DOCSLIB.ORG

Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Adopted by Selectboard: February 19, 2015 Formally Approved by FEMA: __________________ TUNBRIDGE, VERMONT 2014-19 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Tunbridge Planning Commission Tunbridge Selectboard Dan Ruddell Nancy Chapman Ingrid Van Steamburg Sue Clark Sarah Ballou Gary Mullen Gary Mullen Ingrid Van Steamburg Bob Dunkle Liz York Ben Wolfe Erin Gooch Ted Hoyt Brenda Field Planning Consultants Peg Elmer, AICP Community-Resilience.org Sharon Murray, AICP Front Porch Community Planning & Design Technical Support Euclid Farnham TunbridgeTown Moderator, Historian Daniel Ruddell Red Start Consulting, Tunbridge Lister John Durkee, Chief Tunbridge Volunteer Fire Department Ben Wolfe Tunbridge Lister Helen O’Donnell Tunbridge Lister Adam Smith Tunbridge Lister Rodney Hoyt Tunbridge Road Foreman Brian Hamlin Two-Rivers Ottauquechee Regional Commission Peter Fellows CFM Two-Rivers Ottauquechee Regional Commission Kevin Geiger AICP, CFM Two-Rivers Ottauquechee Regional Commission Ned Swanberg CFM Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Floodplain Management Funding Support This plan and its development was funded by a Federal Emergency Management Agency Hazard Mitigation Planning Grant administered by Vermont Emergency Management Cover Art ii | Page TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN "Tunbridge, VT 1941" by David Wright http://www.nostalgia-usa.com/ Used with permission of the artist. TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Page | iii TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2014 -19 TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPACT AND EXTENT OF LIKELY HAZARDS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 COMMUNITY ASSETS AND VULNERABILITIES FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 2. COMMUNITY PROFILE 4 6. MITIGATION STRATEGIES 31 3. PLANNING PROCESS 12 GOALS AND POLICIES PUBLIC PROCESS EXISTING PROGRAMS DATA AND INFORMATION RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES INTEGRATION INTO TOWN DECISION-MAKING 7. MITIGATION PROGRAM: THE PLAN FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS!N 36 4. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 15 COUNTY DATA IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE LOCAL INFORMATION 5. VULNERABILITY & RISK ASSESSMENT 25 MAPS 40 APPENDICES 42 TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Page | v 1. INTRODUCTION increased community and voter support for specific Hazard mitigation planning identifies actions that a actions the town may take to reduce future losses, community can take to reduce or eliminate long term strengthened partnerships and lines of communica- risk to people and property from natural and tion among diverse interests, including opportunities manmade hazards. The Federal Emergency Manage- to leverage and share resources, and ment Agency (FEMA) further describes it as a process community eligibility for federal hazard mitigation state and local governments can use to identify risks grants and aid prior to and following federally- and vulnerabilities associated with natural disasters, in declared disasters. order to develop long-term strategies to protect Process. The previous Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan people and property from future hazard events was adopted on June 23, 2011 as a six-page “annex” (www.fema.gov/plan/mitplanning). to the multi-jurisdictional All-Hazard Pre-Disaster Purpose. The purpose of this hazard mitigation plan is Mitigation (PDM) Plan adopted by the Two Rivers- to identify and plan for hazards facing the town, Ottauquechee Regional Commission (TRORC) in 2008. including the development of strategies intended to The regional plan and Tunbridge annex both expired reduce long-term risks from known hazards. Hazards on September 30, 2013. cannot be eliminated, but it is possible through Since the last plan was adopted and approved by the planning to determine what hazards are most frequent, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), where they may be most severe, and what actions can Vermont was hit hard by two major floods, including be taken to reduce their impact on the community. Tropical Storm Irene in August 2011. During the Benefits of hazard mitigation planning include: intervening period FEMA also adopted a new “National increased public awareness and understanding of Mitigation Framework” and, in 2013, updated guidance natural and manmade hazards, associated risks for local hazard mitigation planning. Vermont’s and community vulnerabilities, ongoing recovery efforts and FEMA’s new mitigation reduced physical, financial and emotional losses framework both focus on strengthening community caused by disasters, “resilience” – to not only understand and reduce risks of improved understanding of potential risks and future events, but to also empower communities to possible risk reduction measures associated with recover quickly and effectively when disasters occur. future development, TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Page | 1 Of particular note – the state recently adopted new Tunbridge agreed to participate under the FEMA grant, Emergency Relief and Assistance Fund (ERAF) rules, as an example of a small, rural community with strong effective October 2014, that provide additional social ties and limited staff and technical resources, to matching funds for federal disaster relief under FEMA’s help test and hone public outreach tools, and to help Public Assistance Program for municipalities that have develop mitigation strategies appropriate in com- adopted updated bridge and culvert standards, flood munities that have not adopted traditional zoning and and fluvial erosion hazard area regulations, local subdivision regulations. emergency operation plans, and a local hazard The process of developing the plan has been as mitigation plan approved by FEMA. Under changes to important as the plan itself, by drawing the community state planning law (24 V.S.A. Chapter 117), as of July 2014, all comprehensive plans must include a “flood together to identify and agree on actions to be taken to reduce and mitigate hazards. The four parts of the resilience” element that may reference a locally planning process included: adopted and FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan. Public Involvement – to receive and consider This plan represents a complete rewrite of the previous community-wide input from diverse stakeholders. Tunbridge Annex, as a standalone, single jurisdiction Risk Assessment – to identify and plan for the most hazard mitigation plan that updates and builds upon probable hazards, estimate the potential frequency previous mitigation plans, and augments the recently and magnitude of hazard events, and their readopted 2013 Tunbridge Town Plan. The planning potential impacts on both the built environment process resulting in this update was part of a FEMA- and the local community. funded Hazard Mitigation Planning Grant awarded Mitigation Strategies – to develop goals, objectives post-Irene to: and strategies aimed at mitigating future disaster strengthen community involvement in hazard losses that are cost-effective, technically feasible, mitigation planning, and environmentally sound – and timed to allow for better incorporate social and economic strategic investment of scarce resources. considerations, Implementation and Monitoring – to identify which identify and address manmade as well as natural actions will be taken by whom and by when. hazards, and to better integrate local comprehensive and hazard mitigation planning. 2 | Page TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN This plan reflects local priorities for hazard mitigation, as Action items are included to monitor the success or determined from the community planning process, and effectiveness of implementation and results, to inform currently available federal, state and local information. the next update of the plan. TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Page | 3 2. COMMUNITY PROFILE Topography and Drainage. The Town of Tunbridge, consisting of approximately 45 square miles or 28,665 acres, is situated on the First Branch of the White River in Orange County, Vermont. Neighboring towns include Randolph, Chelsea, Strafford, Royalton, and Bethel. The town’s highest peak, at 2,120 feet, is Brocklebank Hill near Chelsea. Other high points include Old Hurricane Hill (1,920 feet) at the northern end of the ridge running along the town’s western border, and East Hill (1,544 feet) just east of Tunbridge Village. The First Branch drops 200 feet as it flows south through town, from an elevation of 700 feet at the northern border, to a low of 500 feet where it crosses the southern town line. Vermont Route 110 (VT 110) following the river is the main route in and out of town. Strafford Road, running over the eastern ridge, is the other major road in town. Local roads generally follow tributaries of the First Branch into the surrounding hills. Much of the terrain outside of the river floodplain is hilly Tunbridge is a quiet Vermont town, surrounded by a and fairly steep. mixture of large open fields and tracts of woodlands. Development within Tunbridge Village and North Development Pattern. Tunbridge is a rural community Tunbridge Village is typical of small New England villages. with three distinct centers located along VT 110 Buildings are built close together, with minimal setbacks including the small hamlet of South Tunbridge and from the road. In areas outside Tunbridge’s villages, larger villages of Tunbridge and North Tunbridge. South development is much more diffuse, and has taken place along Tunbridge’s dirt roads, leaving much of the land Tunbridge includes a few homes and a church. The open. –- 2013 Tunbridge Town Plan. centrally-located village of Tunbridge sits on a bluff 4 | Page TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN overlooking the Tunbridge Fairgrounds, which are Tunbridge Village,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vermont Victim Services Resource Directory
    R E 2 V IS 0 E U.S. Department of Justice D 1 E D 5 United States Attorney’s Office IT IO N Vermont Victim Services Resource Directory “Advocacy with Heart” DISTRIBUTED BY: United States Department of Justice United States Attorney’s Office District of Vermont United States Courthouse and Federal Building 11 Elmwood Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 951-6725 © Copyright 2015 by United States Attorney’s Office *Revised Edition U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney’s Office Vermont Victim Services Resource Directory 2015 ii iii T­ able­of­Contents Toll-Free­Resources­and­Information­Lines ................................................................1 Vermont­County­Listings: Addison County ......................................................................................................15 Bennington County ................................................................................................21 Caledonia County ..................................................................................................27 Chittenden County ................................................................................................33 Essex County ..........................................................................................................47 Franklin County ......................................................................................................51 Grand Isle County ..................................................................................................57 Lamoille County ....................................................................................................63
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Washington, VT Hazard Mitigation Plan September, 2011
    Town of Washington, VT Hazard Mitigation Plan September, 2011 Prepared by the Town of Washington and CVRPC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Community Profile .............................................................................................................................. 2 4. Planning Process and Maintenance ................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Planning Process ............................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Plan Maintenance .............................................................................................................................. 5 5. Risk Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 5 5.1 Hazard Identification and Analysis .................................................................................................. 5 Dam Failure ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Flooding/Flash Flooding .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Draft) Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan
    (DRAFT) TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Adopted by Selectboard:___________________ Formally Approved by FEMA: __________________ TUNBRIDGE, VERMONT 2020-25 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Tunbridge Planning Commission Laura Ginsburg, Chair Nancy Chapman Brenda Field Gary Mullen, Ex Officio Izzy Provoncha Daniel Ruddell Janet Wells Shane Young Tunbridge Selectboard Gary Mullen, Chair Mike McPhetres, Vice Chair John O’Brien, Clerk Planning Support Jessica Richter Two Rivers-Ottauquechee Regional Commission Technical Support Daniel Ruddell Tunbridge Lister, Floodplain Administrator Simon Bradford, Chief Tunbridge Volunteer Fire Department Rodney Hoyt Tunbridge Road Foreman Cover Art "Tunbridge, VT 1941" by David Wright http://www.nostalgia-usa.com/ Used with permission of the artist. ii | Page TUNBRIDGE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CERTIFICATE OF PLAN ADOPTION Town of Tunbridge Selectboard Formal Resolution Adopting the 2020-2025 Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan WHEREAS, the Town of Tunbridge has worked with local officials, residents and regional partners to identify hazards, analyze past and potential future losses due to natural and manmade-caused disasters, to identify strategies for mitigating future losses, and to prepare an updated hazard mitigation plan for the town; and WHEREAS, a duly-noticed public meeting was held by the Tunbridge Selectboard on Month X, 2020 to present and receive public comment on the draft 2020-2025 Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, the updated 2020-2025 Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan was submitted to the Vermont Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security and received for review at the Federal Emergency Management Agency on Month, X, 2020; and WHEREAS, after several requested revisions, FEMA approved the updated 2020-2025 Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan on ___________________, pending adoption by the Tunbridge Selectboard; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Tunbridge Selectboard hereby adopts this 2020-2025 Tunbridge Hazard Mitigation Plan for municipal use and implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Vermont Superior Court Secretary, Vermont
    STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. SECRETARY, VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Plaintiff v. BRIAN BLAKEMAN AND KYLE BLAKEMAN d/b/a BLAKEMAN'S TOWING AND RECOVERY, Respondents ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER Having found that Brian Blakeman and Kyle Blakeman d/b/a Blakeman's Towing and Recovery (Respondents) have committed violations as defined in 10 V.S.A. §8002(9), the Secretary (Secretary) of the Agency of Natural Resources (Agency), pursuant to the authority set forth in 10 V.S.A. §8008, hereby issues the following Administrative Order: VIOLATIONS 1. 24 V.S.A. §2242(a)(2): Operation of a salvage yard without a Certificate of Registration (COR). 2. 24 V.S.A. §2257(a): Failure to screen salvage yard from public view. 3. Land Use Permit (LUP) #3R0897, Condition 1: Failure to maintain a gate on the vertical board fence as required. 4. Hazardous Waste Management Regulations (HWMR) §7-3ll(a)(l): Failure to store lead-acid batteries under cover on an impervious surface. 5. LUP #3R0897, Condition 2 and Natural Resources Board (NRB) Rule 34(A): Failure to obtain a Land Use Permit Amendment prior to a material change to the pe1mitted project. 6. 10 V.S.A. §6616, HWMR §7-302(c) and §7-803(i): Release of hazardous material into surface or groundwater, or onto the land of the state. 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. Respondents own property located at 143 Vermont Route 110 in Tunbridge, Vermont with SPAN #65720710242 (the Tunbridge property). 2. Respondents operate an automobile towing and recovery service, known as Blakeman's Towing and Recovery on the Tunbridge property.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Washington, VT Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Created August 2013 – Adopted April 2014 Prepared by the Town of Washington and CVPRC
    Town Of Washington, VT Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Created August 2013 – Adopted April 2014 Prepared by the Town of Washington and CVPRC 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Community Profile ................................................................................................................................ 2 4. Planning Process and Maintenance ...................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Planning Process ................................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 Plan Maintenance ............................................................................................................................... 5 5. Community Vulnerability by Hazard ..................................................................................................... 6 5.1 Hazard Identification ........................................................................................................................... 6 5.2 Worst Threat Hazards ......................................................................................................................... 8 Dam Failure ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Derby-West Charleston Transmission Lines
    HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, HANDS MILL DAM (VT STATE ID #225.01) REMOVAL PROJECT WASHINGTON, ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT Detail of a postcard entitled “Washington Vt. from George Bohonon’s.” Courtesy of the Vermont Historical Society, Leahy Library, Barre, Vermont Kate Kenny and Catherine A. Quinn University of Vermont Consulting Archaeology Program 111 Delehanty Hall 180 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05405 UVM Report No. 1303 December 16, 2020 HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, HANDS MILL DAM (VT STATE ID #225.01) REMOVAL PROJECT WASHINGTON, ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT Submitted to: Gianna Petito, District Manager Winooski Natural Resources Conservation District 617 Comstock Road, Suite 1 Berlin, Vermont 05602 Submitted by: Kate Kenny and Catherine A. Quinn University of Vermont Consulting Archaeology Program 111 Delehanty Hall 180 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05405 UVM Report No. 1303 December 16, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ ii PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................................... 6 HISTORIC BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 7 Saw Mill .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Benefit-Cost Analysis Report DRAFT
    December 4, 2020 To: Gianna Petito, District Manager, Winooski Natural Resources Conservation District From: Meghan Arpino, Gabe Bolin, PE, Stone MEMO Environmental, Inc. Stone Project No. 20-007 Subject: Hands Mill Dam Removal – BCA Analysis Memo Stone Environmental, Inc. (Stone) has completed a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) as part of the Hands Mill Dam Removal 30% design effort. This memo provides a summary of the analysis, along with a BCA report and supporting documentation, that can be used as part of a larger grant application submission by the Winooski Natural Resources Conservation District (District) to the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for funding to support future project phases. The BCA is a method developed by FEMA that compares risk reduction benefits of a hazard mitigation project to its costs. The result is a Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR), where a project is considered cost-effective when the BCR is at or greater than 1.0. To establish cost-effectiveness of a project, those that are applying to FEMA for project funding are required to use FEMA methodologies and tools. Stone used the FEMA BCA Toolkit, Version 6.0 (https://www.fema.gov/grants/guidance-tools/benefit-cost-analysis) for this analysis. The following sections provide an explanation of details and assumptions of the analysis. Relevant supporting documents are provided as attachments to this memo. 1. Analysis Methodology and Assumptions The overall analysis includes two mitigation actions, 1) mitigation at the dam property itself, including dam removal and 2) mitigation of impacts to the residential property at 16 Woodchuck Hollow Road, which is located at the intersection of West Corinth Road and Woodchuck Hollow Road, immediately adjacent to the dam property.
    [Show full text]
  • Derby-West Charleston Transmission Lines
    HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, HANDS MILL DAM (VT STATE ID #225.01) REMOVAL PROJECT WASHINGTON, ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT Detail of a postcard entitled “Washington Vt. from George Bohonon’s.” Courtesy of the Vermont Historical Society, Leahy Library, Barre, Vermont Kate Kenny and Catherine A. Quinn University of Vermont Consulting Archaeology Program 111 Delehanty Hall 180 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05405 UVM Report No. 1303 December 8, 2020 HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, HANDS MILL DAM (VT STATE ID #225.01) REMOVAL PROJECT WASHINGTON, ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT Submitted to: Gianna Petito, District Manager Winooski Natural Resources Conservation District 617 Comstock Road, Suite 1 Berlin, Vermont 05602 Submitted by: Kate Kenny and Catherine A. Quinn University of Vermont Consulting Archaeology Program 111 Delehanty Hall 180 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05405 UVM Report No. 1303 December 8, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ ii PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................................... 6 HISTORIC BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 7 Saw Mill .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]