DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Priorities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Priorities INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES INFRASTRUCTURE VISION COMMITTEE Released December 2018 Table o F Contents Infrastructure Policy Principles 1 Project Selection Criteria 2 ABOUT US 2 Priority Projects Map 3 ENHANCING MASS TRANSIT 5 • Lowcountry Rapid Transit New Road Construction 7 • Airport Connector Road • Mark Clark Expressway Completion • Berlin G. Myers Parkway Phase 3 • Sea Islands Greenway • College Park Road to Jedburg Road • Billy Swails Boulevard Extension • Glenn McConnell Parkway Extension Improving Existing Roads 10 • Hwy 17 / Main Road Interchange • I-526 Widening and 26/526 Interchange • Hwy 41 Corridor Improvement • Palmetto Commerce Interchange • Hwy 78 Widening • Palmetto Commerce Parkway Phase 3 • I-26 Widening and Improvements • Red Bank Road BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS 13 • Ashley River Non-Motorized Bridge EXPANDING Freight Capacity 15 • Charleston Harbor Deepening • Hugh K. Leatherman Port Terminal • Navy Base Intermodal Facility • Port Access Road STORM Water Management 18 • Crosstown Drainage Project • Church Creek Basin Infrastructure Policy Principles Infrastructure is essential to economic vitality. The Charleston Metro Region has enjoyed incredible economic success over the past decade, but our transportation capacity hasn’t kept up. To continue growing jobs and economic opportunity, we must enhance the capacity of our transportation network and make necessary investments in freight movement and storm water management. Infrastructure All modes o F enhances quality transportation o F life. are important to regional competitiveness. Enhancements to our infrastructure should Employers rely on roads and bridges to move protect our historic assets, minimize impact people and products. Businesses also rely on to the environment and help more citizens other modes of transportation including rail, access jobs and amenities while spending air service and shipping. Meanwhile, residents less time in traffic. Because of our strategic increasingly expect more options including location on the coast, the Charleston transit, walkability and bike enhancements. region must plan for resiliency of our Planners must take a holistic approach when transportation and infrastructure systems evaluating the region’s current and future in the face of natural disaster and persistent transportation needs and tie transportation flooding threats. planning with land-use planning. Continued need for all sources o F funding and financing. The infrastructure funding bill, passed by the State General Assembly in 2017, is a huge victory for South Carolina and the Charleston region. The projected $630 million annually in new revenue it generates will significantly improve funding for maintenance and expansion of existing roadways and will help complete many existing priority road improvements. But it does not solve all of our infrastructure funding problems. Creating the regional transportation system employers and residents demand will also require significant funds for new construction and smart financing solutions. The region’s leaders must continue to prudently invest revenue from county sales taxes, seek federal matching dollars and leverage funds and financing support from the State Infrastructure Bank and other sources. 1 Project Selection Criteria The projects highlighted in this publication are carefully vetted and ultimately selected by the Charleston Metro Chamber’s Infrastructure Vision Committee. The projects in this document were evaluated against the following criteria: • Accommodate Anticipated Growth • Facilitate Freight Movement • Advocate for Feasible and Fundable Solutions • Promote Economic Development • Enhance Region-wide Connectivity • Preserve and Enhance Quality of Life All projects included in this document are top priorities and the order of presentation is not a ranking. ABOUT US Charleston Metro Chamber With approximately 1,600 member organizations representing 160,000 professionals, the Charleston Metro Chamber serves as the collective voice of the tri-county business community and a catalyst for regional economic advancement and member success. Infrastructure Vision COMMITTEE Originally established as a task force in 2011, the Infrastructure Vision Committee studies the region’s short- and long-term infrastructure needs and advises the Chamber’s Board about priority projects. The Committee is made up of large employers and private-sector leaders with backgrounds in engineering, construction, planning and resource management. Their first Infrastructure Priorities report was published in 2013 and has been updated regularly. 2 College Park Road to Jedburg Road Berlin Myers Parkway - Phase 3 Highway 78 Widening Red Bank Road Palmetto Commerce Interchange I-526 Widening and Interchange Palmetto Commerce Improvements Parkway - Phase 3 Navy Base Airport Intermodal Connector Facility Road Church Creek Port Drainage Basin I-26 Widening Access Hugh K. and Improvements Road Leatherman Port Terminal Glenn McConnell Lowcountry Parkway Extension Rapid Transit Highway 17 Crosstown and Main Road Drainage Interchange Mark Clark Expressway Ashley River Completion Non-Motorized Bridge Charleston Harbor Deepening Sea Islands Greenway 5 Highway 41 Corridor Improvement Billy Swails Boulevard Extension Priority Projects Map New Road Construction STORM Water Management ImprovING Existing RoadS ENHANCING MASS TRANSIT ExpanDING Freight Capacity BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS 4 Continued population growth, the desire to preserve open land, traffic congestion and shifting resident expectations practically demand a future with more and better mass transit options. If coupled with appropriate zoning changes to allow walkable commercial and residential development, the envisioned Lowcountry Rapid Transit (LCRT) line, connecting downtown Summerville with the Charleston Peninsula along the Rivers Avenue corridor, holds tremendous promise. ENHANCING MASS TRANSIT 5 LOWCOUNTRY Rapid Transit Description: A 23-mile bus rapid transit (BRT) line connecting downtown Summerville, North Charleston and the Charleston Peninsula. Functioning like “light rail on rubber tires,” this mass transit system will operate a fleet of buses in dedicated lanes along the Rivers Avenue corridor (U.S. 78/U.S. 52). The line will provide an alternative to Interstate 26 for commuters. Purpose: Create a “spine” for Charleston’s mass transit system along the most heavily traveled commuter corridor in the region. The envisioned 18-stop line would offer opportunities for connecting service to employment centers, transit-oriented development and park-and-ride facilities at certain stations. The goal is to reduce vehicle congestion in the I-26 Corridor and offer residents the opportunity for a car-optional commute. A BRT system is the most feasible mass transit option for our area in terms of cost and capacity. It features dedicated lanes and traffic signal prioritization. It has the added benefit of flexibility because rubber tire buses can go into mixed traffic when needed. Status: Preliminary engineering and planning are underway. The project must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Construction is estimated to be complete in 2025. Estimated Cost: $360 million Funding: The Charleston County 2016 Half-Cent Transportation Sales Tax referendum pledges $250 million for transit. That funding will be used as the local match to apply for funding from the Federal Transit Administration’s Capital Investment Grant program. The Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments is managing the Lowcountry Rapid Transit project. Downtown Summerville PROPOSED CORRIDOR Berlin Myers P * The station locations and route shown are not Lincolnville P intended to signify the final approved station College Park / Fairgrounds P locations or route. The process of station location and route determination is still underway. Trident Health / CSU P Otranto P Northwoods Mall Trident Technical College Key Remount Segment 1 North Charleston City Center Segment 2 Liberty Hill / Amtrak Segment 3 Shipwatch Square T Segment 4 Stromboli Design Variant Magnolia Segment 5 Upper Peninsula Station Area Romney Street P Park & Ride Huger Street T Transit Center Line Street T 6 Given our region’s consistent, steady growth and a long history of underfunding infrastructure, new road capacity remains a dominate need. All of these new road construction projects will have a profound impact on traffic and mobility region-wide, but two are above the rest in scale, scope and transformative impact: completion of the Mark Clark Expressway and extension of the Glenn McConnell Parkway. Once completed, the Mark Clark Expressway will provide a safe evacuation route for residents of James and Johns Islands. It will also alleviate choke points at Main Road and Folly Road and take hundreds of daily commuters off surface streets in West Ashley and Downtown Charleston. Extending the Glenn McConnell Parkway from its current end at Bees Ferry Road in West Ashley to U.S. 17A west of Summerville will create an important alternative north-south route that will alleviate volume on I-26. It will also help protect the scenic and historic Ashley River area along Hwy 61. New Road Construction 7 College Park Road Airport Connector Road to Jedburg Road Description: Description: A new three-mile multi-lane roadway that provides a new route to the Extend College Park Road from where it currently terminates airport. The roadway is expected to start at W. Montague Ave and at U.S. 17A in Western Berkeley County, connecting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RURAL ADDRESS SIGNS Revised: DEC 2006 Page 1 of 3 PART HIGHWAY SIGNS RECOMMENDED SECTION GUIDE and INFORMATION SIGNS PRACTICES SUB-SECTION
    Issued: DEC 2003 RURAL ADDRESS SIGNS Revised: DEC 2006 Page 1 of 3 PART HIGHWAY SIGNS RECOMMENDED SECTION GUIDE AND INFORMATION SIGNS PRACTICES SUB-SECTION General road is numbered accordingly. In 1979, Strathcona County developed a New township road numbers are assigned by rural address system to assist emergency adding a zero to the township number. The services in quickly locating residences and intermediate Township Roads (road developments in rural areas. The rural allowances) are numbered sequentially at address system also provided a convenient two-mile intervals. method for motorists to locate residences and rural businesses without the clutter of Ranges are numbered sequentially from east directional signage at major highway to west, starting from the longitudinal intersections. meridian lines (4th, 5th or 6th meridian). New Range Road numbers are assigned by The Strathcona County address system adding a zero to the range number. The provided the basis for the rural address intermediate range roads (road allowances) system, which is presently used across the are numbered sequentially at one-mile province and is described in the following intervals. guidelines. In urban areas, different addressing systems may be used, as Forced Road Allowances determined by the municipality. While many rural roads in Alberta form part Other rural address systems may exist in of the survey grid road system, other roads Alberta, such as M.D. of Foothills’ rural street are irregular and simply follow rivers, numbering system, which is an extension of streams or the topography of the land. the City of Calgary’s urban system. The type These roads are usually assigned an of addressing system to be used should be auxiliary township road number or range discussed with the rural municipality prior to road number based on the alignment of the installation.
    [Show full text]
  • Acorn Lane 1600 Oak Ridge Rd Cul-De-Sac 4.35 Aspen Crest 700 Mere Wind Dr
    Street Distance Beginning Point End Point 1998 PCR Acorn Lane 1600 Oak Ridge Rd Cul-de-Sac 4.35 Aspen Crest 700 Mere Wind Dr. Cul-de-Sac 0.00 Balsam Drive 1460 Hemlock -East Hemlock - West 4.59 Bea Lane 915 Grove St. Main St 4.24 Birch Lane A 465 Concord Circle Pavement Change 3.94 Birch Lane B 990 Pavement Change Ocean Terr 3.09 Blackstrap Road 6356 Falmouth TL Route 100 Blanchard Rd Ext A 983 Skillin Rd Pavement Change 3.26 Blanchard Rd Ext B 309 Pavement Change Pavement Change 3.26 Blanchard Rd Ext C 700 Pavement Change Skillin 3.26 Blanchard Road A 5874 Blanchard Rd Ext Pavement Change Blanchard Road B 8941 Pavement Change Main St Blue Heron 315 Ledge Ln Dead End 4.60 Broadmoor Drive 815 Willow Lane Tuttle Rd 4.25 Brookside Dr 895 Greely Rd Dead End 4.80 Bruce Hill Road 1 5100 Blanchard Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 3.00 Bruce Hill Road 2 5880 Blanchard Rd Range Rd 2.89 Bruce Hill Road 3 1900 Range Rd Dead End 3.97 Candlewick Lane 645 Country Charm Dead End 2.53 Carol Street 390 Woodside Hillcrest St 3.89 Carriage Rd 2500 Route 88 Dead End 4.05 Chet's Way 2975 Tuttle Rd. Dead End 0.00 Concord Circle 305 Wildwood Birch Lane 4.60 Conifer Ridge Road 1090 Route 88 Cul-de-Sac 3.94 Cottage Farms Road 955 Main St Dead End 4.80 Country Charm Road 1455 Val Halla Hedgrow Dr 3.65 Crestwood Road 1585 East Pinewood West Pinewood 2.39 Cross Road 1865 Winn Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • 02/19/2021 Campbell County Maintained Roads 1 NAME RD # from to LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE ADOPTED Alexandria Pike East CR 1304 Low Ga
    02/19/2021 Campbell County Maintained Roads 1 NAME RD # FROM TO LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE ADOPTED Alexandria Pike East CR 1304 Low Gap East KY 709 5,650 25 Blacktop Jan-93 Alexandria Pike West CR 1557 Dead End Dead End 14,225 25 Blacktop Jul-19 Aulick Road CR 1214 Hissem Road Fairlane Road 6,630 13 Blacktop Aug-87 Autumn Lane CR 1307 US 27 Dead End 1,150 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Avery Road CR 1111 KY 9 KY 2828 1,208 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Awesome Place CR 1512 Wolf Road Dead End 1,200 25 Blacktop Apr-02 Backus Drive CR 1305 US 27 Dead End 1,936 20 Blacktop Aug-87 Bakerfield Road CR 1221 Boone Smith Road Dead End 5,162 16 Blacktop Aug-87 Barrs Branch CR 1100 KY 10 KY 1121 7,437 16 Blacktop Aug-87 Baynum Hill CR 1114 KY 10 Dead End 3,656 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Belle Point Drive CR 1546 Pleasant Ridge Road Cul-de-sac 1,200 25 Blacktop May-06 Bezold Road CR 1120 Burns Road California Crossroads 6,480 16 Blacktop Aug-87 Birch Creek Road CR 1566 Darlington Creek Drive Dead End 240 25 Asphalt Feb-21 Black Road CR 1521 Eight Mile Road Dead End 2,300 11 Blacktop Aug-87 Blangey Road CR 1325 KY 8 Dead End 3,450 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Blossom Drive CR 1311 US 27 Dead End 1,100 20 Blacktop Aug-87 Blossom Lane CR 1360 US 27 Southgate City Limits 3,450 22 Blacktop Aug-87 Blue Sky Lane CR 1526 Poplar Thicket Dead End 980 10 Blacktop Aug-89 Bob Huber Drive CR 1246 Bud Pogue Way End of County Maintenance 800 24 Concrete Dec-89 Bob White Lane CR 1132 KY 10 Dead End 3,405 13 Blacktop Aug-87 Boone Smith Road CR 1222 Pleasant Ridge Road KY 1936 8,843 17 Blacktop Aug-87 Boyd Road
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Access Management Guidebook
    ReducingTrafficCongestion andImprovingTrafficSafety inMichiganCommunities: THE ACCESSMANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK COMMUNITYA COMMUNITYB Cover graphics and ROW graphic by John Warbach, Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. Photos by Tom Doyle, Michigan Department of Transportation. Speed Differential graphic by Michigan Department of Transportation. Road Hierarchy graphic by Rossman Martin & Associates, Inc. Reducing Traffic Congestion and Improving Traffic Safety in Michigan Communities: THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK October, 2001 Prepared by the Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. 715 N. Cedar Street Lansing, MI 48906-5206 517/886-0555 (tele), www.pzcenter.com Under contract to the Michigan Department of Transportation With the assistance of three Advisory Committees listed on the next page The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Michigan State Transportation Commission or the Michigan Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. Dedication This Guidebook is dedicated to the countless local elected officials, planning and zoning commissioners, zoning administrators, building inspectors, professional planners, and local, county and state road authority personnel who: • work tirelessly every day to make taxpayers investment in Michigan roads stretch as far as it can with the best possible result; and • who try to make land use decisions that build better communities without undermining the integrity of Michigan's road system. D:\word\access\title
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Involvement Summary With
    Prepared for Volume 2: Developing Vision 2040 Prepared by Phase 3 Stakeholder Involvement Summary with November 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Community Outreach .................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Targeted Outreach and Community Events ............................................................ 3 2.2 Social Media, News Media, and Paid Advertising ..................................................... 5 2.3 Print and Digital Survey Outreach ........................................................................ 7 2.4 Vision 2040 Open Houses ................................................................................... 7 3.0 Survey Summary ...................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Survey Questions and Responses ........................................................................ 11 3.2 General Comments ........................................................................................... 21 3.3 Respondent Characteristics ................................................................................ 22 4.0 Project Prioritization Workshops .............................................................................. 27 4.1 VTAC Workshop
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Range Roads 231 and 232
    Report for Range Roads 231 and 232 Response Counts Completion Rate: 96% Complete 24 Partial 1 Totals: 25 1. Which road do you primarily use? 42% Range Road 232 58% Range Road 231 Value Percent Responses Range Road 231 58.3% 14 Range Road 232 41.7% 10 Totals: 24 2. Are there features that you like about the roadways, and what are they? ResponseID Response 5 Low traffic, free flowing 6 I like that they are single lane. 7 increase number of lanes on range road 232 most important is street light on range road 232 if county provide services like water and sewerage residents will put there in puts as per county advice. that is very important because it help big time on people health by getting city water 8 Between Sherwood Park and hwy 14 it's nice and wide ResponseID Response 9 Traffic flows well 10 None 12 Faster access to Whitemud Freeway and Henday 13 It is a local collector and should remain this way. 14 It's paved 15 Quick access to highway 628 16 Has been good access for our commutes to date but don't like the heavier activity as a bypass road to the Whitemud freeway. 17 No 18 The turning lane in to Meadow Hawk. 19 I like there are no street lights on RR231. 20 Easy access 22 That they are paved. 25 Easy right hand turn onto 522 keeps traffic flow moving. 26 Easy right hand turn from 231 to 522 west bound 27 speed limit at 60/80km is good, but confusing near school zone at north end of RR 231.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Intersection This Fact Sheet Provides Guidance and Information Regarding Priority Intersections (Those Controlled by a Give Way Or Stop Sign)
    FACT SHEET FACT 7 Intersection Form – Priority Intersection This fact sheet provides guidance and information regarding priority intersections (those controlled by a give way or stop sign). Pros Cons • Low cost • Can be poor for cyclist and pedestrian safety • Low space requirements • On busy roads, pedestrian delays for crossing the road • No delays for major road through traffic may be excessive • When volumes on main road are high, can result in excessive delays and poorer safety outcomes for side road traffic Best Practice Considerations: • Crossing distances for pedestrians should be minimised • If cycle lanes are provided between blocks, these should be marked across the intersections • Where cycle lanes are provided on the major leg, the minor leg should be controlled by a give way or stop • Sight distances can dictate whether the intersection is uncontrolled, a give way or a stop • Some traffic turning movements can be banned to improve safety Basic A basic priority intersection treatment is where no right turning facilities are provided on the main road. In these layouts, turning traffic on the main road briefly blocks through traffic. These intersections are low cost due to the limited space required but can create safety issues if the traffic flows are heavy. Appropriate Locations • Intersections where the traffic volumes on the side road(s) are low • Low volume of right turning vehicles on the main road Limitations • Right turning vehicles on the main road impede through traffic • Vehicles turning out of the side street must find gaps in both directions of traffic. No turning bay Local examples: Roberts Street / Titiraupenga Street Flush Median A flush median is a painted area between traffic lanes which motorists can take refuge in while waiting to turn in/out of side roads or local accessways and where pedestrians can wait to cross the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads to Yukon Resources Feds, Territory Commit C$360 Million to Modernize Yukon Mining Roads
    Providing coverage of Alaska and Northwest Canada's mineral industry September 2017 Vol. 22, No. 37 Week of September 10, 2017 Mining News: Roads to Yukon resources Feds, territory commit C$360 million to modernize Yukon mining roads Shane Lasley Mining News Roads to some of Yukon’s richest mining districts are getting more than C$360 million in upgrades. Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rolled out the plans to invest in modern transportation infrastructure during a visit to the territory on Sep. 2. “Modern infrastructure is key to developing and properly managing the incredible natural resources we have at our fingertips,” Trudeau said. The prime minister pledged C$247.8 million to the Yukon Resource Gateway project, a program that will upgrade more than 650 kilometers of roads in the territory, and build or replace numerous bridges, culverts, and stream crossings in two minerals-rich regions of the Yukon. “The Resource Gateway is one of the most significant projects ever undertaken in this territory and will have an incredibly positive impact on the Yukon economy,” said Yukon Premier Sandy Silver. Following the development of project agreements with First Nations in regions of the proposed road upgrades, as well as the precursor environmental and socio-economic reviews, the Yukon will contribute up to C$112.8 million to the road project. “First Nation agreement is essential to the continuation of the project and we look forward to working in partnership with them on this milestone development,” Silver added. This unprecedented road improvement project will boost the mine projects nearing development and add extra fuel to the excitement for mineral exploration in Canada’s westernmost territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinellas County Transportation Design Manual, January 2021
    Transportation Design Manual January 2021 Transportation Design Manual CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 2 - REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 3 – TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES ...................................................................................... 7 3.1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 7 3.4 INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) ......................................................................... 8 3.5 GAP STUDY ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.6 INTERSECTION DELAY STUDY ................................................................................................... 8 3.7 TRAVEL TIME AND DELAY STUDY .............................................................................................. 8 3.8 NO-PASSING ZONE STUDY ......................................................................................................... 8 3.9 ADVISORY
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Transportation Master Plan
    The City of SPRUCE GROVE 2012 Transportation Master Plan May 2012 City of Spruce Grove 2012 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ............................................................................3 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN (TMP) ..............................3 1.3 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OTHER DOCUMENTS .............................4 1.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...............................................................................5 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................. 6 2.1 EXISTING ROAD NETWORK AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES .........................................6 2.2 EXISTING TRANSIT NETWORK AND PASSENGER VOLUMES .................................9 2.3 EXISTING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION (BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN) NETWORKS .... 12 2.4 EXISTING TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR IN SPRUCE GROVE ......................................... 14 3.0 TRANSPORTATION GOALS AND POLICIES ................................. 15 3.1 TRANSPORTATION GOALS ....................................................................... 16 3.2 TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES .............................................. 17 4.0 DEVELOPING THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ................ 22 4.1 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND FUTURE LAND USE ............................................. 22 4.2 TRANSPORTATION DIVERSITY ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saskatchewan Provinical Standard System of Rural Addressing
    300 – 10 Research Drive Regina, Canada S4S 7J7 Phone Ask ISC at 1-866-275-4721 www.isc .ca Saskatchewan Provincial Standard System of Rural Addressing Adopted by Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities (SARM) at the 2005 mid-term convention under the Rural Municipal Signing System Resolution No. 7-05M Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Required Attributes of an Addressing System ........................................................................... 1 Standard Address System ......................................................................................................... 2 Road Name................................................................................................................................... 2 Access Numbers...................................................................................................................................2 Unit Numbers.....................................................................................................................................3 Road Signage................................................................................................................................. 3 Figures ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 566 and Range Road 291 Rocky View County, Alberta
    Land For Sale N Highway 566 465 Acres Highway 566 and Range Road 291 Rocky View County, Alberta Property Highlights CONTACT AGENTS FOR MORE INFORMATION • Close proximity to Wagon Wheel Industrial Park, Target Distribution Centre and Cross Iron Mills Shopping Centre. Luke Stiles • Possible land uses: Industrial, Commercial or +1 403 984 9805 [email protected] Residential Development • Vendor will consider the sale of individual quarter Daniel Goldstrom sections. +1 403 984 6300 [email protected] Commercial Real Estate Services, Worldwide. This property is not formally listed by Advent Commercial Real Estate Corp. operating as NAI Advent.This brochure is intended for information purposes 833 34th Avenue SE only and should not be relied upon for accurate factual information by the recipients hereof. The information contained herein is based on information which Advent Commercial Real Estate Corp. operating as NAI Advent deems reliable, however, Advent Commercial Real Estate Corp. operating as NAI Calgary, Alberta T2G 4Y9 Advent assumes no responsibility for the degree of accuracy of such information, nor does Advent Commercial Real Estate Corp. operating as NAI Advent represent or warrant the information contained herein. Recipients hereof should conduct their own investigations to determine the accuracy of in- +1 403 984 9800 formation contained herein. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. NAI ADVENT. All rights reserved. No reproduction, dis- Commercial Real Estate Services, Worldwide. tribution,
    [Show full text]