DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 CBP/TRS 164/97 EPA 903R -97-004 A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 Chesapeake Bay Program February 1997 Chesapeake Bay Program The Chesapeake Bay Program is a unique regional partnership leading and directing restoration of Chesapeake Bay since 1983. The Chesapeake Bay Program partners include the states of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia; the District of Columbia; the Chesapeake Bay Commission, a tri-state legislative body; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which represents the federal government; and participating citizen advisory groups. In the 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Chesapeake Bay Program partners set a goal to reduce the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus entering the Bay by 40% by the year 2000. In the 1992 Amendments to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement, partners agreed to maintain the 40% goal beyond the year 2000 and to attack nutrients at their source--upstream in the tributaries. The Chesapeake Executive Council, made up of the governors of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia; the mayor of Washington, D.C.; the EPA administrator; and the chair of the Chesapeake Bay Commission, guided the restoration effort in 1993 with five directives addressing key areas of the restoration, including the tributaries, toxics, underwater bay grasses, fish passages, and agricultural nonpoint source pollution. In 1994, partners outlined initiatives for habitat restoration of aquatic, riparian, and upland environments; nutrient reduction in the Bay's tributaries; and toxics reductions, with an emphasis on pollution prevention. The 1995 Local Government Partnership Initiative engages the watershed’s 1,650 local governments in the Bay restoration effort. The Chesapeake Executive Council followed this in 1996 by adopting the Local Government Participation Action Plan and the Priorities for Action for Land, Growth and Stewardship in the Chesapeake Bay Region, which address land use management, growth and development, stream corridor protection, and infrastructure improvements. A 1996 riparian forest buffers initiative furthers the Bay Program’s commitment to improving water quality and enhancing habitat with the goal of increasing riparian buffers on 2,010 miles of stream and shoreline in the watershed by the year 2010. Since its inception, the Chesapeake Bay Program's highest priority has been the restoration of the Bay's living resources--its finfish, shellfish, bay grasses, and other aquatic life and wildlife. Improvements include fisheries and habitat restoration, recovery of bay grasses, nutrient reductions, and significant advances in estuarine science. A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 February 1997 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Suite 300, 6110 Executive Blvd. Rockville, Maryland 20852 Printed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the Chesapeake Bay Program EPA 903R-97-004 CBP/TRS 164/97 To receive additional copies of this report, please write Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 or call 1-800-YOURBAY (1-800-968-7229). Acknowledgments Development of A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Contract CB-993038-02-0) and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, an interstate compact river basin commission whose signatories are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and the District of Columbia. This document was compiled by Jacqueline Johnson, Scott M. Gibbons and Claire Buchanan, all of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Ms. Johnson currently serves as the CBP Biological Monitoring Data Manager. The authors wish to acknowledge the cooperation of William Burton and the staff of Versar, Inc., Kevin Sellner, Richard Lacouture and Stella Brownlee Sellner of the Academy of Natural Sciences Benedict Estuarine Research Center; and Harold Marshall, Ray Birdsong and Dan Dauer of Old Dominion University in providing up-to-date species lists for the Chesapeake Bay Program benthic, zooplankton and phytoplankton monitoring programs. The authors also acknowledge the cooperation of R. Christian Jones of George Mason University in providing species lists for the Gunston Cove Ecosystem Monitoring Program. ii Sources of Species Information A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 is an update of a 1992 document published by the Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office (CBP/TRS 70/92). It provides a list of aquatic and aquatic-associated organisms found in recent decades in the Chesapeake Bay Basin. The list was originally extracted from monitoring data collected by federal and state agencies and private institutions. An extensive search identified other available aquatic Chesapeake Bay species information. Species data were collected from the following agencies: g Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin g Maryland Department of the Environment g Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences Species identified by these sources were then verified and merged with: g preexisting EPA Chesapeake Bay species list In addition, three documents were reviewed to identify and include water-associated biota such as waterfowl, raptors and wetlands vegetation: g Habitat Requirements for Chespeake Bay Living Resources. 1991. Editors: S. L. Funderburk, S. J. Jordan, J. A. Mihursky and D. Riley for the Living Resources Subcommittee of the Chesapeake Bay Program. g Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay. 1989. Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences, Gloucester Point, VA. g Life in the Chesapeake Bay. 1984. A. J. Lippson and R. L. Lippson. The Johns Hopkins University Press. A comprehensive species list for the Potomac Estuary developed by the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin in 1993 was used to begin updating the 1992 CBP document. The Commission had collected species information from master lists of the following organizations and monitoring programs: g Academy of Natural Sciences, Benedict Estuarine Research Center g Versar, Inc. g Gunston Cove Ecosystem Monitoring Program, George Mason University g District of Columbia Biomonitoring Program g Public Health Service National Water Quality Network (1958 - 1968) and from documents: g Environmental Atlas of the Potomac Estuary. undated. A. J. Lippson et al. Prepared by Environmental Center, Martin Marietta Corporation for the Power Plant Siting Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. g Index and Field Guide to the Fishes of the District of Columbia. 1987. J. D. Cummins. District of Columbia, Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Environmental Control Division, Fisheries. iii A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 g Field Guide to the Submerged Aquatic Vegetation of Chesapeake Bay. 1990. L. M. Hurley. US Fish & Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Estuary Program. Newly identified species in the Maryland and Virginia Chesapeake Bay biomonitoring programs were added and the list reviewed to remove duplications and errors. Species were then matched by scientific name to their National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC) codes. Any remaining species that could not be matched by either NODC code or scientific name were reexamined. If they proved to be valid species, they were given temporary codes. Organization and Availability The master list of Chesapeake basin species compiled in this report is arranged alphabetically by scientific name. Associated with each species is its most recent NODC code, its Taxon Serial Number (TSN) recently developed by EPA, NOAA and other organizations, and its common name if one exists. The document is available in hardcopy from: Biological Monitoring Data Manager US EPA Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 An ASCII, comma delimited file of the species master list and associated species codes is available to users with accounts on the CBP CHESIE computer. The file is located in the CHESIE directory LR disk:[LR.PUBLIC] and is named NODCCODE.TXT. This document is also available on the CBP Internet Home Page (http://www.epa.gov/r3chespk/) as SPECIE97.PDF. NODC and Taxonomic Serial Number Codes This document makes extensive use of the NODC Taxon Codes Version 7.0. The NODC Taxon Code is a hierarchial system of numerical codes used to represent the scientific names of organisms. The code links the Linnean system of biological nomenclature to a numerical schema that facilitates modern methods of computerized data storage and retrieval. An NODC code contains a maximum of 12 digits partitioned into 2-digit couplets. Each couplet represents one or more levels of the taxonomic hierarchy. For example, Digit Represents 1-2 Phylum 3-4 Class and/or Order 5-6 Family 7-8 Genus 9-10 Species 11-12 Subspecies One drawback of the NODC code is it changes over time to reflect current changes in taxonomic classifications. However, it provides data analysts with a tool for sorting organisms along taxonomic lines. The Taxonomic Serial Number (TSN) of each organism is also provided in this document. Federal iv A Comprehensive List of Chesapeake Bay Basin Species 1997 agencies developing the NODC code have also adopted the TSN code which assigns each recognized species a permanent number. The TSN allows a species to be tracked over time regardless of changes in name and taxonomic classification. When used in conjunction with the NODC, the TSN overcomes the problem of numeric changes in the NODC code whenever species are reclassified. In cases where a species is recognized in the scientific literature but has not yet been assigned an NODC Code and a TSN, temporary values have been assigned. The value BAYxxxx has been assigned to all species without TSN. Partial NODC Codes have been assigned with alphabetic characters in place of missing digits for missing genus and species values.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University M'ProCms International A Ben & Howe'' Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor Ml 40106-1346 USA 3-3 761-4 700 800 501 0600 Order Numb e r 9022566 S o m e aspects of the functional morphology of the shell of infaunal bivalves (Mollusca) Watters, George Thomas, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-668
    NOAA TR NMFS SSRF-668 A UNITED STATES NMFS SSRF-668 DEPARTMENT OF NOAA Technical Report COMMERCE PUBLICATION r Oiological Unoralory Marine | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE J ^^P^^tSX National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Jilt "3 1973 National Marine Fisheries Service L An Annotated Bibliography of the Gunner, TBUtogo/abrus adspersus (Walbaum) FREDRIC M. SERCHUK and DAVID W. FRAME SEATTLE, WA May 1973 NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Marine Fisheries Service, Special Scientific Report-Fisheries Series The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, develop- ment and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off' United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also as- sists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. It collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The Special Scientific Report—Fisheries series was established in 1949. The series carries reports on scien- scientific tific investigations that document long-term continuing programs of NMFS, or intensive reports on studies of restricted scope. The reports may deal with applied fishery problems. The series is also used as a medium for the publication of bibliographies of a specialized scientific nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Phlebobranchia of CTAW
    PHLEBOBRANCHIA PHLEBOBRANCHIA The suborder Phlebobranchia (order Enterogona) is characterised by having unpaired gonads present only on the same side of the body as the gut. As in Stolidobranchia, the body is not divided into different sections (such as thorax, abdomen and posterior abdomen) as the gut is folded up in the parietal body wall outside the pharynx and the large branchial sac occupies the whole length of the body. Usually the branchial sac (which is flat, without folds) has internal longitudinal vessels (although only vestiges remain in Agneziidae). Epicardial sacs do not persist in adults as they do in Aplousobranchia, although excretory vesicles (nephrocytes) embedded in the body wall over the gut are known to originate from the embryonic epicardium in Ascidiidae and Corellidae. Most phlebobranchs are solitary. However, Plurellidae Kott, 1973 includes both solitary and colonial forms, and Perophoridae Giard, 1872 are all colonial. Replication in Perophoridae is from ectodermal epithelium (rather than endodermal or mesodermal tissue the mesodermal tissue of the vascular stolon (rather than the endodermal tissue as in most as in Aplousobranchia). The process of replication has not been investigated in Plurellidae. Phlebobranch taxa occurring in Australia are documented in Kott (1985). Family level taxa are characterised principally by the size and form of the branchial sac including the number of branchial vessels and form of the stigmata; the form, size and position of the gonads; and the habit (colonial or solitary) of the taxon. Berrill (1950) has discussed problems in assessing the phylogeny of Perophoridae. References Berrill, N.J. (1950). The Tunicata. Ray Soc. Publs 133: 1–354 Giard, A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Horseshoe Crab Limulus Polyphemus
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Atlantic Horseshoe Crab Limulus polyphemus Contributor (2005): Elizabeth Wenner (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited (2013): Larry Delancey and Peter Kingsley-Smith [SCDNR] DESCRITPION Taxonomy and Basic Description Despite their name, horseshoe crabs are not true crabs. The Atlantic horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, is the only member of the Arthropoda subclass Xiphosura found in the Atlantic. Unlike true crabs, which have 2 pairs of antennae, a pair of jaws and 5pairs of legs, horseshoe crabs lack antennae and jaws and have 7 pairs of legs, including a pair of chelicerae. Chelicerae are appendages similar to those used by spiders and scorpions for grasping and crushing. In addition, horseshoe crabs have book lungs, similar to spiders and different from crabs, which have gills. Thus, horseshoe crabs are more closely related to spiders and scorpions than they are to other crabs. Their carapace is divided into three sections: the anterior portion is the prosoma; the middle section is the opithosoma; and the “tail” is called the telson. Horseshoe crabs have two pairs of eyes located on the prosoma, one anterior set of simple eyes, and one set of lateral compound eyes similar to those of insects. In addition, they possess a series of photoreceptors on the opithosoma and telson (Shuster 1982). Horseshoe crabs are long-lived animals. After attaining sexual maturity at 9 to 12 years of age, they may live for another 10 years or more. Like other arthropods, horseshoe crabs must molt in order to grow. As the horseshoe crab ages, more and more time passes between molts, with 16 to 19 molts occurring before a crab becomes mature, stops growing, and switches energy expenditure to reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos
    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
    [Show full text]
  • Misc Thesisdb Bythesissuperv
    Honors Theses 2006 to August 2020 These records are for reference only and should not be used for an official record or count by major or thesis advisor. Contact the Honors office for official records. Honors Year of Student Student's Honors Major Thesis Title (with link to Digital Commons where available) Thesis Supervisor Thesis Supervisor's Department Graduation Accounting for Intangible Assets: Analysis of Policy Changes and Current Matthew Cesca 2010 Accounting Biggs,Stanley Accounting Reporting Breaking the Barrier- An Examination into the Current State of Professional Rebecca Curtis 2014 Accounting Biggs,Stanley Accounting Skepticism Implementation of IFRS Worldwide: Lessons Learned and Strategies for Helen Gunn 2011 Accounting Biggs,Stanley Accounting Success Jonathan Lukianuk 2012 Accounting The Impact of Disallowing the LIFO Inventory Method Biggs,Stanley Accounting Charles Price 2019 Accounting The Impact of Blockchain Technology on the Audit Process Brown,Stephen Accounting Rebecca Harms 2013 Accounting An Examination of Rollforward Differences in Tax Reserves Dunbar,Amy Accounting An Examination of Microsoft and Hewlett Packard Tax Avoidance Strategies Anne Jensen 2013 Accounting Dunbar,Amy Accounting and Related Financial Statement Disclosures Measuring Tax Aggressiveness after FIN 48: The Effect of Multinational Status, Audrey Manning 2012 Accounting Dunbar,Amy Accounting Multinational Size, and Disclosures Chelsey Nalaboff 2015 Accounting Tax Inversions: Comparing Corporate Characteristics of Inverted Firms Dunbar,Amy Accounting Jeffrey Peterson 2018 Accounting The Tax Implications of Owning a Professional Sports Franchise Dunbar,Amy Accounting Brittany Rogan 2015 Accounting A Creative Fix: The Persistent Inversion Problem Dunbar,Amy Accounting Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act: The Most Revolutionary Piece of Tax Szwakob Alexander 2015D Accounting Dunbar,Amy Accounting Legislation Since the Introduction of the Income Tax Prasant Venimadhavan 2011 Accounting A Proposal Against Book-Tax Conformity in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Title CUMACEAN CRUSTACEA from AKKESHI BAY, HOKKAIDO Author(S) Gamo, Sigeo Citation PUBLICATIONS of the SETO MARINE BIOLOGICAL LA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository CUMACEAN CRUSTACEA FROM AKKESHI BAY, Title HOKKAIDO Author(s) Gamo, Sigeo PUBLICATIONS OF THE SETO MARINE BIOLOGICAL Citation LABORATORY (1965), 13(3): 187-219 Issue Date 1965-10-30 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/175407 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University 1 CUMACEAN CRUSTACEA FROM AKKESHI BAY, HOKKAID0 ) SIGEO GAMO Faculty of Liberal Arts and Education, Yokohama National University, Kamakura, Kanagawa-Ken With 12 Text-figures Our knowledge of the Cumacea of Hokkaido and its adjacent waters is due to the contributions of DERZHA VIN (1923, 1926), U:ENo (1933, 1936), ZIMMER (1929, 1939, 1940, 1943) and LOMAKINA (1955 a-b; 1958 a-b). + Tomata Sempoji krn Fig. 1. Map of Akkeshi Bay. Solid circles with numbers indicate the stations where the cumaceans were collected by the Ekman-Berge bottom-sampling grab, 19-21 show the places where the subsurface towing of plankton-net was made at night. "~---------- ---- ---"---~- 1) Contributions from the Akkeshi Marine Biological Station, No. 126. Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab., XIII (3), 187-219, 1965. (Article 10) f-l ~ Table 1. Occurrence of cumaceans in Akkeshi Bay. Station number 1_1_ _:__3___ 4 ___ 5 ___ 6 ___7 ___8_1_9_ 10 11-12~_::_~~~~ 18 19120121 Depth (m) 2 1 3 8 2 0.3 9 11 11 14 8-12 6 13 14 15 0.3 0.3 night ______B_o_t_t-om_c_h-aracter ~~~~~sis~~~~ sM s andMI s ~s~ss ~~~~~~ Srecies of cumaceans Bodotriidae I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidians from the Tropical Western Pacific
    Ascidians from the tropical western Pacific Françoise MONNIOT Claude MONNIOT CNRS UPESA 8044, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés marins et Malacologie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 55 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris (France) [email protected] Monniot F. & Monniot C. 2001. — Ascidians from the tropical western Pacific. Zoosystema 23 (2) : 201-383. ABSTRACT A large collection of 187 identified ascidian species is added to the records published in 1996 from the same tropical western Pacific islands. Most of the specimens were collected by the US Coral Reef Research Foundation (CRRF). They come from depths accessible by SCUBA diving. Most of the collection’s species are described and figured, their color in life is illustrated by 112 underwater photographs; among them 48 are new species represent- ing a fourth of the material collected. This demonstrates how incomplete the knowledge of the ascidian diversity in this part of the world remains. Moreover, very small or inconspicuous species were seldom collected, as com- pared to the highly coloured and large forms. Many other immature speci- mens were also collected but their precise identification was not possible. Almost all littoral families are represented with the exception of the Molgulidae which are more characteristic of soft sediments, a biotope which was not investigated. Among the very diversified genera, the colonial forms largely dominate, including not only all the Aplousobranchia genera but also some Phlebobranchia and Stolidobranchia. Very often only one specimen was KEY WORDS Tunicata, available, so a detailed biogeographical distribution cannot be given, and no western Pacific Ocean. island endemism can be defined. ZOOSYSTEMA • 2001 • 23 (2) © Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson (PDF 76
    Common Life in the Marine Biome Instructions: Scientists use dichotomous keys to organize and identify specimens. Dichotomous means dividing into two parts – a dichotomous key provides two choices in each step. For example: to divide a package of multi-coloured pens into two groups, you might decide to divide the pens by “has blue ink” and “does not have blue ink”. Work together at each station and use the available tools and key information to identify the different specimens. Record your answers on your results page. Station 1 – Echinoderms 1. a. Specimen has arms…………………………………………………………………….………..go to 2 b. Specimen does not have arms………………………………………………..………….go to 4 2. a. Specimen usually has 5 arms………………………..……………………………..…...go to 3 b. Specimen usually has more than 5 arms (when intact)………………………………………………………………………………………Common sun star 3. a. Specimen has a central, armoured disc with long, thin arms…………………………………………………………………………………………...Daisy brittle star b. Specimen does not armoured disc, and has large, thicker arms………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Sea star There are different species of sea star in Nova Scotian waters. Often, the easiest identification relates to colour. For example, the northern sea star and Forbes’ sea star can both have colorful bodies (purple, tan, red, etc.), however the northern sea star has a pale yellow madreporite and the Forbes’ sea star has a bright orange madreporite. 4. a. Specimen is round and flat with short, fuzz-like spines (live) or smooth without spines (dead)…..………………………………………………………………....Sand dollar b. Specimen has a dome shape with long, thicker spines (live) or lacks spines (dead).…………………………………………………………………………..Green sea urchin Common Life in the Marine Biome Page 2 of 4 Station 2 – Gastropods 1.
    [Show full text]