Environmental Impact Assessment M2 Road Sarateni

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Impact Assessment M2 Road Sarateni ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT M2 SARATENI – S O R O C A – UNGURI MCC Moldova Roads Rehabilitation Program SUBMITTED TO Millennium Challenge Corporation SUBMITTED BY Nathan/URS/Universcons UNDER CONTRACT NO. MCC-06-0086-CON-90/TO1 NOVEMBER 23, 2009 Environmental Impact Assessment Moldova Road Improvements Project M2 Sarateni – Soroca - Unguri Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Scoping ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Policy, Legal, and Administrative Framework ......................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Baseline Data ............................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.5 Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.5.1 Protected Areas .................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5.2 Fisheries, Aquatic Ecology .................................................................................................. 1-3 1.5.3 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5.4 Forests .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5.5 Rare, Endangered Species.................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5.6 Animal Migration ................................................................................................................ 1-5 1.5.7 Natural Industry ................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5.8 Soil Erosion and Siltation .................................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.9 Local Flooding ..................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.10 Stream Channel Regime Changes ........................................................................................ 1-6 1.5.11 Landslides ............................................................................................................................ 1-6 1.5.12 Air Pollution ........................................................................................................................ 1-7 1.5.13 Noise .................................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.5.14 Surface Water and Groundwater Quality ............................................................................. 1-8 1.6 Socio-economic Impacts ........................................................................................................... 1-8 1.6.1 Potential Positive Impacts .................................................................................................... 1-8 1.6.2 Summary of Potential Negative Social Impacts ................................................................ 1-11 1.6.3 Human Trafficking, Drug Use, HIV/AIDS, and STIs ....................................................... 1-11 1.6.4 Traffic Safety ..................................................................................................................... 1-13 1.6.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................. 1-13 1.6.6 Potential Resettlement ....................................................................................................... 1-13 1.7 Transboundary Impacts ........................................................................................................... 1-14 1.8 Analysis of Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 1-14 1.8.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1-14 1.8.2 No Action ........................................................................................................................... 1-14 1.8.3 Alternative Concepts.......................................................................................................... 1-15 1.9 Environmental Management Plan ........................................................................................... 1-15 1.10 Consultation ............................................................................................................................ 1-16 1.11 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 1-16 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 2-1 3. METHODOLOOGY AND SCOPING ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Study Methodology ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Environmental Classification ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Approach .............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Summary of Scoping Process ................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 Scoping Meeting in Soroca (9 October 2008) ..................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 EIA Approach to Addressing Scoping Comments .............................................................. 3-3 M2 EIA – Moldova Road Improvements Project -- November 2009 i 4. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ............................................................................... 4-1 4.1 National Policy on Road Sector ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 National Policy on Environmental Protection........................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Moldovan Legislation and Administrative Framework ............................................................ 4-2 4.4 MCC Requirements .................................................................................................................. 4-8 4.5 Administrative Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 4-9 4.6 Environmental Impact Assessment ......................................................................................... 4-10 5. BASELINE DATA ................................................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Ecological Information ............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 Flora ..................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Fauna.................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.3 Sensitive Ecosystems and Habitats ...................................................................................... 5-4 5.1.4 Protected Areas .................................................................................................................... 5-5 5.2 Physical Background ................................................................................................................ 5-7 5.2.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................................. 5-7 5.2.2 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................ 5-8 5.2.3 Natural Disaster Risks ....................................................................................................... 5-11 5.2.4 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 5-14 5.2.5 Climate ............................................................................................................................... 5-15 5.2.6 Water Use .......................................................................................................................... 5-16 5.2.7 Traffic ................................................................................................................................ 5-17 5.2.8 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 5-18 5.2.9 Noise .................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Trials of the War Criminals
    TRIALS OF THE WAR CRIMINALS General Considerations The Fascist regime that ruled Romania between September 14, 1940, and August 23, 1944, was brought to justice in Bucharest in May 1946, and after a short trial, its principal leaders—Ion and Mihai Antonescu and two of their closest assistants—were executed, while others were sentenced to life imprisonment or long terms of detention. At that time, the trial’s verdicts seemed inevitable, as they indeed do today, derived inexorably from the defendants’ decisions and actions. The People’s Tribunals functioned for a short time only. They were disbanded on June 28, 1946,1 although some of the sentences were not pronounced until sometime later. Some 2,700 cases of suspected war criminals were examined by a commission formed of “public prosecutors,”2 but only in about half of the examined cases did the commission find sufficient evidence to prosecute, and only 668 were sentenced, many in absentia.3 There were two tribunals, one in Bucharest and one in Cluj. It is worth mentioning that the Bucharest tribunal sentenced only 187 people.4 The rest were sentenced by the tribunal in Cluj. One must also note that, in general, harsher sentences were pronounced by the Cluj tribunal (set up on June 22, 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă, “Introducere” in Procesul maresalului Antonescu (Bucharest: Saeculum and Europa Nova, 1995-98), vol. 1: p. 33. 2 The public prosecutors were named by communist Minister of Justice Lucret iu Pătrăşcanu and most, if not all of them were loyal party members, some of whom were also Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark, Roland. "Reaction." Sectarianism and Renewal in 1920S Romania: the Limits of Orthodoxy and Nation-Building
    Clark, Roland. "Reaction." Sectarianism and Renewal in 1920s Romania: The Limits of Orthodoxy and Nation-Building. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 77–85. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 24 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350100985.ch-004>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 24 September 2021, 21:07 UTC. Copyright © Roland Clark 2021. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 4 Reaction The process of unifying four different churches into a single patriarchate understandably caused some people to worry that something was being lost in the process. Tensions between metropolitans and bishops reflected dissatisfaction among parish clergy and laypeople as well, which in some cases resulted in the formation of new religious movements. As a society experiencing extraordinary social and political upheavals, including new borders, a nationalizing state, industrialization, new communication and transportation networks and new political ideologies, inter-war Romania was a fecund environment for religious innovation. With monasticism in decline and ever higher expectations being placed on both priests and laypeople, two of the most significant new religious movements of the period emerged in regions where monasticism and the monastic approach to spirituality had been strongest. The first, Inochentism, began in Bessarabia just before the First World War. Its apocalyptic belief that the end times were near included a strong criticism of the Church and the state, a critique that transferred smoothly onto the Romanian state and Orthodox Church once the region became part of Greater Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Consiliul Raional Soroca, Secţiile Şi Direcţiile Lui În Exercitarea
    Consiliul Raional Soroca, secţiile şi direcţiile lui în exercitarea atribuţiilor stabilite prin Legea administraţiei publice locale a acţionat în vederea implementării programelor şi strategiilor aprobate, a realizării sarcinilor şi atribuţiilor specifice, punând un accent sporit pe coordonarea activităţii serviciilor publice de interes raional, a autorităţilor administraţiei publice locale. La baza activităţii desfăşurate, a acţiunilor întreprinse şi a măsurilor stabilite, au stat îndeplinirea deciziilor Consiliului Raional, a obiectivelor cuprinse în programele şi strategiile aprobate prin deciziile Consiliului. Actele administrative adoptate şi emise pe parcursul anului 2017, eforturile depuse de Aparatul preşedintelui şi personalul din instituţiile aflate în subordine sau sub autoritatea autorităţii deliberative raionale au fost în concordanţa cu obiectivele stabilite. Pentru asigurarea şi susţinerea dezvoltării raionului, precum şi asigurarea durabilităii rezultatelor obţinute s-a activat la implementarea strategiei de dezvoltare a raionului pentru perioada anilor 2016-2020, cît şi a strategiilor elaborate şi adoptate pe domenii. Pe parcursul anului 2017, Consiliul Raional a asigurat executarea, monitorizarea şi evaluarea realizării deciziilor adoptate. De menţionat, că gradul de realizare a depins atît de resursele financiare disponibile şi atrase, cît şi, în mare măsură, de participarea tuturor actorilor la procesul de implementare, fiecare având responsabilităţi şi obiective clare, îndeplinind rolul de implementator sau de partener.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Moldova Stay on the Road to Europe
    MEMO POL I CY CAN MOLDOVA STAY ON THE ROAD TO EUROPE? Stanislav Secrieru SUMMARY In 2013 Russia hit Moldova hard, imposing Moldova is considered a success story of the European sanctions on wine exports and fuelling Union’s Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative. In the four separatist rumblings in Transnistria and years since a pro-European coalition came to power in 2009, Gagauzia. But 2014 will be much worse. Moldova has become more pluralist and has experienced Russia wants to undermine the one remaining “success story” of the Eastern Partnership robust economic growth. The government has introduced (Georgia being a unique case). It is not clear reforms and has deepened Moldova’s relations with the whether Moldova can rely on Ukraine as a EU, completing a visa-free action plan and initialling an buffer against Russian pressure, which is Association Agreement (AA) with provisions for a Deep and expected to ratchet up sharply after the Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA). At the start Sochi Olympics. Russia wants to change the Moldovan government at the elections due in of 2014, Moldova is one step away from progressing into a November 2014, or possibly even sooner; the more complex, more rewarding phase of relations with the Moldovan government wants to sign the key EU. Implementing the association agenda will spur economic EU agreements before then. growth and will multiply linkages with Moldova’s biggest trading partner, the EU. However, Moldova’s progress down Moldova is most fearful of moves against its estimated 300,000 migrant workers in the European path promises to be one of the main focuses Russia, and of existential escalation of the for intrigue in the region in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Birourilor De Schimb Valutar Ale Băncilor Licenţiate Care Efectuează Operaţiuni De Schimb Valutar În Numerar Cu Pers
    Pagina 1 din 34 Lista birourilor de schimb valutar ale băncilor licenţiate care efectuează operaţiuni de schimb valutar în numerar cu persoane fizice pe teritoriul Republicii Moldovei la data de 01.02.2021 nr. Denumirea subdiviziunii separate Sediul subdiviziunii separate a băncii Denumirea băncii licenţiate Telefon d/o a băncii licenţiate licenţiate B.C. "Moldindconbank" S.A. 1. (022) 426-223; 426-224; B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Stabil" mun. Chişinău, bd. Mircea cel Bătrîn, 2 426-225 2. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.15 a Sucursalei "Stabil" mun. Chişinău, bd. Mircea cel Bătrîn, 12/2 (022) 426-228 3. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.80 a Sucursalei "Stabil" r. Dubăsari, s. Coşniţa (0248) 25-501; 25-502 4. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.25 a Sucursalei "Kiev" mun. Chişinău, str. Bogdan Voievod, 1/1 (022) 498-667 5. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Kiev" mun. Chişinău, str. Kiev, 9/1 (022) 311-073 6. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Negruzzi" mun. Chişinău, bd. Ștefan cel Mare și Sfânt, 6 (022) 272-930; 272-807 7. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.51 a Sucursalei mun. Chişinău, bd. Negruzzi, 4/2 (022) 271-292 "Negruzzi" 8. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Testemiţeanu" mun. Chişinău, str.Testemiţanu, 22 (022) 731-682; 224-316 9. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.60 a Sucursalei mun. Chişinău, str. Testemiţanu, 29 (022) 287-354 "Testemiţeanu" 10. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. (022) 630-886; 630- Sucursala "Alba-Iulia" mun. Chişinău, str. Alba Iulia, 77/19 887; 630-888 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan 2016
    Environmental Protection of International River Basins This project is implemented by a Consortium led by Hulla and Co. (EPIRB) HumanDynamics KG Contract No 2011/279-666, EuropeAid/131360/C/SER/Multi Project Funded by Ministry of Environment the European Union DRAFT THE PRUT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 - 2021 Prepared in alignment to the EuropeanWater Framework Directive2000/60/EC Prepared by Institute of Ecology and Geography of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Chisinau, 2015 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.General description of the Prut River Basin ................................................................................. 7 1.1. Natural conditions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1. Climate and vegetation................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2. Geological structure and geomorphology ....................................................................................... 8 1.1.3. Surface water resources.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.3.1. Rivers .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Ri~ for Human Development
    INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP 10 RI~ FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 26F Plaza Street, N E , Leesburg, Virgnia 20176, U S A. WINTER HEAT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MOLDOVA USAID AGREEMENT NO. 121-A-00-99-00707-00 FINAL REPORT June 30, 1999 Tel (703) 443-2078, Fax. (703) 443-2012, E-mad mhd@erols corn TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Report of Fuel Dellveries 1. Institutions which recelve fuel A. Hospitals ..... ....... 1 B. Boarding Schools & Orphanages .... ...... 2 C. Boarding Schools for Dlsabled .... ...... 3 D. Secondary Schools .......................... 3 E. Nurseries . ............................ .... 21 F. Pensloners & Vulnerable Famllles ...... 21 G. Other ................................. .. 40 H, Total Delivered ....................... 40 I. Summary of Dellverles by Categories ...... 41 J. Coverage Agalnst Heatmg Requlrements .... 41 Repalrs to Heatlng Systems ........... 42 Monitoring .......... ....... 43 Problems & How Problems were Addressed ........... 45 Outstanding Issues .......... 46 Cooperation wlth GOM .......... 46 Unforessen Matters ....... 47 Descrlbe any Matters/Problems Concerning Fuel Deliveries/Fuel Companies ....... 47 Number of Outstanding Fuel Companies Vouchers to be Paid ...... ....... 47 Other Comments ........... ...... 48 ATTACHMENT 1 Fuel Deliveries to Instltutlons ATTACHMENT 2: Coal Dellverles by Dlstrlct GR/AS Coal & Heatlng 011 for Instltutlons ATTACHMENT 3: Coal Dellverles by Dlstrlct - AS Coal for Households ATTACHMENT 4: Beneflclarles ATTACHMENT 5: Fuel Purchases ATTACHMENT 6: Coal Dellverles by Month ATTACHMENT 7. Payments
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Response and Recovery Monthly Bulletin March 2021
    COVID-19 Response and Recovery Monthly Bulletin March 2021 The Office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator / United Nations Moldova can be contacted at the following email address [email protected] or phone number (+373 22) 220 045 1 COVID-19 Epi and Health situation update (Data as at 31 March unless stated otherwise) The total number of COVID-19 cases in the country The number of new cases has grown substantially has continued to accelerate and reached 230,241 at during March and reached a 7-day average of the end of March. The number increased further on 1,465 at the end of March compared to 1,291 at the first day of April and now stands at 231,756. the beginning of the month. The number of active cases increased for the first The 7-day average for the number of deaths increased few weeks of March and started to decrease substantially in March and currently stands at 42.71. towards the end of the Month. The number of The total number of deaths was 4,960 at the end of active cases at the end of March stood at 17,429. March and exceeded 5,000 on the first day of April. United Nations in the Republic of Moldova UN Moldova Monthly Bulletin - March 2021 | 2 The average number of very serious cases Overall, fifty-nine percent of all cases have been increased steadily in March, reaching 345 during recorded among women and 41% among men. the week of March 22-28. The total number of However, the proportion of all deaths between hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at the end of the two groups are approximately equal (50% the month was 4,167, out of which 331 were in each).
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for 2009
    Contract number: 2009/219-955 Project Title: Building confidence between Chisinau and Tiraspol Report starting date: 01 January 2010 Report end date: 31 December 2011 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Support to Confidence Building Measures II – Final Report 2010-2011 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4. SUPPORT TO CREATION OF DNIESTER EUROREGION AND RESTORATION OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC. ........................................... 7 IV. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market
    GENDER DIFFERENCES ON SUB-NATIONAL LEVEL IN MOLDOVA Nina Chesnokova National Statistical Bureau March 2014, Geneva Need for comparative gender analysis at subnational level Law on Regional Development setting out main regional development objectives, principles, frameworks and planning instruments Government Programme "European Integration: Freedom, Democracy, Prosperity" Moldavian National Demographic Security Strategy Gender Disparities in Politics Results of latest local elections: Gender disparities at registration phase: 4,204 candidates to Mayors and Vice Mayors, including 843 females (20%) were registered and only one in four female candidate was elected. The largest representation of female candidates was in the local administration of the Southern Zone - 25%, and in Cimislia District of the zone it was 42%. However, only 7 out of 53 female candidates were elected in the region. Female candidates are mostly successful in elections of District, Rural and Municipal Councillors: up to 40% were elected in some regions. However, in some administrative areas there are less than 20% of female councillors. Only 3 women were elected District Chairpersons - one in each of three regions: North, Centre and South, which is only 8.8% of total number of Chairpersons. Population Size and Structure About 30% of the population live both in the Northern and Central Zones, over 15% live in the Southern Zone and the population of Gagauzia is about 5% of the total population of the country. Residents of Chișinău Municipality comprise about a fifth of the total population of the country. Steady depopulation trends prevail in three regions: Centre, South and especially North. 51.9% of the total population are women and 48.1% are men.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova Under Lucinschi
    Moldova under Lucinschi PAUL D. QUINLAN uring the Soviet period Moldova was commonly referred to as "sunny D Moldova." Unfortunately, today the country's economic situation is anything but sunny. Moldova has the ignominious distinction of being one of the three poorest states in Europe. Since declaring independence in 1991 , Moldova has had the largest fall in gross domestic product and living standard of any former social- ist state in Europe. The GDP is a mere 30 percent of what it was in 1990. The average monthly nominal wage was a pitiful 405 le¡ (singular leu), or U.S.$32, as of the middle of 2000 . Moldova also has been plagued by myriad political problems as it struggles to make the transition from communism to democracy and a market economy. Although politically the country has made significant progress in establishing functioning democratic institutions , other problems, especially its dire economic situation, are taking their toll on its young democrat- ic political system and have raised concern about Moldova 's existence as an inde- pendent state . In this article , 1 take a brief look at the overwhelming economic, political, and other problems that Moldova faced from the parliamentary elections of March 1998 to those of February 2001, in an effort to understand why Moldo- va has now turned back to the Communist Party for leadership. The March 1998 Parliamentary Elections and the Second Ciubuc Government President Petru Lucinschi's chances of carrying out important reforms were hin- dered from the start by the scheduling of parliamentary elections for early 1998. This also relegated Prime Minister Ion Ciubuc's cabinet to a caretaker role.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghidul Serviciilor Sociale Din Raionul Glodeni
    MINISTERUL SĂNĂTĂȚII, MUNCII ȘI PROTECȚIEI SOCIALE AL REPUBLICII MOLDOVA Ghidul serviciilor sociale din raionul Glodeni Cuprins Prefață 3 Centrul Comunitar Multifuncțional „Balatina” 4 Cantină socială 4 Centrul Comunitar Multifuncțional „Armonie” 5 Centrul Comunitar Multifuncțional de Asistenți Sociali „Încredere” 5 Serviciul de Asistență Personală 6 Serviciul Social „Echipa mobilă” 6 Serviciul social „Sprijin familial pentru familiile cu copii în situație de risc” 7 Servciul Îngrijire Socială la Domiciliu 7 Serviciul Tutelă/Curatelă 8 Serviciul Asistență Socială Comunitară în cadrul DASPF Glodeni 8 Serviciul Social „Suport Monetar” 9 „Tabita” – Casa de caritate 9 Centrul Medico-Social Stârcea, misiunea religioasă catolică „Caritas Moldova” 9 Centrul Comunitar Multifuncțional „VITA” 10 Activitatea serviciilor sociale în imagini 11 — 2 — Prefață Echipa proiectului „Planificarea comunitară a serviciilor sociale prin dialog public” aduce mulțumiri specialiștilor Direcției Asistență Socială și Protecția Familiei Glo- deni, precum și organizațiilor societății civile locale – Asociația Obștească „Neemia”, Asociația Obștească a Veteranilor Războiului din 1992 pentru Integritatea Republicii Moldova și Asociația Obștească „Asociația Băștinașilor „Ciuciulea – vatră de dor” – pentru contribuție și implicare în colectarea și structurarea informațiilor despre ser- viciile sociale din raion. Suntem convinși că Ghidul de față va fi util pentru cetățenii care au nevoie de servicii sociale și doresc să cunoască mai multe detalii despre activitatea sau
    [Show full text]