State Enhanced Remedy in New Bedford, South Terminal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Enhanced Remedy in New Bedford, South Terminal From: Johnson, Judith L NAE To: Ralph Abele Cc: Mackay, Joseph B NAE; Sneeringer, Paul J NAE Subject: Additional references Date: Monday, July 23, 2012 12:26:10 PM Attachments: Auster1986.pdf Heinemann1992.pdf NBreferencesmodWithComments2.docx Hi Ralph, Attached are two additional references that I found in my hard copy files that were on your list (please see added comments on NBreferencesmodWithComments2). The attached references include the following: Auster, P. J., and L. L. Stewart. 1986. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (NorthAtlantic) Sand Lance. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Rep. 82 (11.66). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. 11 pp. http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/wdb/pub/species_profiles/82_11-066.pdf Heinemann, Dennis. 1992. Foraging Ecology of Roseate Terns Breeding on Bird Island, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. Unpubl. Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 54 p Please call me should you have any questions. Regards, Judi Judith L. Johnson Army Corps of Engineers Evaluation Branch 696 Virginia Road Concord, Massachusetts 01742-2751 978-318-8138 FAX 978-318-8560 [email protected] RE'FERENCE COPY Do Not Remove from the Library U.S. Fjsh god 't{jld!jfe Service Biological Report 82 (11.66) National Wetlands Research Centet TR EL·82·4 June 1986 700 Cajun Dome Boulevard Lafayette, Louisiana 70506 Species Profiles: Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (North Atlantic) SAND LANCE Coastal Ecology Group Fish and Wildlife Service Waterways Experiment Station U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Biological Report 82 (11.66} TR EL-82-4 June 1986 Species Profiles: Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (North Atlantic) SAND LANCE by Peter J. Auster and Lance L. Stewart NOAA's National Undersea Research Program The University of Connecticut at Avery Point Groton, CT 06340 Project Manager Carroll-Cordes Project Officer David Moran National Coastal Ecosystems Team U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1010 Gause Boulevard Slidell, LA 70458 Performed for Coastal Ecology Group U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg, MS 39180 and National Coastai Ecosystems Team Research and Development Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 This series may be referenced as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1983-19 . Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coasta'l' fishes and invertebrates. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 82(11). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. This profile may be cited as follows: Auster, P. J., and L. L. Stewart. 1986. Species profiles: life histories and environmental reQuirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North Atlantic)--sand lance. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 82 (11.66). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. 11 pp. PREFACE This species profile is one of a series on coasta1 aquatic organisms, principally fish, of sport, commercial, or ecological importance. The profiles are designed to provide coastal managers, engineers, and biologists with a brief comprehensive sketch of the biological characteristics and environmental requirements of the species and to describe how populations of the species may be expected to react to environmental changes caused by coastal development. Each profile has sections on taxonomy, life history, ecological role, environmental requirements, and economic importance, if applicable. A three-ring binder is used for this series so that new profiles can be added as they are prepared. This project is jointly planned and financed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Suggestions or questions regarding this report should be directed to one of the following addresses. · Information Transfer Specialist National Coastal Ecosystems Team U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NASA-Slidell Computer Complex 1010 Gause Boulevard Slidell, LA 70458 or U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Attention: WESER-C Post Office Box 631 Vicksburg, MS 39180 iii CONVERSION TABLE f~etric to U.S. Customary ~lul tiply fu:. To Obtain millimeters (mm) 0.03937 inches centimeters (em) o. 393 7 inches meters (m) 3.281 feet kilometers (km) 0.6214 miles square meters (m 2 ) 10.76 square feet square ki 1 ometers ( km 2 ) 0.3861 square miles hectares (ha) 2.4 71 acres liters (1) 0.2642 gallons 3 cubic meters (m ) 35.31 cubic feet cubic meters o. 0008110 acre-feet mil1igrams (mg) 0.00003527 ounces grams (g) 0.03527 ounces kilograms (k9) 2.205 pounds metric tons (t) 2205.0 pounds metric tons 1.102 short tons kilocalories (kcal) 3.968 British thennal units Celsius degrees 1.8(°C) + 32 Fahrenheit degrees U.S. Customary to Metric inches 25.40 millimeters inches 2.54 centimeters feet (ft) 0.3048 meters fathoms 1.829 meters miles (mi) 1.609 kilometers nautical miles (nmi) 1.852 kil 011eters 2 square feet (ft ) 0.0929 square meters acres 2 0.4047 hectares square miles (mi ) 2.590 square kilometers g a11 ons ( ga1 ) 3.785 1i ters 3 cubic feet (ft ) o. 02831 cubic meters acre-feet 12.33.0 cubic meters ounces ( oz) 28.35 grams pounds ( 1 b) 0.4536 ki 1 og rams short tons (ton) 0.9072 metric tons British thennal units (Btu) 0,2520 kil ocal aries Fahrenheit degrees 0.5556(°F - 32) Celsius degrees iv CONTENTS PREFACE i i i CONVERSION FACTORS • v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi NOMENCLATURE/TAXONOMY/RANGE 1 MORPHOLOGY/IDENTIFICATION AIDS • 1 REASON FOR INCLUSION IN SERIES • 4 LIFE HISTORY • 4 Spawning • 4 Fecundity and Eggs • 4 Larvae • 4 Juveniles and Adults • 5 GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS • 5 FISHERY 6 ECOLOGICAL ROLE 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS • 6 Temperature 6 Salinity • 6 Habitat 7 Other Environmental Factors 7 LITERATURE CITED • 9 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful for the review by L.J. Buckley and K. Sherman of the National Marine Fisheries Service, Narragansett, Rhode Island. We a 1so thank Mary Jane Spring for expertly preparing the figures and Jennifer Bell Crouch for typing the manuscript. vi Figure 1. Sand lance. SAND LANCE NOMENCLATURE/TAXONOMY/RANGE spatial changes in the genus Ammodytes from the northwest Atlantic and Scientific name •••••••••••••• Ammodytes distinguished groups with high, spp. intermediate, and low meristic Preferred common name •••••••••••Sand counts. The intermediate group was lance (Figure 1) split, and fish with high to inter­ Other common names. • • • • • • • • Sand ee1, mediate counts were named A. dubi us sand 1aunce, 1ant, 1ance, equi 11 e, and those with low to intermediate northern sand lance (A. dubius), counts were named ~· hexapterus American sand lance (A. iimericanus) (= ~· americanus). The range of Class••••••••••••••••••• ~ Osteichthyes meristic characteristics and overlap Order•••••.....•..•.•••••• Perciformes between species of this genus over a Family•••••••••••••••••••• Ammodytidae wide geographic area were s i gni fi cant (Table 1). As a result of this variation, sand lance in the North Geographic range: From northern Atlantic area off the coast of the Labrador and Hudson Bay south to U. S. (Ammodytes spp. ) wi 11 be covered Cape Hatteras (Bigelow and Schroeder as a combined group in this profile. 1953; Richards et al. 1963; Liem and Scott 1966) and from upper estuaries The body of the sand lance is (Norcross et al. 1961) to the e~ge small, elongate, and slender. Body of the Continental Shelf (Richards depth is uniform from the opercular and Kendall 1973)(Figure 2). This region to the beginning of the anal genus is most abundant, however, fin. Body depth then begins to taper along the inner half of the towards the caudal peduncle. The tail Continental Shelf and is most is forked. The anal fin originates commonly associated with sandy under the 29th or 30th dorsal fin substrates ( Bigelow and Schroeder ray. The lateral line is straight. 1953; Grosslein and Azarovitz 1982). The mouth is terminal with lower jaw projecting forward and no teeth (Liem and Scott 1966). Fin ray counts vary MORPHOLOGY/IDENTIFICATION AIDS as in Table 1. Meristic values of sand lance Color of individual fish is vari­ vary greatly with latitude as well as a b 1 e. The dorsa 1 surface can be with distance from shore at the same olive, brown, or bluish green. Lower latitude (Backus 1957; Richards et al. sides are silver with a dull white 1963; Winters 1970; Scott 1972; ventral region. Some individuals have Pellegrini 1976). Richards et al. a steel-blue iridescent longitudinal ( 1 963) demonstrated various types of stripe. CANADA MAINE I \ ATlANTIC OCEAN MILES 0 50 100 I ====' 0-­ w50 100 KILOMETERS Figure 2. Distribution of sand lances along the North Atlantic coast. 2 Table 1. Meristic values of Northwest Atlantic species of Ammodytes (adapted from Pellegrini 1979). Vertebrae Dorsal fin ra~s Anal fin ra~s No. in Species sample Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Ammodytes hexapterus (Richards et al. 1963) 1020 61-73 51-62 23-33 East coast of North America A. hexapterus (Scott 1972) 73 64-71 68.1 55-61 57.6 27-32 29.4 Newburyport, Massachusetts ~· americanus (Backus 1957) 12 62-69 67.2 56-60 58.5 28-31 29.6 Labrador ~· americanus adults (Pellegrini 1976) 700 63-73 67.9 52-62 57.4 26-32 29.4 w ~· americanus juveniles (Pellegrini 1976) 610 64-73 68.0 53-62 57.8 27-33 29.7 A. dubius (Richards et al. 1963) - 65-78 56-68 27-35 East coast of North America A. dubius (Leim and Scott 1966) - 71-75 62-68 30-35 East coast of Canada A. hexahterus (Winters 1970) - 70-78 60-69 30-37 Offs ore Newfoundland A.
Recommended publications
  • Addressing Effects of Offshore Wind Development on Bat Species in the Northeastern United States
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses November 2018 NOT GONE WITH THE WIND: Addressing Effects of Offshore Wind Development on Bat Species in the Northeastern United States Zara Rae Dowling University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Dowling, Zara Rae, "NOT GONE WITH THE WIND: Addressing Effects of Offshore Wind Development on Bat Species in the Northeastern United States" (2018). Doctoral Dissertations. 1427. https://doi.org/10.7275/12644119 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1427 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOT GONE WITH THE WIND: ADDRESSING EFFECTS OF OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT ON BAT SPECIES IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented by ZARA RAE DOWLING Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2018 Environmental Conservation © Copyright by Zara Rae Dowling 2018 All Rights Reserved NOT GONE WITH THE
    [Show full text]
  • Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-Quadrangle Area of Cape Cod and Islands, Southeast Massachusetts
    Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the State Geologist and Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Surficial Geologic Map of the Pocasset-Provincetown- Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-Quadrangle Area of Cape Cod and Islands, Southeast Massachusetts Compiled by Byron D. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen Open-File Report 2006-1260-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Stone, B.D., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., comps., 2009, Surficial geologic map of the Pocasset­ Provincetown-Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-quadrangle area of Cape Cod and Islands, southeast Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-E. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Cover figure. Photograph of eroding cliffs at Gay Head on Martha’s Vineyard (source:
    [Show full text]
  • Dukes County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER AQUINNAH, TOWN OF 250070 CHILMARK, TOWN OF 250068 EDGARTOWN, TOWN OF 250069 GOSNOLD, TOWN OF 250071 OAK BLUFFS, TOWN OF 250072 TISBURY, TOWN OF 250073 WEST TISBURY, TOWN OF 250074 Dukes County Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25007CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial Countywide FIS
    [Show full text]
  • Favorite Cruising Spots in Buzzard's Bay and Vineyard Sound Cuttyhunk Island—Typically a 1.5 Hour Sail on a Close Reach; A
    Favorite Cruising spots in Buzzard’s Bay and Vineyard Sound Cuttyhunk Island—typically a 1.5 hour sail on a close reach; a tiny island and crowded anchorage but a fun and very popular place to stop and walk around, stop for lunch or stay overnight. Inner Harbor is well-protected with both moorings and small anchorage available. Moorings also available along beach outside of breakwater between harbor and Nashawena, and good holding ground for anchoring outside of breakwater if anchorage is full. Lovely view of Elizabeth Island chain from top of hill. There is a market on the way up the hill from the main dock on your left. Also a store with Cuttyhunk “stuff” on the right after the dock. Also a tiny shack to the left which has AMAZING clothing and jewelry—bring cash! Fun local pizza called SOPRANO’s (“pizza to die for”). The best kept secret is “Cuttyhunk Fishing Club” which serves THE BEST breakfast al fresco on their porch on a hill overlooking the Elizabeth Islands and Martha’s Vineyard. Quick’s Hole—The safest passage between Buzzard’s Bay and Vineyard Sound. Quicks is nestled between Pasque and Nashawena Islands (two more Elizabeth Islands) and as such is normally protected from wind and seas. There’s a lovely white sand beach with dunes and lots of good anchorage fairly close up. Great lunch spot. The beach can be closed at random by the owners of Naushon Island however. Lambert’s Cove on North side of Martha’s Vineyard on Vineyard Sound side. Nice beach with dunes for a swim and picnic lunch in normal SW wind.
    [Show full text]
  • American Beech in Coastal New England: Forest History and Dynamics
    American beech in coastal New England: forest history and dynamics A thesis presented by Posy Elizabeth Busby to The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Forest Science Harvard Forest Harvard University June 2006 Acknowledgements I am grateful to many people for helping me develop this thesis. First, I would like to thank my advisers: Glenn Motzkin, David Foster, Charlie Canham, and Missy Holbrook. Discussions with David sparked an early interest in exploring the history of Naushon’s beech forests. Missy has been a devoted mentor throughout my undergraduate and graduate education at Harvard, while more recently I have been fortunate to work closely with Charlie on tree ring analyses and other quantitative aspects of this thesis. Over the past few years I have benefited greatly from Glenn’s vast knowledge of the natural history and ecology of the Northeast, and his eagerness to teach and inspire students. I would also like to thank John Burk, Anne Marie Casper, Brian DeGasperis, Elaine Doughty, Paul Elias, Ed Faison, Chris Graham, Brian Hall, Brooks Mathewson, Rob McDonald, Brandon McElroy, Jason McLachlan, Peter Thomas, and Jill Thompson for assisting with field work. Gon and Holly Leon and Ren Davidson graciously welcomed this large crew into their home for a busy week of fieldwork. Additionally, Paul Elias, Gon and Holly, and Bruce Bagley provided valuable historical information and logistical support. Brian Hall provided assistance with GIS mapping, and Bryan Black and Neil Pederson helped with tree ring analysis. Jason McLachlan, David Orwig, and Wyatt Oswald provided comments on an earlier draft of Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Summary of Proposed Changes
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) Unit C00, Clark Pond, Massachusetts Summary of Proposed Changes Type of Unit: System Unit County: Essex Congressional District: 6 Existing Map: The existing CBRS map depicting this unit is: ■ 025 dated October 24, 1990 Proposed Boundary Notice of Availability: The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) opened a public comment period on the proposed changes to Unit C00 via Federal Register notice. The Federal Register notice and the proposed boundary (accessible through the CBRS Projects Mapper) are available on the Service’s website at www.fws.gov/cbra. Establishment of Unit: The Coastal Barrier Resources Act (Pub. L. 97-348), enacted on October 18, 1982 (47 FR 52388), originally established Unit C00. Historical Changes: The CBRS map for this unit has been modified by the following legislative and/or administrative actions: ■ Coastal Barrier Improvement Act (Pub. L. 101-591) enacted on November 16, 1990 (56 FR 26304) For additional information on historical legislative and administrative actions that have affected the CBRS, see: https://www.fws.gov/cbra/Historical-Changes-to-CBRA.html. Proposed Changes: The proposed changes to Unit C00 are described below. Proposed Removals: ■ One structure and undeveloped fastland near Rantoul Pond along Fox Creek Road ■ Four structures and undeveloped fastland located to the north of Argilla Road and east of Fox Creek Proposed Additions: ■ Undeveloped fastland and associated aquatic habitat along Treadwell Island Creek,
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts
    John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Hurricane Sandy Remapping Project: Massachusetts MA-01P MA-02P New Hampshire C00 MA-03 C01 Massachusetts C01AP C01A C01B MA-04 Atlantic Ocean MA-06 MA-08P C01C C01CP MA-09P MA-11 MA-12 MA-10P C02P C03 C03A MA-19P Massachusetts MA-13P MA-13 Rhode Island MA-18P C04 MA-18AP MA-17P C06 MA-17AP Cape Cod Bay C11A MA-38P MA-14P C11AP MA-16 C11P C09P MA-20P C34A MA-35 C11 C19AP MA-33 C10 C08 MA-47P MA-15P MA-32 C09 C12 C31AP C13 MA-23P MA-31 C15 C14 C19A C31B MA-30 C16 MA-41P MA-36 MA-43 MA-43P C34 C15P C12P MA-46 C31A C19 C13P C17 MA-45P C19P MA-40P C32 C18A C18 MA-37P MA-24 MA-42P MA-26 C35 C33 C29B Nantucket Sound C34P MA-27P C29A MA-27 MA-25P C31 C26 C27 C29P C25 C20 C29 C20P C23 C28 MA-28P C21 C24 MA-29P C23P C22P This map depicts the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) units in Massachusetts that are part of the Hurricane Sandy Remapping Project. To view the proposed boundaries in more detail see the CBRS Projects Mapper: https://www.fws.gov/cbra/maps/mapper.html. µ 1:900,000 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Coastal Barrier Resources System Hurricane Sandy Remapping Project Summary of Proposed Changes for Massachusetts Number of Units Total Massachusetts Units: 109 (86 existing and 23 proposed new) System Units: 64 (61 existing and 3 proposed new) Otherwise Protected Areas (OPAs): 45 (25 existing and 20 proposed new) The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Naushon Island
    D N R O B A R L 0A S "! H I S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SR S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S T E G N O N A M E S S E N OAT N I NECKS D MINK POND S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S NS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S A Eastern oyster Y L VECKATIMEST A ISLAND B S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S D S S S S S S S S S S I O HORSENECK BEACH S CEDARJonahN crab ISLAND O STATE RESERVATION S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S N S S MASRYS S S S S S S S S ¢[S HSeMrrSingS guSll S S S S S S S S O LAKE DEP Environmental Sensitivity Map H MONOHANSETT S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S ISLANDS S S S S S S S S S S S S S p Daggerblade grass shrimp U A Harbor seal S BAY S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SN S S S S S S S S S S SCKREYSosSeaSte SterSn S S S S S S S S S S Haddock LA im May-Sep r S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S h S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
    [Show full text]
  • Martha's Vineyard Lighthouses Part 1
    151 Lagoon Pond Road Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 Formerly MVMUSEUM The Dukes County Intelligencer NOVEMBER 2019 VOLUME 60 Quarterly NO. 4 Martha’s Vineyard Museum’s Journal of Island History MVMUSEUM.ORG Martha’s Vineyard Lighthouses Martha’s Vineyard Part 1 Lighthouses, Part 1 Before electrification and automation, lighthouses were surrounded by storage sheds, oil houses, outhouses, and other small buildings, as shown in this photograph taken at Gay Head in the late 1890s. Gay Head West Chop Holmes Hole MVMUSEUM.ORG MVMUSEUM Cover, Vol. 60 No. 4.indd 1 3/20/20 11:02:55 AM MVM Membership Categories Details at mvmuseum.org/membership Basic ..............................................$55 Partner ........................................$150 Sustainer .....................................$250 Patron ..........................................$500 Benefactor................................$1,000 Basic membership includes one adult; higher levels include two adults. All levels include children through age 18. Full-time Island residents are eligible for discounted membership rates. Contact Sydney Torrence at 508-627-4441 x117. Reviving a Tradition Early in its history, when it was still named the Dukes County Intelli- gencer, this journal occasionally devoted an entire issue to a single subject. The first examples were relatively brief: Lloyd C. M. Hare on Vineyard whaling captains in San Francisco (February 1960), Sidney N. Riggs on Vineyard meeting houses (August 1960), and Alice Forbes Howland on the Pasque Island Fishing Club (February 1962) all topped out at twenty pages. Over time, however, they began to grow. Joseph Elvin’s article on the history of trap fishing, which took up the entirety of the May 1964 is- sue, was thirty-five pages, and Allan Keith’s on the mammals of Martha’s Vineyard (November 1969) was fifty-two.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Tern Inventory 1998
    Massachusetts Tern Inventory 1998 Bradford G. Blodget, State Ornithologist Compiled results from our cooperator network indicate 1998 was, overall, another excellent year for terns in Massachusetts, with improvements in numbers and generally good to excellent productivity. A variety of factors contributed to these results, including improved site management practices, improved habitat conditions, abundant food supplies, and low predation problems at most sites. Despite a very wet May and June, there were no devastating storms and weather was not a limiting factor in 1998. Census of terns in Massachusetts is accomplished using "pairs" as the basic census unit. Generally, complete nest counts are made, at some sites corrected using the Lincoln Index. At a few sites, pair estimates may be extrapolations based on partial nest counts or adult estimates adjusted for pairs by multiplying by 0.8. Where nest counts are made, the number of nests is converted to pairs on a 1:1 ratio. Estimates of the numbers of pairs reported and discussed in this summary, unless otherwise noted, are "A-period" estimates made during a standard 5-20 June window. "B-period" estimates, as sometimes referenced herein, are estimates made later than the "A-period" counts and are not included in the total pair estimates for the state. During the 1998 season, nesting terns were located at 73 sites out of approximately 112 sites along the Massachusetts coastline where nesting has been recorded since careful record keeping began in 1970. The biggest story in 1998 (if not for the decade) was the continued strong resurgence in common tern numbers, extending the strong rising trend evident since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Gosnold
    TOWN OF GOSNOLD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REVIEW APRIL 2021 PREPARED BY: DLS | Technical Assistance Bureau 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114-9569 www.mass.gov/dls Zack Blake, Bureau Chief Tara Lynch, Senior Project Manager Geoffrey E. Snyder Commissioner of Revenue Sean R. Cronin Senior Deputy Commissioner April 05, 2021 Board of Selectmen Gosnold Town House 28 Tower Rd Cuttyhunk, MA 02713 Dear Board Members, I am pleased to present the enclosed financial management review report for the Town of Gosnold. It is my hope that our guidance provides direction and serves as a resource for local officials as we build better government for our citizens. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Zack Blake, Technical Assistance Bureau Chief, at 617-626-2358 or [email protected]. Sincerely, Sean R. Cronin Senior Deputy Commissioner Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities mass.gov/orgs/division-of-local-services | P.O. Box 9569 Boston, MA 02114-9569 | (617) 626-2300 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE 2 GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE 7 1. Convert Elected Positions to Appointed 9 2. Appoint a Town Accountant and Abolish the Auditor Position 9 3. Establish an Assistant Treasurer/Collector Position 11 4. Take Appropriate Actions to Authorize the Board of Selectmen to Act as Other Policy Boards 12 5. Consider Making the Board of Selectmen the Electric Board 12 6. Explore Options to Employ a Contract or Regional Assessor 13 7. Define Goals and Expectations for the Town Administrator 14 8. Create a New Select Board’s Assistant Position 14 9. Realign the Harbor Department to Report under the Select Board 15 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 16 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Significanf COASTAL HABITATS of SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND and PORTIONS of LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK
    FINAL REPORT NORTHEAST COASTAL AREAS STUDY: SIGNIFICANf COASTAL HABITATS OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND AND PORTIONS OF LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK Submitted to u.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CO:MMfITEE ON APPROPRIATIONS AND u.S. SENATE CO:MMfITEE ON APPROPRIATIONS August 1991 PREPARED BY: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Southern New England - Long Island Sound Coastal and &tuary Of Box 307 Charlestown, Rhode Island 02813 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................ .. i I. Introduction .......................................... iii n. Scope of Project iv ill. Methodology: A. Delineation of Study Area Boundary .................... .. v B. Coastal Species of Special Emphasis .................... .. vi C. Identification of Significant Habitats of Special Emphasis Species .... vii 1) Individual Species Occurrences ..................... vii 2) Significant Habitats ............................ viii 3) Habitat Complexes viii N. Protection Strategies ix Acknowledgements x Key to Habitat Sites ........................................... xii Index Map xiii SITE DESCRIPTIONS (WITH MAPS): 1. The Narrows Complex ..................................... .. 1 2. Three Harbors Area 9 3. Nissequogue River 15 4. Port Jefferson - Stony Brook Harbor Complex 21 5. Peconic River - Pinelands Complex ............................... 27 6. North Fork Beach Complex .................................... 33 7. Orient Point - Islands Complex .................................. 39 8. Gardiners Island and Point 45 9. Montauk Peninsula Complex ..................................
    [Show full text]