: MEDIEVAL HIGH-WATER MARK After Va´clav III’s death, his sisters Anna and Elisˇka repre- sented the legitimate Prˇemyslid line. The Czech nobles preferred Anna’s husband, Henry of Carinthia, but Albrecht of Habsburg, King of the .......................... 10888$ $CH3 08-05-04 15:18:18 PS PAGE 29 30 THE CZECHS Romans, forced them to accept his son, Rudolf. Rudolf (1306–1307) died the year after his election, whereupon the Bohemian crown went to Henry (1307–1310), but his reliance on the towns and armed support from Carinthia and Meissen made him unpopular. Finally a group of nobles and church leaders approached Henry VII of Luxemburg, King of the Romans since Albrecht’s murder in 1308.
    [Show full text]
  • Twisted Roots by Carlos Alberto Montaner
    Twisted Roots A Look at the Historical and Cultural Influences that Shaped Latin America Into the Most Impoverished, Unstable, and Backward Region of the Western World by Carlos Alberto Montaner An indispensable book for understanding why Latin America has been, until now, an unfulfilled promise. -- Mario Vargas Llosa Translated by Louis Aguilar and Marilú del Toro1 1 Translator’s Note: Quotations were translated from the author’s Spanish and were not taken from the original English, in the case that the text had been written in English, or from published English translations of texts written in another language. The titles that appear in English of publications that were originally written in another language were either already in existence or were a direct translation from a simple title. For other, more difficult titles, they either appear only in the original language or, in the case of Spanish titles, they appear in the original Spanish and my own translation. The word “liberal” to refer to a political inclination is used to mean favoring little government intervention in the economy. 2 For Beatriz Bernal, to whom this book and I owe so much 3 “We live in difficult times during which we can neither speak nor refrain from speaking without running some danger.” -- Juan Luis Vives (Letter to Erasmus, 1540) “We are all but heart and soul. Remote from us is the dangerous novelty of thinking.” -- University of Cervera (“Declaration of Support to Ferdinand VII,” Gaceta de Madrid, May 3, 1827) “We have before our eyes two great examples: the American Revolution and the French.
    [Show full text]
  • Medievalista, 23 | 2018 the Justification of Tyrannicide in the Chronicle of Dalimil
    Medievalista Online 23 | 2018 Número 23 The Justification of Tyrannicide in the Chronicle of Dalimil. The Czech Nobility as the “Mystical Body” of the Realm A justificação do tiranicídio na ‘crónica de Dalimil’. A nobreza checa como o ‘corpo místico’ do reino Éloïse Adde Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/1606 DOI: 10.4000/medievalista.1606 ISSN: 1646-740X Publisher Instituto de Estudos Medievais - FCSH-UNL Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2018 Electronic reference Éloïse Adde, « The Justification of Tyrannicide in the Chronicle of Dalimil. The Czech Nobility as the “Mystical Body” of the Realm », Medievalista [Online], 23 | 2018, Online since 07 May 2018, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/1606 ; DOI : 10.4000/ medievalista.1606 This text was automatically generated on 19 April 2019. © IEM The Justification of Tyrannicide in the Chronicle of Dalimil. The Czech Nobil... 1 The Justification of Tyrannicide in the Chronicle of Dalimil. The Czech Nobility as the “Mystical Body” of the Realm A justificação do tiranicídio na ‘crónica de Dalimil’. A nobreza checa como o ‘corpo místico’ do reino Éloïse Adde EDITOR'S NOTE Data recepção do artigo / Received for publication: 16-03-2017 Data aceitação do artigo / Accepted in revised form: 20-10-2017 1 The Czech nobility enjoyed a very strong position in society at the beginning of the 14th century, thanks to a long tradition of gathering (assemblies)1 and a first crisis which began after the death of Přesmysl Ottokar II (1278)2. The young, new King of Bohemia, Wenceslas II (1278-1305)3, was immediately abducted by the regent Otto V of Bavaria (1267-1298).
    [Show full text]