DOCSLIB.ORG

The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Brands February 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Brands February 2017 Global 500 2017 The annual report on the world’s most valuable brands February 2017 Brand Finance Global 500 February 2017 1. Foreword Contents steady downward spiral of poor communication, Definitions 4 wasted resources and a negative impact on the bottom line. Methodology 6 Executive Summary 8 Brand Finance bridges the gap between the marketing and financial worlds. Our teams have Full Table 18 experience across a wide range of disciplines from market research and visual identity to tax Understand Your Brand’s Value 28 and accounting. We understand the importance of design, advertising and marketing, but we How We Can Help 30 also believe that the ultimate and overriding Contact Details 31 purpose of brands is to make money. That is why we connect brands to the bottom line. By valuing brands, we provide a mutually intelligible language for marketers and finance teams. David Haigh, CEO Marketers then have the ability to communicate Brand Finance the significance of what they do and boards can use the information to chart a course that maximises profits. Without knowing the precise, What is the purpose of a strong brand; to attract financial value of an asset, how can you know if customers, to build loyalty, to motivate staff? All you are maximising your returns? If you are true, but for a commercial brand at least, the first intending to license a brand, how can you know answer must always be ‘to make money’. Huge you are getting a fair price? If you are intending investments are made in the design, launch and to sell, how do you know what the right time is? ongoing promotion of brands. Given their How do you decide which brands to discontinue, potential financial value, this makes sense. whether to rebrand and how to arrange your Unfortunately, most organisations fail to go brand architecture? Brand Finance has beyond that, missing huge opportunities to conducted thousands of brand and branded- effectively make use of what are often their most business valuations to help answer these important assets. Monitoring of brand questions. performance should be the next step, but is often sporadic. Where it does take place it Brand Finance’s recently conducted share price frequently lacks financial rigour and is heavily study revealed the compelling link between reliant on qualitative measures poorly strong brands and stock market performance. It understood by non-marketers. As a result, was found that investing in the most highly marketing teams struggle to communicate the branded companies would lead to a return value of their work and boards then almost double that of the average for the S&P underestimate the significance of their brands to 500 as a whole. Acknowledging and managing a the business. Skeptical finance teams, company’s intangible assets taps into the hidden unconvinced by what they perceive as marketing value that lies within it. The following report is a mumbo jumbo may fail to agree necessary first step to understanding more about brands, investments. What marketing spend there is can how to value them and how to use that end up poorly directed as marketers are left to information to benefit the business. The team operate with insufficient financial guidance or and I look forward to continuing the conversation accountability. The end result can be a slow but with you. 2. Brand Finance GlobalAirlines 500 30 30February February 20162017 2015 Brand Finance Global 500 February 2017 2. Brand Finance Global 500 February 2017 3. Definitions Effect of a Brand on Stakeholders Definitions E.g. + Enterprise Value – the value of the Unilever entire enterprise, made up of Directors Potential Middle ‘Branded‘Branded multiple branded businesses Customers Managers Enterprise’Enterprise’ Existing All Other ‘Branded‘Branded + Branded Business Value – the Customers Employees Business’ E.g. Business’ Persil value of a single branded business operating under the subject brand ‘Brand’ Contribution’ Influencers Production + Brand Contribution– The total e.g. Media Brand E.g. economic benefit derived by a Persil business from its brand ‘Brand Value’ Trade Sales Channels + Brand Value – the value of the Persil trade marks (and relating Strategic marketing IP and ‘goodwill’ Debt Allies & providers attached to it) within the branded Suppliers Investors business Branded Business Value Brand Contribution Brand Value Brand Strength A brand should be viewed in the context of the The brand values contained in our league In the very broadest sense, a brand is the focus Brand Strength is the part of our analysis most business in which it operates. For this reason tables are those of the potentially transferable for all the expectations and opinions held by directly and easily influenced by those Brand Finance always conducts a Branded brand asset only, but for marketers and customers, staff and other stakeholders about responsible for marketing and brand Business Valuation as part of any brand managers alike. An assessment of overall an organisation and its products and services. management. In order to determine the valuation. Where a company has a purely mono- brand contribution to a business provides However, when looking at brands as business strength of a brand we have developed the branded architecture, the business value is the powerful insights to help optimise performance. assets that can be bought, sold and licensed, a Brand Strength Index (BSI). We analyse same as the overall company value or more technical definition is required. marketing investment, brand equity (the ‘enterprise value’. Brand Contribution represents the overall uplift goodwill accumulated with customers, staff and in shareholder value that the business derives Brand Finance helped to craft the internationally other stakeholders) and finally the impact of In the more usual situation where a company from owning the brand rather than operating a recognised standard on Brand Valuation, ISO those on business performance. owns multiple brands, business value refers to generic brand. 10668. That defines a brand as “a marketing- the value of the assets and revenue stream of related intangible asset including, but not limited Following this analysis, each brand is assigned the business line attached to that brand Brands affect a variety of stakeholders, not just to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos and a BSI score out of 100, which is fed into the specifically. We evaluate the full brand value customers but also staff, strategic partners, designs, or a combination of these, intended to brand value calculation. Based on the score, chain in order to understand the links between regulators, investors and more, having a identify goods, services or entities, or a each brand in the league table is assigned a marketing investment, brand tracking data, significant impact on financial value beyond combination of these, creating distinctive rating between AAA+ and D in a format similar stakeholder behaviour and business value to what can be bought or sold in a transaction. images and associations in the minds of to a credit rating. AAA+ brands are maximise the returns business owners can stakeholders, thereby generating economic exceptionally strong and well managed while a obtain from their brands. benefits/value” failing brand would be assigned a D grade. 4. Brand Finance Global 500 February 2017 Brand Finance Global 500 February 2017 5. Methodology League Table Valuation Methodology Brand Finance Typical Project Approach Brand Finance calculates the values of the 2 Determine the royalty rate range for the respective brands in its league tables using the brand sectors. This is done by reviewing ‘Royalty Relief approach’. This approach comparable licensing agreements sourced from involves estimating the likely future sales that are Brand Finance’s extensive database of license attributable to a brand and calculating a royalty agreements and other online databases. Brand Equity Stakeholder Brand Inputs Performance rate that would be charged for the use of the 3 Calculate royalty rate. The brand strength score is Value Drivers Behaviour Contribution brand, i.e. what the owner would have to pay for applied to the royalty rate range to arrive at a royalty the use of the brand—assuming it were not rate. For example, if the royalty rate range in a already owned. brand’s sector is 1-5% and a brand has a brand strength score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate 1 2 3 4 The steps in this process are as follows: royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given Brand Audit Trial & Preference Acquisition & Valuation Modelling sector will be 4.2%. Retention 1 Calculate brand strength on a scale of 0 to 100 4 Determine brand specific revenues estimating a based on a number of attributes such as emotional proportion of parent company revenues attributable Audit the impact Run analytics to Link stakeholder Model the impact of behaviour on connection, financial performance and sustainability, to a specific brand. of brand understand how behaviour with core financial performance and among others. This score is known as the Brand management and perceptions link to key financial isolating the value of the brand 5 Determine forecast brand specific revenues using a Strength Index, and is calculated using brand data investment on behaviour value drivers contribution function of historic revenues, equity analyst from the BrandAsset® Valuator database, the brand equity forecasts and economic growth rates. world’s largest database of brands, which measures 6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to brand equity, consideration and emotional imagery derive brand revenues. attributes to assess brand personality in a category 7 Brand revenues are discounted post tax to a net agnostic manner. present value which equals the brand value. Brand strength Brand Brand revenues Brand value How We Help to Maximise Value index ‘Royalty rate’ (BSI) 6. Build scale through licensing/franchising/partnerships Brand Strong brand investment 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomy of Brand Valuation Methodologies: How Different Types of Methodologies Can Help to Answer Different Types of Questions
    A Taxonomy of Brand Valuation Methodologies: How different types of methodologies can help to answer different types of questions Gabriela Salinas, Global Brand Manager, Deloitte and Tim Ambler, Senior Fellow, London Business School Abstract Brands can be valued using a variety of techniques. Like any tool, each technique may be suitable for some purposes and not for others. This paper classifies the methodologies according to the approach and premises they adopt and suitability for different types of applications. We also indicate flaws in methodologies either in general or for particular purposes. Classification is complicated by specialist firms seeking to differentiate methodologies (“proprietary models”) for their own marketing purposes. Much of this differentiation is little more than re-labeling. The 24 methods of brand valuation, and 52 specialist providers, garnered from the literature represent possibly hundreds of commercial and academic approaches by the multitude of providers around the world. After removing those that do not appear to be used in practice we were left with 18 practical methods which we analyze and classify. This taxonomy is intended as a guide to current and potential users of brand valuation through the jungle that the proliferation of proprietary brand valuation techniques has created. May 14, 2008 Contact: [email protected], [email protected] © 2008 Gabriela Salinas and Tim Ambler A Taxonomy of Brand Valuation Methodologies: How different types of methodologies can help to answer different types of questions Since the 1980s, marketers have been under increasing pressure for “accountability” in two senses: being responsible for the results from marketing activity and reporting those results using the language of finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Finance
    Australia 100 2019 The annual report on the most valuable and strongest Australian brands January 2019 Contents. About Brand Finance 4 Get in Touch 4 Request Your Brand Value Report 5 Foreword 6 Brand Value Analysis 8 Brand Strength Index Analysis 11 Sector Reputation Analysis 12 Brand Finance Australia 100 (AUD m) 14 Definitions 16 Brand Valuation Methodology 18 Market Research Methodology 19 Stakeholder Equity Measures 19 Consulting Services 20 Brand Evaluation Services 21 Communications Services 22 Brand Finance Network 24 Brand Finance Australia 100 January 2019 3 Request Your About Brand Finance. Brand Value Report. Brand Finance is the world’s leading independent A Brand Value Report provides a complete Each report includes expert recommendations for growing brand valuation and strategy consultancy. breakdown of the assumptions, data sources, and brand value to drive business performance and offers a calculations used to arrive at your brand’s value. cost-effective way to gaining a better understanding of Brand Finance was set up in 1996 with the aim of ‘bridging your position against competitors. the gap between marketing and finance’. For more than 20 years, we have helped companies and organisations of all types to connect their brands to the bottom line. We pride ourselves on four key strengths: What is a Brand Value Report? What are the benefits of a Brand Value Report? + Independence + Transparency Brand Valuation Summary + Technical Credibility + Expertise + Internal understanding of brand + Brand value tracking We put thousands of the world’s biggest brands to the + Competitor benchmarking Insight test every year, evaluating which are the strongest and + Historical brand value most valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Report on the Most Valuable British Brands April 2017
    United Kingdom 150 2017 The annual report on the most valuable British brands April 2017 Foreword. Contents steady downward spiral of poor communication, Foreword 2 wasted resources and a negative impact on the bottom line. Definitions 4 Methodology 6 Brand Finance bridges the gap between the marketing and financial worlds. Our teams have Excecutive Summary 8 experience across a wide range of disciplines from market research and visual identity to tax and Full Tables (GPBm & USDm) 14 accounting. We understand the importance of design, advertising and marketing, but we also Understand Your Brand’s Value 20 believe that the ultimate and overriding purpose of How We Can Help 22 brands is to make money. That is why we connect brands to the bottom line. Contact Details 23 By valuing brands, we provide a mutually intelligible language for marketers and finance teams. David Haigh, CEO, Brand Finance Marketers then have the ability to communicate the significance of what they do and boards can use What is the purpose of a strong brand; to attract the information to chart a course that maximises customers, to build loyalty, to motivate staff? All profits. true, but for a commercial brand at least, the first Without knowing the precise, financial value of an answer must always be ‘to make money’. asset, how can you know if you are maximising your returns? If you are intending to license a brand, how Huge investments are made in the design, launch can you know you are getting a fair price? If you are and ongoing promotion of brands.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Brand Management
    Brand management is the application of marketing techniques to a specific product, product line, or brand. It seeks to increase a product's perceived value to the customer and thereby increase brand franchise and brand equity. Marketers see a brand as an implied promise that the level of quality people have come to expect from a brand will continue with future purchases of the same product. This may increase sales by making a comparison with competing products more favorable. It may also enable the manufacturer to charge more for the product. The value of the brand is determined by the amount of profit it generates for the manufacturer. This can result from a combination of increased sales and increased price, and/or reduced COGS (cost of goods sold), and/or reduced or more efficient marketing investment. All of these enhancements may improve the profitability of a brand, and thus, "Brand Managers" often carry line-management accountability for a brand's P&L (Profit and Loss) profitability, in contrast to marketing staff manager roles, which are allocated budgets from above, to manage and execute. In this regard, Brand Management is often viewed in organizations as a broader and more strategic role than Marketing alone. The annual list of the world’s most valuable brands, published by Interbrand and Business Week, indicates that the market value of companies often consists largely of brand equity. Research by McKinsey & Company, a global consulting firm, in 2000 suggested that strong, well-leveraged brands produce higher returns to shareholders than weaker, narrower brands.[citation needed] Taken together, this means that brands seriously impact shareholder value, which ultimately makes branding a CEO responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Architecture Strategy and Firm Value: How Leveraging, Separating, and Distancing the Corporate Brand Affects Risk and Returns
    J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. (2016) 44:261–280 DOI 10.1007/s11747-014-0422-5 ORIGINAL EMPIRICAL RESEARCH Brand architecture strategy and firm value: how leveraging, separating, and distancing the corporate brand affects risk and returns Liwu Hsu & Susan Fournier & Shuba Srinivasan Received: 27 November 2013 /Accepted: 2 December 2014 /Published online: 20 January 2015 # Academy of Marketing Science 2015 Abstract Despite evidence suggesting a growing inci- implications for practice. Our results show that risk/ dence of brand architecture strategies beyond the branded return tradeoffs for sub-branding, endorsed branding, house (e.g., Boeing and IBM) and house-of-brands (e.g., and the BH-HOB hybrid differ significantly from what P&G with Tide and Cheer), and recognition that in prac- common wisdom suggests. tice these strategies are very different, there is still a need for research on how financial markets value the full range Keywords Branding . Brand architecture . Brand portfolio of brand architecture strategies pursued by firms. We strategy . Firm performance . Shareholder value . Abnormal replicate and extend Rao et al.’s(Journal of Marketing, returns . Risk . Time-series econometrics 68(4), 126-141, 2004) investigation of brand portfolio strategy and firm performance by (1) adding sub- branding and endorsed branding architectures, (2) clarify- ing the “mixed” architecture to constitute a BH-HOB Introduction hybrid and remove sub- and endorsed branding variants, and (3) quantifying the impact of a company’sbrand Previous papers (Bahadir et al. 2008; Bharadwaj et al. 2011; architecture strategy on stock risk in addition to returns. Morgan and Rego 2009;Regoetal.2009; Wiles et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Valuation a Case Study on Lindt & Sprüngli
    MAJEURE FINANCE Brand Valuation A case study on Lindt & Sprüngli Daniel Llobet & Alejo López-Balcells, supervised by Professor Patrick Legland June 2019 2 ABSTRACT Typically absent from financial statements, the brand of a company remains most times in the dark of finance. After all, it is the unconscious rationale behind consumers´ or employees´ choices for a product or a company, and how would you capitalize that? Some would say it is even esoteric. Nevertheless, its importance cannot be undermined. Brands are the most important individual asset of many companies and, as such, to know its value can be key for the company´s decision making. Built through years of investments in recognition, the brand is associated with certain product characteristics such as quality or price, but also eco- friendliness or fair trade. Perception, therefore, is key to understand its value. We have tried in this research paper to gather the predominant valuation methods in the industry, using them to value Lindt as brand. The broad range of results yielded by the different methods must not come as a surprise; as mentioned, the value is dependent on the evaluator´s perception of the brand. While some of the methods provide different solutions to try to objectivize this perception, this remains a subjective task after all. As a result, the main objective of this paper is to evaluate the relevance of each method, providing recommendations on the conditions to use one or the other. 3 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 THE IMPORTANCE OF BRAND VALUATION ......................................................................... 10 1.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Describing the Customers' Perception of Unilever's Dualithic Approach
    Describing the Customers’ Perception of Unilever’s Dualithic Approach has had on its Sub-Brands’ Brand Equity Student Name: Jayd Twiddy Student Number: 13022033 Vega School of Brand Leadership Supervisor: Sharon Ballack Alec Bozas Course: BA Honours in Strategic Brand Communication Module Name: Research Methodology Module Code: RESM8419 Due Date: 16 October 2017 DECLARATION I, Jayd Lynne Twiddy declare that this dissertation is of my own original work. Any secondary research material that has been used throughout this dissertation is peer reviewed, either a print source or from the Internet. I understand plagiarism is the use of another person’s work, ideas, and words without appropriate acknowledgement and I am aware of the department’s policy in this regard. All sources are acknowledged and referenced using the required Harvard reference style. Student Number: 13 02 20 33 Date: 16 October 2017 ______________________ Signed: J.L Twiddy II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to say a special thanks to the following people who made this research paper possible: Sharon Ballack (Supervisor), your knowledge and passion for the subject truly guided me through every stage of this research paper. I would not have been able to do this dissertation without you. Alec Bozas (Supervisor), your dedication and support as a lecturer, ensured I was always on track and prepared for any situation. III GLOSSARY OF TERMS Brand Equity: Brand equity is viewed as the inherent or perceived value of a brand, which depends on the customer's’ interaction over time with the brand and the perception consumers build based on their positive or negative experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Brands March 2011
    Brand Finance® Global 500 The annual report on the world’s most valuable brands March 2011 Foreword Since it was first released in 2007, the BrandFinance® The value of the world’s top 500 brands continues Global 500 has been the most comprehensive table its impressive recovery from the drop in 2009 of US$707 billion. The value of the top 500 as a whole of published brand values. The study is released grew by 14% to US$3,306 billion. There are several annually and incorporates data from all listed interesting trends to draw out from this. companies globally. Each brand has been accorded a brand rating: a benchmarking study of the strength, The banking sector continues a steady drive towards risk and future potential of the brand relative to its rehabilitation in the eyes of consumers, having seen competitor set as well as a brand value: a summary the largest brand value increase of any sector - measure of the financial strength of the brand. US$90 billion. By contrast, the brands of sectors specialising in consumer goods have not fared so well. The brand value of Coca-Cola has fallen by US$9 billion, reflecting a drop in the beverage sector as a whole. Wal-mart, which has topped the BrandFinance® Global 500 for two years running, has this year fallen to third place. As well as highlighting the declining power of retail, the two companies which have overtaken it, Google and Microsoft, reflect the growing power of technology-led brands. These two companies, along with rival Apple, have all boosted their brand value by over US$8 billion while other technology and telecoms firms have also produced impressive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Valuation Model: a Shareholder Value Approach
    BRAND VALUATION MODEL: A SHAREHOLDER VALUE APPROACH A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University Graduate School of Management In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Hyunjung Lee April, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation advisor, Dr. Michael Hu, and my committee members, Dr. Murali Shanker and Dr. Tuo Wang for their support and guidance and confidence in me. I would also like to thank Dr. Sungha Jang for his assistance with statistics and SAS programing. I am very grateful for the support from my friends and colleagues in the doctoral program. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my dear husband, Brian and beloved daughter, Sidney. Without a doubt, I would not be able to finish my dissertation without them and their support. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Chapter 1. Brand Value 1 Introduction 1 Literature Review 4 Brand and Brand Value 4 Brand Value Measure 5 Brand Value and Firm Value 21 Brand Value in M&A 23 Brand Valuation Model in M&A 24 Summary 25 Problem Statement 26 Purpose of Dissertation 27 Dissertation Outline 28 Chapter 2. Brand Value in Mergers & Acquisitions 29 Introduction 29 Brand Value Measures in M&A 30 The Acquirer Perspective 30 The Shareholder Perspective 31 Brand Valuation Models in M&A 33 Summary 35 iv Chapter 3. Methodology 36 Introduction 36 Sample 36 Data Source 39 Measures 40 Model Overview 43 Acquirer Perspective Brand Valuation Model 44 Shareholder Perspective Brand Valuation Model 46 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Set the Right Royalty Rate
    IAM ISSUE 12_TEXT 23:05:05 16:19 Page 40 Royalty rates Feature Set the right royalty rate Although not a big amount in itself, the royalty rate a brand attracts can lead to significant income for its owner. It therefore pays to make sure that you get the figure right Licensing might be the core activity of a By Thayne Forbes business, it might be a deliberate exploitation of dormant intellectual property, it might be a Changing a royalty rate by just a fraction of a strategy for markets which cannot be as well percentage point can mean the difference developed otherwise, or it might be a strategy between merely covering costs and generating for non-core product. So, as an example, the huge profits. It is, therefore, of fundamental royalty rate for Smirnoff within a distribution importance to both licensee and licensor that arrangement for the Japanese vodka market the royalty rate reasonably reflects the might be, say, 40%, very different from a strength of the brand in a defined sector and royalty rate for the same brand in the US territory in relation to its competitors, and is confectionery market (say 5%). set by recognising the correct point on the Within a licence agreement, the royalty supply chain. rate may be interlinked with other factors, There are a number of factors that can be most notably minimum royalty commitments applied to determine an appropriate royalty and decreased royalty rates, once certain rate which deserve attention. First, the volumes are reached. Minimum royalties are commercial context within which royalty rates often a commitment for some form of exist needs examination to engender a full exclusivity or access to the brand in a market.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Brand Identity
    Designing Brand Identity Cover design: Jon Bjornson This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2013 by Alina Wheeler. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Report on the Most Valuable and Strongest Retail Brands March 2019 About Brand Finance
    Retail 50 2019The annual report on the most valuable and strongest retail brands March 2019 About Brand Finance. Contents. Brand Finance is the world’s leading independent About Brand Finance 2 brand valuation and strategy consultancy. Get in Touch 2 Brand Finance was set up in 1996 with the aim of ‘bridging Request Your Brand Value Report 4 the gap between marketing and finance’. For more than 20 years, we have helped companies and organisations of Brand Valuation Methodology 5 all types to connect their brands to the bottom line. Foreword 6 We pride ourselves on four key strengths: Brand Finance Retail 50 (USD m) 12 + Independence + Transparency + Technical Credibility + Expertise Regional Analysis 14 We put thousands of the world’s biggest brands to the Sector Reputation Analysis 16 test every year, evaluating which are the strongest and most valuable. Brand Strength Analysis 18 Brand Finance helped craft the internationally Definitions 20 recognised standard on Brand Valuation – ISO 10668, and the recently approved standard on Brand Evaluation Consulting Services 22 – ISO 20671. Brand Evaluation Services 23 Communications Services 24 Get in Touch. Brand Finance Network 26 For business enquiries, please contact: Richard Haigh Managing Director [email protected] For media enquiries, please contact: Sehr Sarwar Global Forum 2019 Senior Communications Manager [email protected] For all other enquiries, please contact: Understanding the Value of [email protected] Geographic Branding +44 (0)207 389 9400 2 April 2019 For more information, please visit our website: www.brandfinance.com Join us at the Brand Finance Global Forum, an action-packed day-long event at the Royal Automobile Club in London, as we explore how linkedin.com/company/brand-finance geographic branding can impact brand value, attract customers, and influence key stakeholders.
    [Show full text]