The Topic of the Universal in the Thought of the Cappadocian Fathers and in the Arian Debate of the 4Th Century AD: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Topic of the Universal in the Thought of the Cappadocian Fathers and in the Arian Debate of the 4Th Century AD: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives Sede Amministrativa: UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA Dipartimento di: FILOSOFIA, SOCIOLOGIA, PEDAGOGIA E PSICOLOGIA APPLICATA Scuola Di Dottorato Di Ricerca in: FILOSOFIA Indirizzo: UNICO Ciclo: XXVIII The topic of the universal in the thought of the Cappadocian Fathers and in the Arian debate of the 4th century AD: philosophical and theological perspectives Direttore della Scuola: CH.MA PROF.SSA FRANCESCA MENEGONI Supervisore: CH.MA PROF.SSA MARIA GRAZIA CREPALDI Dottorando: DMITRII BIRIUKOV ABSTRACT Nella tesi si dimostra come il tema dell’universale si sia manifestato principalmente nelle controversie ariane del quarto secolo e nei lavori dei padri cappadoci, come anche nella filosofia antica e nella tradizione orientale cristiana filosofica e teologica. Parlando dell’“universale”, intendo realtà universali di ogni tipo (incluse le proprietà comuni a molti individui come i principi trascendentali applicati ai tipi di essere ad essi partecipanti, i legami della gerarchia dell’essere tra cui la moltitudine degli individui ecc.) e non solo i termini di κοινόν e καθόλου o la nozione di un universale inteso nel senso tecnico normativo dal punto di vista dell’uso del termine nel discorso storico e filosofico. Nella tesi possono essere individuati tre temi principali. In primo luogo, il tema della partecipazione. Distinguo tre paradigmi della partecipazione rispetto al problema dell’universale caratteristici della filosofia antica: il paradigma platonico, aristotelico e neoplatonico. Dimostro che il paradigma platonico trova espressione in Origene, Ario e Gregorio di Nissa, quello aristotelico in Origene e Gregorio di Nissa e quello neoplatonico, come propongo, in Ario. In secondo luogo si tratta il tema dell’applicazione della divisione genera-species all’essere intelligente. Ricostruisco la storia intellettuale della seconda tappa delle controversie ariane per cui, in risposta alla dottrina di Vasilio di Cesarea sul fatto che la comunanza dell’identità della Trinità sarebbe analoga alla comunanza dell’aspetto rispetto agli individui, Eunomio, al fine dei confutare questa dottrina, avrebbe insistito che la divisione genera-species non sia applicabile all’essere immateriale. Ricerco le origini di questo concetto nel platonismo antico e cristiano. In terzo luogo, si affronta il tema della gerarchia dell’essere. Secondo la mia visione nella dottrina di Gregorio di Nissa questo tema ha un ruolo fondamentale. Dimostro che Gregorio di Nissa prese in prestito l’ordine dei componenti della gerarchia dell’essere dal cosiddetto albero di Porfirio, nello sviluppare questo argomento vi introdusse elementi platonici, aristotelici e stoici e cambiò l’ordine dei componenti in relazione all’ordine biblico della creazione. Inoltre analizzo lo sviluppo del tema della gerarchia dell’essere nel conseguente pensiero orientale cristiano e l’influenza di Gregorio di Nissa in questo senso. Mi soffermo inoltre sul tema dell’individuazione attraverso la convergenza delle proprietà nel pensiero di Vasilio di Cesarea e studio lo stato delle proprietà comuni nell’ambito del concetto di individuazione. This dissertation has demonstrated how the topic of the universal was manifested mainly in the Arian controversy of the fourth century and the works of the Cappadocian Fathers, as well as in the Ancient philosophy and the previous and late Eastern Christian philosophical and theological tradition. By speaking of the “universal,” I mean the universal realities of any type (including the properties common to many individuals such as transcendental principles applied to the types of beings participating in them, the links in the hierarchy of beings encompassing the multitude of individuals, etc.), and not only the terms of κοινόν and καθόλου or the notion of a universal understood in the normative technical sense from the viewpoint of the use of the term in the historical and philosophical discourse. The dissertation focuses on three main topics. Firstly, it is the topic of participation. In a wider context of analyzing the role of universals, I distinguish three paradigms of participation, typically used in classical philosophy: the Platonic, the Aristotelian, and the Neoplatonic paradigms. It is demonstrated how the Platonic paradigm found its expression in Origen, Arius, and Gregory of Nyssa; the Aristotelian paradigm – in Origen and Gregory of Nyssa, and the Neoplatonic paradigm, as I am suggesting, in Arius. Secondly, the dissertation addresses the topic of applicability of individuals / species division to rational beings. From that perspective, I reconstruct the intellectual history of the second phase of the Arian controversy. In response to the doctrine of Basil of Caesarea that commonness in the Persons of the Holy Trinity was similar to the commonness of the species in respect to their constituent individuals, and attempting to refute this doctrine, Eunomius insisted that individuals / species division was inapplicable to immaterial beings. I trace the origins of this concept in the Platonism of Antiquity and in Christian Platonism. Thirdly, the dissertation analyzes the topic of the hierarchy of beings. In my opinion, this topic played a paramount role in the teaching of Gregory of Nyssa. I demonstrate that Gregory of Nyssa adopted the order of the levels in his hierarchy of beings from the so-called Tree of Porphyry, in the process introducing some Platonic, Aristotelian, and Stoic elements, and changing the order of the levels in accordance with the Scriptural order of creation. I also trace how the topic of the hierarchy of beings evolved in the subsequent Eastern Christian thought, and what was the impact of Gregory of Nyssa in this regard. In addition, I address the topic of individuation through the convergence of properties in Basil of Caesarea, and discuss the status of general properties in his concept of individuation. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 “The paradigms of participation in the context of the topic of universals in Ancient philosophical tradition” Chapter 2 “The scientific knowledge and the universal in Clement of Alexandria” Chapter 3 “The paradigms of participation in the context of the topic of universals in Origen” Chapter 4 “Participation and universals in the doctrine of Arius” 4.1. The doctrine of Arius 4.2. Language of Participation and Universal Realities in God and in the Created Realm in Arius and the Arians 4.3. Paradigms of Participation and Universals in Arius and Origen 4.4. Neoplatonism of Arius? Chapter 5 “Participation and universals in the Eunomian controversies” 5.1. The Eunomian controversies: the context 5.2. Description of a Human Being through the “Concurrence of Properties” in Basil of Caesarea and its Theological and Philosophical Context 5.3. The discussion on application of the principle “greater-lesser” to essence, and problem of universals 5.4. The principle "greater-lesser": the themes of participation and universals Chapter 6 “The specifics of Gregory of Nyssa’s theaching of the universal and the particular, and its philosophical context” Chapter 7 “Synthesis of Biblical and Logical-Philosophical Descriptions of the Order of Natural Beings in De opificio hominis 8 by Gregory of Nyssa” 7.1. Hierarchies of Beings in Gregory of Nyssa 7.2. The context of the topic of the order of natural beings in De opificio hominis 8 of Gregory of Nyssa 7.3. The Historical and philosophical context of the order of natural beings in De opificio hominis 8: Posidonius or Porphyry? 7.4. The Order of Natural Beings in Gregory of Nyssa and the Tree of Porphyry 7.4.1. Genera-Species Division in Authors Prior to Gregory of Nyssa 7.4.2. Genera-Species Division in Gregory of Nyssa and Porphyry: Similarities 7.4.3. Genera-Species Division in Gregory of Nyssa and Porphyry: Differences 7.5. Conclusion Chapter 8 “Reconstruction of Eunomius’ doctrine of universals and of its theological and philosophical context” Chapter 9 “Hierarchies of Beings in the Patristic Thought. Gregory of Nyssa, Dionysius the Areopagite, Maximus the Confessor, John of Damascus, and the Palamites” Bibliography 1 Introduction In the first centuries after its emergence, the Eastern Christian civilization developed a rich intellectual tradition which made a significant impact on the subsequent periods. On the one hand, the Eastern Christian philosophical thought of the first centuries A.D. addressed problems common for the history of philosophy (the problem of universals, the psychophysical problem, the topic of the ontological hierarchy of beings, etc.), while, on the other hand, it dealt with fairly narrow issues specific for the Early Christian thought (Trinitarian doctrine, Christology, Pneumatology, etc.). The presence of circle of specific subjects playing a particularly important role in Christian thought resulted in the emergence of the phenomenon of dogmatic (in a technical sense of the word) thinking within the Christian civilization. From the viewpoint of that paradigm, religious and philosophical doctrines which developed over the course of numerous and intense debates, received their authorized formulations in the conciliar decrees and became largely “dogmatized” in the process. In the course of this dogmatization, certain trends and traditions which had existed in the Eastern Christian philosophical tradition, went out of sight or entirely disappeared; other traditions remained on the surface and were actively elaborated. At the same time, Eastern Christian philosophical thought was in close contact with the non-Christian classical
Recommended publications
  • GLIMPSES INTO the KNOWLEDGE, ROLE, and USE of CHURCH FATHERS in RUS' and RUSSIAN MONASTICISM, LATE 11T H to EARLY 16 T H CENTURIES
    ROUND UP THE USUALS AND A FEW OTHERS: GLIMPSES INTO THE KNOWLEDGE, ROLE, AND USE OF CHURCH FATHERS IN RUS' AND RUSSIAN MONASTICISM, LATE 11t h TO EARLY 16 t h CENTURIES David M. Goldfrank This essay originated at the time that ASEC was in its early stages and in response to a requestthat I write something aboutthe church Fathers in medieval Rus'. I already knew finding the patrology concerning just the original Greek and Syriac texts is nothing short of a researcher’s black hole. Given all the complexities in­ volved in the manuscript traditions associated with such superstar names as Basil of Caesarea, Ephrem the Syrian, John Chrysostom, and Macarius of wherever (no kidding), to name a few1 and all of The author would like to thank the staffs of the Hilandar Research Library at The Ohio State University and, of course, the monks of Hilandar Monastery for encouraging the microfilming of the Hilandar Slavic manuscripts by Ohio State. I thank the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; and Georgetown University’s Woodstock Theological Library as well as its Lauinger Library Reference Room for their kind help. Georgetown University’s Office of the Provost and Center for Eurasian, East European and Russian Studies provided summer research support. Thanks also to Jennifer Spock and Donald Ostrowski for their wise suggestions. 1 An excellent example of this is Plested, Macarian Legacy. For the spe­ cific problem of Pseudo-Macarius/Pseudo-Pseudo-Macarius as it relates to this essay, see NSAW, 78-79. Tapestry of Russian Christianity: Studies in History and Culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homilies of John Chrysostom
    366 Tsamakda Chapter 25 The Homilies of John Chrysostom Vasiliki Tsamakda The Author and His Work St John Chrysostom (c.347-407) was the most important Father of the Orthodox Church. Archbishop of Constantinople from 398 to 404, he was officially recog- nized as a Doctor of the Orthodox Church by the Council of Chalcedon in 4511 due to his vast and important theological writings.2 He was the most produc- tive among the Church Fathers, with over 1,500 works written by, or ascribed to him. His name was firmly associated with the Liturgy, but above all he was appreciated for his numerous sermons and as an extraordinary preacher. From the 6th century on he was called Chrysostomos, the “golden mouthed”. The fact that over 7,000 manuscripts including his writings exist, attests to the impor- tance and great distribution of his works, many of which were translated into other languages. The great majority of them date after the Iconoclasm. The homilies of John Chrysostom were read during the Service of the Matins (Orthros) mainly in Byzantine monasteries. They were transmitted in various collections or series from which only a few were selected for illustration. Illustrated homilies of John Chrysostom The exact number of illustrated manuscripts containing Chrysostomic ser- mons is unknown,3 but their number is extremely low in view of the very rich 1 The translation of his relics to Constantinople and their deposition in the Church of the Holy Apostles marks the beginning of his cult in Byzantium. The Orthodox Church commemorates him on 27 January, 13 November and also on 30 January together with the other two Cappadocian Fathers, Basil the Great and Gregory of Nazianzus.
    [Show full text]
  • "Breaking Ground" a Look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy
    Verbum Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 11 December 2009 "Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381). Frederick J. Flo St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum Part of the Religion Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Flo, Frederick J. (2009) ""Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381).," Verbum: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol7/iss1/11 This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol7/iss1/11 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381). Abstract In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. "At the center of Christian dogma lies the worship of the Holy Trinity. Naturally, with every central focus comes controversy. Throughout history, the interpretation of the Trinity has created a tremendous amount of debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa
    Durham E-Theses Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Neamµu, Mihail G. How to cite: Neamµu, Mihail G. (2002) Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4187/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk University of Durham Faculty of Arts Department of Theology The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Mihail G. Neamtu St John's College September 2002 M.A. in Theological Research Supervisor: Prof Andrew Louth This dissertation is the product of my own work, and the work of others has been properly acknowledged throughout. Mihail Neamtu Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa MA (Research) Thesis, September 2002 Abstract This MA thesis focuses on the work of one of the most influential and authoritative theologians of the early Church: St Gregory of Nyssa (f396).
    [Show full text]
  • Cappadocian Legacy
    CAPPADOCIAN LEGACY A Critical Appraisal Edited by Doru Costache and Philip Kariatlis St Andrew’s Orthodox Press Sydney, 2013 StAndrewsBook2013_R.indd 1 5/09/13 12:10 AM Text copyright © 2013 remains with the authors All rights reserved. Except for any fair dealing permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this book may be reproduced by any means without prior permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Cappadocian legacy / Doru Costache and Philip Kariatlis (eds). ISBN: 978-0-9775974-9-9 (paperback) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Gregory, of Nazianzus, Saint. Basil, Saint, Bishop of Caesarea, approximately 329-379. Gregory, of Nyssa, Saint, approximately 335-approximately 394 Theology--Early works to 1800 Christian saints--Biography--Early works to 1800. Other Authors/Contributors: Costache, Doru, editor. Kariatlis, Philip, editor. Dewey Number: 230 St Andrew’s Orthodox Press 242 Cleveland Street, Redfern, NSW, 2016 www.standrewsorthodoxpress.com.au StAndrewsBook2013_R.indd 2 5/09/13 12:10 AM Contents PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................5 1. THE CAPPADOCIANS WITHIN TRADITION The Cappadocian Fathers as Founders of Byzantine Thought David Bradshaw .....................................................................................................................................11 Were the Fathers Proponents
    [Show full text]
  • Pat 101 – Nicene & Post Nicene Fathers
    PAT 101 – NICENE & POST NICENE FATHERS Lecture I What is Patrology? Patrology is derived from Latin word “Pater” which means “Father” Patrology is the science dealing with the life, acts, writings, sayings, doctrines & thoughts of the early fathers. Patrology focuses on ensuring the authenticity of these acts, publishing them and translating them in modern languages. Why Study Patrology? Leads us to a true understanding of Christianity through the works of the early fathers. Reveals to us the circumstances in which the fathers witnessed to Christ. Helps us discover the fathers‟ dogma, doctrines & concepts concerning God, man, church, salvation, eternal life. Etc. Classifications of Patristic Writings Classification by Time Especially first 5 centuries can be classified on Time. First Ecumenical Council (Nicaea) separated fathers into 2 kinds: Ante-Nicene – Simple Literature Nicene & Post Nicene Fathers Classification by Language Greek (Eastern) Fathers Majority of the fathers wrote in Greek. Some also used their national languages such as Coptic, Syrian & Armenian. Latin (Western) Fathers Classification by Place Egyptian Fathers – School of Alexandria & Desert Fathers. Antiochenes Fathers – In Antioch (Turkey) Cappadocian Fathers – In Cappadocia (Asia Minor) Latin Fathers – In Europe Classification by Material Apologetic – defending the faith against critics. Biblico-exegetical – Interpretations/Explanations of the Bible. Homilies & sermons. Letters. Liturgical works. Classification by Material Christian poetry & songs Dialogues Ascetic Writings Church canons Church History Chronological Outline of Patristic Literature The Beginning of Christian Patristic Literature Ante-Nicene Literature after St. Irenaeus. Golden Age of the Eastern Fathers Western Fathers (4th and 5th Centuries) Writings after the Council of Chalcedon Outline of Patristic Literature • Canonical Legislation & liturgical Formulas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alexandrian and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church in the Writings of Thomas Aquinas
    The Alexandrian and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church in the writings of Thomas Aquinas Los Padres alejandrinos y capadocios en los escritos de Tomás de Aquino Leo J. Elders s.v.d. Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas Resumen: Santo Tomás considera que los escritos de los Padres están directamente relacionados con las Escrituras ya que fueron escritos bajo la influencia rectora del mismo Espíritu Santo. Existe, pues, una continuidad de pensamiento entre los Padres como re- presentantes de la autoridad de los Apóstoles y la Biblia. Por este motivo, sería bueno re- conocer cuán profundamente santo Tomás se inspira en el pensamiento de los Padres. En esta contribución presentaremos los temas principales dentro de los escritos de los Padres Alejandrinos y Capadocios que han influido en el propio pensamiento de santo Tomás. Palabras clave: Atanasio de Alejandría, Cirilo de Alejandría, Basilio Magno, Gre- gorio Nacianceno, Gregorio de Nisa, Tomás de Aquino. Abstract: St. Thomas considers the writings of the Fathers as directly related to Scrip- ture since these were composed under the guiding influence of the same Holy Spirit. There exists therefore a continuity of thought between the Fathers as representatives of the au- thority of the Apostles and the Bible.1 For this reason, one would do well to recognize how deeply St. Thomas draw upon the thought of the Fathers. In this contribution we will present the main themes within the writings of the Alexandrian and Cappadocian Fathers that have influenced St. Thomas’s own thought.2 Key words: Athanasius of Alexandria, Cyril of Alexandria, Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, Gregory of Nyssa, Thomas Aquinas.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginity Discourse and Ascetic Politics in the Writings of Ambrose of Milan
    Virginity Discourse and Ascetic Politics in the Writings of Ambrose of Milan by Ariel Bybee Laughton Department of Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Dr. Elizabeth A. Clark, Supervisor ___________________________ Dr. Lucas Van Rompay ___________________________ Dr. J. Warren Smith ___________________________ Dr. J. Clare Woods ___________________________ Dr. Zlatko Pleše Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 ABSTRACT Virginity Discourse and Ascetic Politics in the Writings of Ambrose of Milan by Ariel Bybee Laughton Department of Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Dr. Elizabeth A. Clark, Supervisor ___________________________ Dr. Lucas Van Rompay ___________________________ Dr. J. Warren Smith ___________________________ Dr. J. Clare Woods ___________________________ Dr. Zlatko Pleše An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 Copyright by Ariel Bybee Laughton 2010 ABSTRACT Ambrose, bishop of Milan, was one of the most outspoken advocates of Christian female virginity in the fourth century C.E. This dissertation examines his writings on virginity in the interest of illuminating the historical and social contexts of his teachings. Considering Ambrose’s treatises on virginity as literary productions with social, political, and theological functions in Milanese society, I look at the various ways in which the bishop of Milan formulated ascetic discourse in response to the needs and expectations of his audience. Furthermore, I attend to the various discontinuities in Ambrose’s ascetic writings in the hope of illuminating what kinds of ideological work these texts were intended to perform by the bishop within Milanese society and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Basil the Great
    Saint Basil the Great St. Basil of Caesarea, his brother St. Gregory of Nyssa and their friend St Gregory of Nazianzius are known as the Cappadocian Fathers. They were Bishops and had done much to defend the faith of the Church by vehemently refuting the arguments of the heretics. They were saintly fathers. They oppose to Actius, Eunomius and others who rejected the Godhead and eternity of the Holy Spirit. They explained the faith of the Church in such a way as to make it possible for the human mind with its limitation to grasp the principle of the Trinity and the mystery behind the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. Basil of Caesarea also known as Saint Basil the Great was the Greek bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia, of Asia Minor. He was a very influential theologian who opposed the heresies of the early church and fought against both Arianism and the followers of Apollinaris of Laodicea. He was the strongest supporter of Nicene Creed. He had very good political connections and at the same time above all, deep theological knowledge. Saint Paul of Thebes, St. Antony, St. Pakomios and St. Makarios were the leaders of the Egyptian church tradition. St. Ephrem was the leader of the Syrian church and St. Ephiphanios was the leader of the Palastiniean church tradition. But St, Basil was the first ascetic leader of the Eastern Church tradition. Basil was born into the wealthy family of Basil the Elder and Emilia of Caesarea in Cappadocia around A. D 330. Basil the Elder was known as a scholar and eminent writer throughout Cappadocia.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome, Ambrose & the Latin West
    Jerome, Ambrose & the Latin West 1. Rome & the Latin West in the 4th Century 2. Hilary of Poitiers: Texts, Translations & Studies 3. Marius Victorinus: Texts, Translations & Studies 4. Ambrosiaster: Texts, Translations & Studies 5. Rufinus of Aquileia: Texts, Translations & Studies 6. Jerome: Texts & Translations 7. Jerome: Studies 8. Ambrose: Texts & Translations 9. Ambrose: Studies 10. The Early Papacy: Studies 11. Leo the Great: Texts & Translations 12. Leo the Great: Studies 1. ROME & THE LATIN WEST IN THE 4TH CENTURY Peter Brown, Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350-550 AD (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012). R. Curran, Pagan City and Christian Capital: Rome in the Fourth Century, Oxford Classical Monographs (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000). Bernard Green, Christianity in Ancient Rome: The First Three Centuries (New York: T&T Clark, 2010). Mark Humphries, Communities of the Blessed: Social Environment and Religious Change in Northern Italy: 200-400, Oxford Early Christian Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000). Mark Humphries, “The West (1): Italy, Gaul, and Spain,” in The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies, eds. Susan Ashbrook Harvey & David G. Hunter (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 283-302. 1 Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J. Mark Humphries, “Italy, A.D. 425-605,” in Late Antiquity: Empire and Successors A.D. 425-600, eds. A. Cameron, B. Ward-Perkins, and M. Whitby, Cambridge Ancient History 14 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 525-551. Richard Krautheimer, Three Christian Capitals: Topography and Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Fathers
    GOBBH OOQELALU CERO@E LC QEB APPRJMQFLK Studies in the Faith The Church Fathers GOBBH OOQELALU C ER O@ E L C Q EB APPRJMQFLK 1804 Thirteenth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98122-2515 Phone: (206) 323-8557 Fax: (206) 323-1205 Email: officemanager@ assumptionseattle.org Presented by Fr. Dean Kouldukis Page 2 Studies in the Faith THE CHURCH FATHERS “Let us love one another that with one mind we may confess: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Trinity, one in essence and inseparable” (From the Divine Liturgy) READING ASSIGNMENTS Welcome to the Orthodox Church: by Frederica Mathewes-Green, Pages 68-84 “Impact Pray-ers”: in Christian History, Vol. 16, No. 2, Pages 28-31. “Getting Their Act Together”: in Christian History, Vol. 18, No. 4, Pages 34-37. St. Paul’s First Letter to the Thessalonians: 1:1 - 5:28. VIDEO Introduction to Orthodoxy Videos - Patristics: The Fathers of the Church (Discovering Orthodox Christianity) https://www.goarch.org/-/patristics-the-fathers-of-the-church he Holy Bible, and more specifically, the New Testament, does not contain all the doctrine and teachings of T Christ. The Church, which has produced the Bible, does not completely submit itself to only one of the epi- phenomena of its life, even if it is the most authoritative one, the Holy Scriptures. An important part of the teachings and doctrine of Christ continues to be present and handed down to the generations of Saints through other means and ways that are also part of the life of the Church, a life in the Holy Spirit. One of these ways and means through which Christ's truth comes to us is through the Fathers of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Trinity in the Cappadocian Fathers
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Graduate Thesis Collection Graduate Scholarship 1-1-1960 A Study of the Trinity in the Cappadocian Fathers George W. Buck Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/grtheses Part of the Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Buck, George W., "A Study of the Trinity in the Cappadocian Fathers" (1960). Graduate Thesis Collection. 440. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/grtheses/440 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Thesis Collection by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. (This certification-sheet is to be bound with the thesis. The major pro- fessor should have it filled out at the oral examination.) Name of candidate: ..........g~.~~~~..~~;ht~~J?J...~~.C?~ . Oral examination: Date ~~r...}? ..!~.?.Q . Committee: •.............................................................................................Professor Frank Albert , Chairman. Professor David Pellett .............................................................................................. Professor Robert Tobias .............................................................................................. .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]