Environmental Compensation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TemaNord 2015:572 TemaNord TemaNord 2015:572 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Environmental compensation Key conditions for increased and cost effective application Environmental compensation Environmental impacts are increasing due to human activities. The overuse of the benefits nature provides us is the direct result of our failure to put a price on these benefits. One way of addressing this is to require environmental compensation. The purpose of the study is to provide Nordic Council of Ministers and national decision-makers with an overview of key conditions for increased, flexible and cost-effective application of compensation. The study shows that for a relatively small cost society can make a significant investment in the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services by requiring compensation. The study outlines three main recommendations on how to increase the use of environmental compensation: 1. Stimulate supply of, and demand for, compensation 2. Clarify and supplement guidelines and legal framework 3. Strengthen Nordic cooperation on compensation TemaNord 2015:572 ISBN 978-92-893-4335-0 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-4337-4 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-4336-7 (EPUB) ISSN 0908-6692 TN2015572 omslag.indd 1 08-09-2015 13:59:16 Environmental compensation Key conditions for increased and cost effective application Anders Enetjärn, Scott Cole, Matleena Kniivilä, Svein Erik Hårklau, Linus Hasselström, Tryggve Sigurdson and Johan Lindberg TemaNord 2015:572 Environmental compensation Key conditions for increased and cost effective application Anders Enetjärn, Scott Cole, Matleena Kniivilä, Svein Erik Hårklau, Linus Hasselström, Tryggve Sigurdson and Johan Lindberg ISBN 978-92-893-4335-0 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-4337-4 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-4336-7 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2015-572 TemaNord 2015:572 ISSN 0908-6692 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2015 Layout: Hanne Lebech Cover photo: ImageSelect Print: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers. However, the contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views, policies or recom- mendations of the Nordic Council of Ministers. www.norden.org/nordpub Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involv- ing Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland. Nordic co-operation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an im- portant role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic co-operation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive. Nordic Council of Ministers Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 www.norden.org Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Environmental compensation .....................................................................................................10 Popular Summary ....................................................................................................................................11 Introduction and background .....................................................................................................11 Environmental Compensation in the Nordic Countries ...................................................12 Benefits, Costs, and Risks ..............................................................................................................13 Key issues in developing a compensation framework .....................................................14 Recommendations for increasing the use of compensation ..........................................14 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................17 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................17 1.2 Purpose and objective ......................................................................................................19 1.3 Approach and methods ....................................................................................................20 1.4 Scope ........................................................................................................................................22 1.5 Structure of this report ....................................................................................................23 2. The Concept of Environmental Compensation ....................................................................25 2.1 Definitions .............................................................................................................................25 2.2 Method for compensation scaling................................................................................30 2.3 Nordic environmental compensation example ......................................................37 3. Benefits, costs, and risks of compensation ............................................................................41 3.1 Benefits ...................................................................................................................................41 3.2 Costs .........................................................................................................................................45 3.3 Linking Benefits and Costs ..............................................................................................55 3.4 Addressing risks ..................................................................................................................58 4. Environmental compensation in the Nordic countries ....................................................61 4.1 Drivers for environmental compensation ................................................................61 4.2 Experience and status of Environmental Compensation ...................................73 4.3 Key challenges......................................................................................................................94 5. Key issues in developing a compensation framework .................................................. 103 5.1 Environmental compensation as part of the planning and regulatory process .......................................................................................................... 103 5.2 Supply and Demand ........................................................................................................ 104 5.3 Cost-effectiveness considerations ............................................................................ 107 6. Recommendations for increasing the use of environmental compensation in Nordic countries ....................................................................................................................... 127 6.1 Stimulate supply of, and demand for, compensation ....................................... 128 6.2 Clarify and supplement compensation guidelines and legal framework .......................................................................................................................... 130 6.3 Strengthen Nordic cooperation ................................................................................. 132 References ................................................................................................................................................ 137 Sammanfattning .................................................................................................................................... 143 List of boxes, figures and tables Box 2.1: BBOP definition ...................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 2.1. Compensation within the mitigation hierarchy (inspired from BBOP) ................................................................................................................................................... 29 Box 2.2. BBOP Mitigation hierarchy ................................................................................................ 29 Figure 2.2. Equivalency Analysis scales a compensatory credit such that its value is equivalent to the debit .................................................................................................. 32 Box 2.3. BBOP Best practice principles .......................................................................................... 34 Figure 2.3. Decidous forests are focus habitats in measuring the debit, identi- fying possible credits and scaling compensation in the Swedish Nordic Iron Ore Ludvika mining project ............................................................................................... 37 Figure 2.4. Impact and environmental compensation in the Swedish Nordic Iron Ore Ludvika mining project ............................................................................................... 39 Figure 3.1. Cost categories that can be affected in a compensation framework .......... 46 Table 3.1. Summary of major cost categories associated with environmental compensation ...................................................................................................................................