DOCSLIB.ORG

University of California, Irvine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Aquinas and Later Scholastics on Willful Wrongdoing DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Philosophy by Ashley Dressel Dissertation Committee: Professor Bonnie Kent, Chair Professor Sean Greenberg Professor Casey Perin Professor Martin Schwab 2014 © 2014 Ashley Dressel DEDICATION To Matt For your boundless support and unconditional love. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION x INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Aquinas on Willful Wrongdoing and Vice 4 1. The Pursuit of Happiness and the Guise of the Good 8 2. Sinning from malitia 9 3. Clear-eyed Evil 14 4. Clear-eyed Evil and the Socratic Thesis 17 5. Corrupt States 22 6. Challenges for the Clear-eyed Evil Account of Vice 36 Conclusion 45 CHAPTER 2: Aquinas on Willful Wrongdoing in the Absence of Vice 46 1. Hope of Heaven and Fear of Hell 47 2. Despair, Presumption, and Clear-eyed Wrongdoing 53 3. Despair, Presumption and the Socratic Thesis 58 4. Despair as an Instance of Willful Wrongdoing 62 5. What Has Jerusalem to do with Athens? 74 Conclusion 75 CHAPTER 3: Error in the Intellect and Evil in the Will: Capreolus and Cajetan on 77 Willful Wrongdoing 1. 1277 78 2. John Capreolus: The Prince of the Thomists 82 i. Ultimate Particular Conscience 85 ii. Ignorance, Inconsiderationis, and Disordered Willing 91 iii. Prudence and malitia 95 3. Thomas Cajetan 97 i. Willful Wrongdoing and Comparative Particular Judgments 98 iii ii. Evil in the Will 103 Conclusion 111 CHAPTER 4: Suárez on the Moral Necessity of Ignorance in Evil 113 1. The State of the Texts 117 2. Suárez on Willful Wrongdoing 118 3. Suárez on the Socratic Thesis 123 4. Moral Necessity 132 Conclusion 137 BIBLIOGRAPHY 139 iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Works by Aquinas In Iob Expositio super Iob ad Litteram (Commentary on Job) In NE Sententiae libri Ethicorum (Commentary on Aristotle's Ethics) In Sent. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum (Commentary on the Sentences) QDV Quaestiones de veritate (Disputed Questions on the Truth) QDVC Quaestiones de virtutibus in communi (Disputed Questions on Virtue) QDM Quaestiones disputatae de malo (Disputed Questions on Evil) ST Summa Theologiae Works by Suárez DA De Angelis (On the Angels) DFH De Fine Hominis (On the Human End) DM Disputationes Metaphysicae (Metaphysical Disputations) DS De Spe (On Hope) DVP De Vitiis et Peccatis (On Vices and Sins) Works by Other Authors EN Nichomachean Ethics DDT Defensiones Theologiae Divi Thomae Aquinatis (Capreolus) CST Commentaria in Summam Theologiae St Thomae (Cajetan) v General Abbreviations a. article ad. reply to an objection arg. argument c. around disp. disputation dist. distinction lib. book obj. objection q. question sect. section Citation Style References to Aquinas's works cite the abbreviation for the work (ST, for instance, for the Summa), the part of the work in which the reference is found (I-II, for example, refers to Aquinas's Prima Secundae), then the relevant question within that part of the work. Finally, if applicable, these references cite the numbers of both the relevant article within that question and reply to an objection within that article. References to Capreolus’s Defensiones follow a similar schema, citing the abbreviation for the work (DDT), the book under consideration, distinction number, and then the numbers corresponding to the relevant question and article. Since an article can be rather lengthy, citations also indicate the section within the article under consideration and, if applicable, a particular argument. Finally, I have included reference to the place each citation can be found in the Paban and Pègues edition of the text. The format for these citations is volume number, page number, then column (a or b). References to Cajetan’s work cite the abbreviation for the work (CST), the location of the reference within the Summa, and a Roman numeral indicating the section of Cajetan’s commentary as it appears in the Leonine edition. Finally, references to Suárez’s work cite the abbreviation for the work, as well as the relevant book, then chapter, then paragraph number within that work as noted in the Vivés edition. This citation is followed by reference to the place each citation can be found in the Vivés edition of Suárez’s Opera Omnia: volume, page number, and then column. vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Bonnie, my Doktormutter. Thank you for your guidance, mercy, and generous mentorship. I will miss our conversations and I anticipate that your work will always be the unattainable standard against which I measure my own. Thank you to Sean Greenberg, Casey Perin, and Martin Schwab for your feedback over the years, for the discussions that have helped me to think through this nest of issues, and for your continued support and guidance. I am indebted to those who, through workshops and conferences, aided in the development the first two chapters of this work. Special thanks are due to Calvin Normore and Owen Goldin for providing me opportunities to present my work. I would also like to thank John Carriero, Brian Copenhaver, Gavin Lawrence, Colleen McCluskey, and Richard Taylor for particularly insightful questions and remarks. I owe a great deal to Nathan Goetting, Mark Pestana, and Peggy Vandenberg. Your philosophical clarity, earnestness, and passion inspired me to take this journey. I have never regretted it. I am immensely grateful to those anonymous members of the academic community who painstakingly scan thousands of pages of arcane texts into free-use databases. Because of you, I will be able to do serious scholarly work no matter where my academic journey takes me. Thank you to my parents, Brian and Karen Comstock, who have always trusted me enough to encourage me to succeed doing what I love. Thank you, April, for ensuring I take breaks filled with bubbles, stories, laughter and fun. Finally, thank you, Matt, my partner and best friend, for your love, support, insight, and sacrifice. vii CURRICULUM VITAE Ashley Dressel EDUCATION University of California, Irvine Ph.D., Philosophy, July 2014 University of California, Irvine M.A., Philosophy (with Distinction), 2011 Grand Valley State University B.A., Philosophy, magna cum laude, Honors College, 2008 Dissertation: Aquinas and Later Scholastics on Willful Wrongdoing Committee: Bonnie Kent (chair), Sean Greenberg, Casey Perin, and Martin Schwab AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Medieval Philosophy; Early Modern Philosophy; History of Ethics AREAS OF COMPETENCE Ancient Philosophy; Ethics; Moral Psychology AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS (excludes travel grants) President's Dissertation Year Fellowship, University of California, 2013 Summer Dissertation Fellowship, University of California, Irvine, 2013 Kavka Prize in Philosophy, University of California, Irvine, 2012 Machette Foundation Award for Philosophy, University of California, Irvine, 2011 Abraham Melden Fellowship, University of California, Irvine 2008 Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society, invited 2006 PUBLICATIONS 'Weakness and Willful Wrongdoing in Aquinas's De Malo', for The Cambridge Critical Guide to Aquinas' “On Evil” (co-authorship with Bonnie Kent; forthcoming) 'Aquinas on Evil and Sin', for the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (forthcoming) 'Directed Obligations and Deathbed Promises' in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice PRESENTATIONS May 2014 'A Road to Sin: Aquinas on Despair'; International Congress on Medieval Studies, St. Thomas Aquinas Society sponsored session, Kalamazoo, MI. April 2014 'Aquinas on Vice and Clear-eyed Evil'; UCLA History Workshop, Los Angeles, CA. June 2013 'How A Virtuous Person Might Come to Sin on Purpose: Aquinas on Willful Wrongdoing'; Marquette Summer Seminar on Aristotle and the Aristotelian Tradition, Milwaukee, WI. March 2013 Commentary on Joseph Anderson's 'Scotus on Omnipotence and the viii Disunity of the Sciences'; APA Pacific, San Francisco, CA. February 2013 'Sinning From “Malice”: Aquinas on Willful Wrongdoing'; MaRSA Annual Conference, Long Beach, CA. June 2011 'Agent-relative Norms and Aquinas's Natural Law'; Lumen Christi Institute Summer Seminar, Chicago, IL. TEACHING University of California, Irvine Teaching Associate (planned course, lectured, supervised TAs) Phil 5 Contemporary Moral Problems, Spring 2013 Phil 10 Ancient Philosophy, Summer 2012 Instructor (set syllabus, lectured, graded) WR 39C Argument and Research, Winter 2013 (theme: Urban Planning) WR 39B Critical Reading and Rhetoric, Fall 2012 (theme: Parody/Satire) WR 39B Critical Reading and Rhetoric, Winter 2011 (theme: Parody/Satire) Teaching Assistant Rel Std 5C Inter-religious Dialogue, Spring 2012 Phil 11 Medieval Philosophy, Winter 2011 Phil 5 Contemporary Moral Problems, Spring 2010 Phil 5 Contemporary Moral Problems, Fall 2009 Phil 4 Introduction to Ethics, Spring 2011 Phil 4 Introduction to Ethics, Winter 2010 Phil 1 Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2010 Grand Valley State University Teaching Apprentice (responsible for study sessions and some class sessions) Introduction to Logic, Winter 2007 Modern Great Philosophers, Fall 2006 Muskegon Correctional Facility Instructor (responsible for all aspects of course design and execution) Intro to Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Winter 2007 Modern Moral Philosophy, Fall 2006 SERVICE Conference Co-chair: “Gender: Equity, Equality, and Diversity”, October 2014 Chair for an Author-Meets-Critics session at the APA Pacific, April 2014 UCI Philosophy Department Graduate Student Mentor 2013-2014 UCI
Recommended publications
  • Divine Causality and Created Freedom: a Thomistic Personalist View

    Divine Causality and Created Freedom: a Thomistic Personalist View

    Nova et Vetera, English Edition, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2016): 919–963 919 Divine Causality and Created Freedom: A Thomistic Personalist View Mark K. Spencer University of St. Thomas Saint Paul, Minnesota Thomas Aquinas argues that God causes all beings other than himself and moves all of them to all their acts, including causing us and moving us to our free acts.1 This claim is connected to the set of issues surrounding the relation between created freedom and divine providence, predestination, and grace. A strong defender of the free- dom of created persons, such as a Thomistic personalist, might reject this aspect of Aquinas’s account and contend that to be free is to be “lord of one’s acts” (dominus sui actus).2 By this, the personalist would understand that the created free person is the ultimate determinant3 of whether he or she acts (I refer to this, following the Thomistic tradition, as the “exercise” of the act) and of what he or she does in those acts (the “content” or “specification” of the act). Throughout this article, I shall refer to the last sentence as the “personalist thesis” 1 Aquinas, Expositio libri Peryermeneias (hereafter, In Ph) I, lec. 14; Quaestiones disputatae de malo (hereafter, DM), q. 3, aa. 1–2; q. 6, a. un.; Quaestiones disputatae de potentia Dei (hereafter, DP), q. 3, aa. 5 and 7; Summa contra gentiles (hereafter, SCG) III, chs. 65 and 67; Summa Theologiae (hereafter, ST) I, q. 22, a. 2, ad 2; q. 104, a. 1; q. 105, aa. 4–5; I-II, q.
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As

    The Development of Marian Doctrine As

    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
  • Solidarity and Mediation in the French Stream Of

    Solidarity and Mediation in the French Stream Of

    SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Timothy R. Gabrielli Dayton, Ohio December 2014 SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor _________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Anthony J. Godzieba, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Vincent J. Miller, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Timothy R. Gabrielli All rights reserved 2014 iii ABSTRACT SOLIDARITY MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. In its analysis of mystical body of Christ theology in the twentieth century, this dissertation identifies three major streams of mystical body theology operative in the early part of the century: the Roman, the German-Romantic, and the French-Social- Liturgical. Delineating these three streams of mystical body theology sheds light on the diversity of scholarly positions concerning the heritage of mystical body theology, on its mid twentieth-century recession, as well as on Pope Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi, which enshrined “mystical body of Christ” in Catholic magisterial teaching. Further, it links the work of Virgil Michel and Louis-Marie Chauvet, two scholars remote from each other on several fronts, in the long, winding French stream.
  • Johann Tetzel in Order to Pay for Expanding His Authority to the Electorate of Mainz

    Johann Tetzel in Order to Pay for Expanding His Authority to the Electorate of Mainz

    THE IMAGE OF A FRACTURED CHURCH AT 500 YEARS CURATED BY DR. ARMIN SIEDLECKI FEB 24 - JULY 7, 2017 THE IMAGE OF A FRACTURED CHURCH AT 500 YEARS Five hundred years ago, on October 31, 1517, Martin Luther published his Ninety-Five Theses, a series of statements and proposals about the power of indulgences and the nature of repentance, forgiveness and salvation. Originally intended for academic debate, the document quickly gained popularity, garnering praise and condemnation alike, and is generally seen as the beginning of the Protestant Reformation. This exhibit presents the context of Martin Luther’s Theses, the role of indulgences in sixteenth century religious life and the use of disputations in theological education. Shown also are the early responses to Luther’s theses by both his supporters and his opponents, the impact of Luther’s Reformation, including the iconic legacy of Luther’s actions as well as current attempts by Catholics and Protestants to find common ground. Case 1: Indulgences In Catholic teaching, indulgences do not effect the forgiveness of sins but rather serve to reduce the punishment for sins that have already been forgiven. The sale of indulgences was initially intended to defray the cost of building the Basilica of St. Peter in Rome and was understood as a work of charity, because it provided monetary support for the church. Problems arose when Albert of Brandenburg – a cardinal and archbishop of Magdeburg – began selling indulgences aggressively with the help of Johann Tetzel in order to pay for expanding his authority to the Electorate of Mainz. 2 Albert of Brandenburg, Archbishop of Mainz Unused Indulgence (Leipzig: Melchior Lotter, 1515?) 1 sheet ; 30.2 x 21 cm.
  • Cajetan's Economic Treatises

    Cajetan's Economic Treatises

    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 18, Number 2 (Fall 2015): 349–371 Copyright © 2015 Cajetan’s Economic Treatises A Critique of Rothbard’s Philip Neri Reese Proto-Austrian Portrayal Providence College Although Murray Rothbard gave high praise to the economic teachings of Thomas de Vio Cardinal Cajetan, portraying him as proto-Austrian, this article argues that the reality is more complicated. Examining Cajetan’s three major economic works, On Monetary Exchange, On Charitable Pawnshops, and On Usury, it demonstrates that he could be in turn liberal, moderate, and conservative, depending on the particular context and question. It concludes that read within his own scholastic and pastoral approach, Cajetan may still have insights and contributions to offer the history of economics, but of a more mixed character than Rothbard’s portrayal. Introduction In his 1995 Economic Thought Before Adam Smith, Murray Rothbard was not shy about praising the economic teachings of Thomas de Vio Cardinal Cajetan, who lived from 1468 to 1534. Rothbard titled the second section of chapter 4 “Cardinal Cajetan: Liberal Thomist,” and thereby gave de Vio the laurel of being “the founder of expectations theory in economics.” Twice Rothbard referred to the cardinal as “the great Cajetan,” and he insisted that Cajetan’s “candid endorsement of upward mobility in a free market was the broadest attempt yet to rid scholasticism of all traces of the ancient contempt for trade and economic gain.”1 When reading such descriptions, it is difficult to avoid forming an image of Cardinal Cajetan as a sort of proto-Austrian, and we have every reason to think that this was the impression Rothbard strove to give.
  • German Inter-Monastic Politics and the Reformation of the Sixteenth Century 115

    German Inter-Monastic Politics and the Reformation of the Sixteenth Century 115

    German inter-monastic politics and the Reformation of the sixteenth century 115 German inter-monastic politics and the Reformation of the sixteenth century Rev Dr Mark W Worthing Mark Worthing, Dr Phil, Dr Theol, is a pastor of the LCA. After parish ministry in Adelaide, he taught in the field of historical and systematic theology at the former Luther Seminary, Adelaide, then at Tabor-Adelaide, and now serves as senior researcher with the research arm of Australian Lutheran College, the Australian Lutheran Institute for Theology and Ethics (ALITE). The story is well known among Protestants. When Pope Leo X learned of the dispute surrounding Luther’s 95 theses he mistakenly dismissed it as a monastic squabble.1 There is strong evidence, however, that while the Reformation of the sixteenth century proved to be ultimately much more than a monastic dispute, in its earliest phases much of what occurred can best be understood in light of the complexities of the inter-monastic rivalry between the Augustinians and Dominicans. The Augustinian movement Two types of Augustinians emerged during the medieval period: the Order of Canons Regular, who were largely clergy connected to specific churches or cathedrals; and the Augustinian hermits, who were a true monastic order.2 In the fifteenth century a split occurred within the Hermit tradition between ‘observant’ congregations that sought reform through strict adherence to the Rule, and the ‘conventuals’, who sought to interpret the Rule more flexibly.3 The monastery Luther entered was the Erfurt Observant Congregation of Augustinian Hermits.4 The philosophical and theological gulf between Augustinians and Dominicans The rediscovery of Aristotle in the West prompted the two greatest theologians of the Dominican Order, Albertus Magnus and his student Thomas Aquinas, to develop an 1 Cf.
  • Cloister Chronicle 227

    Cloister Chronicle 227

    • St. Joseph's Province • Condolences The Fathers and Brothers of the Province extend their sympathy and prayers to the Rev. M. P. James, O.P., and the Rev. ]. G. Curley, O .P., on the death of their fathers ; to Bro. D . L. Tancrell, O.P., on the death of his mother; to the Revs. W . A. and J. F. Hinnebusch, O.P., and Bros. B. Hughes, O.P., and B. Boyd, O.P., on the death of their brothers; and to the Very Rev. F. A.. Gordon, O.P., and ]. T. McKenna, O.P., on the death of their sisters. Ordi nations In the Church of Saint Dominic in Washington, D. C., on the Feast of Corpus Christi, June 5th,. 1958, Jesus Christ, The Eternal High Priest, in His Infinite Goodness and through . the hands of His Servant, The Most Reverend Amleto G. Cicognani, Apostolic Delegate to the United States, or­ dained the following to share fo rever in the glory of the Dominican Priesthood: Fathers Fred Valerian LaFrance, Thomas Finbar Carroll, Warren Bede Dennis, William Leonard Smith, Hector Ronald Henery, Thomas Joachim Cunningham, Joseph Giles Pezzullo, Robert Fidelis McKenna, Leroy Ceslaus Hoinacki, Daniel Thaddeus Davies, Robert Emmanuel Bertrand, Joseph Brian Morris, Thomas Ber­ nard Smith, Richard Raphael Archer, Michael Matthias Caprio, Francis Matthew ~elley, John Stephen Fitzhenry, William Cyprian Cenkner; Daniel Antoninus Mc­ Caffrey, Stephen Kieran Smith, George Lawrence Concordia, Thomas Cajetan Kelly and Gerald Owen O"Connor. Professions Two Laybrothers made profession and two received the Dominican & Yeslition habit at €eremonies held recently in the Priory Church of St.
  • 1 the Many Virtues of Second Nature: Habitus in Latin Medieval Philosophy Nicolas Faucher1 and Magali Roques2 Abstract

    1 the Many Virtues of Second Nature: Habitus in Latin Medieval Philosophy Nicolas Faucher1 and Magali Roques2 Abstract

    The Many Virtues of Second Nature: Habitus in Latin Medieval Philosophy Nicolas Faucher1 and Magali Roques2 Abstract: This chapter consists of a systematic introduction to the nature and function of habitus in Latin medieval philosophy. Over the course of this introduction, several topics are treated: the theoretical necessity to posit habitus; their nature; their causal contribution to the production of internal and external acts; how and why habitus can grow and decay; what makes their unity when they can have multiple objects and work in clusters. Finally, we examine two specific questions: why intellectual habitus represent a special case that triggered considerable debate; how human beings can be said to be free if their actions are determined by moral habitus. Keywords: habitus, disposition, philosophical psychology, metaphysics of the soul, moral philosophy, medieval philosophy. The present volume is dedicated to the concept of habitus in medieval philosophy. Its purpose is to assess the actual importance of this notion for medieval thinkers, in light of recent advances in medieval cognitive psychology and medieval moral theory, which have been the object of sustained attention in the last ten years. To our knowledge, there have been only two extensive studies on the history of the concept of habitus from Aristotle to the twentieth century. The first is the habilitation thesis of Peter Nickl (2001).3 The other is a volume of collected papers edited by Tom Sparrow and Adam Hutchinson (2013).4 To date, only a few monographs have been published on this notion, focused on specific authors: Oswald Fuchs’s thorough but dated study of the psychology of habitus in William of Ockham (1952); Rolf Darge’s authoritative monograph (1996) on the knowledge of habitus and the 1 Centre of Excellence in Reason and Religious Recognition, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Theology, Vuorikatu 3, 00100, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Natural Theology and Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance

    Natural Theology and Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance

    Natural theology and natural philosophy in the late Renaissance Thomas Woolford Trinity College This dissertation is submitted to the University of Cambridge for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2011 Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated in the text. This dissertation is also not substantially the same as any that I have submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at any other University. The length of this dissertation is under 80,000 words. Thomas A. Woolford November 2011 i Acknowledgements Many thanks to the Arts and Humanities Research Council for providing a studentship bursary to enable me to undertake research and to Cambridge University, Trinity College and the School of Humanities for providing an outstanding work environment. I am most grateful for the support, guidance, encouragement and friendship of my supervisor Richard Serjeantson. I’d also like to mention here friends and family who have cared for and supported me: my wonderful wife Julie, Dad, sister Kim, brother-in-law Doug, brother Sam, parents-in-law Margaret and James, friends Tim, Alex, Jon and Chrissy, and our hospitable neighbours Christine and David. To fulfil a twenty-year-old promise, this is dedicated to my cousins Alison and David, but they have to share the dedication with my late mother, Mary. SDG ii Natural theology and natural philosophy in the late Renaissance T. A. Woolford Despite some great strides in relating certain areas of Christian doctrine to the study of the natural world, the category ‘natural theology’ has often been subject to anachronism and misunderstanding.
  • Friars' Bookshelf: Saint Benedict and His Times. by Ildephonse Cardinal

    Friars' Bookshelf: Saint Benedict and His Times. by Ildephonse Cardinal

    Friars' Bookshelf 73 book, or for making a weary translation of a work deserving better treatment. The chapters are copiously ladened with very valuable in­ formation about important men and their work on behalf of the Church which was so sorely beset by heterodox influences from within and without her ranks, but the presentation is so haggard that only the most ardent liturgical enrage could survive the ordeal for more than a few pages. If any potential reader is in hopes of finding a com­ petent account of modern progress in the liturgy, we bid him carry on his quest. L.K. Saint Benedict and His Times. By lldephonse Cardinal Schuster, O.S.B., Archbishop of Milan. Translated by Gregory J. Roettger, O.S.B. With a preface by Rt. Rev. Alcuin Deutsch, O.S.B. St. Louis, B. Herder, 1951. pp. 392. $6.00. The difficulty involved in writing the life of St. Benedict is pretty commonly recognized. Civilization owes to him and to his sons an enormous debt, but of the Patriarch himself we know precious little. Pere Lagrange steadfastly refused all his life to write a "life" of Christ. He believed it was impossible in the face of the meager knowledge we possess of Christ's life among men. Yet the biographer of Our Saviour has vastly more to work with than the biographer of St. Benedict. Excepting the Rule itself, which indirectly testifies to the character of the man who wrote it, all we know of the life of Benedict for certain is what we read in the pious account of the miracles of St.
  • Reformation Theology

    Reformation Theology

    REFORMATION THEOLOGY REFORMATION THEOLOGY A READER OF PRIMARY SOURCES WITH INTRODUCTIONS Edited by Bradford Littlejohn with Jonathan Roberts Copyright © 2017 The Davenant Institute All rights reserved. ISBN: 0999552704 ISBN-13: 978-0999552704 Front cover image taken from Hermann Wislicenus, Luther vor Karl V. auf dem Reichstag zu Worms 1521 (1880; Imperial Palace of Goslar) Cover design by Rachel Rosales, Orange Peal Design Dedicated to the memory of the 16th-century martyrs who gave their lives for truth and the glory of God TABLE OF CONTENTS General Introduction iii About this Edition xii 1 Boniface VIII, Clericis Laicos (1296) and Unam Sanctam (1302) 1 2 Marsilius of Padua, Defender of the Peace (1324), excerpts 11 3 John Wycliffe, Trialogus (1384), Bk. IV, chs. 2–6 (on the Eu- 24 charist) 4 The Council of Constance, Sacrosancta (1414) and Frequens 47 (1417) 5 John Hus, On the Church (1413), chs. 1–3, 10 60 6 Desiderius Erasmus, Julius Excluded from Heaven (1517), excerpt 95 7 Martin Luther, Ninety-Five Theses (1517) 117 8 Martin Luther, A Letter to the Christian Nobility of the German 130 Nation (1520), Introduction and The Three Walls of the Ro- manists 9 Martin Luther, The Babylonian Captivity of the Church (1520), The 148 Sacrament of the Altar 10 Pope Leo X, Exsurge Domine (1520) 181 11 Martin Luther, The Freedom of a Christian (1520) 195 12 Michael Sattler, The Schleitheim Articles (1527) 236 13 Thomas More, A Dialogue Concerning Heresies (1529), Bk. I, chs. 245 19-23 14 Philipp Melanchthon, Apology of the Augsburg Confession (1531), 272 Article IV: Of Justification 15 Thomas Cajetan, Four Lutheran Errors (1531) 302 16 John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536/1559), Pref- 320 atory Address; Book I, chs.
  • Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: a History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Samuel A

    Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: a History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Samuel A

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Dayton University of Dayton eCommons Honors Theses University Honors Program 4-2016 Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Samuel A. Mullins University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses Part of the Biblical Studies Commons eCommons Citation Mullins, Samuel A., "Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14" (2016). Honors Theses. 146. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/146 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Honors Thesis Samuel Mullins Department: Religious Studies Advisor: Meghan Henning, Ph.D. April 2016 Typology, Tabernacle and Tradition: A History of Interpretation of Hebrews 9:11-14 Honors Thesis Samuel Mullins Department: Religious Studies Advisor: Meghan Henning, Ph.D. April 2016 Abstract The texts of the Bible have been used and interpreted in various ways across different time periods and different cultures, and there is much to be gained by studying these changes. Changing attitudes about and uses of Scripture tell us something about other changes taking place in society. They reflect new ideas about religion, knowledge, and authority. Most of all, they demonstrate the techniques used by pastors, theologians, and other authors to make texts written long ago relevant to contemporary problems.