A Critical Race and Critical Whiteness Theory Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Racialized Practices in a Literacy Across the Curriculum Course
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE December 2014 A Critical Race and Critical Whiteness Theory Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Racialized Practices in a Literacy Across the Curriculum Course Kathleen Cullen Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Cullen, Kathleen, "A Critical Race and Critical Whiteness Theory Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Racialized Practices in a Literacy Across the Curriculum Course" (2014). Dissertations - ALL. 190. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/190 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the racialized practices enacted by seven preservice teachers while they participated in a university-based literacy across the curriculum course that included a school-based tutoring component. Research questions asked: 1) what racialized practices were enacted by preservice content-area teachers when they participated in a required literacy across the curriculum course that included one-on-one tutoring of youth at an urban secondary school, and 2) how did preservice content-area teachers’ backgrounds contribute to their racialized practices? This study drew on the premises of critical race theory and critical whiteness theory to define racialized practices. The study began with these theories’ assumptions that race is an important social construction in U.S. society that is used to position people hierarchically, especially oppressing people of color. Racialized practices are ways of acting, speaking, and teaching that construct race as important. These practices include colorblindness, essentializing, and microaggression, as well as culturally responsive teaching, a positive racialized practice grounded in students’ funds of knowledge and intended to counter more oppressive practices. Data sources included transcripts from semi-structured interviews, field notes from classroom and tutoring observations and various course and tutoring related artifacts such as the course syllabus, lesson plans, unit plans and written reflections. Data were analyzed first, using a reflexive, constant comparative approach to gain insights into participants’ rhetoric and actions. Second, data were reconsidered to delineate racialized practices. The racialized practices of the preservice teachers involved in this literacy study were categorized as relationship-focused or instructionally-focused. Although all participants enacted both positive and negative racialized practices, relationship-focused participants tended to exhibit qualitatively different practices compared to the instructionally-focused participants. Regardless of their orientation, when participants shared their view of whether race mattered in education, the mostly White participants spoke predominantly of the significance of other people’s races and not their own race. Racialized practices that were consistent with culturally-based pedagogies included intentionally nurturing relationships with students at the tutoring site, talking about ways to help students understand and negotiate the culture of power that is dominant in educational institutions including higher education and cautioning preservice peers that they need to be cognizant not to advance stereotypes. Racialized practices that reflected participants’ deficit thinking about their tutees, as well as their own discomfort in talking about racial issues included the enactments of racial microaggressions, distancing strategies and White talk. This study provides new insights into how preservice teachers’ racialized practices shape and are shaped by the racial hierarchy that continues to exist in schools. Findings have implications for school professionals, teacher educators and researchers who are interested in identifying and disrupting racialized literacy practices that may be harmful to students. Additionally, this study suggests that further exploration is needed to understand how race is implicated in relationship-focused literacy teaching, content-focused literacy teaching and students’ engagement in learning across the curriculum. A CRITICAL RACE AND CRITICAL WHITENESS THEORY ANALYSIS OF PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ RACIALIZED PRACTICES IN A LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM COURSE by Kathleen A. Cullen B.S., SUNY Oswego, 1981 M.S., SUNY Oswego, 1984 C.A.S., SUNY Oswego, 2001 Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education Syracuse University December 2014 Copyright © Kathleen A. Cullen 2014 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my niece and my father. To my niece, I hope the world becomes a more socially just place. To my dad who passed away before I completed my dissertation, I want you to know that I did it! v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although my name appears prominently on the cover of this doctoral dissertation document, this product is the result of a great many people. First, I would like to acknowledge and thank my doctoral dissertation chair, Dr. Kathleen Hinchman, and my dissertation committee members, Dr. Marcelle Haddix and Dr. Barbara Applebaum, for their mentorship and support throughout this process. I would also like to thank Ms. Becky Freeman and Ms. Isabelle Glod for their constant support and guidance. In addition, I would like to thank my doctoral student friends whom I met at Syracuse University - some of whom have already attained their doctoral degree - and some of whom are still in the doctoral degree pipeline. I would like to especially thank Dr. Kristen Munger who was a never ending cheerleader and mentor throughout this process. Lastly, I am extremely grateful to the professor who graciously welcomed me into the literacy across the curriculum course to collect my data, and to Ann, Eden, Helen, Josh, Kristen, Randy and Rufus, who volunteered to be part of this important work. I am grateful as well to the principal, staff and students at the urban middle school where the tutoring sessions took place. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One ............................................................................................................................. 1 Rationale ...................................................................................................................... 2 This Study ....................................................................................................... 9 Significance of the Current Study.................................................................. 9 Overview of Chapters ............................................................................................... 10 Chapter Two: Literature Review .......................................................................................... 12 Teacher Education and the Racialized Practices of Preservice Teachers .............. 12 Teacher Education and Race ........................................................................ 12 Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives Toward Teaching Students of Color...14 Teacher Educators’ Efforts to Address Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives Toward Race ................................................................................................. 19 Multicultural Education ................................................................... 20 Culturally Relevant Pedagogy ......................................................... 23 Culturally Responsive Teaching ..................................................... 24 Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy ...................................................... 27 Field Experiences ............................................................................. 27 Summary ....................................................................................................... 30 Literacy Teaching and Racialized Practices ............................................................ 31 Evolution of Literacy Across the Curriculum Preservice Teachers’ Education ....................................................................................................... 31 Multicultural Literacy Education ................................................................. 34 Culturally Responsive Literacy Pedagogy .................................................. 35 vii Culturally Sustaining Literacy Pedagogy .................................................... 36 Summary ....................................................................................................... 36 Theoretical Frameworks .......................................................................................... 37 Critical Race Theory .................................................................................... 39 Critical Whiteness Theory ........................................................................... 43 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 47 Chapter Three: Method ......................................................................................................... 50 Settings ...................................................................................................................... 50 University Classroom .................................................................................