Pacific Northwest Fungi Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Lichens' Microbiota, Still a Mystery?
fmicb-12-623839 March 24, 2021 Time: 15:25 # 1 REVIEW published: 30 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.623839 The Lichens’ Microbiota, Still a Mystery? Maria Grimm1*, Martin Grube2, Ulf Schiefelbein3, Daniela Zühlke1, Jörg Bernhardt1 and Katharina Riedel1 1 Institute of Microbiology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, 2 Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Graz, Austria, 3 Botanical Garden, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany Lichens represent self-supporting symbioses, which occur in a wide range of terrestrial habitats and which contribute significantly to mineral cycling and energy flow at a global scale. Lichens usually grow much slower than higher plants. Nevertheless, lichens can contribute substantially to biomass production. This review focuses on the lichen symbiosis in general and especially on the model species Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm., which is a large foliose lichen that occurs worldwide on tree trunks in undisturbed forests with long ecological continuity. In comparison to many other lichens, L. pulmonaria is less tolerant to desiccation and highly sensitive to air pollution. The name- giving mycobiont (belonging to the Ascomycota), provides a protective layer covering a layer of the green-algal photobiont (Dictyochloropsis reticulata) and interspersed cyanobacterial cell clusters (Nostoc spec.). Recently performed metaproteome analyses Edited by: confirm the partition of functions in lichen partnerships. The ample functional diversity Nathalie Connil, Université de Rouen, France of the mycobiont contrasts the predominant function of the photobiont in production Reviewed by: (and secretion) of energy-rich carbohydrates, and the cyanobiont’s contribution by Dirk Benndorf, nitrogen fixation. In addition, high throughput and state-of-the-art metagenomics and Otto von Guericke University community fingerprinting, metatranscriptomics, and MS-based metaproteomics identify Magdeburg, Germany Guilherme Lanzi Sassaki, the bacterial community present on L. -
Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O. -
Cladoniaceae, Ascomycota)
Persoonia 37, 2016: 1–12 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158516X688081 Sharpening the species boundaries in the Cladonia mediterranea complex (Cladoniaceae, Ascomycota) R. Pino-Bodas1, I. Pérez-Vargas2, S. Stenroos1, T. Ahti1, A.R. Burgaz 3 Key words Abstract The complex Cladonia mediterranea belongs to the section Impexae and is formed by C. azorica, C. maca ronesica and C. mediterranea. These species are basically distributed in the Mediterranean and Macaronesian coalescence Regions. In the present work the limits between the species of this complex are re-examined. To this end, the mor- Iberian Peninsula phological characters were studied along with the secondary metabolites and the DNA sequences from three loci integrative taxonomy (ITS rDNA, IGS rDNA and rpb2). The morphological data were studied by principal component analysis (PCA), while lichen forming fungi the DNA sequences were analyzed using several approaches available to delimit species: genealogical concor dance Macaronesia phylogenetic species recognition, species tree (BEAST* and spedeSTEM) and cohesion species recognition. In molecular systematic addition, the genealogical sorting index was used in order to assess the monophyly of the species. The different species delimitation procedures used in our study turned out to be highly congruent with respect to the limits they establish, but these taxonomy limits are not the ones separating the prior species. Either the morphological analysis or the different approaches to species delimitation indicate that C. mediterranea is a different species from C. macaronesica, while C. azorica and C. macaronesica, which are reduced to synonyms of C. portentosa, constitute a separate lineage. -
Modelling Lichen Abundance for Woodland Caribou in a Fire-Driven Boreal Landscape
Article Modelling Lichen Abundance for Woodland Caribou in a Fire-Driven Boreal Landscape Joseph A. Silva 1,*, Scott E. Nielsen 2 , Clayton T. Lamb 1 , Christine Hague 3 and Stan Boutin 1 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada; [email protected] (C.T.L.); [email protected] (S.B.) 2 Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada; [email protected] 3 Ontario Parks, Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, Red Lake, ON P0V 2M0, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-277-1940 Received: 18 September 2019; Accepted: 25 October 2019; Published: 1 November 2019 Abstract: Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) are reliant on Cladonia spp. ground lichens as a major component of their diet and lichen abundance could be an important indicator of habitat quality, particularly in winter. The boreal forest is typified by large, stand-replacing forest fires that consume ground lichens, which take decades to recover. The large spatial extent of caribou ranges and the mosaic of lichen availability created by fires make it challenging to track the abundance of ground lichens. Researchers have developed various techniques to map lichens across northern boreal and tundra landscapes, but it remains unclear which techniques are best suited for use in the continuous boreal forest, where many of the conflicts amongst caribou and human activities are most acute. In this study, we propose a two-stage regression modelling approach to map the abundance (biomass, kg/ha) of Cladonia spp. ground lichens in the boreal forest. -
Do Interstate Corridors Serve As Linear Dispersal Routes for Terricolous
LIVING AT THE EDGE Do interstate corridors serve as linear October 2016 dispersal routes for terricolous lichens? 2016 Fund for LSSU Grant Report Living at the edge Living at the edge DO INTERSTATE CORRID ORS SERVE AS LINEAR DISPERSAL ROUTES FOR TERRICOLOUS LICH ENS? ORIGINAL FUNDING DETAILS Funding amount: $500 Funding received: February 2016 Original Proposal Timeline: Project Length 1 year: Spring 2016 until Spring 2017 Genome Sequencing, and Microsatellite DNA Marker Design – Spring 2016 Initial primer trials and optimization – Late spring 2016 – Early Summer 2016 Field Collection and Fragmentation Trials – Summer 2016 DNA Isolation and analysis – Fall 2016 (partially integrated into BIOL220 as lab exercises) Completion of Analysis and presentation of results – Spring 2017 CURRENT PROGRESS Thanks to the funding from the LSSU Foundation’s Fund for LSSU grant we were able to purchase Cladonia rangiferina (grey reindeer lichen) tissue cultures from ATCC.org (the American Type Culture Collection). These initial cultures were used to establish an ongoing axenic (pure) tissue culture of C. rangiferina’s mycobiont. This was a critical step for the eventual goal of sequencing the lichens genome because C. rangiferina, like all lichens, normally exists as a composite organism that combines a fungus (the mycobiont) with an algal and/or bacterial photosynthetic partner (the photobiont – a species of green algae in this case) (figure 1). This symbiosis imparts numerous advantages to the lichens such as incredible hardiness and the ability to colonize habitats long before other form of life. However, this also complicates matters, from a genetics point of view, as it makes it very difficult to know whose DNA you are isolating from a wild collected sample for sequencing. -
Influence of Pinus Contorta and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi on The
IdeaFest: Interdisciplinary Journal of Creative Works and Research from Humboldt State University Volume 4 IdeaFest Journal Article 2 2020 Influence of Pinus Contorta and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi on the Presence of Cladonia Portentosa Subspecies Pacifica Within Protected Dune Ecosystems in Arcata, California Courtney Michelle Harris Humboldt State University Kacia Layman Humboldt State University Jamie Wautlet Humboldt State University Grace Rhoades Humboldt State University Chris Belko Humboldt State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/ideafest Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Harris, Courtney Michelle; Layman, Kacia; Wautlet, Jamie; Rhoades, Grace; and Belko, Chris (2020) "Influence of Pinus Contorta and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi on the Presence of Cladonia Portentosa Subspecies Pacifica Within Protected Dune Ecosystems in Arcata, California," IdeaFest: Interdisciplinary Journal of Creative Works and Research from Humboldt State University: Vol. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/ideafest/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in IdeaFest: Interdisciplinary Journal of Creative Works and Research from Humboldt State University by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Influence of Pinus Contorta and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi on the Presence of Cladonia Portentosa Subspecies Pacifica Within Protected Dune Ecosystems in Arcata, California Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge Adrian Macedo for his help in analyzing our data, the Citizen Science members who have helped contribute data to the inaturalist app and the docents of Ma-le'l Dunes and the Lanphere Dunes unit who allowed us to survey the protected dune habitats. -
What Is a Lichen – a Prison Or an Opportunity? Lichens Cannot Be Classified As Plants
What is a lichen – a prison or an opportunity? Lichens cannot be classified as plants. They are associations between cup fungi ascomycetes plus either green algae (Trebouxia sp.) or cyanobacteria (e.g. Nostoc), members of three kingdoms outside the plant kingdom. Simon Schwendener discovered the dual nature of lichens in 1869 : Ascomycetes surround some single- celled green algae with a fibrous net to compel the new slaves to work for them, a view that was replaced with romanticized notion of a harmonious symbiosis. Mycobiont gets sugar alcohols from green algae or glucose + nitrogen from cyanobacteria, which are stored in an inacessible form (e.g. mannitol). Lichens Species & Diversity Lichens consist of a fungus (the mycobiont, mostly an ascomycete ) & a photosynthetic partner (the photobiont or phycobiont ), usually either a green alga (commonly Trebouxia ) or cyanobacterium (c. Nostoc ) All lichens have an upper cortex , which is a dense, protective skin of fungal tissue that acts l ike a blind that opens after watering . Below that is a photosynthetic layer, which can be a colony of either green algae or cyanobacteria. Then there is a layer of loose threads (hyphae) of the fungus, called the medulla or the medullary layer . Fructicose & Foliose lichens have a lower cortex , others just have an exposed medulla. Crustose lichens never have a lower cortex-their fungal layer attaches firmly to the substrate. What is that? Is that a plant? Is that a fungus? Is that a lichen? What the …halloh! Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides ) Usnea is a lichen (a composite organism closely resembles its namesake ( Usnea , or made from algae and fungi) and is referred beard lichen), but in fact it is not to as Old Man's Beard. -
Sommerfeltia
sommerfeltia 2 R.H. 0kland & E. Bendiksen The vegetation of the forest-alpine transition in the Grunningsdalen area, Telemark, S. Norway. - 1985 sommerfeltia is owned and edited by the Botanical Garden and Museum, University of Oslo . SOMMER FELTIA is named in honour of the e minent Norwegian botanist and clergyman S~ren Christian Sommerfelt (1794- 1838). The generic name Sommerfeltia has been used in (1) the lichens by Florke 1827, now Solorina, (2) Leguminosae by Schumacher 1827, now Drepanocarpus, and (3) Compositae by :r.e ssing 1832, nom . cons. SOMMERFELTIA is a series of monographs in plant taxonomy, phytogeography, phytosociology, plant ecology, plant mo rphology, and evolutionary botany . Papers are by Norwegian authors. They are in English or, less often, in Norwegian with an Enqlish summary. An article must be 32 printed pages or more to be accepted. Authors not on the staff of the Botanical Ga rden and Museum in Oslo pay a page charge of NOK 20.00. SOMMERFELTIA appears at irregular intervals, one article per volume. Editor: Dr . Anders Danielsen. Editorial Board: Scientific staff of the Botanical Garden and Museum. Address: SOMMERFELTIA, Botanical Garden and Museum, University of Oslo, Trondheimsveien 23B, N-0562 Oslo 5, Norway. Order: On a standing order (payment on receipt of each volume) SOMMERFELTIA is supplied at 30% discount. Separate volumes are supplied at the following regular rates (1985 prices): Volumes of 32-42 pages NOK 0.80 per page Volumes of 43 - 60 pages N0K 0.65 per page Volumes of 61-120 pages NOK 0.45 per page Volumes o f more than 120 pages NOK 0 . -
Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 Is a Scientific Reference Document
INTERPRETATION MANUAL OF EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS EUR 27 July 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENVIRONMENT Nature and biodiversity The Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 is a scientific reference document. It is based on the version for EUR15, which was adopted by the Habitats Committee on 4. October 1999 and consolidated with the new and amended habitat types for the 10 accession countries as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 14 March 2002 with additional changes for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 13 April 2007 and for marine habitats to follow the descriptions given in “Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives” published in May 2007 by the Commission services. A small amendment to Habitat type 91D0 was adopted by the Habitats Committee in its meeting on 14th October 2003. TABLE OF CONTENTS WHY THIS MANUAL? 3 HISTORICAL REVIEW 3 THE MANUAL 4 THE EUR15 VERSION 5 THE EUR25 VERSION 5 THE EUR27 VERSION 6 EXPLANATORY NOTES 7 COASTAL AND HALOPHYTIC HABITATS 8 OPEN SEA AND TIDAL AREAS 8 SEA CLIFFS AND SHINGLE OR STONY BEACHES 17 ATLANTIC AND CONTINENTAL SALT MARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 20 MEDITERRANEAN AND THERMO-ATLANTIC SALTMARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 22 SALT AND GYPSUM INLAND STEPPES 24 BOREAL BALTIC ARCHIPELAGO, COASTAL AND LANDUPHEAVAL AREAS 26 COASTAL SAND DUNES AND INLAND DUNES 29 SEA DUNES OF THE ATLANTIC, NORTH SEA AND BALTIC COASTS 29 SEA DUNES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN COAST 35 INLAND -
Report: LURI 1972-08 Ls*Cs in the REINDEER LICHEN CLADONIA
Report: LURI 1972-08 i ls*Cs IN THE REINDEER LICHEN CLADONIA ALPESTRIS; DEPOSITION, RETENTION AND INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION, 1961 - 1970 L J Sören Mattsson I August, 1972 Radiation Physics Department, University of Lund, Läsaretttt, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. COLLECTION AND PREPARATION OF SAMPLES 5 3. METHODS OF MEASUREMENT 10 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 12 4.1 The l37Cs-content in the unfractionated lichen-carpet 12 4.2 Vertical distribution of I37Cs in the lichen-carpet and in underlying layers of gelatinous matter, humus and soil 18 4.3 Mathematical description of the verti- cal distribution of 137Cs 22 4.4 Factors affecting the vertical distribu- tion of 137Cs 27 4.5 Mechanisms of retention and transport for 1S7Cs in lichen 29 4.6 137Cs/'°Sr-activity ratio in different parts of the lichen-carpet and in under- lying material 36 4.7 Estimated effects of reindeer-grazing 37 5. CONCLUSION 39 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS '.. 40 REFERENCES 41 lsTCs IN THE REINDEER LICHEN CLADONIA ALPESTRIS; DEPOSITION> RETENTION AND INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION. 1961 - 1970 L J SÖREN MATTSSON Radiation Physics Department, University of Lund Lasarettet, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden ABSTRACT The accumulation of the fallout radionuclide 137Cs has been studied in a large number of samples of the important reindeer-lichen Cladonia alpestris, collected in the Lake Rogen area (62.3°N, 12.1°E) in central Sweden during the period 1961 - 1970. The maximum area-content of l37 Cs in the lichen-carpet occurred in 196 5 and 1966, and amounted to U6 - 66 nCi m"2, which corresponds to a dry-mass con- tent of 3U - 52 nCi kg"1, due to the special characteristics of the lichen-carpet and of the locality itself. -
New Species and New Records of American Lichenicolous Fungi
DHerzogiaIEDERICH 16: New(2003): species 41–90 and new records of American lichenicolous fungi 41 New species and new records of American lichenicolous fungi Paul DIEDERICH Abstract: DIEDERICH, P. 2003. New species and new records of American lichenicolous fungi. – Herzogia 16: 41–90. A total of 153 species of lichenicolous fungi are reported from America. Five species are described as new: Abrothallus pezizicola (on Cladonia peziziformis, USA), Lichenodiplis dendrographae (on Dendrographa, USA), Muellerella lecanactidis (on Lecanactis, USA), Stigmidium pseudopeltideae (on Peltigera, Europe and USA) and Tremella lethariae (on Letharia vulpina, Canada and USA). Six new combinations are proposed: Carbonea aggregantula (= Lecidea aggregantula), Lichenodiplis fallaciosa (= Laeviomyces fallaciosus), L. lecanoricola (= Laeviomyces lecanoricola), L. opegraphae (= Laeviomyces opegraphae), L. pertusariicola (= Spilomium pertusariicola, Laeviomyces pertusariicola) and Phacopsis fusca (= Phacopsis oxyspora var. fusca). The genus Laeviomyces is considered to be a synonym of Lichenodiplis, and a key to all known species of Lichenodiplis and Minutoexcipula is given. The genus Xenonectriella is regarded as monotypic, and all species except the type are provisionally kept in Pronectria. A study of the apothecial pigments does not support the distinction of Nesolechia and Phacopsis. The following 29 species are new for America: Abrothallus suecicus, Arthonia farinacea, Arthophacopsis parmeliarum, Carbonea supersparsa, Coniambigua phaeographidis, Diplolaeviopsis -
Natura 2000 Interpretation Manual of European Union
NATURA 2000 INTERPRETATION MANUAL OF EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS Version EUR 15 Q) .c Ol c: 0 "iii 0 ·"'a <>c: ~ u.. C: ~"' @ *** EUROPEAN COMMISSION ** ** DGXI ... * * Environment, Nuclear Security and Civil Protection 0 *** < < J J ) NATURA 2000 INTERPRETATION MANUAL OF EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS Version EUR 15 This 111anual is a scientific reference document adopted by the habitats committee on 25 April 1996 Compiled by : Carlos Romio (DG. XI • 0.2) This document is edited by Directorate General XI "Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection" of the European Commission; author service: Unit XI.D.2 "Nature Protection, Coastal Zones and Tourism". 200 rue de Ia Loi, B-1049 Bruxelles, with the assistance of Ecosphere- 3, bis rue des Remises, F-94100 Saint-Maur-des-Fosses. Neither the European Commission, nor any person acting on its behalf, is responsible for the use which may be made of this document. Contents WHY THIS MANUAL?---------------- 1 Historical review ............................................... 1 The Manual .................................................... 1 THE EUR15 VERSION 3 Biogeographical regions .......................................... 3 Vegetation levels ................................................ 4 Explanatory notes ............................................... 5 COASTAL AND HALOPHYTIC HABITATS 6 Open sea and tidal areas . 6 Sea cliffs and shingle or stony beaches ............................ 10 Atlantic and continental salt marshes and salt meadows . 12 Mediterranean and thermo-Atlantic saltmarshes and salt meadows .... 14 Salt and gypsum continental steppes . 15 COASTAL SAND DUNES AND CONTINENTAL DUNES 17 Sea dunes of the Atlantic, North Sea and Baltic coasts ............... 17 Sea dunes of the Mediterranean coast . 22 Continental dunes, old and decalcified . 24 FRESHWATER HABITATS 26 Standing water . 26 Running water . 29 TEMPERATE HEATH AND SCRUB------------ 33 SCLEROPHYLLOUS SCRUB (MATORRAL) 40 Sub-Mediterranean and temperate .